Sunteți pe pagina 1din 153

February 2015

DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND EMERGENCY


SERVICES

Workplace Contaminant
Investigation – Success
Career Fire and Rescue
Station

Submitted to:
Department of Fire and Emergency Services
Emergency Services Complex
20 Stockton Bend
COCKBURN CENTRAL WA 6164
REPORT

Report Number. 1413531-001-R-Rev1


Distribution:
1 Electronic Copy – Department of Fire and
Emergency Services
1 Electronic Copy – Golder Associates Pty Ltd
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

List of Acronyms
Acronym Description
ADWG Australian Drinking Water Guidelines
AFFF Aqueous film forming foam
ARMCANZ Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand
ANZECC Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council
ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
COC Chain of custody
COI Chemicals of interest
CSM Conceptual site model
DER Department of Environment Regulation
DFES Department of Fire and Emergency Services
DoH Department of Health
DOW Department of Water
EDI Estimated daily intake
g Gram
µg Microgram (0.001 mg or 0.00001 g)
HAA Haloacetic acids
HIL Health investigation level
HIL A Health investigation level - low density residential
HIL B Health investigation level - high density residential
LOR Limit of reporting
mg Milligram (1/1000 of a g)
NA Not applicable
NATA National Association of Testing Authorities
NEPM National Environmental Protection Measure
NHMRC National Health and Medical Research Council
PCE Tetrachloroethylene (also called Perchloroethylene)
PFOA Perflourooctanoic acid
PFOS Perflourooctane sulfonate
PID Photo-ionisation detector
PSI Preliminary Site Investigation
QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control
TDI Tolerable Daily Intake
THM Total trihalomethanes
TPS Town Planning Scheme
UFU of WA United Firefighters Union of Western Australia
US EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
VOC Volatile organic compound
WALIS Western Australian Land Information System.
WHO World Health Organisation
WTCIATFWG World Trade Center Indoor Air Task Force Working Group

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 1
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

List of Terms
Term Description
Analytes A substance or chemical constituent that is of interest in an analytical procedure.
Buffer A separation distance between land uses.
Contaminated Site A site registered on the DER Contaminated Sites Database.
Effluent Outflow from a sewer or sewage system.
Environmental media Refers to air, soil and water.
Are chemicals that promote the clumping together of suspended particles in liquids
Flocculants
to form a floc.
GhostWipes A brand of swipes used for environmental sampling.
Groundwater is the water located beneath the earth's surface in soil pore spaces
Groundwater
and in the fractures of rock formations.
HAA A by-product of treatment of potable water.
Is the lowest concentration at which an analyte can be detected in a sample and its
LOR
concentration can be reported with a reasonable degree of accuracy and precision
Pathway The connection or connections between a source and the receptor.
Polyelectrolyte Are polymers whose repeating units bear an electrolyte group.
A photoionization detector is a type of gas detector.
Typical photoionization detectors measure volatile organic compounds and other
PID gases in an efficient and inexpensive detector for many gas and vapour analytes.
These hand-held, battery-operated detectors are widely used in military, industrial,
and confined working facilities for safety.
A PSI is the term used to describe the first stage of the process under the
Contaminated Sites Act that includes investigation of records and anecdotal
PSI
material and a site walkover looking for signs of contamination. PSI is a screening
level assessment under the Contaminated Sites Act.
Receptor The person, group, species or environment that may be impacted.
Can be described as a hazard or the presence of a hazard in an environmental
Source
medium that has the capacity to cause harm
Surface water is water on the surface of the planet such as in a drain, stream, river,
Surface Water
lake, wetland, or ocean.
THM A by-product of treatment of potable water
VOC A compound that produces vapour or gas at room temperature
A Town Planning scheme divides the local government district into zones to identify
Zone
areas for particular uses and development allowed in different zones.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 2
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 6

2.0 PURPOSE AND APPROACH ................................................................................................................................... 7

3.0 PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 9

3.1 Overview and Purpose ................................................................................................................................. 9

3.2 Site Description............................................................................................................................................. 9

3.2.1 Site Identification ..................................................................................................................................... 9

3.2.2 Local Government Area and Zoning ....................................................................................................... 9

3.2.3 DER Contaminated Sites Database ...................................................................................................... 10

3.2.4 WA Land Information System ............................................................................................................... 10

3.3 Historical Aerial Photography...................................................................................................................... 10

3.4 Groundwater ............................................................................................................................................... 11

3.5 Surrounding Land use ................................................................................................................................ 11

3.5.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 11

3.5.2 Potential contaminating activities from surrounding land use................................................................ 12

3.6 Site Walkover.............................................................................................................................................. 12

3.7 Preliminary Site Investigation Outcome ...................................................................................................... 13

4.0 HUMAN HEALTH EXPOSURE ............................................................................................................................... 14

4.1 Exposure Model .......................................................................................................................................... 14

4.2 Contaminant Transport ............................................................................................................................... 14

4.3 Exposure Pathways .................................................................................................................................... 15

5.0 SITE SAMPLING ..................................................................................................................................................... 16

5.1 Chemicals of Interest .................................................................................................................................. 16

5.2 Sampling Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 17

5.2.1 Air Quality Sampling.............................................................................................................................. 17

5.2.2 Groundwater Sampling ......................................................................................................................... 18

5.2.3 Surface Water Sampling ....................................................................................................................... 18

5.2.4 Tap Water Sampling ............................................................................................................................. 19

5.2.5 Swab and Soil Sampling ....................................................................................................................... 19

5.2.5.1 Swab .................................................................................................................................................. 19

5.2.5.2 Soil..................................................................................................................................................... 19

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 3
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

6.0 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................................ 20

6.1 Interpretation of Laboratory Results............................................................................................................ 20

6.2 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................................... 20

6.3 Groundwater ............................................................................................................................................... 20

6.4 Swab Sampling ........................................................................................................................................... 21

6.5 Soil.............................................................................................................................................................. 22

6.6 Surface Water Sampling ............................................................................................................................. 22

6.7 Tap Water ................................................................................................................................................... 22

6.7.1 Sample Result....................................................................................................................................... 22

6.7.2 Water Supply ........................................................................................................................................ 22

6.7.3 Water Supply Overview......................................................................................................................... 23

6.7.4 Jandakot Water Treatment Plant Overview........................................................................................... 23

6.7.5 Water Treatment Sediment ................................................................................................................... 23

6.7.6 Water Supply Safety ............................................................................................................................. 24

6.7.7 Building water supply system failure ..................................................................................................... 24

7.0 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................................... 25

8.0 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................................... 27

9.0 LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................... 28

TABLES
Table 1: Coordinates of Site Boundary ............................................................................................................................... 9

Table 2: Contaminated Sites Summary ............................................................................................................................. 10

Table 3: Historical Aerial Photography Summary .............................................................................................................. 10

Table 4: Preliminary Exposure Pathway Assessment ....................................................................................................... 15

Table 5: Chemicals of Interest........................................................................................................................................... 16

Table 6: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Classification ................................................................... 16


2
Table 7: COI Screening Values (µg/m ) ............................................................................................................................ 21

FIGURES
Figure 1: Conceptual Site Model ......................................................................................................................................... 8

Figure 2: Investigation Outcome Conceptual Model .......................................................................................................... 26

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 4
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Figures

APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over

APPENDIX C
Chain of Custody

APPENDIX D
Calibration Certificates

APPENDIX E
Laboratory Results

APPENDIX F
Water Corporation Information

APPENDIX G
Jandakot Water Treatment Plant – Safety Data Sheets

APPENDIX H
Department of Health Fact Sheet

APPENDIX I
Limitations

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 5
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

1.0 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
There have been four reported cases of kidney (renal) cancer amongst the firefighters stationed at the
Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES) Success Fire Station, 365 Hammond Road Success
(the site), up to 21 November 2014. DFES has initiated a number of investigations into this matter to identify
if there is an identifiable cause and what control measures can be implemented to prevent further
occurrences.

DFES has reported the current known common elements across all four cases of kidney cancer are:

 all relate to career (full time) firefighters

 all have been stationed at the site, and

 all firefighters have been diagnosed with a form of kidney cancer.

DFES has sought to identify if there is a link between the site, and the incidents of kidney cancer. The site
was opened in 2000 and was staffed until 31 October 2014 when the firefighters were temporarily relocated
during the course of investigations.

On 14 October 2014 Golder was engaged by DFES to undertake an environmental investigation to assess if
there was evidence that contaminants present at the site and immediate surrounds could be associated with
the development of the cancers. Golder proposed an approach based on assessing the site history and
judgemental sampling to identify if there is a plausible link from the site to the diagnoses of cancer. Golder
has been advised by DFES of concurrent investigations including a biological monitoring program of the
Success firefighters and other firefighters who have previously worked at the station and an independent
epidemiological study initiated by the Department of Health (DoH) in Western Australia.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 6
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

2.0 PURPOSE AND APPROACH


The scope of Golder’s investigation deals with the environmental setting of the site and its immediate
surrounds. We have based our approach on the Source – Pathway – Receptor model, which is an accepted
and readily applicable approach to understanding how potentially harmful substances can make their way
through the environment and cause harm to people, animals or plants. In this case, the receptors are the
firefighters working at the site. The assessment of potential sources and pathways was the focus of the
investigation. Information gathered to inform this model included:

 A Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) in general accordance with the Department of Environment
Regulation (DER) Contaminated Sites Management Series.

 Judgemental sampling which included the development of a list of chemicals of interest (COI) from
substances known to be associated with the development of kidney cancer for the targeted screening
sampling and the sampling and analysis of site media (soil, water and air) for those COI.

 Comparison of the COI sample results against health investigation levels or environmental values.

The list of COI was also informed by concerns raised by the firefighters during a site visit on the
18 October 2014 and a meeting held at the site on 31 October 2014 and also from concerns raised by the
firefighters and passed onto Golder by DFES representatives.

We have presented the Source – Pathway – Receptor model in the form of a conceptual site model (CSM) to
help communicate the interpretation of the results. The CSM is presented in Figure 1 below and provides
the potential sources, pathways and the sampling approach.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 7
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

Sources Areas of Interest Exposure Pathways Sampling Receptors

Inhalation Volatile Organic


Groundwater beneath Compound (VOC)
the site in air
Groundwater Direct Contact

Groundwater upgradient Inhalation VOC in air and


of the site and at the site groundwater from
Direct Contact nearby reticulation
supply

On-site soil Inhalation Surface swab


Surface soil near boot
(dust) and near
washing area and garden.
surface soil

Success Fire Fighters


On-site dust/surface Surface dusts Direct Contact sampling

Inhalation Surface swab


(dust) and near
Off-site soil/dust Surface dusts
surface soil
Direct Contact sampling

Inhalation
Off-site surface water Stormwater drain Surface water
sampling in drain
Direct Contact

Ingestion
Tap water
Drinking water Tap water at the site sampling
Direct Contact

Potentially complete exposure pathway Incomplete exposure pathway

Figure 1: Conceptual Site Model

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 8
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

3.0 PRELIMINARY SITE INVESTIGATION SUMMARY


3.1 Overview and Purpose
The objective of the PSI was to review the site history and land uses to assess whether or not further
investigation at the site is warranted.

The PSI includes descriptions of the following aspects of the site:

 Historical aerial photograph review and review of current planning and zoning information

 DER Contaminated Sites Database search

 Assessment of current and historical activities on the site and surrounding areas which have the
potential to result in contamination consistent with the identified COI

 Site walkover

 Preparation of a report based on the findings of the PSI and walkover.


3.2 Site Description
3.2.1 Site Identification
The site is approximately 1 ha in size and is located approximately 800 m west of the Kwinana Freeway and
2 km south of Beeliar Drive as shown in Appendix A, Figure F00A. Approximate coordinates of the facility’s
boundary are listed in Table 1 and its boundaries are shown in Appendix A, Figure F00B.
Table 1: Coordinates of Site Boundary
Corner Easting (m) Northing (m)
1 391232 6442467
2 391292 6442468
3 391292 6442404
4 391238 6442403
5 391232 6442409

3.2.2 Local Government Area and Zoning


The Site is located on Hammond Road and is zoned ‘Public Purpose – Fire Station’ under TPS No. 3.
Reserve No. 7756 surrounds the station which is zoned Parks and Recreation. The local planning scheme
for the City of Cockburn (Scheme 3), Map No.14 showing the zoning allocation is provided in Appendix A,
Figure F00C.

The site’s western boundary abuts land zoned as ‘other regional roads’ (Hammond Road). West is zoned
residential and to the east of the site is a recreational area then residential zoning which is bordered to the
east by land zoned primary regional roads (Kwinana Freeway).

A 10 ha wedge of land to the north-east of the reserve contains the Water Corporation Jandakot Water
Treatment Plant. A 200 m chlorine buffer surrounds this facility which borders the north-eastern corner of
Reserve No. 7756. The chlorine buffer is a requirement of the Environmental Protection Authority and
Department of Mines and Petroleum to safeguard neighbouring properties from the impact of chlorine
release events. When these events occur they are one-off short-term events. There have been no such
events at the water treatment plant since its commissioning. Residential development is prohibited within the
buffer. The water treatment plant is located on Reserve 35271 on the southern side of Bartram Road.
Previously a 300 m chlorine buffer applied to the water treatment plant; however, this was reduced to 200 m
in September 2004 following the upgrading of the plant.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 9
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

3.2.3 DER Contaminated Sites Database


The DER Contaminated Sites Database was searched on 24 November 2014. The site is not registered on
the database. There are no contaminated sites registered within the suburb of Success.

The DER Contaminated Sites Database provides an online publicly accessible database that shows sites
classified as “Contaminated – Remediation Required”, “Contaminated – Restricted Use” or “Remediated for
restricted use”.

There are remediated contaminated sites in the surrounding suburbs that are registered in the database.
Table 2 provides a summary of these sites with respect to the site:
Table 2: Contaminated Sites Summary
Distance and
Classification Previous Use Current Use
Direction
Remediated – Restricted Use (2007) 1.5 km SE Piggery Residential
Wool scouring and waste Commercial/Industrial
Remediated – Restricted Use (2009) 3.4 km N
water treatment Premises
Remediated – Restricted Use (2013) 4.2 km NNE Service Station Commercial

These sites listed on the register are not considered to present a source of chemicals of interest due to the
distance from the site, groundwater flow direction or the nature of the contaminants on which the
classification is based. Appendix A, Figure F00D shows the proximity of these sites relative to the fire
station.

3.2.4 WA Land Information System


A search of the Western Australian Land Information System (WALIS) database was performed on
16 October 2014. WALIS is a partnership of government agencies which promotes the State’s geographic
information. The online data consists of a collation of available information from these government agencies
including the DER.

No items of environmental significance were identified within the site boundary or within the immediate
vicinity of the site.

3.3 Historical Aerial Photography


Golder completed a review of the historical aerial photography for the site taken between 1953 and 2014.
A summary of the aerial photograph review is provided in Table 3. Historical aerial imagery is provided in
Appendix A, Figures F00E to F00N. The 2014 image can be viewed in Appendix A, Figure F00B.
Table 3: Historical Aerial Photography Summary
Year Success DFES Site Area Surrounding Area
1953 The site was entirely vegetated with what Immediately to the east of the site was mostly cleared
appears to be remnant native vegetation with some sparse vegetation, south, west and north of
rather than plantation. The current western the site were vegetated with what appeared to remnant
boundary was defined by a dirt road. native vegetation.
1965 Vegetation was less dense than in 1953, Some further land clearing/disturbance appeared to
especially in the north-west and west. The have occurred at the western boundary of the site.
current western boundary was defined by a Distinct lines were visible on the ground surface.
dirt road. The site may have been used for stock grazing or
agricultural purposes.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 10
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

Year Success DFES Site Area Surrounding Area


1974 Consistent with 1965. Again some further land clearing/disturbance appeared
to have occurred at the western boundary of the site
since 1965. At the north-west boundary of the site
some early construction of buildings is visible.
1979 Consistent with 1974 Consistent with 1974
1981 The current western boundary was defined At the western boundary of the site residential
by a gravel road. A dirt road is visible on properties are numerous along with land cleared for
the northern boundary of the site. what may have been stock grazing and agricultural
purposes.
1985 Consistent with 1981 Consistent with 1981
1995 A vehicle track is clear across the northern Consistent with 1981
section of the site. Proportion of site
vegetated and cleared consistent with 1981.
2002 A building is present with an adjoining car Consistent with 1995
park east of the site
2006 Consistent with 2002 Area at the western boundary of the site had been
cleared with a yellow-grey soil visible on the surface of
the site. Land to the north, south and east is consistent
with 1995.
2010 Consistent with 2002 Numerous residential developments are present to the
north-western and western boundary of the site.
A series of playing courts are present to the eastern
and southern boundary of the site along with a car
parking area.
2014 Consistent with 2010 Consistent with 2010

None of the industries, activities and land uses presented in the Contaminated Sites Management Series,
Potentially Contaminating Activities, Activities and Landuses, October 2004 were identified to have occurred
or been undertaken on the site (i.e. remnant vegetation and vehicle tracks) prior to its construction as a fire
station in 2000. The 2002 aerial photograph shows the Success Career Fire and Rescue Station building
and grounds.

3.4 Groundwater
The Department of Water (DOW) Perth Groundwater Atlas provides groundwater contours for the
Perth Metropolitan region and covers the site. Based on the contour maps, there is an east to west or
west south-west flow of groundwater at the site. Groundwater contours and flow are indicated on
Appendix A, Figure F00O.

Accordingly, groundwater impacts from registered contaminated sites to the north or south of the site are
unlikely to impact on groundwater quality at the site.

3.5 Surrounding Land use


3.5.1 Overview
The land to the west of Hammond Road was used for market gardens. Historical aerial photographs show
the use of land to the west of the station was predominantly market gardens until 2006. The 2010 aerial
photograph shows a shift in use to residential.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 11
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

The land to the north has been used as a water treatment plant since prior to 1981. In the 1981 aerial
photograph, the evaporation ponds that form part of the treatment plant are present and the rust colour
indicates the plant is in use. The water treatment plant was established sometime during 1979 as the
evaporation ponds are not present in the 1974 photograph. There is a noticeable increase in vegetation
surrounding the plant since 1981. The water treatment plant has been in operation since it was
commissioned.

The recreational facilities to the east of the site were developed in 2009/2010 with the official opening in
April 2010. The configuration is shown in the 2010 aerial photograph. Prior to this development the site was
surrounded by undeveloped land with natural remnant vegetation.

The surface drainage line to the north of the site along the southern boundary of the Water Corporation
facility is evident since 1965 and has retained the same alignment.

3.5.2 Potential contaminating activities from surrounding land use


Historical agricultural activities occurred over Hammond Road to the west of the site but not on the site itself.
These activities are not considered likely to present a significant risk of contamination as aerial photography
did not indicate the presence of buildings or infrastructure which may have been used for bulk chemical or
dangerous goods storage. It is anticipated that agricultural application of chemicals to soil in the surrounding
area may have occurred.

Spray drift may have occurred during the application of pesticides and this may provide a theoretical source
of contaminants, although not the COI. The year 1995 aerial photograph shows a series of buildings along
the western side of Hammond Road between the market garden and the future site. The planted area is
approximately 100 m from the site as shown in Appendix A, Figure F00K. The market gardens are located
down gradient of the site for both stormwater and groundwater; therefore not considered a potential source
for contamination of surface water or groundwater at the site.

Unknown wastes are not considered to be a significant risk for soil contamination. Based on site
observations and aerial photography the site was largely undisturbed until the construction of the fire station.
An unformed access track or fire break is evident in 1981 in the northern part of the site (running east to
west). This is more distinct in the 1995 aerial photograph. There is also no evidence of stockpiled materials
on or near the site that could be a source of soil contamination.

3.6 Site Walkover


A site walkover was conducted by Golder on 21 October 2014. Photos from the site walkover are provided
in Appendix B.

The main findings were:

 The site is located at 365 Hammond Road, Success. The station building has a sealed car park on its
southern boundary, Hammond Road on the west boundary, a stormwater drain along the northern
boundary and netball courts along the eastern boundary. There is a sealed parking area surrounding
the majority of the building with a small grassed section and landscaped garden along fence lines.

 The building was constructed in 1999/2000 and is of conventional building materials of that time.
The building has a concrete slab, brick walls and metal roof and is reflective of typical residential
construction with the exception of the large appliance room on the southern side of the building.
There have been no structural changes or additions since the original construction.

 There were no asbestos materials used in the construction of the building and a review of the building
specifications and visual inspection confirmed the absence of asbestos in construction materials.

 There is a small garden shed at the rear of the appliance room and a steel shade structure has been
built along the northern side of the building for car parking.

 The water supply to the station is mains supply only. No groundwater is used at the site.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 12
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

 There is an on-site Ecomax effluent disposal system installed on the southern side of the property.
The infiltration area for this system is unsealed and there is a mesh fence delineating this area from the
remainder of the property.

 The surface water drain along the northern boundary of the property flows east to west and provides
drainage for the surrounding area of the suburb.
1
 There are two cathodic protection posts, one on the property in the south-west corner and one in the
drainage reserve to the north-west. Both are installed adjacent to Hammond Road.

 The facility has been used as a fire station since opening in the year 2000.

 The parking area at the rear of the property (north-eastern portion) has been used for training purposes.
Various foams (prior to 2004, B Class foam was aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) and post 2004
Mercury Fire, Mercury B Class Sabo foams) have been used for training exercises at the site. We
understand that the foams listed are typical of the foams used by DFES and industry for firefighting.

 The surrounding land uses at the time of the site visit were observed as predominantly residential and
recreational (netball courts, oval and pavilion). Other than the Jandakot Water Treatment Plant to the
north-east, no industrial or commercial premises were located within close proximity (1 km) of the site.

 The use of the building at the site can be described as residential with limited maintenance activities of
vehicles and equipment undertaken.

 The building has four dormitory rooms (three twin rooms and a single) with shared ensuites. There is a
domestic style kitchen and meals area, office, study, and exercise and recreation rooms. The hose
room, tunic room and breathing apparatus service room are separated from the living area by the
appliance room.

3.7 Preliminary Site Investigation Outcome


As evident from the historical aerial photographs the land that now houses the fire station was previously
undeveloped and had natural remnant vegetation present since the early 1960s. The site was developed in
1999 when the DFES facility was constructed and then opened in 2000.

The land use around the site has had some changes over the years. The water treatment plant was
constructed around 1980 and the agricultural (market garden) use on neighbouring properties over
Hammond Road to the west has transitioned to residential use in the last 10 years. A recreational facility
was developed to the east of the site in 2009/2010.

The reserve to the north of the site is used for the Water Corporation’s water treatment plant. This plant
treats groundwater abstracted from several aquifers in the area for drinking water. The plant has been in
operation since the 1980s. The recreational facility that abuts the fire station to the east and car park to the
south was developed in 2009/2010 with the official opening in April 2010. Prior to this development the site
was surrounded by undeveloped land with natural remnant vegetation.

Based on the information in the contaminated sites database, the site history review and surrounding land
use, it is considered that there is no evidence that the site was contaminated under the Contaminated Sites
Act.

Accordingly, soil contamination and/or groundwater contamination from previous or surrounding landuse is
not considered a source for the cancer incidents.

1 is a technique used to control the corrosion of a metal surface by making it the cathode of an electrochemical cell

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 13
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

4.0 HUMAN HEALTH EXPOSURE


4.1 Exposure Model
The Source – Pathway – Receptor model provides the basis for assessing health risk. For there to be a
health risk all elements of the model need to be present.

A source can be described as a hazard or the presence of a hazard in an environmental medium that has
the potential to cause harm. An understanding of the concentration and properties of the source allow for
assessment of risk.

There needs to be a pathway, or pathways, that connect the receptor with the source. At conceptual level
there are three pathways to be considered in environmental exposure:

1) Inhalation –airborne contaminants and exposure via the respiratory system.

2) Ingestion – eating and drinking, hand to mouth transfer, incidental swallowing and exposure via the
gastrointestinal system.
3) Dermal contact – direct skin contact with the contaminant and absorption through the skin.

Once the source is known and the exposure pathways identified, the last element of the risk model is the
receptor. This refers to the people, animals or plants that could be affected by the source and the common
opportunities for exposure according to time and place. If all elements (source-pathway-receptor) are
present, there is a risk. The level of risk needs to be evaluated with consideration of the properties of the
COI and the exposure parameters (duration, frequency and magnitude).

The focus of this investigation is to identify if there are any contaminant sources at the site which have been
identified by regulatory authorities’ (ATSDR, National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC]) as
being associated with the development of renal cancer.

4.2 Contaminant Transport


Environmental contaminant sources may be as a result of on-site or off-site activities. The PSI did not
indicate the presence of an on-site source and no significant off-site sources were identified. However,
off-site sources were considered further: Possible pathways for these sources are:

 Air – direct and indirect emissions of gases, vapours, dust and particulates to the atmosphere.
Emissions of volatile contaminants from soil and groundwater.

 Surface water – including direct releases of contaminants to surface water or indirect, such as leaching
or surface runoff from impacted soil into drainage lines.

 Groundwater – including leaching of contaminants from soil to groundwater, a spill leaching to


groundwater, lateral migration of contaminants in groundwater.

The identification and consideration of contaminant transport mechanisms has been included in the
exposure pathway assessment.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 14
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

4.3 Exposure Pathways


As noted in the PSI, the use of the property and building at the site could be described as typical residential
use with minimal interaction with the property other than periodic garden maintenance. We understand there
was a vegetable garden maintained by firefighters. The building was constructed in the years 1999/2000
with typical construction materials for the age of the building. The building is used for office work, training,
sleeping, amenities and meals when on shift. The rear parking area is used for periodic training.

It is understood that the property has a reticulated mains water supply and no groundwater is used at the
site. The site is not located near a source of gas or vapour emissions to air, noting that the property was
located outside of the chlorine buffer zone for the Water Corporation’s water treatment plant.

Based on the infrastructure present and use of the property, there are a number of plausible pathways,
should a contaminant source be present. Table 4 presents the preliminary pathway assessment based on
the assumption that an environmental contaminant source is present.
Table 4: Preliminary Exposure Pathway Assessment
Identified Exposure Pathways
Inhalation of vapours or gases from contaminated groundwater
Inhalation of vapours or gases from contaminated surface water
Inhalation of contaminated dusts
Inhalation of gases or vapours incidentally introduced into the building by personnel*
Ingestion of contaminated water
Ingestion of contaminated food from the garden from soil contamination
Absorption from contact with contaminated soil (garden)
*This indirect pathway related to off-site attendance at an incident by DFES personnel has been included due to the description of the
post incident decontamination processes described by the firefighters and potential for introduction of contaminants into these areas on
their clothing.

