such as adjacent utilities or structures.

The survey should be performed in an area

sufficient in size to show equipment set-up and storage locations.
Information to be gathered during the survey should include, but not be limited to,
the following:
• Existing grade elevation data referenced to a public datum if practical;
• Surface features such as roadways, sidewalks, utility poles, overhead power
lines, fire hy-drants,
• Ledge or rock outcrops;
• Boring/test pit locations;
• Waterways;
• Potentially delineated wetlands;
• Culverts;
• Visible subsurface utility landmarks such as manholes or valve boxes; and
• Structures such as buildings, towers, or bridges adjacent to the proposed
drilled path.
Waterway crossings also require a hydrographic survey. The hydrographic survey
should include tidal ranges and edges of waterways. It should be conducted along
the proposed drill path and in-clude data as appropriate upstream and downstream of
the path.
Construction control points shall be established sufficiently far away from the
work so as not to be affected by ground movement caused by the construction
operations. Such control points shall be checked regularly against permanent bench
marks to ensure the accuracy of the HDD construc-tion is not compromised by ground
movement.
6.8.2 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
Once the surface survey data have been obtained, evaluation of subsurface features
can be initi-ated. Subsurface feature concerns that may affect HDD design and
therefore should be investi-gated include the presence of existing utilities,
adjacent structure foundations or other manmade
Obstructions, and geotechnical and hazardous materials conditions along the
proposed HDD alignment.
6.8.3 Geotechnical Investigation
The contractor will carry out geotechnical investigation of the HDD route.
A second phase of subsurface investigation for HDD projects is the determination of
soil conditions. Once the proposed routing has been identified, a geotechnical
investigation should be performed. The geotechnical investigation should be
tailored to suit the complexity of the installation being de-signed. A general
geologic review involves examining existing geological data to determine what
conditions might be encountered in the vicinity of the installation. Existing data
may be available from construction project records in the area of the HDD
(buildings, piers, bridges,).
A typical geotechnical survey consists of taking exploratory borings to collect
soil samples for clas-sification and laboratory analysis.
The number, location, and depth of exploratory borings should be determined taking
into account site-specific conditions such as the general geology of the area,
availability of access, availability of existing data, cost, etc. Borings should be
located off of the drilled path centerline to reduce the

Pigging and gauging activities shall be submitted as part the Contractors pressure
testing procedure.
7.6.17.2 At the completion of the carrier pipe pull, the carrier pipes are to be
pigged and flushed clean. A number of cleaning passes may be required until clean
water remains in the carrier pipes. Pig selection shall be relevant to the pipeline
material and confirmed with a pig supplier and/or manufacturer. Cleaning acceptance
criteria shall be ≤10mm dust penetration with a low density foam pig for a maximum
length of 2km. For sections exceeding 2km an agreed value between Unitywater and
the Contractor is to be established.
7.6.17.3 Cleaning pigs shall be numbered, logged, condition noted and comments
surrounding debris removed. Any pigging near residents or the general public shall
be controlled to ensure material exiting the pipeline is controlled and does not
impact the surrounding area. Silencers shall be used when appropriate.
7.6.17.4 When pigging with compressed air, gauges shall be used at both ends with
constant communication between launching and receiving ends. No tools shall be used
on the pipeline until both ends of the pipeline have confirmed the gauges read
0kPa.
7.6.17.5 The gauging pig is to be sized to the internal diameter of each carrier
pipe according to the project specific specification. The Contractor is to complete
this work and use a fit for purpose cleaning pig and gauging pig. The gauge plate
shall be a minimum 3mm thick, 95% of the internal diameter, segmented and shall be
free of defects once received. Location of the gauge plate on the gauging pig is to
be at the Contractors discretion. Gauge plate material shall not be able to damage
the parent material of the pipeline.
7.6.18 Alignment Tolerances
7.6.18.1 The HDD bore path must follow the approved designed alignment and conform
to the allowable tolerances depicted in Table 12 below unless otherwise detailed in
the Project Specific Specification.
7.6.18.2 The alignment shall be constructed on the project specific centre lines
and agreed to by the Superintendent’s Representative and Principal.
Table 12

i. The Contractor shall be responsible for the design and construction of all
aspects of the HDD works including any temporary works and temporary supporting
structures. All de-sign assumptions regarding subsurface conditions, equipment
requirements, groundwater and other factors are the responsibility of the
Contractor and shall be fully documented.
ii. Based on the alignment shown in the Principal Drawings, the Contractor shall
design and size the excavated profile to accommodate all temporary and permanent
works.
iii. A design vertical and horizontal profile shall be submitted to the
Superintendent’s
Representative for review prior to commencement of work.
iv. The Contractor shall not proceed with any work until the Contractor’s RPE
certified design has been accepted by the Superintendent’s Representative.
Acceptance of the Contrac-tor’s design by the Superintendent’s Representative in no
way diminishes the responsibility of the Contractor for the design.
v. The HDD crossing shall be designed in accordance with this Specification and
the refer-enced documents by a person suitably qualified and having experience with
the design considerations required for this type of work. The profile design shall
take into account the following:
• Temporary works associated with the HDD construction;

