Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Indonesia
Ethno-religious Violence in Indonesia illustrates in detail how and why two previ-
ously harmonious religious communities can descend into violent conflict. Lasting
from 1999 until 2000, the conflict in North Maluku, Indonesia, saw the most
intense communal violence of Indonesia’s turbulent period of democratization.
For almost a year, militias waged a brutal religious war which claimed the lives of
nearly 4,000 people. The conflict culminated in ethnic cleansing along lines of reli-
gious identity, with approximately 300,000 people fleeing their homes.
Based on four years of research, including almost one year living in North
Maluku interviewing combatants, politicians and security personnel among
others, the book provides the first comprehensive account of this violence. The
accounts of participants and witnesses give the reader the opportunity to better
understand the tensions and fears involved in the conflict and begin to grasp the
motives of those who kill large numbers of men, women and children. The book
provides numerous examples of how different conflict theories can be applied in
the analysis of real situations of tensions and violence, illustrating the mutually
reinforcing nature of mass level sentiment and elite agency, and the rational and
emotive influences on those involved.
This book will be of interest to researchers in Asian studies, conflict studies and
religious violence.
Chris Wilson completed his PhD at the Research School of Pacific and Asian
Studies, Australian National University.
Routledge Contemporary Southeast Asia Series
Chris Wilson
First published 2008 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN
Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada
by Routledge
270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
List of illustrations x
Acknowledgements xi
Introduction 1
3 Initiation – Malifut 49
8 Conclusion 177
Notes 197
Bibliography 231
Index 239
Illustrations
Tables
1 Phases of the North Maluku conflict 4
2 Chronology of events before violence in Tobelo City, 1999 103
Maps
1 Indonesia xiv
2 North Maluku 30
3 Kao/Malifut 53
4 Ternate 75
5 Tidore 87
6 Tobelo 100
7 Galela 116
Acknowledgements
adat tradition
FKPKHU North Halmahera Christian Youth Communication Forum
FPI Front Pembela Islam, or Islamic Defenders Front
GMIH Gereja Masehi Injili Halmahera, Evangelical Church on
Halmahera
GPM Gereja Protestan Maluku, or Maluku Protestant Church
Hibua Lamo System of binding cultural ties between families in North
Halmahera
IDP Internally Displaced Person
Laskar Jihad Islamic militia formed on Java in early 2000
NHM Nusa Halmahera Mineral (mining company operating in Malifut
area)
Pasukan Jihad Islamic militia formed in North Maluku in early 2000
PDI–P Partai Demokrasi Indonesia – Perjuangan, or Indonesian
Democratic Party – Struggle
PP42 Government Regulation 42 creating Malifut Sub-District
PPP Partai Persatuan Pembangunan, or United Development Party
RMS Republik Maluku Selatan, or Republic of South Maluku sepa-
ratist movement
TNI Tentara Nasional Indonesia, or Indonesian National Military
Map 1 Indonesia
Introduction
Behind a mosque in the remote coastal village of Kao in North Maluku, eastern
Indonesia, there lies a large stone grave. The remains of seven warriors rest inside
the tomb, all members of the Kao ethnic group who died in a clash with Dutch
soldiers in the first decade of the twentieth century. The gravesite holds special
significance for Kaos. It is the resting place for both Christians and Muslims, a
symbol for the Kaos over the past century of their strong ethnic solidarity, regard-
less of religious differences. For most of the twentieth century this concord was
also representative of the North Maluku community as a whole. In 1999, however,
this society, which had long prided itself on inter-religious harmony, descended
into bloody religious war.
Devastating communal violence often begins with a series of events that in hind-
sight could easily have been contained. In August 1999 a small ethnic dispute
erupted in a village on the large island of Halmahera, to the east of Sulawesi,
marking the beginning of a series of clashes that brought horrific consequences to
the entire region. Throughout North Maluku, over 3,500 men, women and children
were killed by opposing mobs armed with machetes, spears and bows and arrows.
Several hundred thousand people were displaced from their homes, and the
fighting destroyed much of the region’s housing and infrastructure.
This book attempts to account for this violence. In particular it seeks to explain
five aspects of the conflict: why violence began; how it evolved from a small
dispute into a religious war; why it reached such a frightening level of intensity;
why it spread across the entire province; and why it ceased. This introductory
chapter begins with an overview of the violence and its consequences. The second
section gives an overview of the existing literature on the conflict.
Initiation – Malifut
All commentators on the conflict point to the fact that the first violence in North
Maluku, that in Malifut in August 1999, erupted just as the local government
approved a new sub-district in the area. However, most disagree on how and why
the formation of this new sub-district led to conflict. For some, the destruction that
took place in August and October was the culmination of growing tension between
the two local ethnic communities – the indigenous Kaos and the Makians, who had
been moved to the area by the local government two decades before. M. Kordi
writes that the economic success of the migrants relative to that of the Kaos caused
inequality, jealousy and inter-ethnic tension.8 The Indonesian sociologist and
native of North Maluku, Tamrin Tomagola, takes the long-term tensions argument
further, stating that the area of Malifut had become the centre of a struggle between
Christianity and Islam on Halmahera.9 According to Tomagola, Christians
believed that, in relocating the Makian community from Makian Island to Malifut
in 1975, the local district government had deliberately aimed to halt the southward
expansion of Christianity. According to Tomagola, this perception contributed to
the level of friction in 1999.10
Others claim that the creation of the new sub-district was in itself a sufficiently
contentious issue to provoke hostilities. The presence of a large goldmine in the area,
operated since 1997 by the Australian company Newcrest, has led many analysts to
conclude that economic competition played a crucial role.11 Most analysts argue that
the two communities fought for control of this resource and the Kaos eventually
destroyed Malifut as a means of eliminating competition.12 Indeed, the Ternate
academic, Smith Alhadar, ignores the initial riot in August, claiming that the first
violence was that in October, when the Kaos, jealous of the Makians for dominating
employment at the mine, attacked and destroyed Malifut.13 The North Malukan
Christian academic, Jan Nanere, asserts, however, that neither gold nor jealousy was
the primary contentious issue involved in the creation of the new sub-district. More
6 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
importantly, the new sub-district violated long-established ethnic boundaries
recognized by the indigenous Kaos. 14
Given that the first Malifut incident occurred while the North Maluku elite jock-
eyed for political power in the new province, most analysts see the initial outbreak
in Malifut, and the conflict in general, as connected to this wider political competi-
tion. Alhadar writes that ‘just as the administrative wheels began to turn in
mid-1999 to split off North Maluku as a province of its own, the conflict began to
escalate’, and that the ‘riots must be seen in the context of a government plan at the
time to hold local elections for a new provincial parliament in June 2000’.15 The
International Crisis Group also concludes that the ‘separation of North Maluku …
stimulated rivalry by creating the need to elect a new governor and this seems to
have been one of the driving factors behind the initial outbreak in Halmahera’.16
Nevertheless, most analysts disagree on how this political competition caused
violence on Halmahera, and which individuals were most culpable. Tomagola
claims that the conflict resulted in part from the increasingly desperate attempts of
the Sultan of Ternate to become governor of the new province.17 The Sultan faced
a strong challenge for the governorship from the District Head of Central
Halmahera, Bahar Andily, who, according to Tomagola, was assured of the
support of the majority of the Muslim community, which, according to Tomagola,
constituted 87 per cent of the provincial population. The Sultan, although a
Muslim, was largely considered to rely on Christian support. Tomagola relates that
the Sultan of Ternate sought to shore up this Christian support by promising Chris-
tians on Halmahera that the Makian migrants would be removed from Malifut, and
claims that this promise encouraged the Kaos to turn to violence when the new
sub-district was created in Malifut.18 Nanere also argues that the violence in
Malifut was provoked by members of the elite in Ternate. However, he does not
lay the blame on the Sultan of Ternate, pointing more to provocative statements by
the Mayor of Ternate and the head of the bureaucracy (Regional Secretary).19 He
does not make clear why these individuals sought to cause violence on Halmahera.
Several analysts have argued that political competition was made more volatile
by a revival of the long-standing rivalry between the two historic and powerful
sultanates of Ternate and Tidore, and that, in supporting the Kaos in their dispute
with the Makians, the Sultan of Ternate was thereby attempting to maintain
support in the sultanate’s traditional area of influence.20 The International Crisis
Group argued that ‘on the provincial level, seeds of conflict can be found in the
centuries-old political rivalry between the Sultans of Ternate and Tidore’.21
Alhadar agreed that ‘Tidore people began to worry that their traditional enemies
on Ternate were preparing to revive the cultural dominance they had enjoyed in the
past in order to justify a resurgence of their political power.’22
Because North Maluku was still part of Maluku Province in August 1999, most
analysts have seen the Malifut clash as a consequence of the inter-religious
violence that had gripped the provincial capital, Ambon, for most of that year.23
For example, the International Crisis Group reports that, after a resurgence of
conflict in Ambon, the violence then ‘spread in October to Malifut on Halmahera
Island’.24 Jacques Bertrand also claims that the conflict in North Maluku was a
Introduction 7
consequence of the ongoing violence in Maluku.25 Citing Tomagola, Bertrand
suggests that not only was Malifut the site of competition between Muslims and
Christians for control of Halmahera, but that Christians were concerned about the
success of Muslims in national and local politics.26 According to Bertrand, stories
of the violence in Ambon aggravated these tensions. He concludes that ‘it is not
coincidental that the violence erupted after months of conflict between Christians
and Muslims in other parts of the region’ and ‘thus local issues, while important,
provided the trigger and the filter through which tensions at the national and
regional level were expressed.’27
There is therefore a range of, often conflicting, explanations of the start of the
conflict. Despite these conclusions, a clear picture has not been provided as to why
the dispute had a violent, as opposed to a non-violent outcome. Under the process
of pemekaran (literally ‘blossoming’, but more appropriately ‘division’), the Indo-
nesian government has, since 1999, created a large number of new sub-districts
and districts and several provinces, but very few have descended into violence as a
result.28 It is not clear what lent this case such a highly affective character. Why did
violence become accepted as necessary and/or legitimate by large sections of each
community, when it had been largely absent from North Maluku before this
incident?
Did the creation of the new province of North Maluku, and the ensuing competi-
tion for political power, play a major role in stimulating violence, as most analysts
have suggested? It is not apparent how important, comparatively, were the polit-
ical changes occurring at the national and local levels. To what extent did several
decades of authoritarian rule lay the foundations for the violence in North Maluku
in 1999 to 2000? How important was the transition from an authoritarian to a
democratic political system in 1998 and 1999? For example, it is not clear whether
the military or other individuals or groups central to the New Order regime of Pres-
ident Suharto provoked violence in order to retain power, as has been suggested in
the case of conflicts in other areas of Indonesia. Answering these questions may
provide an answer to the question of why the violence occurred when it did.
The Kao–Makian relationship itself requires examination. Did the two commu-
nities have a history of antagonism and/or violence and if so for what reason? Did
inequality or other long-standing social, political and economic structures such as
segregation and prejudice create the conditions for violence? It is unclear how
important religion was in this incident that was to eventually ignite religious war in
the region. For example, it remains conjecture that Malifut had become the front
line in ongoing religious competition between the Protestant Church and Muslims
in North Maluku. In what way did the ongoing religious violence in nearby Ambon
(discussed in Chapter 2) contribute to the dispute?
The human agency involved in these riots has not yet been adequately uncov-
ered. Analysts have discussed the broader socio-political environment without
identifying the actions and motivations of those involved. The existing literature
on the conflict does not make clear why the Makians sought an autonomous
sub-district in Malifut and why the Kaos mobilized and resisted in such an emotive
manner. Were only local people involved in the initial incident, or were people
8 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
from outside the area present, and, if so, did they intentionally or otherwise
provoke violence? It remains uncertain whether district government officials
incited violence in Malifut or why they would have an interest in doing so, particu-
larly given that the area produced a large amount of revenue for the local
government.
I will argue in Chapter 3 that the initial violence in North Maluku was not
connected in any significant way to either competition for political power at the
provincial level or the conflict in Ambon and religious animosity. The violence
centred around two primary issues – the control of territory and government
partiality. Several theoretical frameworks are used in this analysis. The literature
on social movements, particularly that on counter-mobilization, explains how a
conflict might unfold when an under-represented community perceives its rights
or interests to have been undermined by the mobilization of a rival community
which has apparent government support.29 I will refer to Monica Toft and others to
elucidate why and how competition over territory can lead to violence, and the
theory of Donald Horowitz on the impact of invidious group comparisons.30 The
chapter highlights a weakness in the ‘economic causes of civil war’ or ‘greed’
thesis, and other models of conflict based on quantitative datasets.31 The analysis
demonstrates that, while lucrative natural resources may be present in a conflict
area, they are not necessarily central to the outbreak of violence. This illustrates the
danger in imputing too much weight to the presence of objective conditions for
conflict without allowing for the importance of subjective understandings and
human agency. Even in those cases with clear economic agendas, material consid-
erations alone do not to lead to violence, but only do so in combination with issues
more commonly classified as ‘grievance’.
Additional questions
Several other general questions will be addressed throughout the book. In partic-
ular, a further question concerns why the conflict was possible. In a state long char-
acterized as authoritarian in its response to security threats, why did national
security forces not manage to control the violence? This question is particularly
pertinent with regard to phases of the conflict during which small numbers of
rioters faced large numbers of armed security personnel, and particularly when the
latter possessed adequate intelligence that rioting was imminent. It is unclear
whether these forces lacked the necessary capacity or political will to deal effec-
tively with the riots. To what extent did national factors such as democratization
and the military’s loss of influence nationally explain their lack of resolve? It also
remains to be seen whether the security forces provoked, became complicit in, or
exploited the violence in North Maluku as commentators have claimed they did
elsewhere in Indonesia, and if so, for what reasons.
A further question considered throughout this study is what is known as the
‘free-rider’ dilemma.49 Why did individuals and communities across North
Maluku choose to risk their own death and the destruction of their property, espe-
cially when collective action by others was likely to provide benefits to them
even without their participation? Did coercion, financial incentives or other
factors play a role in their decisions to take part in the conflict? How important
were ethnic and religious loyalties in mobilizing people to risk their lives?
This book seeks to account for the bloodshed and destruction in North Maluku
from 1999 to 2000. It explores why violence broke out in a region which had seen
decades of peaceful coexistence between ethnic and religious communities. It also
seeks to explain the trajectory of the conflict: why it transformed from a local
dispute into religious violence; how and why the initial incident sparked death and
mayhem across an entire province; and, finally, why it ended as abruptly as it had
begun. Within these primary foci are several secondary, yet crucial questions. The
study examines what motivated those involved and how organized the violence
was. It asks whether religion and religious identity played a major role in the
violence. It seeks to explain how such devastation could happen in a state which
for generations had harshly prevented large-scale domestic disturbances, as well
as where responsibility lies for this tragedy.
This chapter outlines the analytical and methodological approach taken to
answering these questions. The analysis presented throughout this book is based
on two main considerations – the need to recognize first the complex interaction of
structural influences and human agency; and second the dynamism and geograph-
ical variation involved in violent conflict. A detailed account of a single case of
large-scale violent conflict requires an inclusive approach – one that recognizes
the mutually influential role of elite agency and socio-political conditions, and of
instrumentalism, emotion and identity, and that pays close attention to changes
over time and to local detail.
Synthesis
The section above identified two questions central to the study of conflict – how
important, comparatively, are elite leadership and mass-level factors in causing
conflict?; and are those involved in violence motivated by instrumental calculation
or emotional influences and identity factors? As discussed, to some extent two
debates have crystallized around these questions in the conflict literature. While
few theorists exclude the role of either elite instigation, group-level factors, instru-
mental calculation or emotion in violent conflict, many give strong causal prece-
dence to one form of phenomenon.47 Yet, as anyone who has approached the
inductive analysis of a single case of conflict will attest, theories based too strongly
on the role of either structures or autonomous actors fail to capture the complexity
of large-scale violence. Both conditions and human agency play some role in
leading to violent conflict.
Some violent events are clearly more organized than others. Yet giving over-
whelming analytical weight to either elite leadership or mass-level factors leads
to several deficiencies. Without detailing the human actions involved, intended
and unintended, it is difficult to explain why one situation of, for instance,
inequality or insecurity leads to violence while others do not. While influenced
by the surrounding context, it is the motives and actions of individuals and
groups that translate that situation into violent conflict. Perhaps more impor-
tantly, neglecting the human agency in the tragedy of violent conflict removes
accountability from the actors most responsible. Human agency is necessary to
translate structures into conflict. For example, political inequality may exist for
decades without causing violent conflict until the exploitation of that inequality
by certain actors stimulates a violent response. Yet denying the influence of
ideational, political and economic structures on the actions of individuals and
groups also precludes a complete understanding of a conflict. The provocations
of elites, or the violent actions of a small number of militants or criminals, are
The study of violent communal conflict 21
unlikely to cause large-scale conflict in the absence of material and ideational
structures of insecurity, injustice or prejudice.
This is not to attempt to undermine those theories outlined above. All have iden-
tified social mechanisms that undoubtedly shed light on conflict processes in a
range of cases. But the detailed analysis of any one conflict requires a more
synthetic approach that recognizes the mutually constitutive nature of elite agency
and structural conditions and instrumentalism and emotion.48
Members of the elite are as much a part of their societies and influenced by the
same prejudices, loyalties and other ideational and material structures as their
followers. There is no clear demarcation between society and the state. In Indo-
nesia, district and sub-district government officials, as well as national security
personnel, represent not only the state but also their own ethnic and religious
community. In addition, individuals from various levels of authority have a major
influence on conflicts, further confusing any neat demarcation between elites and
society.
In many conflicts, therefore, it is difficult to distinguish between leadership and
mass-level influences in the genesis and trajectory of violence. Indeed, as Paul
Brass, Donald Horowitz and others have demonstrated, many conflicts are best
understood as a combination of orchestration and chaos.49 Organized mobilization
often descends into a mélange of spontaneous acts, and, similarly, random acts of
violence often become more coordinated as influential individuals take charge.
Before and during violence, much takes place in this grey area between state and
society and between leadership and impulse. By investigating this area, and the
interaction between mass sentiment and elite leadership, a more complete under-
standing of events is possible. It also becomes possible to answer the question of
why people follow their leaders into violence.
Attempting to explain a conflict by reference to either rational interest or
emotional outburst alone is also problematic. Conflicts often involve a striking
complexity of issues. While Chaim Kaufman and others are correct in criticizing
a focus on pure instrumentalism for missing the ties and emotions of identity, it
must also be recognized that rational calculation does motivate some actions in
conflict. Yet other actions do seem simply to be the venting of rage, and have a
consummatory nature, being ends in themselves.
Any group will contain different sub-groups with varying identities and motives.
In most violent events, various sections of a crowd will have quite different motives
for participating, some affective in nature, others more interest-based. Certain
sub-groups will have a much greater attachment to the larger group identity than
others. Some may be acting with reference to the past (i.e. taking revenge for a past
affront) and others acting with a future goal in mind (i.e. to eradicate economic
competitors). In many cases, some individuals and groups will have known of plan-
ning behind a riot or clash, while others will believe they are part of a spontaneous
event. Finally, as discussed further below, as the riot or conflict goes on, new inter-
ests and emotions develop, and identities change and harden.
Further, the motivations of two opposing groups, both of which must be taken
into account when analyzing a conflict, are likely to involve different mixes of
22 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
rationality and emotion. Conflict is fundamentally the result of interaction, and two
opposing groups will almost certainly be driven by different motives. One indicator
of the maelstrom of issues usually involved in conflict situations is that members of
distinct communities and even different members of the same community often have
different conceptions of the real causes of the violence. Some members of one
community may claim that it was their economic marginalization that led to conflict,
while other members blame rising radicalism. Meanwhile, members of the opposing
community may point to entirely different causes, such as political rivalry.
Yet the analysis of a conflict cannot stop at ascertaining which actions are instru-
mental and which affectual. Individuals approach a conflict situation with mutually
reinforcing rational and ‘irrational’ motives. Case studies invariably demonstrate
that actors in a conflict situation simultaneously face a range of economic, political,
emotional and identity-related influences upon decision making. These influences
do not exist independently of each other but constantly reiterate or intensify the
importance of one other. For example, Anthony Regan writes that economic, polit-
ical and identity-related factors were ‘mutually reinforcing’ in motivating
Bougainvilleans in their separatist conflict with Papua New Guinea. While mining
revenue was important in this struggle for independence, these economic interests
cannot be separated from a political struggle stimulated by years of marginalization
and a sense of separate identity among the people of Bougainville.50
Nor in many cases is it feasible to give causal precedence to either form of moti-
vation. The direction of causation between the two phenomena is more
multi-directional than many theorists propose. Identities and passions constantly
shape interests and vice versa. It is therefore necessary to illustrate the ways in
which social conditions shape the identities, interests and actions of actors, the
manner in which their actions alter the surrounding structure and in turn how this
changed structure changes the interests, identities and interactions of actors. As
Horowitz writes, ‘an amalgam of apparently rational-purposive behaviour and
irrational-brutal behaviour forms the leitmotiv of the ethnic riot.’51
Several theorists have presented accounts of violent conflict that synthesize elite
agency and social structures. In a wide-ranging study on the connections between
the transition from authoritarianism to democracy, Jack Snyder concludes that
nationalist conflict is likely when elites feel threatened by democratization.52 In an
attempt to survive the democratic transition, elites appeal to ethnic solidarity and
mobilize followers through small networks and the state bureaucracy. However,
he also suggests some prevailing conditions that facilitate this elite instigation.
Exclusionary nationalism is likely to occur and succeed when economic develop-
ment is low, when citizens lack the skills for political participation and when
democratic institutions, such as political parties and a professional media, are
weak but the bureaucracy remains strong.53
In addition to recognizing the mutually constitutive role of elites and mass level
phenomena, it is also necessary to consider the interaction of emotional and
rational influences on both elites and masses. Badredine Arfi presents a strong
argument regarding the connection between the identities and interests of elites
and prevailing structures in the onset of violent conflict. He asserts that it is the
The study of violent communal conflict 23
rapid construction of a belligerent communal identity by elites that causes violent
conflict.54 Changes in social identities destabilize patterns of inter-ethnic relations.
It is identities that determine whether an actor seeks to reach a negotiated settle-
ment or risk conflict.55 Arfi argues that three social structures are important in the
construction of a belligerent social identity. Salient historical memories play an
important role in the definition of ethnic groups and the nature of inter-ethnic rela-
tions. The structure of ethnic cleavages, such as territorial distribution, reinforces
identities. State institutional arrangements constrain actors and empower those
with resources. While asserting that elites construct aggressive social identities,
crucially Arfi argues that ‘the above social structures are not just tools in the hands
of self serving elites but also constitute the agency of elites.’56 The ‘existence of
these social structures enables and constrains such a role.’57
Only by recognizing the importance and interplay of both elite agency and soci-
etal factors, as well as emotion, identity and interest, can the analyst answer several
central questions in the study of conflict: to what extent are those elites actually
creating or merely following mass-level sentiment?; why did they come to believe
that organizing violence was a profitable means of achieving their agendas?; and
why do members of society uncritically accept the provocations of their leaders?