The approach to investigating if a contaminant source is present at the site is outlined in Section 5.0.
A discussion on the nearby water treatment plant is provided in Section 6.7.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 15
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

5.0 SITE SAMPLING


5.1 Chemicals of Interest
In order to provide an assessment of the building some judgemental sampling was undertaken. In order for
the sampling to be relevant a list of COI from substances identified by regulatory authorities as being
associated with the development of kidney (renal) cancer was developed (Table 5). The list of COI was also
provided to a DFES occupational physician for review and comment. The International Agency for Research
on Cancer (IARC) Classification for each COI is also provided in Table 5 and the description for those
classifications is provided in Table 6.
Table 5: Chemicals of Interest
IARC
Chemical Source
Classification
Trichloroethylene (TCE) (ATSDR, 2013; US EPA, 2011) Group 1
Tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene-(PCE)) (ATSDR, 1997) Group 2A
Not currently
Perflourooctanoic acid (PFOA) (US EPA, 2005)
classified
Potassium bromate (US EPA, 2001) Group 2B
Cadmium (ATSDR, 2012a; US EPA 1992) Group 1
Arsenic (US EPA, 1998) Group 1
Trihalomethanes – bromoform and
(ATSDR, 2005) Group 3
dibromochloromethane
Phosphate ester flame retardants (PEFR) e.g. tributyl
phosphate, tri-isobutyl phosphate, tris(2-butoxyethyl) Not currently
(ATSDR, 2012b).
phosphate, tri-phenyl phosphate, tri-cresyl phosphate, classified.
tri-(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate

Table 6: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Classification


Sufficient evidence in humans or sufficient evidence in animals and strong mechanistic data
Group 1
in humans
Group 2A Limited evidence in humans and sufficient evidence in animals
Group 2B Limited evidence in humans and less than sufficient evidence in animals
Group 3 Inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in animals
Group 4 Lack of carcinogenicity in humans and in animals

Through the consultation process, station personnel requested that the investigation also consider the
following compounds:

 Chlorine

 Iron sulphide

 Glyphosate

 2, 4-D

 Asbestos

 Benzidines and aromatic amines (e.g.1,2-diphenylhydrazine,


4,4'-methylenebis(2-chloroaniline)(MBOCA), 4,4'-methylenedianiline, atrazine, benzidine, pyridine).

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 16
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

Chlorine and iron sulphide were considered in the investigation. These two chemicals have not been
identified by regulatory authorities as being associated with the development of kidney cancer (NHMRC,
2011).

Glyphosate, 2, 4-D (which were common agricultural chemicals) and asbestos were amongst the COI
considered in the development of the screening sampling. Review of the management of these chemicals in
Australia (enHealth, 2005; NHMRC, 2011) confirmed that these are not currently substances recognised as
being either carcinogens (glyphosate and 2, 4-D) or associated with the development of kidney cancer
2
(asbestos ). Benzidines and aromatic amines (1,2-diphenylhydrazine, 4,4'-methylenebis(2-
chloroaniline)(MBOCA), 4,4'-methylenedianiline, atrazine, benzidine, pyridine) were also considered but, with
the exception of benzidine, they were not identified as being associated with the development of kidney
cancer. Benzidine is associated with the dye industry and not considered likely to be present on site given
the history and current use.

5.2 Sampling Methodology


The intent of the sampling was to assess whether or not the COI listed above were present in environmental
media at the site and, if they were present, to compare the measured concentrations of the COI with
published environmental guideline values, where available. For COI detected at concentrations exceeding
relevant environmental guidelines or those that do not have an established environmental guideline, further
testing and/or development of an exposure assessment would be progressed. Golder attended the site on
5 November 2014 to collect the samples. The following quality assurance procedures were adhered to:

 Dedicated equipment was used at each sampling location (disposable gloves and hand auger) coupled
with stringent field decontamination procedures to minimise the risk of cross contamination (where
applicable).

 Samples were collected in laboratory-provided sample containers with the appropriate preservatives
where required.

 The swab samples were collected using GhostWipes. Swab wipes were 15 cm × 15 cm wipes
pre-moistened with deionised water and packaged in individually sealed packets. Swabbed areas
2 2
ranged from 100 cm to 400 cm . The swabs were placed in laboratory supplied polyethylene
centrifuge tubes for transport to the analytical laboratory.

 Samples were labelled and stored on ice for transport to a laboratory for analyses.

 Chain of custody (COC) documentation is provided in Appendix C, Calibration certificates of equipment


used are included in Appendix D. Appendix E shows laboratory results and laboratory certificates.

 Samples were transported under COC to NMI in Perth, a National Association of Testing Authorities
(NATA) accredited laboratory, for analyses.

The following sections provide sampling rationale for each medium.

5.2.1 Air Quality Sampling


As a number of the COI are volatile organic compounds (VOC), a photo-ionisation detector (PID) was used
to take measurements throughout the building to assess whether VOC were present. The sampling with the
PID was used as a screening assessment, i.e. if VOC were detected in the PID sampling, a detailed
sampling programme would be undertaken to quantify the concentrations in air.

2 Quoted from enHealth 2005: “Evidence does not exist for non-cancer effects outside the respiratory system, other than some suggestion of immunotoxic effects (ATSDR, 2001).
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 1987) and the World Health Organization (WHO, 1986) concluded that the information for development of other health
effects, such as gastrointestinal cancer from inhalation or ingestion of fibres, is inconsistent and inconclusive. More recently the United States Department of Health and Human
Services (DHHS) declared ‘an increased risk of gastrointestinal cancer to be an effect of concern’ (ATSDR, 2001).

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 17
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

The vacuum cleaners were also screened with a PID although it was unlikely that VOC would be retained in
the vacuum cleaners because of the volatile nature of the compounds, that is, the compounds being targeted
in the screening sampling dissipate quickly on release to the atmosphere. This means that current
measurements do not necessarily reflect concentrations in the past unless there were to be an ongoing
source and release of VOC in or around the site.

5.2.2 Groundwater Sampling


Two bore-like structures were identified in the site walk over. These appeared to belong to the Water
Corporation, and were subsequently identified by Water Corporation personnel as cathodic protection posts
and could not be sampled. We therefore undertook sampling of groundwater from two irrigation wells that
were located in the recreation reserve surrounding the site. One sample was collected from each well.
The bore construction details could not be verified by Golder as part of this investigation.

Sampling of groundwater was undertaken to assess whether or not VOC, i.e. TCE, PCE and brominated
solvents specifically, were detectable in groundwater and could be a source of exposure to firefighters at the
site. VOC were the main COI targeted for groundwater as the site does not use bore water and therefore
direct contact with groundwater at the site is improbable.

Analytes for the groundwater samples were a metals suite (including cadmium and arsenic), VOC (including
brominated solvents), potassium bromate and phosphate (to assess the presence of potassium ester flame
retardants).

Golder attended the site on 5 November 2014 to collect the samples. The water was under high pressure.

Groundwater samples submitted to the laboratory were analysed for the following:

 Trihalomethanes

 Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

 Halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons

 Poly aromatic hydrocarbons

 Inorganics (bromate, phosphate, potassium)

 Metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium (total), copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, sulfur and zinc)

 Physico-chemical properties (pH).


Note: the metals listed above are part of a standard analytical suite that includes the COI arsenic and
cadmium. The presence of other metals listed at concentrations higher than background or environmental
reference values may indicate a contaminant source or sources that warrant further investigation.

5.2.3 Surface Water Sampling


Surface water sampling of the drain was undertaken to inform if there is surface soil contamination in and
around the site. This contamination can collect in drains with rain and surface water run-off if there are
upgradient sources of contamination. Surface water samples were taken directly from the surface water of
the drain, where access was available. The bottles were positioned so the opening was below the surface
but not in contact with the bottom of the drain.

The surface water samples were submitted to the laboratory and analysed for the same COI as listed in
Section 5.2.2 above.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 18
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

5.2.4 Tap Water Sampling


Tap water sampling was conducted to assess if there were characteristics (metals, pH or chlorine content) at
concentrations that exceeded the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG; NHMRC, 2011). Tap water
was collected from the cold water line from the tap located in the kitchen of the fire station and was filled
directly (no period of running the tap first) into dedicated laboratory jars.

The tap water sample was submitted to the laboratory and was analysed for the following:

 Metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium (total), copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, sulfur and zinc)

 Chlorine

 pH.

5.2.5 Swab and Soil Sampling


5.2.5.1 Swab
There are no Australian Standards (AS) or guidelines specifically for the collection of surface swab samples.
AS 4874-2000 (Guide to the investigation of potentially contaminated soil and deposited dust as a source of
lead available to humans) includes some guidance on “wipe sampling” surfaces for measuring lead
concentrations. The US Occupational Safety and Health Association (OSHA) use a swab sample method
(ID-125-G). Accepted methods for the collection of samples were followed and the swab sampling was
targeted at internal and external non-porous surfaces that were less likely to have been fully cleaned or
disturbed during the life of the facility. Thus increasing likelihood of detection should a compound be
present. Swab sampling focused on metals.
2 2
The areas swabbed ranged from 100 cm to 400 cm due to the different surfaces designs such as window
frames and vacuum cleaners. Samples were taken from the two vacuum cleaners stored in the outbuilding
that had been used on the site since it had opened, with the rationale that if metals were present in the dust
within the building they could be detected in the residual dust in the vacuum cleaners.

The areas were swabbed with the same swab two to three times in different directions and the area used to
collect the sample recorded. Swab samples submitted to the laboratory were analysed for the following:

 Metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium (total), copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, sulfur and zinc), and

 Phosphate.

5.2.5.2 Soil
Soil samples were targeted to areas that are routinely accessed by the firefighters on site. The PSI site
walkover and interviews indicated minimal interaction with soil at the site. It is understood by Golder
(pers. comm. Ben Darcy via telephone 4 November 2014) that there was a vegetable patch on site. Due to
the likely handling of soil and potential for uptake into vegetables this was the focus of the soil sampling. Soil
samples were collected at two locations (fruit tree and vegetable patch), with a surface and approximately
20 cm deep sample collected at each location. An additional surface soil sample was taken on the perimeter
fence area due to anecdotal reports of sludge disposal in this area. The soils were analysed for metals and
total phosphate (total phosphate was used as an indicator for PEFR).

Soil samples submitted to the laboratory were analysed for one or more of the following:

 Metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium (total), copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, sulfur and zinc

 Total phosphate.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 19
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

6.0 RESULTS
6.1 Interpretation of Laboratory Results
As described previously, the samples collected during this investigation were sent to a NATA accredited
laboratory for analysis. The laboratory provides the analytical result together with the limit of reporting
(LOR). The detection of a compound or substance does not automatically mean there is a risk.
To understand the results they need to be assessed against known or established values or trigger levels (if
available and applicable) or in some cases considered via an exposure calculation or study.

The following sections provide the results and interpretation for the sampling undertaken.

6.2 Air Quality


The building was surveyed using a PID and measurements taken in each room as shown in Appendix A,
Figure F00P. The survey did not detect the presence of VOC within the building. PID samples taken on the
premises at the following locations recorded zero concentration of VOC:

 Dormitory 1, 2, 3 and 4 (head of each bed).

 Bathroom for Dormitory 2, 3 and 4 (centre drain and shower drain).

 Exercise room/gym – corner areas

 Training room – corner areas

 Study – corner areas.


6.3 Groundwater
The results of the groundwater sampling are presented in Appendix E1, Table A1 and Table A2. The
sampling locations are represented in Appendix A, Figure F00Q.

No VOCs were identified in the groundwater and no COIs were identified in the groundwater. The majority of
the analytes were below the laboratory LOR and the pH of the groundwater was within normal ranges.

Total phosphate has been used as surrogate for PEFR due to lack of availability in Australia to test for the
particular compounds. Phosphate has been detected which is normal for surface and groundwater. The
Australian Freshwater and Marine Guidelines (ANZECC & ARMCANZ, 2000) have trigger values for South
West Australia for total phosphorus for surface water bodies that range (depending on water body type) from
0.010 to 0.065 mg/L (ANZECC & ARMCANZ, 2000 pg 3.3-14). These values are very conservative and
typically their application to groundwater would allow consideration of higher tolerable concentration due to
dilution when received in the surface water body (i.e. 10 times). The stormwater recorded the highest
concentration which is not surprising given the stagnant nature of the drain and the collection of runoff water.
The concentrations detected are therefore considered consistent with typical natural levels and therefore it is
not considered likely that these represent the presence of PEFR at the site.

Hexachlorobutadiene and vinyl chloride were not detected with a LOR of 0.001 mg/L; the National
Environmental Protection Measure (NEPM) groundwater investigation levels (GIL) for use as drinking water
are 0.0007 mg/L and 0.0004 mg/L respectively. Whilst there is potential for the GIL to be exceeded there is
no exposure pathway for firefighters to be exposed from groundwater at the site, accordingly further analysis
to assess if these compounds are present above guideline levels but below the analytical LOR applicable to
this test work is not warranted.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 20
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

6.4 Swab Sampling


The sampling locations are presented in Appendix A, Figure F00P. Results of the swab sampling are
2
presented in Appendix E2, Table B. The results are presented as µg/cm in Appendix E2. Table 7 provides
2
the conversion of these results to µg/m for comparison to health based screening levels derived by the
3
WTCIATFWG (2003) for the World Trade Center.
2
Table 7: COI Screening Values (µg/m )
Screening
Value Maximum Maximum Other Average
COI
(WTCIATFWG, Concentration Sample Location Sample Results Concentration
2003)
Arsenic 387 427 Outer Window 100, 72, 83 170
Cadmium 1557 11 Outer window NA 11*
*detection in one sample of seven.

Arsenic was detected in four of the seven samples relating to the outer windows and dorm room 2 and 3
windows. The concentration of arsenic in one sample marginally exceeded the reference value (10%). This
is not a significant exceedance given the conservatism in the surface exposure estimates. Nevertheless,
Golder has quantified the estimated daily exposure and compared the result with the WHO tolerable daily
intake for arsenic of 2.1 µg/kg/d.

The calculation of the daily exposure is based on a number of assumptions as follows:

 Estimated daily intake (EDI) equals the concentration of arsenic on swab adjusted for a surface area of
2
100 cm

 Daily Intake occurs through inhalation, ingestion and skin contact

 The amount arsenic on the swabs is internalised and distributed throughout the body

 Exposure occurs every day

 Exposure is continuous for 70 yr

 Body weight of fire fighters is 85 kg.

The estimated daily intake is thus calculated by the following equation


2
EDI = Cswab (µg/100 cm ) ÷ BW (kg) (1)

Where: EDI = Estimated daily intake (µg/kg/d)


2
Cswab = Concentration of arsenic on the on surface with a surface area of 100 cm

= Estimated daily intake of arsenic (µg/d)

Consequently, the EDI is given by 0.427 µg/d (total DI) ÷ 85 kg (body weight) = 0.05 µg/kg/d (rounded up),
which is 2.4% of the TDI. This confirms that arsenic concentrations in surface dust are not a cause for
concern.

3 World Trade Center Indoor Air Task Force Working Group (2003). World Trade Center Indoor Environment Assessment: Selecting Contaminants of Potential Concern and Setting
Health-Based Benchmarks. Available at: World Trade Center Indoor Environment Assessment: Selecting Contaminants of Potential Concern and Setting Health-Based Benchmarks

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 21
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

Appendix E2, Table B also provides the TDI calculations for the other metals included in the laboratory
analysis suite. These are not COI and the levels TDI calculations confirm that the concentrations in surface
dust are not a cause for concern.

6.5 Soil
The soil sampling results are presented in Appendix E3, Table C. The sampling locations are presented in
Appendix A, Figure F00Q. All results were below NEPM health investigation levels (HIL).

6.6 Surface Water Sampling


The surface water sampling results are presented in Appendix E1, Table A1 and A2. Table A1 provides the
results for the COI and Table A2 the full suite undertaken. PFOA was detected in the stormwater sample
taken from the surface drain to the north of the fire station property. Other substances that were not part of
the COI for this investigation were also detected, these compounds were perfluoroheptanoic acid,
perflurohexanoic acid and 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate.

The US EPA has derived a provisional health advisory level of 0.0004 mg/L for PFOA and the sample result
from the stormwater systems was 0.00035 mg/L. This concentration was below the health advisory by
US EPA. This and the fact that it is in stormwater, there is no complete pathway for firefighters to be
exposed.

Currently, there are limited experimental studies for the carcinogenic properties of this class of substances.
It is clear however from the animal toxicity dataset for Perflourooctane sulfonate (PFOS) that a high enough
dose of both PFOS and PFOA can result in liver, thyroid, and mammary tumours. PFOS and PFOA are not
genotoxic and the tumours observed occur at doses that are damaging to the liver and bile systems of the
experimental animals. The tolerable daily intakes that have been set for PFOS/PFOA are therefore
protective of the carcinogenic effects of PFOS/PFOA. These compounds bind to plasma and thus can be
detected using serum at low concentrations many years after exposure. Biological assessment is the most
accurate method to evaluate adverse health effects.

The source of the PFOA and other compounds detected in the stormwater drain cannot be established from
the single sample taken. The identification of where the detected compounds originated will not alter the fact
that there is not a complete exposure pathway.

6.7 Tap Water


6.7.1 Sample Result
A sample was taken from the kitchen tap and the results were below the ADWG. Further discussion on
drinking water is provided in the following sections.

6.7.2 Water Supply


A number of concerns were raised by firefighters and the United Firefighter's Union of Western Australia
(UFU of WA) relating to water quality and the proximity of the Water Corporation’s water treatment plant.
Golder understands that the concerns relate to:

 The uncertainty of chemicals used in the water treatment plant and the treatment process together with
the proximity to the fire station and potential for atmospheric contaminants impacting the site.

 Why the buffer distance at the water treatment plant was changed from 300 m to 200 m.

 The uncertainty as to the supply configuration and the fire station being the first or last property in the
supply line directly from the water treatment plant and potential impacts on the quality of the water.

 The potential for contaminants in the sediment pond materials that have been used as fire breaks on
the Water Corporation site and potential for that dust to contain contaminants and impact the site.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 22
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

 Conjecture or uncertainty as to whether the failure of the hot water recirculation pipework in the building
in 2012 could be a link to the cancer incidents.

6.7.3 Water Supply Overview


The site receives scheme water under the control of the Water Corporation, which is the same supply as that
provided to the entire suburb of Success as well as adjoining suburbs of Atwell, Hammond Park and Aubin
Grove. Based on information from the Water Corporation during a meeting on Monday 17 November 2014
and a subsequent site visit to the water treatment plant on Wednesday 19 November 2014, our
understanding is that the water from the plant is pumped to the Thompson Lake Reservoir where it is mixed
with water from other sources including the Perth Seawater Desalination Plant. The water is then distributed
via the mains water supply scheme and eventually to the site. This has been the source of water at the fire
station since 2011. From 2006-2011 the fire station was supplied with hills water from Canning, Wungong
and/or Churchmans Brook Dams controlled by Beenyup Regulating Valve. Appendix F provides further
information on the supply.

6.7.4 Jandakot Water Treatment Plant Overview


The water treatment plant is a conventional facility that provides filtration and chlorination of groundwater
sourced from the Jandakot Borefield. The treatment plant uses a number of products to clarify the water,
control pH and disinfect.

Aluminium sulfate is used as a coagulant to assist in the water clarifying process and polyelectrolyte is used
as a flocculant. These products are added to the clarifier stage to aggregate suspended particulates in the
water and facilitate their removal by physical means with the materials transferred to the evaporation ponds.
Neither product is known to cause cancer.

From the clarifier the water is filtered and then fluoride, chlorine and caustic soda are added in line to control
pH and provide disinfection. Water quality parameters are checked and treated water contained in a sealed
storage tank and then pumped to the Lake Thompson Reservoir.

The chlorine dosing system is contained within a dedicated control building, is process controlled and
automated shutoff devices are in place. The other chemicals are contained within dedicated tanks within
concrete secondary containment.

There was a 300 m buffer zone around the clarifier for odour, the odour related to hydrogen sulfide, a
naturally occurring compound in the groundwater. Hydrogen sulfide gas has a distinct pungent odour that
was released to the atmosphere through the aeration treatment process. The treatment process was
upgraded in 2004 and this aspect of treatment ceased, the buffer was therefore reduced to 200 m. The
200 m buffer relates to the chlorine dosing facility and is a requirement of the Environmental Protection
Authority and Department of Mines and Petroleum to safeguard neighbouring properties from the impact of
chlorine release events.

Copies of the Safety Data Sheets for the products used in the water treatment plant process are supplied in
Appendix G.

6.7.5 Water Treatment Sediment


The water treatment process does produce sediment that is sent to one of three evaporation ponds (drying
beds). This material was used by the Jandakot Airport to spread on their internal fire breaks during the
period 2000-2004 under agreement between the Water Corporation and Jandakot Airport Holding Pty Ltd.

Between 2004 and 2008 the sediment was used once a year to line the internal firebreaks at the water
treatment plant. During 2009 sediment was not removed and in 2010 to 2013 sediment was removed and
delivered to a class 1 landfill. The use of this material is yet to be decided for 2014.

Sediment sampling conducted for the period 2004 to 2008 (corresponding to use of the material on fire
breaks within the vicinity of the fire station) included the COI of cadmium. Levels were below NEPM HIL A.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 23
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

6.7.6 Water Supply Safety


The Water Corporation is responsible for the operation of the State's drinking water supplies and for the
safety of the water provided to customers. Compliance is reported to the DoH which is the regulator of
drinking water quality in Western Australia. The Water Corporation has developed Water Safety Plans for
each component of the water supply system based on identified Critical Control Points and Process Control
Points to monitor and control water quality throughout the supply system until it enters the customer’s
property. The control system has a combination of inline continuous and periodic monitoring to evaluate and
maintain water quality.

The water quality monitoring regime includes assessment of water treatment by-products for the type of
disinfection system used. The by-product sampling regime includes regular sampling of total
trihalomethanes (THM) for the requested period (sampled monthly) and periodic sampling of haloacetic acids
(HAA). The Water Corporation has monitored these parameters along with microbiological, chemical,
radiological and fluoride to determine performance in meeting drinking water quality criteria.

The Water Corporation sampling results were well below the ADWG health guideline value THM during the
period in question. Similarly the results for HAA were well below the World Health Organisation guideline
value; there is no current value for HAA provided in the ADWG.

6.7.7 Building water supply system failure


The building’s hot water recirculating copper ring main piping system failed in 2012. The cause of the failure
was not identified at the time and it is not possible to establish the cause during this investigation. Despite
this, increased levels of copper in the water system (i.e. potentially form electrolysis, leaching or erosion) are
not known to be linked to kidney cancer. Copper does not have a known association with the development
of kidney cancer and accordingly has not been included as a COI in this investigation.

The Department of Health fact sheet “Copper in Drinking Water” is provided in Appendix H and provides
further information on copper in drinking water.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 24
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

7.0 DISCUSSION
The purpose of this investigation was to identify if there was a unique situation at the site that could be a
cause for the cancer incidents. The investigation aimed to identify is there were sources of chemicals known
to cause kidney cancer at the site and assess if there was a complete pathway and hence potential for
exposure. To meet the aim of the investigation judgemental sampling was undertaken based on the
development of the conceptual site model with the intent of identifying if there was a “source” that would
have a plausible “pathway” to the firefighters (“receptors”). As described in this report, the results of the PSI
and judgemental sampling conducted at the site have not identified an exposure risk that is consistent with
the development of kidney (renal) cancer.

While PFOA was detected in the stormwater drain on the north of the site there is not a complete pathway
for firefighters to be exposed to PFOA present in the stormwater. Further, the level detected within the
stormwater is below the guideline values to be protective of health in drinking water. The source of the
PFOA detected in the stormwater drain cannot be established from the single sample taken. The
identification of where the detected compound originated will not alter the fact that there is not a complete
exposure pathway and therefore does not present a risk to firefighter health.

In relation to groundwater, no COI or VOCs were detected in the sampling. The groundwater wells were
located upgradient of the site and results of sample analyses indicate there is not an ongoing source of
groundwater contamination. There is also no complete pathway from groundwater.

The screening for VOCs was conducted throughout the building on the day that other samples were taken
and VOCs were not identified as being present. The results are considered representative of site conditions
due to the absence of VOCs in other media such as ground water.

Whilst the COI arsenic was identified in the soil samples, it was well below published health investigation
levels and the interaction with soil at the site is limited to infrequent maintenance of a vegetable garden and
general garden maintenance. Accordingly there is no cause for concern from this source.

Swab sampling detected COI arsenic and cadmium on surfaces at the station. The results for arsenic and
cadmium were compared to screening values developed for the World Trade Center and to WHO toxicity
reference values in the form of a TDI. The level of cadmium detected was below screening levels. Arsenic
was detected in four of the seven samples relating to the outer windows and dorm room 2 and 3 windows.
The concentration of arsenic in one sample marginally exceeded the reference value (10%). An exposure
calculation was completed to compare to WHO TDI levels and the level is equivalent to 2.4% of the TDI.
Accordingly the levels are not a cause for concern for the fire fighters health.

A number of concerns were raised by firefighters and the UFU of WA relating to water quality and the
proximity of the Water Corporation’s water treatment plant. The fire station is located outside of the initial
odour buffer zone of 300 m and the current buffer zone of 200 m and the products used at the Water
Corporation’s facility and the sediment materials do not have a link with the development of kidney cancer.

