Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
I. Heavy Industries
1. Logging
2. Major wood processing projects
3. Introduction of fauna (exotic-animals) in public/private forests
4. Forest occupancy
5. Extraction of mangrove products
6. Grazing
c. Fishery Projects
a. Major dams
b. Major power plants (fossil-fueled, nuclear fueled, hydroelectric or
geothermal)
c. Major reclamation projects
d. Major roads and bridges
- LGU - although LGU may not play a significant tole in the environmental
impact assessment system, it is important to monitor these projects in order to plan
for the appropriate location of these projects vis-a-vis residential and other land uses.
- LLDA -
- BFAR
Year of
Enactment and Enacted and Implemented in 1978
Implementation
1. Scoping
- initiated by the proponent at the earliest possible stage of project
development;
Objectives:
a. Provide an early link between the DENR and the proponent to ensure
that Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) addresses relevant issues;
b. Allow stakeholders (significantly affected by the project or
undertaking, i.e. local community, industry, LGUs, NGOs and People’s
Organizations (POs);
c. Establish an agreement based from Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) between the proponent, the DENR and the stakeholders;
d. Address issues and identify possible legal constraints regarding the
project proposal;
e. Determine whether the project or undertaking requires the conduct of
an environmental risk assessment; and
f. Determine issues relating to social acceptability
5. Agreed-upon Scope
- basis for the EIA and the review of the EIS
7. Submission of EIS
- the proponent shall submit 10 copies of the EIS and e-copies to the EMB
for review.
- the proponent shall likewise furnish a copy of the EIS to the Offices of
the Undersecretary handling the environment, the concerned Regional
Executive Director, PENRO, CENRO, and the Municipality/City Mayor where
the project is proposed to be located.
10. Initial Review of EIS Documents - Upon receipt of the EIS, the EMB
shall immediately determine the completeness of the documents submitted. If
it need revision, the same shall be returned and revised accordingly.
11. Convening of, and Endorsement to, the EIARC - Within 15 days
from the date of submission of the EIS, the EMB shall convene the EIARC and
endorse the EIS to said body for substantive review.
12. Substantive Review by the EIARC - EIARC shall evaluate the EIS
based on the following criteria, but not limited to, ocular inspection/site visits
and technical studies conducted by experts. Review must be completed within
60 days from receipt of the EIS
13. EIARC Report - Within 15 days from completion of review, the EIARC
shall submit a report to the EMB Director containing the results of its
review/evaluation. The report shall contain the following:
A. Environmental impacts and corresponding costed mitigation and
enhancement measures of the project or undertaking;
B. Key issues/concerns;
C. Proponent’s response to issues;
D. Compliance with review criteria, technical/substantive content and
social acceptability requirements; and
E. The acceptability of the proposed EIS
16. Transmittal of EIS Records and ECCs - In the event that an ECC is
issued, the Secretary shall cause the transmittal of the EIS, all pertinent
records and documents, and the ECC to the EMB within 10 days from the date
of such issuance. The following offices shall likewise be furnished a copy: (1)
Regional Executive Director of the DENR; (2) PENRO; (3) CENRO; (4) the
Municipality/City Mayor; and (5) the proponent.
2. Eligible Preparers
- the IEE may be prepared by the proponent’s technical staff or a
professional group commissioned by the proponent, duly-accredited by the
EMB.
6. EMPAS Report
- Within 15 days from completion of the review, the EMPAS shall submit a
report to the RED of the DENR. The EMPAS may recommend the issuance or
non-issuance of the ECC, OR the preparation of the EIS. Should the EMPAS
recommend the issuance of the ECC, the report must contain the following:
A. The environmental impacts and costed mitigation and
enhancement measures of the project;