This last question is particularly pertinent in those situations where involvement in
clashes holds a high risk of substantial cost and little likelihood of reward.
Anthony Lake has asserted that the question of why constituents follow their
leaders into violent conflict is the most central question in conflict study today.58
Therefore this study proceeds with the assumption that conflict must be under-
stood as the result of human agency, in many cases provocative and Machiavellian,
which both shapes and in turn is influenced by a range of mutually exacerbating
political, economic, emotional and identity-related factors. Conflict situations are
influenced at various levels spanning agency and structure – individual, sub-
communal, communal and inter-communal or structural.59 The individual level
involves the various personal interests, identities, emotions, psychology and preju-
dices that contribute to violent outcomes. The sub-communal level involves those
collectivities of actors such as paramilitary groups, militias, criminal networks,
ethnic or religious organisations, political factions and powerful economic actors.
These actors often pursue competing agendas and hold varying attitudes towards
neighbouring communities as well as ideas about the legitimacy, efficacy or neces-
sity of violence. Their actions invariably play a central role in rising tension and
the outbreak of violence. The communal level of analysis concerns the impact of
communal solidarity and community identity, as well as the threats to the commu-
nity that cause or escalate conflict. The structural level involves those systems and
patterns of political power, economic distribution and inter-communal relations
(and changes in those structures) that influence a social outcome. It is necessary to
examine the interplay between actions and patterns at all these levels.
Rather than disaggregating and studying separately the emotional and material
aspects of violence and the role of organization and spontaneity, as recommended
by some theorists,60 I believe a full explanation of a conflict will be found in the
interaction of these elements. What I am suggesting is an approach to the study of
24 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
conflict that best explains the devastation involved in a protracted conflict such as
that in North Maluku, as opposed to a single theory of conflict that synthesizes all
the factors described above. This approach allows us to witness how instrumental
and identity or affective motivations help set the stage for one another, and how
elites and other important actors and mass-level structures shape each other. In
providing a number of examples of these dynamics this approach holds wider rele-
vance for the study of conflict.
Conclusion
This study provides a more detailed explanation of the tragic events in North
Maluku than can be found elsewhere. It explores the conditions in the region
before the conflict and the causes of the initial violent incident. It also illustrates
how and why the violence rapidly evolved from a local border dispute into prov-
ince-wide religious conflict. The study critically evaluates prevailing assumptions
about the outbreak and trajectory of the violence.
I argue that it is crucial to analyze this conflict at four different levels, indi-
vidual, sub-communal, communal and structural. The study does not focus solely
on the political, economic or identity-related aspects of the conflict but seeks to
demonstrate the ways in which numerous agendas, concerns and relationships and,
crucially, human agency interacted to shape outcomes. I have divided the conflict
into phases to capture its temporal dynamism and geographical variation. My anal-
ysis of each phase sheds light on the trajectory of the conflict as well as salient
issues and agency. The examination of successive phases of the conflict, each with
distinct characteristics, allows the identification and use of the most relevant and
helpful theoretical concepts from the wider study of violence.
28 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
Chapter 2 examines the background to the conflict, including the history and
social structure of North Maluku since the fifteenth century and the major changes
that occurred in Indonesia and in the immediate region in the years immediately
prior to the conflict. The chapter discusses the history of inter-religious relations in
Indonesia and North Maluku more specifically, illustrating how tension had risen
over the previous two decades between Muslims and Christians. It discusses the
factors behind this development and covers the acceleration of inter-religious
violence across Indonesia, including the terrible carnage in Ambon which began in
January 1999.
2 North Maluku in context
Introduction
There are few more breathtaking sights than North Maluku from the air as your
plane begins its descent towards Ternate. A chain of small volcanic islands rises
sharply out of the water. The city of Ternate clings to the side of one of these volca-
noes, massive Halmahera lies to the east and Tidore broods opposite. Once the site of
intense international competition over the lucrative spice trade, its waters alive with
European gunships, this place then slumbered for centuries in relative anonymity. Its
ancient sultanates, once fierce rivals, fell redundant. The remote islands were rela-
tively untouched by the tumultuous events of Indonesian politics in the twentieth
century. But just before the turn of the millennium North Maluku once more rose to
prominence, yet again a scene of political competition and bloody rivalry.
In 1999, Indonesia was in a state of flux. The Asian financial crisis forced
millions into unemployment and poverty, triggering nation-wide protests. In turn,
the protests led to widespread demands for political reform, culminating in Presi-
dent Suharto’s resignation in May 1998. His replacement, B. J. Habibie, initiated a
process of democratization as well as decentralization of authority to the regions.
The Indonesian armed forces, beset by factionalism and poor operational capacity,
were not untouched by this turmoil, facing growing criticism and pressure to with-
draw from economic and political life.
While these national developments affected all regions of Indonesia, North
Maluku faced additional local changes. In early 1999, the central government in
Jakarta announced that two remote districts in northern Maluku Province were to
form a new and separate province. This stimulated competition among the region’s
elite for political power. Religious violence in Ambon City also influenced North
Maluku society. Many public servants, students and workers returned from
Ambon with horrific stories, and the entire community witnessed on television
religious violence on a scale unprecedented in Indonesia.
Irian Jaya) to the east and the southern Philippines to the north (see Map 1). For
several centuries, the area was the only source of a highly valued commodity on
the world market, the clove. Because of the wealth and influence afforded by trade
in this spice, several regional powers emerged in North Maluku, most notably
Ternate and Tidore, which exercised influence as far as Sulawesi, Papua and the
southern Philippines. However, the ‘Spice Islands’ as they became known, like
most areas possessing valuable resources, also became the site of competition and
turmoil, particularly after the arrival of European powers. North Maluku’s role in
the spice trade began to decline in the seventeenth century, after which the region
began a period of decline. The past few decades have nevertheless seen a moderate
upsurge in economic development.
Until October 1999, North Maluku was part of Maluku Province, governed
from the provincial capital, Ambon City. The region was divided into two districts
North Maluku in context 31
– North Maluku District and Central Halmahera District.1 The boundaries of the
two districts coincided approximately with the traditional spheres of influence of
the two most prominent sultanates – Ternate and Tidore. The main villages on the
small volcanic islands of Ternate and Tidore were also the district capitals: Ternate
City on Ternate, and the quiet village of Soasio on the eastern side of Tidore. North
Maluku District comprised Ternate, the northern half of Halmahera Island and a
number of islands, including Makian and Morotai. Central Halmahera District
comprised Tidore, Bacan and the southern half of Halmahera. In October, the
region became a province in its own right. Ternate City was declared the tempo-
rary provincial capital, while a small village in Central Halmahera District was to
become the permanent capital.
The North Maluku region is populated by a large number of related ethnic
groups, each closely associated with a particular area. According to local ethnolo-
gist Yusuf Abdurrahman, there are 30 ethnic communities with distinct
languages.2 The largest ethnic communities, according to official statistics, are the
Makians, Ternates and Tidores although other communities, such as the Tobelos,
form sizeable minorities. No one ethnic community numerically dominates the
region.3 The region is also the long-term home to a minority of Arabs, Chinese and
other migrants, as well as small numbers of Javanese who were settled in
Halmahera under the central government’s ‘transmigration’ programme.4
The region is demographically dominated by Muslims. Between 75 and 80 per
cent of the North Maluku population identify themselves as Muslim, the remaining
population (20–25 per cent) predominantly as Protestant Christian.5 Muslims
constitute the vast majority on most islands and sub-districts. This religious consti-
tution is reflected in the district parliaments, where Muslims greatly outnumber
Christians. Christianity is strongest in northern Halmahera, particularly in Kao and
Tobelo Sub-Districts, where Protestant Christians constitute large majorities, but
Christians also comprise sizeable minorities in Galela, Jailolo, Ibu, Bacan and
several other sub-districts. In Ternate, approximately 10 per cent of the population
was Christian before the violence in 1999, mostly migrants including Chinese
Indonesians, Ambonese, Minahasans and other ethnicities from elsewhere in Indo-
nesia. Chinese Christians are highly visible in the Ternate economy, so to some
extent religious and class differences coincided.6
This chapter discusses the above context to the outbreak of violence in North
Maluku in 1999. It discusses relevant aspects of the area’s early modern history –
the struggle between the main sultanates for power in the region and the develop-
ment of inter-religious relations. It then provides an overview of North Maluku
during the New Order period from 1966 until 1998, followed by the dramatic
changes that occurred in Indonesia from 1997 until 1999. Finally, the chapter
explores the inter-communal violence in Ambon and the quest by the Ternate elite
to create the nation’s newest province.
32 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
The spice islands
Rival sultanates
North Maluku’s distinctive and, in many ways, troubled history is to a great extent
due to the region’s wealth of valuable spices.7 Ternate, Tidore and Bacan, the
small volcanic islands along the western edge of the region, were home to the
clove, renowned among Chinese and European societies for its medicinal proper-
ties.8 Several other valuable spices, such as nutmeg and mace, grew on these and
other islands of North Maluku. By the fourteenth century, these spices were traded
along networks passing from North Maluku, through northern Java, Malacca,
Gujarat, the Persian Gulf and the Mediterranean. Based largely on this spice trade,
by the fourteenth century four powerful kingdoms had emerged in North Maluku –
Ternate, Tidore, Bacan and Jailolo. After a period of competition between these
four kingdoms, two eventually became predominant.9
By the sixteenth century, the rulers of Ternate and Tidore had established influ-
ence over relatively large areas. Ternate’s authority extended southward to Ambon
and more tenuously to North Sulawesi.10 Andaya writes that in the seventeenth
century Ternate exercised influence over and enjoyed a close and strongly hierar-
chical relationship with the alifuru or indigenous and animist inhabitants of
northern Halmahera.11 By the seventeenth century the populations of Kao, Tobelo,
Galela and other areas of Halmahera were forced to pay tribute to the sultanate in
the form of crops, pearls and labour, and provided personnel for the sultanate’s
military campaigns.12 Kaos, Tobelos and other Halmaheran peoples carried out
military service for the Sultan, in some cases fighting against the Dutch colonial
authorities (1679–81) and in others enlisted by the Dutch to fight against other
communities in the region, for example during the Pattimura rebellion in Ambon.
The Sultanate of Tidore exercised power over the southern half of Halmahera,
Bacan and as far as the Raja Ampat area on the western edge of Papua, where local
inhabitants paid tribute to the Sultan of Tidore and provided personnel for military
campaigns.
The two kingdoms competed for authority over the region and occasionally took
up arms against each other. Competition was focused on the island of Makian to
their south,13 the most populous island in the region and a productive source of
cloves. Makian was for a long time powerful in its own right, considered a fourth
North Malukan kingdom as well as the origin of the Bacan kingdom’s royal line.
The island gradually lost power to its two rivals to the north and many of Makian’s
inhabitants moved to neighbouring islands after periodic volcanic eruptions. 14
Competition between Ternate and Tidore became the accepted order for North
Malukans. Andaya noted that ‘As long as the two pillars remained, all was well
with Maluku.’15 Ternate was the more powerful of the two kingdoms, partly
because of that sultanate’s closer relationship with the Europeans and the greater
revenue it received from international trade. Yet its predominance did not go
unchallenged. As Haire writes, ‘Jailolo and Tidore tended to be the sources of
opposition and even revolt.’16 For many North Malukans, the collapse of Jailolo
North Maluku in context 33
and Bacan, and Ternate’s growing dominance over Tidore, had disrupted the
correct social order of the region.17 The colonial powers utilized and exacerbated
these regional rivalries. Almost all European powers who ventured into North
Maluku made alliances with one of the two main sultanates. In turn, the local king-
doms exploited the European presence in their own power struggle, fighting
several battles during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.18
From the latter part of the Dutch era, this competition between Ternate and
Tidore fell dormant. Both sultans declared loyalty to the Dutch administration,
which paid them each an annual stipend.19 Like Bacan and Jailolo, the sultanate of
Tidore eventually fell vacant during the twentieth century. It was co-opted by the
central government, although, as discussed below, it retained a great deal of
cultural influence and formal political power. As will be seen, this rivalry between
Ternate and Tidore re-emerged to some extent in 1999, both during efforts to
establish North Maluku as a separate province and during the communal conflict
that engulfed the region. Other social cleavages formed during the early modern
era also came to the fore in 1999. The following section discusses the introduction
of Islam and Christianity to North Maluku and the subsequent events that shaped
inter-religious relations.
Economy
During the first two decades of independence, North Maluku, as with most periph-
eral areas in Indonesia, received minimal developmental assistance.48 Little effort
was made to develop Maluku as a whole, and, located a great distance from the
capital Ambon, North Maluku fared worse than the rest of the province. Schools,
roads and most other infrastructure deteriorated during this period and the region
produced little in the way of exportable goods. The community was required to
import most commodities from Java and elsewhere.49
President Suharto’s New Order brought increased development to the region,
including improved roads, communications, ports and warehouses as well as a vast
increase in the number of educational institutions. Government infrastructure also
improved markedly under the New Order, with the construction of large district
and sub-district government buildings. The region became more integrated with
the rest of Indonesia with the opening of daily flights between Ternate and North
and South Sulawesi and Ambon, and the improvement of shipping services from
both Ternate and Tobelo. From a net importer of goods during the ‘Old Order’,
Maluku became in the 1980s, along with Irian Jaya (Papua), one of only two net
exporters among the eastern Indonesian provinces.50 As a result of the abundance
of local fish and agricultural products, by the mid-1980s poverty was low. 51
North Maluku’s economy is largely driven by the exploitation of the region’s abun-
dant timber resources. About three-quarters of the region is forested.52 Logs are
processed at the large Barito Pacific plywood factory at Sidangoli in Jailolo
Sub-District, which also serves as the main transit port between Halmahera and the
rest of the region. North Maluku is also rich in mineral resources, including nickel
deposits on Gebe Island and Halmahera. During the 1980s, Central Halmahera
district’s GDP was twice the Maluku provincial average, growing 10.7 per cent annu-
ally from 1975 to 1983.53 In June 1999, PT Nusa Halmahera Mineral (NHM), a joint
venture between the Australian company Newcrest Mining Ltd and the Indonesian
company PT Aneka Tambang, commenced an open-cut gold-mining operation at
Gosowong, about 40 km to the south-west of Malifut in northern Halmahera.54 With
350 local employees, NHM was the largest single employer in the immediate area.
The fishing industry is central to the North Maluku economy. Agricultural prod-
ucts provide a small income for many farmers and the bulk of the subsistence needs
of most villages. Copra production (dried coconut flesh for the production of oils)
is particularly important. In 1991, the Indonesian company PT Global Agronusa
Indonesia (GAI), in a joint venture with prominent American food corporation Del
Monte, established a 2,000 ha banana plantation in the north of Galela Sub-District
employing approximately 3,000 people.
Religion
Religious communities coexisted in North Maluku without major confrontation
before 1999. Inter-religious marriages were rare but did occur, particularly in areas
where ethnic ties cut across religious differences, as in Tobelo.62 Fights had broken
out intermittently over the previous decade in Ternate and in Tobelo and elsewhere
on Halmahera, often between Muslims and Christians, but most were not over reli-
gion, but rather over girlfriends, insults and similar issues. All older North
Malukans described relations between the two communities as good prior to 1999.
Respondents from both religious communities said inter-religious relations had
deteriorated in the decade prior to the conflict. Tobelo Christians suggested that
traditionally close ties with local Muslims began to deteriorate following the
in-migration of Muslims from Makian and Tidore who held more conservative
attitudes toward Islam and inter-religious relations. Christian Kiem asserts that
conservative ‘modernist’ Islam spread in some areas of North Maluku, particularly
Ternate, after the establishment of Islamic schools and foundations associated with
the national Islamic organization, Muhammadiyah. He claims young Muslims
increasingly opposed a perceived westernization of Indonesian society and the
continued participation by Muslims in pre-Islamic practices associated with local
traditional culture.63
In Ternate, this trend was strongest among migrants from Tidore, Halmahera,
Sulawesi and elsewhere. Their criticism of traditional practices generated tension
with the Sultan of Ternate’s supporters, who most commonly engaged in these
practices.64 But none of these tensions gave forewarning of the large-scale reli-
gious violence that would soon erupt in the region.
Democratization 1998
The economic crisis triggered massive protest and pressure for governance reform
from a wide range of civil society actors. Students led mass protests on the streets
of all major cities and, along with leaders of opposition parties, academics and
other leaders, called for President Suharto’s resignation and the withdrawal of the
military or TNI (Tentara Nasional Indonesia)69 from political and civilian life.
Facing overwhelming opposition and declining support, and with his health
failing, Suharto resigned on 21 May 1998, and was succeeded by his vice-presi-
dent, B. J. Habibie.
After assuming the presidency, Habibie scheduled national elections for June
1999. The government also removed the restriction on the number of political
parties allowed to contest elections, after which dozens of new parties were
formed. Competition for political power suddenly assumed an intensity unknown
for several decades. Opposition groups were presented with the political freedom
to criticize the old regime, and local communities with the ability to lobby for
changes, such as the recognition of indigenous rights. After centuries of almost
uninterrupted authoritarian rule, Indonesia was on the brink of democracy. 70
Decentralization
Democratization was accompanied by political and financial decentralization.
This process was an attempt to address regional grievances, particularly in places
that had experienced separatist rebellions, such as Aceh and Papua (Irian Jaya),
40 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
and to increase public participation in politics, government accountability and to
provide better health, infrastructure and other social services.71 Decentralization
was based on two laws signed by the president in May 1999 – Law 22/1999 on
Regional Government and Law 25/1999 on Fiscal Balance between the Centre and
the Regions. Law 22 devolved to the district level authority over all functions of
government except defence and security, international relations, justice, monetary
and fiscal affairs and religion. The law also gave local parliaments the power to
elect and dismiss their own district heads and provincial governors.
Law 25 established a new financial relationship between the centre and the
regions. The law left expenditure largely to the discretion of local governments,
and allowed them to collect taxation as long as there was no duplication of the
national tax regime. More importantly for many resource-rich districts, a large
percentage of revenue raised from local resources was to be returned to the region
of extraction, including the ‘producing’ district. A regulation accompanying Law
25 stated that 32 per cent of revenue from mining operations had to be returned to
the producing district.72
The legislation also allowed for the creation of new sub-districts, districts and
provinces through the process of pemekaran. Through pemekaran, the number of
districts in Indonesia rose from under 300 in 1999 to over 400 by 2001. The central
government also created several new provinces, including North Maluku, as
discussed in more detail below. Hence by mid-1999 Indonesia’s regions were
faced with a range of dramatic changes in political, social and economic life. The
changes associated with reformasi, as well as providing the foundations for far
greater political participation by civil society, also provided economic and polit-
ical opportunities for powerful individuals.
Conclusion
Historically, the remote ‘spice islands’ of North Maluku have long been a site of
competition and turmoil, not only between the ancient sultanates of Ternate and
Tidore, but also as pawns in the struggle between global powers for control over
their abundant aromatic spices. Relative stability as well as anonymity descended
on the region during the New Order period of President Suharto, allowing a certain
degree of economic growth. From 1997 to 1999, North Maluku, along with the rest
of Indonesia, went through a period of rapid and exciting change as Indonesia set
out on the path to democratization. The economic crisis did not affect North
Maluku in the way it affected Java and other areas. Yet other national changes, in
particular the decentralization of financial and political authority to the regions,
provided political and economic opportunities, particularly for the elite.
While this change was felt all across Indonesia, the North Maluku region faced
additional disruption. In 1999, inter-religious conflict broke out in Ambon City
and elsewhere in central Maluku. Yet local politics, specifically the push to make
North Maluku an independent province, were far more pertinent to the trajectory
of the North Maluku conflict than external religious influences. After several
months of lobbying, the central government announced that the region would be
inaugurated as a province in its own right. After decades of political appointments
from Ambon, North Maluku was suddenly presented not only with new-found
democracy but also with the political competition associated with elections for the
governorship. While the political elite was initially united in the quest to secede
from Maluku Province, it subsequently splintered into several competing political
factions. These factions reflected not only networks of political affiliation and
patronage but also, to some extent, ethnicity.
All of these issues served as background to the North Maluku conflict and many
of them influenced its trajectory and spread in one way or another. Yet the original
trigger for violence lay within the traditional and emotional heart of North Maluku
society. As we will see in the next chapter, the fighting began with a dispute over
that most emotive of resources – land – the control of which was brought into ques-
tion by the creation of a new sub-district in Malifut, North Halmahera.
3 Initiation – Malifut
Introduction
Many Makians did not want to leave their homeland of Makian Island when
government officials arrived in 1975. Despite increased seismic activity over the
preceding months, and the warnings that Kie Besi volcano was ready to erupt, the
people of Makian wanted to stay with their homes and gardens. Many believed that
the government was simply trying to move them to less crowded and unproductive
land. When officials began forcibly removing many families to Malifut on
Halmahera, this distrust turned to anger. Yet by the 1990s the Makians had
accepted they would remain in Malifut and sought to legitimate their permanence
in the area by having their new sub-district formally recognized. However, in
1999, just as they were about to achieve their goal, the Makians found their way
blocked by their neighbouring community, the Kaos.
The indigenous Kao ethnic community refused to accept a new sub-district for
migrants on what they considered to be their traditional land. The boundary of the
new sub-district cut through the Kao community, leaving some members in a
Makian-dominated sub-district. Goldmining operations in the area since 1998
added material incentive to this opposition. After the central government
mandated the new sub-district, rising tension between the Kaos and the Makians
culminated in a Makian attack on two Kao villages that refused to be incorporated.
Two months later, several thousand Kaos attacked Malifut, driving the entire
community from Halmahera. By 26 October 1999 Malifut had been completely
destroyed with only mosques and schools still standing.
This chapter seeks to explain why a territorial dispute became so emotive. It
concludes that the territory in question was simultaneously an economic, political
and identity issue in the Kao–Makian relationship. The land was not just an impor-
tant resource to the communities but also defined the way each perceived them-
selves in relation to the other. By 1999 land was the one remaining aspect of the
relationship over which the Kaos felt a source of pride and dominance vis-à-vis the
Makians. The biased and nepotistic response of the local government made this
issue more volatile. Despite the religious differences between the two communi-
ties and the fact the North Maluku conflict subsequently became religious in char-
acter, religion played little part in this initial incident.
50 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
In order to better understand the Kao–Makian riots this chapter begins with a
brief discussion of three bodies of theory: on the mobilization of social move-
ments, on the role of territory and on inter-group comparisons in conflict. The
chapter then discusses in detail the period before the first incident in August, and
the subsequent events leading up to the October attack. The final section then
analyzes why the creation of a new sub-district led to violence in Malifut, when
similar developments elsewhere in Indonesia passed peacefully.
Counter-mobilization
On May 26 1999, following the visit of Abdullah Assagaf to Jakarta, the Depart-
ment of Home Affairs in Jakarta released Government Regulation No. 42 (PP42),52
which legally recognized the Sub-District of Makian Daratan di Malifut. Several
people involved in pushing for PP42 suggested that officials in central government
departments in 1999 were very keen to support local programmes seen or
portrayed as being in the spirit of reformasi.53 However, the Kao community had
not been consulted since December 1998 about the creation of this new sub-district
within Kao.
