Quality Management System Evaluation -Plating Process

Vendor
Vendor Name : Audit Date :
code:
Contact
Phone :
Address :
E-mail :

Plant Head : Quality Head:

Mobile No: Mobile No:

Email Id: Email Id:

Survey / Auditor's Team :

Sr. No. Name Sign

2
Business Details:-

Copy of QMS Certification

Customer List

Organizational Structure - Including Quality Dept.

Lists to be enclosed :

Test & Measuring Equipments

List of type of surface protections conducted

Consent letter from PCB - Pollution Control Board

Score
Sr. Mark Actions Needed
Sr. No. Parameter Check Point Award Remarks / References
No. s (Yes /No)
ed

1 0 No system

Does the organization have QMS

1 2 4 ISO 9001/IATF 16949
system?

3 5 ISO 9001/IATF 16949 & ISO 14001

Has State Pollution Control Board 1 0 NO

(SPCB) given consent to operate
2
to plant facility for surface
finishing? 2 5 Yes

1 0 No control
Whether incoming parts /
chemicals inspection done in 2 3 RQC Incoming Inspection Standard available
3 RQC? Is there any reaction plan
available if parts got rejected in RQC done as per Incoming Inspection Standard &
3 4
RQC? records maintained.

4 5 Reaction plan for the non conformities available.

1 0 No control

Weather incoming parts / 2 3 Identification available

chemicals are stored with proper
4
identification at their location,
FIFO maintained? 3 4 Identification & Location available

4 5 FIFO for incoming parts / chemicals effectively done

No Control Plan/Work Instructions/SOP/Process

1 0
sheet

Whether Control Plan, SOP, WI, 2 3 Available partially

5 Process sheet are available at
each station? 3 4 Available for all but not displayed at all stations.

4 5 Available for all & displayed at all stations

1 0 No Standards/MIS-P / Matrix available

Are there plating Standards/ MIS-
P / Matrix part wise containing
Standards/MIS-P / Matrix available other than shop
6 plating requirements i.e. plating 2 3
floor
type, thickness, SST life, DHE etc.
available with supplier?
3 5 Standards/MIS-P / Matrix are available at shop floor

1 0 No
Whether customer approved
Control Plan for barrel & tank Available but not signed by chemical expert, platter &
7 2 3
plating is available with reaction customer.
plan to operators.
Available & signed by chemical expert, platter &
3 5
customer.

1 0 No

Is pretreatment of parts
8 2 3 Not as per SOP or control plan
conducted?

3 5 Conducted as per SOP or control plan

1 0 No
Whether there is oil content
9 monitoring available at soak 2 3 Oil content monitoring done partially.
cleaning /degreasing tank.
3 5 Oil content monitoring full compliance.

1 0 NO

Is pH of cleaning
10 2 3 Done randomly or partially
media/degreasing checked?

3 5 Done with the fixed duration & records maintained

1 0 No Control

What is the time control Time control mechanism using log sheet & records
11 2 3
mechanism used? maintained

3 5 Time control with timer and buzzer

 Score
Sr. Mark Actions Needed
Sr. No. Parameter Check Point Award Remarks / References
No. s (Yes /No)
ed

1 0 No

Is cleaning/washing media
12 2 3 Discarded randomly
frequently discarded?
Discarded with the defined frequency & records
3 5
maintained

1 0 No
Whether DM water is using in
DM water conductivity checked but record not
13 tanks & its conductivity 2 3
maintained.
maintained properly?
3 5 DM water conductivity checked & record maintained.

1 0 Not as per manufacturing recommendation

What are Current and Voltages
14
used?
2 5 As per manufacturing recommendation

1 0 No Agitation

What agitation mechanism is

15 2 3 Manual agitation
used?

3 5 Mechanical agitation

1 0 Not available
What recirculation mechanism is
16
used?
2 5 Pumping mechanism

1 0 Not controlled

How is temperature of the bath Using thermocouple with analog or digital system &
17 2 3
controlled and maintained/ records maintained

3 5 Buzzer system

1 0 No
Is chemistry of bath checked and
Randomly checked or checked but no records
18 maintained at pre-treatment 2 3
maintained
process?
Checked with defined frequency and records
3 5
maintained

1 0 No Agitation

19 Passivation: Agitation mechanism 2 3 Manual agitation

3 5 Mechanical agitation

1 0 No Control

How is time & pH in Passivation Time control mechanism using log sheet & records
20 2 3
controlled? maintained
Time control with timer and buzzer & pH controlled by
3 5
on line pH meter & record maintained.

1 0 No done

Whether top coat/ lacquer /sealant

21 2 3 Done on some parts (partial compliance)
is doing for all Minda parts?

3 5 Done on all parts.