B. Key issues/concerns;
C. Proponent’s response to issues;
D. Compliance with review criteria, technical/substantive content and
social acceptability requirements; and
E. Acceptability of the proposed project.
9. Scoping
- Should the RED decide that an EIS is further required, he or she shall
likewise the determine whether the IEE process was sufficient for scoping
purposes or not
10. [Same procedure as #7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15 of the Environmentally Critical
Projects]
Ignacia Balicas vs. Fact-Finding and Intelligence Bureau, G.R. No. 145972,
March 23, 2004
FACTS: In the development of the Cherry Hills Subdivision (CHS), Philjas applied
for the issuance of ECC from the DENR-Region IV
Respondent BALICAS, PENRO senior environmental management specialist,
monitored the implementation of the CHS Project Development to check compliance
with the terms and conditions in the ECC. She conducted another monitoring on the
project for the same purpose. In both instances, she noted that the project was still in
the construction stage hence, compliance with the stipulated conditions could not be
fully assessed, and therefore, a follow-up monitoring is proper. It appeared from the
records that this August 23, 1995 monitoring inspection was the last one conducted by
the DENR.
The charge against petitioner involved a supposed failure on her part to monitor and
inspect the development of CHS, which was assumed to be her duty as DENR senior
environmental management specialist assigned in the province of Rizal.
For her part, petitioner belied allegations that monitoring was not conducted, claiming
that she monitored the development of CHS as evidenced by 3 monitoring
reports .She further claimed good faith and exercise of due diligence, insisting that the
tragedy was a fortuitous event. She reasoned that the collapse did not occur in Cherry
Hills, but in the adjacent mountain eastern side of the subdivision.
The Office of the Ombudsman rendered a decision imposing upon petitioner the
supreme penalty of dismissal from office for gross neglect of duty.
Petitioner seasonably filed a petition for review of the Ombudsmans decision with the
CA. The Court of Appeals dismissed the petition for lack of merit and affirmed the
appealed decision. It found that the landslide was a preventable occurrence and that
petitioner was guilty of gross negligence in failing to closely monitor Philjas
compliance with the conditions of the ECC given the known inherent instability of the
ground where the subdivision was developed. The appellate court likewise denied
petitioners motion for reconsideration.
NO
In order to ascertain if there had been gross neglect of duty, we have to look at the
lawfully prescribed duties of petitioner. Unfortunately, DENR regulations are silent
on the specific duties of a senior environmental management specialist. Internal
regulations merely speak of the functions of the Provincial Environment and Natural
Resources Office (PENRO) to which petitioner directly reports.
Tthe monitoring duties of the PENRO mainly deal with broad environmental concerns,
particularly pollution abatement. This general monitoring duty is applicable to all
types of physical developments that may adversely impact on the environment,
whether housing projects, industrial sites, recreational facilities, or scientific
undertakings.
However, a more specific monitoring duty is imposed on the HLURB as the sole
regulatory body for housing and land development.
P.D. No. 1586 prescribes the following duties on the HLURB (then Ministry of
Human Settlements) in connection with environmentally critical projects requiring an
ECC:
For the same purpose as above, the Ministry of Human Settlements [now HLURB]
shall:
(a) prepare the proper land or water use pattern for said critical project(s) or area(s);
(d) perform such other functions as may be directed by the President from time to
time.
The legal duty to monitor housing projects, like the CHP, against calamities such as
landslides due to continuous rain, is clearly placed on the HLURB, not on the
petitioner as PENRO senior environmental management specialist. In fact, the
law imposes no clear and direct duty on petitioner to perform such narrowly defined
monitoring function.
SECOND DIVISION
Gentlemen:
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated JUN 23
2004.
G.R. No. 161436 (Lipin Otadan, et al. vs. Rio Tuba Nickel Mining Corporation.)
Acting on the Motion for Reconsideration dated April 26, 2004 filed by the petitioners
of this Court's Resolution dated February 23, 2004 denying their petition for review
on certiorari for late filing, the Court resolved to DENY WITH FINALITY said
motion for lack of merit. It is axiomatic that the perfection of an appeal in the manner
and within the period prescribed by law is not only mandatory but jurisdictional and
the failure to perfect the appeal has the effect of rendering the judgment final and
executory.[1] cralaw
Moreover, the petitioners mainly assail the Decision dated September 30, 2003 of the
Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 75014 finding no grave abuse of discretion on
the part of the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(DENR) when he issued the Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) No.