The Water Corporation has a comprehensive testing regimen that addresses microbiological, chemical
(including fluoride) and radiological testing to monitor performance in meeting drinking water quality criteria.
The regimen includes assessment of water treatment by-products the concentration of which were well
below the ADWG health guideline value e.g. trihalomethane (THM), during the period in question. Similarly
the results for haloacetic acids (HAA) were well below WHO guideline, values (note: there is no current value
for HAA provided in the ADWG). Accordingly, the scheme supply of water to site and activities at the water
treatment plant are not considered a source.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 25
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

Sources Areas of Interest Exposure Pathways Receptor

Inhalation
Groundwater beneath
the site
Groundwater Direct Contact

Groundwater Inhalation
upgradient of the site
and at the site Direct Contact

On-site soil Surface soil near boot Inhalation


washing area and
On-site dust/surface garden. Surface dusts. Direct Contact

Success Fire Fighters


Inhalation
Off-site soil Surface dusts
Direct Contact

Inhalation
Off-site surface water Stormwater drain
Direct Contact

Ingestion
Drinking water Tap water at the site
Direct Contact

Incomplete exposure pathway No COI Detected No kidney cancer link identified

Complete exposure pathway COI Detected Kidney cancer link identified

Figure 2: Investigation Outcome Conceptual Model

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 26
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

8.0 CONCLUSION
The scope of the investigation was to assess whether there was an identifiable link between the environment
at site and the incidents of kidney cancer. The COI included chemicals known to cause renal cancer based
on animal studies and epidemiological studies in humans. The majority of the COI identified as plausible
causative agents of kidney cancer in the firefighters, in various environmental media at or near the site, were
not detected. The COIs cadmium, arsenic and PFOA were detected and the concentrations were sufficiently
low as to not be a concern for health of the firefighters. There was not a complete pathway for exposure of
firefighters to PFOA present in the stormwater drain. Accordingly, there is no identified link between the site
and the incidents of kidney cancer experienced.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 27
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

9.0 LIMITATIONS
Your attention is drawn to the document “Limitations”, which is included as Appendix I to this report. This
document is intended to assist you in ensuring that your expectations of this report are realistic, and that you
understand the inherent limitations of a report of this nature. If you are uncertain as to whether this report is
appropriate for any particular purpose please discuss this issue with us.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 28
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

REFERENCES
Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand and the Australian and New
Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ARMCANZ & ANZECC), 2000, Australian and New
Zealand Guidelines for fresh and marine water quality: Volume 1.

ATSDR, 1997. Toxic Substances Portal - Tetrachloroethylene (PERC). Available at:


http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=265&tid=48 Accessed 21 October 2014.

ATSDR, 2005. Toxic Substances Portal - Bromoform & Dibromochloromethane. Available at:
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=713&tid=128 Accessed 21 October 2014.

ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), 2011. Toxic Substances Portal: Renal
(Urinary System or Kidneys). Available at:
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/substances/toxorganlisting.asp?sysid=20. Accessed 21 October 2014.

ATSDR, 2012a. Toxic Substances Portal : Cadmium. Available at:


http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=48&tid=15 Accessed 21 October 2014.

ATSDR, 2012b: Toxic Substances Portal : Toxicological Profile for Phosphate Ester Flame Retardants.
Available at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=1119&tid=239. Accessed 4 November 2014 Last
updated March 2011. Accessed 21 October 2014.

ATSDR, 2013. Toxic Substances Portal - Trichloroethylene (TCE). Available at:


http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=173&tid=30. Accessed 21 October 2014.

City of Cockburn. (2014). Town Planning Scheme 3. Accessed October 2014 at


http://online.planning.wa.gov.au/lps/localplanningschemes.asp?f=Cockburn – City of (Scheme 3)

Department of Environment Regulation, Contaminated Sites Database. Accessed October 2014 at:
https://secure.dec.wa.gov.au/idelve/css/

Enhealth (2012) Australian Exposure Factor Guide. Accessed 2 December 2014 at


http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/A12B57E41EC9F326CA257BF0001F9E7D/$F
ile/doha-aefg-120910.pdf

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australian Drinking Water Guidelines 6, 2011
(Version 3.0 Updated December 2014), Commonwealth of Australia. [Accessed 23 December 2014].

International Agency for Research on Cancer. Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to
Humans, Chlorinated Drinking-water; Chlorination By-products; Some Other Halogenated Compounds;
Cobalt and Cobalt Compounds. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; Vol.
52. 1991, Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Basic Information about Disinfection Byproducts in
Drinking Water: Total Trihalomethanes, Haloacetic Acids, Bromate and Chlorite. 13 December 2013;
Accessed 25 November 2014.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Provisional Health Advisories for Perfluorooctanoic
Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), 8 January 2009. Accessed 15 December 2014.

US EPA, 1992. Integrated Risk Information System: Cadmium (CASRN 7440-43-9). Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0141.htm. Accessed 21 October 2014.

US EPA, 1998. Integrated Risk Information System: Arsenic, inorganic (CASRN 7440-38-2). Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0278.htm. Accessed 4 November 2014.

US EPA, 2001. Integrated Risk Information System: Bromate (CASRN 15541-45-4). Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/1002.htm. Accessed 21 October 2014.

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 29
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

US EPA, 2005. Draft risk assessment of the potential human health effects associated with exposure to
Perfluorooctanoic acid and its salts. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/pfoa/pubs/pfoarisk.pdf.
Accessed 4 November 2014.

US EPA, 2011. Integrated Risk Information System: Trichloroethylene (CASRN 79-01-6). Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0199.htm. Accessed 21 October 2014.

US EPA, 2012. Integrated Risk Information System: Tetrachloroethylene (CASRN: 127-18-4). Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0106.htm. Accessed 21 October 2014.

WHO (various dates) – Evaluations of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Accessed
1 December 2014 at http://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminants-jecfa-database/search.aspx

World Trade Center Indoor Air Task Force Working Group (2003). World Trade Center Indoor Environment
Assessment: Selecting Contaminants of Potential Concern and Setting Health-Based Benchmarks.
Available at: World Trade Center Indoor Environment Assessment: Selecting Contaminants of Potential
Concern and Setting Health-Based Benchmarks

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 30
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

Report Signature Page

GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD

Mike Woods Sarah McKiernan


EHS Consultant Principal Toxicologist

MW/SAM/PDM/eh

A.B.N. 64 006 107 857

Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation.

j:\env\2014 - contam sites\1413531-dfes site investigation success\correspondence out\001-r - dfes psi\1413531-001-r-rev1.docx

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 31
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX A
Figures

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
390000 391000 392000 393000

KEY MAP
WANNEROO

MIDLAND
6444000

6444000
PERTH

FREMANTLE

APPROXIMATE
VIEW EXTENT
ARMADALE

BYFORD
KWINANA

ROCKINGHAM

0 5 10 JARRAHDALE
SERPENTINE
Kilometres
6443000

6443000
!
(
6442000

6442000
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A4
6441000

6441000
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00A-Rev1.mxd

NOTES
1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE


DRAFT IMAGE SOURCED FROM METRO STREETSMART 2009.
INSET BASE DATA/ROADS SOURCED FROM STREET PRO DATA 2009.

390000 391000 392000 393000

LEGEND

(
! SITE LOCATION
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 m

1:20,000

CLIENT PROJECT
DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SUCCESS FIRE STATION
25mm

CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE

PREPARED
LOCATION PLAN
MS
DESIGN

REVIEW CWC CONTROL Rev. FIGURE


PROJECT
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00A
0
391000 391200 391400 391600

ANTINA WAY
CORREA PAS
6442600

6442600
S
TURN
WARRU GDNS DAVIESIA

WAY
MAL A

PITTA CNR E: 391232.148 E: 391292.126


N: 6442467.410 N: 6442468.204
!1 !2

HAMMOND RD
SUTTOR DR

KUNDIP LANE

E: 391232.914 E: 391292.972
N: 6442409.493 !
5 N: 6442404.289
DARWINIA RD

!4 !3
6442400

6442400
E: 391238.991
FRANKENIA TURN N: 6442403.577
BREMER WAY

VELVET LANE
MA NBY BEND

IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00B-Rev1.mxd

R
NO
WILLE R IN
LO

STARBUSH GDNS
OP

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAFT

391000 391200 391400 391600

LEGEND REFERENCE NOTES


CLIENT PROJECT
AERIAL IMAGERY © NEARMAP 2014.09.04 1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50
SITE BOUNDARY DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
CADASTRE BOUNDARY AND ROADS © WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
CADASTRE BOUNDARY LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS LANDGATE (2014)

CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE

PREPARED MS SITE PLAN


0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC


PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev. FIGURE
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00B

0
391000 391500 392000 392500 393000 393500

6443000

6443000
6442500

6442500
APPROXIMATE
SITE BOUNDARY
6442000

6442000

IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00C-Rev1.mxd

6441500

6441500
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAFT

391000 391500 392000 392500 393000 393500

REFERENCE NOTES
CLIENT PROJECT
SITE LAYOUT PROVIDED BY CLIENT. 1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50
DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
PREPARED JRP CITY OF COCKBURN
0 100 200 300 400 500 m DESIGN
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME NO. 3 (DISTRICT SCHEME)

1:10,000 REVIEW CWC


PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev. FIGURE
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00C

0
386000 388000 390000 392000 394000 396000

SOUTH
LAKE

Stock Rd
No
rt h
La
ke
Rd
6446000

6446000
JANDAKOT
YANGEBUP
No
rt h
La
ke
Rd
Rd

COCKBURN
k
oc
St

CENTRAL

Kw
ina
n
aF
wy
Ar
m ad
r Dr ale
Be e lia Rd

Arm
a d ale
Rd
6444000

6444000
BANJUP
ATWELL
BEELIAR

APPROXIMATE
Russell Rd
SITE BOUNDARY

wy
na F
SUCCESS

IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
a
Kwin
6442000

6442000
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00D-Rev1.mxd

Ro
cki
ng
ha m
Rd
Rock ing ha m
Rd

HENDERSON
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAFT
WATTLEUP

386000 388000 390000 392000 394000 396000

LEGEND REFERENCE NOTES


CLIENT PROJECT
CADASTRE BOUNDARY AND ROADS © WESTERN AUSTRALIAN 1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50
SITE BOUNDARY LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS LANDGATE (2014)
DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
CADASTRE BOUNDARY
CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
CONTAMINATED SITES
PREPARED JRP SITE PLAN - CONTAMINATED SITES
0 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 m DESIGN

1:30,000 REVIEW CWC


PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev. FIGURE
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00D

0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

6442600

6442600
6442500

6442500
6442400

6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00E-Rev1.mxd

6442300

6442300
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAFT
6442200

6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

LEGEND NOTES CLIENT PROJECT


1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SITE BOUNDARY
SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
REFERENCE
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS 1953 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC


PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev. FIGURE
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00E

0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

6442600

6442600
6442500

6442500
6442400

6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00F-Rev1.mxd

6442300

6442300
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
6442200

6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

LEGEND NOTES CLIENT PROJECT


1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SITE BOUNDARY
SUCCESS FIRE STATION
REFERENCE

25mm
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
1965 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC FIGURE


F00F
PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev.
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1

0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

6442600

6442600
6442500

6442500
6442400

6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00G-Rev 1.mxd

6442300

6442300
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
6442200

6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

LEGEND NOTES CLIENT PROJECT


1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SITE BOUNDARY
SUCCESS FIRE STATION
REFERENCE

25mm
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
1974 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC FIGURE


F00G
PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev.
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1

0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

6442600

6442600
6442500

6442500
6442400

6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00H-Rev1.mxd

6442300

6442300
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
6442200

6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

LEGEND NOTES CLIENT PROJECT


1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SITE BOUNDARY
SUCCESS FIRE STATION
REFERENCE

25mm
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
1979 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC FIGURE


F00H
PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev.
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1

0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

6442600

6442600
6442500

6442500
6442400

6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00I-Rev1.mx d

6442300

6442300
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAFT
6442200

6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

LEGEND NOTES CLIENT PROJECT


1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SITE BOUNDARY
SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
REFERENCE
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS 1981 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC


PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev. FIGURE
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00I

0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

6442600

6442600
6442500

6442500
6442400

6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00J-Rev1.mxd

6442300

6442300
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
6442200

6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

LEGEND NOTES CLIENT PROJECT


1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SITE BOUNDARY
SUCCESS FIRE STATION
REFERENCE

25mm
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
1985 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC FIGURE


F00J
PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev.
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1

0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

6442600

6442600
6442500

6442500
6442400

6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00K-Rev1.mxd

6442300

6442300
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAFT
6442200

6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

LEGEND NOTES CLIENT PROJECT


1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SITE BOUNDARY
SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
REFERENCE
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS 1995 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC


PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev. FIGURE
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00K

0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

6442600

6442600
6442500

6442500
6442400

6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00L-Rev1.mxd

6442300

6442300
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
6442200

6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

LEGEND NOTES CLIENT PROJECT


1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SITE BOUNDARY
SUCCESS FIRE STATION
REFERENCE

25mm
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
2002 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC FIGURE


F00L
PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev.
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1

0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

6442600

6442600
6442500

6442500
6442400

6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00M-Rev1.mxd

6442300

6442300
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAFT
6442200

6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

LEGEND NOTES CLIENT PROJECT


1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SITE BOUNDARY
SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
REFERENCE
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS 2006 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC


PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev. FIGURE
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00M

0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

6442600

6442600
6442500

6442500
6442400

6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00N-Rev1.mxd

6442300

6442300
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAFT
6442200

6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600

LEGEND NOTES CLIENT PROJECT


1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50 DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SITE BOUNDARY
SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
REFERENCE
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS 2010 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN

1:2,000 REVIEW CWC


PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev. FIGURE
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00N

0
390800 391000 391200 391400 391600

BARTRAM RD

20
19
6442800

6442800
21
ADMIN.
BULK CHEMICAL
STORAGE

300m CLARIFIER

WILLERIN LOOP FILTERS

DAVIESIA TURN

ANTINA WAY
m
200 GROUND WATE R FLOW
STORAGE TANK
CORREA PASS
6442600

6442600
DN S
WARRU G

HAMMOND RD
100m

GROUND WATE R FLOW

WAY EVAPORATION
MAL A
PONDS
SUTTOR DR

E: 391232.148 E: 391292.126
PITTA CNR
N: 6442467.410 N: 6442468.204
!1 !2
18

KUNDIP LANE

IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
FIR
EB
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00O-Rev 1.mxd

E: 391232.914 RE
DARWINIA RD

N: 6442409.493 ! AK
5
!3 E: 391292.972
6442400

6442400
!4 N: 6442404.289
E: 391238.991
FRANKENIA TURN N: 6442403.577
M
JACKSONIA PRO

300m
m
BREMER WAY

200
VELVET LANE

100
17

m
NORMANBY BEND
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAFT
390800 391000 391200 391400 391600

LEGEND REFERENCE NOTES


CLIENT PROJECT
AERIAL IMAGERY © NEARMAP 2014.09.04 1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50
SITE BOUNDARY DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
CADASTRE BOUNDARY AND ROADS © WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
CADASTRE BOUNDARY LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS LANDGATE (2014)

GROUNDWATER CONTOUR SOURCED FROM PERTH CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE


GROUNDWATER CONTOUR (m AHD) - MAY 2003 GROUNDWATER ATLAS.
PREPARED MS/JRP SITE PLAN - GROUND WATER CONTOURS
100m INTERVAL FROM FIRE STATION BOUNDARY 0 25 50 75 100 125 m DESIGN

1:2,500 REVIEW CWC


PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev. FIGURE
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00O

0
SWAB SAMPLES
ON WINDOWS/FRAMES

!
! ! ! ! ! !

! ! !

! ! ! ! !

! !

IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00P-Rev1.mxd

SWAB SAMPLES
VACUUMS

!
SHED

! ! ! !

LEGEND REFERENCE CLIENT PROJECT


SITE LAYOUT PROVIDED BY CLIENT (PDF FORMAT). DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
! VOC SAMPLE DETECTED DRAWING NO. A02C DATED: 11 AUG. 1999. SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
! VOC SAMPLE NON DETECT
CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE

SWAB SAMPLES PREPARED JRP PID AND SWAB SAMPLING


0 2 4 6 8 m DESIGN

1:150 REVIEW CWC


PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev. FIGURE
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1 F00P

0
391200 391250 391300 391350 391400 391450 391500 391550

6442550

6442550
6442500

6442500
STORMWATER
DRAIN

>
!

SURFACE SOIL

A
!
6442450

6442450
HAMMOND RD

IRRIGATION
BORE 2

IRRIGATION >
!
BORE 1
!A
A !
FRUIT TREE VEGETABLE PATCH
>
!
6442400

6442400
FRANKENIA TURN

IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00Q-Rev 1.mxd

6442350

6442350
VELVET LANE
NORMANBY BEND

DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

391200 391250 391300 391350 391400 391450 391500 391550

LEGEND REFERENCE NOTES


CLIENT PROJECT
AERIAL IMAGERY © NEARMAP 2014.09.04 1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50
DEPARTMENTOF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
!
> WATER SAMPLE LOCATION
CADASTRE BOUNDARY AND ROADS © WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SUCCESS FIRE STATION

25mm
LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS LANDGATE (2014)
A
! SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
SITE BOUNDARY
PREPARED MS WATER AND SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS
CADASTRE BOUNDARY 0 10 20 30 40 50 m DESIGN

1:1,000 REVIEW CWC FIGURE


F00Q
PROJECT No. CONTROL Rev.
APPROVED CWC 1413531 001 R 1

0
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over

Front Elevation_1 Front Elevation_2

Front Elevation_3 Drain Along Northern Boundary

Rear Sealed Area North East Corner Sealed Training Area and Tower

Northern Elevation. Facing West Towards Gate North Elevation Car Parking

February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 1/4
APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over

Lawn Area North Boundary and Soak Well Outdoor Cleaning Area

Appliance Room and Pump Appliance Room and Light Vehicle

Appliance Room – Entry to Tunic Room Tunic Room

Breathing Apparatus Maintenance Room Breathing Apparatus Maintenance Room

February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 2/4
APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over

Hose Room Bench Hose Room

Hose Room Chemical Storage Hose Room Chemical Storage

Watch Area Kitchen and Meals

Dry Cleaning Exchange Room Main Corridor

February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 3/4
APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over

TV/Training Room Study/Training Room

Exercise Room Dorm Room

Dorm Room Ensuite Dorm Room Ensuite

Garden Shed

j:\env\2014 - contam sites\1413531-dfes site investigation success\correspondence out\001-r - dfes psi\001 appendix b - site walk over\appendix b.docx

February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 4/4
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX C
Chain of Custody

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX D
Calibration Certificates

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
1
2
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX E
Laboratory Results
 E1a and E1b – Water Results

 E2 – Swab Results

 E3 – Soil Results

 E4 – QA and QC

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
APPENDIX E
Laboratory Results

APPENDIX E1
Water Results

February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Table E1a: COI Water Media Results 1413531-001-R-Rev1

Field_ID Q10628-01 Q10629-01 Q10629-02 Q10629-03


Location_Code Tap Stormwater Irrigation_Bore_B2 Irrigation_Bore_B1
Sampled_Date_Time 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014
Lab_Report_Number RN1045296 RN1045298 RN1045298 RN1045298
Sample_Type Normal Normal Normal Normal

Chem_Group ChemName output unit EQL Health PHA US Aust Drinking Aust Drinking Water
Canada EPA 2009 Water 2011 2011 Health
2005 Aesthetic
Sample Quality Parameters pH (Lab) pH_Units 6.5-8.5 8.1 7.1 7.3 7.1
Total Phosphate (as P) (substitute for PFER) mg/L 0.005 - 0.21 0.09 0.079
Bromate mg/L 0.01 0.02 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Heavy Metals Arsenic mg/L 0.005 0.01 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Cadmium mg/L 0.002 0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Other Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) mg/L 0.00002 0.0004
† - 0.00035 <0.00002 <0.00002
Trihalomethanes Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Tribromomethane (Bromoform) mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Volatile Organic Compounds Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene) mg/L 0.001 0.005
‡ - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene) mg/L 0.001 0.05 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

J:\Env\2014 - Contam Sites\1413531-DFES Site Investigation Success\Correspondence Out\001-R - DFES PSI\001 Appendix E - Results and Laboratory Certificates\E1 - Water Results\ Created by: JG
Table E1a Water Results Rev01.xlsm Golder Associates Checked by:
Table E1b: Water Media Results 1413531-001-R-Rev1

Field_ID Q10628-01 Q10629-01 Q10629-02 Q10629-03


Location_Code Tap Stormwater Irrigation_Bore_B2 Irrigation_Bore_B1
Sampled_Date_Time 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014
Lab_Report_Number RN1045296 RN1045298 RN1045298 RN1045298
Sample_Type Normal Normal Normal Normal

Chem_Group ChemName output unit EQL Health PHA US Aust Drinking Water Aust Drinking Water
Canada EPA 2011 Aesthetic 2011 Health

Sample Quality Parameters pH (Lab) pH_Units 6.5-8.5 8.1 7.1 7.3 7.1
Potassium (Filtered) mg/L 1 - 3 8 5
Total Phosphate (as P) mg/L 0.005
Sulphur (as S) mg/L 0.1 - 5.3 0.68 7.3
Bromate mg/L 0.01 0.02 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
N-Et-FOSA mg/L 0.00005 - <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005
N-Et-FOSE mg/L 0.0005 - <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
N-Me-FOSA mg/L 0.0005 - <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
N-Me-FOSE mg/L 0.0005 - <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
PFDcS mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
PFHxS mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) mg/L 0.00005 - <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) mg/L 0.00002 - 0.001 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) mg/L 0.00002 - 0.0019 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorooctanesulfonamide (PFOSA) mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PFTeDA) mg/L 0.0005 - <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) mg/L 0.00002 0.0002† - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorotridecanoic acid (PFTrDA) mg/L 0.00005 - <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005
Perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnA) mg/L 0.00005 - <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005
Halogenated Benzenes 1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.005 0.03 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.005 0.03 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.001 1.5 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.02 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.0003* 0.04 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
2-Chlorotoluene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
4-Chlorotoluene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Bromobenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Chlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.01 0.3 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Heavy Metals Arsenic mg/L 0.005 0.01 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Cadmium mg/L 0.002 0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Chromium mg/L 0.005 0.05 (hexavalent) <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Copper mg/L 0.005 1 2 0.19 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Iron mg/L 0.005 0.3 - 1.2 0.61 0.22
Lead mg/L 0.001 0.01 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 <0.001
Mercury mg/L 0.00005 0.001 <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005
Nickel mg/L 0.005 0.02 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Zinc mg/L 0.005 3 0.071 0.015 0.019 0.035
MAH 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Benzene mg/L 0.001 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Toluene mg/L 0.001 0.025 0.8 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Isopropylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
n-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
n-Propylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
p-Isopropyltoluene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
sec-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Styrene mg/L 0.001 0.004 0.03 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
tert-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.001 0.003 0.3 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Xylenes (m & p) mg/L 0.002 0.02 0.06 - <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Xylene (o) mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Other Chlorine mg/L 0.02 0.6 5 0.2 - - -
6:2 Fluorotelomer Sulfonate (6:2 FtS) mg/L 0.0001 - 0.0088 <0.0001 <0.0001
Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) mg/L 0.00002 0.0004† - 0.00035 <0.00002 <0.00002
PAH Naphthalene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Solvents Methyl Ethyl Ketone mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
2-Hexanone mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Methyl iso-butyl ketone mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Acetone mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Methyl-t-butyl ether mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Vinyl acetate mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Trihalomethanes Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Dichlorobromomethane mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Tribromomethane mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Trichloromethane mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Volatile Organic Compounds 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dibromoethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.001 0.003 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.001 0.03 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
trans-1,2-dichloroethene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dichloropropane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,3-Dichloropropane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
2,2-Dichloropropane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1-Dichloropropene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
trans-1,3-dichloropropene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Bromochloromethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Bromodichloromethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Bromoform ug/L 1 - <1 <1 <1
Bromomethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Carbon disulfide mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Carbon tetrachloride mg/L 0.001 0.003 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Chlorodibromomethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Chloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Chloroform mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Chloromethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Dibromomethane ug/L 1 - <1 <1 <1
Dichloromethane mg/L 0.001 0.004 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.001 0.0007 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Trichloroethene (Tricholoroethylene) mg/L 0.001 0.005
‡ - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Tetrachloroethene (Tetracholoroethylene) mg/L 0.001 0.05 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Trichlorofluoromethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Vinyl chloride mg/L 0.001 0.0003 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

J:\Env\2014 - Contam Sites\1413531-DFES Site Investigation Success\Correspondence Out\001-R - DFES PSI\001 Appendix E - Results and Laboratory Certificates\E1 - Water Results\ Created by: JG
Table E1b Water Results Rev01.xlsm Golder Associates Checked by:
Australian Government
____________________________________________
National Measurement Institute

REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 1 of 2
Report No. RN1045296
Client : GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (WA) Job No. : GOLD55_W/141106
LEVEL 2 / 1 HAVELOCK STREET Quote No. : QT-02002
WEST PERTH WA 6005 Order No. :
Date Sampled : 5-NOV-2014
Date Received : 6-NOV-2014
Attention HELEN TANNER Sampled By : CLIENT
Project Name : 1413531
Your Client Services Manager : KOON-BAY HO Phone : (08) 9368 8400

Lab Reg No. Sample Ref Sample Description


W14/019461 Q10628-01 WATER 05/11/14

Lab Reg No. W14/019461


Sample Reference Q10628-01
Units Method
Inorganics
Chlorine - Total mg/L 0.20 WL146
pH 8.1 WL120
Trace Elements
Arsenic - Total mg/L <0.005 WL272
Cadmium - Total mg/L <0.002 WL272
Chromium - Total mg/L <0.005 WL272
Copper - Total mg/L 0.19 WL272
Lead - Total mg/L <0.001 WL272
Mercury - Total mg/L <0.00005 WL41
Nickel - Total mg/L <0.005 WL272
Zinc - Total mg/L 0.071 WL272

David Lynch, Section Manager


Inorganics - WA
Accreditation No. 2474

20-NOV-2014

Unless notified to the contrary, the above samples will be disposed of one month from the reporting date.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025


_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 2 of 2
Report No. RN1045296

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.


This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
Results relate only to the sample(s) tested.