The Contractor shall notify the Company of any conflict between this specification,
the Codes and Standards and any other specification included as part of the Project
documen-tation.
This specification and the guidelines set forth do not relieve the Contractor, its
Sub- Con-tractors and Vendors of the responsibility to provide a finished product
capable of perform-ing its intended service.
Any exception to this specification and referenced documentation shall be raised by
the Contractor and approved by the Company in writing, following the applicable
procedure for concession requests as defined in the Quality Management Procedures
of the Project.
During further stages of the project (detailed design) Contractor is obliged to
verify calcula-tions, the design and dimensions of all equipment using its own
calculations based on pro-cess, design, safety and warranty data given in the
tender documentation. The detailed de-sign must be agreed upon with the Company.

HDD crossings are often undertaken to minimize the adverse environmental

effects at watercourse crossings. Nevertheless, an HDD does not guarantee that all
adverse environmental effects will be prevented. Common adverse effects are the
result of:
• inadvertent returns of drilling fluids into the aquatic, terrestrial or
social/cultural environments; and, to a lesser extent,
• disturbance of soils, vegetation, wildlife and social/cultural elements arising
from either construction of drill sites, exit areas, access roads and temporary
vehicle crossings, or the HDD activity.
Further details on the environmental effects of inadvertent releases can be found
in many documents, including:
• Horizontal Directional Drilling Best Management Practices Manual, Topical
Report. Gas Research Institute. May, 2002; and
• Quantifying the Effects of Sediment Release on Fish and Fish Habitats,
Anderson, P.G., B.R. Taylor and G. Balch. 1995. Prepared for the Department
of Fisheries and Oceans.
7.1 Aquatic

Tension
Tension on the pull section results from three primary sources: (1) frictional
drag between the pipe and the wall of the hole, (2) fl uidic drag from
viscous drilling fl uid surrounding the pipe, and (3) the effective (submerged)
weight of the pipe as it is pulled through the hole. In addition
to these forces that act within the drilled hole, frictional drag from the
portion of the pull section remaining on the surface (typically supported
on rollers) also contributes to the tensile load on the pipe.
Additional loads that the horizontal drilling rig must overcome during
pull back result from the length of the drill string in the hole and the
reaming assembly that precedes the pull section. These loads don ’ t act on
the pull section and therefore have no effect on pipe stresses. Nonetheless,
if a direct correlation with the overall rig force is desired, loads resulting
from the reaming assembly and drill string must be estimated and added
to the tensile force acting on the pull section.
Calculation of the tensile load required to install a pipeline by HDD
is complicated due to the fact that the geometry of the drilled path must
be considered along with properties of the pipe being installed, subsurface
materials, and drilling fl uid. Assumptions and simplifi cations
are typically required. A theoretical pulling load may be calculated by
hand or with the aid of one of several commercially available software
packages.
Regardless of the method used to calculate an HDD pulling load, the
design engineer should be aware that numerous variables affect pulling
loads, many of which depend upon site-specifi c conditions and individual
contractor practices. These include prereaming diameter, hole stability,
removal of cuttings, soil and rock properties, drilling fl uid properties,
drilled path geometry, and the effectiveness of buoyancy control measures.
Such variables cannot easily be accounted for in a theoretical
calculation method designed for use over a broad range of applications.
For this reason, theoretical calculations are of limited benefi t unless
combined with engineering judgment derived from experience in HDD
construction.
The fi rst step in calculating a pulling load is to analyze the drilled path.
This analysis can be based on the designed drilled path, a “worst-case”
drilled path, or “as-built” pilot-hole data, if available. Bearing in mind
that most pilot holes are drilled longer, deeper, and to tighter radii than
designed, a conservative approach in the absence of as-built pilot-hole
data is to evaluate a worst-case drilled path that accounts for potential
deviations from the design. This worst-case path should be determined
based on allowable tolerances for pilot-hole length, elevation, and curve
radius as defi ned in the contract documents. The design engineer should
be aware that deviations in these parameters are typical and are often due

