Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

ORROSION: Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking

The combination of tensile stress and a specific corrosive environment can crack stainless steels. This mode of attack is termed stress
corrosion cracking (SCC). The most common environmental exposure condition responsible for SCC of stainless steels is the presence of
chlorides. Although no stainless steel grade is totally immune to chloride SCC, the relative resistance of stainless steels varies substantially.

Influence of Alloy Composition:

The relative resistance to chloride SCC is dependant on the stainless steel family. The austenitic family of stainless steels is the most
susceptible. The resistance of austenitic stainless steels to SCC is related to the nickel content of the steel.

The most susceptible austenitic grades have nickel contents in the range of 8 to 10 w t%. Therefore, standard grades such as 304/304L and
316/316L are very susceptible to this mode of attack. Austenitic grades w ith relatively high nickel and molybdenum contents such as alloy 20,
904L, and the 6% molybdenum super austenitic grades have substantially better chloride SCC resistance.

The ferritic family of stainless steels, w hich includes grades such as type 430 and 444 are very resistant to chloride SCC. The duplex stainless
steel w ith their dual austenite/ferrite microstructures has a resistance that is in betw een that of the austenite and ferrite grades.

Corrosion Testing
The relative resistance of a stainless steel to chloride SCC is often quantified by the use of standard boiling salt solutions. The follow ing table
summarizes the results of testing in boiling salt solutions of 26% NaCl (sodium chloride), 33% LiCl (lithium chloride), and 42% MgCl2 (magnesium
chloride). The boiling LiCl and MgCl2 test solutions are very aggressive relative to practical applications and only austenitic alloys w ith
compositions that approach those of nickel-base alloys w ill routinely resist cracking in these test solutions.

Table 1: Relative chloride SCC resistance measured using fully immersed U-bend specimens in standard boiling salt solutions. (Taken from
producer data)

42% MgCl2 33% LiCl 26% NaCl

Austenitic SST
Type 304L (S30403) SCC SCC SCC
Type 316L (S31603) SCC SCC SCC
904L (N08904) SCC SCC No Cracking
6% Mo SST SCC SCC No Cracking
Alloy 20 (N08020) SCC No Cracking No Cracking
Duplex SST
2205 (S32205) SCC No Cracking No Cracking
255 (S32550) SCC --- No Cracking
2507 (32750) SCC --- No Cracking
Ferritic SST
439 (S43035) No Cracking No Cracking No Cracking
444 (S44400) No Cracking No Cracking No Cracking

Crack Appearance
The typical crack morphology for chloride stress corrosion cracking consists of branched transgranular cracks. Figure 1 show s the cracking
that occurred on a 6Mo super austenitic stainless steel (N08367) exposed to 0.2% chlorides at 500 °F (260 °C)
Figure 1: Typical appearance of chloride stress corrosion cracking

Photo courtesy of TMR Stainless

Environmental Factors:
The environmental factors that increase the cracking susceptibility include higher temperatures, increased chloride content, low er pH, and higher
levels of tensile stress. Temperature is an important variable. When stainless steels are fully immersed, it is rare to see chloride stress corrosion
cracking at temperatures below 60 °C (150 °F).

There is a synergistic relationship betw een dissolved oxygen and the chloride level. If the oxygen level is reduced to the 0.01 to 0.1 ppm range,
aqueous solutions containing low to moderate chloride levels are not likely to crack austenitic alloys, such as 304L and 316L. The normal
solubility of O2 in w ater at room to moderate temperatures (e.g. up to 140°F/60°C) is 4.5 to 8 ppm at atmospheric pressure.

In actual service environments, evaporation can produce local build-up of aggressive corrosive substances, such as chlorides and the H+ ions,
resulting in conditions that are substantially more aggressive. Under severe evaporative conditions, stainless steels can crack at temperatures
w ell below the thresholds measured under conditions w here there is full immersion. Because of this, one must use caution w hen specifying
materials for applications that involve the evaporation of chloride-bearing solutions on hot stainless steel surfaces.

The Materials Technology Institute (MTI) of the Chemical Process Industry has review ed literature and collected case histories to define guidelines
for the chloride SCC susceptibility of types 304L and 316L stainless steel in neutral w ater environments.

Figure 2 show s the cracking threshold for 304L and 316L stainless steel as a function of temperature and chloride content. The level of
chlorides required to produce cracking is relatively low. Failures have been reported in environments w ith as little as 10 ppm chlorides. This is
particularly true for environments having concentrating (evaporating) mechanisms such as w et/dry interfaces or a film of solution in immediate
contact w ith a heat-rejecting surface. In these situations, a few ppm of chlorides in the bulk solution can concentrate to hundreds of ppm in the
area of evaporation.

Figure 2: Cracking threshold for 304 and 316 alloys exposed to near neutral chloride-bearing w aters
The cracking threshold of a 6Mo super austenitic stainless steel (UNS N08367) immersed in oxygen-bearing neutral chloride solutions is show n in
Figure 3. The temperature thresholds are w ell above the 212°F (100°C) range, indicating that exposures to atmospheric boiling in neutral chloride
solutions are very unlikely to produce cracking.

Figure 3: Cracking threshold for a 6Mo super austenitic steel ( UNS N08367) immersed in neutral NaCl solutions.

Courtesy of TMR Stainless

Swimming Pools