The Kaos objected strongly when they first heard of the release of PP42 in May
1999. Their objections intensified when Kao community leaders became aware of
the new sub-district’s borders and the implications of the sub-district for their own
interests.54 Their objections were based on a number of factors, both identity-related
60 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
and resource-related. Makian di Malifut Sub-District included the entire area
covered under the Contract of Work (COW) held by NHM for mining on
Halmahera. Many Makians state that Kao officials, such as the sub-district head,
Mohtar Sangaji, provoked ordinary Kaos into opposing PP42 because these offi-
cials did not want to lose NHM funding.55 Kaos denied this, as did one Australian
employee of NHM.56 In fact, the Kaos denied that the mine was important in their
objections.57 Yet the mine cannot be discounted completely as a motivating factor.
The Kaos’ denial that the mine was important in their opposition to PP42 most
likely stemmed from a desire to emphasize cultural rather than economic motives,
the latter often seen in less sympathetic terms by the wider North Maluku commu-
nity. As the primary employer in the area, the mine was an important source of
livelihood for many ordinary Kaos, and it is reasonable to assume that many Kaos
would have seen the creation of a new Makian Sub-District as exacerbating the
unequal distribution of employment between Kaos and Makians.
However, issues of ownership of territory and the unity of the Kao ethnic group
were more important in these objections. The Kaos reiterated that the Makians had
moved to the area because of a natural disaster, not through an official transmigra-
tion programme. They were welcome as long as they respected Kao tradition
(adat).58 To the Kaos, this entailed the Makians recognizing that they lived on Kao
(especially Pagu) land. The Kaos argued that Makians who had moved to other
areas on Halmahera, such as Central Halmahera District and Ibu in northern
Halmahera, had not established new sub-districts.59 They also argued that Javanese
transmigrants relocated to Kao had not established new sub-districts.60
Kao objections to the name ‘Makian Daratan’ (Mainland Makian) were strongly
connected to the issue of land ownership. To the Kaos, the suggested name was a
violation of their traditional ownership of Kao territory. Many Kaos did not object
to the creation of a new sub-district in the area, as long as it was a division
(pemekaran) of Kao Sub-District, with its name reflecting this. Indeed, many Kao
community leaders told Makian leaders and government officials that they held no
objections to the creation of a new sub-district with the name ‘Kao Selatan’ (South
Kao) or ‘Pagu’.61 Makian leaders agreed to compromise by changing the name to
‘Makian di Malifut’ but refused to drop the word ‘Makian’ from the name,
because, according to one respondent, to do so would mean the Makians had been
effectively assimilated into an alien culture.62
Perhaps the most strongly articulated Kao objection to PP42 was that Makian di
Malifut Sub District would divide the Kao population. The boundary of the sub
district created by PP42 incorporated five Kao villages: Sosol, Wangeotak,
Balisosang, Gayok and Tabobo, meaning that a portion of the Kao community
would be separated from the majority in Kao Sub-District.63 The Kaos are very
proud of the integrity of the four sub-groups of their community and point to a long
history of these groups living and fighting together. A strong feeling of ethnic soli-
darity prevailed among both Christian and Muslim Kaos. This feeling of solidarity
was symbolized by a well-maintained grave in the centre of Kao village containing
Kaos from both religions, and also by the principle ‘hidup bersama, mati sekubur’
(live together, dead in one grave).64 According to local oral history, in 1904 the
Initiation – Malifut 61
Kaos travelled from Gosowong to the area of present-day Kao village to attack a
Dutch military base. In the clash between the Kaos and the Dutch army, seven
Kaos – four Christians and three Muslims – were killed. Following a consultation
between the community leaders of the various sub-ethnic groups and religious
leaders, the decision was made to bury the seven casualties in one grave.
Several Kao community leaders said cultural differences between the Kaos and
the Makians were so strong that it was not feasible for any Kaos to live in Makian
di Malifut Sub-District.65 As well as fearing that the Kao community would be
divided, many Kaos held concerns about being ‘controlled’ by a Makian-domi-
nated sub-district government. Villagers from Sosol and Wangeotak often
described the tensions surrounding PP42 by stating that the Makians ‘wanted to
control us, but we are the indigenous people of this land’.66 Therefore, both the
Kaos and the Makians had similar concerns about becoming subordinate to
another ethnic group.
There were two major Kao protests against the creation of Makian di Malifut
Sub-District. The Kaos protested outside the Kao and Malifut Sub-District govern-
ment offices in May after hearing of the release of PP42, and a delegation visited
the district head, Abdullah Assagaf, in Ternate in the same month. The primary
objection put to the district head was that the inhabitants of some villages included
in the new sub-district were Kaos and that this would undermine Kao unity and
land ownership.67 Assagaf told the Kaos that the creation of the sub-district was an
administrative issue, not an emotional one, and that they should accept the govern-
ment’s decision
As Kao protests mounted, pressure from some Makians also grew. The
Makayoa student group held demonstrations in Ternate to pressure the district
parliament not to accede to the Kaos protests and to inaugurate the new
sub-district. On 13 August several dozen members of the Makayoa organization
travelled to Malifut to bolster support among the Makian community for PP42 and
to pressure those Kao villages located within the new sub-district to accept the
regulation. When the Kaos voiced their objections, the Makayoa stated that a
government regulation had been released and that to change it the Kaos would
have to go to Jakarta, a task beyond most Kaos.68 When Kao leaders protested
about PP42 to the government in Ternate, Yunus Abbas, the first assistant to the
head of the bureaucracy, himself a Makian, also stated that the regulation was
already legally binding and it was too late to change.69
As the Kaos continued to refuse to accept PP42, the Makians assumed a more
belligerent and confrontational approach towards the Kaos. Many Makians, partic-
ularly the Makayoa student group, were angered that the Kaos were attempting to
prevent them from being officially recognized as the permanent residents of what
was, to their minds, government-owned land. By this time, a high proportion of
Makians were convinced that it was the inhabitants of Sosol, in particular, who
were resisting inclusion in Makian di Malifut Sub-District.70
Officials from the district government in Ternate, including Abdullah Assagaf,
asked Kao leaders to convince the Kao community to accept PP42. Those
approached included the local Protestant minister (pendeta), Pastor Salamena,
62 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
who refused to cooperate.71 When, because of continued Kao opposition, Assagaf
began to publicly express doubts that the situation in Malifut and Kao was condu-
cive to the inauguration of the new sub-district, the position of the Makayoa
student group in Malifut became more antagonistic.72
Government partiality
On Saturday 21 August the new district head of North Maluku, Rusli Andiaco, the
district head of police, Lt Col. Didik Prijandono, and the Sultan of Ternate,
Mudaffar Syah, travelled from the district capital, Ternate, to pacify the situation.
The sultan, at that time the chairman of the North Maluku District parliament, was
highly respected by the Kaos as a traditional leader.77 The delegation met with
community leaders from both Kao and Malifut. Kao leaders say they demanded
two things: that the government rebuild Sosol and Wangeotak and that PP42 be
cancelled. However, several more belligerent community leaders pressed for a
further demand, that the entire Makian community leave Malifut.78
The Sultan of Ternate managed to pacify the Kaos. He agreed with the Kaos that
the Makians had violated local traditions and that the four sub-ethnic groups of the
Kaos should not be separated. But he also insisted that the problem had to be
resolved through traditional forms of resolution, including meetings between
community leaders, and not through violence.79 As will be seen in later chapters,
different perceptions of the sultan’s response to the Kaos’ demands and to the 18
August riot were central to the development of violence later in 1999. Many
members of the Makian elite believe that the sultan told the Kaos that PP42 would
be cancelled and that he supported retaliatory action. They believe the Kaos there-
fore considered that they had permission to carry out further attacks against
Malifut.
Yet the Kaos initially attempted diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict, which
suggests that the sultan did not recommend retaliation. Kao community leaders
formed a delegation called the Team of Nine to make representations to the
government in Ternate.80 The Team of Nine made two trips to Ternate, the first to
meet with the Sultan of Ternate, the second to meet with members of the North
Maluku parliament. The delegation told the sultan that since the Makians had
violated hak adat (traditional rights) and destroyed the houses and churches of the
indigenous population, they had to leave Malifut.81 The sultan again ordered the
Kaos not to break tradition and told them they were forbidden to expel the
Makians.82
The Team of Nine’s second visit to Ternate in late September was to the district
parliament. The Kaos demanded the cancellation of PP42 and the rehabilitation of
64 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
Sosol and Wangeotak. According to one member of the Team of Nine, there was
already a feeling among some members of the district parliament that the rioting
was caused by religious animosity, a claim the Kao representatives strongly
denied.83 The members of the Team of Nine were also forced to refute an accusa-
tion from a member of the assembly that it was Muslim Kaos who had destroyed
churches in Sosol and Wangeotak, not the Makians. 84
Following the return of the Team of Nine in late August, the Kaos waited for
funding to reconstruct the two destroyed villages, while IDPs from those villages
lived in temporary accommodation in the capital. There was little response from
the district government, and neither the communities of Sosol and Wangeotak nor
the Kao Sub-District government received any funding for the reconstruction of
the villages. The government did not rescind PP42 nor was any investigation
carried out into the attack and no charges were laid against anyone involved.
There are several explanations for this lack of response from the district govern-
ment. It is likely that many officials were busy with preparations for the inaugura-
tion of the province, to take place on 12 October. In addition, the Team of Nine was
not particularly influential in Ternate, partly because there was only one Kao in the
district parliament. When compared to the political influence enjoyed by the
Makians in North Maluku, this weakness was all the more apparent. The Sultan
and the several Christian members of parliament from Halmahera were in a
substantial minority in the parliament and unable successfully to represent the
Kaos. Indeed, the Sultan of Ternate did little to press the Kaos claims in Ternate,
perhaps focusing more on his political campaign to become governor and
unwilling to jeopardize this campaign by becoming involved in the incident.
More importantly, most members of the parliament, especially Makian
members, believed that since PP42 was already authorized by the Department of
Home Affairs, the Kao community would therefore be forced to accept it. It
appears that they also felt that the Kaos were not in a position either to lobby
Jakarta directly to have PP42 cancelled or to retaliate for the destruction of Sosol
and Wangeotak. It is likely that Makians in Ternate, and the government in
general, considered that the military unit stationed on the north-eastern border of
Malifut was adequate to resist small attacks like those that had come from Kao
after the destruction of the two villages. There was clearly little foresight of the
events that were to come in Malifut.
Attachment to territory
But the rational element of this competition alone does not explain why the two
communities resorted to violence. For the Kaos, territory was not just a source of
economic livelihood in the form of copra crops and more recently gold, but was
also central to their sense of ethnic identity. The Kaos had all the connections with
territory identified by Toft: they had lived for centuries on the land; the territory
bore their name; and they had shed blood in their defence of their land. The bound-
aries of the new sub-district also threatened another important element of Kao
68 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
ethnic identity, the unity of all four sub-ethnic groups. The Kaos’ counter-mobili-
zation was therefore infused with emotion. It was nevertheless non-violent and
institutionalized in the first instance.
The issue of territory was also volatile in this case because it was central to the
inter-subjective understandings between the two communities. Control over the
territory of Malifut was the one advantage the Kaos still held over the more politi-
cally powerful and economically successful Makian migrants. While the Kaos
suffered from a lower level of development, education and representation in the
local government, their sense of deprivation stemming from this inferior position
had been assuaged by the knowledge that the Makians lived, as their guests, on
Kao land. This status was now at stake – a highly emotional issue for the Kaos. The
Kaos felt that the creation of a separate sub-district in Malifut violated their status
as the indigenous community of the area by reassigning ownership of their land
without their agreement, separating members of the Kao community and using the
name of a migrant group for the new sub-district. As such, in line with Horowitz’s
theory, perceptions of relative group worth played a central role in the violence in
Malifut.
For the Makians, too, territory was central to their understanding of their own
status relative to the Kaos. Many had become frustrated by uncertainty over their
right to live in Malifut and by the Kaos’ continuing claim that they lived on Kao
land. Many Makians, particularly the Makayoa student group, were angered that
the Kaos were attempting to prevent what was to them a long-overdue process: the
recognition of the Malifut community as the official owners of the territory on
which they had resided for 25 years.100 Their resentment was intensified by their
perception that the Kaos might prevent them from profiting from the lucrative gold
mine. The strength of these emotions led to a more belligerent response to Kao
opposition (especially by the Makayoa student group) and eventually the destruc-
tion of the two Kao villages that posed the greatest obstacle to the viability of the
new sub-district. Therefore, as in most, if not all, cases of communal conflict, the
interaction of both material and non-material factors increased the likelihood of
violence.
Government partiality
A further crucial factor in the riots in both August and October was government
partiality. The Malifut case strongly suggests that violence can become more likely
if both communities perceive the authorities to be biased in their treatment of the
dispute. In such cases, one party may feel aggrieved at the partiality of the authori-
ties, while the other may feel a sense of empowerment from the apparently assured
government support. In the Malifut case, violence was initiated by a group, the
Makian, which considered itself to have political and economic weight behind it.
In ignoring Kao concerns and finally in attacking Sosol and Wangeotak, the
Makians were motivated not just by economic interest and frustration at the uncer-
tain status of Malifut, but a sense that they could act with impunity because of the
backing of the district government.
Initiation – Malifut 69
A lack of government impartiality also partly explains the actions of the Kaos in
October. When the district government failed to respond to any of their demands
following the August riot, Kao perceptions of bias on the part of that government
increased. In line with Meyer and Staggenborg’s argument about counter-move-
ments, this prompted members of the Kao elite to employ a ‘non-institutionalized’
strategy to counter the success of their opponents – namely large-scale preparation
for conflict and eventually massive violent retaliation against Malifut. Therefore
the manner in which the sub-district was formed acted as a catalyst to transform the
tension concerning the territory into violence.
Religious sentiment
Given that the conflict in Ambon had been raging for seven months by August, it is
necessary to consider the role of religion in this first large violent incident in North
Maluku. There is little doubt that, for some among the Makayoa, the experience of
religious conflict in Ambon increased their antagonism towards the predominantly
Christian Kaos. For the Kao community, too, stories of the conflict in the south of
the province probably increased their suspicion of, and animosity towards, the
Makians throughout this period. Inter-religious tension was perhaps increased by
the presence of a small number of Ambonese IDPs in Kao.101 Shouts of ‘Allahu
Akbar’ from the Tahane mosque in Malifut and the destruction of the churches in
Sosol and Wangeotak demonstrated some degree of religious tension in the
Makian attack in August.
However, the evidence strongly suggests that religious sentiment or tension was
not the primary cause of either the August or the October attacks and motivated
only a minority of the individuals involved. The violence in Malifut can be seen as
the result of months of tension arising from the creation of the new sub-district in
Malifut. The initial dispute was related primarily to those factors addressed above:
ethnic solidarity and competition; the importance of traditional land to the Kaos;
and the Makians’ frustration at the refusal of the Kaos to recognize what they saw
as their rights. Illustrating the non-religious character of the conflict, Muslim and
Christian Kaos maintained ethnic solidarity in the face of what was ultimately
ethnic antagonism, Muslim Kaos joining in retaliatory attacks against the Muslim
Makians. No other Muslim or Christian ethnic groups assisted the Makians or
Kaos until members of the Makian elite subsequently reframed the conflict in
terms of religion, as discussed in the next chapter.102 Kao relations with other
Islamic communities in the area, including Javanese transmigrants, remained civil
throughout 1999 until religious violence elsewhere forced them to flee the
island.103
Agency
The actions of several influential individuals brought the emotional impact of
these macro conditions (ties to territory and government partiality) to the fore.
These actions translated the tension in the sub-district into violence. The presence
and rhetoric of the Makayoa student group in Malifut in August played a crucial
70 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
role in the attack on 18 August. Responsibility for the violence also lies with those
elites who mobilized students both to engender support among the Malifut
community and to intimidate the Kaos. Most respondents interviewed regarding
this mobilization claimed it was carried out by Yusuf Abdurrahman, the Makian
former rector of Khairun University. In pressing through PP42 without any
consultation of the Kaos and then ignoring and delegitimating Kao objections and
claims for compensation, many members of the district government paved the way
for the August and October riots. The leadership of Benny Bitjara was also crucial
in the latter event. His determination to launch forceful retaliation against the
Makians for violating traditional rights, and his charismatic leadership, played a
large part in preparing the Kaos for the October attack.
Conclusion
By the end of October all the villages that were to constitute the new sub-district of
Malifut lay in ruins. The Makians of Malifut were again IDPs, compelled to leave
this time not by force of nature or by government decree, but by overwhelming
physical assault. This chapter has asserted that what made the creation of a
sub-district in Malifut such a volatile issue was the importance of the territory in
question to all parties: it was simultaneously economically valuable; important to
the ethnic identity of one group; and a crucial element of the inter-subjective
understandings of the two communities. Government partiality exacerbated this
tension, as did the actions of several individuals among the Ternate elite.
The ethnic clash between the mainly Christian Kaos and Muslim Makians
subsequently sparked religious war throughout almost all areas of North Maluku,
as discussed in the following chapters. However, while the North Maluku conflict
became religious in character, this chapter has shown that it did not begin as such.
The initial conflict stemmed from local issues. For the Kaos in particular, the
dispute was ethnic in character, a fact underscored by the assistance given by
Muslim Kaos to Christians in the October attack on Malifut. As will be seen,
Muslim and Christian Kaos continued to maintain ethnic solidarity throughout the
subsequent inter-religious North Maluku conflict.104 Yet Christians still living
unaware in Ternate and Tidore were to become the next victims as the province
moved tragically towards religious war.
4 Escalation – Ternate and Tidore
Introduction
It was in Ternate and Tidore, North Maluku’s historic centres of political and
religious power, that the violence took a religious turn. For centuries, Christians
had enjoyed relative security in the regional capitals despite the islands’ strong
Islamic heritage. But in November 1999, in the wake of the Malifut conflict, they
appeared to be caught up in a wave of Muslim anger. Rioting mobs targeted
Christians regardless of ethnicity, and destroyed their homes and churches. The
violence in these two cities set off a wave of killing and destruction that engulfed
the entire province.
This chapter considers not only why violence spread to the two major provin-
cial centres, but how and why the conflict escalated from a border dispute
between ethnic groups into an inter-religious war involving all ethnic communi-
ties in the province.1 It examines the common claim that the riots were the inevi-
table result of a flood of IDPs from Malifut and the rumours that accompanied
them. It concludes that while the condition of these IDPs elicited sympathy from
Muslims in Ternate this was not the primary reason for the spread of violence to
the capital, nor for the dramatic emergence of religion as the primary marker in
the conflict.
By the time the violence had spread to Tidore and Ternate it displayed a marked
degree of organization. Members of the Makian elite portrayed the earlier clashes
in Malifut as religious in character so as to displace blame from their own commu-
nity for these events and to obtain sympathy from the wider Islamic community for
retaliation against the Kaos on Halmahera. When prevented by the security forces
from returning to launch retaliatory attacks, the group focused their attentions on
Christians on Tidore and Ternate. To make these attacks possible, powerful
members of the elite immobilized the only institutions capable of halting the
violence, the military (TNI) and police (Polri). In this, these elites found ready
allies among other high-ranking politicians with a different goal – to undermine
the daunting political support enjoyed by their political rival, the Sultan of Ternate.
The following section will outline several theoretical considerations of how
violence can escalate; the remainder of the chapter then describes and analyzes the
riots themselves.
72 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
Leadership and mass sentiment in the escalation of conflict
A central question in the study of violent conflict concerns the relationship
between elite leadership and mass-level sentiment and action. Is conflict most
often created from above, as a means of achieving the interests of political or
economic elites, or do interests and prejudices among, and the actions of, ordinary
community members constitute the predominant cause of violence? As the
following discussion on the escalation of violence and the case addressed in this
chapter demonstrate, this relationship is often complex. It indicates that, often,
neither can be considered in isolation from the influence of the other – leadership
and mass-level factors are invariably mutually constitutive.
The escalation of violence from a minor, non-sectarian dispute into widespread
communal conflict often appears to occur almost naturally. Even isolated criminal
acts or traffic accidents can eventually escalate into large-scale sectarian violence
when ethnic or religious sympathies attract large numbers to the dispute. Charles
Tilly asserts that when parties to a minor incident call on their friends and family to
support them, they can inadvertently redefine the situation as sectarian. Tilly terms
this process ‘network-based escalation’.2 Anonymous rumours often exaggerate
the extent of minor incidents and provoke anger and, ultimately, sectarian rioting.
These rumours, often combined with the movement of refugees and other manifes-
tations of the dispute, produce anger and feelings of insecurity, reduce the apparent
feasibility of peaceful solutions and legitimize militant actors within society.3
When escalation is viewed in this manner, an initial violent incident is seen as
spontaneously igniting the ‘dry grass’ of long-standing tensions between two or
more communal groups.
Reframing conflict
Yet, in many cases, escalation of a conflict is more intentional. In such cases, indi-
viduals deliberately portray an initial dispute as sectarian in nature as a means of
achieving some political or economic goal.4 In his study of communal violence in
South Asia, Stanley Tambiah shows how immediately before many cases of wide-
spread communal rioting, members of the political and economic elite had publicly
misrepresented previous interpersonal, business or other disputes.5 They had
removed any acknowledgement of the specific context and local character of inci-
dents, distorting them so that they ‘appeal to larger deeper, more emotive and
enduring loyalties and cleavages’.6 Tambiah terms this strategy ‘focalization’ and
‘transvaluation’.
Paul Brass agrees, pointing to the fact that incidents similar to those which
trigger communal rioting have occurred on numerous other occasions and passed
almost unnoticed. According to Brass, the difference in outcome depends on the
surrounding political context and who stands to gain and who to lose from rein-
terpreting or politicizing such events.7 Undoubtedly many cases of communal
rioting are a direct consequence of the propaganda efforts of members of the
elite. When elites exhort their followers to avenge murders committed within
places of worship, the brutal rape of women and other examples of inhumanity,
Escalation – Ternate and Tidore 73
they can provoke fury that is only assuaged by violence against the apparent
perpetrators.
However, in some cases it is possible to overstate the role of propaganda in
explaining why people engage in sectarian rioting. In fact, propaganda, particu-
larly when carried out anonymously, is sometimes used to make rioting appear
spontaneous when it was in fact planned and orchestrated. As stated above, Brass
demonstrates that communal riots are often preceded by a portrayal of everyday
incidents as sectarian in nature. However, he also makes clear that these riots are
often instigated and carried out by ‘riot specialists’. These ‘specialists’ are not
acting because they have been plied with, and believed, propaganda, but because
they have a direct interest in violence. In their review of six books on cases of
ethnic violence, James Fearon and David Laitin come to a similar conclusion.
They assert that the evidence suggests that in many cases where members of the
elite appear to have mobilized a form of ‘false consciousness’ in their followers in
order to get them to engage in violence, the masses were ‘not duped at all’. Rather
they have acted out of their own interests, ‘such as looting, land grabs, and
personal revenge’.8
Horowitz and other scholars demonstrate that once rioting has begun, larger
numbers of participants will subsequently join the violence, including a wider
section of the community with no direct involvement in preceding incidents.9
Many of these people become involved for a range of reasons, including excite-
ment, the opportunity to loot victims’ houses and a sense that the violence erupting
on the streets and the destruction of buildings confirm the content of recent propa-
ganda. Underlying this participation is a sense that they can take part with impu-
nity, having seen that the rioting is not prevented and no punishment is incurred by
participants.