This Report supersedes reports: RN1045021

_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


Australian Government
____________________________________________
National Measurement Institute

REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 1 of 4
Report No. RN1045298
Client : GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (WA) Job No. : GOLD55_W/141106
LEVEL 2 / 1 HAVELOCK STREET Quote No. : QT-02002
WEST PERTH WA 6005 Order No. :
Date Sampled : 5-NOV-2014
Date Received : 6-NOV-2014
Attention HELEN TANNER Sampled By : CLIENT
Project Name : 1413531
Your Client Services Manager : KOON-BAY HO Phone : (08) 9368 8400

Lab Reg No. Sample Ref Sample Description


W14/019473 Q10629-01 WATER 05/11/14
W14/019474 Q10629-02 WATER 05/11/14
W14/019475 Q10629-03 WATER 05/11/14

Lab Reg No. W14/019473 W14/019474 W14/019475


Sample Reference Q10629-01 Q10629-02 Q10629-03
Units Method
Trihalomethanes
Dibromochloromethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Dichlorobromomethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Tribromomethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Trichloromethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Surrogate: DBFM %REC 100 101 102 NGCMS_1120
Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons NMI 1120 Screen
Benzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Toluene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Ethylbenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
m & p-Xylenes ug/L <2 <2 <2 NGCMS_1120
o-Xylene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Styrene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Isopropylbenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
n-Propylbenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
tert-Butylbenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
sec-Butylbenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
4-Isopropyltoluene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
n-Butylbenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Halogenated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons NMI 1120 Screen
Chloromethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Vinyl chloride ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Bromomethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Chloroethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Dichloromethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025


_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 2 of 4
Report No. RN1045298
Lab Reg No. W14/019473 W14/019474 W14/019475
Sample Reference Q10629-01 Q10629-02 Q10629-03
Units Method
Halogenated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons NMI 1120 Screen
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Bromochloromethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Trichloroethene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Dibromomethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Tetrachloroethene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,2-Dibromoethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Hexachlorobutadiene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Halogenated Aromatic Hydrocarbons NMI 1120 Screen
Chlorobenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Bromobenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Trihalomethanes NMI 1120 Screen
Chloroform ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Bromodichloromethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Dibromochloromethane ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Bromoform ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons(volatile) NMI 1120 Screen
Naphthalene ug/L <1 <1 <1 NGCMS_1120
Oxygenated Compounds NMI 1120 Screen
Acetone ug/L <10 <10 <10 NGCMS_1120
Vinylacetate ug/L <10 <10 <10 NGCMS_1120

_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 3 of 4
Report No. RN1045298
Lab Reg No. W14/019473 W14/019474 W14/019475
Sample Reference Q10629-01 Q10629-02 Q10629-03
Units Method
Oxygenated Compounds NMI 1120 Screen
2-Butanone (MEK) ug/L <10 <10 <10 NGCMS_1120
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ug/L <10 <10 <10 NGCMS_1120
2-Hexanone (MBK) ug/L <10 <10 <10 NGCMS_1120
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ug/L <10 <10 <10 NGCMS_1120
Other Compounds NMI 1120 Screen
Carbon disulfide ug/L <10 <10 <10 NGCMS_1120
Surrogate: DBFM %REC 100 101 102 NGCMS_1120
Surrogate: TOL-D8 %REC 101 101 104 NGCMS_1120
Surrogate: 4-BFB %REC 102 102 102 NGCMS_1120
Dates
Date extracted 14-NOV-2014 14-NOV-2014 14-NOV-2014
Date analysed 14-NOV-2014 14-NOV-2014 14-NOV-2014

Danny Slee, Section Manager


Organics - NSW
Accreditation No. 198

20-NOV-2014

Lab Reg No. W14/019473 W14/019474 W14/019475


Sample Reference Q10629-01 Q10629-02 Q10629-03
Units Method
Inorganics
Bromate mg/L <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 WL119
ortho-Phosphate as PO4-P mg/L 0.21 0.090 0.079 WL239
pH 7.1 7.3 7.1 WL120
Potassium - Filterable mg/L 3 8 5 WL272
Trace Elements
Arsenic - Total mg/L <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 WL272
Cadmium - Total mg/L <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 WL272
Chromium - Total mg/L <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 WL272
Copper - Total mg/L <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 WL272
Iron - Total mg/L 1.2 0.61 0.22 WL272
Lead - Total mg/L <0.001 0.001 <0.001 WL272
Mercury - Total mg/L <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005 WL41
Nickel - Total mg/L <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 WL272
Sulfur - Total mg/L 5.3 0.68 7.3 WL272
Zinc - Total mg/L 0.015 0.019 0.035 WL272

_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 4 of 4
Report No. RN1045298
Lab Reg No. W14/019473 W14/019474 W14/019475
Sample Reference Q10629-01 Q10629-02 Q10629-03
Units Method

David Lynch, Section Manager


Inorganics - WA
Accreditation No. 2474

20-NOV-2014

Unless notified to the contrary, the above samples will be disposed of one month from the reporting date.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.


This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
Results relate only to the sample(s) tested.

This Report supersedes reports: RN1045021 RN1045282

_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


APPENDIX E
Laboratory Results

APPENDIX E2
Swab Results

February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Table E2: Swab Results 1413531-001-R-Rev1

SampleCode W14/019462 W14/019463 W14/019464 W14/019465 W14/019466 W14/019467 W14/019468


[ P r o j e c t _ N a m e ] Location Outer windows Outer Dorm 3 Dorm 2 V.C. Fantouac V.C. PullmanBreathing
(carport side) windows window window apparatus room
Field_ID Q10628-02 Q10628-03 Q10628-04 Q10628-05 Q10628-06 Q10628-07 Q10628-08
Sampled_Date_Time 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014
Lab_Report_Number RN1044985 RN1044985 RN1044985 RN1044985 RN1044985 RN1044985 RN1044985
Lab_Name NMI NMI NMI NMI NMI NMI NMI
Sample_Type Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal
Matrix_Description Surface Wipe Surface Wipe Surface Wipe Surface Wipe Surface Wipe Surface Wipe Surface Wipe

ChemName output unit LOR

Total Phosphorus (as P) µg/sample 10 370 1000 260 230 55 98 370


Arsenic µg/sample 1 1.8 7.7 1.3 1.5 <1 <1 <1
Cadmium µg/sample 0.2 <0.2 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Chromium µg/sample 1 8.2 24 11 8.3 1.8 4 74
Copper µg/sample 1 17 130 27 23 9 14 29
Lead µg/sample 0.2 24 64 6.9 5.6 4.8 2.9 9.7
Mercury µg/sample 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Nickel µg/sample 1 17 32 11 13 3.3 3.8 4.9
Zinc µg/sample 1 220 400 180 170 100 120 150

ChemName output unit LOR Tolerable daily


intake/RfD
(µg/kg/day)
Total Phosphorus (as P) µg/kg/d N/A 2.42 6.54 1.70 1.50 0.65 0.29 2.42
Arsenic µg/kg/d 2* 0.01 0.05 0.008 0.010 0.01 0.003 0.007
Cadmium µg/kg/d 1** 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.001
Chromium µg/kg/d NA 0.05 0.16 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.48
Copper µg/kg/d 500*** 0.11 0.85 0.18 0.15 0.11 0.04 0.19
Lead µg/kg/d 3.5^ 0.16 0.42 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.01 0.06
Mercury µg/kg/d 0.6^^ 0.0001 0.0001 0.00007 0.00007 0.0001 0.00003 0.00007
Nickel µg/kg/d 12^^^ 0.11 0.21 0.07 0.08 0.04 0.01 0.03
Zinc µg/kg/d 300-1000*** 1.44 2.61 1.18 1.11 1.18 0.35 0.98

Calculation equals (concentration per sample / area swabbed)*10 cm x 10 cm area / body weight
The following exposure factors (Enhealth Exposure Factor Guide) were used in the calculation of potential exposure
Body mass - Male 85 kg
NA = Not Available
* Sourced from NEPC (2013) TRV of 2 μg/kg/day used in derivation of soil Health Investigation Levels.
** Calculated from WHO (2013) PTMI of 25 μg/kg bw/month. Rounded up to nearest whole number
*** Sourced from WHO (1982) PMTDI of 500 μg/kg/d for copper; PMTDI of 0.3-1 mg/kg/d for zinc
^Calculated from WHO (2011b) PTWI of 0.025 mg/kg bw. This is a withdrawn reference value but is used for comparison in the absence of a current value.
^^Calculated from WHO (2011a) PTWI of 4 μg/kg bw per week
^^^Sourced from WHO (2011c) TDI of 12 μg/kg/d

J:\Env\2014 - Contam Sites\1413531-DFES Site Investigation Success\Correspondence Out\001-R - DFES PSI\001 Appendix E - Results and Laboratory Certificates\E2 - Swab Results\ Created by: JG
Table E2 Swab results.xlsm Golder Associates Checked by: MB
Australian Government
____________________________________________
National Measurement Institute

REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 1 of 3
Report No. RN1044985
Client : GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (WA) Job No. : GOLD55_W/141106_2
LEVEL 2 / 1 HAVELOCK STREET Quote No. : QT-02002
WEST PERTH WA 6005 Order No. :
Date Sampled : 5-NOV-2014
Date Received : 6-NOV-2014
Attention HELEN TANNER Sampled By : CLIENT
Project Name : 1413531
Your Client Services Manager : KOON-BAY HO Phone : (08) 9368 8400

Lab Reg No. Sample Ref Sample Description


W14/019462 Q10628-02 SURFACE WIPES 05/11/14
W14/019463 Q10628-03 SURFACE WIPES 05/11/14
W14/019464 Q10628-04 SURFACE WIPES 05/11/14
W14/019465 Q10628-05 SURFACE WIPES 05/11/14

Lab Reg No. W14/019462 W14/019463 W14/019464 W14/019465


Sample Reference Q10628-02 Q10628-03 Q10628-04 Q10628-05
Units Method
Trace Elements
Arsenic ug/sample 1.8 7.7 1.3 1.5 WL273
Cadmium ug/sample <0.2 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 WL273
Chromium ug/sample 8.2 24 11 8.3 WL273
Copper ug/sample 17 130 27 23 WL273
Lead ug/sample 24 64 6.9 5.6 WL273
Mercury ug/sample <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 WL273
Nickel ug/sample 17 32 11 13 WL273
Phosphorus ug/sample 370 1000 260 230 WL273
Zinc ug/sample 220 400 180 170 WL273

David Lynch, Section Manager


Inorganics - WA
Accreditation No. 2474

19-NOV-2014

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025


_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 2 of 3
Report No. RN1044985
Client : GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (WA) Job No. : GOLD55_W/141106_2
LEVEL 2 / 1 HAVELOCK STREET Quote No. : QT-02002
WEST PERTH WA 6005 Order No. :
Date Sampled : 5-NOV-2014
Date Received : 6-NOV-2014
Attention HELEN TANNER Sampled By : CLIENT
Project Name : 1413531
Your Client Services Manager : KOON-BAY HO Phone : (08) 9368 8400

Lab Reg No. Sample Ref Sample Description


W14/019466 Q10628-06 SURFACE WIPES 05/11/14
W14/019467 Q10628-07 SURFACE WIPES 05/11/14
W14/019468 Q10628-08 SURFACE WIPES 05/11/14
W14/019477 Q10629-05 SURFACE WIPES 05/11/14

Lab Reg No. W14/019466 W14/019467 W14/019468 W14/019477


Sample Reference Q10628-06 Q10628-07 Q10628-08 Q10629-05
Units Method
Trace Elements
Arsenic ug/sample <1 <1 <1 <1.0 WL273
Cadmium ug/sample <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 WL273
Chromium ug/sample 1.8 4.0 74 <1.0 WL273
Copper ug/sample 9.0 14 29 1.2 WL273
Lead ug/sample 4.8 2.9 9.7 <0.2 WL273
Mercury ug/sample <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 WL273
Nickel ug/sample 3.3 3.8 4.9 <1.0 WL273
Phosphorus ug/sample 55 98 370 17 WL273
Zinc ug/sample 100 120 150 60 WL273

David Lynch, Section Manager


Inorganics - WA
Accreditation No. 2474

19-NOV-2014

Unless notified to the contrary, the above samples will be disposed of one month from the reporting date.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 3 of 3
Report No. RN1044985

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.


This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
Results relate only to the sample(s) tested.

This Report supersedes reports: RN1044978

_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


APPENDIX E
Laboratory Results

APPENDIX E3
Soil Results

February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Table E3: Soil Results 1413531-001-R-Rev1

SampleCode W14/019469 W14/019470 W14/019471 W14/019472 W14/01476


Location Fruit Tree Fruit Tree (soil Vege Patch Vege Patch Perimeter
(surface soil) depth 20-25 cm) (surface soil) (soil depth 20- Fenceline (surface
25 cm) soil)
Field_ID Q10628-09 Q10628-10 Q10628-11 Q10628-12 Q10629-04
Sampled_Date_Time 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 5/11/2014 41948
Lab_Report_Number RN1044977 RN1044977 RN1044977 RN1044977 RN1044977
Lab_Name NMI NMI NMI NMI NMI
Sample_Type Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal
Matrix_Description Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Chem_Group ChemName output unit LOR NEPM 2013 HIL- Residential


A Soil
Sample Quality Parameters orthoPhosphate mg/kg 0.5 4.9 1.2 3.9 4.8 3.8
Heavy Metals Arsenic mg/kg 0.5 100 1.3 0.6 0.7 0.6 1.4
Cadmium mg/kg 0.4 20 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4
Chromium mg/kg 0.5 100 (hexavalent) 6.4 2.1 3.5 3 3.9
Copper mg/kg 0.5 6000 39 1.7 10 8.4 3.7
Lead mg/kg 0.5 300 7.3 <0.5 2.7 1.8 3
Mercury mg/kg 0.1 40 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Nickel mg/kg 1 400 6.4 <1 1.6 1.1 <1.0
Zinc mg/kg 1 7400 110 3.9 60 26 42

J:\Env\2014 - Contam Sites\1413531-DFES Site Investigation Success\Correspondence Out\001-R - DFES PSI\001 Appendix E - Results and Laboratory Certificates\E3 - Soil Results\ Created by: JG
Table E3 Soil Results.xlsm Golder Associates Checked by: MB
Australian Government
____________________________________________
National Measurement Institute

REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 1 of 3
Report No. RN1044977
Client : GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (WA) Job No. : GOLD55_W/141106_1
LEVEL 2 / 1 HAVELOCK STREET Quote No. : QT-02002
WEST PERTH WA 6005 Order No. :
Date Sampled : 5-NOV-2014
Date Received : 6-NOV-2014
Attention HELEN TANNER Sampled By : CLIENT
Project Name : 1413531
Your Client Services Manager : KOON-BAY HO Phone : (08) 9368 8400

Lab Reg No. Sample Ref Sample Description


W14/019469 Q10628-09 SOIL 05/11/14
W14/019470 Q10628-10 SOIL 05/11/14
W14/019471 Q10628-11 SOIL 05/11/14
W14/019472 Q10628-12 SOIL 05/11/14

Lab Reg No. W14/019469 W14/019470 W14/019471 W14/019472


Sample Reference Q10628-09 Q10628-10 Q10628-11 Q10628-12
Units Method
Inorganics
orthoPhosphate(PO4-P)Leached mg/kg 4.9 1.2 3.9 4.8 WL195
Trace Elements
Arsenic mg/kg 1.3 0.6 0.7 0.6 WL273
Cadmium mg/kg <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 WL273
Chromium mg/kg 6.4 2.1 3.5 3.0 WL273
Copper mg/kg 39 1.7 10 8.4 WL273
Lead mg/kg 7.3 <0.5 2.7 1.8 WL273
Mercury mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 WL41
Nickel mg/kg 6.4 <1.0 1.6 1.1 WL273
Zinc mg/kg 110 3.9 60 26 WL273

David Lynch, Section Manager


Inorganics - WA
Accreditation No. 2474

19-NOV-2014

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025


_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 2 of 3
Report No. RN1044977
Client : GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (WA) Job No. : GOLD55_W/141106_1
LEVEL 2 / 1 HAVELOCK STREET Quote No. : QT-02002
WEST PERTH WA 6005 Order No. :
Date Sampled : 5-NOV-2014
Date Received : 6-NOV-2014
Attention HELEN TANNER Sampled By : CLIENT
Project Name : 1413531
Your Client Services Manager : KOON-BAY HO Phone : (08) 9368 8400

Lab Reg No. Sample Ref Sample Description


W14/019476 Q10629-04 SOIL 05/11/14

Lab Reg No. W14/019476


Sample Reference Q10629-04
Units Method
Inorganics
orthoPhosphate(PO4-P)Leached mg/kg 3.8 WL195
Trace Elements
Arsenic mg/kg 1.4 WL273
Cadmium mg/kg <0.4 WL273
Chromium mg/kg 3.9 WL273
Copper mg/kg 3.7 WL273
Lead mg/kg 3.0 WL273
Mercury mg/kg <0.1 WL41
Nickel mg/kg <1.0 WL273
Zinc mg/kg 42 WL273

David Lynch, Section Manager


Inorganics - WA
Accreditation No. 2474

19-NOV-2014

All results (except moisture) are expressed on a dry weight basis.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.


This report shall not be reproduced except in full.
Results relate only to the sample(s) tested.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 3 of 3
Report No. RN1044977

_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au

National Measurement Institute


APPENDIX E
Laboratory Results

APPENDIX E4
Quality Assurance _ Quality Control

February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Table E4 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Soil and Swab Results
SampleCode GOLD55W1411061
Location N/A
Field_ID Q10629-04
Sampled_Date_Time 5/11/2014
Lab_Report_Number RN1044977
Lab_Name NMI
Sample_Type Field_B
Matrix_Description Soil

Chem_Group ChemName output unit LOR


Sample Quality Parameters Total Phosphate (as P) mg/kg 0.5 3.8
Heavy Metals Arsenic mg/kg 0.5 1.4
Cadmium mg/kg 0.4 <0.4
Chromium mg/kg 0.5 3.9
Copper mg/kg 0.5 3.7
Lead mg/kg 0.5 3
Mercury mg/kg 0.1 <0.1
Nickel mg/kg 1 <1
Zinc mg/kg 1 42

SampleCode W14/019477
Location N/A
Field_ID Q10629-05
Sampled_Date_Time 5/11/2014
Lab_Report_Number RN1044985
Lab_Name NMI
Sample_Type Field_B
Matrix_Description Surface Wipe

Chem_Group ChemName output unit EQL


Sample Quality Parameters Total Phosphorus (as P) ug/sample 10 17
Heavy Metals Arsenic ug/sample 1 <1
Cadmium ug/sample 0.2 <0.2
Chromium ug/sample 1 <1
Copper ug/sample 1 1.2
Lead ug/sample 0.2 <0.2
Mercury ug/sample 0.01 <0.01
Nickel ug/sample 1 <1
Zinc ug/sample 1 60

J:\Env\2014 - Contam Sites\1413531-DFES Site Investigation Success\Correspondence Out\001-R - DFES


PSI\001 Appendix E - Results and Laboratory Certificates\E4 - QA_QC\ Created by: JG
Field Blank Results.xlsx Golder Associates Checked by: MB
Australian Government
_____________________________________________
National Measurement Institute

QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT

Golder Associates Pty Ltd (WA) Page 1 of 1


Level 2
1 Havelock Street
WEST PERTH WA 6005

Attention: Helen Tanner

NMI Job No: GOLD55_W/141106


Sample Matrix: Water
Sample LRN Range: W14/019461 - 019475

Analyte LOR Blank Units Date of Holding * Recovery Acceptability


Analysis time met % Limits

Bromate 0.010 <0.010 mg/L 6/11/2014  99% 80 - 120


Chlorine - Total 0.02 <0.02 mg/L 5/11/2014  - -
ortho-phosphate as PO4-P 0.005 <0.005 mg/L 17/11/2014  98% 90 - 110
pH - - - 7/11/2014  - -
Potassium - Filterable 1 <1 mg/L 12/11/2014  93% 85 - 110
Trace Elements
Arsenic - Total 0.005 <0.005 mg/L 13/11/2014  112% 75 - 120
Cadmium - Total 0.002 <0.002 mg/L 13/11/2014  105% 75 - 120
Chromium- Total 0.005 <0.005 mg/L 13/11/2014  103% 75 - 120
Copper- Total 0.005 <0.005 mg/L 13/11/2014  104% 75 - 120
Iron - Total 0.005 <0.005 mg/L 13/11/2014  104% 75 - 120
Lead - Total 0.001 <0.001 mg/L 13/11/2014  105% 75 - 120
Mercury - Total 0.00005 <0.00005 mg/L 13/11/2014  95% 75 - 120
Nickel - Total 0.005 <0.005 mg/L 13/11/2014  100% 75 - 120
Sulfur - Total 0.10 <0.10 mg/L 13/11/2014  85% 75 - 120
Zinc - Total 0.005 <0.005 mg/L 13/11/2014  106% 75 - 120

* Holding time from "Guidelines for the Collection and Preservation of Samples" NMI WA May 2009 and is calculated from the day the
sample was received at NMI.

Signed: David Lynch


Senior Environmental Chemist
NMI WA, Inorganic Section

Date: 20/11/2014

THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL

PO Box 1246 Bentley DC WA 6983 Tel:+61 8 9368 8400 Fax:+61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
National Measurement Institute
Australian Government
_______________________________
National Measurement Institute

QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT

Golder Associates PTY LTD (WA) Page 1 of 1


Level 2
1 Havelock Street
West Perth WA 6005

Attention: Helen Tanner

NMI Job No: GOLD55_W/141106_2


Sample Matrix: Surface Wipes
Sample LRN Range: W14/019462 - 019477

Analyte LOR Blank Units Date of Holding * Recovery Acceptability


Analysis time met % Limits

Trace Elements
Arsenic 1.0 <1.0 ug/sample 17/11/2014  100 % 75 - 120
Cadmium 0.2 <0.2 ug/sample 17/11/2014  96 % 75 - 120
Chromium 1.0 <1.0 ug/sample 17/11/2014  105 % 75 - 120
Copper 1.0 <1.0 ug/sample 17/11/2014  99 % 75 - 120
Lead 0.2 <0.2 ug/sample 17/11/2014  103 % 75 - 120
Mercury 0.01 <0.01 ug/sample 17/11/2014  90 % 75 - 120
Nickel 1.0 <1.0 ug/sample 17/11/2014  100 % 75 - 120
Phosphorous 10 <10 ug/sample 17/11/2014  109 % 75 - 120
Zinc 1.0 <1.0 ug/sample 17/11/2014  102 % 75 - 120

* Holding time from "Guidelines for the Collection and Preservation of Samples" NMI WA May 2009 and is calculated from the day
the sample was received at NMI.

Signed: David Lynch


Senior Environmental Chemist
NMI WA, Inorganic Section

Date: 19/11/2014

THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL

PO Box 1246 Bentley DC WA 6983 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
National Measurement Institute
Australian Government
_______________________________
National Measurement Institute

QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT

Golder Associates PTY LTD (WA) Page 1 of 1


Level 2
1 Havelock Street
West Perth WA 6005

Attention: Helen Tanner

NMI Job No: GOLD55_W/141106_1


Sample Matrix: Soil
Sample LRN Range: W14/019469 - 019476

Analyte LOR Blank Units Date of Holding * LRN Duplicate Recovery Acceptability
Analysis time met W14/019470 D % Limits

ortho-Phosphate (PO4-P) Leached 0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 14/11/2014  1.2 1.2 104 % 80 - 110
Trace Elements
Arsenic 0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 13/11/2014  0.6 0.6 113 % 75 - 120
Cadmium 0.4 <0.4 mg/kg 13/11/2014  <0.4 <0.4 93 % 75 - 120
Chromium 0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 13/11/2014  2.1 2.1 95 % 75 - 120
Copper 0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 13/11/2014  1.7 1.7 100 % 75 - 120
Lead 0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 13/11/2014  <0.5 <0.5 101 % 75 - 120
Mercury 0.1 <0.1 mg/kg 13/11/2014  <0.1 <0.1 83 % 75 - 120
Nickel 1.0 <1.0 mg/kg 13/11/2014  <1.0 <1.0 98 % 75 - 120
Zinc 1.0 <1.0 mg/kg 13/11/2014  3.9 3.8 98 % 75 - 120

* Holding time from "Guidelines for the Collection and Preservation of Samples" NMI WA May 2009 and is calculated from the day the sample was received at
NMI.

Signed: David Lynch


Senior Environmental Chemist
NMI WA, Inorganic Section

Date: 19/11/2014

THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL

PO Box 1246 Bentley DC WA 6983 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
National Measurement Institute
False

1.00
1
True Environmental
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Work Order Page
: ES1424466 : 1 of 3

Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE Laboratory : Environmental Division Sydney


Contact : KEVIN ROBINS Contact : Client Services
Address : ARRC Building Address : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
26 Dick Perry Avenue
E-mail : kevin.robins@measurment.gov.au E-mail : sydney@alsglobal.com
Telephone : 9368 8400 Telephone : +61-2-8784 8555
Facsimile : ---- Facsimile : +61-2-8784 8500
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only QC Level : NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
Order number : LSU141108
C-O-C number : ---- Date Samples Received : 07-NOV-2014
Sampler : ---- Issue Date : 18-NOV-2014
Site : ----
No. of samples received :3
Quote number : ---- No. of samples analysed :3

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for
release.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:
l General Comments
l Analytical Results

NATA Accredited Laboratory 825 Signatories


This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been
Accredited for compliance with carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
ISO/IEC 17025. Signatories Position Accreditation Category

Phalak Inthakesone Laboratory Manager - Organics Sydney Organics

Address 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 | PHONE +61-2-8784 8555 | Facsimile +61-2-8784 8500
Environmental Division Sydney ABN 84 009 936 029 Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
Page : 2 of 3
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.

Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.

