Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Workplace Contaminant
Investigation – Success
Career Fire and Rescue
Station
Submitted to:
Department of Fire and Emergency Services
Emergency Services Complex
20 Stockton Bend
COCKBURN CENTRAL WA 6164
REPORT
List of Acronyms
Acronym Description
ADWG Australian Drinking Water Guidelines
AFFF Aqueous film forming foam
ARMCANZ Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand
ANZECC Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council
ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
COC Chain of custody
COI Chemicals of interest
CSM Conceptual site model
DER Department of Environment Regulation
DFES Department of Fire and Emergency Services
DoH Department of Health
DOW Department of Water
EDI Estimated daily intake
g Gram
µg Microgram (0.001 mg or 0.00001 g)
HAA Haloacetic acids
HIL Health investigation level
HIL A Health investigation level - low density residential
HIL B Health investigation level - high density residential
LOR Limit of reporting
mg Milligram (1/1000 of a g)
NA Not applicable
NATA National Association of Testing Authorities
NEPM National Environmental Protection Measure
NHMRC National Health and Medical Research Council
PCE Tetrachloroethylene (also called Perchloroethylene)
PFOA Perflourooctanoic acid
PFOS Perflourooctane sulfonate
PID Photo-ionisation detector
PSI Preliminary Site Investigation
QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control
TDI Tolerable Daily Intake
THM Total trihalomethanes
TPS Town Planning Scheme
UFU of WA United Firefighters Union of Western Australia
US EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
VOC Volatile organic compound
WALIS Western Australian Land Information System.
WHO World Health Organisation
WTCIATFWG World Trade Center Indoor Air Task Force Working Group
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 1
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
List of Terms
Term Description
Analytes A substance or chemical constituent that is of interest in an analytical procedure.
Buffer A separation distance between land uses.
Contaminated Site A site registered on the DER Contaminated Sites Database.
Effluent Outflow from a sewer or sewage system.
Environmental media Refers to air, soil and water.
Are chemicals that promote the clumping together of suspended particles in liquids
Flocculants
to form a floc.
GhostWipes A brand of swipes used for environmental sampling.
Groundwater is the water located beneath the earth's surface in soil pore spaces
Groundwater
and in the fractures of rock formations.
HAA A by-product of treatment of potable water.
Is the lowest concentration at which an analyte can be detected in a sample and its
LOR
concentration can be reported with a reasonable degree of accuracy and precision
Pathway The connection or connections between a source and the receptor.
Polyelectrolyte Are polymers whose repeating units bear an electrolyte group.
A photoionization detector is a type of gas detector.
Typical photoionization detectors measure volatile organic compounds and other
PID gases in an efficient and inexpensive detector for many gas and vapour analytes.
These hand-held, battery-operated detectors are widely used in military, industrial,
and confined working facilities for safety.
A PSI is the term used to describe the first stage of the process under the
Contaminated Sites Act that includes investigation of records and anecdotal
PSI
material and a site walkover looking for signs of contamination. PSI is a screening
level assessment under the Contaminated Sites Act.
Receptor The person, group, species or environment that may be impacted.
Can be described as a hazard or the presence of a hazard in an environmental
Source
medium that has the capacity to cause harm
Surface water is water on the surface of the planet such as in a drain, stream, river,
Surface Water
lake, wetland, or ocean.
THM A by-product of treatment of potable water
VOC A compound that produces vapour or gas at room temperature
A Town Planning scheme divides the local government district into zones to identify
Zone
areas for particular uses and development allowed in different zones.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 2
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
Table of Contents
5.2.5.2 Soil..................................................................................................................................................... 19
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 3
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
6.5 Soil.............................................................................................................................................................. 22
TABLES
Table 1: Coordinates of Site Boundary ............................................................................................................................... 9
FIGURES
Figure 1: Conceptual Site Model ......................................................................................................................................... 8
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 4
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Figures
APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over
APPENDIX C
Chain of Custody
APPENDIX D
Calibration Certificates
APPENDIX E
Laboratory Results
APPENDIX F
Water Corporation Information
APPENDIX G
Jandakot Water Treatment Plant – Safety Data Sheets
APPENDIX H
Department of Health Fact Sheet
APPENDIX I
Limitations
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 5
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
There have been four reported cases of kidney (renal) cancer amongst the firefighters stationed at the
Department of Fire and Emergency Services (DFES) Success Fire Station, 365 Hammond Road Success
(the site), up to 21 November 2014. DFES has initiated a number of investigations into this matter to identify
if there is an identifiable cause and what control measures can be implemented to prevent further
occurrences.
DFES has reported the current known common elements across all four cases of kidney cancer are:
DFES has sought to identify if there is a link between the site, and the incidents of kidney cancer. The site
was opened in 2000 and was staffed until 31 October 2014 when the firefighters were temporarily relocated
during the course of investigations.
On 14 October 2014 Golder was engaged by DFES to undertake an environmental investigation to assess if
there was evidence that contaminants present at the site and immediate surrounds could be associated with
the development of the cancers. Golder proposed an approach based on assessing the site history and
judgemental sampling to identify if there is a plausible link from the site to the diagnoses of cancer. Golder
has been advised by DFES of concurrent investigations including a biological monitoring program of the
Success firefighters and other firefighters who have previously worked at the station and an independent
epidemiological study initiated by the Department of Health (DoH) in Western Australia.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 6
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
A Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) in general accordance with the Department of Environment
Regulation (DER) Contaminated Sites Management Series.
Judgemental sampling which included the development of a list of chemicals of interest (COI) from
substances known to be associated with the development of kidney cancer for the targeted screening
sampling and the sampling and analysis of site media (soil, water and air) for those COI.
Comparison of the COI sample results against health investigation levels or environmental values.
The list of COI was also informed by concerns raised by the firefighters during a site visit on the
18 October 2014 and a meeting held at the site on 31 October 2014 and also from concerns raised by the
firefighters and passed onto Golder by DFES representatives.
We have presented the Source – Pathway – Receptor model in the form of a conceptual site model (CSM) to
help communicate the interpretation of the results. The CSM is presented in Figure 1 below and provides
the potential sources, pathways and the sampling approach.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 7
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
Inhalation
Off-site surface water Stormwater drain Surface water
sampling in drain
Direct Contact
Ingestion
Tap water
Drinking water Tap water at the site sampling
Direct Contact
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 8
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
Historical aerial photograph review and review of current planning and zoning information
Assessment of current and historical activities on the site and surrounding areas which have the
potential to result in contamination consistent with the identified COI
Site walkover
The site’s western boundary abuts land zoned as ‘other regional roads’ (Hammond Road). West is zoned
residential and to the east of the site is a recreational area then residential zoning which is bordered to the
east by land zoned primary regional roads (Kwinana Freeway).
A 10 ha wedge of land to the north-east of the reserve contains the Water Corporation Jandakot Water
Treatment Plant. A 200 m chlorine buffer surrounds this facility which borders the north-eastern corner of
Reserve No. 7756. The chlorine buffer is a requirement of the Environmental Protection Authority and
Department of Mines and Petroleum to safeguard neighbouring properties from the impact of chlorine
release events. When these events occur they are one-off short-term events. There have been no such
events at the water treatment plant since its commissioning. Residential development is prohibited within the
buffer. The water treatment plant is located on Reserve 35271 on the southern side of Bartram Road.
Previously a 300 m chlorine buffer applied to the water treatment plant; however, this was reduced to 200 m
in September 2004 following the upgrading of the plant.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 9
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
The DER Contaminated Sites Database provides an online publicly accessible database that shows sites
classified as “Contaminated – Remediation Required”, “Contaminated – Restricted Use” or “Remediated for
restricted use”.
There are remediated contaminated sites in the surrounding suburbs that are registered in the database.
Table 2 provides a summary of these sites with respect to the site:
Table 2: Contaminated Sites Summary
Distance and
Classification Previous Use Current Use
Direction
Remediated – Restricted Use (2007) 1.5 km SE Piggery Residential
Wool scouring and waste Commercial/Industrial
Remediated – Restricted Use (2009) 3.4 km N
water treatment Premises
Remediated – Restricted Use (2013) 4.2 km NNE Service Station Commercial
These sites listed on the register are not considered to present a source of chemicals of interest due to the
distance from the site, groundwater flow direction or the nature of the contaminants on which the
classification is based. Appendix A, Figure F00D shows the proximity of these sites relative to the fire
station.
No items of environmental significance were identified within the site boundary or within the immediate
vicinity of the site.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 10
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
None of the industries, activities and land uses presented in the Contaminated Sites Management Series,
Potentially Contaminating Activities, Activities and Landuses, October 2004 were identified to have occurred
or been undertaken on the site (i.e. remnant vegetation and vehicle tracks) prior to its construction as a fire
station in 2000. The 2002 aerial photograph shows the Success Career Fire and Rescue Station building
and grounds.
3.4 Groundwater
The Department of Water (DOW) Perth Groundwater Atlas provides groundwater contours for the
Perth Metropolitan region and covers the site. Based on the contour maps, there is an east to west or
west south-west flow of groundwater at the site. Groundwater contours and flow are indicated on
Appendix A, Figure F00O.
Accordingly, groundwater impacts from registered contaminated sites to the north or south of the site are
unlikely to impact on groundwater quality at the site.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 11
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
The land to the north has been used as a water treatment plant since prior to 1981. In the 1981 aerial
photograph, the evaporation ponds that form part of the treatment plant are present and the rust colour
indicates the plant is in use. The water treatment plant was established sometime during 1979 as the
evaporation ponds are not present in the 1974 photograph. There is a noticeable increase in vegetation
surrounding the plant since 1981. The water treatment plant has been in operation since it was
commissioned.
The recreational facilities to the east of the site were developed in 2009/2010 with the official opening in
April 2010. The configuration is shown in the 2010 aerial photograph. Prior to this development the site was
surrounded by undeveloped land with natural remnant vegetation.
The surface drainage line to the north of the site along the southern boundary of the Water Corporation
facility is evident since 1965 and has retained the same alignment.
Spray drift may have occurred during the application of pesticides and this may provide a theoretical source
of contaminants, although not the COI. The year 1995 aerial photograph shows a series of buildings along
the western side of Hammond Road between the market garden and the future site. The planted area is
approximately 100 m from the site as shown in Appendix A, Figure F00K. The market gardens are located
down gradient of the site for both stormwater and groundwater; therefore not considered a potential source
for contamination of surface water or groundwater at the site.
Unknown wastes are not considered to be a significant risk for soil contamination. Based on site
observations and aerial photography the site was largely undisturbed until the construction of the fire station.
An unformed access track or fire break is evident in 1981 in the northern part of the site (running east to
west). This is more distinct in the 1995 aerial photograph. There is also no evidence of stockpiled materials
on or near the site that could be a source of soil contamination.
The site is located at 365 Hammond Road, Success. The station building has a sealed car park on its
southern boundary, Hammond Road on the west boundary, a stormwater drain along the northern
boundary and netball courts along the eastern boundary. There is a sealed parking area surrounding
the majority of the building with a small grassed section and landscaped garden along fence lines.
The building was constructed in 1999/2000 and is of conventional building materials of that time.
The building has a concrete slab, brick walls and metal roof and is reflective of typical residential
construction with the exception of the large appliance room on the southern side of the building.