At least one (1) reading per drill rod is required during the drilling of the pilot
hole, registering inclination, heading, length, depth and the orientation of the
bent sub. This information shall be recorded on the steering log and be available
for inspection of the superintendent as and when required.
7.7.2.3 The Contractor shall ensure proper calibration of all equipment before
commencing directional drilling operation and provide proof of calibration
documentation to the Superintendent’s Representative

For steel piping operating above –20F, alloy steel studs ASTM
A193 Grade B7, with ASTM A194 Class 2H semi-finished heavy
hex nuts shall be used except for sulphide stress cracking service
where stud bolts shall be ASTM A193 Grade B7M. For steel piping
operating below –20F, ie: blowdown service, ASTM A320, Gr L7
studs, with ASTM A194, Gr 7 semi-finished hex nuts shall be used,
except for sulfide stress cracking services where stud bolts shall be
ASTM A320, Gr L7M.
For steel piping operating above –20F, alloy steel studs ASTM
A193 Grade B7, with ASTM A194 Class 2H semi-finished heavy
hex nuts shall be used except for sulphide stress cracking service
where stud bolts shall be ASTM A193 Grade B7M. For steel piping
operating below –20F, ie: blowdown service, ASTM A320, Gr L7
studs, with ASTM A194, Gr 7 semi-finished hex nuts shall be used,
except for sulfide stress cracking services where stud bolts shall be
ASTM A320, Gr L7M.
(2) Bolting threads and lengths shall conform to the dimensions listed
in the appropriate national or industry flange standard. Headed
bolts (rather than stud bolts) shall not be used without prior PTT
approval.
(3) All bolts and nuts shall be coated with PTFE, or equivalent
material.
(4) For Austenitic bolting materials shall be in accordance with piping
material classification data sheets.
1.4.6 Proprietary Connectors
Proprietary connectors shall be used as required by project Specifications.
1.5 Design Considerations for Particular Piping Systems
1.5.1 General
This
(2) Bolting threads and lengths shall conform to the dimensions listed
in the appropriate national or industry flange standard. Headed
bolts (rather than stud bolts) shall not be used without prior PTT
approval.
(3) All bolts and nuts shall be coated with PTFE, or equivalent
material.
(4) For Austenitic bolting materials shall be in accordance with piping
material classification data sheets.
1.4.6 Proprietary Connectors
Proprietary connectors shall be used as required by project Specifications.
1.5 Design Considerations for Particular Piping Systems
1.5.1 General
This

Technical and Environmental Issues

3.1 Issue Identification
The finish required by B16.5 for steel raised-face flanges is also to
be used for non-steel metallic flanges, for steel male and female
flanges, that is 125 to 250 micro inches. For steel tongue and
grove flanges gasket face finish shall be 32-63 micro inches.
(5) For NPS 26” and larger, ASME B16.47 SERIES A flanges shall be
used. Use SERIES B flanges only when needed to mate with
equipment flanges. When attached to pipe with a yield strength
greater than 248.4 MPa (36000 psi), the hub thickness requires
prior PTT approval.
(6) Except for galvanized piping threaded flanges shall not be used
without prior PTT approval and then only in steel NPS 2 and
smaller.
(7) The bore of weld neck flanges to be used in severe cyclic
conditions, ie: reciprocating pumps and compressors, or in services
with high corrosion rates shall have the same ID as the attached
piping. If the ID is not the same, the flange shall be taper bored
conditions may bear on the abandonment decision-making process.
The development and implementation of an abandonment plan consists of at least the
following seven steps:
(1) review prevailing regulatory requirements applicable to the abandonment
project; (2) compile all relevant information on the pipeline system, including
easement agreements; (3) analyze by segment taking into account the factors
addressed in Section 3 of this paper, including present and future land use; (4)
develop the abandonment plan in consultation with stakeholders (such as landowners,
government authorities, and other directly affected parties), incorporating the
information compiled in the above steps; (5) secure regulatory and landowner
approvals as required for the pipeline abandonment and site reclamation; (6)
implement the abandonment plan, the scope of which should include post-abandonment
responsibilities (addressed in Section 4); and (7) secure final regulatory release.