0201-021-313 to the respondent Rio Tuba Nickel Mining Corporation for its
Hydrometallurgical Processing Plant in Barangay Rio Tuba, Municipality of Bataraza,
Palawan. The issuance of the ECC is an exercise by the Secretary of the DENR of his
quasi-judicial functions. This Court has consistently held that the courts will not
interfere in matters which are addressed to the sound discretion of the government
agency entrusted with the regulation of activities coming under the special and
technical training and knowledge of such agency.[2] It has also been held that the
cralaw
exercise of administrative discretion is a policy decision and a matter that can best be
discharged by the government agency concerned, and not by the courts.[3] This Court
cralaw
[2] cralaw Republic v. Express Telecommunications, Co., Inc., 373 SCRA 316 (2002)
evaluation of evidence and in the exercise of its adjudicative functions. This latitude
includes the authority to take judicial notice of facts within its special competence.[5]
cralaw
The petitioners failed to present compelling reasons to warrant the deviation by this
Court from the foregoing salutary principles.
Likewise, the petitioners' Motion for Leave to File Attached Motion for Extension of
Time and Amended Petition for Review on Certiorari is DENIED.
The Opposition dated May 7, 2004 filed by the respondent, the Letters, in the
vernacular, dated May 8, 2004, of the Katutubong Palawan at Katutubong Mulbog ng
Barangay Sarong, Bataraza, Palawan and the undated Separate Letters, in the
vernacular, of the residents of Barangay Iwahig, Sarong, and Rio Tuba, Bataraza,
Palawan are NOTED.
Endnotes:
MALACAÑANG
MANILA
WHEREAS, it is the national policy to attain and maintain a rational and orderly
balance between socio-economic growth and environmental conservation and
protection;
WHEREAS, in the effective implementation of such a system, there arises the need to
identify and declare certain projects determined to be environmentally critical;
I. Heavy Industries
1. Logging
2. Major wood processing projects
3. Introduction of fauna (exotic-animals) in public/private forests
4. Forest occupancy
5. Extraction of mangrove products
6. Grazing
c. Fishery Projects
a. Major dams
b. Major power plants (fossil-fueled, nuclear fueled, hydroelectric or geothermal)
c. Major reclamation projects
d. Major roads and bridges
1. All areas declared by law as national parks, watershed reserves, wildlife preserves
and sanctuaries;
3. Areas which constitute the habitat for any endangered or threatened species of
indigenous Philippine Wildlife (flora and fauna);
12. Coral reefs characterized by one or any combinations of the following conditions:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the
Republic of the Philippines to be affixed.
Done in the City of Manila, this 14th day of December, in the year of Our Lord,
nineteen hundred and eighty-one.
(Sgd.)FERDINAND E. MARCOS
President of the Philippines
By the President:
(Sgd.) JUAN C. TUVERA
Presidential Executive Assistant
RP (Hon. Heherson Alvarez as Sec. Of the DENR, Clarence Baguilat as the Reg. Executive Dir. Of
DENR- Region XI and Engr. Bienvenido Lipa as Reg. Dir. Of the DENR-ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT BUREAU (DENR-EMB), Region XI v. THE CITY OF DAVAO
SYNOPSIS
Respondent filed an application for a Certificate of Non-Coverage (CNC) for its proposed project, the
Davao City Artica Sports Dome, with the Environmental Management Bureau (EMB), Region XI. The
same, however, was denied on the ground that the proposed project was within an environmentally
critical area; that the City of Davao must first undergo the environmental impact assessment (EIA)
process to secure an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC). Respondent then filed a petition for
mandamus with the Regional Trial Court (RTC), and the latter ruled in favor of respondent.
As the project in issue is not classified as environmentally critical or within an environmentally critical
area, the DENR has no choice but to issue the CNC. It becomes its ministerial duty, the performance of
which can be compelled by writ of mandamus, such as that issued herein by the trial court. The
petition filed by the Republic was denied.
SYLLABUS
1.POLITICAL LAW; ADMINISTRATIVE LAW; LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE; LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT;
FUNCTIONS. — Section 15 of Republic Act 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code,
defines a local government unit as a body politic and corporate endowed with powers to be exercised
by it in conformity with law. As such, it performs dual functions, governmental and proprietary.