There have been no structural changes or additions since the original construction.
There were no asbestos materials used in the construction of the building and a review of the building
specifications and visual inspection confirmed the absence of asbestos in construction materials.
There is a small garden shed at the rear of the appliance room and a steel shade structure has been
built along the northern side of the building for car parking.
The water supply to the station is mains supply only. No groundwater is used at the site.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 12
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
There is an on-site Ecomax effluent disposal system installed on the southern side of the property.
The infiltration area for this system is unsealed and there is a mesh fence delineating this area from the
remainder of the property.
The surface water drain along the northern boundary of the property flows east to west and provides
drainage for the surrounding area of the suburb.
1
There are two cathodic protection posts, one on the property in the south-west corner and one in the
drainage reserve to the north-west. Both are installed adjacent to Hammond Road.
The facility has been used as a fire station since opening in the year 2000.
The parking area at the rear of the property (north-eastern portion) has been used for training purposes.
Various foams (prior to 2004, B Class foam was aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) and post 2004
Mercury Fire, Mercury B Class Sabo foams) have been used for training exercises at the site. We
understand that the foams listed are typical of the foams used by DFES and industry for firefighting.
The surrounding land uses at the time of the site visit were observed as predominantly residential and
recreational (netball courts, oval and pavilion). Other than the Jandakot Water Treatment Plant to the
north-east, no industrial or commercial premises were located within close proximity (1 km) of the site.
The use of the building at the site can be described as residential with limited maintenance activities of
vehicles and equipment undertaken.
The building has four dormitory rooms (three twin rooms and a single) with shared ensuites. There is a
domestic style kitchen and meals area, office, study, and exercise and recreation rooms. The hose
room, tunic room and breathing apparatus service room are separated from the living area by the
appliance room.
The land use around the site has had some changes over the years. The water treatment plant was
constructed around 1980 and the agricultural (market garden) use on neighbouring properties over
Hammond Road to the west has transitioned to residential use in the last 10 years. A recreational facility
was developed to the east of the site in 2009/2010.
The reserve to the north of the site is used for the Water Corporation’s water treatment plant. This plant
treats groundwater abstracted from several aquifers in the area for drinking water. The plant has been in
operation since the 1980s. The recreational facility that abuts the fire station to the east and car park to the
south was developed in 2009/2010 with the official opening in April 2010. Prior to this development the site
was surrounded by undeveloped land with natural remnant vegetation.
Based on the information in the contaminated sites database, the site history review and surrounding land
use, it is considered that there is no evidence that the site was contaminated under the Contaminated Sites
Act.
Accordingly, soil contamination and/or groundwater contamination from previous or surrounding landuse is
not considered a source for the cancer incidents.
1 is a technique used to control the corrosion of a metal surface by making it the cathode of an electrochemical cell
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 13
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
A source can be described as a hazard or the presence of a hazard in an environmental medium that has
the potential to cause harm. An understanding of the concentration and properties of the source allow for
assessment of risk.
There needs to be a pathway, or pathways, that connect the receptor with the source. At conceptual level
there are three pathways to be considered in environmental exposure:
2) Ingestion – eating and drinking, hand to mouth transfer, incidental swallowing and exposure via the
gastrointestinal system.
3) Dermal contact – direct skin contact with the contaminant and absorption through the skin.
Once the source is known and the exposure pathways identified, the last element of the risk model is the
receptor. This refers to the people, animals or plants that could be affected by the source and the common
opportunities for exposure according to time and place. If all elements (source-pathway-receptor) are
present, there is a risk. The level of risk needs to be evaluated with consideration of the properties of the
COI and the exposure parameters (duration, frequency and magnitude).
The focus of this investigation is to identify if there are any contaminant sources at the site which have been
identified by regulatory authorities’ (ATSDR, National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC]) as
being associated with the development of renal cancer.
Air – direct and indirect emissions of gases, vapours, dust and particulates to the atmosphere.
Emissions of volatile contaminants from soil and groundwater.
Surface water – including direct releases of contaminants to surface water or indirect, such as leaching
or surface runoff from impacted soil into drainage lines.
The identification and consideration of contaminant transport mechanisms has been included in the
exposure pathway assessment.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 14
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
It is understood that the property has a reticulated mains water supply and no groundwater is used at the
site. The site is not located near a source of gas or vapour emissions to air, noting that the property was
located outside of the chlorine buffer zone for the Water Corporation’s water treatment plant.
Based on the infrastructure present and use of the property, there are a number of plausible pathways,
should a contaminant source be present. Table 4 presents the preliminary pathway assessment based on
the assumption that an environmental contaminant source is present.
Table 4: Preliminary Exposure Pathway Assessment
Identified Exposure Pathways
Inhalation of vapours or gases from contaminated groundwater
Inhalation of vapours or gases from contaminated surface water
Inhalation of contaminated dusts
Inhalation of gases or vapours incidentally introduced into the building by personnel*
Ingestion of contaminated water
Ingestion of contaminated food from the garden from soil contamination
Absorption from contact with contaminated soil (garden)
*This indirect pathway related to off-site attendance at an incident by DFES personnel has been included due to the description of the
post incident decontamination processes described by the firefighters and potential for introduction of contaminants into these areas on
their clothing.
The approach to investigating if a contaminant source is present at the site is outlined in Section 5.0.
A discussion on the nearby water treatment plant is provided in Section 6.7.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 15
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
Through the consultation process, station personnel requested that the investigation also consider the
following compounds:
Chlorine
Iron sulphide
Glyphosate
2, 4-D
Asbestos
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 16
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
Chlorine and iron sulphide were considered in the investigation. These two chemicals have not been
identified by regulatory authorities as being associated with the development of kidney cancer (NHMRC,
2011).
Glyphosate, 2, 4-D (which were common agricultural chemicals) and asbestos were amongst the COI
considered in the development of the screening sampling. Review of the management of these chemicals in
Australia (enHealth, 2005; NHMRC, 2011) confirmed that these are not currently substances recognised as
being either carcinogens (glyphosate and 2, 4-D) or associated with the development of kidney cancer
2
(asbestos ). Benzidines and aromatic amines (1,2-diphenylhydrazine, 4,4'-methylenebis(2-
chloroaniline)(MBOCA), 4,4'-methylenedianiline, atrazine, benzidine, pyridine) were also considered but, with
the exception of benzidine, they were not identified as being associated with the development of kidney
cancer. Benzidine is associated with the dye industry and not considered likely to be present on site given
the history and current use.
Dedicated equipment was used at each sampling location (disposable gloves and hand auger) coupled
with stringent field decontamination procedures to minimise the risk of cross contamination (where
applicable).
Samples were collected in laboratory-provided sample containers with the appropriate preservatives
where required.
The swab samples were collected using GhostWipes. Swab wipes were 15 cm × 15 cm wipes
pre-moistened with deionised water and packaged in individually sealed packets. Swabbed areas
2 2
ranged from 100 cm to 400 cm . The swabs were placed in laboratory supplied polyethylene
centrifuge tubes for transport to the analytical laboratory.
Samples were labelled and stored on ice for transport to a laboratory for analyses.
Samples were transported under COC to NMI in Perth, a National Association of Testing Authorities
(NATA) accredited laboratory, for analyses.
2 Quoted from enHealth 2005: “Evidence does not exist for non-cancer effects outside the respiratory system, other than some suggestion of immunotoxic effects (ATSDR, 2001).
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 1987) and the World Health Organization (WHO, 1986) concluded that the information for development of other health
effects, such as gastrointestinal cancer from inhalation or ingestion of fibres, is inconsistent and inconclusive. More recently the United States Department of Health and Human
Services (DHHS) declared ‘an increased risk of gastrointestinal cancer to be an effect of concern’ (ATSDR, 2001).
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 17
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
The vacuum cleaners were also screened with a PID although it was unlikely that VOC would be retained in
the vacuum cleaners because of the volatile nature of the compounds, that is, the compounds being targeted
in the screening sampling dissipate quickly on release to the atmosphere. This means that current
measurements do not necessarily reflect concentrations in the past unless there were to be an ongoing
source and release of VOC in or around the site.
Sampling of groundwater was undertaken to assess whether or not VOC, i.e. TCE, PCE and brominated
solvents specifically, were detectable in groundwater and could be a source of exposure to firefighters at the
site. VOC were the main COI targeted for groundwater as the site does not use bore water and therefore
direct contact with groundwater at the site is improbable.
Analytes for the groundwater samples were a metals suite (including cadmium and arsenic), VOC (including
brominated solvents), potassium bromate and phosphate (to assess the presence of potassium ester flame
retardants).
Golder attended the site on 5 November 2014 to collect the samples. The water was under high pressure.
Groundwater samples submitted to the laboratory were analysed for the following:
Trihalomethanes
Metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium (total), copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, sulfur and zinc)
The surface water samples were submitted to the laboratory and analysed for the same COI as listed in
Section 5.2.2 above.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 18
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
The tap water sample was submitted to the laboratory and was analysed for the following:
Metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium (total), copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, sulfur and zinc)
Chlorine
pH.
The areas were swabbed with the same swab two to three times in different directions and the area used to
collect the sample recorded. Swab samples submitted to the laboratory were analysed for the following:
Metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium (total), copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, sulfur and zinc), and
Phosphate.
5.2.5.2 Soil
Soil samples were targeted to areas that are routinely accessed by the firefighters on site. The PSI site
walkover and interviews indicated minimal interaction with soil at the site. It is understood by Golder
(pers. comm. Ben Darcy via telephone 4 November 2014) that there was a vegetable patch on site. Due to
the likely handling of soil and potential for uptake into vegetables this was the focus of the soil sampling. Soil
samples were collected at two locations (fruit tree and vegetable patch), with a surface and approximately
20 cm deep sample collected at each location. An additional surface soil sample was taken on the perimeter
fence area due to anecdotal reports of sludge disposal in this area. The soils were analysed for metals and
total phosphate (total phosphate was used as an indicator for PEFR).
Soil samples submitted to the laboratory were analysed for one or more of the following:
Metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium (total), copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, sulfur and zinc
Total phosphate.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 19
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
6.0 RESULTS
6.1 Interpretation of Laboratory Results
As described previously, the samples collected during this investigation were sent to a NATA accredited
laboratory for analysis. The laboratory provides the analytical result together with the limit of reporting
(LOR). The detection of a compound or substance does not automatically mean there is a risk.
To understand the results they need to be assessed against known or established values or trigger levels (if
available and applicable) or in some cases considered via an exposure calculation or study.
The following sections provide the results and interpretation for the sampling undertaken.
No VOCs were identified in the groundwater and no COIs were identified in the groundwater. The majority of
the analytes were below the laboratory LOR and the pH of the groundwater was within normal ranges.
Total phosphate has been used as surrogate for PEFR due to lack of availability in Australia to test for the
particular compounds. Phosphate has been detected which is normal for surface and groundwater. The
Australian Freshwater and Marine Guidelines (ANZECC & ARMCANZ, 2000) have trigger values for South
West Australia for total phosphorus for surface water bodies that range (depending on water body type) from
0.010 to 0.065 mg/L (ANZECC & ARMCANZ, 2000 pg 3.3-14). These values are very conservative and
typically their application to groundwater would allow consideration of higher tolerable concentration due to
dilution when received in the surface water body (i.e. 10 times). The stormwater recorded the highest
concentration which is not surprising given the stagnant nature of the drain and the collection of runoff water.
