Sunteți pe pagina 1din 6

Source: BOE MTG 9_17_19_ CHIEF OF STAFF_ 2018-19 TESTING AND 1

WCPSS Calculation ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS PRESENTATION (pdf file)

Middle AND
High School

Year 1 of MVP? FLAT

Questions? Comments? Blain Dillard: wakemvpparent@gmail.com


NCDPI WCPSS Calculation NCDPI 2

M1SEP metric M1 metric

Source: BOE MTG 9_17_19_ CHIEF OF STAFF_ 2018-19 TESTING AND


ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS PRESENTATION (pdf file)
We are aware of 2 versions of the Math 1 data sets 3

published by WCPSS to the public in the past year


Data set V1 - November 2018
• Published by WCPSS in November 2018 SAC meeting, showing grade level proficiency
(GLP) and college/career readiness (CCR) gains from 2016-2017 to 2017-2018 (year 1 of
MVP in WCPSS)
• Internally calculated by WCPSS
• Tweeted by MVP in Nov 2018
• Quoted verbally and in emails to parents complaining about MVP
• Cited in the FAQ provided to Green Hope
• Cited in the response to 16 parents whose MVP complaints were denied
• Cited indirectly by MVP in lawsuit against WCPSS parent Blain Dillard
• Cited indirectly by MVP in public statement about Dillard and lawsuit
• Cited indirectly by N&O repeating WCPSS success claims
• Possibly seen by other NC counties choosing MVP
Scope: High school only, no • Dr. Tillery provided prior 2 years context upon public records request
banked scores • Tweet removed by MVP upon request of WCPSS (upon request of parents)
• NOT updated or referenced in 9/17/19 Accountability update, except that the 2018 and
2019 GLP numbers were given on a separate chart (page 15).

Data set V2 - September 2019 NCDPI + Data set V1


Scope: • Presented at 9/17 BoE meeting Accountability update September 2019
(page 14)
Middle & • Shows only grade level proficiency (GLP) trends from
2013 to 2019 (no CCR)
high • Internally calculated by WCPSS
schools, • Not quoted in MVP or WCPSS communications about
MVP success
no • Question: In November 2018, why was this data not
used instead of the V1 data?
banked • Hypothesis: See the 2017 vs 2018 results. Flat. The
scores “high school–only” results told a more compelling
story – modest gains.
NCDPI Data set V1
Critical thinking? Critical SINKING. 4

Note: This data reflects high school Math 1 EOC performance. It does not
November 2018 include middle school data, which WCPSS chose not include when the original
graphic on the left was produced to portray year 1 Math 1 increases.

September 2019
“I can say that your numbers below for 2018-19 appear to be correct based
on what we have.” – WCPSS Brad McMillan
4 Year trend in high school
Math 1 EOC
50
40.5 42
40 35.9 34.6
28.3
30 23.2 26.4
March 2019
WCPSS provides context showing prior years 20
8.9
10
0
GLP CCR
2016 2017 2018 2019

Year to Year change


10
4.6 3.2
5 1.5 1.9
0
-5 GLP CCR
-10 -7.4
-15
-20
-25 -19.4
16 to 17 17 to 18 18 to 19
Sources: WCPSS for 2016, 2017, 2018 numbers, and DPI for 2019
http://www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/reporting/
2018-19 School Assessment and Other Indicator Data (xlsx, 111.5mb)
How bad is our 2019 M1 GLP metric? 5

Carteret County Public Schools


Sampson County Schools Sampson, 9 days missed, 57.1% EDS
Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools
Union County Public Schools
Henderson County Schools Carteret = 72.2
Districts Catawba County Schools
Wilkes County Schools 14-17 days missed
with > 500 Moore County Schools
Lincoln County Schools
due to Hurricane
test takers Cabarrus County Schools Florence,
Burke County Schools
Pender County Schools Pender, 16-20 days missed, 58.6% EDS 53.3% EDS
Onslow County Schools Onslow, 13-15 days missed, 61.6% EDS
Brunswick County Schools
Caldwell County Schools
Buncombe County Schools
Gaston County Schools
Stanly County Schools
Davidson County Schools
Wilson County Schools
Franklin County Schools
New Hanover County Schools
Randolph County Schools
Charlotte-M ecklenburg Schools
Craven County Schools

State of NC = 41.2
Cumberland County Schools
State of North Carolina
Iredell-Statesville Schools

EDS - Economically
Cleveland County Schools 53.2% EDS
Harnett County Schools
Disadvantaged Alamance-Burlington Schools
Pitt County Schools
Student Forsyth County Schools
Lee, 3 days missed, 70.1% EDS
Wake County = 34.6
Lee County Schools
Wake County Schools
Rockingham County Schools
Durham Public Schools
Johnston County Schools
1-2 days missed,
Robeson County Schools
Lenoir County Public Schools
Robeson, 18 days missed, 80.1% EDS 46.5% EDS
Wayne County Public Schools
Guilford County Schools
Rowan-Salisbury Schools
Nash-Rocky Mount Schools

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 5 80
Source: 2018-19 School Assessment and Other Indicator Data (xlsx, 111.5mb)
How bad is our 2019 M1 CCR metric? 6

Carteret County Public Schools


Sampson County Schools Sampson, 9 days missed, 57.1% EDS
Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools
Union County Public Schools
Henderson County Schools Carteret = 38.5
Districts Catawba County Schools
Moore County Schools 14-17 days
with > 500 Wilkes County Schools
Pender County Schools Pender, 16-20 days missed, 58.6% EDS
missed due to
test takers Gaston County Schools Hurricane
Cabarrus County Schools
Brunswick County Schools Brunswick, 13-15 days missed, 61.6% EDS Florence,
Burke County Schools
Onslow County Schools 53.3% EDS
Caldwell County Schools
Lincoln County Schools
Buncombe County Schools
Iredell-Statesville Schools
Charlotte-M ecklenburg Schools
Stanly County Schools
New Hanover County Schools
Davidson County Schools

State of NC = 14.8
State of North Carolina
Cumberland County Schools
Lee County Schools

EDS - Economically
Franklin County Schools
Cleveland County Schools
53.2% EDS
Disadvantaged Randolph County Schools Lee, 3 days missed,
Craven County Schools
Student 70.1% EDS
Durham Public Schools
Pitt County Schools
Forsyth County Schools
Harnett County Schools
Alamance-Burlington Schools
Wilson County Schools
Wake County Schools Wake County = 8.9
Robeson County Schools
Guilford County Schools
Johnston County Schools
1-2 days missed,
Rockingham County Schools
Lenoir County Public Schools
Robeson, 18 days
missed, 80.1% EDS
46.5% EDS
Nash-Rocky Mount Schools
Rowan-Salisbury Schools
Wayne County Public Schools

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 6 45
Source: 2018-19 School Assessment and Other Indicator Data (xlsx, 111.5mb)

S-ar putea să vă placă și