Key : CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting
l EP231: Poor matrix spike recoveries due to sample matrix interferences.
l PFOS and PFOA results are reported as an aggregate of linear and branched isomers.
Page : 3 of 3
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) Client sample ID W14/019473_Q10629- W14/019474_Q10629- W14/019475_Q10629- ---- ----
01 02 03
Client sampling date / time 06-NOV-2014 15:00 06-NOV-2014 15:00 06-NOV-2014 15:00 ---- ----

Compound CAS Number LOR Unit ES1424466-001 ES1424466-002 ES1424466-003 ---- ----

EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds


PFOS 1763-23-1 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ---- ----
PFOA 335-67-1 0.02 µg/L 0.35 <0.02 <0.02 ---- ----
6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 27619-97-2 0.1 µg/L 8.8 <0.1 <0.1 ---- ----
FtS)
PFOSA 754-91-6 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ---- ----
N-Me-FOSA 31506-32-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----
N-Et-FOSA 4151-50-2 0.05 µg/L <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ---- ----
N-Me-FOSE 2448-09-7 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----
N-Et-FOSE 1691-99-2 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----
PFBS 375-73-5 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ---- ----
PFHxS 3871-99-6 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ---- ----
PFDcS 67906-42-7 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ---- ----
PFHxA 307-24-4 0.02 µg/L 1.90 <0.02 <0.02 ---- ----
PFHpA 375-85-9 0.02 µg/L 1.00 <0.02 <0.02 ---- ----
PFNA 375-95-1 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ---- ----
PFDcA 335-76-2 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 ---- ----
PFUnA 2058-94-8 0.05 µg/L <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ---- ----
PFDoA 307-55-1 0.05 µg/L <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ---- ----
PFTriA 72629-94-8 0.05 µg/L <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ---- ----
PFTeA 376-06-7 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ---- ----
1.00 1
True
False

Environmental
QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
Work Order : ES1424466 Page : 1 of 6

Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE Laboratory : Environmental Division Sydney


Contact : KEVIN ROBINS Contact : Client Services
Address : ARRC Building Address : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
26 Dick Perry Avenue
E-mail : kevin.robins@measurment.gov.au E-mail : sydney@alsglobal.com
Telephone : 9368 8400 Telephone : +61-2-8784 8555
Facsimile : ---- Facsimile : +61-2-8784 8500

Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only QC Level : NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
Site : ----
C-O-C number : ---- Date Samples Received : 07-NOV-2014
Sampler : ---- Issue Date : 18-NOV-2014
Order number : LSU141108
No. of samples received :3
Quote number : ---- No. of samples analysed :3

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for
release.
This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report ; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits
l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
l Matrix Spike (MS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

NATA Accredited Signatories


Laboratory 825 This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been carried out in
compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Accredited for Signatories Position Accreditation Category
compliance with
Phalak Inthakesone Laboratory Manager - Organics Sydney Organics
ISO/IEC 17025.

Address 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 | PHONE +61-2-8784 8555 | Facsimile +61-2-8784 8500
Environmental Division Sydney ABN 84 009 936 029 Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
Page : 2 of 6
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

Key : Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
RPD = Relative Percentage Difference
# = Indicates failed QC
Page : 3 of 6
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report


The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges
for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:
No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Original Result Duplicate Result RPD (%) Recovery Limits (%)
EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds (QC Lot: 3707633)
ES1424466-001 W14/019473_Q10629-01 EP231: PFOS 1763-23-1 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit
EP231: PFOA 335-67-1 0.02 µg/L 0.35 0.33 5.9 0% - 50%
EP231: 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FtS) 27619-97-2 0.1 µg/L 8.8 7.2 19.6 0% - 20%
EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds (QC Lot: 3707634)
ES1424466-001 W14/019473_Q10629-01 EP231PFC: PFOSA 754-91-6 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: PFBS 375-73-5 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: PFHxS 3871-99-6 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: PFDcS 67906-42-7 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: PFHxA 307-24-4 0.02 µg/L 1.90 2.02 6.5 0% - 20%
EP231PFC: PFHpA 375-85-9 0.02 µg/L 1.00 0.97 3.6 0% - 20%
EP231PFC: PFNA 375-95-1 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: PFDcA 335-76-2 0.02 µg/L <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: N-Et-FOSA 4151-50-2 0.05 µg/L <0.05 <0.05 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: PFUnA 2058-94-8 0.05 µg/L <0.05 <0.05 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: PFDoA 307-55-1 0.05 µg/L <0.05 <0.05 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: PFTriA 72629-94-8 0.05 µg/L <0.05 <0.05 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: N-Me-FOSA 31506-32-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: N-Me-FOSE 2448-09-7 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: N-Et-FOSE 1691-99-2 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit
EP231PFC: PFTeA 376-06-7 0.5 µg/L <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit
Page : 4 of 6
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report


The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC
parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target
analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.

Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Result Concentration LCS Low High

EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds (QCLot: 3707633)


EP231: PFOS 1763-23-1 0.02 µg/L <0.02 0.5 µg/L 116 70 136
EP231: PFOA 335-67-1 0.02 µg/L <0.02 0.5 µg/L 105 72 134
EP231: 6:2 Fluorotelomer Sulfonate (6:2 FtS) 27619-97-2 0.1 µg/L <0.1 2.5 µg/L 83.6 61 145

EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds (QCLot: 3707634)


EP231PFC: PFOSA 754-91-6 0.02 µg/L <0.02 0.5 µg/L 87.0 50 130
EP231PFC: N-Me-FOSA 31506-32-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 2.5 µg/L 93.0 50 130
EP231PFC: N-Et-FOSA 4151-50-2 0.05 µg/L <0.05 2.5 µg/L 111 50 130
EP231PFC: N-Me-FOSE 2448-09-7 1 µg/L <1.0 2.5 µg/L 104 30 130
EP231PFC: N-Et-FOSE 1691-99-2 1 µg/L <1.0 2.5 µg/L 101 30 130
EP231PFC: PFBS 375-73-5 0.02 µg/L <0.02 0.5 µg/L 84.0 50 130
EP231PFC: PFHxS 3871-99-6 0.02 µg/L <0.02 0.5 µg/L 88.4 50 130
EP231PFC: PFDcS 67906-42-7 0.05 µg/L <0.05 0.5 µg/L 95.6 50 130
EP231PFC: PFHxA 307-24-4 0.02 µg/L <0.02 0.5 µg/L 73.2 50 130
EP231PFC: PFHpA 375-85-9 0.02 µg/L <0.02 0.5 µg/L 94.6 50 130
EP231PFC: PFNA 375-95-1 0.02 µg/L <0.02 0.5 µg/L 93.0 50 130
EP231PFC: PFDcA 335-76-2 0.02 µg/L <0.02 0.5 µg/L 89.0 50 130
EP231PFC: PFUnA 2058-94-8 0.05 µg/L <0.05 0.5 µg/L 121 50 130
EP231PFC: PFDoA 307-55-1 0.05 µg/L <0.05 0.5 µg/L 73.4 50 130
EP231PFC: PFTriA 72629-94-8 0.05 µg/L <0.05 0.5 µg/L 104 30 130
EP231PFC: PFTeA 376-06-7 0.5 µg/L <0.5 2.5 µg/L 118 30 130

Matrix Spike (MS) Report


The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on
analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report

Spike SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)


Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number Concentration MS Low High

EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds (QCLot: 3707633)


ES1424466-001 W14/019473_Q10629-01 EP231: PFOS 1763-23-1 0.5 µg/L 66.6 60 136
EP231: PFOA 335-67-1 0.5 µg/L 85.0 60 134
EP231: 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FtS) 27619-97-2 2.5 µg/L 69.3 60 145
EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds (QCLot: 3707634)
ES1424466-001 W14/019473_Q10629-01 EP231PFC: PFOSA 754-91-6 0.5 µg/L 68.0 50 130
Page : 5 of 6
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report

Spike SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)


Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number Concentration MS Low High

EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds (QCLot: 3707634) - continued


ES1424466-001 W14/019473_Q10629-01 EP231PFC: N-Me-FOSA 31506-32-8 2.5 µg/L 120 50 130
EP231PFC: N-Et-FOSA 4151-50-2 2.5 µg/L 114 50 130
EP231PFC: N-Me-FOSE 2448-09-7 2.5 µg/L 93.6 30 130
EP231PFC: N-Et-FOSE 1691-99-2 2.5 µg/L 120 30 130
EP231PFC: PFBS 375-73-5 0.5 µg/L 125 50 130
EP231PFC: PFHxS 3871-99-6 0.5 µg/L 125 50 130
EP231PFC: PFDcS 67906-42-7 0.5 µg/L 33.4 30 130
EP231PFC: PFHxA 307-24-4 0.5 µg/L 86.4 50 130
EP231PFC: PFHpA 375-85-9 0.5 µg/L 121 50 130
EP231PFC: PFNA 375-95-1 0.5 µg/L 75.2 50 130
EP231PFC: PFDcA 335-76-2 0.5 µg/L 87.4 50 130
EP231PFC: PFUnA 2058-94-8 0.5 µg/L 38.2 30 130
EP231PFC: PFDoA 307-55-1 0.5 µg/L 111 50 130
EP231PFC: PFTriA 72629-94-8 0.5 µg/L 42.2 30 130
EP231PFC: PFTeA 376-06-7 2.5 µg/L # 23.7 30 130

Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Report


The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) refers to intralaboratory split samples spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of these QC parameters are to
monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.

Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) RPDs (%)


Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number Concentration MS MSD Low High Value Control Limit

EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds (QCLot: 3707633)


ES1424466-001 W14/019473_Q10629-01 EP231: PFOS 1763-23-1 0.5 µg/L 66.6 ---- 60 136 ---- ----
EP231: PFOA 335-67-1 0.5 µg/L 85.0 ---- 60 134 ---- ----
EP231: 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FtS) 27619-97-2 2.5 µg/L 69.3 ---- 60 145 ---- ----

EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds (QCLot: 3707634)


ES1424466-001 W14/019473_Q10629-01 EP231PFC: PFOSA 754-91-6 0.5 µg/L 68.0 ---- 50 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: N-Me-FOSA 31506-32-8 2.5 µg/L 120 ---- 50 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: N-Et-FOSA 4151-50-2 2.5 µg/L 114 ---- 50 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: N-Me-FOSE 2448-09-7 2.5 µg/L 93.6 ---- 30 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: N-Et-FOSE 1691-99-2 2.5 µg/L 120 ---- 30 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: PFBS 375-73-5 0.5 µg/L 125 ---- 50 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: PFHxS 3871-99-6 0.5 µg/L 125 ---- 50 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: PFDcS 67906-42-7 0.5 µg/L 33.4 ---- 30 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: PFHxA 307-24-4 0.5 µg/L 86.4 ---- 50 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: PFHpA 375-85-9 0.5 µg/L 121 ---- 50 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: PFNA 375-95-1 0.5 µg/L 75.2 ---- 50 130 ---- ----
Page : 6 of 6
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) RPDs (%)


Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number Concentration MS MSD Low High Value Control Limit

EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds (QCLot: 3707634) - continued


ES1424466-001 W14/019473_Q10629-01 EP231PFC: PFDcA 335-76-2 0.5 µg/L 87.4 ---- 50 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: PFUnA 2058-94-8 0.5 µg/L 38.2 ---- 30 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: PFDoA 307-55-1 0.5 µg/L 111 ---- 50 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: PFTriA 72629-94-8 0.5 µg/L 42.2 ---- 30 130 ---- ----
EP231PFC: PFTeA 376-06-7 2.5 µg/L # 23.7 ---- 30 130 ---- ----
True

Environmental
INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
Work Order : ES1424466 Page : 1 of 5

Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE Laboratory : Environmental Division Sydney


Contact : KEVIN ROBINS Contact : Client Services
Address : ARRC Building Address : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164
26 Dick Perry Avenue
E-mail : kevin.robins@measurment.gov.au E-mail : sydney@alsglobal.com
Telephone : 9368 8400 Telephone : +61-2-8784 8555
Facsimile : ---- Facsimile : +61-2-8784 8500

Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only QC Level : NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
Site : ----
C-O-C number : ---- Date Samples Received : 07-NOV-2014
Sampler : ---- Issue Date : 18-NOV-2014
Order number : LSU141108
No. of samples received :3
Quote number : ---- No. of samples analysed :3

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.

This Interpretive Quality Control Report contains the following information:


l Analysis Holding Time Compliance
l Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance
l Brief Method Summaries
l Summary of Outliers

Address 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 | PHONE +61-2-8784 8555 | Facsimile +61-2-8784 8500
Environmental Division Sydney ABN 84 009 936 029 Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
Page : 2 of 5
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

Analysis Holding Time Compliance


This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with recommended holding times (USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container provided. Dates
reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.

Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics
14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.

Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and
should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.
Method Sample Date Extraction / Preparation Analysis
Container / Client Sample ID(s) Date extracted Due for extraction Evaluation Date analysed Due for analysis Evaluation

EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds


Miscellaneous Plastic bottle -unpreserved (EP231)
05-MAY-2015 ---- 05-MAY-2015
W14/019473_Q10629-01, W14/019474_Q10629-02, 06-NOV-2014 --- 11-NOV-2014 ü
W14/019475_Q10629-03
EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds
Miscellaneous Plastic bottle -unpreserved (EP231PFC)
05-MAY-2015 ---- 05-MAY-2015
W14/019473_Q10629-01, W14/019474_Q10629-02, 06-NOV-2014 --- 11-NOV-2014 ü
W14/019475_Q10629-03
Page : 3 of 5
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance


The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(where) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to
the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Quality Control Sample Type Count Rate (%) Quality Control Specification
Analytical Methods Method QC Regular Actual Expected Evaluation

Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)


Perfluorinated Compounds by LCMSMS 1 3 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP231PFC 33.3 10.0 ü
PFOS and PFOA 1 3 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP231 33.3 10.0 ü
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)
Perfluorinated Compounds by LCMSMS 1 3 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP231PFC 33.3 5.0 ü
PFOS and PFOA 1 3 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP231 33.3 5.0 ü
Method Blanks (MB)
Perfluorinated Compounds by LCMSMS 1 3 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP231PFC 33.3 5.0 ü
PFOS and PFOA 1 3 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP231 33.3 5.0 ü
Matrix Spikes (MS)
Perfluorinated Compounds by LCMSMS 1 3 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP231PFC 33.3 5.0 ü
PFOS and PFOA 1 3 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP231 33.3 5.0 ü
Page : 4 of 5
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

Brief Method Summaries


The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the
Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
Analytical Methods Method Matrix Method Descriptions
PFOS and PFOA EP231 WATER In-house: Direct injection analysis of fresh and diluted saline waters. Analysis by LC-Electrospray-MS-MS,
Negative Mode using MRM.
Perfluorinated Compounds by LCMSMS EP231PFC WATER In-house: Direct injection analysis of fresh and diluted saline waters. In order to meet standard reporting limits,
saline waters may be adsorped onto a solid phase extraction medium, the salt washed out and the sample
eluted for analysis. Analysis by LC-Electrospray-MS-MS, Negative Mode using MRM.
Page : 5 of 5
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only

Summary of Outliers
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
The following report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW 846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits). This
report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only.

Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes


Matrix: WATER
Compound Group Name Laboratory Sample ID Client Sample ID Analyte CAS Number Data Limits Comment
Matrix Spike (MS) Recoveries
EP231: Perfluorinated Compounds ES1424466-001 W14/019473_Q10629-01 PFTeA 376-06-7 23.7 % 30-130% Recovery less than lower data quality
objective

l For all matrices, no Method Blank value outliers occur.


l For all matrices, no Duplicate outliers occur.
l For all matrices, no Laboratory Control outliers occur.

Regular Sample Surrogates


l For all regular sample matrices, no surrogate recovery outliers occur.

Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance


This report displays Holding Time breaches only. Only the respective Extraction / Preparation and/or Analysis component is/are displayed.

l No Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist.

Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples


The following report highlights breaches in the Frequency of Quality Control Samples.

l No Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.


WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX F
Water Corporation Information

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Success Fire Station Supply Information 2000 - 2014

Success Fire Station Water Supply Connection

The original water supply connection to the fire station located on Hammond Road in
the suburb of Success was from a 150mm diameter cast iron water main. In 2011 a
replacement 250mm diameter PVC pipe was commissioned and the 150mm cast
iron was decommissioned as a part of the construction of the Hammond Road dual
carriageway. Both the 25mm diameter domestic service and 100mm diameter fire
service were transferred over from the 150mm cast iron main to the 250mm diameter
PVC. At no stage was the Success Fires Station connected to the Jandakot
Groundwater Treatment Plant bore collector main.

Water Supply Modes

The Success Fire Station is a part of the Thomson Lake water supply locality. Given
the size and the manner in which development has occurred over the last decade, it
is best to consider this locality as two separate zones when describing how water is
supplied – Thomson East and Thomson West zones. The Success Fire Station is
located in the Thomson East zone.

Pre year 2000 to October 2006

Figure 1 provides a schematic of the Thomsons Lake locality for the abovementioned
time span. In this configuration the Thomson West zone was supplied from the
Thomsons Lake Reservoir and the Thomson East Zone was supplied from the
760mm diameter steel main that was also used to provide refill of Thomsons Lake
Reservoir. The source water for this configuration was a blend of Hills (Dam) water
typically from Canning, Wungong and/or Churchmans Brook Dams controlled via
Beenyup Road Regulating Valve and groundwater from Jandakot Groundwater
Treatment Plant (GWTP). The blend of water supplied to the Thomson East zone
was the same as the blend of water supplied to the Thomson West zone.

October 2006 to September 2011

Figure 2 provides a schematic of the Thomsons Lake locality for the abovementioned
time span. The changes in this configuration arose from the commissioning of the
Perth Seawater Desalination Plant (PSDP), dedicated rising main (pumping main)
from Jandakot GWTP to Thomsons Lake Reservoir, and the Bulk Water Transfer
Main to Serpentine Trunk Mains and Nicholson Road Pump Station. In this
configuration the Thomsons West zone was supplied a blend of desalination water
from PSDP and groundwater from Jandakot GWTP. The Thomson East zone


ceased being supplied with groundwater from Jandakot GWTP following the
commissioning of Rising Main and as such was only supplied hills water from
Canning, Wungong and/or Churchmans Brook Dams controlled via Beenyup Road
Regulating Valve.

September 2011 – present

Figure 3 provides a schematic of the Thomsons Lake locality for the abovementioned
time span. The changes in this configuration arose from the commissioning of
additional distribution mains that linked the Thomsons East and West zones. In this
(current) configuration the entire Thomsons Lake locality is supplied with a blend of
desalination water from PSDP and groundwater from Jandakot GWTP via Thomsons
Lake Reservoir.

Treatment Plant Maintenance Periods

Both Jandakot and PSDP typically have an annual two to four week maintenance
period during which time they are offline and not supplying any water. During this
time water is supplied back from Serpentine Trunk Main which can consist of hills
water and or desalination water from Southern Seawater Desalination Plant.


3
4
5
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX G
Jandakot Water Treatment Plant – Safety Data Sheets

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Aluminium Sulfate
Coogee Chemicals Chemwatch Hazard Alert Code: 3
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Safety Data Sheet according to WHS and ADG requirements Initial Date: Not Available
S.GHS.AUS.EN

SECTION 1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE / MIXTURE AND OF THE COMPANY / UNDERTAKING

Product Identifier
Product name Aluminium Sulfate
Chemical Name ALUMINIUM SULFATE
Proper shipping name Not Applicable
Chemical formula Not Applicable
Other means of
Not Available
identification
CAS number Not Applicable

Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against
Hydrated grades as Alum are high volume commercial chemicals. Sizing paper, lakes, alums, dyeing mordant, agent in fire fighting foams, cloth fireproofing,
Relevant identified uses white leather tannage, pH control in paper industry, waterproofing agent for concrete, deodorizer and decolouriser in petroleum refining, sewage precipitating
agent and for water purification.

Details of the manufacturer/importer


Registered company name Coogee Chemicals
Address Cnr of Patterson and Kwinana Beach Roads Kwinana WA Australia
Telephone +61 8 9439 8200
Fax +61 8 9439 8300
Website www.coogee.com.au
Email businessrelations@coogee.com.au

Emergency telephone number


Association / Organisation Coogee Chemicals
Emergency telephone
1800 800 655
numbers
Other emergency telephone
1800 800 655
numbers

SECTION 2 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION

Classification of the substance or mixture

HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL. NON-DANGEROUS GOODS. According to the Model WHS Regulations and the ADG Code.

CHEMWATCH HAZARD RATINGS


Min Max
Flammability 0
Toxicity 1 0 = Minimum
Body Contact 3 1 = Low
2 = Moderate
Reactivity 1 3 = High
Chronic 0 4 = Extreme

Poisons Schedule Not Applicable


[1] Skin Corrosion/Irritation Category 2, Serious Eye Damage Category 1, STOT - SE (Resp. Irr.) Category 3
GHS Classification
Legend: 1. Classified by Chemwatch; 2. Classification drawn from HSIS ; 3. Classification drawn from EC Directive 1272/2008 - Annex VI

Label elements

Continued...
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Page 2 of 6 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Aluminium Sulfate

GHS label elements

SIGNAL WORD DANGER

Hazard statement(s)
H315 Causes skin irritation
H318 Causes serious eye damage
H335 May cause respiratory irritation

Supplementary statement(s)
Not Applicable

Precautionary statement(s): Prevention


P271 Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area.
P280 Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protection.

Precautionary statement(s): Response


P305+P351+P338 IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing.
P310 Immediately call a POISON CENTER/doctor/physician/first aider

Precautionary statement(s): Storage


P405 Store locked up.
P403+P233 Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep container tightly closed.

Precautionary statement(s): Disposal


P501 Dispose of contents/container to authorised chemical landfill or if organic to high temperature incineration

SECTION 3 COMPOSITION / INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS

Substances
See section below for composition of Mixtures

Mixtures
CAS No %[weight] Name
10043-01-3 >99 aluminium sulfate

SECTION 4 FIRST AID MEASURES

Description of first aid measures

If this product comes in contact with the eyes:


Immediately hold eyelids apart and flush the eye continuously with running water.
Eye Contact Ensure complete irrigation of the eye by keeping eyelids apart and away from eye and moving the eyelids by occasionally lifting the upper and lower lids.
Continue flushing until advised to stop by the Poisons Information Centre or a doctor, or for at least 15 minutes.
Transport to hospital or doctor without delay.
Removal of contact lenses after an eye injury should only be undertaken by skilled personnel.
If skin contact occurs:
Immediately remove all contaminated clothing, including footwear.
Skin Contact
Flush skin and hair with running water (and soap if available).
Seek medical attention in event of irritation.
If dust is inhaled, remove from contaminated area.
Inhalation Encourage patient to blow nose to ensure clear passage of breathing.
If irritation or discomfort persists seek medical attention.
If swallowed do NOT induce vomiting.
If vomiting occurs, lean patient forward or place on left side (head-down position, if possible) to maintain open airway and prevent aspiration.
Observe the patient carefully.
Ingestion
Never give liquid to a person showing signs of being sleepy or with reduced awareness; i.e. becoming unconscious.
Give water to rinse out mouth, then provide liquid slowly and as much as casualty can comfortably drink.
Seek medical advice.

Indication of any immediate medical attention and special treatment needed


Treat symptomatically.

SECTION 5 FIREFIGHTING MEASURES

Continued...
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Page 3 of 6 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Aluminium Sulfate

Extinguishing media
There is no restriction on the type of extinguisher which may be used.
Use extinguishing media suitable for surrounding area.

Special hazards arising from the substrate or mixture


Fire Incompatibility May emit poisonous fumes.May emit corrosive fumes.

Advice for firefighters


Alert Fire Brigade and tell them location and nature of hazard.
Fire Fighting
Wear breathing apparatus plus protective gloves in the event of a fire.
Non combustible.
Fire/Explosion Hazard
Not considered a significant fire risk, however containers may burn.

SECTION 6 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES

Personal precautions, protective equipment and emergency procedures


Clean up all spills immediately.
Minor Spills
Avoid contact with skin and eyes.
Moderate hazard.
Major Spills
CAUTION: Advise personnel in area.

Personal Protective Equipment advice is contained in Section 8 of the MSDS.

SECTION 7 HANDLING AND STORAGE

Precautions for safe handling


Avoid all personal contact, including inhalation.
Safe handling
Wear protective clothing when risk of exposure occurs.
Store in original containers.
Other information
Keep containers securely sealed.

Conditions for safe storage, including any incompatibilities


DO NOT use aluminium, galvanised or tin-plated containers
Suitable container Polyethylene or polypropylene container
Check that containers are clearly labelled and free from leaks
In presence of moisture, the material is corrosive to aluminium, zinc and tin producing highly flammable hydrogen gas.
Storage incompatibility
Segregate from alcohol, water.

+ X + X O +

X — Must not be stored together


0 — May be stored together with specific preventions
+ — May be stored together
PACKAGE MATERIAL INCOMPATIBILITIES
Not Available

SECTION 8 EXPOSURE CONTROLS / PERSONAL PROTECTION

Control parameters

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS (OEL)


INGREDIENT DATA
Source Ingredient Material name TWA STEL Peak Notes
Australia Exposure Standards aluminium sulfate Aluminium, soluble salts (as Al) 2 mg/m3 Not Available Not Available Not Available

EMERGENCY LIMITS
Ingredient TEEL-0 TEEL-1 TEEL-2 TEEL-3
Aluminium Sulfate Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available

Ingredient Original IDLH Revised IDLH


aluminium sulfate Not Available Not Available

Exposure controls
Appropriate engineering If exposure to workplace dust is not controlled, respiratory protection is required; wear SAA approved dust respirator.
Continued...
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Page 4 of 6 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Aluminium Sulfate

controls

Personal protection

Chemical goggles
Eye and face protection
|mono-goggles.
Skin protection See Hand protection below
Hands/feet protection Wear protective gloves, e.g. PVC.
Body protection See Other protection below
Overalls.
Other protection
P.V.C.
Thermal hazards Not Available

Recommended material(s) Respiratory protection


GLOVE SELECTION INDEX Particulate. (AS/NZS 1716 & 1715, EN 143:000 & 149:001, ANSI Z88 or national equivalent)
Glove selection is based on a modified presentation of the:
"Forsberg Clothing Performance Index". Required Minimum Half-Face Full-Face Powered Air
The effect(s) of the following substance(s) are taken into account in the computer- Protection Factor Respirator Respirator Respirator
generated selection:
Aluminium Sulfate Not Available P1 - PAPR-P1
up to 10 x ES
Air-line* - -
Material CPI up to 50 x ES Air-line** P2 PAPR-P2
up to 100 x ES - P3 -
* CPI - Chemwatch Performance Index
A: Best Selection Air-line* -
B: Satisfactory; may degrade after 4 hours continuous immersion
100+ x ES - Air-line** PAPR-P3
C: Poor to Dangerous Choice for other than short term immersion
NOTE: As a series of factors will influence the actual performance of the glove, a final
* - Negative pressure demand ** - Continuous flow
selection must be based on detailed observation. -
A(All classes) = Organic vapours, B AUS or B1 = Acid gasses, B2 = Acid gas or hydrogen
* Where the glove is to be used on a short term, casual or infrequent basis, factors such as cyanide(HCN), B3 = Acid gas or hydrogen cyanide(HCN), E = Sulfur dioxide(SO2), G =
"feel" or convenience (e.g. disposability), may dictate a choice of gloves which might otherwise Agricultural chemicals, K = Ammonia(NH3), Hg = Mercury, NO = Oxides of nitrogen, MB =
be unsuitable following long-term or frequent use. A qualified practitioner should be consulted. Methyl bromide, AX = Low boiling point organic compounds(below 65 degC)

SECTION 9 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

Information on basic physical and chemical properties


Appearance White lustrous crystals, pieces, granules or powder. Acidic reaction.