The concentrations detected are therefore considered consistent with typical natural levels and therefore it is
not considered likely that these represent the presence of PEFR at the site.
Hexachlorobutadiene and vinyl chloride were not detected with a LOR of 0.001 mg/L; the National
Environmental Protection Measure (NEPM) groundwater investigation levels (GIL) for use as drinking water
are 0.0007 mg/L and 0.0004 mg/L respectively. Whilst there is potential for the GIL to be exceeded there is
no exposure pathway for firefighters to be exposed from groundwater at the site, accordingly further analysis
to assess if these compounds are present above guideline levels but below the analytical LOR applicable to
this test work is not warranted.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 20
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
Arsenic was detected in four of the seven samples relating to the outer windows and dorm room 2 and 3
windows. The concentration of arsenic in one sample marginally exceeded the reference value (10%). This
is not a significant exceedance given the conservatism in the surface exposure estimates. Nevertheless,
Golder has quantified the estimated daily exposure and compared the result with the WHO tolerable daily
intake for arsenic of 2.1 µg/kg/d.
Estimated daily intake (EDI) equals the concentration of arsenic on swab adjusted for a surface area of
2
100 cm
The amount arsenic on the swabs is internalised and distributed throughout the body
Consequently, the EDI is given by 0.427 µg/d (total DI) ÷ 85 kg (body weight) = 0.05 µg/kg/d (rounded up),
which is 2.4% of the TDI. This confirms that arsenic concentrations in surface dust are not a cause for
concern.
3 World Trade Center Indoor Air Task Force Working Group (2003). World Trade Center Indoor Environment Assessment: Selecting Contaminants of Potential Concern and Setting
Health-Based Benchmarks. Available at: World Trade Center Indoor Environment Assessment: Selecting Contaminants of Potential Concern and Setting Health-Based Benchmarks
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 21
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
Appendix E2, Table B also provides the TDI calculations for the other metals included in the laboratory
analysis suite. These are not COI and the levels TDI calculations confirm that the concentrations in surface
dust are not a cause for concern.
6.5 Soil
The soil sampling results are presented in Appendix E3, Table C. The sampling locations are presented in
Appendix A, Figure F00Q. All results were below NEPM health investigation levels (HIL).
The US EPA has derived a provisional health advisory level of 0.0004 mg/L for PFOA and the sample result
from the stormwater systems was 0.00035 mg/L. This concentration was below the health advisory by
US EPA. This and the fact that it is in stormwater, there is no complete pathway for firefighters to be
exposed.
Currently, there are limited experimental studies for the carcinogenic properties of this class of substances.
It is clear however from the animal toxicity dataset for Perflourooctane sulfonate (PFOS) that a high enough
dose of both PFOS and PFOA can result in liver, thyroid, and mammary tumours. PFOS and PFOA are not
genotoxic and the tumours observed occur at doses that are damaging to the liver and bile systems of the
experimental animals. The tolerable daily intakes that have been set for PFOS/PFOA are therefore
protective of the carcinogenic effects of PFOS/PFOA. These compounds bind to plasma and thus can be
detected using serum at low concentrations many years after exposure. Biological assessment is the most
accurate method to evaluate adverse health effects.
The source of the PFOA and other compounds detected in the stormwater drain cannot be established from
the single sample taken. The identification of where the detected compounds originated will not alter the fact
that there is not a complete exposure pathway.
The uncertainty of chemicals used in the water treatment plant and the treatment process together with
the proximity to the fire station and potential for atmospheric contaminants impacting the site.
Why the buffer distance at the water treatment plant was changed from 300 m to 200 m.
The uncertainty as to the supply configuration and the fire station being the first or last property in the
supply line directly from the water treatment plant and potential impacts on the quality of the water.
The potential for contaminants in the sediment pond materials that have been used as fire breaks on
the Water Corporation site and potential for that dust to contain contaminants and impact the site.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 22
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
Conjecture or uncertainty as to whether the failure of the hot water recirculation pipework in the building
in 2012 could be a link to the cancer incidents.
Aluminium sulfate is used as a coagulant to assist in the water clarifying process and polyelectrolyte is used
as a flocculant. These products are added to the clarifier stage to aggregate suspended particulates in the
water and facilitate their removal by physical means with the materials transferred to the evaporation ponds.
Neither product is known to cause cancer.
From the clarifier the water is filtered and then fluoride, chlorine and caustic soda are added in line to control
pH and provide disinfection. Water quality parameters are checked and treated water contained in a sealed
storage tank and then pumped to the Lake Thompson Reservoir.
The chlorine dosing system is contained within a dedicated control building, is process controlled and
automated shutoff devices are in place. The other chemicals are contained within dedicated tanks within
concrete secondary containment.
There was a 300 m buffer zone around the clarifier for odour, the odour related to hydrogen sulfide, a
naturally occurring compound in the groundwater. Hydrogen sulfide gas has a distinct pungent odour that
was released to the atmosphere through the aeration treatment process. The treatment process was
upgraded in 2004 and this aspect of treatment ceased, the buffer was therefore reduced to 200 m. The
200 m buffer relates to the chlorine dosing facility and is a requirement of the Environmental Protection
Authority and Department of Mines and Petroleum to safeguard neighbouring properties from the impact of
chlorine release events.
Copies of the Safety Data Sheets for the products used in the water treatment plant process are supplied in
Appendix G.
Between 2004 and 2008 the sediment was used once a year to line the internal firebreaks at the water
treatment plant. During 2009 sediment was not removed and in 2010 to 2013 sediment was removed and
delivered to a class 1 landfill. The use of this material is yet to be decided for 2014.
Sediment sampling conducted for the period 2004 to 2008 (corresponding to use of the material on fire
breaks within the vicinity of the fire station) included the COI of cadmium. Levels were below NEPM HIL A.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 23
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
The water quality monitoring regime includes assessment of water treatment by-products for the type of
disinfection system used. The by-product sampling regime includes regular sampling of total
trihalomethanes (THM) for the requested period (sampled monthly) and periodic sampling of haloacetic acids
(HAA). The Water Corporation has monitored these parameters along with microbiological, chemical,
radiological and fluoride to determine performance in meeting drinking water quality criteria.
The Water Corporation sampling results were well below the ADWG health guideline value THM during the
period in question. Similarly the results for HAA were well below the World Health Organisation guideline
value; there is no current value for HAA provided in the ADWG.
The Department of Health fact sheet “Copper in Drinking Water” is provided in Appendix H and provides
further information on copper in drinking water.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 24
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
7.0 DISCUSSION
The purpose of this investigation was to identify if there was a unique situation at the site that could be a
cause for the cancer incidents. The investigation aimed to identify is there were sources of chemicals known
to cause kidney cancer at the site and assess if there was a complete pathway and hence potential for
exposure. To meet the aim of the investigation judgemental sampling was undertaken based on the
development of the conceptual site model with the intent of identifying if there was a “source” that would
have a plausible “pathway” to the firefighters (“receptors”). As described in this report, the results of the PSI
and judgemental sampling conducted at the site have not identified an exposure risk that is consistent with
the development of kidney (renal) cancer.
While PFOA was detected in the stormwater drain on the north of the site there is not a complete pathway
for firefighters to be exposed to PFOA present in the stormwater. Further, the level detected within the
stormwater is below the guideline values to be protective of health in drinking water. The source of the
PFOA detected in the stormwater drain cannot be established from the single sample taken. The
identification of where the detected compound originated will not alter the fact that there is not a complete
exposure pathway and therefore does not present a risk to firefighter health.
In relation to groundwater, no COI or VOCs were detected in the sampling. The groundwater wells were
located upgradient of the site and results of sample analyses indicate there is not an ongoing source of
groundwater contamination. There is also no complete pathway from groundwater.
The screening for VOCs was conducted throughout the building on the day that other samples were taken
and VOCs were not identified as being present. The results are considered representative of site conditions
due to the absence of VOCs in other media such as ground water.
Whilst the COI arsenic was identified in the soil samples, it was well below published health investigation
levels and the interaction with soil at the site is limited to infrequent maintenance of a vegetable garden and
general garden maintenance. Accordingly there is no cause for concern from this source.
Swab sampling detected COI arsenic and cadmium on surfaces at the station. The results for arsenic and
cadmium were compared to screening values developed for the World Trade Center and to WHO toxicity
reference values in the form of a TDI. The level of cadmium detected was below screening levels. Arsenic
was detected in four of the seven samples relating to the outer windows and dorm room 2 and 3 windows.
The concentration of arsenic in one sample marginally exceeded the reference value (10%). An exposure
calculation was completed to compare to WHO TDI levels and the level is equivalent to 2.4% of the TDI.
Accordingly the levels are not a cause for concern for the fire fighters health.
A number of concerns were raised by firefighters and the UFU of WA relating to water quality and the
proximity of the Water Corporation’s water treatment plant. The fire station is located outside of the initial
odour buffer zone of 300 m and the current buffer zone of 200 m and the products used at the Water
Corporation’s facility and the sediment materials do not have a link with the development of kidney cancer.
The Water Corporation has a comprehensive testing regimen that addresses microbiological, chemical
(including fluoride) and radiological testing to monitor performance in meeting drinking water quality criteria.
The regimen includes assessment of water treatment by-products the concentration of which were well
below the ADWG health guideline value e.g. trihalomethane (THM), during the period in question. Similarly
the results for haloacetic acids (HAA) were well below WHO guideline, values (note: there is no current value
for HAA provided in the ADWG). Accordingly, the scheme supply of water to site and activities at the water
treatment plant are not considered a source.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 25
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
Inhalation
Groundwater beneath
the site
Groundwater Direct Contact
Groundwater Inhalation
upgradient of the site
and at the site Direct Contact
Inhalation
Off-site surface water Stormwater drain
Direct Contact
Ingestion
Drinking water Tap water at the site
Direct Contact
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 26
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
8.0 CONCLUSION
The scope of the investigation was to assess whether there was an identifiable link between the environment
at site and the incidents of kidney cancer. The COI included chemicals known to cause renal cancer based
on animal studies and epidemiological studies in humans. The majority of the COI identified as plausible
causative agents of kidney cancer in the firefighters, in various environmental media at or near the site, were
not detected. The COIs cadmium, arsenic and PFOA were detected and the concentrations were sufficiently
low as to not be a concern for health of the firefighters. There was not a complete pathway for exposure of
firefighters to PFOA present in the stormwater drain. Accordingly, there is no identified link between the site
and the incidents of kidney cancer experienced.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 27
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
9.0 LIMITATIONS
Your attention is drawn to the document “Limitations”, which is included as Appendix I to this report. This
document is intended to assist you in ensuring that your expectations of this report are realistic, and that you
understand the inherent limitations of a report of this nature. If you are uncertain as to whether this report is
appropriate for any particular purpose please discuss this issue with us.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 28
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
REFERENCES
Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand and the Australian and New
Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ARMCANZ & ANZECC), 2000, Australian and New
Zealand Guidelines for fresh and marine water quality: Volume 1.
ATSDR, 2005. Toxic Substances Portal - Bromoform & Dibromochloromethane. Available at:
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=713&tid=128 Accessed 21 October 2014.
ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), 2011. Toxic Substances Portal: Renal
(Urinary System or Kidneys). Available at:
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/substances/toxorganlisting.asp?sysid=20. Accessed 21 October 2014.
ATSDR, 2012b: Toxic Substances Portal : Toxicological Profile for Phosphate Ester Flame Retardants.
Available at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=1119&tid=239. Accessed 4 November 2014 Last
updated March 2011. Accessed 21 October 2014.
Department of Environment Regulation, Contaminated Sites Database. Accessed October 2014 at:
https://secure.dec.wa.gov.au/idelve/css/
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australian Drinking Water Guidelines 6, 2011
(Version 3.0 Updated December 2014), Commonwealth of Australia. [Accessed 23 December 2014].
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to
Humans, Chlorinated Drinking-water; Chlorination By-products; Some Other Halogenated Compounds;
Cobalt and Cobalt Compounds. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; Vol.
52. 1991, Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Basic Information about Disinfection Byproducts in
Drinking Water: Total Trihalomethanes, Haloacetic Acids, Bromate and Chlorite. 13 December 2013;
Accessed 25 November 2014.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Provisional Health Advisories for Perfluorooctanoic
Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), 8 January 2009. Accessed 15 December 2014.
US EPA, 1992. Integrated Risk Information System: Cadmium (CASRN 7440-43-9). Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0141.htm. Accessed 21 October 2014.
US EPA, 1998. Integrated Risk Information System: Arsenic, inorganic (CASRN 7440-38-2). Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0278.htm. Accessed 4 November 2014.
US EPA, 2001. Integrated Risk Information System: Bromate (CASRN 15541-45-4). Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/1002.htm. Accessed 21 October 2014.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 29
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
US EPA, 2005. Draft risk assessment of the potential human health effects associated with exposure to
Perfluorooctanoic acid and its salts. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/pfoa/pubs/pfoarisk.pdf.
Accessed 4 November 2014.
US EPA, 2011. Integrated Risk Information System: Trichloroethylene (CASRN 79-01-6). Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0199.htm. Accessed 21 October 2014.
US EPA, 2012. Integrated Risk Information System: Tetrachloroethylene (CASRN: 127-18-4). Available at:
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0106.htm. Accessed 21 October 2014.
WHO (various dates) – Evaluations of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Accessed
1 December 2014 at http://apps.who.int/food-additives-contaminants-jecfa-database/search.aspx
World Trade Center Indoor Air Task Force Working Group (2003). World Trade Center Indoor Environment
Assessment: Selecting Contaminants of Potential Concern and Setting Health-Based Benchmarks.
Available at: World Trade Center Indoor Environment Assessment: Selecting Contaminants of Potential
Concern and Setting Health-Based Benchmarks
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 30
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
MW/SAM/PDM/eh
Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation.
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 31
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
APPENDIX A
Figures
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
390000 391000 392000 393000
KEY MAP
WANNEROO
MIDLAND
6444000
6444000
PERTH
FREMANTLE
APPROXIMATE
VIEW EXTENT
ARMADALE
BYFORD
KWINANA
ROCKINGHAM
0 5 10 JARRAHDALE
SERPENTINE
Kilometres
6443000
6443000
!
(
6442000
6442000
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A4
6441000
6441000
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00A-Rev1.mxd
NOTES
1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50
LEGEND
(
! SITE LOCATION
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 m
1:20,000
CLIENT PROJECT
DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SUCCESS FIRE STATION
25mm
PREPARED
LOCATION PLAN
MS
DESIGN
ANTINA WAY
CORREA PAS
6442600
6442600
S
TURN
WARRU GDNS DAVIESIA
WAY
MAL A
HAMMOND RD
SUTTOR DR
KUNDIP LANE
E: 391232.914 E: 391292.972
N: 6442409.493 !
5 N: 6442404.289
DARWINIA RD
!4 !3
6442400
6442400
E: 391238.991
FRANKENIA TURN N: 6442403.577
BREMER WAY
VELVET LANE
MA NBY BEND
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00B-Rev1.mxd
R
NO
WILLE R IN
LO
STARBUSH GDNS
OP
DRAFT
25mm
CADASTRE BOUNDARY LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS LANDGATE (2014)
0
391000 391500 392000 392500 393000 393500
6443000
6443000
6442500
6442500
APPROXIMATE
SITE BOUNDARY
6442000
6442000
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00C-Rev1.mxd
6441500
6441500
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAFT
REFERENCE NOTES
CLIENT PROJECT
SITE LAYOUT PROVIDED BY CLIENT. 1. COORDINATE SYSTEM: GDA 1994 MGA ZONE 50
DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PRELIMINARY WORKPLACE CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION -
SUCCESS FIRE STATION
25mm
CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
PREPARED JRP CITY OF COCKBURN
0 100 200 300 400 500 m DESIGN
TOWN PLANNING SCHEME NO. 3 (DISTRICT SCHEME)
0
386000 388000 390000 392000 394000 396000
SOUTH
LAKE
Stock Rd
No
rt h
La
ke
Rd
6446000
6446000
JANDAKOT
YANGEBUP
No
rt h
La
ke
Rd
Rd
COCKBURN
k
oc
St
CENTRAL
Kw
ina
n
aF
wy
Ar
m ad
r Dr ale
Be e lia Rd
Arm
a d ale
Rd
6444000
6444000
BANJUP
ATWELL
BEELIAR
APPROXIMATE
Russell Rd
SITE BOUNDARY
wy
na F
SUCCESS
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
a
Kwin
6442000
6442000
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00D-Rev1.mxd
Ro
cki
ng
ha m
Rd
Rock ing ha m
Rd
HENDERSON
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAFT
WATTLEUP
25mm
CADASTRE BOUNDARY
CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
CONTAMINATED SITES
PREPARED JRP SITE PLAN - CONTAMINATED SITES
0 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 m DESIGN
0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
6442600
6442600
6442500
6442500
6442400
6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00E-Rev1.mxd
6442300
6442300
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAFT
6442200
6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
25mm
REFERENCE
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS 1953 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN
0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
6442600
6442600
6442500
6442500
6442400
6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00F-Rev1.mxd
6442300
6442300
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
6442200
6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
25mm
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
1965 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN
0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
6442600
6442600
6442500
6442500
6442400
6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00G-Rev 1.mxd
6442300
6442300
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
6442200
6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
25mm
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
1974 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN
0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
6442600
6442600
6442500
6442500
6442400
6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00H-Rev1.mxd
6442300
6442300
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
6442200
6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
25mm
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
1979 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN
0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
6442600
6442600
6442500
6442500
6442400
6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00I-Rev1.mx d
6442300
6442300
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAFT
6442200
6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
25mm
REFERENCE
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS 1981 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN
0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
6442600
6442600
6442500
6442500
6442400
6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00J-Rev1.mxd
6442300
6442300
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
6442200
6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
25mm
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
1985 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN
0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
6442600
6442600
6442500
6442500
6442400
6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00K-Rev1.mxd
6442300
6442300
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAFT
6442200
6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
25mm
REFERENCE
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS 1995 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN
0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
6442600
6442600
6442500
6442500
6442400
6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00L-Rev1.mxd
6442300
6442300
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
6442200
6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
25mm
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
2002 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN
0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
6442600
6442600
6442500
6442500
6442400
6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00M-Rev1.mxd
6442300
6442300
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAFT
6442200
6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
25mm
REFERENCE
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS 2006 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN
0
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
6442600
6442600
6442500
6442500
6442400
6442400
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00N-Rev1.mxd
6442300
6442300
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAFT
6442200
6442200
390900 391000 391100 391200 391300 391400 391500 391600
25mm
REFERENCE
AERIAL IMAGERY AND CADASTRE BOUNDARY © WESTERN CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
AUSTRALIAN LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS
LANDGATE (2014) PREPARED MS 2010 HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGERY
0 20 40 60 80 100 m DESIGN
0
390800 391000 391200 391400 391600
BARTRAM RD
20
19
6442800
6442800
21
ADMIN.
BULK CHEMICAL
STORAGE
300m CLARIFIER
DAVIESIA TURN
ANTINA WAY
m
200 GROUND WATE R FLOW
STORAGE TANK
CORREA PASS
6442600
6442600
DN S
WARRU G
HAMMOND RD
100m
WAY EVAPORATION
MAL A
PONDS
SUTTOR DR
E: 391232.148 E: 391292.126
PITTA CNR
N: 6442467.410 N: 6442468.204
!1 !2
18
KUNDIP LANE
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
FIR
EB
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00O-Rev 1.mxd
E: 391232.914 RE
DARWINIA RD
N: 6442409.493 ! AK
5
!3 E: 391292.972
6442400
6442400
!4 N: 6442404.289
E: 391238.991
FRANKENIA TURN N: 6442403.577
M
JACKSONIA PRO
300m
m
BREMER WAY
200
VELVET LANE
100
17
m
NORMANBY BEND
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAFT
390800 391000 391200 391400 391600
25mm
CADASTRE BOUNDARY LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS LANDGATE (2014)
0
SWAB SAMPLES
ON WINDOWS/FRAMES
!
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! !
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00P-Rev1.mxd
SWAB SAMPLES
VACUUMS
!
SHED
! ! ! !
25mm
! VOC SAMPLE NON DETECT
CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
0
391200 391250 391300 391350 391400 391450 391500 391550
6442550
6442550
6442500
6442500
STORMWATER
DRAIN
>
!
SURFACE SOIL
A
!
6442450
6442450
HAMMOND RD
IRRIGATION
BORE 2
IRRIGATION >
!
BORE 1
!A
A !
FRUIT TREE VEGETABLE PATCH
>
!