Governmental functions are those that concern the health, safety and the advancement of the public
good or welfare as affecting the public generally. Proprietary functions are those that seek to obtain
special corporate benefits or earn pecuniary profit and intended for private advantage and benefit.
When exercising governmental powers and performing governmental duties, an LGU is an agency of
the national government. When engaged in corporate activities, it acts as an agent of the community
in the administration of local affairs. ASDTEa
2.ID.; ID.; ID.; ID.; NOT EXCLUDED FROM THE COVERAGE OF PD 1586 (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT SYSTEM). — Found in Section 16 of the Local Government Code is the duty of the LGUs to
promote the people’s right to a balanced ecology. Pursuant to this, an LGU, like the City of Davao, can
not claim exemption from the coverage of PD 1586. As a body politic endowed with governmental
functions, an LGU has the duty to ensure the quality of the environment, which is the very same
objective of PD 1586. Further, it is a rule of statutory construction that every part of a statute must be
interpreted with reference to the context, i.e., that every part must be considered with other parts,
and kept subservient to the general intent of the enactment. Section 4 of PD 1586 clearly states that
“no person, partnership or corporation shall undertake or operate any such declared environmentally
critical project or area without first securing an Environmental Compliance Certificate issued by the
President or his duly authorized representative.” The Civil Code defines a person as either natural or
juridical. The state and its political subdivisions, i.e., the local government units are juridical persons.
Undoubtedly therefore, local government units are not excluded from the coverage of PD 1586. Lastly,
very clear in Section 1 of PD 1586 that said law intends to implement the policy of the state to achieve
a balance between socio-economic development and environmental protection, which are the twin
goals of sustainable development. The first paragraph of the Whereas clause of the law stresses that
this can only be possible if we adopt a comprehensive and integrated environmental protection
program where all the sectors of the community are involved, i.e., the government and the private
sectors. The local government units, as part of the machinery of the government, cannot therefore be
deemed as outside the scope of the EIS system.
3.REMEDIAL LAW; EVIDENCE; FACTUAL FINDINGS OF THE TRIAL COURT, GENERALLY RESPECTED;
EXCEPTIONS. — The trial court, after a consideration of the evidence, found that the Artica Sports
Dome is not within an environmentally critical area. Neither is it an environmentally critical project. It
is axiomatic that factual findings of the trial court, when fully supported by the evidence on record,
are binding upon this Court and will not be disturbed on appeal. This Court is not a trier of facts.
There are exceptional instances when this Court may disregard factual findings of the trial court,
namely: a) when the conclusion is a finding grounded entirely on speculations, surmises, or
conjectures; b) when the inference made is manifestly mistaken, absurd, or impossible; c) where
there is a grave abuse of discretion; d) when the judgment is based on a misapprehension of facts; e)
when the findings of fact are conflicting; f) when the Court of Appeals, in making its findings, went
beyond the issues of the case and the same are contrary to the admissions of both appellant and
appellee; g) when the findings of the Court of Appeals are contrary to those of the trial court; h) when
the findings of fact are conclusions without citation of specific evidence on which they are based; i)
when the finding of fact of the Court of Appeals is premised on the supposed absence of evidence but
is contradicted by the evidence on record; and j) when the Court of Appeals manifestly overlooked
certain relevant facts not disputed by the parties and which, if properly considered, would justify a
different conclusion. None of these exceptions, however, obtain in this case.
4.ID.; SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS; MANDAMUS; PROPER FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF A MINISTERIAL DUTY.
— The Artica Sports Dome in Langub is not classified as environmentally critical, or within an
environmentally critical area. Consequently, the DENR has no choice but to issue the Certificate of
Non-Coverage. It becomes its ministerial duty, the performance of which can be compelled by writ of
mandamus, such as that issued by the trial court in the case at bar.