The reaction of the security forces is therefore crucial to the onset and scale of
rioting. The response of the security forces to a particular outbreak of killing and
burning may be influenced by the prejudices of commanders or by less malign
factors, such as incapacity or incompetence. Yet in many other cases, their
response is directly tied to the interests of civilian leaders who exercise authority
over them. Tambiah has shown that in Trilokpuri, India, politicians mobilized
crowds for violence while simultaneously putting pressure on the security forces
in order to ‘immobilize’ them.10
Similarly, considering the incidence of inter-religious violence in India, Steven
Wilkinson concludes that parties whose platform is based on ethnic or religious
identity sometimes stimulate sectarian tension as a means of winning the votes of
members of their target community who would otherwise vote along lines other
than ethnic or religious affiliation.11 This is sometimes achieved through holding
marches or other activities that provoke counter-mobilization by members of the
other ethnic or religious community. Whether these local provocations lead to
violence depends on the electoral incentives of the party controlling the state
government. If the current government enjoys the support of the minority group at
risk or may need that group’s support in the future, it will almost always order the
security forces to prevent attacks against that group.12 If it does not require its
74 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
support but is at risk of losing an election to an opposition party that does, incum-
bent politicians will be far less likely to protect that community. Wilkinson states
that ‘abundant comparative evidence shows that large-scale ethnic rioting does not
take place where a state’s army or police force is ordered to stop it using all means
necessary’ but that the police and military will only intervene and halt violence if
ordered to do so by their civilian, political superiors. 13
Creating a mob
While sporadic attacks against Christians, and in particular Kaos and other
Halmaherans were taking place, there were also calculated efforts to mobilize
organized violence. The Makian IDPs were initially placed in the suburb of Dufa
Dufa, close to the sultan’s palace. Soon, however, several Makian community
leaders arrived to organize their transfer to the southern part of the city, an area
largely populated by Makians and Tidores. Over the following days, in areas such
as Bastiong and Mangga Dua (see Map 4.1), community leaders, imams and politi-
cians held closed meetings with IDPs and other Makians. During these meetings
these leaders made provocative speeches attempting to mobilize the audience to
take retaliatory action.38 A police intelligence officer present at one meeting in the
suburb of Mangga Dua claimed that Wahda Zainal Imam, the Makian member of
the Ternate Municipality Parliament from the Islamic United Development Party
(PPP), advocated a riot targeting not just Kaos but all Christians.39 Stories also
circulated throughout Ternate that a Christian militia, the Pasukan Merah, was
gathering on the slopes of the volcano that dominates most of the island.
As well as carrying out humanitarian work, the organization formed by Wahda
Zainal Imam also attempted to mobilize Muslim youth to join the Makians in
82 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
retaliatory attacks against Kao. One young Tidore man recounted how Makians,
including the local youth leader of this organization, put pressure on Tidores and
other Muslims to assist in their planned return to Halmahera.40 According to this
respondent, the young Makian man declared that if Muslims were not allowed to
leave and avenge the destruction of Malifut, Christians in Ternate would bear the
brunt of their anger. According to a number of sources, this experience of mobili-
zation was common throughout the southern part of Ternate in the last week of
October.
On 28 October several hundred Makians did indeed attempt to return to
Halmahera and attack Kao. Led by Wahda Zainal Imam, the group assembled near
the port on a street in the centre of the city. The crowd was armed with machetes,
spears and other weapons and wore white headbands (the first such use of an
Islamic symbol). A large contingent of military and police personnel prevented the
group from leaving and carried out a sweeping operation confiscating all weapons.
The district’s Deputy Chief of Police told Wahda Zainal Imam that the group
would not be allowed to depart for Halmahera. According to one Makian, Wahda
Zainal Imam then spoke in front of the crowd, proclaiming that the Kaos had
attacked the Makians in Malifut because of their faith and, along with other Chris-
tians throughout the region, were seeking to dominate north Halmahera. 41
Dispersed by the security forces, the crowd moved through the centre of the city
breaking the windows of (largely Chinese) Christian-owned shops and throwing
stones at the houses of Christians.42 The house of a Christian Tobelo community
leader, Yohannes Namotemo, was destroyed in this disturbance, he and his family
forced to run to the police compound. The crowd then proceeded to the suburb of
Kalumata in the southern part of Ternate City where they pelted the local
Protestant church with stones and set it on fire. Once again, security personnel
acted forcefully, halting the riot and arresting approximately 35 people, who were
taken into custody at the police headquarters.43
Makian community leaders had thereby successfully mobilized IDPs from
Malifut as well as Makians living in Ternate, drawing support from the almost
universal anger felt among the Makian community over the destruction of Malifut.
This anger led to attacks on Kaos in Ternate, on Christians, churches, houses and
shops, as well as an attempt to return to Halmahera in order to attack Kao. The
Makians involved in these incidents were not just IDPs or criminals, but included
students, bureaucrats and politicians. But, despite stories of the destruction of
mosques and the desecration of the Qur’an, few Muslims from other ethnic groups
had become involved.
Muslims from most other communities, particularly Ternates, considered the
Malifut conflict to have been ethnicity-based and the destruction of Malifut to have
been a backlash against the Makian’s attempts to monopolize natural resources in
North Halmahera. This lack of wider participation in the disturbances afflicting
Ternate meant that the security forces were able to prevent the Makians’ return to
Halmahera, preclude further rioting and minimize destruction.
For this reason, leading members of the Makian community now accelerated
their efforts to expand the conflict. Over the first few days of November they took
Escalation – Ternate and Tidore 83
steps to convince the wider Islamic community that the destruction of Malifut was
indeed of relevance to all Muslims. Simultaneously, and perhaps more importantly
(although not recognized in any existing literature on the conflict), they sought to
immobilize the security forces.
Anti-Christian rioting
Conclusion
Inter-religious relations in North Maluku have been changed, perhaps irrevocably,
by the events of early November 1999. The Christian minorities in Ternate and
Tidore were violently targeted, treated as scapegoats following a dispute in a
distant and remote area. The events were to lead to widespread and far more deadly
inter-religious violence across the new province, as innocent followers of both
religions were slaughtered. Most existing studies of the conflict explain the rioting
in the region’s two main cities as a spontaneous outburst of Muslim anger at anon-
ymous provocation in the form of the ‘Bloody Sosol’ letter. The analysis presented
in this chapter suggests that a far more malign explanation of these riots is
appropriate.
The November Tidore and Ternate riots were not a spontaneous response to the
Malifut violence or to the inflammatory letter that attempted to draw a link
between that violence and the local Christian Church. The rioting appears to have
been organized by local politicians and community and religious leaders. At
another higher level, high-ranking bureaucrats and politicians both allowed and
facilitated the rioting to occur for more political purposes.
Above all, the rioting in both cities was organized and started by Makians
who did not require further provocation. The influx of Makian refugees from
Halmahera into Ternate and elsewhere had a major emotional impact on many
members of the Makian elite. The vast majority of Muslims of other ethnic
groups in Ternate and Tidore, perhaps less susceptible to religious propaganda
than is often claimed, did not accept the assertions that the Malifut conflict called
for inter-religious animosity. While some subsequently joined the rioting, most
Muslims did not participate.
As demonstrated by the analysis above, leadership and mass action are not
entirely separate phenomena. Both elites and ordinary participants reacted to the
Escalation – Ternate and Tidore 95
statements and actions of the other. Both important elites and masses were moti-
vated by emotional/psychological factors as well as by rational interest. What
made the rioting possible was a convergence of interests between those who
sought revenge for Malifut and political elites who sought to unify Muslim polit-
ical support against the Sultan of Ternate. A coalition of these individuals then
pressured the security forces to refrain from action as the sultan’s political
supporters were targeted. Despite their relatively small numbers, the rioters were
able to freely target Christians and their property and face no sanction because
police and military commanders were hesitant to act against the supporters of the
potential future provincial power holders.
Within two months, almost the entire province was engulfed in religious
violence. As will be seen in the next chapter, this violence, often far more brutal
and extensive than that which had preceded it, was in large part a consequence of
the riots in Ternate and Tidore. That violence and the targeting of innocent
Christians on those islands caused intense anger and distrust across the province.
The scapegoating of Christians because of a clash in a remote area of North
Maluku, and for political purposes, escalated a small dispute into province-wide
religious war.
5 Dispersion – Tobelo and Galela
Introduction
Since the sixteenth century, Islam and Christianity have converged in north
Halmahera. While North Maluku has long been strongly Islamic, in this one corner
of the region the two great faiths coincided and their members mixed in relatively
even numbers. The palm-tree-lined coastal road from Galela to Tobelo passes
through neighbouring Muslim and Christian villages as well as those where
members of both faiths have lived side by side for over a century. In Tobelo and
Galela, peaceful coexistence between Christians and Muslims, enshrined in the
local cultural tradition of Hibua Lamo, had always been a source of pride. When
violence wracked much of the region in late 1999, Tobelos were sure provocateurs
would try and undermine this harmony. They knew that ‘if they make Tobelos
fight, the rest of North Maluku will follow.’1
Most people in North Maluku saw the Malifut conflict between Kaos and
Makians as a local issue, a dispute over territorial borders and the control of
natural resources. For this reason, they deemed it unlikely that violence would
spread to other areas in the region. However, after the anti-Christian rioting in
Tidore and Ternate, and attacks on Christian communities in several villages in
Central Halmahera, the violence assumed a religious character that appeared
relevant to the entire North Maluku community. Christians, particularly those in
north Halmahera, believed that the Makian community had targeted defenceless
Christians to avenge their failed attempt to take control of valuable Kao land in
Malifut. Muslims also began to feel concerned at this rising sentiment and to take
defensive precautions, including making weaponry.
This chapter analyzes how and why violence spread throughout the new province
by considering in detail the events in the adjacent sub-districts of Tobelo and Galela
in north Halmahera. I will argue that two factors – security concerns and religious
animosity – in large part caused the bloodshed to spread to these areas. The sight of
Christians fleeing to Tobelo and accounts of the murder of a pastor and the destruc-
tion of churches spurred anti-Muslim sentiment. Rising tension meant that fear and
anger increased within both communities. Unsurprisingly, after the nature of the
violence in Tidore and Ternate, many members of both communities in Tobelo and
Galela began to assert their religious identity in a more belligerent manner.
Dispersion – Tobelo and Galela 97
To help explain how such concerns can bring individuals and groups to
commit violence, the chapter first presents two general explanations for the
outbreak of communal violence: the (physical) security dilemma and societal
security dilemma. It will then describe the events leading up to the violence in
late December 1999 and the clashes themselves. The final section draws some
conclusions on how and why two sub-districts with such a long history of
inter-religious harmony could descend into violence. While emphasizing the
importance of insecurity, in my analysis of these events I attempt to move away
from an apolitical focus on the impact of this tension alone and reveal the human
agency that was crucial to the violence.
Tobelo
Tobelo Sub-District (split in 2000 into Tobelo and South Tobelo Sub-Districts)
stretches from Galela in the north to Kao in the south (see Map 5.1). The
sub-district is primarily rural, with most farmers growing coconut for the produc-
tion of copra. There is one major road that runs from the port of Sidangoli in Jailolo
Sub-District (the main entry point to Halmahera) along the coast through Kao to
Tobelo, and then on to Soasio, Galela. The city of Tobelo is the main centre for the
north Halmahera region and the export hub for copra and other commodities. The
city is now the capital of the new North Halmahera District, formalized with
district elections in 2004.
In 1999, the population of Tobelo Sub-District was 55,046 and lived predomi-
nantly along the coast.23 The majority of the population is of the Tobelo ethnic
group, closely related to the other ethnic groups in north Halmahera, including the
Map 6 Tobelo
Dispersion – Tobelo and Galela 101
Kao and Galela.24 The majority of Tobelos, and the population of Tobelo
Sub-District, are Protestant Christians. While the Dutch Reformed Church mission
was first established at the inland Galela village of Duma,25 Tobelo City is now the
centre of the Evangelical Protestant Church on Halmahera (GMIH), and the loca-
tion of the Christian Theology College (Sekolah Tinggi Teologi – STT). There is
also a small, mostly migrant Catholic population in Tobelo City. Protestant Chris-
tians comprise the majorities of most villages in the sub-district, particularly those
located on the road between Tobelo and Kao.
A substantial minority of the Tobelo ethnic group is Muslim. For the decade
before the conflict, Muslims constituted the majority in the sub-district capital,
Tobelo City. In 1999 the city was also home to several thousand Muslim migrants
from the Tidore, Makian and Bugis ethnic groups, many of whom were successful
small traders and shop owners. Large communities of Muslims were also located
in the villages of Gorua, 5 km north of Tobelo City, and Togoliua, approximately
30 km to the south of the city.26 Muslims also comprised small proportions of some
villages, such as Gamhoku. Several thousand government-sponsored
transmigrants, mostly Muslims from East Java, also lived in the sub-district, the
largest community located adjacent to the village of Togoliua.
Family connections between Protestant and Muslim Tobelos are very close.
Almost all Tobelos interviewed claimed that they have a parent, uncle, grand-
mother or other relative of a different religion. Members of the same extended
family often celebrated Christmas, Easter, Idul Fitri and Idul Adha with each other,
eating in the houses of the family members celebrating the event. Muslims would
assist neighbouring Christian communities in constructing new churches and
Christians would provide labour for the erection of new mosques. These connec-
tions have been formalized in a cultural structure known as Hibua Lamo. Hibua
Lamo is considered similar to the Pela Gandong cultural system in Ambon and
central Maluku, which binds Christian and Muslim villages in a pact of mutual
assistance and non-aggression.27 One Muslim Tobelo proclaimed that Hibua Lamo
was stronger than Pela Gandong as it was built on ‘blood’ or family ties.28
told me the events in Ambon reconfirmed to them what they had perceived as a
persecution of Christians throughout Indonesia, citing examples such as the
destruction of churches in Java, repression in East Timor and the riot in Ketapang
in Jakarta. They recounted that a consensus had developed among many in the
Christian community in Tobelo that if ‘they [meaning mainly Muslims, but also
the government or the TNI] try that here, we will not step back’.34 Similar senti-
ments were prevalent among the Islamic community, who viewed the Ambon
conflict as caused by aggression by Christians and particularly by the RMS sepa-
ratist organization based in Ambon in the 1950s. 35
The atmosphere in Tobelo became slightly tenser following a clash in June 1999
in the sub-district of Ibu on the western side of the north Halmahera peninsula.
This area is close to Tobelo both geographically and ethnically. A fight between
youths from the Christian village of Bataka and the Muslim village of Talaga left
several people dead. My interviews with people involved suggested the clash was
sparked by a dispute between youths over suspected criminal activity. However,
Christians in Tobelo considered it an example of Muslim aggression towards the
Christian minority.36 The 18 August destruction of the Kao villages of Sosol and
Wangeotak by Makians angered Christians in Tobelo, yet both Muslims and
Christians considered the dispute to be ethnically-based, with a very local scope,
concerning a sub-district boundary. The lack of response from the district govern-
ment in Ternate to the Kaos’ demands confirmed Christians’ perception that
Makians dominated the government and supported the interests of their co-ethnics
at the expense of other groups. But relations between Christians and Muslims in
Tobelo remained peaceful. While the Kaos’ subsequent destruction of Malifut on
October 25, and the expulsion of the Makians, was still largely considered a local
104 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
problem not relevant to Tobelo, many Muslims considered it a rather threatening
development. Makians in particular were concerned at the events and the subse-
quent intimidation they faced from Kaos as they travelled to Ternate.
Violence in Tobelo
On 26 December a group of Muslim youths threw stones at the house of a retired
Christian Ambonese police officer, Chris Maitimu, in the western part of Gosoma
behind the major sports field in Tobelo City, Lapangan Kariangan. When Maitimu
came out of his house and accused the youths, a crowd gathered and threw stones
at Muslim houses. According to a Christian respondent, a crowd of approximately
80 Muslim men then attacked a Christian neighbourhood guard post in Gosoma.
Within an hour, hundreds of Christian and Muslim men were fighting on the street
with swords, machetes and homemade bazookas, and, according to some accounts,
wearing white and red headbands. Although Muslims blockaded the main
southern entry into Tobelo, several dozen Christian militia members were able to
enter the city via a road through gardens into the area of Gosoma. There were
several casualties from both communities in these initial clashes.
In the early morning of 27 December Christians fought running battles with
Muslims between Gosoma and the monument on Tugu Street. At around 9.30 a.m.,
Muslims set fire to the Pentecostal church, and by 10.30 a.m. had pushed the
Gosoma Christians back and were attacking Gosoma church, the main church in
the south-west of the city. Several witnesses stated that a local (Tobelo) Muslim
military officer named Hatalah joined this attack and shot dead Wanto Hohakay,
one of the local Christian men defending the church. 46
By mid-morning, Muslims controlled the central area of Tobelo.47 Those Chris-
tians who remained in the city were confined to the suburbs surrounding the centre
of the city such as Gura and southern Gosoma. Many also fled through the forest to
Christian villages to the south. Some Christians, mostly Chinese shop owners, fled
Dispersion – Tobelo and Galela 109
to the military base (Kompi) on the northern edge of the city. Several shop ruins in
the centre of the city still bear the message ‘Muslim’ from this period, painted by
their Muslim owners seeking to prevent the destruction of their premises.
During this period the city’s infrastructure was relatively untouched by the
violence. Muslims did not destroy shops owned by Christians in the central city
they now controlled. One exception was a complex of five houses near the offices
of the sub-district government which were burned to the ground. These houses
were almost all occupied by current and former civil servants of Ambonese
ethnicity, including the former sub-district head, Mr Huwae. Local Muslim men I
interviewed, when questioned as to why they targeted those houses, claimed the
residents were ‘RMS’ (Republic of South Maluku) Christian separatists. While
Muslims alleged that the RMS was present in North Maluku and in Tobelo in 1999,
there is little evidence to support this claim. Prior to September 1999, while North
Maluku remained part of Maluku Province, many officials in the local Tobelo
government were appointed by the provincial government in Ambon. Many of
these officials, often of Ambonese ethnicity, were still in their positions after the
creation of North Maluku Province and many others, like Mr Huwae, had retired
but remained in Tobelo City. On this occasion, being of Ambonese ethnicity was
apparently enough to raise suspicion and animosity.
On the morning of 27 December, as violence continued in Tobelo City,
clashes erupted to the north of the city in two large neighbouring villages with
Muslim majorities, Gorua and Popilo (see Map 5.1). After violence started in
the city on the evening of 26 December, Muslim leaders in Gorua offered to
guard the church, an offer that local Christians refused. The following
morning, Muslims attacked the Christians guarding the church. Because the
church and most Christian houses were located at the southern end of Gorua,
Christians were able to safely reach Tobelo City and the village of Wari on the
city’s northern edge. Muslims in Gorua destroyed the church and all Christian
houses after the Christians had fled. Their escape, and the lack of casualties,
suggests the attack was carried out to expel the Christian community rather
than kill them. Over the next few days, clashes occurred between Muslims from
Gorua and Christians from Wari.
In the adjacent village of Popilo, Muslims also appear to have launched a
pre-emptive attack. According to the Christian pastor in Popilo, the Muslim village
head arrived and reassured local Christians that Muslims would not attack them,
and they would therefore not require assistance from the neighbouring Christian
village of Ruko to guard their church. However, soon after that meeting, Muslims
did attack the Christian area of the village and destroyed the church. Christians
believe Muslims assured them only in order to ensure that they (Christians) were
unprepared for conflict. However, my interviews with the village head and other
Muslim leaders make it seem likely that the assurances had been genuine but that
the attack had been launched by a group of more aggressive men from the village.
The fact that the entire Christian community from Popilo reached Tobelo safely
also suggests that, as in Gorua, there was no intention to kill them but only to drive
the community from the village.
110 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
During the night of 26 December several senior Christian community leaders
telephoned Benny Bitjara in Kupa Kupa and other Christian militia leaders in the
major villages south of Tobelo City.48 That night, and the following morning,
Benny Bitjara, along with Hersen Tinangon in Pediwang, mobilized thousands of
Christian Kaos to travel to the city. The thousands of Kao militia members had
maintained a high degree of readiness for conflict since their attack against Malifut
in October, with machetes, spears, bows and arrows and sulphur bombs. While
Muslim Kaos wished to join the Christians in their attack, the militia leadership
refused this request.49 Christians referred to this militia as the Pasukan Merah (Red
Troops).
As it travelled north, the militia was forced to pass through the large Muslim
village of Togoliua, about 30 km to the south of Tobelo City. The 1,365-strong
population of the village is Muslim, primarily of the Tobelo ethnic group. Upon
reaching Togoliua, the Christian militia was blocked by coconut trees that the local
villagers had laid across the road in an effort to prevent the militia from reaching
Tobelo.50 This forced Benny Bitjara and the Kao militia to board boats in the
village of Kusuri and travel around Togoliua, rejoining the road to Tobelo City.
Togoliua Muslims explained their actions by stating that they had family in Tobelo
and they attempted to block the road in order to prevent the Kaos travelling there
and engaging in what would inevitably become a one-sided massacre. They argued
that when Malifut was destroyed in October, they and other Tobelo Muslims had
not travelled there to assist the Muslim Makians. Nonetheless, Bitjara arranged
with the villagers of Kusuri to attack Togoliua once Christians had regained
control of Tobelo City.
Muslims in the mixed village of Gamhoku also attempted to block the road
laying large rocks across the road to prevent the militia’s trucks from passing
through.51 However, Christian community leaders persuaded the Muslims to clear
the road of rocks, reassuring them that nobody from Gamhoku would travel to join
the violence in Tobelo and they would protect them from the Pasukan Merah. As
the Christian militia travelled through Gamhoku towards Tobelo on the evening of
the 26 and 27 December, members of the Christian community did indeed protect
local Muslims by standing in front of the mosque as the Muslim community shel-
tered inside.
A Christian community leader, Sakeus Odara, led hundreds of Christian men
from the village of Tobe towards Tobelo City in vans and other vehicles,
destroying several mosques and the houses of Muslims in the villages along the
road. The militia killed members of the Muslim minorities in these predominately
Christian villages, with the exception of Gamhoku where local Christians
protected the small Muslim community. Odara stated to me that it did not matter if
the Muslims they met were Tobelos, Makians or Javanese, he ‘did not choose’.52
On the evening of 27 December, this militia gathered in the church in Pitu
village on the southern border of Tobelo City which was dominated by Muslims.
The militia included men from Pediwang and other villages in Kao and almost all
men from the villages south of Tobelo. A Protestant Pastor led the militia in a reli-
gious ceremony and blessed the militia’s weapons inside the church.
Dispersion – Tobelo and Galela 111
That evening, as the militia prepared for night in the grounds of the village
church, with smoke from the fires of Tobelo City clearly visible against the night
sky, Benny Bitjara walked among his troops holding a bible. To the excitement of
the men waiting for battle, Bitjara informed them that Jesus had appeared before
him and commanded him to read Psalm 91 to his troops, which he duly did. An
excerpt from the psalm follows.53
According to Bitjara the message from Jesus to his troops was that the
following day, when they entered the city, it would not be they who would be
doing the fighting, but angels.54 The troops then slept in and around the small
Pitu church.