6442400
6442400
FRANKENIA TURN
IF THIS MEASUREMENT DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN, THE SHEET SIZE HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM: ISO A3
Path: G:\Spatial_Information_Group\GIS_WORKSPACE_AUSTRALIA\01_WA\M6164_SUCCESS\1413531\Projects\001-R\Rev1\1413531-001-R-F00Q-Rev 1.mxd
6442350
6442350
VELVET LANE
NORMANBY BEND
DRAFT
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
25mm
LAND INFORMATION AUTHORITY TRADING AS LANDGATE (2014)
A
! SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2015.02.03 TITLE
SITE BOUNDARY
PREPARED MS WATER AND SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS
CADASTRE BOUNDARY 0 10 20 30 40 50 m DESIGN
0
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over
Rear Sealed Area North East Corner Sealed Training Area and Tower
Northern Elevation. Facing West Towards Gate North Elevation Car Parking
February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 1/4
APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over
Lawn Area North Boundary and Soak Well Outdoor Cleaning Area
February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 2/4
APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over
February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 3/4
APPENDIX B
Site Walk Over
Garden Shed
j:\env\2014 - contam sites\1413531-dfes site investigation success\correspondence out\001-r - dfes psi\001 appendix b - site walk over\appendix b.docx
February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1 4/4
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
APPENDIX C
Chain of Custody
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
APPENDIX D
Calibration Certificates
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
1
2
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
APPENDIX E
Laboratory Results
E1a and E1b – Water Results
E2 – Swab Results
E3 – Soil Results
E4 – QA and QC
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
APPENDIX E
Laboratory Results
APPENDIX E1
Water Results
February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Table E1a: COI Water Media Results 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Chem_Group ChemName output unit EQL Health PHA US Aust Drinking Aust Drinking Water
Canada EPA 2009 Water 2011 2011 Health
2005 Aesthetic
Sample Quality Parameters pH (Lab) pH_Units 6.5-8.5 8.1 7.1 7.3 7.1
Total Phosphate (as P) (substitute for PFER) mg/L 0.005 - 0.21 0.09 0.079
Bromate mg/L 0.01 0.02 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Heavy Metals Arsenic mg/L 0.005 0.01 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Cadmium mg/L 0.002 0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Other Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) mg/L 0.00002 0.0004
† - 0.00035 <0.00002 <0.00002
Trihalomethanes Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Tribromomethane (Bromoform) mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Volatile Organic Compounds Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene) mg/L 0.001 0.005
‡ - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene) mg/L 0.001 0.05 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
J:\Env\2014 - Contam Sites\1413531-DFES Site Investigation Success\Correspondence Out\001-R - DFES PSI\001 Appendix E - Results and Laboratory Certificates\E1 - Water Results\ Created by: JG
Table E1a Water Results Rev01.xlsm Golder Associates Checked by:
Table E1b: Water Media Results 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Chem_Group ChemName output unit EQL Health PHA US Aust Drinking Water Aust Drinking Water
Canada EPA 2011 Aesthetic 2011 Health
Sample Quality Parameters pH (Lab) pH_Units 6.5-8.5 8.1 7.1 7.3 7.1
Potassium (Filtered) mg/L 1 - 3 8 5
Total Phosphate (as P) mg/L 0.005
Sulphur (as S) mg/L 0.1 - 5.3 0.68 7.3
Bromate mg/L 0.01 0.02 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
N-Et-FOSA mg/L 0.00005 - <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005
N-Et-FOSE mg/L 0.0005 - <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
N-Me-FOSA mg/L 0.0005 - <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
N-Me-FOSE mg/L 0.0005 - <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
PFDcS mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
PFHxS mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) mg/L 0.00005 - <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) mg/L 0.00002 - 0.001 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) mg/L 0.00002 - 0.0019 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorooctanesulfonamide (PFOSA) mg/L 0.00002 - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PFTeDA) mg/L 0.0005 - <0.0005 <0.0005 <0.0005
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) mg/L 0.00002 0.0002† - <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
Perfluorotridecanoic acid (PFTrDA) mg/L 0.00005 - <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005
Perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnA) mg/L 0.00005 - <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005
Halogenated Benzenes 1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.005 0.03 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.005 0.03 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.001 1.5 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.02 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.0003* 0.04 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
2-Chlorotoluene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
4-Chlorotoluene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Bromobenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Chlorobenzene mg/L 0.001 0.01 0.3 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Heavy Metals Arsenic mg/L 0.005 0.01 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Cadmium mg/L 0.002 0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Chromium mg/L 0.005 0.05 (hexavalent) <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Copper mg/L 0.005 1 2 0.19 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Iron mg/L 0.005 0.3 - 1.2 0.61 0.22
Lead mg/L 0.001 0.01 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 <0.001
Mercury mg/L 0.00005 0.001 <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005 <0.00005
Nickel mg/L 0.005 0.02 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005
Zinc mg/L 0.005 3 0.071 0.015 0.019 0.035
MAH 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Benzene mg/L 0.001 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Toluene mg/L 0.001 0.025 0.8 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Isopropylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
n-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
n-Propylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
p-Isopropyltoluene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
sec-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Styrene mg/L 0.001 0.004 0.03 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
tert-Butylbenzene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Ethylbenzene mg/L 0.001 0.003 0.3 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Xylenes (m & p) mg/L 0.002 0.02 0.06 - <0.002 <0.002 <0.002
Xylene (o) mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Other Chlorine mg/L 0.02 0.6 5 0.2 - - -
6:2 Fluorotelomer Sulfonate (6:2 FtS) mg/L 0.0001 - 0.0088 <0.0001 <0.0001
Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) mg/L 0.00002 0.0004† - 0.00035 <0.00002 <0.00002
PAH Naphthalene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Solvents Methyl Ethyl Ketone mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
2-Hexanone mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Methyl iso-butyl ketone mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Acetone mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Methyl-t-butyl ether mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Vinyl acetate mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Trihalomethanes Dibromochloromethane mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Dichlorobromomethane mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Tribromomethane mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Trichloromethane mg/L 0.001 0.25** <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Volatile Organic Compounds 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dibromoethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dichloroethane mg/L 0.001 0.003 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.001 0.03 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
trans-1,2-dichloroethene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,2-Dichloropropane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,3-Dichloropropane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
2,2-Dichloropropane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1,1-Dichloropropene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
trans-1,3-dichloropropene mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Bromochloromethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Bromodichloromethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Bromoform ug/L 1 - <1 <1 <1
Bromomethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Carbon disulfide mg/L 0.01 - <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Carbon tetrachloride mg/L 0.001 0.003 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Chlorodibromomethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Chloroethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Chloroform mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Chloromethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Dibromomethane ug/L 1 - <1 <1 <1
Dichloromethane mg/L 0.001 0.004 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Hexachlorobutadiene mg/L 0.001 0.0007 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Trichloroethene (Tricholoroethylene) mg/L 0.001 0.005
‡ - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Tetrachloroethene (Tetracholoroethylene) mg/L 0.001 0.05 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Trichlorofluoromethane mg/L 0.001 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Vinyl chloride mg/L 0.001 0.0003 - <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
J:\Env\2014 - Contam Sites\1413531-DFES Site Investigation Success\Correspondence Out\001-R - DFES PSI\001 Appendix E - Results and Laboratory Certificates\E1 - Water Results\ Created by: JG
Table E1b Water Results Rev01.xlsm Golder Associates Checked by:
Australian Government
____________________________________________
National Measurement Institute
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 1 of 2
Report No. RN1045296
Client : GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (WA) Job No. : GOLD55_W/141106
LEVEL 2 / 1 HAVELOCK STREET Quote No. : QT-02002
WEST PERTH WA 6005 Order No. :
Date Sampled : 5-NOV-2014
Date Received : 6-NOV-2014
Attention HELEN TANNER Sampled By : CLIENT
Project Name : 1413531
Your Client Services Manager : KOON-BAY HO Phone : (08) 9368 8400
20-NOV-2014
Unless notified to the contrary, the above samples will be disposed of one month from the reporting date.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 1 of 4
Report No. RN1045298
Client : GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (WA) Job No. : GOLD55_W/141106
LEVEL 2 / 1 HAVELOCK STREET Quote No. : QT-02002
WEST PERTH WA 6005 Order No. :
Date Sampled : 5-NOV-2014
Date Received : 6-NOV-2014
Attention HELEN TANNER Sampled By : CLIENT
Project Name : 1413531
Your Client Services Manager : KOON-BAY HO Phone : (08) 9368 8400
_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
20-NOV-2014
_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
20-NOV-2014
Unless notified to the contrary, the above samples will be disposed of one month from the reporting date.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
APPENDIX E2
Swab Results
February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Table E2: Swab Results 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Calculation equals (concentration per sample / area swabbed)*10 cm x 10 cm area / body weight
The following exposure factors (Enhealth Exposure Factor Guide) were used in the calculation of potential exposure
Body mass - Male 85 kg
NA = Not Available
* Sourced from NEPC (2013) TRV of 2 μg/kg/day used in derivation of soil Health Investigation Levels.
** Calculated from WHO (2013) PTMI of 25 μg/kg bw/month. Rounded up to nearest whole number
*** Sourced from WHO (1982) PMTDI of 500 μg/kg/d for copper; PMTDI of 0.3-1 mg/kg/d for zinc
^Calculated from WHO (2011b) PTWI of 0.025 mg/kg bw. This is a withdrawn reference value but is used for comparison in the absence of a current value.
^^Calculated from WHO (2011a) PTWI of 4 μg/kg bw per week
^^^Sourced from WHO (2011c) TDI of 12 μg/kg/d
J:\Env\2014 - Contam Sites\1413531-DFES Site Investigation Success\Correspondence Out\001-R - DFES PSI\001 Appendix E - Results and Laboratory Certificates\E2 - Swab Results\ Created by: JG
Table E2 Swab results.xlsm Golder Associates Checked by: MB
Australian Government
____________________________________________
National Measurement Institute
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 1 of 3
Report No. RN1044985
Client : GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (WA) Job No. : GOLD55_W/141106_2
LEVEL 2 / 1 HAVELOCK STREET Quote No. : QT-02002
WEST PERTH WA 6005 Order No. :
Date Sampled : 5-NOV-2014
Date Received : 6-NOV-2014
Attention HELEN TANNER Sampled By : CLIENT
Project Name : 1413531
Your Client Services Manager : KOON-BAY HO Phone : (08) 9368 8400
19-NOV-2014
19-NOV-2014
Unless notified to the contrary, the above samples will be disposed of one month from the reporting date.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
APPENDIX E3
Soil Results
February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Table E3: Soil Results 1413531-001-R-Rev1
J:\Env\2014 - Contam Sites\1413531-DFES Site Investigation Success\Correspondence Out\001-R - DFES PSI\001 Appendix E - Results and Laboratory Certificates\E3 - Soil Results\ Created by: JG
Table E3 Soil Results.xlsm Golder Associates Checked by: MB
Australian Government
____________________________________________
National Measurement Institute
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Page: 1 of 3
Report No. RN1044977
Client : GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (WA) Job No. : GOLD55_W/141106_1
LEVEL 2 / 1 HAVELOCK STREET Quote No. : QT-02002
WEST PERTH WA 6005 Order No. :
Date Sampled : 5-NOV-2014
Date Received : 6-NOV-2014
Attention HELEN TANNER Sampled By : CLIENT
Project Name : 1413531
Your Client Services Manager : KOON-BAY HO Phone : (08) 9368 8400
19-NOV-2014
19-NOV-2014
_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
_______________________________________________________________________________________
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
APPENDIX E4
Quality Assurance _ Quality Control
February 2015
Reference No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Table E4 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Soil and Swab Results
SampleCode GOLD55W1411061
Location N/A
Field_ID Q10629-04
Sampled_Date_Time 5/11/2014
Lab_Report_Number RN1044977
Lab_Name NMI
Sample_Type Field_B
Matrix_Description Soil
SampleCode W14/019477
Location N/A
Field_ID Q10629-05
Sampled_Date_Time 5/11/2014
Lab_Report_Number RN1044985
Lab_Name NMI
Sample_Type Field_B
Matrix_Description Surface Wipe
* Holding time from "Guidelines for the Collection and Preservation of Samples" NMI WA May 2009 and is calculated from the day the
sample was received at NMI.