FACTS:
1. August 11, 2000- respondent filed an application for a Certificate of Non-Coverage (CNC) for
its proposed project, the “Davao City Artica Sports Dome”, with the EMB- Region XI ;
attached to the application
2. EMB Region XI denied the application after finding that the proposed project was within an
environmentally critical area
a. Basis: Section 2, Presidential Decree No. 1586, otherwise known as the Environmental
Impact Statement System, in relation to Section 4 of Presidential Decree No. 1151,
also known as the Philippine Environment Policy the City of Davao must undergo
the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process to secure an Environmental
Compliance Certificate (ECC), before it can proceed with the construction of its
project
3. Respondent filed a petition for mandamus and injunction with the RTC of Davao with the ff.
Allegations:
a. project was neither an environmentally critical project nor within an environmentally
critical area
b. it was the ministerial duty of the DENR to issue a CNC in favor of respondent upon
submission of the required documents
4. RTC ruled in favour of the City of Davao and hence directed the DENR ro issue the CNC for
the project (PD 1586 as basis)
a. Ratio:
i. there is nothing in PD 1586, in relation to PD 1151 and Letter of Instruction
No. 1179 (prescribing guidelines for compliance with the EIA system),
which requires LGUs to comply with the EIS law.
ii. Only agencies and instrumentalities of the national government, including
GOCC’s, as well as private corporations, firms and entities are mandated to
go through the EIA process for their proposed projects which have
significant effect on the quality of the environment.
iii. A local government unit, not being an agency or instrumentality of the
National Government, is deemed excluded under the principle of expressio
unius est exclusio alterius
iv. based on the certifications of the DENR- CENRO, site for the Artica Sports
Dome was not within an environmentally critical area . It therefore
becomes mandatory for the DENR, through the EMB Region XI, to approve
respondent's application for CNC after it has satisfied all the requirements
for its issuance
5. Petitioner filed a MR but it was denied.
6. Hence, this petition.
*Notes:
ISSUE:
WON the LGU’s are excluded from the coverage of PD 1586, one which requires an environmental
impact assessment (EIA) process to secure an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC)
HELD:
No.
1.) Section 4 of PD 1586 - "no person, partnership or corporation shall undertake or operate
any such declared environmentally critical project or area without first securing an
Environmental Compliance Certificate issued by the President or his duly authorized
representative."
a. LGU’s are juridical persons
2.) Section 1 of PD 1586 - law intends to implement the policy of the state to achieve a balance
between socio-economic development and environmental protection, which are the twin
goals of sustainable development
a. Whereas clause stresses that this can only be possible if we adopt a comprehensive
and integrated environmental protection program where all the sectors of the
community are involved, i.e., the government and the private sectors. The local
government units, as part of the machinery of the government, cannot therefore be
deemed as outside the scope of the EIS system.
3.) HOWEVER, after consideration of the evidence finding Artica Sports Dome is not within an
environmentally critical area neither being a critical project... findings of the trial court
becomes binding with the SC
4.) The Artica Sports Dome in Langub does not come close to any of the projects or areas
enumerated in Presidential 2146 (proclaiming areas and types of projects as environmentally
critical and w/in scope of the EIS). Neither is it analogous to any of them. It is clear, therefore,
that the said project is not classified as environmentally critical, or within an environmentally
critical area. Consequently, the DENR has no choice but to issue the Certificate of
Non-Coverage. It becomes its ministerial duty, the performance of which can be compelled
by writ of mandamus, such as that issued by the trial court in the case at bar. ^ TC affirmed ^
TITLE XIV
CHAPTER 1
General Provisions
SECTION 1. Declaration of Policy.—(1) The State shall ensure, for the benefit of the
Filipino people, the full exploration and development as well as the judicious
disposition, utilization, management, renewal and conservation of the country’s forest,
mineral, land, waters, fisheries, wildlife, off-shore areas and other natural resources,
consistent with the necessity of maintaining a sound ecological balance and protecting
and enhancing the quality of the environment and the objective of making the
exploration, development and utilization of such natural resources equitably
accessible to the different segments of the present as well as future generations.
(2) The State shall likewise recognize and apply a true value system that takes into
account social and environmental cost implications relative to the utilization,
development and conservation of our natural resources.
(2) It shall, subject to law and higher authority, be in charge of carrying out the State’s
constitutional mandate to control and supervise the exploration, development,
utilization, and conservation of the country’s natural resources.