Physical state Divided Solid Relative density (Water = 1) Not Available


Partition coefficient
Odour Not Available Not Available
n-octanol / water
Auto-ignition temperature
Odour threshold Not Available Not Applicable
(°C)
Decomposition
pH (as supplied) Not Applicable 770
temperature
Melting point / freezing
770 Viscosity (cSt) Not Applicable
point (°C)
Initial boiling point and
Not Available Molecular weight (g/mol) Not Applicable
boiling range (°C)
Flash point (°C) Not Available Taste Not Available
Evaporation rate Not Applicable Explosive properties Not Available
Flammability Not Available Oxidising properties Not Available
Surface Tension (dyn/cm or
Upper Explosive Limit (%) Not Applicable Not Applicable
mN/m)
Lower Explosive Limit (%) Not Applicable Volatile Component (%vol) Not Applicable
Vapour pressure (kPa) Not Applicable Gas group Not Available
Solubility in water (g/L) Reacts pH as a solution(1%) Not Available
Vapour density (Air = 1) >1 VOC g/L Not Available

SECTION 10 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY

Reactivity See section 7


Unstable in the presence of incompatible materials.
Chemical stability
Product is considered stable.
Possibility of hazardous
See section 7
reactions
Conditions to avoid See section 7

Continued...
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Page 5 of 6 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Aluminium Sulfate

Incompatible materials See section 7


Hazardous decomposition
See section 5
products

SECTION 11 TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Information on toxicological effects


Persons with impaired respiratory function, airway diseases and conditions such as emphysema or chronic bronchitis, may incur further disability if excessive
concentrations of particulate are inhaled.
If prior damage to the circulatory or nervous systems has occurred or if kidney damage has been sustained, proper screenings should be conducted on
Inhaled
individuals who may be exposed to further risk if handling and use of the material result
in excessive exposures.
|The dust may cause sore throat, coughing.
Accidental ingestion of the material may be damaging to the health of the individual.
Ingestion
Acute toxic responses to aluminium are confined to the more soluble forms.
Irritating to skin.
The material may accentuate any pre-existing dermatitis condition
Skin Contact
Open cuts, abraded or irritated skin should not be exposed to this material
Entry into the blood-stream through, for example, cuts, abrasions, puncture wounds or lesions, may produce systemic injury with harmful effects.
Eye When applied to the eye(s) of animals, the material produces severe ocular lesions which are present twenty-four hours or more after instillation.

Long term exposure to high dust concentrations may cause changes in lung function (i.e. pneumoconiosis) caused by particles less than 0.5 micron
Chronic
penetrating and remaining in the lung. A prime symptom is breathlessness.
|Repeated minor skin contact may result in numbing of fingers. Repeated minor ingestion may cause phosphate deficiency; weakening bones.

TOXICITY IRRITATION
Aluminium Sulfate
Not Available Not Available

TOXICITY IRRITATION

Intraperitoneal (Mouse) LD50: 274


Eye (rabbit): 10 mg/24h SEVERE
aluminium sulfate mg/kg
Oral (mouse) LD50: 6207 mg/kg
Not Available Not Available

Not available. Refer to individual constituents.

Asthma-like symptoms may continue for months or even years after exposure to the material ceases. This may be due to a non-allergenic condition known
ALUMINIUM SULFATE
as reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS) which can occur following exposure to high levels of highly irritating compound.
Oral (rat) TDLo: 10138 mg/kg/8D-C

Acute Toxicity Carcinogenicity


Skin Irritation/Corrosion Reproductivity
Serious Eye
STOT - Single Exposure
Damage/Irritation
Respiratory or Skin
STOT - Repeated Exposure
sensitisation
Mutagenicity Aspiration Hazard

Legend: – Data required to make classification available


– Data available but does not fill the criteria for classification
– Data Not Available to make classification

CMR STATUS
Not Applicable

SECTION 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Toxicity
DO NOT discharge into sewer or waterways.

Persistence and degradability


Ingredient Persistence: Water/Soil Persistence: Air
Not Available Not Available Not Available

Bioaccumulative potential
Ingredient Bioaccumulation
Not Available Not Available

Continued...
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Page 6 of 6 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Aluminium Sulfate

Mobility in soil
Ingredient Mobility
Not Available Not Available

SECTION 13 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS

Waste treatment methods


Product / Packaging Recycle wherever possible or consult manufacturer for recycling options.
disposal Consult State Land Waste Management Authority for disposal.

SECTION 14 TRANSPORT INFORMATION

Labels Required
Marine Pollutant NO
HAZCHEM Not Applicable

Land transport (ADG): NOT REGULATED FOR TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS

Air transport (ICAO-IATA / DGR): NOT REGULATED FOR TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS

Sea transport (IMDG-Code / GGVSee): NOT REGULATED FOR TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS

Transport in bulk according to Annex II of MARPOL 73 / 78 and the IBC code


Source Ingredient Pollution Category
IMO MARPOL 73/78 (Annex
II) - List of Noxious Liquid aluminium sulfate Y
Substances Carried in Bulk

SECTION 15 REGULATORY INFORMATION

Safety, health and environmental regulations / legislation specific for the substance or mixture
"International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) - High Production Volume List","IMO MARPOL 73/78 (Annex II) - List of Noxious Liquid Substances
Carried in Bulk","Australia - Australian Capital Territory - Environment Protection Regulation: Ambient environmental standards (Domestic water supply -
inorganic chemicals)","Australia Exposure Standards","Australia - Australian Capital Territory - Environment Protection Regulation: Ambient environmental
standards (STOCK - inorganic chemicals)","Australia Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) Substances that may be used in Listed medicines","Australia
aluminium - Australian Capital Territory - Environment Protection Regulation: Pollutants entering waterways taken to cause environmental harm (STOCK)","IMO
sulfate(10043-01-3) is found MARPOL 73/78 (Annex II) - List of Other Liquid Substances","Australia Drinking Water Guideline Values For Physical and Chemical Characteristics","OECD
on the following regulatory List of High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals","Australia Inventory of Chemical Substances (AICS)","International Numbering System for Food
lists Additives","Australia High Volume Industrial Chemical List (HVICL)","WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality - Chemicals for which guideline values have
not been established","Sigma-AldrichTransport Information","Australia - Australian Capital Territory - Environment Protection Regulation: Pollutants entering
waterways taken to cause environmental harm - Domestic water supply quality","GESAMP/EHS Composite List - GESAMP Hazard Profiles","Australia
Hazardous Substances Information System - Consolidated Lists","Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) Compendium of Food
Additive Specifications - Firming agent","Acros Transport Information","IMO IBC Code Chapter 17: Summary of minimum requirements"

SECTION 16 OTHER INFORMATION

Other information
Classification of the preparation and its individual components has drawn on official and authoritative sources as well as independent review by the Chemwatch Classification committee using
available literature references.
A list of reference resources used to assist the committee may be found at:
www.chemwatch.net/references

The (M)SDS is a Hazard Communication tool and should be used to assist in the Risk Assessment. Many factors determine whether the reported Hazards are Risks in the workplace or other
settings. Risks may be determined by reference to Exposures Scenarios. Scale of use, frequency of use and current or available engineering controls must be considered.

This document is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, review or criticism, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any
process without written permission from CHEMWATCH. TEL (+61 3) 9572 4700.

end of SDS
# 002
Product Name AIR, COMPRESSED

1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE MATERIAL AND SUPPLIER


Supplier name BOC LIMITED (AUSTRALIA)
Address 10 Julius Avenue, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, AUSTRALIA
Telephone 131 262, (02) 8874 4400
Fax 132 427 (24 hours)
Emergency 1800 653 572 (24/7) (Australia only)
Web site http://www.boc.com.au/
Synonym(s) 002 - SDS NUMBER • AIR • COMPRESSED AIR • PART# 29427NR • PRODUCT CODES: 052, 053,
054, 055
Use(s) INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS • OPERATION OF PNEUMATIC TOOLS
SDS date 17 July 2013

2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
CLASSIFIED AS HAZARDOUS (GHS) ACCORDING TO SAFE WORK AUSTRALIA CRITERIA
RISK PHRASES
None allocated
SAFETY PHRASES
None allocated

CLASSIFIED AS A DANGEROUS GOOD BY THE CRITERIA OF THE ADG CODE

UN number 1002 DG division 2.2


Packing group None Allocated Subsidiary risk(s) None Allocated
Hazchem code 2T

3. COMPOSITION/ INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS


Ingredient Identification Classification Content (v/v)
OXYGEN CAS: 7782-44-7 O;R8 20.9%
EC: 231-956-9
NITROGEN CAS: 7727-37-9 Not Available 78.1%
EC: 231-783-9
ARGON CAS: 7440-37-1 Not Available 0.9%
EC: 231-147-0

4. FIRST AID MEASURES


Eye Adverse effects not expected from this product.
Inhalation Adverse effects not expected from this product.
Skin Adverse effects not expected from this product.
Ingestion Ingestion is not considered a potential route of exposure.
Advice to doctor No special treatment required.

Page 1 of 5
SDS Date: 17 Jul 2013
Product Name AIR, COMPRESSED

5. FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES


Flammability Non flammable. Exposure to fire may cause containers to rupture/explode.
Fire and explosion Temperatures in a fire may cause cylinders to rupture. Cool cylinders or containers exposed to fire by
applying water from a protected location. Remove cool cylinders from the path of the fire. Evacuate
the area if unable to keep cylinders cool. Do not approach cylinders or containers suspected of being
hot.
Extinguishing All known extinguishants can be used. Use water fog to cool containers from a protected position.
Hazchem code 2T
2 Water Fog (or fine water spray if fog unavailable)
T Self Contained Breathing apparatus and protective gloves.

6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES


Personal precautions If the cylinder is leaking, evacuate area of personnel. Inform manufacturer/supplier of leak. Use
personal protective equipment as detailed in Section 8 of this SDS.

Environmental precautions Prevent from entering sewers, basements and workpits, or any place where its accumulation can be
dangerous.

Methods of cleaning up Carefully move material to a well ventilated remote area, then allow to discharge if safe to do so. Do
not attempt to repair leaking valve or cylinder safety devices.

References See Sections 8 and 13 for exposure controls and disposal.

7. STORAGE AND HANDLING


Storage Do not store near sources of ignition or incompatible materials. Cylinders should be stored below
45°C in a secure area, upright and restrained to prevent cylinders from falling. Cylinders should also
be stored in a dry, well ventilated area constructed of non-combustible material with firm level floor
(preferably concrete), away from areas of heavy traffic and emergency exits.
Handling Use of safe work practices are recommended to avoid inhalation. Do not drag, drop, slide or roll
cylinders. The uncontrolled release of a gas under pressure may cause physical harm. Use a
suitable hand truck for cylinder movement.

8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS / PERSONAL PROTECTION


Exposure standards
TWA STEL
Ingredient Reference
ppm mg/m³ ppm mg/m³
Argon SWA (AUS) Asphyxiant
Nitrogen SWA (AUS) Asphyxiant

Biological limits No biological limit allocated.


Engineering controls No special precautions are normally required when handling this product.

PPE
Eye / Face Wear safety glasses.
Hands Wear leather gloves.
Body Wear safety boots.
Respiratory Not required under normal conditions of use.

Page 2 of 5
SDS Date: 17 Jul 2013
Product Name AIR, COMPRESSED

9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES


Appearance COLOURLESS GAS
Odour ODOURLESS
Flammability NON FLAMMABLE
Flash point NOT RELEVANT
Boiling point -194°C
Melting point NOT RELEVANT
Evaporation rate NOT APPLICABLE
pH NOT APPLICABLE
Vapour density NOT AVAILABLE
Specific gravity NOT APPLICABLE
Solubility (water) 0.018 cm³/cm³
Vapour pressure NOT AVAILABLE
Upper explosion limit NOT RELEVANT
Lower explosion limit NOT RELEVANT
Partition coefficient NOT AVAILABLE
Autoignition temperature NOT AVAILABLE
Decomposition temperature NOT AVAILABLE
Viscosity NOT AVAILABLE
% Volatiles 100 %
Density 1 (Air = 1)
Cylinder pressure (when full) 137000 kPa to 25000 kPa @ 15°C
Critical temperature -140°C
Critical pressure 3774 kPa

10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY


Chemical stability Stable under recommended conditions of storage.
Conditions to avoid Avoid heat, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources.
Material to avoid Compatible with most commonly used materials.
Hazardous Decomposition This material will not decompose to form hazardous products.
Products
Hazardous Reactions Polymerization will not occur.

11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION


Health Hazard Non toxic gas. Non irritating.
Summary
Eye Non irritant.
Inhalation Non irritant. Adverse health effects are not anticipated under normal conditions of use.
Skin Non irritant.
Ingestion Ingestion is considered unlikely due to product form.
Toxicity data No LD50 data available for this product.

12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION


Toxicity No ecological damage is expected to be caused by this product.

Persistence and degradability Not applicable.

Bioaccumulative potential Not applicable.

Mobility in soil Not applicable.

Other adverse effects No information provided.

13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS


Cylinders should be returned to the manufacturer or supplier for disposal of contents.

Page 3 of 5
SDS Date: 17 Jul 2013
Product Name AIR, COMPRESSED

Waste disposal
Legislation Dispose of in accordance with relevant local legislation.

14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION


CLASSIFIED AS A DANGEROUS GOOD BY THE CRITERIA OF THE ADG CODE

LAND TRANSPORT SEA TRANSPORT AIR TRANSPORT


(ADG) (IMDG / IMO) (IATA / ICAO)

UN number 1002 - -
Proper shipping name AIR, COMPRESSED (contains - -
Air)

DG class/ Division 2.2 - -


Subsidiary risk(s) None Allocated - -
Packing group None Allocated - -
GTEPG 2C1
Hazchem code 2T
Other information Ensure cylinder is separated from driver and that outlet of relief device is not obstructed. Refer to
Commonwealth, State and Territory Dangerous Goods Legislation which contain requirements which
affect gas storage and transport.

15. REGULATORY INFORMATION


Poison schedule A poison schedule number has not been allocated to this product using the criteria in the Standard
for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons (SUSMP).
Inventory Listing(s) AUSTRALIA: AICS (Australian Inventory of Chemical Substances)
All components are listed on AICS, or are exempt.

16. OTHER INFORMATION


Additional information The storage of significant quantities of gas cylinders must comply with AS4332 The storage and
handling of gases in cylinders.

APPLICATION METHOD: Gas regulator of suitable pressure and flow rating fitted to cylinder or
manifold with low pressure gas distribution to equipment.

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT GUIDELINES:


The recommendation for protective equipment contained within this report is provided as a guide
only. Factors such as method of application, working environment, quantity used, product
concentration and the availability of engineering controls should be considered before final selection
of personal protective equipment is made.

HEALTH EFFECTS FROM EXPOSURE:


It should be noted that the effects from exposure to this product will depend on several factors
including: frequency and duration of use; quantity used; effectiveness of control measures; protective
equipment used and method of application. Given that it is impractical to prepare a ChemAlert report
which would encompass all possible scenarios, it is anticipated that users will assess the risks and
apply control methods where appropriate.

Page 4 of 5
SDS Date: 17 Jul 2013
Product Name AIR, COMPRESSED

Abbreviations ACGIH American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists


CAS # Chemical Abstract Service number - used to uniquely identify chemical compounds
CNS Central Nervous System
EC No. EC No - European Community Number
GHS Globally Harmonized System
IARC International Agency for Research on Cancer
LD50 Lethal Dose, 50% / Median Lethal Dose
mg/m³ Milligrams per Cubic Metre
PEL Permissible Exposure Limit
pH relates to hydrogen ion concentration using a scale of 0 (high acidic) to 14 (highly
alkaline).
ppm Parts Per Million
REACH Regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals
STOT-RE Specific target organ toxicity (repeated exposure)
STOT-SE Specific target organ toxicity (single exposure)
SUSMP Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons
TLV Threshold Limit Value
TWA/OEL Time Weighted Average or Occupational Exposure Limit

Revision history Revision Description


1.1 Standard SDS Review
1.0 Initial SDS creation

Report status This document has been compiled by RMT on behalf of the manufacturer, importer or supplier of the
product and serves as their Safety Data Sheet ('SDS').
It is based on information concerning the product which has been provided to RMT by the
manufacturer, importer or supplier or obtained from third party sources and is believed to represent
the current state of knowledge as to the appropriate safety and handling precautions for the product
at the time of issue. Further clarification regarding any aspect of the product should be obtained
directly from the manufacturer, importer or supplier.
While RMT has taken all due care to include accurate and up-to-date information in this SDS, it does
not provide any warranty as to accuracy or completeness. As far as lawfully possible, RMT accepts
no liability for any loss, injury or damage (including consequential loss) which may be suffered or
incurred by any person as a consequence of their reliance on the information contained in this SDS.

Prepared by Risk Management Technologies


5 Ventnor Ave, West Perth
Western Australia 6005
Phone: +61 8 9322 1711
Fax: +61 8 9322 1794
Email: info@rmt.com.au
Web: www.rmt.com.au.

Revision: 1.1
SDS Date: 17 July 2013

End of SDS

Page 5 of 5
SDS Date: 17 Jul 2013
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

Section 1 – Identification of the Material and Supplier


Product Name
Fluorosilicic Acid (22% Solution)
Other names
Fluosilicic acid, hydrofluorosilicic acid, silicofluoric acid. Company product 2730.
Recommended use
Fluoridation of potable water.
Company name
CSBP Limited
Address State Postcode
Kwinana Beach Road, KWINANA Western Australia 6167
Telephone number Emergency telephone number
(08) 9411 8777 (Australia), +61 8 9411 8777 (Overseas) 1800 093 333 (Australia), +61 8 9411 8444

Section 2 – Hazard Identification


Hazard Classification, including a statement of overall hazardous nature
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE.
Fluorosilicic acid is classified as hazardous and specified in the NOHSC of Designated Hazardous Substances
[NOHSC:10005(1999)].
DANGEROUS GOODS.
Fluorosilicic acid is classified for physicochemical hazards and specified as dangerous in the Australian Code for
the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Road and Rail (ADG Code), 7th Edition, (FORS, 2007).
Risk Phrases
Fluorosilicic acid is classified as corrosive.
R20/21/22 Harmful by inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed.
R34 Causes burns
R36/37/38 Irritating to eyes/respiratory system and skin.
R41 Risk of serious damage to the eyes.
R66 Repeated exposure may cause skin dryness or cracking.
Safety Phrases
Fluorosilicic acid is a hazardous substance.
S7/9 Keep container tightly closed and in a well ventilated place
S13 Keep away from food, drink and animal feeding stuffs.
S21 When using do not smoke.
S23 Do not breathe fumes, vapour or mist
S24/25 Avoid contact with skin.
S26 In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek
medical advice.
S27 Take off immediately all contaminated clothing.
S28 After contact with skin, wash immediately with plenty of water.
S29 Do not empty into drains.
S36/37/39 Wear suitable protective clothing, gloves and eye/face protection.
S38 In case of insufficient ventilation, wear suitable respiratory equipment.
S41 In case of fire and/or explosion do not breathe fumes.

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 1 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

Safety Phrases (cont..)


S45 In case of accident or if you feel unwell seek medical attention immediately (show
the label where possible).
S46/64 If swallowed, rinse mouth with water (only if the person is conscious), seek
medical advice immediately and show this label.
S50 Do not mix with hypochlorites, cyanides and strong alkalies.
S51 Use only in well-ventilated areas.
S63 In case of accident by inhalation: remove casualty to fresh air and keep at rest.
Poison Schedule
SUSDP Poison Schedule 7

Section 3 – Composition/Information on Ingredients


Chemical identity of ingredients Proportion of ingredients CAS Number for ingredients
Fluorosilicic acid 22 % (wt/wt) 16961-83-4
Hydrofluoric acid 0·5 % (wt/wt) 7664-39-3
Water Remainder

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 2 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

Section 4 – First Aid Measures


First Aid
FLUOROSILICIC ACID IS CORROSIVE ON CONTACT AND POISONOUS BY INGESTION AND
INHALATION OF ITS VAPOUR. FIRST AID ATTENTION MUST BE GIVEN AS URGENTLY AS
POSSIBLE AS OUTLINED BELOW. ALL SUSPECTED FLUOROSILICIC ACID BURNS SHOULD
RECEIVE MEDICAL ATTENTION. TRAINING ON HANDLING FLUOROSILICIC ACID
INCIDENTS USING THIS MSDS SHOULD BE PROVIDED BEFORE ANY FLUOROSILICIC ACID
HANDLING OR USE COMMENCES.
First Aid Facilities
First aid procedures, equipment, medication and training for the treatment of burns with fluorosilicic acid
should be in place BEFORE the use commences. First aid personnel should be aware of the nearest hospitals
which are familiar with the treatment of fluorosilicic acid burns.

Equipment and medication in place should be:


Safety shower and eyewash stations immediately accessible in the workplace;
Personal protective equipment for use by first aid personnel;
1 % calcium gluconate fluid (Refrigerate and check Use-by-date);
1 % gluconate gel (Refrigerate and check Use-by-date);
1 % calcium chloride solution;
1 % aluminium hydroxide solution;
Oxygen;
“Space” or thermal blankets for treating patients for shock.
FIRST AID PROCEDURES FOR DEALING WITH THIS PRODUCT AND EXPOSURE TO IT
1. Personal Protection By First Aid Personnel
First aid personnel providing first aid treatment to a patient exposed to fluorosilicic acid should observe the following
precautions for their own personal protection:
• Avoid contact with contaminated skin, clothing and equipment by wearing protective gloves;
• Wear chemical goggles as a minimum level of eye protection to prevent splashes of fluorosilicic acid entering
eyes;
• Avoid inhalation of fluorosilicic acid fumes or mist during rescue in contaminated areas by wearing suitable
respiratory protection;
• Respiratory protection suggested is: an air supplied breathing apparatus, or positive pressure self-contained
breathing apparatus.
2. Swallowed
If 250 mL, or more, of fluorosilicic acid has been swallowed and if the person is conscious, rinse mouth
thoroughly with water immediately, and give water or milk to drink. Induce vomiting. Seek medical assistance
immediately.
If unable to induce vomiting, give lime water, or 1 % calcium chloride, or milk, or 1 % aluminium hydroxide
solution before transferring to hospital.
Give oxygen via nasal catheter.
3. Eyes
Persons with potential eye exposure should not wear contact lenses. Immediately irrigate eye with copious
amounts of water, while holding eyelids open, for at least 15 minutes.
Where available, and after flushing for 15 minutes with water, flush affected eye with 1 % calcium gluconate
fluid for 2 minutes. Supply, storage and maintenance of calcium gluconate needs to be under supervision of a
registered nurse.
Seek medical assistance immediately.

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 3 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

FIRST AID PROCEDURES (cont..)