Date: 20/11/2014
PO Box 1246 Bentley DC WA 6983 Tel:+61 8 9368 8400 Fax:+61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
National Measurement Institute
Australian Government
_______________________________
National Measurement Institute
Trace Elements
Arsenic 1.0 <1.0 ug/sample 17/11/2014 100 % 75 - 120
Cadmium 0.2 <0.2 ug/sample 17/11/2014 96 % 75 - 120
Chromium 1.0 <1.0 ug/sample 17/11/2014 105 % 75 - 120
Copper 1.0 <1.0 ug/sample 17/11/2014 99 % 75 - 120
Lead 0.2 <0.2 ug/sample 17/11/2014 103 % 75 - 120
Mercury 0.01 <0.01 ug/sample 17/11/2014 90 % 75 - 120
Nickel 1.0 <1.0 ug/sample 17/11/2014 100 % 75 - 120
Phosphorous 10 <10 ug/sample 17/11/2014 109 % 75 - 120
Zinc 1.0 <1.0 ug/sample 17/11/2014 102 % 75 - 120
* Holding time from "Guidelines for the Collection and Preservation of Samples" NMI WA May 2009 and is calculated from the day
the sample was received at NMI.
Date: 19/11/2014
PO Box 1246 Bentley DC WA 6983 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
National Measurement Institute
Australian Government
_______________________________
National Measurement Institute
Analyte LOR Blank Units Date of Holding * LRN Duplicate Recovery Acceptability
Analysis time met W14/019470 D % Limits
ortho-Phosphate (PO4-P) Leached 0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 14/11/2014 1.2 1.2 104 % 80 - 110
Trace Elements
Arsenic 0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 13/11/2014 0.6 0.6 113 % 75 - 120
Cadmium 0.4 <0.4 mg/kg 13/11/2014 <0.4 <0.4 93 % 75 - 120
Chromium 0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 13/11/2014 2.1 2.1 95 % 75 - 120
Copper 0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 13/11/2014 1.7 1.7 100 % 75 - 120
Lead 0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 13/11/2014 <0.5 <0.5 101 % 75 - 120
Mercury 0.1 <0.1 mg/kg 13/11/2014 <0.1 <0.1 83 % 75 - 120
Nickel 1.0 <1.0 mg/kg 13/11/2014 <1.0 <1.0 98 % 75 - 120
Zinc 1.0 <1.0 mg/kg 13/11/2014 3.9 3.8 98 % 75 - 120
* Holding time from "Guidelines for the Collection and Preservation of Samples" NMI WA May 2009 and is calculated from the day the sample was received at
NMI.
Date: 19/11/2014
PO Box 1246 Bentley DC WA 6983 Tel: +61 8 9368 8400 Fax: +61 8 9368 8499 www.measurement.gov.au
National Measurement Institute
False
1.00
1
True Environmental
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Work Order Page
: ES1424466 : 1 of 3
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for
release.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:
l General Comments
l Analytical Results
Address 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 | PHONE +61-2-8784 8555 | Facsimile +61-2-8784 8500
Environmental Division Sydney ABN 84 009 936 029 Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
Page : 2 of 3
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.
Key : CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting
l EP231: Poor matrix spike recoveries due to sample matrix interferences.
l PFOS and PFOA results are reported as an aggregate of linear and branched isomers.
Page : 3 of 3
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only
Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) Client sample ID W14/019473_Q10629- W14/019474_Q10629- W14/019475_Q10629- ---- ----
01 02 03
Client sampling date / time 06-NOV-2014 15:00 06-NOV-2014 15:00 06-NOV-2014 15:00 ---- ----
Compound CAS Number LOR Unit ES1424466-001 ES1424466-002 ES1424466-003 ---- ----
Environmental
QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
Work Order : ES1424466 Page : 1 of 6
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only QC Level : NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
Site : ----
C-O-C number : ---- Date Samples Received : 07-NOV-2014
Sampler : ---- Issue Date : 18-NOV-2014
Order number : LSU141108
No. of samples received :3
Quote number : ---- No. of samples analysed :3
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for
release.
This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report ; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits
l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
l Matrix Spike (MS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
Address 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 | PHONE +61-2-8784 8555 | Facsimile +61-2-8784 8500
Environmental Division Sydney ABN 84 009 936 029 Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
Page : 2 of 6
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Key : Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
RPD = Relative Percentage Difference
# = Indicates failed QC
Page : 3 of 6
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only
Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Result Concentration LCS Low High
Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Report
Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Report
Environmental
INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
Work Order : ES1424466 Page : 1 of 5
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only QC Level : NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
Site : ----
C-O-C number : ---- Date Samples Received : 07-NOV-2014
Sampler : ---- Issue Date : 18-NOV-2014
Order number : LSU141108
No. of samples received :3
Quote number : ---- No. of samples analysed :3
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.
Address 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 | PHONE +61-2-8784 8555 | Facsimile +61-2-8784 8500
Environmental Division Sydney ABN 84 009 936 029 Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
Page : 2 of 5
Work Order : ES1424466
Client : NATIONAL MEASUREMENT INSTITUTE
Project : PFOS PFOA extended suite - special price for Sydney only
Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics
14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.
Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and
should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.
Method Sample Date Extraction / Preparation Analysis
Container / Client Sample ID(s) Date extracted Due for extraction Evaluation Date analysed Due for analysis Evaluation
Summary of Outliers
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
The following report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW 846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits). This
report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only.
APPENDIX F
Water Corporation Information
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Success Fire Station Supply Information 2000 - 2014
The original water supply connection to the fire station located on Hammond Road in
the suburb of Success was from a 150mm diameter cast iron water main. In 2011 a
replacement 250mm diameter PVC pipe was commissioned and the 150mm cast
iron was decommissioned as a part of the construction of the Hammond Road dual
carriageway. Both the 25mm diameter domestic service and 100mm diameter fire
service were transferred over from the 150mm cast iron main to the 250mm diameter
PVC. At no stage was the Success Fires Station connected to the Jandakot
Groundwater Treatment Plant bore collector main.
The Success Fire Station is a part of the Thomson Lake water supply locality. Given
the size and the manner in which development has occurred over the last decade, it
is best to consider this locality as two separate zones when describing how water is
supplied – Thomson East and Thomson West zones. The Success Fire Station is
located in the Thomson East zone.
Figure 1 provides a schematic of the Thomsons Lake locality for the abovementioned
time span. In this configuration the Thomson West zone was supplied from the
Thomsons Lake Reservoir and the Thomson East Zone was supplied from the
760mm diameter steel main that was also used to provide refill of Thomsons Lake
Reservoir. The source water for this configuration was a blend of Hills (Dam) water
typically from Canning, Wungong and/or Churchmans Brook Dams controlled via
Beenyup Road Regulating Valve and groundwater from Jandakot Groundwater
Treatment Plant (GWTP). The blend of water supplied to the Thomson East zone
was the same as the blend of water supplied to the Thomson West zone.
Figure 2 provides a schematic of the Thomsons Lake locality for the abovementioned
time span. The changes in this configuration arose from the commissioning of the
Perth Seawater Desalination Plant (PSDP), dedicated rising main (pumping main)
from Jandakot GWTP to Thomsons Lake Reservoir, and the Bulk Water Transfer
Main to Serpentine Trunk Mains and Nicholson Road Pump Station. In this
configuration the Thomsons West zone was supplied a blend of desalination water
from PSDP and groundwater from Jandakot GWTP. The Thomson East zone
ceased being supplied with groundwater from Jandakot GWTP following the
commissioning of Rising Main and as such was only supplied hills water from
Canning, Wungong and/or Churchmans Brook Dams controlled via Beenyup Road
Regulating Valve.
Figure 3 provides a schematic of the Thomsons Lake locality for the abovementioned
time span. The changes in this configuration arose from the commissioning of
additional distribution mains that linked the Thomsons East and West zones. In this
(current) configuration the entire Thomsons Lake locality is supplied with a blend of
desalination water from PSDP and groundwater from Jandakot GWTP via Thomsons
Lake Reservoir.
Both Jandakot and PSDP typically have an annual two to four week maintenance
period during which time they are offline and not supplying any water. During this
time water is supplied back from Serpentine Trunk Main which can consist of hills
water and or desalination water from Southern Seawater Desalination Plant.
3
4
5
WORKPLACE POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT INVESTIGATION
APPENDIX G
Jandakot Water Treatment Plant – Safety Data Sheets
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Aluminium Sulfate
Coogee Chemicals Chemwatch Hazard Alert Code: 3
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Safety Data Sheet according to WHS and ADG requirements Initial Date: Not Available
S.GHS.AUS.EN
Product Identifier
Product name Aluminium Sulfate
Chemical Name ALUMINIUM SULFATE
Proper shipping name Not Applicable
Chemical formula Not Applicable
Other means of
Not Available
identification
CAS number Not Applicable
Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against
Hydrated grades as Alum are high volume commercial chemicals. Sizing paper, lakes, alums, dyeing mordant, agent in fire fighting foams, cloth fireproofing,
Relevant identified uses white leather tannage, pH control in paper industry, waterproofing agent for concrete, deodorizer and decolouriser in petroleum refining, sewage precipitating
agent and for water purification.
HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL. NON-DANGEROUS GOODS. According to the Model WHS Regulations and the ADG Code.
Label elements
Continued...
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Page 2 of 6 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Aluminium Sulfate
Hazard statement(s)
H315 Causes skin irritation
H318 Causes serious eye damage
H335 May cause respiratory irritation
Supplementary statement(s)
Not Applicable
Substances
See section below for composition of Mixtures
Mixtures
CAS No %[weight] Name
10043-01-3 >99 aluminium sulfate
Continued...
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Page 3 of 6 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Aluminium Sulfate
Extinguishing media
There is no restriction on the type of extinguisher which may be used.
Use extinguishing media suitable for surrounding area.
+ X + X O +
Control parameters
EMERGENCY LIMITS
Ingredient TEEL-0 TEEL-1 TEEL-2 TEEL-3
Aluminium Sulfate Not Available Not Available Not Available Not Available
Exposure controls
Appropriate engineering If exposure to workplace dust is not controlled, respiratory protection is required; wear SAA approved dust respirator.
Continued...
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Page 4 of 6 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Aluminium Sulfate
controls
Personal protection
Chemical goggles
Eye and face protection
|mono-goggles.
Skin protection See Hand protection below
Hands/feet protection Wear protective gloves, e.g. PVC.
Body protection See Other protection below
Overalls.
Other protection
P.V.C.
Thermal hazards Not Available
Continued...
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Page 5 of 6 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Aluminium Sulfate
Long term exposure to high dust concentrations may cause changes in lung function (i.e. pneumoconiosis) caused by particles less than 0.5 micron
Chronic
penetrating and remaining in the lung. A prime symptom is breathlessness.
|Repeated minor skin contact may result in numbing of fingers. Repeated minor ingestion may cause phosphate deficiency; weakening bones.
TOXICITY IRRITATION
Aluminium Sulfate
Not Available Not Available
TOXICITY IRRITATION
Asthma-like symptoms may continue for months or even years after exposure to the material ceases. This may be due to a non-allergenic condition known
ALUMINIUM SULFATE
as reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS) which can occur following exposure to high levels of highly irritating compound.
Oral (rat) TDLo: 10138 mg/kg/8D-C
CMR STATUS
Not Applicable
Toxicity
DO NOT discharge into sewer or waterways.
Bioaccumulative potential
Ingredient Bioaccumulation
Not Available Not Available
Continued...