(1) Assure the availability and sustainability of the country’s natural resources
through judicious use and systematic restoration or replacement, whenever possible;
(2) Increase the productivity of natural resources in order to meet the demands for the
products from forest, mineral, land and water resources of a growing population;
(3) Enhance the contribution of natural resources for achieving national economic and
social development;
(4) Promote equitable access to natural resources by the different sectors of the
population; and
(5) Conserve specific terrestrial and marine areas representative of the Philippine
natural and cultural heritage for present and future generations.
(1) Advise the President and the Congress on the enactment of laws relative to the
exploration, development, use, regulation and conservation of the country’s natural
resources and the control of pollution;
(3) Promulgate rules and regulations in accordance with law governing the
exploration, development, conservation, extraction, disposition, use and such other
commercial activities tending to cause the depletion and degradation of our natural
resources;
(4) Exercise supervision and control over forest lands, alienable and disposable public
lands, mineral resources and, in the process of exercising such control, impose
appropriate taxes, fees, charges, rentals and any such form of levy and collect such
revenues for the exploration, development, utilization or gathering of such resources;
(6) Promote proper and mutual consultation with the private sector on matters
involving natural resources exploration, development, use and conservation;
(7) Undertake geological surveys of the whole country including its territorial waters;
(8) Issue licenses and permits for activities related to the use and development of
aquatic resources, treasure hunting, salvaging of sunken vessels and other similar
activities;
(d) Preservation of cultural and natural heritage through wildlife conservation and
segregation of national parks and other protected areas;
(a) Accelerate cadastral and emancipation patent surveys, land use planning and
public land titling;
(c) Expedite mineral resources surveys, promote the production of metallic and
non-metallic minerals and encourage mineral marketing;
(11) Assess, review and provide direction to, in coordination with concerned
government agencies, energy research and development programs, including
identification of sources of energy and determination of their commercial feasibility
for development;
(12) Regulate the development, disposition, extraction, exploration and use of the
country’s forest, land, water and mineral resources;
(13) Assume responsibility for the assessment, development, protection, licensing and
regulation as provided for by law, where applicable, of all energy and natural
resources; the regulation and monitoring of service contractors, licensees, lessees, and
permit for the extraction, exploration, development and use of natural resources
products; the implementation of programs and measures with the end in view of
promoting close collaboration between the government and the private sector; the
effective and efficient classification and sub-classification of lands of the public
domain; and the enforcement of natural resources and environmental laws, rules and
regulations;
(14) Promulgate rules, regulations and guidelines on the issuance of licenses, permits,
concessions, lease agreements and such other privileges concerning the development,
exploration and utilization of the country’s marine, freshwater, and brackish water
and over all aquatic resources of the country and shall continue to oversee, supervise
and police our natural resources; cancel or cause to cancel such privileges upon
failure, non-compliance or violations of any regulation, order, and for all other causes
which are in furtherance of the conservation of natural resources and supportive of the
national interest;
(15) Exercise exclusive jurisdiction on the management and disposition of all lands of
the public domain and serve as the sole agency responsible for classification,
sub-classification, surveying and titling of lands in consultation with appropriate
agencies;
(16) Implement measures for the regulation and supervision of the processing of
forest products, grading and inspection of lumber and other forest products and
monitoring of the movement of timber and other forest products;
(17) Promulgate rules and regulations for the control of water, air and land pollution;
(18) Promulgate ambient and effluent standards for water and air quality including the
allowable levels of other pollutants and radiations;
(19) Promulgate policies, rules and regulations for the conservation of the country’s
genetic resources and biological diversity, and endangered habitats;
CHAPTER 2
(1) Advise the President on the promulgation of rules, regulations and other issuances
relative to the conservation, management, development and proper use of the
country’s natural resources;
(2) Establish policies and standards for the efficient and effective operations of the
Department in accordance with the programs of the government;
(3) Promulgate rules, regulations and other issuances necessary in carrying out the
Department’s mandate, objectives, policies, plans, programs and projects.
(4) Exercise supervision and control over all functions and activities of the
Department;
(6) Perform such other functions as may be provided by law or assigned by the
President.
