Sunteți pe pagina 1din 5

10/17/2018 A Brief Note on Tolkien’s Influence on Fantasy | Cirsova

Cirsova

An encyclopedia of the Cirsovan empire, thoughts on


Gaming, Music and more.

A Brief Note on Tolkien’s Influence on Fantasy

Posted by Cirsova on September 20, 2017


Inspired by J. Manfred Weichsel’s remark describing Fri Leiber’s “Swords and Deviltry” as “a mix of Dunsany,
Tolkien, and Piers Anthony.”

Tolkien is often heralded as the lord and father of Fantasy, but consider the following:

The Sword & Sorcery genre predates the Lord of the Rings by decades.

All of the classic first wave Sword & Sorcery had been wri en and was already old news when Lord of
the Rings came out. Lord of the Rings was published at the very tail end of the Pulp Era, and would’ve
likely had very li le immediate influence on those writers.

Robert E Howard’s, C.L. Moore’s, and many of Fri Leiber’s Sword and Sorcery stories predate the Lord
of the Rings. Even relative late-comer and Edgar Rice Burroughs fan-boy Philip Jose Farmer had already
won a Hugo Award a year before the Lord of the Rings was published.

It would be interesting to see how much, if any, influence the Hobbit had; compared to much of the
fantasy contemporary with it, this debut is relatively straight-forward: a guy goes on a long walk with
strangers who press-gang him and gets some treasure from a dragon. The Ring is just a plot device, and
the encounter with Gollum part in a series of episodic encounters on the way to said dragon. Given the
corpus of fantasy fiction upon which the 1920s and 1930s Sword & Sorcery genre was building, it’s hard
to imagine The Hobbit making a significant splash or being regarded as any kind of “serious seminal
work” by the writers hard at work crafting the foundations of the modern fantasy genre.

I really don’t think there is a smoking gun; you probably are not going to find any of the important and
influential fantasy writers from the pulp-era saying in the 1930s or 1940s “Man, that Tolkien guy is
gonna change the way people read and write Fantasy forever!” If there is, though, I’d love to see it!
ADVERTISEMENT

https://cirsova.wordpress.com/2017/09/20/a-brief-note-on-tolkiens-influence-on-fantasy/ 1/5
10/17/2018 A Brief Note on Tolkien’s Influence on Fantasy | Cirsova
Advertisements

REPORT THIS AD

REPORT THIS AD
This entry was posted in Books and tagged fantasy, JRR Tolkien, Lord of the Rings, pulp, science fiction,
sff, Sword & Sorcery, the Hobbit, Tolkien. Bookmark the permalink.

9 responses to “A Brief Note on Tolkien’s Influence


on Fantasy”

DMR says:
September 20, 2017 at 10:23 am
“you probably are not going to find any of the important and influential fantasy writers from the
pulp-era saying in the 1930s or 1940s “Man, that Tolkien guy is gonna change the way people read
and write Fantasy forever!””

It’s hard enough to find people who said that in the ’50s when Lord of the Rings came out.

Reply
Cirsova says:
September 20, 2017 at 10:30 am
Yeah.
https://cirsova.wordpress.com/2017/09/20/a-brief-note-on-tolkiens-influence-on-fantasy/ 2/5
10/17/2018 A Brief Note on Tolkien’s Influence on Fantasy | Cirsova

It’s funny; someone sent me this article, and comments range from “You’re a acking a strawman”
to “nuh, uh, Tolkien IS the father of fantasy!”

h ps://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2013/12/22/sorry-tolkien-not-father-
fantasy/pljM6NOC54JmFaqY8bzNSI/story.html#comments

It’s a tough topic to even broach without coming across as ‘an a ack on the master’.

At this point, I’d be interested in any pre-Lord of the Rings critical reception of Tolkien. I have
vague recollection of one from years ago that wrote off The Hobbit as a dumb and ponderous
book with elves, but can’t for the life of me remember the source of it.

Reply
-allyoustories- says:
September 20, 2017 at 11:31 am
Sword and Sorcery and Tolkien developed independently I think. Tolkien began writing his Middle
Earth stories in 1919 even though The Hobbit wasn’t published until 1937, and The Lord of Rings in
1954. The Hobbit was wri en as a children’s book, not as a serious work of fiction and Tolkien’s work
didn’t gain real a ention until the 60s. Tolkien’s influence, from what I have read, had more of an
effect on writers in the 60s and on. Moorcock wanted to write anti-Tolkien stories, Terry Brooks
wrote The Sword of Shannara, etc.