Chemwatch: 4887-83 Page 6 of 6 Issue Date: 27/08/2014
Version No: 4.1.1.1 Print Date: 09/09/2014
Aluminium Sulfate
Mobility in soil
Ingredient Mobility
Not Available Not Available
Labels Required
Marine Pollutant NO
HAZCHEM Not Applicable
Air transport (ICAO-IATA / DGR): NOT REGULATED FOR TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS
Sea transport (IMDG-Code / GGVSee): NOT REGULATED FOR TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS
Safety, health and environmental regulations / legislation specific for the substance or mixture
"International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) - High Production Volume List","IMO MARPOL 73/78 (Annex II) - List of Noxious Liquid Substances
Carried in Bulk","Australia - Australian Capital Territory - Environment Protection Regulation: Ambient environmental standards (Domestic water supply -
inorganic chemicals)","Australia Exposure Standards","Australia - Australian Capital Territory - Environment Protection Regulation: Ambient environmental
standards (STOCK - inorganic chemicals)","Australia Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) Substances that may be used in Listed medicines","Australia
aluminium - Australian Capital Territory - Environment Protection Regulation: Pollutants entering waterways taken to cause environmental harm (STOCK)","IMO
sulfate(10043-01-3) is found MARPOL 73/78 (Annex II) - List of Other Liquid Substances","Australia Drinking Water Guideline Values For Physical and Chemical Characteristics","OECD
on the following regulatory List of High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals","Australia Inventory of Chemical Substances (AICS)","International Numbering System for Food
lists Additives","Australia High Volume Industrial Chemical List (HVICL)","WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality - Chemicals for which guideline values have
not been established","Sigma-AldrichTransport Information","Australia - Australian Capital Territory - Environment Protection Regulation: Pollutants entering
waterways taken to cause environmental harm - Domestic water supply quality","GESAMP/EHS Composite List - GESAMP Hazard Profiles","Australia
Hazardous Substances Information System - Consolidated Lists","Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) Compendium of Food
Additive Specifications - Firming agent","Acros Transport Information","IMO IBC Code Chapter 17: Summary of minimum requirements"
Other information
Classification of the preparation and its individual components has drawn on official and authoritative sources as well as independent review by the Chemwatch Classification committee using
available literature references.
A list of reference resources used to assist the committee may be found at:
www.chemwatch.net/references
The (M)SDS is a Hazard Communication tool and should be used to assist in the Risk Assessment. Many factors determine whether the reported Hazards are Risks in the workplace or other
settings. Risks may be determined by reference to Exposures Scenarios. Scale of use, frequency of use and current or available engineering controls must be considered.
This document is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, review or criticism, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any
process without written permission from CHEMWATCH. TEL (+61 3) 9572 4700.
end of SDS
# 002
Product Name AIR, COMPRESSED
2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
CLASSIFIED AS HAZARDOUS (GHS) ACCORDING TO SAFE WORK AUSTRALIA CRITERIA
RISK PHRASES
None allocated
SAFETY PHRASES
None allocated
Page 1 of 5
SDS Date: 17 Jul 2013
Product Name AIR, COMPRESSED
Environmental precautions Prevent from entering sewers, basements and workpits, or any place where its accumulation can be
dangerous.
Methods of cleaning up Carefully move material to a well ventilated remote area, then allow to discharge if safe to do so. Do
not attempt to repair leaking valve or cylinder safety devices.
PPE
Eye / Face Wear safety glasses.
Hands Wear leather gloves.
Body Wear safety boots.
Respiratory Not required under normal conditions of use.
Page 2 of 5
SDS Date: 17 Jul 2013
Product Name AIR, COMPRESSED
Page 3 of 5
SDS Date: 17 Jul 2013
Product Name AIR, COMPRESSED
Waste disposal
Legislation Dispose of in accordance with relevant local legislation.
UN number 1002 - -
Proper shipping name AIR, COMPRESSED (contains - -
Air)
APPLICATION METHOD: Gas regulator of suitable pressure and flow rating fitted to cylinder or
manifold with low pressure gas distribution to equipment.
Page 4 of 5
SDS Date: 17 Jul 2013
Product Name AIR, COMPRESSED
Report status This document has been compiled by RMT on behalf of the manufacturer, importer or supplier of the
product and serves as their Safety Data Sheet ('SDS').
It is based on information concerning the product which has been provided to RMT by the
manufacturer, importer or supplier or obtained from third party sources and is believed to represent
the current state of knowledge as to the appropriate safety and handling precautions for the product
at the time of issue. Further clarification regarding any aspect of the product should be obtained
directly from the manufacturer, importer or supplier.
While RMT has taken all due care to include accurate and up-to-date information in this SDS, it does
not provide any warranty as to accuracy or completeness. As far as lawfully possible, RMT accepts
no liability for any loss, injury or damage (including consequential loss) which may be suffered or
incurred by any person as a consequence of their reliance on the information contained in this SDS.
Revision: 1.1
SDS Date: 17 July 2013
End of SDS
Page 5 of 5
SDS Date: 17 Jul 2013
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Fluorosilicic Acid
ABN: 81 008 668 371
Clean up personnel will need personal protection equipment and respiratory protection. Portable safety shower
and eyewash facilities may also be needed for clean up personnel. Bags of neutralising agent or chemical
absorbent and substantial amounts of water will be required for large spill. A front-end loader may be required
to scoop up neutralised acid/lime/soda ash residue. Foam blanket may be required for large spills.
Mobility
• Air – mobility in aerosol form;
• Water – considerable solubility and mobility;
• Soil/Sediments – adsorption on minerals soil constituents – the proton occurring in clay may assist
with neutralisation; may dissolve carbonate based materials; some material may remain for transport
down towards the water table – on reaching the ground water table, the remnants of the acid may
continue to move, in the direction of the ground water flow;
• Conditions: slightly acid pH (fluorides) - lime addition may be required to rectify low pH resulting
from fluorosilicic acid spillages.
Environmental fate (exposure)
Acute ecotoxicity:
Fish: 96 hr LC50 (Salmo gairdneri): 51 mg/L, (as fluoride);
Crustaceans: 48 hr EC50 (Daphnia magna): 97 mg/L, (as fluoride), in fresh water conditions;
Crustaceans: 96 hr EC50 (Mysidopsis bahia): 10· 5 mg/L, (as fluoride), in salt water conditions;
Algae: 96 hr EC50 (Scenedesmus sp.): 43 mg/L, (as fluoride).
Chronic ecotoxicity:
Fish: 21 days LC50 (Salmo gairdneri): from 2·7 - 4· 7 mg/L, (as fluoride);
Crustaceans: 21 days NOEC (Daphnia magna): 3·7 mg/L, (as fluoride).
Bioaccumulative potential
Fluorosilicic acid has potential for bioaccumulation as fluorides into vegetables.
Kirk-Othmer Encyclopaedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edition, Wiley InterScience, New York, 1997.
Ullmann's Encyclopaedia of Industrial Chemistry, F. Ulmann, 6th Edition, Wiley Interscience, New York,
2001.
Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Drugs and Poisons, National Health and Medical Research Council,
Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1992.
Poisons Act 1964, State Law Publisher, Western Australia, Reprinted 22 January 1999.
Adopted National Exposure Standards for Atmospheric Contaminants in the Occupational Environmant,
[NHSC:1003(1991)].
Hazardous Materials Handbook for Emergency Responders, Onguard Training for Life, J. Varela (Editor),
Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1996.
Chemalert www.chemalert.net
Guidance for the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets for Fertilizer Materials, European Fertilizer
Manufacturers Association, online at www.efma.org/Publications/Guidance/Index.asp
Sources for data
Important Notes
1. To the best of our knowledge this document complies with the National Code of Practice for the
Preparation of Material Safety Data Sheets 2nd Edition [NOHSC:2011 (2003)].
2. This material safety data sheet summarises our best knowledge of the health and safety hazard
information of the product and how to safely handle and use the product in the workplace. Each user
should read this material safety data sheet and consider the information in the context of how the
product will be handled and used in the workplace, including in conjunction with other products.
3. If clarification or further information is needed to ensure that an appropriate risk assessment can be
made, the user should contact the Safety and Emergency Services Department, CSBP Limited on
(08) 9411 8777 (Australia), +61 8 9411 8777 (Overseas).
4. Our responsibility for products sold, is subject to our terms and conditions, a copy of which is sent to
our customers, and is also available on request.
5. CSBP reserves the right to make change to material safety data sheets without notice.
Recommended use of the chemical Disinfection, water treatment, bleaching, metal recovery, neutralising agent, oxidant.
and restrictions on use:
2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the Australian Dangerous Goods Code (ADG Code) for Transport by Road
and Rail; DANGEROUS GOODS.
The following health/environmental hazard categories fall outside the scope of the Workplace Health and Safety Regulations:
Acute Aquatic Toxicity - Category 1
Hazard Statement(s):
H270 May cause or intensify fire; oxidizer.
H280 Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated.
H315 Causes skin irritation.
H319 Causes serious eye irritation.
H331 Toxic if inhaled.
H335 May cause respiratory irritation.
H400 Very toxic to aquatic life.
Prevention:
P220 Keep / Store away from clothing / incompatible materials / combustible materials.
P244 Keep valves and fittings free from oil and grease.
P261 Avoid breathing dust / fume / gas / mist / vapours / spray.
P271 Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area.
P264 Wash hands thoroughly after handling.
P280 Wear protective gloves / protective clothing / eye protection / face protection.
P273 Avoid release to the environment.
Response:
P302+P352 IF ON SKIN: Wash with plenty of soap and water.
P332+P313 If skin irritation occurs: Get medical advice/attention.
P362 Take off contaminated clothing and wash before reuse.
P321 Specific treatment (see First Aid Measures on Safety Data Sheet).
P304+P340 IF INHALED: Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing.
P311 Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician.
P305+P351+P338 IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do.
Continue rinsing.
P337+P313 If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention.
P312 Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician if you feel unwell.
P370+P378 In case of fire: Use extinguishing media as outlined in Section 5 of this Safety Data Sheet to extinguish.
P391 Collect spillage.
Storage:
P403+P233 Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep container tightly closed.
P405 Store locked up.
Disposal:
P501 Dispose of contents/container in accordance with local/regional/national/international regulations.
3. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Components CAS Number Proportion Hazard Codes
Chlorine 7782-50-5 >=99.8% H331 H319 H335 H315
H400
Inhalation:
Remove victim from area of exposure - avoid becoming a casualty. Remove contaminated clothing and loosen remaining
clothing. Allow patient to assume most comfortable position and keep warm. Keep at rest until fully recovered. If patient finds
breathing difficult and develops a bluish discolouration of the skin (which suggests a lack of oxygen in the blood - cyanosis),
ensure airways are clear of any obstruction and have a qualified person give oxygen through a face mask. Apply artificial
respiration if patient is not breathing. Seek immediate medical advice.
Skin Contact:
If skin or hair contact occurs, immediately remove any contaminated clothing and wash skin and hair thoroughly with running
water. If swelling, redness, blistering or irritation occurs seek medical assistance. For skin burns, cover with a clean, dry
dressing until medical help is available. Launder contaminated clothing before reuse.
Ingestion:
Immediately rinse mouth with water. If swallowed, do NOT induce vomiting. Give a glass of water. Seek immediate medical
assistance.
Seek specialist advice. For large spills notify the Emergency Services.
Personal precautions/Protective equipment/Methods and materials for containment and cleaning up:
Clear area of all unprotected personnel. Wear protective equipment to prevent skin and eye contact and breathing in vapours.