112 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
At 5.30 a.m. the following morning the Pasukan Merah attacked Tobelo City.
The majority of the militia approached and overran a Muslim blockade at
Kaliseratus on the southern edge of the city, while hundreds of other militia moved
through the area of Kampung Baru in the south-east of the city, destroying large
numbers of houses and a mosque.55 Muslims fled, hid in the dim light or were cut
down by the advancing Christians. The militia used sulphur bombs in the attack,
which both terrified Muslim crowds into running and almost completely destroyed
any buildings into which they were thrown. Throughout that morning, Muslims
ran from the central city as the thousands of Christians moved in.
By around 10 a.m. on 28 December the majority of Muslims remaining in the
city withdrew to the largest mosque in Tobelo, Mesjid Raya. Military personnel
from the base in the north of the city surrounded the mosque and held back the
Christian militia. Muslims also sought shelter in a smaller mosque several hundred
metres from Mesjid Raya where they too were protected by military personnel.
Muslims from the suburb of Gosoma also sought protection in the sub-district mili-
tary and police compounds (Koramil and Polsek). When the Pasukan Merah
demanded that a group of about 15 men, women and children sheltering in the
small military compound be handed over to them, the predominantly Christian
soldiers fled. According to witnesses, lacking firearms, the military personnel had
little choice but to hand over the group.56 As the Muslims attempted to run from the
building, the Christian militia killed them with spears.
The thousands of Christian militia then controlling the city, many of them from
outside Tobelo, began to destroy all Muslim houses and loot the shops along the
main street of Tobelo.57 Many shops, including some owned by Christians, were
destroyed during the chaos and looting in this period. Some Christian shop owners
I spoke to said they did not blame the militia, as the goods they took were just
reward for expelling Muslims from the city.58 As Christians returned to their
homes, they began to mark their houses with crosses to prevent their destruction.
Approximately 100 Muslims died in the attack on the city by the Pasukan
Merah. Many of their bodies were burned in the street. One particularly large pile
of corpses was burned in the middle of Jalan Pelabuhan near the port.59 On the
afternoon of 28 December the military evacuated the Muslims remaining in the
city’s mosques to the military base on the northern edge of the city. As these
Muslims entered the base, Christians already sheltering there left and returned to
the city. One Christian woman recounted how the return to the city was terrifying
even for Christians, as the Christian militia was looting and burning shops and
intimidating those attempting to return to their businesses. She said she witnessed
militia stop a vanload of Muslims trying to flee the city and burn the vehicle
without allowing the passengers to get out. Upon the evacuation of the Muslims
sheltering in Mesjid Raya, Christian militia entered and destroyed the building.
Following the expulsion of all Muslims from Tobelo, a pastor ‘baptized’ Benny
Bitjara as panglima or commander of the North Maluku Christian militia.
Dispersion – Tobelo and Galela 113
Attacks on remaining Muslim villages
Having expelled all Muslims from Tobelo to the military base or northwards to
Galela Sub-District, leaders of the Pasukan Merah met in the Elim church in the
suburb of Gura in the north of the city on the evening of 28 December. They were
joined by Christian religious and community leaders. As well as being a religious
service to celebrate their control of Tobelo, the meeting was called to discuss what
to do about several large Muslim villages to the north and south of Tobelo. A large
Muslim community remained in the two adjacent villages of Gorua and Popilo, 10
km to the north of Tobelo. As discussed above, the two villages had already experi-
enced rioting on 27 December. Approximately 30 km to the south was the Muslim
village of Togoliua, where villagers had attempted to block the Christian militia
arriving from Kao.
The leaders of the Christian community, including pastors, local politicians and
militia leaders, decided to attack these three villages. This decision was taken for
several reasons. First, most Christians from Tobelo and Kao were angry that
Muslims in Gorua and Popilo had attacked the Christian minority and destroyed
the churches in those villages. Christians in Tobelo considered the Muslims in
Gorua in particular to be ‘fanatic’ with regard to their religion and in their relations
with Christians. The presence of Christian IDPs from those two villages among the
militia undoubtedly exacerbated this anger. Similar sentiment was felt regarding
Togoliua. Christians believed that in the attempt to block the Christian militia,
Muslims in the village had shown themselves to be part of a Muslim plan to isolate
Tobelo City from Christians in Kao.
Second, Christians were concerned that after the Pasukan Merah had returned
to their homes, Tobelo would once again be vulnerable to attack from these
Muslim villages. A large portion of the Christian militia was from Kao, south of
Togoliua. In addition, it was believed that the vast majority of the military
personnel that would inevitably arrive from Ternate or elsewhere to reinforce local
contingents would be Muslim and would assist these villages in attacking Tobelo.
With many members of the militia preparing to return to their homes and with their
arsenal of bombs and other weapons becoming dangerously low, Christian militia
leaders, pastors and other community leaders decided to take swift and devastating
action against the villages.
On 29 December several thousand Christian militia members travelled in trucks
towards Gorua from Tobe village, according to several respondents led by Sakeus
Odara. To avoid the military base, which had blocked the road north, the group
drove through gardens to the north-west of Tobelo. Men from both Gorua and
Popilo held out against the onslaught for approximately an hour before being
overrun. According to several respondents, the scene in Gorua was chaotic.
Respondents from both sides of the conflict said the Christians committed atroci-
ties during the attack, including the extraction and eating of hearts and other body
parts. Photographs taken by military personnel following the attacks confirm that
corpses were disembowelled during the violence. Several Christians claimed these
acts were a reversion to what they termed pre-Christian practices.60 Around 90
114 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
people (almost exclusively Muslim) were killed in Gorua and the entire village
was burned. As the Pasukan Merah overran Gorua, the Muslim community
retreated along the road north to the village of Popilo.
The Pasukan Merah advanced through Gorua destroying houses and several
mosques and attacked Popilo. This village was also quickly overrun, and many
Muslim men escaped into the forest. Some joined the large number of women and
children hiding inside the village mosque. The Christian militia attacked the
building, several men claiming they were forced into this action because the
Muslims continued to fire arrows from inside. The attack against the mosque
continued throughout the night until resistance from inside had been quelled. Upon
entering the mosque, which was now strewn with bodies, the Christians discov-
ered a pit underneath the pulpit where a large group of Muslims were hiding. A
militia member dropped a bomb into the recess. Approximately 160 people were
killed in Popilo, bringing the deaths in the two villages to around 250. It took
several days for those Muslims who had managed to flee from Gorua and Popilo to
travel through the mountainous forested area between Tobelo and Galela to reach
Soasio.61 Christian militia also searched the forest to undertake (in the words of
one militia member) a ‘cleansing operation’ of Muslims.62
At the same time a large section of the Christian militia returned south to
Togoliua, led by Benny Bitjara. Several Christian leaders including Bitjara and
Hersen Tinangon, who had remained in the large northern Kao village of
Pediwang had organized a simultaneous attack on Togoliua from Tobelo to the
north and the village of Kusuri to the south. Kusuri village had recently been built
by the local government to house Tobelos relocated from the interior of North
Halmahera. Local pastors had, since its resettlement, converted the community to
Christianity. Villagers from Kusuri and from Kao attacked Togoliua on the
morning of 29 December, reportedly led by a convicted murderer named Nyeteke.
The militia from Tobelo was late in arriving at Togoliua and the Muslim village
had largely been overrun by the Kusuri villagers by the time they arrived.63 Large
numbers of Muslims were killed trying to prevent the Kusuri Christians from
entering the village, while hundreds of others ran into the forest. As in Popilo,
dozens of Muslims, mostly women and children, fled to the village mosque, Mesjid
Al Islah. The Christian militia, including those who had arrived from Tobelo,
attacked the mosque, throwing bombs into the building, which caused the walls to
collapse in on the people cowering inside. The militia speared or shot with bows
and arrows any of the terrified Muslims that attempted to escape.
The Pasukan Merah killed approximately 250–300 people in Togoliua.64
Contrary to several reports in national Islamic newspapers which stated that those
killed had been transmigrants from Java, all respondents in Togoliua and those
involved in the attack stated that all those killed were Halmaheran people, most
Tobelos like their assailants.65 The erroneous reports in the national press probably
stem from Togoliua’s proximity to a transmigration settlement called Trans Suka
Maju, where large numbers of Javanese reside, both Muslim and Christian.
Pasukan Merah forces did attempt to attack that settlement after the destruction of
Togoliua but were stopped by the local Protestant pastor, who told them there was
Dispersion – Tobelo and Galela 115
no tension in the settlement nor any risk of violence occurring.66 Atrocities report-
edly occurred in Togoliua similar to those in Gorua and Popilo.67 The Christian
militia searched in the forests for those villagers who had fled, killing an undeter-
mined number. Many who escaped spent approximately two weeks in the forest
attempting to reach Soasio in Galela. All buildings in the village were destroyed,
including local government offices, a health clinic, a school and a new water puri-
fication plant. The army company stationed in Tobelo City requested that NHM,
the company operating the mine at Gosowong in Kao, provide a backhoe to bury
bodies from the village.
As the surrounding sub-district was engulfed in violence, Christians in
Gamhoku were no longer able to protect their Muslim neighbours. On 29
December a small number of Muslim men from Gamhoku village became
involved in a clash in nearby gardens with Christians from the neighbouring
village of Upa. After the Muslim men returned to Gamhoku, several bleeding
from the fight, the local Christians, fearing the arrival of men from Upa, moved a
large section of the Muslim community into the village church for protection.
Another group remained in the village mosque. Inevitably, approximately a
hundred Christian men from Upa and other adjacent villages, fresh from the
violence in Tobelo City, arrived and attacked the church. During the attack, a fire
broke out inside the building, and the Christian militia killed approximately 30
Muslims as they fled.
Background
The neighbouring sub-district of Galela had a population of 35,245 in 1999,68
evenly dispersed between the capital Soasio and a number of large villages located
around the shores of Lake Duma (see Map 5.2).69 The majority of the Galela popu-
lation are from the Galela ethnic group, closely related to the Tobelos, and many
family connections exist between the two communities. The majority of Galelas
and of the Galela Sub-District population are Muslim, as are the majority in the
sub-district capital, Soasio, located around 20 km north of Tobelo. 70
Most villages in Galela had mixed religious populations, usually with small
Christian minorities. Christians were concentrated in Duma, which was exclu-
sively Christian, and the neighbouring villages of Dokulamo and Soatobaru. A
chain of contiguous villages, either exclusively Muslim or Christian or religiously
mixed, stretched along the western bank of Lake Duma (see Map 5.2). The capital
Soasio and the villages located nearby such as Igobula, Togawa and Pune had
Muslim majorities. The Christian community considers Duma to be the historical
and spiritual centre of the Protestant Church on Halmahera. The village was the
site of the first church set up by the Dutch Reformed Church and the centre of its
missionary activity in North Maluku. The village of Mamuya in south Galela was
also the site of the first Portuguese Catholic missionary settlement, although there
are now few, if any, Catholics residing in Galela.
Map 7 Galela
Dispersion – Tobelo and Galela 117
As in Tobelo, all respondents agreed that relations between Christians and
Muslims in Galela had generally been good before the Ambon conflict and the
riots in Ternate and Tidore. Just as in Tobelo, close family ties existed between
Muslim and Christian Galelas. Almost all respondents had a parent, uncle, grand-
mother or other relative from a different religion. Respondents from both religions
told me they frequently celebrated religious festivals together, worked together,
assisted one another in building houses and dined in each other’s homes. However,
some (generally Christian) respondents stated that tension had been rising between
the communities for some time. For example, in the village of Soatobaru several
Christians recounted their anger at how Muslims in the village had deliberately
constructed a mosque that was bigger than the church. 71
Most inhabitants of Galela are employed in the copra industry. As discussed in
Chapter 2, in 1991 the Indonesian company PT Global Agronusa Indonesia (GAI)
established a 2,000 ha banana plantation in the north of Galela. In 1999 GAI
employed approximately 3,000 people, including large numbers of locals and
people from outside north Halmahera who lived on the plantation base. In 1998,
after the onset of reformasi, a group of local university students returned to the
sub-district to organize protest action over the prices paid for land by GAI to local
farmers. However, all respondents were adamant that this had been supported by
both religious communities, and that GAI had nothing to do with the violence that
broke out in 1999. 72
Rising tension
The ongoing violence in Ambon created moderate tensions in Galela, particularly
in the area around Lake Duma. Several Christian respondents claimed that in
mid-1999 Muslim youth in Gotalamo and elsewhere were carrying out fitness and
weapons training. After the destruction of the two Kao villages, Sosol and
Wangeotak, in August the Protestant Church (GMIH) in Galela sent food and
clothing to the Kao IDPs sheltering in Kao. This assistance subsequently caused
tension with the Muslim community, members of which accused Christians of
sending men and weapons to assist in the Kao retaliation against Malifut.73
As in Tobelo, Christians in Galela were angered at the riots in Tidore and
Ternate. A small group of IDPs from Payahe and elsewhere in Central Halmahera
arrived in Christian villages around Duma. They were few in number and their
presence in Galela did not affect inter-communal relations to the extent that the
much larger numbers of IDPs in Tobelo had done. However, the dissemination of
rumours during November and early December appears to have increased tension
to very high levels around Galela. Christian villagers said that by December it was
very difficult to travel south to Tobelo, the major local city and the source of
almost all supplies needed in Galela. The only road to Tobelo wound through
Muslim villages such as Togawa and Igobula as well as through the sub-district
capital, Soasio, which had a strong Muslim majority.
Community leaders, both in the capital Soasio and in the densely populated area
around the western edge of Lake Duma, attempted to lessen this rising tension and
118 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
maintain peace. In Soasio, leaders from both Muslim and Christian communities
met and formed the organization Galela Sariloha Family Communication Forum
(Forum Kommunikasi Keluarga Galela Sariloha). The goal of the organization
was to anticipate conflict and reduce any tension that arose between the communi-
ties.74 Local community and religious leaders also held a series of meetings in
villages around Lake Duma to discuss ways of ensuring that violence did not occur
between them. At least one Christian leader from Duma, Josafat Etha, travelled to
several surrounding Muslim villages such as Ngidiho and Gotalamo. The village
heads of Soatobaru and Dokulamo also met to promote peace. Leaders from both
religious communities in Soakonora agreed to monitor and deflect provocation of
their communities.75 The sub-district government appears to have attempted little
in the way of peace-building, however. In Soasio, Christian respondents claim
neither the Muslim sub-district head nor his staff did anything to ameliorate the
rising tension in the capital.
Members of both communities were increasingly suspicious of the intentions of
the other. Just as in Tobelo, in late December the atmosphere in several villages in
Galela became tense. Rumours that each community was planning an attack to
coincide with either Christmas or Idul Fitri spread through all villages from
Samuda to Ngidiho.76 Communities in the villages of Galela, particularly those
around Lake Duma, prepared for violent conflict at least as vigorously as those in
Tobelo Sub-District. Against the orders of some village heads, members of both
communities made bows and arrows and spears.77 Small incidents that appeared to
demonstrate the aggressive intent of the other community became more frequent.
In several villages, youths from both communities threw stones at the houses of
members of the other community. In the capital, Soasio, Christian businesspeople
and local government staff fled the town several days before rioting broke out.78
While some community leaders were attempting to arrest the rising tension and
prevent conflict, some Christian leaders from Duma and Soatobaru also appear to
have planned to respond in a coordinated manner if violence did occur.
Further south and somewhat isolated from the rest of Galela, the mixed village
of Mamuya was divided by particularly high tensions. The population was almost
evenly split between Christians and Muslims and was spatially segregated, with
Muslims occupying the northern half of the village and Christians the southern
half. Christians in the village felt isolated from the main Christian villages of
Duma to the north and Tobelo to the south. On 16 December a stone-throwing inci-
dent led to an assault on two police officers, and on 19 December a Muslim man
was badly beaten by Christian youths. Christian respondents said that for several
weeks before the eventual outbreak they could not venture into the northern part of
the village for fear of being attacked.79 Christians were also concerned about
aggression from the Muslim village, Luari, located just across the border in Tobelo
Sub-District. Muslims considered the Christians in the southern part of that village
to be militant and preparing for conflict.80
Dispersion – Tobelo and Galela 119
Violence in Galela
People in the capital and villages of Galela first heard of the rioting in Tobelo when
several passenger vehicles that regularly travel between the two sub-districts
turned back to Galela on the evening of 26 December. When further accounts
reached the banana plantation, workers began to flee their compound in large
numbers. The first clashes in Galela Sub-District appear to have taken place in
Soasio and the adjacent village of Pune. Throughout the night of 26 December
Muslim IDPs had arrived by speedboat in Soasio from Tobelo. The Christian
community of Soasio fled to the GMIH church compound and spent a nervous
night before a mob of Muslim men attacked the compound with homemade bombs
and spears at dawn. Muslim youths from Pune, considered ‘radical’ by the Chris-
tian community, led the attacks. Christian respondents stated that the imam from
the Pune mosque pleaded with the crowd of Muslim men to stop attacking the
church compound, but no government officials attempted to placate the crowd.
Although the sub-district police station was only 200 m away, police personnel did
nothing to stop the attack.81 The Christian community was able to flee into the
forest and was evacuated by villagers from Mamuya two days later.82 The church
and surrounding compound was destroyed. On 27 December Muslims in the
villages of Togawa and Igobula near Soasio also expelled the small Christian
communities from their own villages, killing several people.
After stories of rioting in Tobelo and Soasio reached the villages around Lake
Duma on the morning of 27 December, crowds of armed men gathered in front of
mosques and churches in the adjacent villages of Soatobaru and Dokulamo. Both
sides claim the other was wearing symbols of religious identity, such as either red
or white headbands. Several Muslim and Christian leaders moved between neigh-
bouring villages.83 To members of the other religious community, these individ-
uals appeared to be coordinating attacks with neighbouring villages. After several
hours in which the opposing forces faced each other on the streets, an explosion,
apparently from a homemade bazooka, ignited rioting in Soatobaru in the late
afternoon of 27 December.
As the strongest Christian village in Galela, Duma was always going to play
a central role in any conflict in the sub-district. On 27 December, having heard
of the rioting in Tobelo, the Christian villagers of Duma gathered in turns for a
religious service in the local church. While small groups entered the church, the
rest maintained security posts at both ends of the village. 84 Weapons were taken
into the church and blessed by the pastor. The pastor instructed the residents of
Duma that they should fight if attacked but not attack first.85 When villagers
saw smoke rising from rioting in Soatobaru, and a group of Duma men clashed
with Muslim youth from Gotalamo to the north at approximately 5 p.m., the
villagers launched offensive action with devastating consequences for the area.
Within three hours, the Duma militia had driven all Muslim residents of
Gotalamo from their homes into the forest and destroyed the entire village. The
militia destroyed the mosque in the village despite the appeals of at least one
Christian leader from Duma.
120 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
At dawn the following morning, 28 December, men from Duma attacked the
villages of Dokulamo and Soatobaru, quickly expelling the Muslim communities.
Muslims from these villages were forced to walk through the forest towards the
capital Soasio, which was still controlled by Muslims. At 12.30 p.m., immedi-
ately after the attacks against Dokulamo and Soatobaru, Christians from Duma,
Soatobaru, Dokulamo and Makete moved north and attacked the mainly Muslim
village of Ngidiho. Prior to this attack, the Muslim village head of Ngidiho had
warned Christians living in the village to leave, which they did, moving to
Duma.86 One report stated that, following the departure of the Christian commu-
nity, Muslims from the villages of Simau and Toweka destroyed the Christians’
vacated houses, before attacking the Christian village of Makete, where they
were met and routed by the advancing Christian militia from Duma.87 However,
my research suggests that Ngidiho and the villages to the east did not in fact
attempt any attack against Duma before Christians from Duma attacked Ngidiho.
Eight Muslims were killed in the attack.
On the morning of 28 December Muslims from Igobula attacked the Christian
villages of Bale and Samuda to the west. Muslims were angered that Christians
from Bale had travelled to Soatobaru to help rioting Christians on the afternoon
of 27 December and that all Muslims had fled the area to the west.88 Neverthe-
less, security concerns were paramount in this decision to attack. The village
head, fearing for the safety of women and children, said that his community did
not want to wait until his village was attacked by Christians from Bale and
Samuda and the other larger villages to the west (Duma and Soatobaru).89
Muslim leaders decided it was better to create a buffer zone between the Chris-
tian and Muslim areas around the western edge of Lake Duma by driving the
Christian community from the village. Christians from Samuda spent four days
in the forest before arriving at Soatobaru and Duma.
Within two days, the violence in Galela had established two exclusive Chris-
tian and Muslim areas. Christians were concentrated in the area of Duma and
Soatobaru and Muslims in the area from Igobula east to Soasio. Attacks
continued between Christians and Muslims from these two areas for several
weeks until the Muslim community left Igobula and Togawa and moved to
Soasio or to Ternate and South Sulawesi.
Conclusion
‘Because people prepared, it happened.’ This statement by a village head in
Galela, while not completely capturing the complexity of the Tobelo and Galela
riots, goes a long to explaining the clashes. Violence spread to Tobelo and Galela
because conflict elsewhere had created physical security concerns for both
communities. A series of events throughout 1999, such as violence in Ambon and
Malifut, caused relations between Christians and Muslims in Tobelo and Galela to
deteriorate. However, most Muslims and Christians considered the Ambon
conflict to be too far removed from north Halmahera, and the Malifut clashes to be
too local in character, to ignite violence in their own community.
It was the riots in Tidore and Ternate that dramatically altered the
inter-communal relationship in Tobelo City and in villages throughout Tobelo and
Galela Sub-Districts. The flight of IDPs to Tobelo, including several Christian
leaders who had been members of the district parliament, along with the religious
character of the violence elsewhere, created an environment in which several
factors made violence more likely. First, both communities in Tobelo and Galela
perceived threats to their safety, land and economic livelihoods from the other reli-
gious community. In order to circumvent this threat, each community began to
prepare large supplies of weapons and undertook other preparations for conflict, in
turn appearing to pose a threat to the other community. Second, each community
began to consider that the other held malign intent not just toward them as individ-
uals, but also posed a threat to the sustainability of their religion in the region.
Therefore some members of each community began to emphasize the strength and
solidarity of their community, in turn increasing the sense of physical and existen-
tial threat. Third, militants assumed greater status within the community and were
paid protection money by local businesses. While not necessarily seeking to
initiate violence, these individuals therefore had an interest in continuing vola-
tility. In some cases community leaders more renowned for providing security for
markets and economic infrastructure emphasized a selective and militaristic
reading of religious texts.
Indeed the detail presented in this chapter has shown how this environment of
insecurity alone does not cause violence. Each religious community in Tobelo was
divided into several sub-groups with different agendas and opinions regarding the
use of force. The agency in any conflict situation therefore ranges from peace-
making to accidental provocation to intentional aggression. Whether the outcome
is large-scale violence, uneasy peace or reconciliation depends as much on the
actions and interests and identities particular to that situation as much as it does on
the prevailing social structure.