(2) Exercise supervision and control over the offices, services, operating units and
officers and employees under his responsibility;
(3) Promulgate rules and regulations, consistent with Department policies, that will
efficiently and effectively govern the activities of units under his responsibility;
(4) Coordinate the functions and activities of the units under his responsibility with
those of other units under the responsibility of other Undersecretaries;
(5) Exercise such authority on substantive and administrative matters related to the
functions and activities of units under his responsibility to the extent granted by the
Secretary through administrative issuances; and
(6) Perform such other functions as may be provided by law or assigned by the
Secretary.
SECTION 11. Public Affairs Office.—The Public Affairs Office, under the Office of
the Secretary, shall be headed by a Director to be assisted by an Assistant Director,
and shall serve as the public information arm of the Department. It shall be
responsible for disseminating information on natural resources development policies,
plans, programs and projects and respond to public queries related to the development
and conservation of natural resources.
SECTION 12. Special Concerns Office.—The Special Concerns Office, also under
the Office of the Secretary, shall be headed by a Director to be assisted by an
Assistant Director, and shall be responsible for handling priority areas or subjects
identified by the Secretary which necessitate special and immediate attention.
CHAPTER 3
(1) Recommend policies and/or programs for the effective protection, development,
occupancy, management and conservation of forest lands and watersheds, including
the grazing and mangrove areas; reforestation and rehabilitation of critically denuded
or degraded forest reservations, improvement of water resource use and development,
development of national parks, preservation of wilderness areas, game refuges and
wildlife sanctuaries, ancestral lands, wilderness areas and other natural preserves,
development of forest plantations, including rattan, bamboo, and other valuable
non-timber forest resources; and rationalization of the wood-based industries,
regulation of the utilization and exploitation of forest resources, including wildlife, to
ensure continuous supply of forest and goods and services;
(2) Advise the regional offices in the implementation of the above policies and/or
programs;
(4) Assist in the monitoring and evaluation of forestry and watershed development
projects to ensure efficiency and effectiveness;
(6) Perform such other functions as may be provided by law or assigned by the
Secretary.
It shall advise the Secretary on matters pertaining to rational land management and
disposition and shall have the following functions:
(1) Recommend policies and programs for the efficient and effective administration,
surveys, management and disposition of alienable and disposable lands of the public
domain and other lands outside the responsibilities of other government agencies,
such as reclaimed areas and other areas not needed for or are not being utilized for the
purposes for which they have been established;
(2) Advise the Regional Offices on the efficient and effective implementation of
policies, programs and projects for more effective public lands management;
(3) Assist in the monitoring and evaluation of land surveys, management and
disposition of lands to ensure efficiency and effectiveness thereof;
(4) Issue standards, guidelines, regulations and orders to enforce policies for the
maximization of land use and development;
(5) Develop operating standards and procedures to promote the Bureau’s objectives
and functions; and
(6) Perform such other functions as may be provided by law or assigned by the
Secretary.
It shall advise the Secretary on matters pertaining to geology and mineral resources
exploration, development, utilization and conservation and shall:
(2) Advise the Secretary on the granting of mining rights and contracts over areas
containing metallic and non-metallic mineral resources;
(4) Recommend policies, regulations and oversee the development and exploitation of
mineral resources of the sea within the country’s jurisdiction such as silica sand, gold
placer, magnetic and chromite sand, etc;
(5) Assist in the monitoring and evaluation of the Bureau’s programs and projects to
ensure efficiency and effectiveness thereof;
(6) Develop and promulgate standards and operating procedures on mineral resources
development and geology;
(7) Supervise and control the development and packaging of nationally applicable
technologies on geological survey, mineral resource assessment, mining and
metallurgy; the provision of geological, metallurgical, chemical and rock mechanics
laboratory services; the conduct of marine geological and geophysical survey and
natural exploration drilling programs; and
(8) Perform such other functions as may be provided by law or assigned by the
Secretary.