A proponent undertaking an abandonment plan should follow these six steps,

recognizing that site-specific conditions may require additional steps in the
development of the plan.
Please refer to the next page for a flowchart of the abandonment planning process
and to Appendix B for a detailed abandonment checklist.
Page
the removal of equipment or buildings or other structures or appurtenances; # the
conducting of investigations to determine the presence of substances; # the
decontamination of buildings or other structures or other appurtenances, or land or
water; # the stabilization, contouring, maintenance conditioning, or
reconstruction of the land surface; or # any other procedure, operation, or
requirement specified in the regulations
(as defined in the Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act)
Removal The pipeline is completely removed from the rightof-way.
Roach Excess soil placed over the ditch line to compensate for soil settlement.
Road or Railway Crossing
The crossing by a pipeline of a highway, road, street, or railway.
Sight Block
A mechanism to restrict the visual impact of a pipeline right-of-way.
Soil The naturally occurring, unconsolidated mineral or organic material at least
10 centimetres thick that occurs at the earth's surface and is capable of
supporting plants. It includes disturbance of the surface by human activities such
as cultivation and logging but not displaced materials such as mine spoils.
Spoil Soil materials other than topsoil excavated from the trench. In most cases,
the excavated soil is suitable for return to the pipeline trench, and allows for
recontouring of the right-of-way.
Subsoil Although a common term it cannot be defined accurately. It may be the B
horizon of a soil with a distinct profile. It can also be defined as the zone below
the plowed soil in which roots normally grow.
Surface Water
Water in a watercourse and water at a depth of not more than 15 metres beneath the
surface of the ground.
Suspension The cessation of normal operation of a pipeline pursuant to its licensed
use. The pipeline need not be rendered permanently incapable of its licensed use,
but must be left in a safe and stable state during this period of suspension, as
prescribed by the applicable regulations and guidelines. See also "deactivation".

The SDV valve will be provided at the station inlet and outlet. In case of an
emergency event the SDV valves will cut off the gas supply from the suppliers and
to the pipelines.
The compressor station will be designed for locally manned, fully automatic,
permanent operation from Station Control Room with remote monitoring of the station
from the Central Control Room.
9.2 Pig Receiver
Pig Receivers will be provided at all pipelines entering the compressor station.
The pig receiver is described in section 10.8.
9.3 Filter Separator Skid
The filter separators, as described in section 10.1, shall be provided at Obigbo
Compressor Station at each gas supply source.
The filter separator design and operating conditions are: Parameter Value QIT
Source Obigbo Node Source Cawthorne and Alakiri Source Okono/Okpoho
Design Pressure
98.0 barg
98.0 barg
98.0 barg
98.0 barg
Design Temperature
Abandonment issues arise from the need to address public safety, environmental
protection, and future land use. An initial scoping exercise was carried out to
identify the various technical and environmental issues associated with
abandonment. Following the development of a detailed issues list, field studies of
existing abandoned facilities were performed to verify the issues. In some cases,
detailed studies were commissioned in order to better understand the effects and
interactions of certain issues. 2
____________________ 2 (Refer to the Bibliography in Appendix E for a list of the
studies, copies of which are available for public viewing in the libraries of CAPP,
CEPA, the EUB, and the NEB.)
The primary issues that were identified, and which are addressed in this section,
are as follows:
# land use management; # ground subsidence; # soil and groundwater contamination;
# pipe cleanliness; # water crossings; # erosion; # utility and pipeline
crossings; # creation of water conduits; # associated apparatus; and # cost of
abandonment.
It was determined that most issues are not unique to the abandonment phase of the
pipeline life-cycle, but could involve an altered scope, varied timeline, or
additional stakeholders when compared to the issues of pipeline installation and
operation. In order to responsibly abandon a pipeline, the operator must consider
all of the issues and determine how they relate to the specific pipeline under
consideration, in addition to addressing stakeholder concerns and incorporating
collected input.
In any abandonment project, it is possible that a combination of both the
abandonment-in-place and removal options would be used, based on sitespecific
requirements. Thus, it is important that all aspects of the abandonment issues be
considered. As the following discussion illustrates, the abandonmen-in-place option
does not eliminate the need for land disturbance or field activity, while pipeline
removal need not encompass the same level of disturbance or activity as that of
pipeline construction.
3.2 Land Use Management
Land use is the most important factor to consider in determining whether a pipeline
section should be abandoned in place or removed. Therefore, an understanding of the
current and potential land uses along the pipeline right-of-way is essential to
making informed decisions on available