I think that because the popularity of Sword and Sorcery waned as Epic Fantasy’s waxed, the
perception people had was that Tolkien was the “father of fantasy” because all the popular fantasy
being put out was like Tolkien’s work.

Reply
H.P. says:
September 20, 2017 at 1:10 pm
I flipped through a few books and couldn’t find anything particularly relevant. The Hobbit won
awards, received very favorable reviews, and sold relatively well, but that doesn’t tell us very much.

I’m not surprised that people will react negatively and vigorously so, but nothing you’re saying is at
odds with the conventional wisdom: The Lord of the Rings only became huge after the unauthorized
US paperback release and the influence of LOTR on fantasy kicked off in earnest in 1977 with the
publication of The Sword of Shannara.

Reply
H.P. says:
September 20, 2017 at 1:16 pm
It occurs to me that you could write a good and original book on Tolkien by focusing on his fantasy
influences (he read and liked both Burroughs and Howard) and his early influence in turn (pre-
Shannara).

Reply
Cirsova says:
September 20, 2017 at 3:45 pm
Yeah. I’d read that.

Reply
The Alt-Right DM says:
https://cirsova.wordpress.com/2017/09/20/a-brief-note-on-tolkiens-influence-on-fantasy/ 3/5
10/17/2018 A Brief Note on Tolkien’s Influence on Fantasy | Cirsova

September 20, 2017 at 7:52 pm


People usually throw in that weasel word, “modern” so they can claim their special author was the
REAL first person to do the thing. Tolkein was the first “Modern Fantasy” author, if you define
“modern” as being “Tolkein pastiche”.

Kind of like how modern sci-fi was invented by a woman because the REAL start date of sci-fi is
Frankenstein.

Reply
herbn says:
September 21, 2017 at 11:26 am
-allyourstories- is right, they are separate strands mostly drawing on different sources.

However, in terms of fantasy as a modern publishing genre I think Tolkien does deserve pride of
place. The separation of “fantasy” as a publishing genre from other fantastic tales is arguably
relatively late, about 15-20 later than Sci-Fi and Horror. The authors you mention are often science
fantasy, and thus generally published as Sci-Fi, or in broad fantastic spectrum.

The breakthrough fantasy novel wasn’t LotR but that warmed over version “The Sword of
Shannara”. Hippies had been reading LotR and TSoS was bought as an a empt to cash in on it. It did
and succeeded and publishers started scouring for more. Also, authors wanted to write their LotR.
Stephen King says The Dark Tower is his LotR in terms of when he started to think about it and write
it. Eddings and McKiernan both started from Tolkien influences, the former mixing his reading of the
same medieval sources as Tolkien into his books. The later is, IMHO, one of the most under-rated
writers of fantasy because of his writing a blatant LotR rewrite to provide backstory for his first book
yet Dragondoom is one of the best quest fantasy novels out there.

So as publishers embraced fantasy it was via a template built heavily on Tolkien and as a result a lot
of modern fantasy refers to him (or D&D) more than Burroughs, Howard, Moore, or Dunsany even
though the last of that list was a normal pastiche phase as late as the 70s.

As a result Tolkien looms larger than he should for now. However, in 100 years I think it will be more
balanced. Even then, though, he will be recognized as the figure in quest centered fantasy and I think
reasonably so.

Reply
Cirsova says:
September 21, 2017 at 11:36 am
Good points, though much of Dunsany, who influenced those Science Fantasy writers and was still
writing contemporarily with many of them, is definitely “Fantasy” in the sense that it is understood
today and separate from Science Fantasy.

From what I’ve found, Tolkien was a fan of Dunsany, which is not surprising, I suppose, considering
how Dunsanian much of the Silmarillion feels (particularly the earlier sections involving the creation
of the world and races).

Reply

Blog at WordPress.com.
https://cirsova.wordpress.com/2017/09/20/a-brief-note-on-tolkiens-influence-on-fantasy/ 4/5
10/17/2018 A Brief Note on Tolkien’s Influence on Fantasy | Cirsova

https://cirsova.wordpress.com/2017/09/20/a-brief-note-on-tolkiens-influence-on-fantasy/ 5/5

S-ar putea să vă placă și