4. Skin
Wash affected area with copious amounts of water for at least 15 minutes.
Remove contaminated clothing and launder before re-use.
Apply 1 % calcium gluconate gel to affected area. If pain continues, re-apply the gel until pain ceases.
Seek medical assistance immediately.
5. Inhalation
Remove affected person from exposure to a well ventilated area. Keep warm and at rest.
Give oxygen.
If the affected person suffers cardiac arrest, commence cardio-pulmonary resuscitation immediately.
Seek medical assistance immediately.
ADVICE TO DOCTOR.
Treatment of acute skin and mucous membrane contact:
• Wash eyes, and shower instantly for 15 minutes;
• If pain exists perform topical application of 1 % calcium gluconate gel to the skin. Continual pain
requires continuing gel application;
• Flush the eyes and under the eyelids with 1 % calcium gluconate fluid for 2 minutes. Flush for a
further 15 minutes using water. Continuing pain warrants further flushing with 1 % calcium
gluconate fluid for a further 2 minutes, followed by 10 minutes of flushing with water
Treatment for ingestion:
• If 250 mL, or more, has been swallowed induce vomiting immediately;
• The use of a gastric lavage using aluminium hydroxide solution, or lime water, or 1 % calcium
chloride solution, or milk, is suggested – aluminium hydroxide solution is considered best;
• Insert an intravenous line. Monitor patient closely on ECG. Monitor plasma calcium regularly;
• 10 % calcium gluconate 500 mL given over 3 hours will be needed if there is a prolonged QT
interval in the ECG.
Treatment of acute toxic response, once admitted into hospital:
• Insert I/V line with saline;
• Give oxygen and be prepared for intubation;
• Apply continuous cardiac monitoring;
• Assess status of calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate and pH;
• Induce a metabolic acidosis with sodium bicarbonate to aid renal clearance and with osmotic
diuretic;
• Treat shock vigorously with saline, or plasma;
• If tetany appears use I/V 10 % calcium gluconate 30 mL slowly, repeat at 20 – 30 minute intervals (
1 -3 mL per minute) until QT intervals return to normal;
• Correct dehydration and implement a forced alkaline diuresis by using sodium bicarbonate. If
patient is aneuric do not discontinue I/V fluids;
• If ventricular fibrillation occurs, vigorously resuscitative efforts are appropriate with DC
cardioversion and I/V lignococaine;
• If aneuric, extra corporeal haemodialysis is effective at removing fluoride;
• On cessation of pain, allow home and review within 24 hours. Any ongoing concerns regarding eye
contact (identified on fluorescence staining) require an urgent ophthalmological opinion. Otherwise,
cover with soframycin eye ointment and pad for 8 hours. Review the next day.
Long Term Complications
No data available.
Further information about the treatment for exposure to this product can be obtained from the Poisons
Information Centre on (08) 13 1126 (Australia only)

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 4 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

Section 5 – Fire Fighting Measures


Product flammability
Fluorosilicic acid is non-flammable and non-combustible. However, on contact with most metals, fluorosilicic
acid will liberate hydrogen gas, which is flammable and explosive.
Suitable extinguishing media
Water spray or fog, foam, dry chemical powder, or carbon dioxide.
Hazard from combustion products
Decomposes on heating producing toxic and corrosive fumes, including hydrogen fluoride and silicon tetra-
fluoride.
Special protective precautions and equipment for fire fighters
Wear full body protective clothing with breathing apparatus. Prevent spillage from entering drains or
waterways. Consider evacuation. Use water to control fire and cool adjacent area and fire exposed
fluorosilicic acid storage containers. Do not approach fluorosilicic acid containers suspected to be hot. If safe
and practicable to do so remove fluorosilicic acid containers from path of fire. Equipment should be
thoroughly decontaminated after use.
Wear self-contained breathing apparatus.
After intervention, take shower, remove clothing carefully, clean and check equipment.
Hazchem Code
2X

Section 6 – Accidental Release Measures


Emergency procedures
The hazardous nature of fluorosilicic acid, require emergency and spill procedures to be effective to avoid
both human and environmental exposure. Hazardous conditions may result if material is managed improperly.
Make plans in advance to handle possible emergencies, including obtaining stocks of absorbent materials.
Always wear recommended personal protective equipment and respiratory protection. Good ventilation is
necessary.
Fluorosilicic acid dissolves very readily in water.
Methods and Materials for containment and clean up
For ALL spills, evacuate unprotected personnel upwind and out of danger.
Shut off fluorosilicic acid supply, if safe to do so. Shut off all possible sources of ignition. Stay upwind of
vapours. Restrict access to spill site.
Small Leaks
Fluorosilicic acid fumes: Increase ventilation and allow fumes to vent to a safe area
Fluorosilicic acid liquid: If possible contain the surface area of a spill by bunding with sand, earth or
vermiculite. Dilute spill with water, then neutralise with lime or soda ash to pH 6 to 10.
Prevent run-off into drains and waterways.
Large Leaks
Fluorosilicic acid fumes: Use water fog to dampen cloud of fluorosilicic acid fumes and reduce vapours.
Fluorosilicic acid liquid: If possible contain the surface area of a spill by bunding with sand, earth or
vermiculite. Use foam blanket, at least 150 mm thick, to cover fluorosilicic acid and thus minimise evolution
of acid fumes. Use water fog to dampen fluorosilicic acid fumes and reduce vapours.
Prevent run-off into drains and waterways.
Notify Fire and Rescue Services, for additional specialist advice contact the emergency number as per section
1 of this MSDS.
Dispose of all contained spill residues in accordance with the requirements of the Department of Environment.
For the management of fluorosilicic acid emergencies during transport by road or rail, SAA/SNZ HB76:
Dangerous Goods-Initial Response Guide, Guide 37 should be consulted. This Guide should be carried at all
times when fluorosilicic acid is being transported.

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 5 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

Clean up personnel will need personal protection equipment and respiratory protection. Portable safety shower
and eyewash facilities may also be needed for clean up personnel. Bags of neutralising agent or chemical
absorbent and substantial amounts of water will be required for large spill. A front-end loader may be required
to scoop up neutralised acid/lime/soda ash residue. Foam blanket may be required for large spills.

Section 7 – Handling and Storage


Precautions for safe handling
Regulated dangerous goods as Class 8 Corrosive. Proper protective clothing to be worn includes: PVC jacket
and pants, PVC gauntlet gloves, goggles and face shield, chemical resistant safety boots. A safety shower and
eyewash should be available. Do not breathe vapour or mist. Avoid contact with skin, eyes and clothing.
In dilution process, do not add water to fluorosilicic acid, fluorosilicic acid should be added to plenty of water.
Do not smoke anywhere near the storage and handling of fluorosilicic acid or associated pipework and
equipment.
Do not touch damaged containers or spilled material unless wearing appropriate personal protective
equipment.
Change and wash clothing, and personal protective equipment if contaminated, or before storing and/or re-
using. Wash hands and face thoroughly after handling and before work breaks, eating, drinking, smoking and
using toilet facilities.
Conditions for safe storage, including any incompatibilities
Ensure fluorosilicic acid in bulk is stored and handled in accordance with Australian Standard AS 3780 The
storage and handling of corrosive substances. Ensure adequate ventilation to keep airborne concentration
below exposure standard. Where necessary, use local exhaust ventilation in conjunction with P2 canister
respirator, or as appropriate, self contained breathing apparatus.
Store away from strong alkalis, hypochlorites, cyanides, organic and combustible materials.
Fluorosilicic acid is highly corrosive to most metals, and is incompatible with glass and stoneware.

Section 8 – Exposure Controls/Personal Protection


National exposure standards
ES-TWA ES-STEL ES-Peak
2·5 mg/m3 as fluorides (F) No data assigned by NOHSC No data assigned by NOHSC
Biological limit values
No data available.
Engineering controls
Handle fluorosilicic acid within closed systems whenever possible. Provide adequate ventilation particularly
close to floor level.
Personal protective equipment
Whenever the risk of exposure exists, such as tanker loading/unloading procedures, non-routine operations
and emergency circumstances, the following personal protection measures are recommended:
Respiratory protection
Self contained breathing apparatus recommended where risk of exposure to fluorosilicic acid or
decomposition fumes exits.
Hand protection
PVC or butyl rubber gauntlet-type gloves.
Eye protection
Chemical splash goggles (gas tight type preferred) and full face shield.
Skin protection
PVC overalls or jacket and pants and butyl rubber Wellington boots.

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 6 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

Section 9 – Physical and Chemical Properties


Appearance (colour, physical form, shape)
Cloudy grey liquid.
Odour
Slight pungent and unpleasant odour
pH
10% solution < 1
Vapour pressure
Approximately 24 mm mercury at 25°C
Vapour density
No data available
Boiling point/range Freezing/melting point
105°C at 101·3 kPa, with decomposition Freezes between -18°C and -20°C at 101·3 kPa
Solubility
Miscible in water in all proportions; soluble in methanol; insoluble in diethyl ether.
Specific gravity or density
Specific gravity = 1·18 at 20°C
Flash point and method of detecting flash point
Not applicable
Upper and lower flammable (explosive) limits in air
Not applicable
Ignition temperature
Not applicable
Viscosity
Approximately 6·5 mPa.s at 15·5°C

Section 10 – Stability and Reactivity


Chemical stability
Stable at ambient conditions.
Conditions to avoid
Decomposes in heat giving off toxic fluoride compounds, including fluorosilicic acid fumes and silicon
tetrafluoride.
Incompatible materials
Corrosive to most metals. Incompatible with glass and stoneware. Incompatible with strong alkalis and strong
concentrated acids. Reacts with oxidizing agents, combustible solids and organic peroxides.
Hazardous decomposition products
When heated to decomposition, emits toxic fluoride compounds, including fluorosilicic acid fumes and silicon
tetrafluoride. Reaction with metals produces flammable hydrogen gas.
Hazardous reactions
Fluorosilicic acid may react violently with alkaline materials.

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 7 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

Section 11 – Toxicological Information


HEALTH EFFECTS
When handled in accordance with the guidelines in this material safety data sheet, fluorosilicic acid
should not present any health effects. If this product is mishandled, the following symptoms may
develop:
Acute:
Fluorosilicic acid is an acute irritant to the skin, eyes and mucous membranes and lungs. The acid and
its vapour are moderately toxic. Fluoride effects may be delayed up to 24 hours, depending upon the
fluoride ion concentration.
Inhalation:
Severe irritant to the respiratory tract. Over exposure at high levels may result in mucous membrane irritation
of the nose and throat with coughing, shortness of breath and pulmonary oedema (accumulation of fluid in
lungs). Asthma can also be aggravated by exposure to fluorosilicic acid mists. Vapour, LC50 (Inhalation, rat) =
850 to 1,070 ppm at 1 hour.
Skin:
Severe irritant. Prolonged contact may result in irritation, itching and possible skin rash.
Eye:
Severe irritant. Contact may result in lacrimation, irritation, pain, redness and conjunctivitis. Prolonged
contact may lead to corneal burns and possible permanent damage.
Swallowed:
Severe irritant. Ingestion may cause burns of the intestinal tract leading to vomiting, acidosis, bloody
diarrhoea, wheezing, laryngitis, shortness of breath, headache and shock. Circulatory system may be affected
with symptoms of shock, rapid, weak or no pulse, severe hypotension and pulmonary changes with dyspnea
and emphysema. In some cases, necrosis and haemorrhage of the gastrointestinal tract, liver damage and death
may occur. Scarring of the gastrointestinal tract may occur in non-fatal cases. LD50 (Oral, rat) = 410 mg/kg.
Chronic:
Chronic exposure to fluorosilicic acid may lead to sclerosis of the bones, calcification of ligaments, loss of
weight, anaemia and teeth disorders. At low levels, chronic exposure can lead to nose bleeds and sinus
problems.

Section 12 – Ecological Information


Ecotoxicity
Accidental spillage of fluorosilicic acid may suddenly reduce pH levels in an aquatic environment. No visible
toxic effects have been observed on biological components such as plants and algae, although fluorosilicic
acid is moderately toxic to molluscs and fish. However, hazard for the aquatic environment is limited due to
fluorosilicic acid having low chronic properties. The acid is highly dependent on environmental conditions:
pH, temperature, oxidoreductive potential, mineral and organic content of the medium.
Persistence and degradability
Abiotic:
• Air – neutralisation by natural alkalinity;
• Water/Soil – ionisation/neutralisation of inorganic and organic materials;
• Water/Soil – complexation/precipitation of inorganic materials.
Degradation product: aluminium/iron/calcium/phosphate complexes and /or precipitates, as a
function of pH (fluorides).

Biotic; Not applicable as fluorosilicic acid is an inorganic compound.

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 8 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

Mobility
• Air – mobility in aerosol form;
• Water – considerable solubility and mobility;
• Soil/Sediments – adsorption on minerals soil constituents – the proton occurring in clay may assist
with neutralisation; may dissolve carbonate based materials; some material may remain for transport
down towards the water table – on reaching the ground water table, the remnants of the acid may
continue to move, in the direction of the ground water flow;
• Conditions: slightly acid pH (fluorides) - lime addition may be required to rectify low pH resulting
from fluorosilicic acid spillages.
Environmental fate (exposure)
Acute ecotoxicity:
Fish: 96 hr LC50 (Salmo gairdneri): 51 mg/L, (as fluoride);
Crustaceans: 48 hr EC50 (Daphnia magna): 97 mg/L, (as fluoride), in fresh water conditions;
Crustaceans: 96 hr EC50 (Mysidopsis bahia): 10· 5 mg/L, (as fluoride), in salt water conditions;
Algae: 96 hr EC50 (Scenedesmus sp.): 43 mg/L, (as fluoride).

Chronic ecotoxicity:
Fish: 21 days LC50 (Salmo gairdneri): from 2·7 - 4· 7 mg/L, (as fluoride);
Crustaceans: 21 days NOEC (Daphnia magna): 3·7 mg/L, (as fluoride).
Bioaccumulative potential
Fluorosilicic acid has potential for bioaccumulation as fluorides into vegetables.

Section 13 – Disposal Considerations


Disposal methods and containers
Due to its inherent properties, hazardous conditions may result if material is managed improperly. Use lime,
or preferably calcium hydroxide or calcium carbonate to precipitate the fluoride ion in the form of calcium
difluoride (CaF2). Dispose of all contained and neutralised spill residue in accordance with Department of
Environment requirements. As required under the ADG Code treat empty containers as filled containers.
Special precautions for landfill or incineration
No data available

Section 14 – Transport Information


UN Number
1778
UN Proper shipping name
Fluorosilicic Acid
Class and subsidiary risk
Class 8 Corrosive. No subsidiary risk.
Packing group
II
Special precautions for user
Not to be loaded with explosives (Class 1), flammable solids; substances liable to spontaneous combustion;
and substances that in contact with water emit flammable gases (Class 4), oxidizing agents (Class 5.1),
organic peroxides (Class 5.2),toxic and infectious substances (Class 6) – where the Class 6 substance is a
cyanide, radioactive substances (class 7) and foodstuffs and foodstuff empties.
Hazchem code
2X

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 9 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

Section 15 – Regulatory Information


Australian regulatory information
SUSDP POISON Schedule 6. Licensing is required for this chemical in some States and Territories.
Listed on the Australian Inventory of Chemical Substances (AICS).
Additional national and/or international regulatory information
OSHA: Hazardous by definition of Hazard Communication Standard (29CFR 1910.1200).

Section 16 – Other Information


Key / legend to abbreviations and acronyms used in the MSDS
NOEC
NOHSC National Occupational Health and Safety Commission
SUSDP Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Drugs and Poisons
EC50: Environmental concentration 50. The concentration of a material, in ppm or ppb, in the
environment (usually water) a single dose of which is expected to cause a biological effect
on 50% of a group of test animals.
ES-TWA Exposure Standard – Time weighted average
ES-STEL Exposure Standard – Short term exposure level
ES-Peak Exposure Standard – Peak level
FORS Federal Office of Road and Safety
LC50: Lethal concentration 50, median lethal concentration
LD50 Lethal dose 50. The single dose of a substance that causes the death of 50% of an animal
population from exposure to the substance by any route other than inhalation
%(wt/wt) Percent amount on a weight per weight basis
%(wt/vol) Percent amount on a weight per volume basis
PPM Parts per million
Zone 1 Class 1 An area in which an explosive gas atmosphere can be expected to occur periodically or
occasionally during normal operation.
(More than 10 hours per year but less than 1000 hours per year)
Literature references
Occupational Safety and Health Regulations 1996, State Law Publisher, Western Australia.
National Code of Practice for the Preparation of Material Safety Data Sheets, [NOHSC:2011(2003)],
Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, April 2003.
Australian Code for the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Road and Rail, 7th Edition, Australian Government
Publishing Service, Canberra, October 2007.
Chemical Rubber Handbook, D.R. Lide, CRC Press, 65th Edition, Boca Ratón, 1987.
Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, R.H. Perry & D. Green, 6th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984.
International Critical Tables of Numerical Data, Physics, Chemistry and Technology, National Research
Council, 1st Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1928.
Condensed Chemical Dictionary, G.G Hawley, 8th Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1950.
Dangerous Properties of Industrial Chemicals, N.I.Sax & R.J. Lewis (Sr), 7th Edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold,
New York, 1984.
Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, F.A. Patty, 3rd Revised Edition, G.D. & F.E. Clayton (Editors),
John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981.
Matheson Gas Data Book, W.Braker & A.L. Mossman, 6th Edition, Matheson Gas Products, Secaucus, 1980.
Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, International Labour Office, 4th Edition, J.M. Stellman
(Editor), Geneva, 1998

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 10 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371

Kirk-Othmer Encyclopaedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edition, Wiley InterScience, New York, 1997.
Ullmann's Encyclopaedia of Industrial Chemistry, F. Ulmann, 6th Edition, Wiley Interscience, New York,
2001.
Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Drugs and Poisons, National Health and Medical Research Council,
Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1992.
Poisons Act 1964, State Law Publisher, Western Australia, Reprinted 22 January 1999.
Adopted National Exposure Standards for Atmospheric Contaminants in the Occupational Environmant,
[NHSC:1003(1991)].
Hazardous Materials Handbook for Emergency Responders, Onguard Training for Life, J. Varela (Editor),
Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1996.
Chemalert www.chemalert.net
Guidance for the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets for Fertilizer Materials, European Fertilizer
Manufacturers Association, online at www.efma.org/Publications/Guidance/Index.asp
Sources for data

Important Notes
1. To the best of our knowledge this document complies with the National Code of Practice for the
Preparation of Material Safety Data Sheets 2nd Edition [NOHSC:2011 (2003)].
2. This material safety data sheet summarises our best knowledge of the health and safety hazard
information of the product and how to safely handle and use the product in the workplace. Each user
should read this material safety data sheet and consider the information in the context of how the
product will be handled and used in the workplace, including in conjunction with other products.
3. If clarification or further information is needed to ensure that an appropriate risk assessment can be
made, the user should contact the Safety and Emergency Services Department, CSBP Limited on
(08) 9411 8777 (Australia), +61 8 9411 8777 (Overseas).
4. Our responsibility for products sold, is subject to our terms and conditions, a copy of which is sent to
our customers, and is also available on request.
5. CSBP reserves the right to make change to material safety data sheets without notice.

IF0862 Version No.9.0 Page 11 of 11


Document last modified: 24 June 2013. PDF created: 26 June 2013.
Safety Data Sheet
1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE MATERIAL AND SUPPLIER
Product Name: CHLORINE
Other name(s): Liquefied chlorine, Liquid chlorine, Diatomic chlorine, Chlorine cylinder (used)

Recommended use of the chemical Disinfection, water treatment, bleaching, metal recovery, neutralising agent, oxidant.
and restrictions on use:

Supplier: Orica Australia Pty Ltd


ABN: 99 004 117 828
Street Address: 1 Nicholson Street,
Melbourne 3000
Australia

Telephone Number: +61 3 9665 7111


Facsimile: +61 3 9665 7937
Emergency Telephone: 1 800 033 111 (ALL HOURS)

2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the Australian Dangerous Goods Code (ADG Code) for Transport by Road
and Rail; DANGEROUS GOODS.

This material is hazardous according to Safe Work Australia; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE.


Classification of the substance or mixture:
Oxidising Gases - Category 1
Gases under pressure - Liquefied Gas
Skin Irritation - Category 2
Eye Irritation - Category 2A
Acute Inhalation Toxicity - Category 3
Specific target organ toxicity (single exposure) - Category 3

The following health/environmental hazard categories fall outside the scope of the Workplace Health and Safety Regulations:
Acute Aquatic Toxicity - Category 1

SIGNAL WORD: DANGER

TOXIC OXIDIZING CORROSIVE


GAS AGENT
2 5.1 8

Hazard Statement(s):
H270 May cause or intensify fire; oxidizer.
H280 Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated.
H315 Causes skin irritation.
H319 Causes serious eye irritation.
H331 Toxic if inhaled.
H335 May cause respiratory irritation.
H400 Very toxic to aquatic life.

Product Name: CHLORINE Issued: 26/08/2013


Substance No: 000031098201 Version: 9
Page 1 of 8
Safety Data Sheet
Precautionary Statement(s):

Prevention:
P220 Keep / Store away from clothing / incompatible materials / combustible materials.
P244 Keep valves and fittings free from oil and grease.
P261 Avoid breathing dust / fume / gas / mist / vapours / spray.
P271 Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area.
P264 Wash hands thoroughly after handling.
P280 Wear protective gloves / protective clothing / eye protection / face protection.
P273 Avoid release to the environment.

Response:
P302+P352 IF ON SKIN: Wash with plenty of soap and water.
P332+P313 If skin irritation occurs: Get medical advice/attention.
P362 Take off contaminated clothing and wash before reuse.
P321 Specific treatment (see First Aid Measures on Safety Data Sheet).
P304+P340 IF INHALED: Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing.
P311 Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician.
P305+P351+P338 IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do.
Continue rinsing.
P337+P313 If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention.
P312 Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician if you feel unwell.
P370+P378 In case of fire: Use extinguishing media as outlined in Section 5 of this Safety Data Sheet to extinguish.
P391 Collect spillage.

Storage:
P403+P233 Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep container tightly closed.
P405 Store locked up.

Disposal:
P501 Dispose of contents/container in accordance with local/regional/national/international regulations.

Poisons Schedule (SUSMP): S7 Dangerous Poison.

3. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Components CAS Number Proportion Hazard Codes
Chlorine 7782-50-5 >=99.8% H331 H319 H335 H315
H400

4. FIRST AID MEASURES


For advice, contact a Poisons Information Centre (e.g. phone Australia 131 126; New Zealand 0800 764 766) or a doctor at
once.

Inhalation:
Remove victim from area of exposure - avoid becoming a casualty. Remove contaminated clothing and loosen remaining
clothing. Allow patient to assume most comfortable position and keep warm. Keep at rest until fully recovered. If patient finds
breathing difficult and develops a bluish discolouration of the skin (which suggests a lack of oxygen in the blood - cyanosis),
ensure airways are clear of any obstruction and have a qualified person give oxygen through a face mask. Apply artificial
respiration if patient is not breathing. Seek immediate medical advice.

Skin Contact:
If skin or hair contact occurs, immediately remove any contaminated clothing and wash skin and hair thoroughly with running
water. If swelling, redness, blistering or irritation occurs seek medical assistance. For skin burns, cover with a clean, dry
dressing until medical help is available. Launder contaminated clothing before reuse.

Product Name: CHLORINE Issued: 26/08/2013


Substance No: 000031098201 Version: 9
Page 2 of 8
Safety Data Sheet
Eye Contact:
If in eyes, hold eyelids apart and flush the eye continuously with running water. Continue flushing until advised to stop by a
Poisons Information Centre or a doctor, or for at least 15 minutes.

Ingestion:
Immediately rinse mouth with water. If swallowed, do NOT induce vomiting. Give a glass of water. Seek immediate medical
assistance.

Indication of immediate medical attention and special treatment needed:


Treat symptomatically. Effects may be delayed. Delayed pulmonary oedema may result.

5. FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES


Suitable Extinguishing Media:
Not combustible, however, if material is involved in a fire use: Fine water spray, normal foam, dry agent (carbon dioxide, dry
chemical powder).

Hazchem or Emergency Action Code: 2XE

Specific hazards arising from the substance or mixture:


Non combustible, but will support combustion of other materials. Oxidizing substance.

Special protective equipment and precautions for fire-fighters:


Not combustible, however will support the combustion of other materials. Keep containers cool with water spray. Heating can
cause expansion or decomposition of the material, which can lead to the containers exploding. If safe to do so, remove
containers from the path of fire. Only move cool cylinders. Do not approach cylinders suspected to be hot. Fire fighters to
wear self-contained breathing apparatus and suitable protective clothing if risk of exposure. If unable to keep cylinders cool,
evacuate area.

6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES


Emergency procedures/Environmental precautions:
Clear area of all unprotected personnel. Evacuate personnel from downwind areas. Wear protective equipment to prevent skin
and eye contact and inhalation of vapours/dusts. Avoid breathing in vapours. Work up wind or increase ventilation. Wear self
contained breathing apparatus. Shut off leak if possible without risk. Work up wind. Use water spray to disperse vapour. DO
NOT spray water directly on the leak, liquid chlorine or chlorine container. If safe to do so, rotate container so that gas and
not liquid escapes. SMALL SPILLS: Allow liquid to evaporate.

Seek specialist advice. For large spills notify the Emergency Services.

Chlorine gas only becomes visible at high concentrations.

Personal precautions/Protective equipment/Methods and materials for containment and cleaning up:
Clear area of all unprotected personnel. Wear protective equipment to prevent skin and eye contact and breathing in vapours.
Avoid breathing in vapours. Work up wind or increase ventilation. Air-supplied masks are recommended to avoid inhalation of
toxic material. For gas leak, DO NOT spray water directly on the leak or chlorine container. Use fire hoses equipped with fog
nozzles to disperse gas downwind. For liquid: Contain - prevent run off into drains and waterways. Use fog nozzles as
before. Do NOT allow any water to fall onto a pool of liquid chlorine as this will increase gas cloud. If safe to do so, cover with
large plastic sheet. Where possible vapour knock down water should be contained.

7. HANDLING AND STORAGE


This material is a Scheduled Poison S7 and must be stored, maintained and used in accordance with the relevant
regulations.

Product Name: CHLORINE Issued: 26/08/2013


Substance No: 000031098201 Version: 9
Page 3 of 8
Safety Data Sheet
Precautions for safe handling:
Avoid skin and eye contact and breathing in vapour. Avoid all contact.

Conditions for safe storage, including any incompatibilities:


Store in a well ventilated area. Store away from foodstuffs. Store away from combustible materials. Store away from
incompatible materials described in Section 10. Keep dry - reacts with water. Cylinders should be securely restrained so that
they are kept upright at all times. Drums should be stored horizontally. Keep containers closed when not in use - check
regularly for leaks.

8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION


Chlorine: Peak Limitation = 3 mg/m3 (1 ppm)

As published by Safe Work Australia Workplace Exposure Standards for Airborne Contaminants.

Peak Limitation - a maximum or peak airborne concentration of a particular substance determined over the shortest
analytically practicable period of time which does not exceed 15 minutes.

These Workplace Exposure Standards are guides to be used in the control of occupational health hazards. All atmospheric
contamination should be kept to as low a level as is workable. These workplace exposure standards should not be used as
fine dividing lines between safe and dangerous concentrations of chemicals. They are not a measure of relative toxicity.

Appropriate engineering controls:


Ensure ventilation is adequate to maintain air concentrations below Workplace Exposure Standards. If inhalation risk exists:
Use with local exhaust ventilation or while wearing air supplied mask. Vapour heavier than air - prevent concentration in
hollows or sumps. DO NOT enter confined spaces where vapour may have collected.

Individual protection measures, such as Personal Protective Equipment (PPE):


The selection of PPE is dependent on a detailed risk assessment. The risk assessment should consider the work situation,
the physical form of the chemical, the handling methods, and environmental factors.

Orica Personal Protection Guide No. 1, 1998: I - OVERALLS, CHEMICAL GOGGLES, SAFETY SHOES, FACE SHIELD OR
AIR MASK, GLOVES (Long).
* Not required if wearing air supplied mask.

Wear overalls, chemical goggles, full face shield, elbow-length impervious gloves. Use with adequate ventilation. If inhalation
risk exists, wear air-supplied mask meeting the requirements of AS/NZS 1715 and AS/NZS 1716. Always wash hands
before smoking, eating, drinking or using the toilet. Wash contaminated clothing and other protective equipment before
storage or re-use.