abandonment. The issue was not pursued again until 1990, when industry, the Alberta
Energy Resources Conservation Board (now the EUB), and Alberta Environmental
Protection (AEP) discussed the issue of pipeline abandonment while considering
amendments to the pipeline regulations issued pursuant to the Pipeline Act (Revised
Statutes of Alberta 1980). The issue was not resolved at that time, and was again
raised in 1993 by the Alberta Pipeline Environmental Steering Committee, an
industry, government, and public stakeholder group established to address pipeline
related issues.
In October 1993, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) received
the endorsement of the Alberta Petroleum Industry Government Environment Committee
to establish a steering committee to oversee the issue of pipeline abandonment.
Shortly thereafter, the EUB requested that CAPP and the Canadian Energy Pipeline
Association (CEPA) organize a steering committee to resolve the concerns
surrounding abandonment.
In April 1994, representatives from CAPP, CEPA, the EUB, and the NEB met to
establish a pipeline abandonment steering committee. It was also decided at that
time that separate subcommittees be struck to address the technical, environmental,
legal, and financial aspects of pipeline abandonment. The technical and
environmental subcommittees were the first to be formed and, together with the
steering committee, were responsible for this discussion paper. The legal and
financial subcommittees have not yet been struck.
1.3 Scope
This discussion paper is intended to apply to all buried metallic pipeline
facilities falling within the scope of the CSA Z662-94 "Oil and Gas Pipeline
Systems" standard, except for offshore pipelines. Many of the same issues and
concepts (such as those relating to land use and pipe cleanliness) also apply to
plastic and fibreglass pipelines. It addresses pipeline abandonment only (i.e.
permanent removal from service), and does not consider pipeline deactivation (i.e.
temporary removal from service). Likewise, this document does not address the
abandonment of aboveground facilities associated with pipelines, such as stations
or tank farms, or specific facilities such as underground vaults.
This paper addresses the technical and environmental aspects of pipeline
abandonment. In order to complete the assessment, a review of the legal and
financial aspects of pipeline abandonment needs to be undertaken. More
particularly, the core issues of long-term liability and funding need to be
addressed both in the context of orphaned pipelines and those with an identifiable
owner/operator.
1.4 Abandonment Options
The two basic options that are considered in this paper are (i) abandonment-in-
place and (ii) pipeline removal. In the former case, it is assumed for the purposes
of this paper that cathodic protection of the pipeline is discontinued and that no
other measures are taken to maintain the structural integrity of the abandoned
pipeline (other than the potential use of solid fill material at roadway and
railway crossing sites or other locations highly sensitive to ground subsidence).
As noted in Section 2, for any large-scale abandonment project it is unlikely that
only one of these options will be employed. Rather, a project will usually
Page

Fire Fighting Pumping Station Shed

 Buildings in Common Area including: Administration & Security Building, Entrance
Security Check Building, , Guesthouse, Prayer House.
 Two paved Storage Areas
 One Storage Area with shelter
 Civil installations including: equipment and piping foundations, helipad, access
road, car parking lots, internal roads, site closed and open drain systems and
security fencing.
During Early Gas Phase and Phase 1 the provision for required facilities shall be
made to allow for expansion from Phase 1 to Phase 2. This will include sizing of
main inlet and outlet headers for Phase 2 flow rates, provision of blind flanged,
valved connections for future TUCOs. Appropriate free space and CS arrangement
shall allow for installation and connection of the Phase 2 TUCO units and coolers
with required piping. The utility systems shall not be designed for Phase 2.
9.1 General Information & Process Description
The main purpose of the Obigbo Compressor Station is to gather the gas supplied
from QIT and existing adjacent gas plants, to boost and transfer the gas to OB3
pipeline and Ajaokuta.
The gas will be delivered to the Obigbo Compressor Station from the following
sources:
 QIT through the QIT-Obigbo CS pipeline section;
 Cawthorne Channel and Alakiri GP through Cawthorne Channel-Alakiri-Obigbo CS
pipeline section;
 Existing Obigbo Node and Okoloma through interconnecting pipeline section
connecting 14” Obigbo CS Tie-in Station;
 Okono/Okpoho through pipeline that is beyond TNGP Project scope of work.
The gas supply flow rates to the Compressor Station for the individual gas supply
pipeline will be controlled by the gas supplier. The supplier will set the
sufficient gas pressure at the inlet to the pipeline system based on agreed gas
nomination. The gas from each gas supplier will arrive at the CS and will be
transferred to the dedicated for each gas supplier Inlet Filter Separators
installed to protect the subsequent process components from potential damages and
malfunction. From filters, the gas will be transferred to the Inlet Metering and
Control Packages. Since the gas arrives at compressor station at different pressure
from different suppliers, the PCV which is part of the metering and control package
will equalize the gas arrival pressure supplied from different sources and to
maintain constant gas supply to the CS suction header,