Dispersion – Tobelo and Galela 129
The violence discussed in this chapter, particularly in Tobelo Sub-District, stim-
ulated nation-wide calls for jihad against Christians in Maluku and North Maluku.
In Java, radical Muslim leaders created a large militia which they dispatched to
Ambon and elsewhere in Maluku Province. In North Maluku, Muslim leaders in
Ternate and Tidore also created a large militia made up of IDPs from Tobelo and
Galela and Muslims from elsewhere in the province. The creation of this militia
and its operations on Halmahera are the focus of a later chapter. The next chapter
deals with clashes that broke out on Ternate simultaneously with those in Tobelo
and Galela. In this second outbreak on Ternate, however, Muslims fought against
Muslims. As the next chapter demonstrates, along with ethnic, religious and
economic tensions, political tension was never far from the North Maluku conflict.
6 Political exploitation – the
Putih–Kuning
Introduction
Towering above a busy intersection in central Ternate City is an arresting, almost
shocking statue. A traditional North Malukan man stands, his machete held aloft,
the other arm pointing in accusation to the north. On the statue’s base, dozens of
faces scream in agony. If you follow the line of the man’s finger your eyes come to
rest on the Sultan of Ternate’s palace. The inscription declares that the statue is a
memorial to the ‘Bloody Ramadan Tragedy’. Yet it is not the violence in Tobelo
that this statue commemorates, but instead intra-Muslim clashes that engulfed
Ternate in December 1999. As the Islamic holy month drew to a close, a conflict
began that would have major ramifications for political power in the new province.
This new outbreak of violence erupted in Ternate while Muslims and Christians
were fighting for control of the sub-districts of Tobelo and Galela. This time the
violence was between Muslims from different ethnic groups and was far more political
in character. The traditional guards of the Sultan of Ternate, Mudaffar Syah, along
with other Ternates, fought with large numbers of Tidores, Makians and other groups
from the southern areas of Ternate City. Thousands of men from neighbouring Tidore
Island also joined the latter group and together they defeated Mudaffar Syah’s tradi-
tional guards. The clashes became known as the Putih–Kuning (White–Yellow)
conflict, after the colours worn by the opposing groups.
As discussed in Chapter 1, there are two widely held explanations for these riots,
which appear so incongruous in the context of inter-religious conflict elsewhere in
North Maluku. The first suggests that the violence was largely spontaneous, born
out of the frustration of migrant Muslims at the arrogant behaviour of Mudaffar
Syah’s guards and lingering resentment at the sultan’s protection of Christians
during the November riot in Ternate. The second explanation suggests that the
violence was elite-led, a consequence of Mudaffar Syah’s desperate quest to
assume power in the new province. A variant of this elite competition explanation
suggests the conflict marked the resurgence of the historic struggle between the
Sultanates of Ternate and Tidore for dominance in the region.
This chapter examines the main causes of rising tension in the city and considers
whether the combatants were intentionally mobilized, and if so by whom. The
chapter discusses how the violence started, what motivated those involved and,
Political exploitation – the Putih–Kuning 131
importantly, why the security forces took so little action to prevent or halt the
violence once it had begun. I argue that while some non-Ternates did feel
animosity towards Mudaffar Syah and his traditional guards, the violence in the
city appears to have been premeditated by a wide section of the political elite and
bureaucracy who felt threatened by the growing political and strategic dominance
of the sultan. Before giving an account of how the Putih–Kuning conflict unfolded,
I explore theoretical explanations of how political competition can play a major
role in communal violence, which I believe help to explain how intra-Muslim
clashes could erupt in the middle of a religious war.
Those screaming for blood and revenge in the crowd are making use of
slogans provided to them as a justification for actions that serve either their
interests or those of their political organizations, or for which they are paid,
partly in cash and partly by the loot they gain – under the cover provided by
the crowds so massed, by the justification given for the violence, and by the
near certainty that they will escape prosecution.12
Intra-Muslim conflict
In late December a series of small incidents occurred in Ternate that developed
into rioting. This conflict began almost simultaneously with the outbreak of
violence in Tobelo City. On Monday 27 December at approximately 7.30 p.m.
members of the Pasukan Kuning on guard in front of the Golkar Party building
beat the driver of a car, who, by some accounts, had driven into their roadblock.
The man fled to his home in the nearby suburb of Kampung Pisang. Several hours
later, at approximately 11 p.m., a large group of youths, including the driver, his
friends and other men from the suburbs of Kampung Pisang and Tanah Tinggi,
attacked a group of the Pasukan Kuning near the Ternate Municipality govern-
ment offices. The two groups fought a street brawl with stones and spears until a
police unit (Brimob) arrived and attempted to separate them. After the unit
commander was injured by an explosion, however, the entire unit left the area and
the two groups resumed their fighting unhindered.
During the clashes, the youths from Kampung Pisang attacked the ‘Maria
Bintang Laut’ Catholic school, burning it to the ground. Dozens of the Pasukan
Kuning had been living in the school, which, as with most Catholic buildings, was
less damaged than their Protestant equivalents in the November riot. Both sides
appear to have retreated, the Pasukan Kuning to the Golkar Party building, which
served as their main base in the central city, and the ever-increasing numbers of
Pasukan Putih to an area near the governor’s office on Ahmad Yani Street.
At 5 a.m. the following day, 28 December, hundreds of the Pasukan Kuning
assembled with cans of petrol. Led by Yopie, the militia attacked and set fire to
houses in Kampung Pisang. The blaze spread into the neighbouring suburb of
Maliaro, destroying several more houses. Two people died in the fires, and resi-
dents of the two areas fled further up the hill away from the violence.33 After
attacking Kampung Pisang, the Pasukan Kuning moved south towards the areas
of Tanah Tinggi and Takoma (See Map 4.1). A large number of Pasukan Putih
138 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
gathered in the area around the sports stadium, striking telephone poles to attract
more residents of the area on to the street.
Kampung Pisang, as well as being home to the youths involved in the initial
clash with the Pasukan Kuning, was also inhabited by large numbers of migrants
from nearby Tidore. Many of the houses destroyed were owned by these migrants,
and news of their destruction was quickly relayed there, angering their ethnic kin.
In Tomalou on Tidore, Abu Bakar Wahid spoke before hundreds of young men,
informing them that the Sultan of Ternate was burning the houses of Tidores and
had taken control of Ternate.34 Throughout the afternoon, hundreds of men trav-
elled from Tidore to Bastiong Port in Ternate in order to join the Makians and
Tidores fighting the Pasukan Kuning. With the intervention of these men from
Tidore, the Pasukan Kuning was driven back north. The two groups fought
running battles, with spears, bows and arrows, homemade firearms and bombs,
along the two main streets through the city.
The several thousand Pasukan Kuning were outnumbered by the Pasukan
Putih, which had been reinforced by thousands of men from Tidore. They were
unable to maintain their positions in the central city. By late afternoon, the
Pasukan Putih had forced the Pasukan Kuning back to the sultan’s palace in the
north-east of the city. With the Pasukan Kuning overcome, the sultan arranged for
those Christians left in Ternate to be evacuated by ship from Dufa Dufa to
Halmahera.35
Having forced the sultan’s militia out of the central city, the Pasukan Putih
destroyed the Golkar building which had been used as a base by the Pasukan
Kuning. In explaining the destruction of the Golkar office, one leader of the
Pasukan Putih, Haji Kotu, told me that many members of the militia were angry
that Golkar appeared to have supported the sultan in the conflict.36 They argued
that as a national political party the organization should have remained neutral. As
the Pasukan Kuning retreated towards the palace, the Pasukan Putih also
destroyed another small building near the palace which had formerly been the
headquarters of the youth wing of the Pasukan Kuning. Many in the Pasukan Putih
also prepared to raze the sultan’s palace. Haji Kotu, however, told the crowd that
the palace was North Maluku’s most important cultural treasure, and should not be
destroyed.
The same day, 28 December, Surasmin, the interim governor of North Maluku,
telephoned the Sultan of Tidore to request that he try and rein in the large number
of Tidores involved in the fighting.37 In response, a delegation from the sultanate
travelled to Ternate that afternoon, including the sultan and 14 others, accompa-
nied by several hundred traditional guards.38 Upon arrival on Ternate, the Sultan of
Tidore ordered the protection of the new governor’s office, stating that the
building was likely to become the political centre for the entire community of
North Maluku.39 At 5 p.m., as the Sultan of Tidore arrived at the Sultan of
Ternate’s palace, the clashes stopped. The Sultan of Tidore and his officials
instructed those members of the traditional guards already involved to withdraw.40
The sultan’s group walked through the Pasukan Putih waiting near the palace and
all members of both militias sat down in the road.
Political exploitation – the Putih–Kuning 139
The leaders of the two traditional guards, Husen Alting of the Tidore traditional
guards and Yopie of the Pasukan Kuning, met in the street in front of the palace.
All members of the Pasukan Kuning agreed to take off their yellow hats as a
symbol of their surrender, and the Sultan of Tidore and the leadership of the
Pasukan Putih entered the palace grounds. The Tidore leadership forced the Sultan
of Ternate to sign a document taking responsibility for the Putih–Kuning conflict
and recognizing an obligation to rebuild the houses destroyed in Kampung Pisang
and elsewhere.41 After Mudaffar Syah had signed the peace agreement and the
Pasukan Kuning had withdrawn to their homes, the Pasukan Putih returned to
southern Ternate City and Tidore.42 Soon after signing the peace agreement,
Mudaffar Syah left Ternate for Jakarta. The sultan claimed he was not pressured to
leave, but merely left Ternate on a routine business trip and soon returned to
Ternate.43 Most people on the Pasukan Putih side of the conflict, however, claimed
that the peace agreement stipulated that the sultan was obliged to effectively leave
his position of authority in Ternate and North Maluku.
Estimates for casualties from the Putih–Kuning conflict vary from 18 to around
200.44 While the local government report calculates that 18 people were killed in
the violence, most respondents in Ternate put the figure at around 40. Many more
were injured. The conflict caused a great deal of damage to housing in the city,
particularly around Kampung Pisang and in areas near the sultan’s palace such as
Dufa Dufa. The report on the conflict compiled by the governor’s office stated that
241 houses were destroyed. During the clashes between the Pasukan Putih and the
Pasukan Kuning, which stretched from one side of the city to the other, no military
or police personnel were present.45
In January the North Maluku District parliament unseated Mudaffar Syah as
parliamentary chairman. Some members of parliament who had supported the
sultan had already fled the island, including all Christian members. Other
supporters had been convinced of the sultan’s malfeasance or had been intimi-
dated into abandoning their support for him. Mudaffar Syah was widely
accused, not only in Ternate but also elsewhere in Indonesia, of provoking the
violence, and using intimidation and conflict to achieve his political ambitions.
Tamrin Tomagola, a North Malukan sociologist at the University of Indonesia,
called for the investigation of Mudaffar Syah for his role in the violence in
North Maluku as a whole.46 Indonesia’s National Commission for Human
Rights (KOMNAS-HAM) initiated an investigation into accusations of human
rights abuses ordered by Mudaffar Syah, although no charges were ever
brought against him.
Stripped of formal political power and now thought by many Muslims in North
Maluku to have been responsible for much of the violence in the province,
Mudaffar Syah was no longer considered a suitable candidate for the governor-
ship. Most respondents agree that by January 2000 Bahar Andili had become the
leading candidate to assume the primary position of political power in North
Maluku.47
140 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
Explaining intra-Muslim violence during religious war
Most existing analyses explain the Putih–Kuning conflict as a spontaneous
response to mounting animosity against the Sultan of Ternate. Many Muslims,
particularly Makians and Tidores, were infuriated that Mudaffar Syah had used the
Pasukan Kuning to protect Christians during the riots in November. Many were
also disappointed that the province’s principal Islamic and cultural leader
appeared to be more interested in ensuring political support from Christians than in
defending Muslims and Islam in the region. In an article published two weeks after
the Putih–Kuning conflict in the national Muslim newspaper Republika, the North
Maluku academic Smith Alhadar suggested that many Muslims in North Maluku
had doubts about Mudaffar Syah’s commitment to Islam.48 He pointed to the
sultan’s series of (three) Christian wives, as well as his reputed penchant for
drinking alcohol. Most respondents in North Maluku, including Ternates, agreed
that Mudaffar Syah adhered to a more moderate form of Islam than was practised
by most Makians, Tidores and other migrants in southern Ternate.
Alhadar asserts that this Muslim anger came to a head when Muslims heard of
the violence in Tobelo discussed in the previous chapter. Because the sultan was
seen to have sided with Christians, after hearing of these riots Muslims in Ternate
attacked his palace guards. Alhadar writes that after ‘Christian tribes in northern
Halmahera … attacked Muslims there … on 27 December people from south
Ternate in turn attacked a Catholic school housing customary guards loyal to the
Sultan of Ternate.’49 The Putih–Kuning conflict is here seen as a direct result of
anger about these Muslim deaths in Tobelo. There is, however, reason to doubt this
explanation. As the violence began in Tobelo on the evening of 26 December,
there was certainly time for people in Ternate to hear about it. Nevertheless, at the
time that the Putih–Kuning clashes began on the evening of 27 December the
violence in Tobelo was not particularly extensive, Muslims still controlled most of
Tobelo City and most casualties had been Christian. Muslims had not yet fled the
city. It seems unlikely, therefore, that the first day of conflict in Tobelo would have
provoked the attack on the Catholic school ‘Maria Bintang Laut’ in Ternate as
Alhadar claims. It was not until 28 December, with the entry of thousands of Chris-
tian Pasukan Merah militia into Tobelo, that Muslims suffered large numbers of
casualties and all mosques in the city were destroyed. By this time the
Putih–Kuning clashes in Ternate were already well under way.
Many Christians in Tobelo also believe the rioting in Ternate in late December
was connected to the outbreak of violence in Tobelo, although for a different
reason. It is generally believed among Christians in North Halmahera that Muslims
in Ternate had planned to travel to North Halmahera to come to the aid of their
co-religionists. According to this account, the Putih–Kuning clashes occurred
when ‘jihadis’ attempted to leave Ternate but were halted by the Pasukan Kuning
and the security forces. Ahmad and Oesman, in their book written from Ternate
and presenting a strong Muslim view of the violence, also stated that the
Putih–Kuning conflict stopped Muslims from helping their co-religionists in
Tobelo and Galela.50 However, all respondents who were involved in the
Political exploitation – the Putih–Kuning 141
Putih–Kuning conflict deny that any militia attempted to leave Ternate around this
period. Therefore, although occurring simultaneously, it appears that the
Putih–Kuning and Tobelo clashes were not directly connected.
A far stronger case can be made, however, that the Putih–Kuning conflict was
caused by the actions and attitude of the Pasukan Kuning. Several young men in
Ternate who fought in the Pasukan Putih claim that it was the Pasukan Kuning’s
behaviour on patrol and at checkpoints throughout the central and northern parts of
the city that angered them and motivated their participation in the riot. Many
people, including members of the elite, were angry that the Pasukan Kuning
appeared to have replaced the military and police as the main providers of security
on the streets of the city.51
It seems clear that Mudaffar Syah, through the deployment of the Pasukan
Kuning, was indeed assuming control of the city. It is possible he thought his
provision of security may have increased his political support among the people of
Ternate. It also seems possible he was aggrieved at his failure to achieve his objec-
tives for the new province – the name, Special Region status and the location of the
capital. He may also have had legitimate concerns over the destruction of the city’s
infrastructure, including the government buildings he hoped to soon occupy.
Animosity towards Mudaffar Syah and the Pasukan Kuning was strongest
among those ethnic groups associated with the southern areas of the city such as
Makian, Tidore and Sanana. The destruction of Kampung Pisang marked the peak
of this tension between ‘north’ and ‘south’ Ternate. Several leaders from the
sultan’s side of the conflict, including Mudaffar Syah himself, deny the destruction
of Kampung Pisang was carried out by members of the Pasukan Kuning, claiming
it was the work of provocateurs intending to mobilize opposition against them.52
They suggest the men involved in the attacks on Kampung Pisang wore yellow
hats and other items of clothing so as to appear to be Pasukan Kuning. Neverthe-
less, it seems likely that the attack was indeed carried out by some members of the
Pasukan Kuning, most likely in retaliation for previous clashes. One member of
the sultan’s militia admitted that the Pasukan Kuning launched the attack in
revenge for insults against the sultan.53 He claimed Ternates and other supporters
of the sultan were traditional people and insults against him could not go
unpunished.
The sight of large areas of Ternate on fire and the striking of electricity poles by
people coming out of their houses (a common occurrence in the early stages of
rioting in North Maluku and elsewhere in eastern Indonesia) mobilized hundreds
of young men from Kampung Pisang and Tanah Tinggi and other suburbs in
southern Ternate. The fact that the Pasukan Kuning had destroyed the houses of
Muslims in Ternate fuelled claims that the militia was predominantly Christian and
that the sultan was more interested in protecting his Christian supporters than
defending the Islamic community. Many of the young men involved in the riots
were also undoubtedly driven by excitement. Several interviews with participants
reflected the ‘rush’ involved in large-scale battles along the main streets of Ternate
and the sense of power in finally opposing the Pasukan Kuning. The burning of
houses in Kampung Pisang, many of them owned by migrants from Tidore,
142 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
appears to have been an important motivation for many of the Tidores who trav-
elled to Ternate.54 This flood of reinforcements for the Pasukan Putih proved a
turning point leading to the political defeat of the Sultan.
However, several aspects of the conflict suggest that it was not completely spon-
taneous, nor stimulated solely by the behaviour of the Pasukan Kuning. As well as
anger against the Pasukan Kuning among young men on the streets, by December
there was a great deal of concern among Mudaffar Syah’s political rivals and their
supporters at his growing political hegemony. In December 1999, despite the
social unrest associated with the November riot, the political elite in Ternate and
Tidore still planned to form a provincial parliament and hold gubernatorial elec-
tions in 2000. It was still widely expected that a majority of these parliamentarians
would support Mudaffar Syah, as chairman of Golkar and a moderate Muslim, in
the upcoming gubernatorial election.55 This eventuality threatened the aspirations
of Bahar and Syamsir Andili and Thaib Armain.
The likely ascension of the Sultan of Ternate to the position of governor also
threatened the positions of thousands of non-elite Makians and Tidores in the
district bureaucracies and future provincial bureaucracy. The governor would be
responsible for all major bureaucratic appointments, including the heads of all
government departments. Many existing and prospective civil servants feared that
if he became governor Mudaffar Syah would give bureaucratic positions to
Ternates and Halmaherans, including Christians. Makians and Tidores also
resented the prospect of a return to a ‘feudalistic’ system where opportunity was
based on loyalty and ethnicity rather than on education, merit and capability. The
events of November and December, and the day to day necessity of dealing with
Pasukan Kuning patrols on the streets of the city, had given many non-Ternate
Muslims an insight into what they could expect in a North Maluku dominated by
Mudaffar Syah.
In line with Snyder’s argument on political transition in the former Soviet
Union, it appears that Mudaffar Syah’s political rivals began mobilizing their
followers for violent action to protect their political power.56 Many of these men
had a great deal of influence and were able to draw upon support in the bureau-
cracy as well as ethnic networks. The rising resentment against Mudaffar Syah
among migrant men provided an opportunity to stimulate rioting against him. The
leaders of these militias on Tidore and Ternate – later to merge as the Pasukan
Putih – were inspired not by Mudaffar Syah’s protection of Christians nor his
supposed support for the attack on Malifut, but by their opposition to his powerful
political position in Ternate.
The leader of the Pasukan Putih on Ternate, Muhammad Selang, claimed
people rose up because they were angry that the sultan and his troops wanted to
control the city.57 Another leader stated, ‘We only wanted to show them we were
the majority.’58 Other Makian leaders claimed that, by December, many people
had become concerned at what they called Mudaffar Syah’s political hegemony.
On Tidore, Abu Bakar Wahid mobilized young men to travel to Ternate by
asserting that the sultan’s militia had not only destroyed Kampung Pisang, but also
already controlled 70 per cent of Ternate City.59
Political exploitation – the Putih–Kuning 143
Pointing to the involvement of numerous Tidores in the riots, one analyst has
argued that the primary dynamic in the Putih–Kuning conflict was competition
between the Ternate and Tidore sultanates for political and cultural control in the
new province.60 To many people in North Maluku this argument appears highly
feasible, given the centuries of rivalry between the two sultanates prior to and
during the Dutch colonial era. While the destruction of houses owned by Tidore
migrants no doubt angered many of their co-ethnics still living on Tidore, it is
unlikely that the Sultan of Tidore, Djunus Syah, played a major role in instigating
the Putih–Kuning conflict, however. My interview with Djunus Syah suggested he
had little interest in challenging the Sultan of Ternate, particularly militarily.
Members of the Tidore sultanate’s traditional troops also denied the sultan had sent
them to Ternate to join the attacks on the Pasukan Kuning. They claimed that while
many of their number did join the attacks they did not do so as representatives of
the sultanate. According to all officials of the sultanate and members of the tradi-
tional guards, the sultan only officially sent his troops as a means of ending the
conflict in Ternate. As discussed above, the Sultan of Tidore was a recent
appointee, chosen by the district head of Central Halmahera and gubernatorial
candidate, Bahar Andili, and had little political ambition independent of his
sponsor.
Because the position of Sultan of Tidore had been vacant for around five
decades, many of the members of the traditional Tidore guards had become more
involved in politics than in traditional or ceremonial activities. Many members of
the Pasukan Adat, particularly the leadership, were more politically minded and
better educated than their counterparts in the Pasukan Kuning in Ternate. Many
were bureaucrats and politicians and, hence, looked to the district head, Bahar
Andili, as the main power holder in Tidore and Central Halmahera. He enjoyed
widespread support in Tidore not only because of his influence as district head but
also because of his campaign to have the capital of the province located in Central
Halmahera District. The mobilization of men on Tidore to end the Sultan of
Ternate’s growing provincial dominance was not carried out under the direct influ-
ence of Djunus Syah, but by Mudaffar Syah’s political rivals.
While Ternate had only for a short period been ‘riot prone’ it is clear that some
of the elements of Brass’s ‘institutionalized riot system’ existed in that city in
1999. Abu Bakar Wahid returned from Ambon after the outbreak of violence there
stating his determination to prevent any repeat of the same attacks on Muslims in
North Maluku. As Muslims constituted a large majority in North Maluku, particu-
larly on Tidore (95 per cent), where Abu Bakar Wahid resided, this was not a real-
istic concern. It appears his main goal was similar to that of Brass’s ‘riot
specialists’ – to keep a minority, in this case Christians, ‘cowed’ and Muslims
‘ready and alert for mobilization, for crowd action, and for violence if necessary
should it be considered desirable for political or other reasons’.61
Mudaffar Syah was portrayed as supporting his own political ambitions and his
Christian supporters at the expense of Muslims. Mudaffar Syah’s rivals used these
and other issues, such as his apparent failure to live in accordance with Islam, to
stimulate sectarian tension as a means of unifying Muslim parliamentarians
144 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
against him before scheduled gubernatorial elections. The violence and the
massive mobilization against Mudaffar Syah intimidated politicians who
supported his candidacy for the governorship. The destruction of the Golkar
building in particular was a clear message to the political supporters of the sultan.