Avoid breathing in vapours. Work up wind or increase ventilation. Air-supplied masks are recommended to avoid inhalation of
toxic material. For gas leak, DO NOT spray water directly on the leak or chlorine container. Use fire hoses equipped with fog
nozzles to disperse gas downwind. For liquid: Contain - prevent run off into drains and waterways. Use fog nozzles as
before. Do NOT allow any water to fall onto a pool of liquid chlorine as this will increase gas cloud. If safe to do so, cover with
large plastic sheet. Where possible vapour knock down water should be contained.
As published by Safe Work Australia Workplace Exposure Standards for Airborne Contaminants.
Peak Limitation - a maximum or peak airborne concentration of a particular substance determined over the shortest
analytically practicable period of time which does not exceed 15 minutes.
These Workplace Exposure Standards are guides to be used in the control of occupational health hazards. All atmospheric
contamination should be kept to as low a level as is workable. These workplace exposure standards should not be used as
fine dividing lines between safe and dangerous concentrations of chemicals. They are not a measure of relative toxicity.
Orica Personal Protection Guide No. 1, 1998: I - OVERALLS, CHEMICAL GOGGLES, SAFETY SHOES, FACE SHIELD OR
AIR MASK, GLOVES (Long).
* Not required if wearing air supplied mask.
Wear overalls, chemical goggles, full face shield, elbow-length impervious gloves. Use with adequate ventilation. If inhalation
risk exists, wear air-supplied mask meeting the requirements of AS/NZS 1715 and AS/NZS 1716. Always wash hands
before smoking, eating, drinking or using the toilet. Wash contaminated clothing and other protective equipment before
storage or re-use.
Possibility of hazardous reactions:Oxidising agent. Supports combustion of other materials and increases intensity of a
fire. Corrosive to some metals in the presence of moisture. (brass, copper, lead, nickel,
steel and stainless steel) Heating can cause expansion or decomposition of the
material, which can lead to the containers exploding. Can react with acids and some
nitrogen or phosphorous compounds. Hazardous polymerisation will not occur.
Conditions to avoid: Avoid exposure to heat, sources of ignition, and open flame. Avoid contact with
combustible substances. Do not allow water to come into contact with liquid chlorine.
Incompatible materials: Incompatible with combustible materials. Incompatible with heat and hot surfaces.
Incompatible with reducing agents.
Ingestion: Not a likely route of exposure, however, swallowing liquid will result in freeze burns of
the mouth, throat and stomach. Swallowing can result in chemical burns to the mouth,
throat and abdomen; perforation of the gastrointestinal tract and vomiting of blood and
eroded tissue.
Eye contact: A severe eye irritant. Corrosive to eyes; contact can cause corneal burns.
Contamination of eyes can result in permanent injury. Liquid splashes or spray may
cause freeze burns to the eye.
Skin contact: Liquid chlorine is corrosive to skin. Contact with skin will result in irritation. Liquid
splashes or spray may cause freeze burns.
Inhalation: Material is irritant to the mucous membranes of the respiratory tract (airways). May
cause coughing and shortness of breath. May cause adverse lung effects if high
concentrations are inhaled. Inhalation of vapours may cause severe breathing difficulties
and lung oedema. Delayed (up to 48 hours) fluid build up in the lungs may occur.
Severe exposure may cause lung damage. Overexposure may result in death.
Persistence/degradability: Does not accumulate in organisms. The material is not expected to bioconcentrate.
UN No: 1017
Transport Hazard Class: 2.3 Toxic Gas
Subrisk 1: 5.1 Oxidising Agent
Subrisk 2: 8 Corrosive
Proper Shipping Name or CHLORINE
Technical Name:
Marine Transport
Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code) for
transport by sea; DANGEROUS GOODS.
UN No: 1017
Transport Hazard Class: 2.3 Toxic Gas
Subrisk 1: 5.1 Oxidising Agent
Subrisk 2: 8 Corrosive
Product Name: CHLORINE Issued: 26/08/2013
Substance No: 000031098201 Version: 9
Page 6 of 8
Safety Data Sheet
Proper Shipping Name or CHLORINE
Technical Name:
Air Transport
TRANSPORT PROHIBITED under the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations for
transport by air in passenger aircraft and cargo aircraft.
The following health/environmental hazard categories fall outside the scope of the Workplace Health and Safety Regulations:
Acute Aquatic Toxicity - Category 1
Hazard Statement(s):
H270 May cause or intensify fire; oxidizer.
H280 Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated.
H315 Causes skin irritation.
H319 Causes serious eye irritation.
H331 Toxic if inhaled.
H335 May cause respiratory irritation.
H400 Very toxic to aquatic life.
This safety data sheet has been prepared by Orica Toxicology & SDS Services.
Maximum use rate for potable water treatment is 30 mg/L (as per NSF certification)
If clarification or further information is needed, the user should contact their Orica representative or Orica Limited at the
contact details on page 1.
Orica Limited's responsibility for the material as sold is subject to the terms and conditions of sale, a copy of which is
available upon request.
2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
CLASSIFIED AS HAZARDOUS ACCORDING TO SAFE WORK AUSTRALIA CRITERIA
RISK PHRASES
R35 Causes severe burns.
SAFETY PHRASES
S2 Keep out of reach of children.
S26 In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical advice
S37/39 Wear suitable gloves and eye/face protection.
Immediately dilute the corrosive substance by having the patient drink milk or water. If the trachea has been
damaged tracheostamy may be required. For oesophageal burns begin broad-spectrum antibiotics and
corticosteroid therapy. Intravenous fluids will be required if oesophageal or gastric damage prevents ingestion of
liquids. Long-range therapy will be directed toward preventing or treating oesophageal scars and strictures.
First Aid Facilities Eye wash facilities and safety shower should be available.
Hazchem Code 2R
Engineering Avoid inhalation. Use in well ventilated areas. Where an inhalation risk exists, mechanical extraction ventilation is
Controls recommended. Maintain vapour levels below the recommended exposure standard.
PPE Wear PVC or rubber gloves, splash-proof goggles, a PVC apron, rubber boots, full PVC coveralls (or better)
and a faceshield. At high vapour levels, wear: an Air-line respirator.
Page 2 of 4
RMT
Reviewed: 16 Jul 2010
Printed: 16 Jul 2010
Product Name CAUSTIC SODA 50% (COOGEE CHEMICALS)
Page 3 of 4
RMT
Reviewed: 16 Jul 2010
Printed: 16 Jul 2010
Product Name CAUSTIC SODA 50% (COOGEE CHEMICALS)
ABBREVIATIONS:
ADB - Air-Dry Basis.
BEI - Biological Exposure Indice(s)
CAS# - Chemical Abstract Service number - used to uniquely identify chemical compounds.
CNS - Central Nervous System.
EC No - European Community Number.
IARC - International Agency for Research on Cancer.
M - moles per litre, a unit of concentration.
mg/m3 - Milligrams per cubic metre.
NOS - Not Otherwise Specified.
NTP - National Toxicology Program.
OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
pH - relates to hydrogen ion concentration using a scale of 0 (high acidic) to 14 (highly alkaline).
ppm - Parts Per Million.
RTECS - Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances.
TWA/ES - Time Weighted Average or Exposure Standard.
HEALTH EFFECTS FROM EXPOSURE:
It should be noted that the effects from exposure to this product will depend on several factors including: frequency
and duration of use; quantity used; effectiveness of control measures; protective equipment used and method of
application. Given that it is impractical to prepare a Chem Alert report which would encompass all possible
scenarios, it is anticipated that users will assess the risks and apply control methods where appropriate.
It is based on information concerning the product which has been provided to RMT by the manufacturer or
obtained from third party sources and is believed to represent the current state of knowledge as to the appropriate
safety and handling precautions for the product at the time of issue. Further clarification regarding any aspect of
the product should be obtained directly from the manufacturer.
While RMT has taken all due care to include accurate and up-to-date information in this SDS, it does not provide
any warranty as to accuracy or completeness. As far as lawfully possible, RMT accepts no liability for any loss,
injury or damage (including consequential loss) which may be suffered or incurred by any person as a
consequence of their reliance on the information contained in this SDS.
APPENDIX H
Department of Health Fact Sheet
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
Copper in Drinking Water
Introduction
Copper is a metal that exists in the environment as a mineral in rocks and soil. It is
commonly found at low levels in natural water bodies. It is also an essential trace element
that is required to maintain good health.
Copper pipes are used extensively in plumbing systems throughout Western Australia and
in many countries of the world.
However, where copper pipes corrode they can release copper into your drinking water to a
level that can affect its quality and safety. The information contained in this guide will help
you identify signs of copper corrosion and provide advice on how to minimise its effect on
your health.
Summary
Normally less than 10% of your daily copper intake is through water consumption.
Consumption of high levels of copper can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, gastric
complaints and headaches.
A high level of copper in your drinking water will leave a metallic or bitter taste. This
water may not be safe to drink and you should contact your drinking water provider of
have the water professionally tested.
A low level of copper usually leaves a green/blue stain on taps, hand basins showers
etc. This water is still safe to drink.
More Information:
Water Unit
Environmental Health Directorate
Department of Health
PO Box 8172
PERTH BUSINESS CENTRE WA 6849
APPENDIX I
Limitations
February 2015
Report No. 1413531-001-R-Rev1
LIMITATIONS
This Document has been provided by Golder Associates Pty Ltd (“Golder”)
subject to the following limitations:
This Document has been prepared for the particular purpose outlined in
Golder’s proposal and no responsibility is accepted for the use of this
Document, in whole or in part, in other contexts or for any other purpose.
The scope and the period of Golder’s Services are as described in Golder’s
proposal, and are subject to restrictions and limitations. Golder did not perform
a complete assessment of all possible conditions or circumstances that may
exist at the site referenced in the Document. If a service is not expressly
indicated, do not assume it has been provided. If a matter is not addressed, do
not assume that any determination has been made by Golder in regards to it.
Conditions may exist which were undetectable given the limited nature of the
enquiry Golder was retained to undertake with respect to the site. Variations in
conditions may occur between investigatory locations, and there may be special
conditions pertaining to the site which have not been revealed by the
investigation and which have not therefore been taken into account in the
Document. Accordingly, additional studies and actions may be required.
In addition, it is recognised that the passage of time affects the information and
assessment provided in this Document. Golder’s opinions are based upon
information that existed at the time of the production of the Document. It is
understood that the Services provided allowed Golder to form no more than an
opinion of the actual conditions of the site at the time the site was visited and
cannot be used to assess the effect of any subsequent changes in the quality of
the site, or its surroundings, or any laws or regulations.
Any assessments made in this Document are based on the conditions indicated
from published sources and the investigation described. No warranty is
included, either express or implied, that the actual conditions will conform
exactly to the assessments contained in this Document.
Where data supplied by the client or other external sources, including previous
site investigation data, have been used, it has been assumed that the
information is correct unless otherwise stated. No responsibility is accepted by
Golder for incomplete or inaccurate data supplied by others.
This Document is provided for sole use by the Client and is confidential to it and
its professional advisers. No responsibility whatsoever for the contents of this
Document will be accepted to any person other than the Client. Any use which
a third party makes of this Document, or any reliance on or decisions to be
made based on it, is the responsibility of such third parties. Golder accepts no
responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of
decisions made or actions based on this Document.