9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES


Physical state: Gas / Liquid
Colour: Greenish - Yellow (high concentrations) ; Clear/invisible (low concentrations)
Odour: Pungent , Irritating
Odour Threshold: 1 ppm (approx)
Molecular Formula: Cl2
Product Name: CHLORINE Issued: 26/08/2013
Substance No: 000031098201 Version: 9
Page 4 of 8
Safety Data Sheet
9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Specific Gravity: 1.468 (liquid); 1.56 (@ -35°C).
Relative Vapour Density (air=1): 2.4
Vapour Pressure (20 °C): 666 kPa
Flash Point (°C): Not applicable.
% Volatile by Volume: ca. 100
Solubility in water (g/L): 7300 mg/L
Boiling Point/Range (°C): -34
Freezing Point/Range (°C): -101

10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY


Reactivity: Reacts violently with many organic chemicals (e.g. mineral oils, greases),
hydrocarbons, silicones, and finely divided metals. Forms explosive mixtures with
alcohols, glycols, ammonia and its compounds, and hydrogen over a wide range of
concentrations.

Chemical stability: Reactive chemical. Corrosive in the presence of moisture.

Possibility of hazardous reactions:Oxidising agent. Supports combustion of other materials and increases intensity of a
fire. Corrosive to some metals in the presence of moisture. (brass, copper, lead, nickel,
steel and stainless steel) Heating can cause expansion or decomposition of the
material, which can lead to the containers exploding. Can react with acids and some
nitrogen or phosphorous compounds. Hazardous polymerisation will not occur.

Conditions to avoid: Avoid exposure to heat, sources of ignition, and open flame. Avoid contact with
combustible substances. Do not allow water to come into contact with liquid chlorine.

Incompatible materials: Incompatible with combustible materials. Incompatible with heat and hot surfaces.
Incompatible with reducing agents.

Hazardous decomposition Oxides of chlorine. Chlorine compounds.


products:

11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION


No adverse health effects expected if the product is handled in accordance with this Safety Data Sheet and the product
label. Symptoms or effects that may arise if the product is mishandled and overexposure occurs are:

Ingestion: Not a likely route of exposure, however, swallowing liquid will result in freeze burns of
the mouth, throat and stomach. Swallowing can result in chemical burns to the mouth,
throat and abdomen; perforation of the gastrointestinal tract and vomiting of blood and
eroded tissue.

Eye contact: A severe eye irritant. Corrosive to eyes; contact can cause corneal burns.
Contamination of eyes can result in permanent injury. Liquid splashes or spray may
cause freeze burns to the eye.

Skin contact: Liquid chlorine is corrosive to skin. Contact with skin will result in irritation. Liquid
splashes or spray may cause freeze burns.

Inhalation: Material is irritant to the mucous membranes of the respiratory tract (airways). May
cause coughing and shortness of breath. May cause adverse lung effects if high
concentrations are inhaled. Inhalation of vapours may cause severe breathing difficulties
and lung oedema. Delayed (up to 48 hours) fluid build up in the lungs may occur.
Severe exposure may cause lung damage. Overexposure may result in death.

Product Name: CHLORINE Issued: 26/08/2013


Substance No: 000031098201 Version: 9
Page 5 of 8
Safety Data Sheet
Acute toxicity:
Inhalation LC50 (rat): 293 ppm/1hr.
Inhalation LC50 (mice): 137 ppm/1hr.

Skin corrosion/irritation: Corrosive (rabbit).


Serious eye damage/irritation: Severe irritant (rabbit).
Chronic effects: No information available for the product.

12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION


Ecotoxicity Avoid contaminating waterways.

Persistence/degradability: Does not accumulate in organisms. The material is not expected to bioconcentrate.

Aquatic toxicity: Very toxic to aquatic organisms.

96hr LC50 (fish): 0.014 mg/L


Terrestrial toxicity: Very ecotoxic in the soil environment.

13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS


Disposal methods:
Refer to Waste Management Authority. Dispose of material through a licensed waste contractor. Contact supplier for advice.
For all Orica labelled chlorine packages, return directly to Orica.

14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION


Road and Rail Transport
Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the Australian Dangerous Goods Code (ADG Code) for Transport by Road
and Rail; DANGEROUS GOODS.

TOXIC OXIDIZING CORROSIVE


GAS AGENT
2 5.1 8

UN No: 1017
Transport Hazard Class: 2.3 Toxic Gas
Subrisk 1: 5.1 Oxidising Agent
Subrisk 2: 8 Corrosive
Proper Shipping Name or CHLORINE
Technical Name:

Hazchem or Emergency Action 2XE


Code:

Marine Transport
Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code) for
transport by sea; DANGEROUS GOODS.

UN No: 1017
Transport Hazard Class: 2.3 Toxic Gas
Subrisk 1: 5.1 Oxidising Agent
Subrisk 2: 8 Corrosive
Product Name: CHLORINE Issued: 26/08/2013
Substance No: 000031098201 Version: 9
Page 6 of 8
Safety Data Sheet
Proper Shipping Name or CHLORINE
Technical Name:

IMDG EMS Fire: F-C


IMDG EMS Spill: S-U

Marine Pollutant Yes

Air Transport
TRANSPORT PROHIBITED under the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations for
transport by air in passenger aircraft and cargo aircraft.

15. REGULATORY INFORMATION


Classification:
This material is hazardous according to Safe Work Australia; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE.

Classification of the substance or mixture:


Oxidising Gases - Category 1
Gases under pressure - Liquefied Gas
Skin Irritation - Category 2
Eye Irritation - Category 2A
Acute Inhalation Toxicity - Category 3
Specific target organ toxicity (single exposure) - Category 3

The following health/environmental hazard categories fall outside the scope of the Workplace Health and Safety Regulations:
Acute Aquatic Toxicity - Category 1

Hazard Statement(s):
H270 May cause or intensify fire; oxidizer.
H280 Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated.
H315 Causes skin irritation.
H319 Causes serious eye irritation.
H331 Toxic if inhaled.
H335 May cause respiratory irritation.
H400 Very toxic to aquatic life.

Poisons Schedule (SUSMP): S7 Dangerous Poison.

This material is listed on the Australian Inventory of Chemical Substances (AICS).

16. OTHER INFORMATION


`Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances'. Ed. D. Sweet, US Dept. of Health & Human Services: Cincinatti, 2012.

This safety data sheet has been prepared by Orica Toxicology & SDS Services.

Maximum use rate for potable water treatment is 30 mg/L (as per NSF certification)

Reason(s) for Issue:


Change in Handling & Storage Requirements

Product Name: CHLORINE Issued: 26/08/2013


Substance No: 000031098201 Version: 9
Page 7 of 8
Safety Data Sheet
This SDS summarises to our best knowledge at the date of issue, the chemical health and safety hazards of the material
and general guidance on how to safely handle the material in the workplace. Since Orica Limited cannot anticipate or control
the conditions under which the product may be used, each user must, prior to usage, assess and control the risks arising
from its use of the material.

If clarification or further information is needed, the user should contact their Orica representative or Orica Limited at the
contact details on page 1.

Orica Limited's responsibility for the material as sold is subject to the terms and conditions of sale, a copy of which is
available upon request.

Product Name: CHLORINE Issued: 26/08/2013


Substance No: 000031098201 Version: 9
Page 8 of 8
Product Name CAUSTIC SODA 50% (COOGEE CHEMICALS)

1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE MATERIAL AND SUPPLIER


Supplier Name COOGEE CHEMICALS
Address Cnr of Patterson and Kwinana Beach Roads, Kwinana, WA, AUSTRALIA, 6167
Telephone (08) 9439 8200
Fax (08) 9439 8300
Emergency 1800 800 655
Email businessrelations@coogee.com.au
Web Site http://www.coogee.com.au

Synonym(s) NAOH • SODA LYE • SODIUM HYDROXIDE

Use(s) LABORATORY APPLICATIONS • LABORATORY REAGENT


SDS Date 16 Jul 2010

2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
CLASSIFIED AS HAZARDOUS ACCORDING TO SAFE WORK AUSTRALIA CRITERIA

RISK PHRASES
R35 Causes severe burns.
SAFETY PHRASES
S2 Keep out of reach of children.
S26 In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical advice
S37/39 Wear suitable gloves and eye/face protection.

CLASSIFIED AS A DANGEROUS GOOD BY THE CRITERIA OF THE ADG CODE


UN No. 1824 DG Class 8 Subsidiary Risk(s) None Allocated
Packing Group II Hazchem Code 2R

3. COMPOSITION/ INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS


Ingredient Formula CAS No. Content
SODIUM HYDROXIDE Na-OH 1310-73-2 50%
WATER H2O 7732-18-5 Not Available

4. FIRST AID MEASURES


Eye If in eyes, hold eyelids apart and flush continuously with running water. Continue flushing until advised to stop by a
Poisons Information Centre, a doctor, or for at least 15 minutes.
Inhalation If inhaled, remove from contaminated area. To protect rescuer, use an Air-line respirator where an inhalation risk
exists. Apply artificial respiration if not breathing.
Skin If skin or hair contact occurs, remove contaminated clothing and flush skin and hair with running water. Continue
flushing with water until advised to stop by a Poisons Information Centre or a doctor.
Ingestion For advice, contact a Poison Information Centre on 13 11 26 (Australia Wide) or a doctor (at once). If swallowed,
do not induce vomiting.
Advice to Doctor CORROSIVE POISONING TREATMENT: Immediate treatment preferably in a hospital is mandatory. In treating
corrosive poisoning, DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING; DO NOT ATTEMPT GASTRIC LAVAGE; and DO NOT
Page 1 of 4
RMT
Reviewed: 16 Jul 2010
Printed: 16 Jul 2010
Product Name CAUSTIC SODA 50% (COOGEE CHEMICALS)
ATTEMPT TO NEUTRALISE THE CORROSIVE SUBSTANCE. Vomiting will increase the severity of damage to
the oesophagus as the corrosive substance will again come in contact with it. Attempting gastric lavage may result
in perforating either the oesophagus or stomach.

Immediately dilute the corrosive substance by having the patient drink milk or water. If the trachea has been
damaged tracheostamy may be required. For oesophageal burns begin broad-spectrum antibiotics and
corticosteroid therapy. Intravenous fluids will be required if oesophageal or gastric damage prevents ingestion of
liquids. Long-range therapy will be directed toward preventing or treating oesophageal scars and strictures.
First Aid Facilities Eye wash facilities and safety shower should be available.

5. FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES


Flammability Non flammable. May evolve toxic gases if strongly heated. May evolve flammable hydrogen gas in contact with
some metals.
Fire and Evacuate area and contact emergency services. Toxic gases may be evolved in a fire situation. Remain upwind
Explosion and notify those downwind of hazard. Wear full protective equipment including Self Contained Breathing
Apparatus (SCBA) when combating fire. Use waterfog to cool intact containers and nearby storage areas.
Extinguishing Prevent contamination of drains or waterways.

Hazchem Code 2R

6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES


Spillage Contact emergency services where appropriate. Use personal protective equipment. Clear area of all unprotected
personnel. Ventilate area where possible. Contain spillage, then cover / absorb spill with non-combustible
absorbant material (vermiculite, sand, or similar), collect and place in suitable containers for reuse, treatment
and/or disposal.

7. STORAGE AND HANDLING


Storage Store in a cool, dry, well ventilated area, removed from oxidising agents, acids, active metals, heat or ignition
sources and foodstuffs. Ensure containers are adequately labelled, protected from physical damage and sealed
when not in use. Large storage areas should be bunded and have appropriate ventilation systems.
Handling Before use carefully read the product label. Use of safe work practices are recommended to avoid eye or skin
contact and inhalation. Observe good personal hygiene, including washing hands before eating. Prohibit eating,
drinking and smoking in contaminated areas.

8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS/ PERSONAL PROTECTION


Exposure Stds
Ingredient Reference TWA STEL
Sodium hydroxide (peak limitation) ASCC (AUS) -- 2 mg/m3 -- --

Biological Limits No biological limit allocated.

Engineering Avoid inhalation. Use in well ventilated areas. Where an inhalation risk exists, mechanical extraction ventilation is
Controls recommended. Maintain vapour levels below the recommended exposure standard.
PPE Wear PVC or rubber gloves, splash-proof goggles, a PVC apron, rubber boots, full PVC coveralls (or better)
and a faceshield. At high vapour levels, wear: an Air-line respirator.

9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES


Appearance CLEAR LIQUID Solubility (water) SOLUBLE
Odour SLIGHT ODOUR Specific Gravity 1.52
pH > 14 % Volatiles 50 %
Vapour Pressure NOT RELEVANT Flammability NON FLAMMABLE
Vapour Density NOT AVAILABLE Flash Point NOT RELEVANT

Page 2 of 4
RMT
Reviewed: 16 Jul 2010
Printed: 16 Jul 2010
Product Name CAUSTIC SODA 50% (COOGEE CHEMICALS)

Boiling Point 142°C Upper Explosion Limit NOT RELEVANT


Melting Point 12°C Lower Explosion Limit NOT RELEVANT
Evaporation Rate NOT RELEVANT

10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY


Chemical Stability Stable under recommended conditions of storage.
Conditions to Avoid Avoid heat, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources.
Material to Avoid Incompatible with oxidising agents, acids (eg. nitric acid), metals, heat and ignition sources.
Hazardous May evolve toxic gases if heated to decomposition.
Decomposition
Products
Hazardous Reactions Polymerization is not expected to occur.

11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION


Health Hazard Highly corrosive. This product has the potential to cause serious adverse health effects. Use safe work practices
Summary to avoid eye or skin contact and inhalation. Over exposure may result in severe skin, eye and respiratory burns
with possible permanent tissue damage. Upon dilution, the potential for adverse health effects may be reduced.
Eye Highly corrosive. Contact may result in irritation, lacrimation, pain, redness, conjunctivitis and corneal burns with
possible permanent damage.
Inhalation Corrosive. Over exposure may result in irritation of the nose and throat, coughing and bronchitis. High level
exposure may result in ulceration of the respiratory tract, lung tissue damage, chemical pneumonitis and
pulmonary oedema. Effects may be delayed.
Skin Corrosive. Contact may result in irritation, redness, pain, rash, dermatitis and possible burns. Effects may be
delayed.
Ingestion Highly corrosive. Ingestion may result in burns to the mouth and throat, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and
diarrhoea. Ingestion of large quantities may result in ulceration, unconsciousness, convulsions and death.
Toxicity Data SODIUM HYDROXIDE (1310-73-2)
LD50 (Intraperitoneal): 40 mg/kg (mouse)
LDLo (Ingestion): 1.57 mg/kg (human)

12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION


Environment WATER: If released to waterways, alkaline products may change the pH of the waterway. Fish will die if the pH
reaches 10-11 (goldfish 10.9, bluegill 10.5). SOIL: May leach to groundwater with toxic effects on aquatic life as
above. ATMOSPHERE: Not expected to reside in the atmosphere. Drops or particles released to atmosphere
should be removed by gravity and/or be rained out.

13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS


Waste Disposal Neutralise with dilute acid (eg. 3 mol/L hydrochloric acid) or similar. For small amounts absorb with sand or similar
and dispose of to an approved landfill site. Contact the manufacturer for additional information.
Legislation Dispose of in accordance with relevant local legislation.

14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION

CLASSIFIED AS A DANGEROUS GOOD BY THE CRITERIA OF THE ADG CODE

Shipping Name SODIUM HYDROXIDE SOLUTION


UN No. 1824 DG Class 8 Subsidiary Risk(s) None Allocated
Packing Group II Hazchem Code 2R GTEPG 8A1

Page 3 of 4
RMT
Reviewed: 16 Jul 2010
Printed: 16 Jul 2010
Product Name CAUSTIC SODA 50% (COOGEE CHEMICALS)

15. REGULATORY INFORMATION


Poison Schedule Classified as a Schedule 6 (S6) Poison using the criteria in the Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Drugs and
Poisons (SUSDP).
AICS All chemicals listed on the Australian Inventory of Chemical Substances (AICS).

16. OTHER INFORMATION


Additional RESPIRATORS: In general the use of respirators should be limited and engineering controls employed to avoid
Information exposure. If respiratory equipment must be worn ensure correct respirator selection and training is undertaken.
Remember that some respirators may be extremely uncomfortable when used for long periods. The use of air
powered or air supplied respirators should be considered where prolonged or repeated use is necessary.

EXPOSURE STANDARDS - TIME WEIGHTED AVERAGE (TWA) or WES (WORKPLACE EXPOSURE


STANDARD) (NZ): Exposure standards are established on the premise of an 8 hour work period of normal
intensity, under normal climatic conditions and where a 16 hour break between shifts exists to enable the body to
eliminate absorbed contaminants. In the following circumstances, exposure standards must be reduced: strenuous
work conditions; hot, humid climates; high altitude conditions; extended shifts (which increase the exposure period
and shorten the period of recuperation).

ABBREVIATIONS:
ADB - Air-Dry Basis.
BEI - Biological Exposure Indice(s)
CAS# - Chemical Abstract Service number - used to uniquely identify chemical compounds.
CNS - Central Nervous System.
EC No - European Community Number.
IARC - International Agency for Research on Cancer.
M - moles per litre, a unit of concentration.
mg/m3 - Milligrams per cubic metre.
NOS - Not Otherwise Specified.
NTP - National Toxicology Program.
OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
pH - relates to hydrogen ion concentration using a scale of 0 (high acidic) to 14 (highly alkaline).
ppm - Parts Per Million.
RTECS - Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances.
TWA/ES - Time Weighted Average or Exposure Standard.
HEALTH EFFECTS FROM EXPOSURE:
It should be noted that the effects from exposure to this product will depend on several factors including: frequency
and duration of use; quantity used; effectiveness of control measures; protective equipment used and method of
application. Given that it is impractical to prepare a Chem Alert report which would encompass all possible
scenarios, it is anticipated that users will assess the risks and apply control methods where appropriate.

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT GUIDELINES:


The recommendation for protective equipment contained within this Chem Alert report is provided as a guide only.
Factors such as method of application, working environment, quantity used, product concentration and the
availability of engineering controls should be considered before final selection of personal protective equipment is
made.
Report Status This document has been compiled by RMT on behalf of the manufacturer of the product and serves as the
manufacturer's Safety Data Sheet ('SDS').

It is based on information concerning the product which has been provided to RMT by the manufacturer or
obtained from third party sources and is believed to represent the current state of knowledge as to the appropriate
safety and handling precautions for the product at the time of issue. Further clarification regarding any aspect of
the product should be obtained directly from the manufacturer.

While RMT has taken all due care to include accurate and up-to-date information in this SDS, it does not provide
any warranty as to accuracy or completeness. As far as lawfully possible, RMT accepts no liability for any loss,
injury or damage (including consequential loss) which may be suffered or incurred by any person as a
consequence of their reliance on the information contained in this SDS.

Prepared By Risk Management Technologies


5 Ventnor Ave, West Perth
Western Australia 6005
Phone: +61 8 9322 1711
Fax: +61 8 9322 1794
Email: info@rmt.com.au
Web: www.rmt.com.au
Page 4 of 4
RMT
SDS Date 16 Jul 2010
Reviewed: 16 Jul 2010
End of Report Printed: 16 Jul 2010
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX H
Department of Health Fact Sheet

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Copper in Drinking Water
Introduction
Copper is a metal that exists in the environment as a mineral in rocks and soil. It is
commonly found at low levels in natural water bodies. It is also an essential trace element
that is required to maintain good health.
Copper pipes are used extensively in plumbing systems throughout Western Australia and
in many countries of the world.
However, where copper pipes corrode they can release copper into your drinking water to a
level that can affect its quality and safety. The information contained in this guide will help
you identify signs of copper corrosion and provide advice on how to minimise its effect on
your health.

How does copper get into drinking water?


Low levels of copper can be found naturally in all water sources. However drinking water
left to stagnate for long periods of time in household copper pipes is usually the main cause
of elevated levels of copper.

What are the potential health effects of copper?


The normal adult requires approximately 2 to 3 milligrams of copper per person per day.
More than 90% of your dietary needs for copper is provided by food. Drinking water usually
provides less than 10% of your daily copper intake. Consumption of high levels of copper
can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, gastric complaints and headaches. Long term
exposure over many months and years can cause liver damage and death.

Is drinking water tested for copper?


In Western Australia all potable scheme water supplies are continually monitored by the
Department of Health to ensure copper levels to not exceed Australian Drinking Water
Guidelines (Guidelines).
The Guidelines set two levels for copper:
 1mg/L for aesthetics to prevent taste and staining problems; and
 2mg/L to prevent any health related problems

How can I tell if copper levels in my drinking water are elevated?


It is easy to tell if copper is in your drinking water:
 a low level of copper usually leaves a green/blue stain on taps, pipes, hand basins,
showers or toilets but there is no bitter or metallic taste. This water is still safe to drink.
 a high level of copper usually leaves a metallic or unpleasant bitter taste in the drinking
water. This water may not be safe to drink and you should contact your drinking water
provider or have the water professionally tested (see below).

Keep Drinking Water Clean Make It Safe Prove It’s Safe


Are elevated levels of copper commonly found in drinking water in WA?
No. Scheme water supplies in WA do not contain elevated levels of copper. However,
water left to stagnate in copper pipes of some houses can cause a temporary increase in
copper levels.

Can I reduce the level of copper in my drinking water?


Yes. The easiest and quickest way to reduce the level of copper in your household drinking
water is to either:
 allow the first flush (30 seconds) of water to run to waste (You can collect it to use in
the garden); or
 simply flush the toilet.
Also water filters can be effective in reducing copper levels in your drinking water. The
Environmental Health Guide ‘Water Filters”, provides more information on this topic

How do I test for copper in my drinking water?


Water testing for copper can be done by any National Association of Testing Authorities
(NATA) accredited chemical laboratory. Laboratories can be found in the yellow pages
telephone directory under the heading, “Analysts”.

Can I be tested for copper?


Yes. Testing copper levels in the body can be easily done by your doctor through blood
and urine analysis.
Another form of testing is hair analysis. However, as there is no scientific basis for this
method and an accurate diagnosis cannot be made by this approach.

Hair testing does not provide an accurate measure of copper poisoning.

How can I reduce my exposure to copper?


While copper intake can not be eliminated completely, avoiding foods naturally high in
copper can be helpful in reducing its levels in the body. However, many foods high in
copper are also important components of a healthy diet. Before you change your diet you
should talk to your doctor.

Summary
 Normally less than 10% of your daily copper intake is through water consumption.
 Consumption of high levels of copper can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, gastric
complaints and headaches.
 A high level of copper in your drinking water will leave a metallic or bitter taste. This
water may not be safe to drink and you should contact your drinking water provider of
have the water professionally tested.
 A low level of copper usually leaves a green/blue stain on taps, hand basins showers
etc. This water is still safe to drink.

Water Unit Page 2 of 3


Delivering a Healthy WA
 Running the tap for a short period of time (30 seconds) each morning or flushing the
toilet is the quickest way to reduce the level of copper in you drinking water.
Water filters and can also be used to reduce copper levels in home drinking water supplies.
 All scheme drinking water supplies are continually monitored by the Department of
Health to ensure compliance with the 2004 Australian Drinking Water Guidelines and
do not contain elevated levels of copper.
 Blood and urine testing is the only accurate way to test for copper. See your doctor if
you are concerned about the level of copper in your body

Other Fact sheets available:


 Information Requirements for New Water Treatment Chemicals
 Drinking Water Treatment Procedures for Vehicle Mounted Water Containers
 Recreational Access to Drinking Water Catchments
 Trihalomethanes

More Information:
Water Unit
Environmental Health Directorate
Department of Health
PO Box 8172
PERTH BUSINESS CENTRE WA 6849

Telephone: 08 9388 4999


Facsimile: 08 9388 4910

Printed on: 10 November 2010

\\Wsep218fs6\hpg_sect$\EHD\Water Unit\DRINKING\Publications\Section\Factsheets\Copper\Copper in Drinking Water.doc

Produced by Environmental Health Directorate


© Department of Health, Western Australia 2010

Water Unit Page 3 of 3


Delivering a Healthy WA
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION

APPENDIX I
Limitations

February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
LIMITATIONS

This Document has been provided by Golder Associates Pty Ltd (“Golder”)
subject to the following limitations:

This Document has been prepared for the particular purpose outlined in
Golder’s proposal and no responsibility is accepted for the use of this
Document, in whole or in part, in other contexts or for any other purpose.

The scope and the period of Golder’s Services are as described in Golder’s
proposal, and are subject to restrictions and limitations. Golder did not perform
a complete assessment of all possible conditions or circumstances that may
exist at the site referenced in the Document. If a service is not expressly
indicated, do not assume it has been provided. If a matter is not addressed, do
not assume that any determination has been made by Golder in regards to it.

Conditions may exist which were undetectable given the limited nature of the
enquiry Golder was retained to undertake with respect to the site. Variations in
conditions may occur between investigatory locations, and there may be special
conditions pertaining to the site which have not been revealed by the
investigation and which have not therefore been taken into account in the
Document. Accordingly, additional studies and actions may be required.

In addition, it is recognised that the passage of time affects the information and
assessment provided in this Document. Golder’s opinions are based upon
information that existed at the time of the production of the Document. It is
understood that the Services provided allowed Golder to form no more than an
opinion of the actual conditions of the site at the time the site was visited and
cannot be used to assess the effect of any subsequent changes in the quality of
the site, or its surroundings, or any laws or regulations.

Any assessments made in this Document are based on the conditions indicated
from published sources and the investigation described. No warranty is
included, either express or implied, that the actual conditions will conform
exactly to the assessments contained in this Document.

Where data supplied by the client or other external sources, including previous
site investigation data, have been used, it has been assumed that the
information is correct unless otherwise stated. No responsibility is accepted by
Golder for incomplete or inaccurate data supplied by others.

Golder may have retained subconsultants affiliated with Golder to provide


Services for the benefit of Golder. To the maximum extent allowed by law, the
Client acknowledges and agrees it will not have any direct legal recourse to, and
waives any claim, demand, or cause of action against, Golder’s affiliated
companies, and their employees, officers and directors.

This Document is provided for sole use by the Client and is confidential to it and
its professional advisers. No responsibility whatsoever for the contents of this
Document will be accepted to any person other than the Client. Any use which
a third party makes of this Document, or any reliance on or decisions to be
made based on it, is the responsibility of such third parties. Golder accepts no
responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of
decisions made or actions based on this Document.

GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD GAP Form No. LEG 04 RL 1


Golder Associates Pty Ltd
Level 3, 1 Havelock Street
West Perth, Western Australia 6005
Australia
T: +61 8 9213 7600

S-ar putea să vă placă și