An important feature of the Putih–Kuning clashes was the inaction of the Indo-
nesian military and police. It must have been clear during December that the pres-
ence and behaviour of the Pasukan Kuning, who carried spears and other sharp
weapons, was creating tension and anger on the streets of the city. Yet the security
forces took no action against them. Then, as rioting began, neither the military nor
the police acted to stop the militia attacking Kampung Pisang and moving into the
areas of Tanah Tinggi and elsewhere to fight with migrant youths. Nor did they act
as the Pasukan Putih, including perhaps thousands of men from Tidore, forced the
Pasukan Kuning back towards the sultan’s palace, destroying several buildings
important to the provincial infrastructure, including the provincial Golkar Party
office. Security personnel remained in their compounds during the conflict.
There were clearly enough security personnel present in Ternate City to halt the
violence. Military and police contingents were stationed in the city, each with
approximately 100 men. Security personnel had an opportunity to halt the rioting
in the early stages of the clashes, which took place immediately adjacent to the
police compound, but did not do so. What explains this inaction? One possible
explanation can be discounted. With both parties to the conflict being Muslim,
religious bias did not affect the behaviour of the security forces. The sultan’s
alleged protection of Christians was not sufficient to unite the city’s security
forces, many of whom were Ternates, against him.
There are several possible reasons for this inaction. As discussed in Chapter 2,
in late 1999 there was a great deal of domestic and international pressure for the
government to bring security personnel to trial for apparent human rights viola-
tions, particularly during the violence that occurred after the independence refer-
endum in East Timor in September that year. While no military personnel explicily
expressed concern to me about the possibility of accusations of human rights abuse
arising from their response to the conflict in Ternate (as others involved in the
violence in Tobelo and Malifut did), it is possible some may have been afraid to
use the lethal force necessary to halt these clashes. Another possible explanation
concerns the announcement, made only six months previously on 1 April 1999,
that the Indonesian Police (Polri) were to become an autonomous institution, free
of a long-standing subordinate position to the military.62 It is possible that the local
military in North Maluku were seeking to demonstrate the lack of capacity of the
police to deal with major internal security problems, as a means of ultimately
regaining this responsibility. Confusion over which institution was tasked with
responding to which disturbances may also have affected both institutions’
performance.
Yet it seems likely that local political factors contributed more to this lack of
response by the security forces. In 1999, after years of authoritarian and military
rule, the security forces were not directly responsible to local political leaders but
to their own superior officers in Jakarta, who were in turn directly responsible to
Political exploitation – the Putih–Kuning 145
the president. However, whoever became governor of North Maluku, whether
Bahar Andili or Mudaffar Syah, would be likely to exercise enough influence in
Jakarta to successfully seek the removal of those commanders who had opposed
them. In clashes widely seen as deciding the ultimate alignment of future political
power in the new province, military and police commanders appear to have felt it
safer to order their personnel to remain in their barracks.
Conclusion
In a conflict occurring as a new province was born, political competition was never
likely to be far from the surface. This chapter has demonstrated that members of
the Ternate elite exploited the existing communal conflict in the province to
weaken a political rival and obtain political benefit. The large numbers of Makians
and Tidores in the three district bureaucracies in Ternate and Tidore presented a
sizeable constituency which shared these goals. Yet the mobilization of such a
large group and the riot against the Pasukan Kuning cannot be separated from
more emotional factors associated with the conflict itself, such as the Sultan of
Ternate’s claimed support for Christians at the expense of Muslims. The process
that his political opponents had begun with the anti-Christian riots in November
came to fruition in late December.
Political tension was at its height in Ternate in December 1999. Throughout
November and December there had been growing tension between Mudaffar Syah
and his Pasukan Kuning on the one hand and the migrant-dominated south of
Ternate City on the other. Many Makians remained angry at Mudaffar Syah for
protecting Christians during the November riot and for supporting the Kaos in the
Malifut dispute. The Pasukan Kuning had also alienated and angered other
Muslim men from Ternate by their arrogant and aggressive behaviour.
However, more importantly, the Sultan’s ascension to power threatened the
gubernatorial aspirations of his opponents and the dominance in local government
and bureaucracy of the migrant groups which had settled over the previous
decades. In late December the sultan remained a powerful political force and was
the likely winner of the first gubernatorial election. In addition, his traditional
troops had taken control of large swathes of Ternate City, assuming responsibility
for law and order in place of the local police and thereby augmenting his electoral
dominance. Around this time, several ethnic and political factions united against
him because of the Malifut riots and his growing dominance. The leaders of these
factions exploited the existing animosity towards him and the tension caused by
the wider conflict in North Maluku to first unify the Muslim vote against him, and
second, to undermine his dominance by force. Contrary to some analyses, the
Sultan of Tidore played only a peripheral role in the Putih–Kuning conflict.
Recently appointed by Bahar Andili, the sultan merely provided traditional legiti-
macy to the district head’s campaign for the governorship and played no role in
instigating or exacerbating the conflict.
Following a clash between the Pasukan Kuning and youths, massive force was
brought to bear on the sultan and his troops. Local security forces made no effort to
146 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
halt the fighting, demonstrating a lack of willingness to oppose any future power
holder in the province. The sultan was defeated, and fell as a political and strategic
force in Ternate, leaving his rivals to contest the governorship. 63
These events were quickly subsumed in the repercussions of the violence in
Tobelo. In the following days thousands of Muslim IDPs began arriving from the
violence there and from Galela in north Halmahera. Many of these IDPs related
stories of the terrible events in Tobelo, angering Muslims in Ternate and Tidore.
The leadership of the Pasukan Putih, which had initially been mobilized to defeat
Mudaffar Syah, now formed a militia more Islamic in character which they called
the Pasukan Jihad. This militia began training for the more demanding task of
waging jihad against Christians on Halmahera.
7 Killing in the name of God
Introduction
The intensity of the violence in Tobelo and Galela dramatically altered the North
Maluku conflict. Several days after the parties to the Putih–Kuning clashes in
Ternate had halted hostilities and demobilized, thousands of Muslim IDPs from
north Halmahera arrived in the city. The arrival of these people, and the stories
they brought with them of atrocities against Muslims, united Muslims in anger at
Christians. Politics and ethnicity were forgotten as religious animosity come to the
fore. Muslims from both political factions in Ternate and elsewhere in North
Maluku formed a militia to retaliate against Christians in north Halmahera – the
Pasukan Jihad (Jihad Force).
This chapter discusses the formation and goals of the Pasukan Jihad. Those
Muslims driven from their homes and seeking retribution against Christians in
Tobelo and Galela found a militia already mobilized and buoyant from its victory
over the sultan’s forces. The Tidores, Sananas and Makians who had made up the
Pasukan Putih, along with many Ternates against whom they had recently fought,
were outraged by the apparently calculated attacks against Muslim communities
by Christians in Tobelo and Galela.
The chapter begins with a theoretical consideration of the role of religion in the
mobilization of such militias. After assessing the organization and goals of the
Pasukan Jihad, the chapter then evaluates claims that several militant, national
Islamic organizations were involved in the North Maluku conflict and investigates
how the North Maluku militia fits into the wider environment of Islamic radicalism
present in Indonesia in early 2000. The chapter then discusses the two main
campaigns of the militia in Malifut and Galela. The final section brings together
the conclusions of the chapter and assesses the role of religion in the violence as
well as the varied response of the Indonesian security forces to the campaigns in
the two areas.
Organization
As the conflict between the Pasukan Kuning and the Pasukan Putih was coming to
an end in Ternate, thousands of Muslim IDPs fleeing from the violence in Tobelo
and Galela arrived in the city. They brought news of Christian attacks against
Muslims, the destruction of mosques and terrible atrocities committed against
men, women and children. These stories aroused a great deal of anger among the
Muslim community in Ternate, particularly as a result of the large numbers of dead
and the sense that the Muslims who died were innocent. The leaders of the
Pasukan Putih, along with other community leaders and imams, began mobilizing
Killing in the name of God 151
an Islamic militia to return to Halmahera. Enthused by their recent victory over the
sultan’s guards, members of the Pasukan Putih provided the basis for this militia.
By this time called the Pasukan Jihad, the group drew support from every suburb
and village on Ternate and Tidore. Two main centres of recruitment and mobiliza-
tion were established in Ternate, the Muhajrin mosque and Toboko mosque. In
Tidore, the main centre was the village of Tomalou, the home of Abu Bakar
Wahid. Wahid quickly assumed leadership of the militia.
Before leaving to attack Christians on Halmahera, potential recruits underwent
physical examination and those considered too weak or infirm were excluded or
restricted to logistical tasks. Throughout January and February, the Pasukan Jihad
conducted training in martial arts, fitness and the use of weapons. Several large
rallies were organized to recruit more members and publicize the intentions of the
Pasukan Jihad. Leaders organized a large rally in April, symbolically held in the
sports grounds in front of the exiled Sultan of Ternate’s palace. At the rally, Abu
Bakar Wahid declared that reconciliation with Christian communities should be
postponed until all Halmaheran IDPs could return to their homes.
A wide cross-section of the North Maluku Muslim community participated in
the Pasukan Jihad. Male IDPs from those ethnic groups (Makians, Tobelos and
Galelas) driven out of Halmahera by Christians comprised the majority of the
militia. These IDPs were joined by numerous men from the other main North
Maluku ethnic groups: Ternates, Tidores, Makians, Sananas, Kayoas, and Bacans.
Among the Ternates who joined the militia were many members of the Pasukan
Kuning who had recently fought against their new allies.
The militia assumed a far more religious character than the Pasukan Putih. The
Pasukan Jihad conducted prayer sessions and heard sermons inside mosques, and
during operations on Halmahera militia members were expected to pray regularly.
All mujahid wore white as a symbol of their religion.15 Yet religious guidance was
provided to militia members in Ternate and Tidore not by imams, but primarily by
teachers and other community leaders considered to have religious knowledge.
The main spiritual advisors for the Pasukan Jihad were two teachers at Islamic
schools, Abdul Gane Kasuba and Albi Shamat. Some imams did assist in mobi-
lizing the militia and several joined the Pasukan Jihad on Halmahera. Support for
the jihad may not have been universal among Islamic religious leaders, however.
One militia member said that certain imams faced intimidation and coercion to
support the militia. Some imams and other religious leaders instructed militia
members not to engage in atrocities such as the killing of women, children or
people attempting to surrender. One Makian imam recounted how he forbade any
Muslims to dismember or otherwise abuse corpses.16
Motivations/objectives
The motivations and goals of the Pasukan Jihad in North Maluku were born out of
exclusively local issues. Its formation was driven by the events in North Maluku,
in particular in North Halmahera. The IDPs who had recently arrived from Tobelo
and Galela had two goals in joining the Pasukan Jihad. First, they were enraged at
152 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
what they saw as the premeditated nature of Christian attacks against them. In
addition, they sought to defeat the Christians in their home areas so that it would be
safe for them to return to their villages. For many from Tobelo and Galela this
meant defeating Christians in the major villages of those sub-districts and in
Tobelo City. Several respondents stated that the militia planned to drive all Chris-
tians from the area if that was necessary in order to facilitate their return to their
homes.
Makian IDPs in Ternate, Tidore and elsewhere had the same goal. Expelled
from Malifut in October, they saw in the tide of Muslim anger an opportunity to
return to their homes. Many of the leaders of the Pasukan Jihad, such as Wahda
Zainal Imam and Abu Bakar Wahid, along with some politicians who supported
the jihad such as Thaib Armain, were also motivated by a desire to avenge the
destruction of Malifut. Makians also sought revenge for the attacks against
Muslims and the strong anti-Makian sentiment that had been displayed in Tobelo.
The return of Muslims to their homes was also an important goal for the
Pasukan Jihad leadership. Abu Bakar Wahid claimed that the militia was moti-
vated by a desire to protect the rights of Muslims, including the right to live wher-
ever they chose in Indonesia.17 It is possible that leading politicians and
bureaucrats supported the militia’s campaign partly because they realized that the
long-term presence of Muslim IDPs in Ternate was untenable. Most, therefore,
hoped to see Christians on Halmahera defeated so that the tens of thousands of
Muslims could return to their villages. The displacement of additional Christians
caused by attacks on Halmahera would not be a problem for the local government
because it was assumed that they would mostly go to North Sulawesi, like those
who had fled earlier violence.
Like those from Halmahera, Muslims from the main ethnic groups in Ternate
and Tidore (Ternate, Tidore, Sanana) also joined the Pasukan Jihad out of anger
about what appeared to have been brutal, premeditated attacks by Christians in
Tobelo and Galela. The events in Tobelo (especially Togoliua and Popilo) consti-
tuted perhaps the most terrible atrocities of the conflicts in both Maluku and North
Maluku. Muslim IDPs from Tobelo brought stories of the killing of men, women
and children in mosques and even those under the protection of the security forces.
Stories of beheadings, forced conversions, kidnappings and rapes added to the
anger.
This anger against Christians on Halmahera was framed in the terms of jihad
and other Islamic references. At a large rally organized by the Pasukan Jihad in
Ternate in April, Abu Bakar Wahid declared to the thousands of armed men
assembled there that they would fight until the day of reckoning (Hari Kiamat).18
Leaders pronounced that all able-bodied Muslim men must avenge the attacks on
Muslims and protect those who remained in Halmahera. The principles of jihad
and a sense of Islamic solidarity clearly motivated those Muslims (such as
Ternates and Tidores) who had not been directly affected by the violence in north
Halmahera. However, IDPs from Tobelo, Galela and Malifut, while no doubt
inspired and energized by proclamations of Islamic solidarity, had concrete goals –
retribution against Christians and the chance to return to their homes.
Killing in the name of God 153
Some Muslims, including at least one community leader who had led the
Pasukan Putih against the Sultan of Ternate, refused to take part in the jihad.
Several claimed they did not want jihad waged in their name, believing that the
preconditions for holy war were not present. Those who did not participate and
travel to Halmahera were required to pay a form of taxation to support the militia.
Yet it appears little coercion was applied to men who chose not to participate and
did not attend the meetings at which the militia was organized. Several male trans-
vestites also participated in the jihad, which perhaps demonstrates the non-puritan
nature of the militia. Those individuals who did join the Pasukan Jihad stood to
gain a great deal of prestige within society.19
Abu Bakar Wahid claimed the primary goal of the Pasukan Jihad was to oppose
and defeat a resurgence of the 1950s RMS separatist organization which he
declared was operating on Halmahera.20 He proclaimed to militia members that if
the Christian militia opposed the Pasukan Jihad, it was thereby opposing the Indo-
nesian republic.21 Other Muslims in Ternate and elsewhere, including individuals
not involved in Pasukan Jihad, also claimed that the RMS was present in Tobelo.
Many believed that without external provocation by the RMS, the Christian and
Muslim members of the Tobelo ‘family’ could not possibly have begun to kill each
other.22 Assertions by the militia that they were fighting against a separatist organi-
zation were reflected in the carrying of red-and-white Indonesian national flags by
the militia members.23
As discussed in Chapter 2, the North Maluku region had remained isolated from
the RMS rebellion in the 1950s.24 The conflict between the forces of the Indone-
sian Republic and the RMS was confined to the south of Maluku Province, not
affecting the northern area which was to become North Maluku. Furthermore,
there was no evidence that RMS was active in North Maluku in 1999 and 2000 and
no signs of RMS presence such as flags, symbols, propaganda or other documenta-
tion. The presence of Ambonese Christians in Tobelo appears to have been the
only supposed evidence of the presence of this (largely defunct) organization in
North Maluku. The Christian leaders most commonly accused by Muslims of
‘being RMS’, such as Jacob Soselissa, Frans Manerry and May Luhulima, deny
there was any connection between Christians in North Maluku and RMS or any
other separatist organization.25
The declaration by Abu Bakar Wahid and others that the Pasukan Jihad was
fighting against the RMS was perhaps based more on deliberate calculation than a
mistaken belief. Such statements created the impression that the militia was
fighting Christians who were carrying out ethnic cleansing of Muslims in order to
create a new Christian state, thereby undermining the territorial integrity of Indo-
nesia. Through such claims, the leaders of the Pasukan Jihad calculated that the
Indonesian military would not hinder their operations on Halmahera. While mili-
tary commanders in North Maluku may not have believed claims about the RMS,
in some cases these pronouncements by the Pasukan Jihad leadership at least gave
them a pretext for avoiding a confrontation and for allowing the militia to travel to,
and operate in, Halmahera. The security forces seemed reluctant to confront the
Pasukan Jihad for a variety of reasons – sympathy with the militia’s goals, concern
154 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
about its size and fear about the consequences of clashes, and worries about
apparent connections the militia leaders had with civilian provincial power
holders.
Malifut
After the Kaos’ destruction of Malifut in late October 1999, the security forces in
the area were greatly reinforced. Approximately 50 army personnel were posted
near Tanjung Barnabas, the port used by the mining company NHM to service the
nearby Gosowong mine. A further 50 external and local army personnel were
posted either at the port or at the mine itself. A police paramilitary (Brimob) unit
was dispatched to the largely deserted area of Malifut.
In the two months after the destruction of Malifut, Christian militias patrolled
the roads between Kao and Sidangoli on the coast facing Ternate. The Kao militia,
the Pasukan Merah, continued to search the public transport vans that carried
people from Galela and Tobelo to Sidangoli, on at least one occasion beating a
young Makian passenger. Armed militias from Muslim villages in Jailolo
Sub-District also monitored the road from Malifut to Sidangoli, although no Chris-
tians travelled on this road over this period. Despite the increased security pres-
ence, the Kaos returned to Malifut in the week after the anti-Christian rioting in
Ternate, and burned a small number of deserted Makian houses that remained
standing. On one occasion, security personnel appear to have been intimidated by
the presence of the large Kao militia in the area. In late November, army and
Brimob personnel withdrew from Kao and Malifut after hearing rumours that the
Kaos planned to attack them.
During November and December, the Kaos demanded that former employees of
NHM be allowed to return to work at the mine. On several occasions former
Killing in the name of God 161
employees, armed with machetes and other weapons, travelled to the site’s
entrance and demanded a return to work, but were turned away by Brimob
personnel. NHM managers informed the Kaos that no employees would be rehired
until the security situation had been resolved.80 By the start of December the secu-
rity situation around Kao and Malifut had improved to the extent that 30 of the
army personnel stationed at Tanjung Barnabas returned to Sidangoli.
Then in December and early January came the terrible events in Tobelo and the
gathering storm of religious war. In January tension began to increase in Kao as
stories of the mobilization of thousands of Muslims and declarations of jihad in
Ternate and Tidore were heard in Kao. When stories reached Kao that Muslims
were preparing to depart in order to launch an attack against them, the Kaos went
on to a war footing.
On 8 January the Pasukan Jihad gathered in a mosque in the village of Tomalou
on Tidore, and prayed before their departure for Sidangoli. Many members of the
militia were Makian IDPs, most carrying homemade weapons. According to the
militia’s leader, Abu Bakar Wahid, military personnel stationed at the port of Rum
on Tidore attempted to prevent the Pasukan Jihad from leaving but, upon hearing
that the militia was seeking to defend the republic against separatist RMS forces on
Halmahera, allowed the militia to depart unhindered. The militia travelled to
Halmahera in a flotilla of approximately 40 boats, each carrying some 75 men.81
On hearing rumours that the Muslim militia had left Ternate, about a thousand
Kaos, led by Benny Bitjara, gathered at the village of Dum Dum west of Malifut.
By 22 January several thousand mujahid gathered in the west of Malifut
Sub-District.82 That day the two sides faced each other in the Tabobo area (See
Map 3.1), the mujahid outnumbering the Kaos by several thousand. The military
and police units present attempted to separate them but several skirmishes took
place and a few Kaos were killed. The Kao militia retreated further east, pursued
by the Pasukan Jihad. The two groups again massed within sight of each other at
the Tanjung Barnabas port, separated by approximately 100 army personnel, while
another 100 personnel guarded the mine site at Gosowong nearby.83 The mining
company hastily brought in 40 military reinforcements from Wasile Sub-District
to Tanjung Barnabas port.
In the late afternoon the approximately 140 military personnel present forced
the Kao militia to withdraw, firing repeatedly into the ground around them. The
Pasukan Jihad also withdrew west to Akelamo. Several thousand Muslims at this
point abandoned the attempt to reach Kao, deterred by the strong response taken by
security forces in the area, and returned home to Ternate, but approximately 2,000
militia members, mostly from Tidore but also some IDPs from Malifut, remained
in Akelamo.
The Kaos made several efforts to end the conflict over this period. In late
January the Team of Nine Kao representatives presented a letter to the security
forces stating their desire for peace, but warning that if the Pasukan Jihad entered
the area they would be attacked. The Team of Nine also reassured the predomi-
nantly Javanese, and Muslim, transmigrants still living in the sub-district that they
would not be harmed. The sole Kao member of the North Maluku District
162 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
Parliament travelled to Tobelo to telephone the government in Ternate and request
that it order the Pasukan Jihad to withdraw from the area.84
As mujahid reinforcements arrived in the Malifut area in February, bringing the
total number of militia members to approximately 5,000, the security forces
continued to separate the two militias and prevent any major clashes. However, the
military did allow the Pasukan Jihad to destroy at least two unoccupied Kao
villages in western Malifut. Because the military commander had informed the
Kao militia that the villages would be protected and that they, the Kaos, should
withdraw, these events served to confirm to the Kaos the need to provide for their
own security.
As well as taking action to prevent fighting in Malifut, the government and the
security forces from this point on took a harder line on preventing further militia
from leaving Ternate for Sidangoli. Their plans to attack Kao seemingly thwarted,
the Makian members of the Pasukan Jihad leadership spent this period pressuring
the provincial government to provide for the return of the Makian IDPs to Malifut
so they could start rebuilding their homes. Abu Bakar Wahid negotiated directly
with the army commander in North Maluku, Lt Col. Sutrisno, requesting that he
allow the Pasukan Jihad to return to Malifut. The commander refused this request,
perhaps concerned that, in reality, the militia sought to attack Kao. When several
thousand mujahid did attempt to leave Ternate once more on 5 May, army troops
from Infantry Battalion 732 fired on the militia, killing five mujahid. The response
to this incident demonstrated that support for the jihad was not universal in
Ternate. According to an Australian staff member from NHM, a petition was
presented to the commander of the unit with the names of 500 Muslim Ternate citi-
zens supporting the action taken against the Pasukan Jihad.
Those groups that did manage to leave Ternate were stopped by security forces
around Malifut or were deterred by the large Kao militia. On 18 May approxi-
mately 2,000 mujahid managed to leave Ternate and travelled by truck from
Sidangoli to Akelamo. There, however, this group was stopped by army personnel
and returned to Sidangoli,85 although perhaps 1,000 Makian IDPs who had crossed
over with them remained in West Malifut waiting for permission to return to their
homes. In June a small group of Kaos killed approximately ten mujahid as they
were bathing in a river in the forest, in Tanjung Barnabas. The Pasukan Jihad once
more retreated westward from Malifut.86 This was the last confrontation between
the two forces in the Kao/Malifut area, the security forces having separated the two
militias during each attempted attack by the Pasukan Jihad. Most of the several
thousand mujahid who had been in Malifut returned to Ternate. It seems likely
that, by early June, the Makian leaders of the Pasukan Jihad had resigned them-
selves to not reaching Kao, and the Makian IDPs had grown tired of the dangers in
the area.