(2) Advise the Regional Offices in the efficient and effective implementation of
policies, programs, and projects for the effective and efficient environmental
management and pollution control;
(3) Formulate environmental quality standards such as the quality standards for water,
air, land, noise and radiations;
(4) Recommend rules and regulations for environmental impact assessments and
provide technical assistance for their implementation and monitoring;
(5) Formulate rules and regulations for the proper disposition of solid wastes, toxic
and hazardous substances;
(6) Advise the Secretary on the legal aspects of environmental management and
pollution control and assist in the conduct of public hearings in pollution cases;
(8) Coordinate the inter-agency committees that may be created for the preparation of
the State of the Philippine Environment Report and the National Conservation
Strategy;
(9) Provide assistance to the Regional Offices in the formulation and dissemination of
information on environmental and pollution matters to the general public;
(10) Assist the Secretary and the Regional Officers by providing technical assistance
in the implementation of environmental and pollution laws; and
It shall:
(2) Assist the Secretary in determining a system of priorities for the allocation of
resources to various technological research programs of the department;
(4) Generate technologies and provide scientific assistance in the research and
development of technologies relevant to the sustainable uses of Philippine ecosystems
and natural resources; and
(5) Assist the Secretary in the evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation of
the integrated research program.
The Ecosystems Research and Development Bureau shall directly manage and
administer the Forest Research Institute Research Offices, laboratories, and forest
experiment stations located at UP Los Baños and such other field laboratories as the
Secretary may assign to its direct supervision. The Bureau shall coordinate all
technological researches undertaken by the field offices, assess and translate all
recommendable findings and disseminate such findings for all possible users and
clientele.
SECTION 19. Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau.—The Protected Areas and
Wildlife Bureau, to be headed by a Director and assisted by an Assistant Director,
shall absorb the Division of Parks and Wildlife and the Marine Parks Program of the
Bureau of Forest Development as well as the Calauit Game Preserve and Wildlife
Sanctuary, Presidential Committee on the Conservation of Tamaraw, Ninoy Aquino
Parks and Wildlife Center (formerly Parks and Wildlife Nature Center), shares in
Kabuhayan Program and Agro Forestry State Projects of the KKK Processing
Authority, all national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and game preserves previously
managed and administered by the Ministry of Human Settlements including National
Parks Reservation situated in the provinces of Bulacan, Rizal, Laguna and Quezon
formerly declared as Bagong Lipunan Sites of said Ministry, Magat Forest
Reservation and Mt. Arayat National Park, formerly with the Ministry of Tourism.
(1) Formulate and recommend policies, guidelines, rules and regulations for the
establishment and management of an Integrated Protected Areas Systems such as
national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and refuge, marine parks, and biospheric reserves;
(2) Formulate and recommend policies, guidelines, rules and regulations for the
preservation of biological diversity, genetic resources, the endangered Philippine flora
and fauna;
(3) Prepare an up-to-date listing of endangered flora and fauna and recommend a
program of conservation and propagation of the same;
(4) Assist the Secretary in the monitoring and assessment of the management of the
Integrated Protected Areas System and provide technical assistance to the Regional
Offices in the implementation of programs for these areas; and
(5) Perform such other functions as may be provided by law or assigned by the
Secretary.
CHAPTER 4
SECTION 20. Field Offices of the Department.—The field offices of the Department
are the Environmental and Natural Resources Regional Offices in the thirteen (13)
administrative regions of the country; the Environment and Natural Resources
Provincial Office in every province, and the Community Office in every municipality,
whenever deemed necessary.
(1) Implement laws, policies, plans, programs, projects, rules and regulations of the
Department to promote the sustainability and productivity of natural resources, social
equity in natural resource utilization and environmental protection;
(3) Coordinate with regional offices of other departments, offices, agencies in the
region and local government units in the enforcement of natural resource conservation
laws and regulations, and in the formulation/implementation of natural resource
programs and projects;
(4) Recommend and, upon approval, implement programs and projects on forestry,
minerals, and land management and disposition;
(6) Evolve respective regional budget in conformity with the priorities established by
the Regional Development Councils;
(7) Supervise the processing of natural resources products, grade and inspect minerals,
lumber and other wood processed products, and monitor the movement of these
products;
(8) Conduct field researches for appropriate technologies recommended for various
projects; and
(9) Perform such other functions as may be provided by law or assigned by the
Secretary.
CHAPTER 5
The agencies attached to the Department shall continue to operate and function in
accordance with the respective laws creating them, except as otherwise provided in
this Code.