To whom Hindu Law applies – Explained!

(i) Hindus by birth, and also to Hindus by religion, i.e., converts to Hinduism;

The Supreme Court in Pennnal v. Ponnuswami observed that a person may be a Hindu by birth or by
conversion. A mere theoretical allegiance to the Hindu faith by a person born in another faith does not
convert him into a Hindu, nor is a bare declarations that he is a Hindu is sufficient to convert him to
Hinduism.

But a bona fide intention to be converted to the Hindu faith accompanied by conduct unequivocally
expressing that intention may be sufficient evidence of conversion. No formal ceremony of purification is
necessary to effectuate conversion.

(ii) Illegitimate children where both parents are Hindus;

(iii) Illegitimate children where the father is a Christian and the mother a Hindu, and the children are
brought up as Hindus. But the Hindu Law of coparcenary, which contemplates the father as the head of
the family and the sons as coparceners by birth with rights of survivorship, cannot form the very nature of
the case apply to such children;

(iv) Jain, Buddhists in India, Sikhs and Nambudri Brahmans except, so far such law is varied by custom
and to Lingayats who are considered as Shudras;

(v) A Hindu by birth who, having renounced Hinduism, has reverted to it after performing the religious
rites of expiation and repentance or even without a formal ritual of reconversion when he was recognised
as a Hindu by the community;

(vi) Sons of Hindu dancing girls of the Naik caste converted to Mohammedanism where the sons are
taken into the family of the Hindu grand-parents and are brought up as a Hindu;

(vii) Brahmos Arya Samajists, and to Santhals of Chota Nagpur, and also to Santhals of Manbhum except
so far as it is not varied by custom;

(viii) Hindus who made a declaration that they were not Hindus for the purpose of the Special Marriage
Act, 1872; and

(ix) A person who is born in a Hindu religion, does not cease to be a Hindu merely because he departs
from the standard of orthodoxy in matters of diet and ceremonial observations.
Since the passing of Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, Hindu Succession Act of 1956, Hindu Adoptions and
Maintenance Act of 1956 and Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act of 1956, the following persons shall
be deemed to be Hindus;

Any person who is Hindu by religion irrespective of or regardless of its forms or developments,
including—

(I) (a) A Virashaiva,

(b) A Lingayat,

(c) A follower of the Brahmo, Prathana or Arya Samaj.

Any person who is either—

(II) (a) A Buddhist by religion; or

(b) A Jain by religion; or

(c) A Sikh by religion.

Any other person domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who is not—

(III) (a) A Muslim by religion, or

(b) A Christian by religion, or

(c) A Parsi by religion, or

(d) A Jew by religion,

Except when it is proved that any such person would not have been governed by the Hindu Law or by any
custom or usage as part of that law (Hindu Law) in respect of any of the matters which are dealt with in
these Acts if these Acts had not been passed.

The following persons are Hindus, Buddhists, Jains or Sikhs by religions:—

(a) Any child, legitimate or illegitimate, both of whose parents belong to any of the above religions;
(b) Any child, legitimate or illegitimate, both of whose parents (father and mother) are Hindus, Buddhists,
Jains or Sikhs by religion;

(c) Any child, legitimate or illegitimate, one of whose parents either (father or mother) is a Hindu, Budhist,
Jaina or Sikh by religion and who is brought up as a member of the tribe, community, group or family to
which such parent (either the father or the mother) belongs or belonged;

(d) Any person who is a convert or recovert to the Hindu, Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh religion.

Explanation (b) of section 2 of the Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Succession Act, Hindu Adoptions and
Maintenance Act and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, whose language is in pari materia,
expressly provides for the conferment of the status of a “Hindu on a person even though such status is
doubtful when the personal law of the parties is invoked.

These Acts provide that the expression ‘Hindu’ in any portion of these Acts, shall be construed as if it
included a person, who though not a Hindu by religion, is nevertheless a person to whom this Act applies
by virtue of the provision contained in these sections. Therefore, if a parent belonging to a twice born
class inducts the child into a Hindu family and brings him up as such, then the statute invests him with the
status of a Hindu and recognises him as a Hindu.

People Who Have Changed Religion:

It is a general principle of law that a person who has accepted a religion cannot rely on a custom opposed
to that religion.

Thus where a Hindu converts to Mohammedanism he will be, as a general rule, governed by the
Mohemmedan Law. But a well-established custom in the case of such converts follow their old law in
matters of succession and inheritance, has been held to override the general presumption. Thus several
classes of Mohammedans, who were formerly Hindus like the Khojas and the Cutchi Memons of Bombay,
the Halwai Memons of Khatiawar and the Sunni Borahs of Gujarat have by custom, retained the Hindu
Law of Succession and Inheritance.

But in view of the passing of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, the custom in the
communities ceases to be applicable and these Muslim communities are governed by Muslim Personal
Law in the matters of succession and inheritance also.

In cases where Hindus have converted to Christianity, before the passing of the Indian Succession Act,
1925, such converted persons had to elect either to adhere or to renounce the Hindu Law of Succession.
But the Act brought under its provisions all native Christians whether they have or have not elected to
remain subject to Hindu Law.