1 0 No

Is chemistry of bath checked and Randomly checked or Checked but no records

22 2 3
maintained at plating barrel /tank? maintained
Checked with defined frequency and records
3 5
maintained

1 0 No
Whether there is parts list
Part list available for De-hydrogen embrittlement time
23 available for De-hydrogen 2 3
& temp.
embrittlement with time & temp.?
De-hydrogen embrittlement done within 4hrs of acid
3 5
pickling & records maintained.
Whether TTR(temp. travel rate) is
done for oven, temperature
1 0 Not performed
uniformity surveys performed
yearly? Ovens should be tested
24 both empty and dense load. Parts 2 3 Partial compliance
must come upto temperature
within one hour of entering oven Performed with the mentioned specifications &
3 5
and meet temperature tolerance records maintained
specified by customer.
1 0 Not system
Whether there is calibration
frequency defined for all test &
25 2 3 Partial compliance
measuring equipments & records
maintained?
Performed on all test & measuring equipments &
3 5
records maintained

1 0 No control
Whether Hexavalent & Trivalent
process are doing at separate
26 2 3 Done at separate location within the plant premises.
locations & if not, proper action
taken to avoid mixing?
3 5 No hexavalent plating done in plant premises.

1 0 No
Does quality department review,
27 address and document customer 2 3 Action plan evident, but no Effectiveness monitoring
and internal concerns?
Reviewed with action plan, Customer feedback,
3 5
Effectiveness monitoring & records maintained

1 0 No plan
Is there any preventative
28 maintenance program? For 2 3 Partial PM plan
Barrels, racks, baskets, rectifiers
3 5 PM plan and compliance evident

1 0 No identification throughout process

Is product clearly identified and
29 staged throughout the plating
process? (To avoid part mixing)
 Score
Sr. Mark Actions Needed
Sr. No. Parameter Check Point Award Remarks / References
No. s (Yes /No)
ed
Is product clearly identified and
29 staged throughout the plating 2 3 Identification/tagging at partial stages
process? (To avoid part mixing)
Identification/tagging at all stages with proper control
3 5
& guideline to the operators

1 0 Not defined
Is rejection area clearly defined
30 and are non confirming parts 2 3 Defined and followed
being properly disposed?
Defined and followed, Red bin with Lock & key
3 5
arrangement, scrap note records.

1 0 No. S.S.T. plan available.

2 3 Available but implementation partial.

Whether S.S.T. plan is available &
31
implemented.
3 4 Available & implemented for all parts.

Available & implemented for all parts & action taken

4 5
for non-conformities.

1 0 No

Are PPEs used throughout the

32 2 3 Partially used
shop floor?

3 5 Used everywhere as per requirements.

1 0 No
Whether there is a chemical
storage area? Is free from
33 2 3 Partially maintained.
dust/moisture content or other
environmental impact?
3 5 Full compliance

1 0 No
Whether they register the entry of
chemicals? Whether they have
34 maintained minimum & maximum 2 3 Partially entry made.
stock of chemicals with reorder
qty.?
3 5 Full compliance

1 0 No Process audits conducted

35 Is process audit conducted? 2 3 Audit plan with check sheets available

Compliance with defined frequency verified, with NC

3 5
closure.

1 0 No Inspection

2 3 Final inspection done but no records maintained

36 Is Final Inspection & PDQA done?
Final Inspection done with records but no PDQA
3 4
report provided.
Final Inspection done with records. PDQA report
4 5
provided for all lots.

1 0 No rework procedure defined

Whether they handled rework
37 process properly & maintain its 2 3 Partially compliance as per defined procedure
record?
3 5 Full compliance with procedure

1 0 No control
Whether they take proper
38 measures to maintain DFT as 2 3 Partially compliance
required in drawing?
Full compliance with records (sample from each
3 5
barrel & rack thickness checked before drag out).

1 0 No

Is annual maintenance of the

39 2 3 Followed partially
facility carried out?

3 5 Followed and evident

1 0 No

Are packaging standards

40 2 3 Followed partially
followed?
Followed and verified, packing std. available for all
3 5
Minda parts.
TOTAL SCORE 200 TOTAL SCORE ACHIEVED
PERCENTAGE SCORE ACHIEVED :-
Auditees :

Sr. No. NAME TITLE Sign

1
2
3
4
Auditor (Leader) Comments :
Grade Category Criteria Brief description

A Good >75% points Good -keep it up

B Need Improvement 50% to 75% points Supplier will submit action plan to improve within one month & re-audit will be planned.

C Not Qualified Below 50 % (Consolidation) Need to take call with purchase to make supplier consolidation plan.

Note:- 1) Action to be taken where score is ZERO or as per auditor recommendation for individual check point, supplier also take internal actions where scope of improvement.
2) Supplier to submit action plan on non-conformities within 3 working days & closure with evidences within 15 working days from audit date.

9332E-X, 10.06.2019