After several failed attempts to militarily defeat the Kaos, Abu Bakar Wahid
attempted to bring hostilities to an end and initiate reconciliation between the
Makians and Kaos, meeting Kao leaders such as Jesaja Singa and Hersen
Tinangon in Malifut in the presence of military personnel. Part of the motivation to
start reconciliation talks was provided by a statement by the district head that the
Killing in the name of God 163
government would begin returning Makian IDPs to their homes in villages west of
Malifut. Following the attempts at reconciliation by Abu Bakar Wahid, the
Pasukan Jihad began to divide into a faction surrounding Wahid and one
surrounding Muhammad Selang. This schism appears to have occurred for two
reasons. The latter stated that he disagreed with any reconciliation with Christians
on Halmahera until all Muslims could safely return to their homes. Second,
animosity appears to have developed between the two groups over the disappear-
ance of funding. Selang accused Abu Bakar Wahid and other leaders of not
dispersing funding they had received from external sources and from the local
North Maluku community.87
The Pasukan Jihad’s attempts to attack and destroy Kao therefore appear to
have failed largely because of the efforts of army personnel in the area. The mili-
tary present, including external personnel from Brawijaya 512, a company from
the Surabaya-based military command (Kodam), appear to have provided a strong
deterrent to large-scale attacks, although the two militias did clash on several occa-
sions. As will be seen, this professional response did not occur in Galela. The
Pasukan Jihad also appears to have been deterred by the large number of Pasukan
Merah in Kao. The Kao militia had been reinforced by hundreds of Tobelos.88
Throughout these attempts by the Pasukan Jihad to attack Kao, Muslim Kaos
fought alongside Christians against the Muslim militia.
Galela
As discussed in Chapter 5, after the conflict in Galela in December 1999, perhaps
several thousand Christians had remained in the sub-district, mostly in the adjacent
villages of Duma, Dokulamo, Soatobaru and Makete around the western shore of
Lake Duma (See Map 5.2). These communities possessed strong village militia
which prevented Muslims returning to these and neighbouring villages. Another
Christian community remained in Mamuya, restricting any return to villages in the
south of the sub-district, such as Luari. Several thousand Muslims remained in the
sub-district capital, Soasio, and nearby villages such as Igobula, similarly
restricting the movement of Christians through the area and thereby between
Galela and Tobelo. From January to March, the area between Igobula and Duma in
Galela Sub-District was the site of frequent clashes between Muslims and the
Christians. The Christian Duma militia and the Al Istiklama Muslim militia from
Igobula launched frequent tit for tat attacks on the strongholds of the other commu-
nity.89
While Christians in Galela were isolated from the much larger Christian popula-
tion in Tobelo, some Christian militia members attempted to go to Duma to assist
their co-religionists. Small groups of Christian militia members, mostly from the
village of Wari, travelled from the village of Mamuya in the south of Galela
through the mountainous area to Duma.90 This group also travelled to Loloda and
Ibu Sub-Districts to help Christians resist Muslim attacks. On one trip through the
forest around a dozen Christians were ambushed by the Al Istiklama militia from
Igobula and suffered several casualties.91 In January, Christians from Tobelo made
164 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
several more large-scale attempts to reach the Christians in Galela. However, mili-
tary reinforcements (Brawijaya 512) had installed a major roadblock at Pintu Batu
immediately south of Soasio and forcefully repelled the Christian advance. During
one attempt to pass the military guard post, military personnel shot several
members of the Pasukan Merah.92
While the Pasukan Jihad was attempting to attack Kao and return the Malifut
community to their homes, a much larger section of the militia was preparing in
Ternate to travel to Morotai and the sub-districts of Galela and Tobelo. The
majority of this militia consisted of people displaced by the violence in those areas
in late 1999. For example approximately 700 men from the large Tobelo village of
Gorua returned to Galela.93 In Soasio, local Muslim leaders coordinated the arrival
of thousands of Muslim men from Ternate and Tidore, providing accommodation
and food. A local man, Samsul Bakhri, became the leader of the Pasukan Jihad in
Galela. The two remaining pockets of Christians, in Mamuya and around Lake
Duma, were the initial target of the Pasukan Jihad arriving in Soasio. The large
numbers of Muslim men from Tobelo Sub-District who returned to Galela with the
Pasukan Jihad also hoped to attack Tobelo City.94
The first major operation by the Pasukan Jihad in Galela was a simultaneous
attack against the villages of Makete and Soatobaru just after dawn on Sunday 5
March. This attack was repelled by these villages, reinforced by Christians from
Duma, although one person was killed and approximately 15 injured.95 At 4 p.m.
on 25 May the Pasukan Jihad attacked the more isolated Christian village of
Mamuya near the Tobelo border. According to villagers, approximately 3,000
members of the Pasukan Jihad were involved, including many from Morotai.96
The militia attacked Mamuya both from the road from Soasio and from the sea.
Christians in Mamuya were able to repel the attack for approximately three hours
before fleeing along the road south to Tobelo or through the mountains inland from
the village. Twenty-two Christians were killed in the attack, including four
women.97 Estimates of the number of mujahid killed in the attack vary. According
to Mamuya Christians, a large number died in the attack, although a young Tidore
man tasked with collecting the corpses of mujahid during the Pasukan Jihad oper-
ations stated that only eight militia members died and three more were missing
after the clash.98
After the attack on Mamuya, the Pasukan Jihad focused on the village of Duma.
Christians in Duma state that their village was attacked 19 times from the first
conflict in late December to the end of June 2000. Over this period, the communi-
ties of Duma, Makete and Soatobaru faced a great deal of deprivation. Isolated
from Tobelo and afraid to walk to their plantations outside the village, the villagers
had become very short of food. To defend itself against attack, Duma established
well-organized defences surrounding the village, including hundreds of small pits
filled with sharpened stakes. After the arrival of the Pasukan Jihad in Galela, the
village suffered three main attacks. On 19 May approximately 2,000 members of
the Pasukan Jihad attacked Duma. The Christians repelled the attack but around
40 per cent of the houses on one edge of the village were destroyed.
On 29 May the Pasukan Jihad launched another major attack against Duma.
Killing in the name of God 165
According to both mujahid and Christian witnesses, a torrential downpour began
as the attack started, causing the bombs prepared by the Pasukan Jihad to fail to
explode. The attack was a dramatic failure. Several dozen mujahid died, many
after falling on the stakes surrounding the village, others shot with firearms or
arrows.99 The failure of the attack may also partly be explained by animosity
between local and external members of the Pasukan Jihad. Several local Muslims
stated that for this attack they had demanded that only local Galela Muslims partic-
ipate, as they claimed men from Tidore, Ternate and elsewhere became frightened
during the violence and undermined morale among the local members of the
militia.
At 4 p.m. on 18 June the commander of the military personnel guarding Duma
informed a local Christian leader, Samuel Kukus, that the village would soon face
another major attack and that the Pasukan Jihad had gathered in Makete.100
According to Kukus, the commander reassured him that his unit would prevent the
Pasukan Jihad from reaching the village. Although the Christian militia was
divided between Duma and the neighbouring village of Dokulamo, the Christians
felt the number of military personnel guarding the two villages, along with their
own militia, was sufficient to repel the Pasukan Jihad. After preparing the Chris-
tian militia in Duma, Samuel Kukus inspected the border of the village and discov-
ered the corpses of several mujahid who had already fallen on the stakes placed
around the village. After noting that the military were manning all guard posts
around the village, the Christian militia members rested in anticipation of an attack
the following day.
However, when the Pasukan Jihad launched a massive attack on 19 June, the
military offered no resistance.101 Christian respondents in Duma state that when
the Pasukan Jihad began their attack at approximately 10 a.m., the military aban-
doned their posts on the edge of the village and withdrew behind the Pasukan
Jihad.102 Christians and Muslims offered quite different explanations for the
failure to prevent the attack. These are considered later in the chapter.
Most respondents agree that approximately 10,000 Pasukan Jihad attacked
Duma. Christians fought to prevent them from entering the central part of the
village. Some men remained in their houses, attempting to defend them with
homemade bazookas and other weapons, but after a short period of time the entire
community that remained in the village, over a thousand people, was driven back
towards the large village church. Women and children sheltered inside the church
while men attempted to defend the surrounding grounds with homemade firearms,
spears and bows and arrows. Only one man, Samuel Kukus, possessed an auto-
matic firearm. According to Christians in Duma, three soldiers from a military post
in Bale rowed across the lake to attempt to defend the Christian community, firing
on the attacking mujahid.
After approximately six hours, and with the village almost completely overrun,
the Pasukan Jihad ceased the attack. It seems likely that they halted the attack
because of the arrival of a unit of Indonesian marines from Soasio. The arrival of
these additional troops appears to have motivated the Brawijaya 512 personnel
stationed at Duma to begin to resist the Pasukan Jihad’s attack. The leader of the
166 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
militia gave orders to halt the attack and for the militia to withdraw so that the
Christians could be evacuated. The marines then used trucks to evacuate all Chris-
tians from Duma and Dokulamo to Tobelo on 20 June. The Pasukan Jihad ceased
its attack in part because of the arrival of military reinforcements which were intent
on halting further Christian casualties and in part because its defeat of Duma was
already complete.
Approximately 250 Christians died in the attacks on Duma, most during the
largest and final attack on 19 June. A graveyard now occupies most of the grounds
of the church, which lies in ruins. The entire village of Duma, as with the villages
surrounding it, was destroyed. The Pasukan Jihad ravaged the gardens owned by
the residents of Duma and the surrounding villages, chopping down coconut and
other trees.103 Respondents on each side disagree on the number of mujahid who
died during the conflict in Galela. According to Muhammad Selang, who led the
Pasukan Jihad, approximately 200 mujahid were killed in operations on
Halmahera. Christians who were in Duma estimated the number to be far higher.
One Christian militia leader estimated that perhaps 3,000 mujahid died in attacks
against the villages around Duma. The likely total, not calculated by local govern-
ment or any other agencies, is probably closer to the smaller figure. One imam
from Tidore involved with the Pasukan Jihad died in an attack on Duma.104
Respondents from both sides of the conflict said militia members killed women
and children, including some who had already surrendered, often in front of mili-
tary personnel. Unsurprisingly, members of both communities denied that they, or
others from their group, carried out such actions. Members of the Pasukan Jihad
stated that imams and religious teachers had forbidden the killing of any
non-combatant. However, one mujahid acknowledged that an indeterminate
number of women and children were killed during fighting or accidentally by
bombs. It seems likely, however, given the large number of casualties, including
women and children, that such practices were carried out by both sides. 105
Respondents from both parties to the 2000 conflict in Galela said members of
the opposing militia used narcotics during the violence, both claiming to have
found pills on the corpses of their enemies. These pills had allegedly been stamped
with names such as ‘Mad Dog’. Muslims also recounted that when they cut the
skin of Christian militia members they would bleed very slowly because of the
drug. Christians claimed that Muslims acted exceedingly bravely for approxi-
mately an hour, at which point they would flee, seemingly because the effects of
the narcotic had worn off.106 The veracity of these claims is difficult to establish,
but given the prevalence of amphetamine and other narcotics in pill form
throughout South-east Asia, their use during the violence in North Maluku is
possible.
Conclusion
The Pasukan Jihad was created as a direct result of the intense violence that
occurred in Tobelo and Galela in late December 1999. The events in Tobelo in
particular stimulated widespread anger, and the leaders of the Pasukan Putih
declared that Muslims must wage jihad to defeat the Christians who they claimed
were attempting to expel all Muslims from north Halmahera. The presence of the
existing militia, the Pasukan Putih, made organization relatively simple. Yet
recruitment, training and the collection of adequate funding for transport and other
costs took several months to complete. In addition, religious ideology was neces-
sary to facilitate widespread recruitment of Muslims not directly affected by the
violence. Religious and community leaders deliberately reiterated the principles of
jihad, including an obligation to protect Muslims under attack from non-Muslims.
However, while leaders framed their campaign within the principles of jihad,
the militia did not espouse broader Islamic goals such as the implementation of
Islamic law (sharia). The militia’s main leader also proclaimed that his primary
goal was to defend the integrity of the Indonesian state from separatists. In addi-
tion, for many participants in the militia religious ideology merely provided
symbolism and ideological certitude for their campaign to achieve more worldly
goals. Many, if not most, of the mujahid came from Tobelo, Galela and Malifut
and first and foremost sought retribution for their expulsion by Christians. Partly
because of this local nature of the conflict, but also because Muslims enjoyed such
numerical superiority in North Maluku, the Pasukan Jihad declined the offer of
help from more extreme and militant external Muslim organizations, such as the
Laskar Jihad.
Religion interacted with strategic goals for Christians in north Halmahera in the
same way. The religious element of the conflict added to the strength of emotions
of those defending their homes and families. Many believed they were struggling
for the very existence of Christianity on Halmahera. This sentiment pervaded the
entire community of Tobelo and Galela, facilitating the mobilization of militias
and convincing the Christians of Duma, Soatobaru and nearby villages to stay and
defend themselves. Within this turmoil, many young men who were willing to risk
176 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
their lives to defend their religion attained a status they would otherwise never
enjoy. Despite the influence and visibility of religion in the mobilization of the
militia and ensuing violence, the case demonstrates that some apparently religious
militias are at heart formed as a reaction to specific socio-political contexts rather
than in response to calls for jihad or other transnational ideologies.
The Pasukan Jihad launched two main campaigns on Halmahera. The earliest,
against the community of Kao, was designed to avenge the destruction of Malifut
and return the thousands of Makian IDPs to their homes. The campaign failed
largely because the security forces in the area were effective in preventing clashes.
The professional and forceful response of the military and police was due to the
presence of a gold mine in the area which was extremely valuable to the fledgling
provincial economy.
The second and larger campaign against several Christian village strongholds in
Galela was far more successful. The militia destroyed several of these villages that
were preventing the return of Muslim IDPs to the sub-district. In the absence of
any incentive to prevent the attacks, the security forces did little to protect these
villages, instead concentrating on protecting the Muslim-dominated sub-district
capital, Soasio. The Pasukan Jihad halted operations on Halmahera, giving up the
goal of defeating Christians in the city of Tobelo, for two major reasons. First, the
conquest of that city posed too big a challenge, particularly after attacks against
Kao to the south had failed, meaning that Tobelo could not be attacked from both
north and south. Second, the implementation of a state of civil emergency trig-
gered a more serious attempt by security forces to prevent violence. By July 2000
most North Malukans were finally free from the threat of violence that had
tormented their region for almost a year.
Conclusion
Introduction
On a day when most Indonesians were still celebrating the national Day of Inde-
pendence, two ethnic communities began fighting in the area of Malifut. Two
months later, an entire sub-district lay in ruins, its population displaced. By the end
of the year, political and religious tensions reached their apogee as thousands of
militia members fought in different areas of the province. For the next six months
North Maluku was paralyzed, the security forces abandoning entire swathes of the
archipelago to the violent campaigns of religious militias.
The horror of nearly one year of violence came to an end in July 2000. The
conflict had left over 3,000 dead, and innumerable people maimed and trauma-
tized. Photographs which are too graphic to display in this book show bodies
disembowelled, decapitated and burned. Much of the new province, particularly
the largest island of Halmahera, lay in ruins. The relationship between Christians
and Muslims in the region, long characterized by harmony and cooperation, was
now dominated by suspicion and hatred.
This study has been an attempt to understand such terrible violence. The
preceding chapters have provided a comprehensive account of the initiation and
trajectory of the conflict in North Maluku, and uncovered the range of structural
forces and human agency involved. Each chapter focused on a major development
within the conflict. After summarizing the background to the violence, this chapter
reviews the findings of this study regarding each phase: initiation, escalation,
dispersion, political exploitation and eventual religious war. In addition, addi-
tional consideration is given to the question of opportunity – how was violence
allowed to occur in a country then facing many problems but far from being a
failing state? A second section demonstrates the mutually reinforcing nature of
structure, elite and mass agency, interest, emotion and identity in the conflict. By
way of special illustration the section discusses the role of religion in the violence.
The chapter ends by assessing the implications of this study for the methodological
approach to the study of inter-communal conflict.
178 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
From harmony to bloodshed: the North Maluku conflict
Initiation
Decades of peaceful, if not altogether friendly relations between the migrant
Makians and indigenous Kaos suddenly became confrontational with the
announcement that a new sub-district would be formed in Malifut. While it would
incorporate several Kao villages, the sub-district was clearly designed to serve the
interests of the local Makian community. The new sub-district would not only
increase the territory allocated to the Makians under the terms of their original
relocation, but would formally end the uncertainty associated with continuing Kao
claims to the area. The location of the Gosowong gold mine within the new
sub-district would also mean the Makian community would monopolize employ-
ment and other benefits associated with that resource. As an autonomous
sub-district, Malifut also suddenly became a viable option to serve as a capital of
one of the new districts that would make up the new North Maluku province. This
eventuality would provide a major financial windfall to the community under new
decentralization laws that were to come into effect in January 2001.
The Kaos refused to accept the new sub-district for several reasons. They were
concerned at the loss of the gold mine, believed the sub-district and its boundaries
infringed their traditional land rights and communal integrity and were angered at
the lack of consultation prior to the government decision. All of these factors inter-
acted to give their objections an emotive character. But the Makian community and
government officials, many of whom were Makians, paid little heed to their
concerns.
Long-standing political structures associated with the previous authoritarian
order therefore exacerbated this dispute. When, through the ethnic nepotism that
had become prevalent in local government in New Order Indonesia, one commu-
nity was seen to monopolize the impending benefits of democratization and finan-
cial decentralization, the volatility of local politics increased markedly. Makians in
the North Maluku District government and bureaucracy used their dominant repre-
sentation in those institutions to bypass the Kaos in a decision that directly and
profoundly affected them. After almost two months of attempting to gain legal
recourse against the Makians for the destruction of their two villages in August, the
Kaos resorted to violent action. The status and leadership of local militia leaders
was crucial in this decision and its implementation.
The imbalance in political influence between the two communities also embold-
ened some Makians to take a more ‘non-institutionalized’ and aggressive stance
towards the Kaos in Malifut. With the sub-district already recognized by the
central government in Jakarta, Makians in Malifut and Ternate ignored the Kaos’
objections and mobilized a group of students to pressure them into acceptance.
After sustained Kao opposition, and increasing belligerence on the part of
members of both communities, Makians from Malifut, led by these students from
outside Malifut, attacked and destroyed two Kao villages.
180 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
Had the North Maluku District government responded impartially to this first
incident, it is likely the conflict would have ended at this point. However, the
Kaos’ demands for compensation received little response, again owing largely to
the influence of the Makians in the district government and bureaucracy. Bias
within government also meant that, suffering from a lack of political representa-
tion, the Kaos were more likely to engage in ‘non-institutionalized’ strategies.
Their most immediate motivation was anger at the destruction of the two Kao
villages. They were also angered and frustrated by the government’s lack of impar-
tiality, as well as their own lack of success in overturning the creation of the
sub-district through institutionalized processes. These factors exacerbated their
already strong sense of grievance over what they saw as the violation of their tradi-
tional ownership of Malifut, and by extension their legitimate claim to some
benefit from the gold mine at Gosowong. Thus disempowered, those Kaos calling
for more retributive action assumed greater influence and, in October, some 5,000
Kaos attacked and destroyed the new sub-district.
This analysis demonstrates that structures of political and economic inequality
between two communities can play an underlying role in the outbreak of
communal violence, as asserted by Horowitz and others. In this case, the issue of
territory went to the heart of the unequal relationship between the Kaos and the
Makians. During the previous two decades, the Kaos had been disempowered rela-
tive to the Makians in all but their indigenous rights over the territory in and around
Malifut. While land was very important to the well-being and identity of the Kaos,
it was the additional importance of that land in their relative position to the Makian
that explains the intensity of Kao opposition. Put differently, ownership of terri-
tory was their only source of relative superiority and pride over the Makian. In line
with Horowitz’s conclusions drawn from his wide-ranging study of ethnic
violence, the Kaos were reluctant to relinquish what little power they did hold rela-
tive to their more ‘advanced’ neighbours.2
Yet, demonstrating the multifaceted links between inequality and violence, in
this case it was the more empowered and economically successful group which
initiated violence. When attacking Sosol and Wangeotak, the Makians were to
some extent acting out of a sense of disenfranchisement, a lack of legitimate rights
to the land on which they had lived for two decades. But in all other respects the
Makians were relatively powerful. Chapter 3 demonstrated that it was their
perceived greater power vis-à-vis the Kaos, in particular their sense of immunity
from prosecution arising from high-level political support, that to a large extent
explained the violence.
Analysis of the Malifut case also sounds a note of caution about placing too
much importance on economic factors as the primary cause of violent conflict. A
cursory examination of the conflagration in Malifut may suggest that the violence
stemmed wholly or primarily from competition for the benefits of the mine in
Gosowong. Both communities in the dispute had a material interest in this lucra-
tive resource in the form of employment and funding for the community. Yet the
emotional character of the dispute, and therefore the resort to violence, cannot be
explained by reference to these interests alone. A confluence of disputed territorial
Conclusion 181
and mineral rights, threats to ethnic unity and government bias explains the
emotive character of the confrontation and the decision to use violence.
Escalation
The Kaos’ attack on and destruction of Malifut displaced thousands of Makians,
who fled to Ternate. These events, and the plight of the refugees, angered many
Makians in Ternate and several Makian leaders quickly focused on retaliating
against the few Kaos residing in Ternate. At the same time, Makians, both from
Malifut and elsewhere, all of whom were Muslims, tried to portray the attack by
the mainly Christian Kaos as religiously motivated, alleging that mosques were
destroyed and the Qur’an desecrated. There was little evidence to support these
assertions and they appear to have been a means of soliciting sympathy and
support from Muslims of other ethnicities. However, most other ethnic groups,
including Muslims, continued to see the clash in Malifut as a local dispute over
territory and natural resources, and few sympathized with the Makians’ plans to
seek retribution. Few non-Makian Muslims joined their demonstrations or their
attempt to depart for Halmahera. This lack of support allowed the security forces to
prevent the Makians both from leaving Ternate and from rioting in the city.
In response to the influx of refugees and a rising number of disturbances, the
Sultan of Ternate sent his traditional guards, the Pasukan Kuning, on to the streets
equipped with spears and machetes. Although the sultan declared that this decision
was necessary to protect the infrastructure of the city and the lives of Christian
residents, the sudden appearance of a paramilitary presence on the streets, loyal
only to the sultan, worried his political opponents. To them, the sultan appeared to
be assuming control of the city as a deliberate strategy in the run-up to gubernato-
rial elections the following year, augmenting his already dominant political posi-
tion. In this way, political considerations became entwined with the looming
ethnic and religious tension in the province. Those Makians trying to provoke
anti-Christian rioting formed an alliance with several other political rivals of the
sultan’s who hoped to undermine his growing dominance. Together these individ-
uals pressured the district police commander to release a group of Makians
arrested for attacking a Christian church.
In the following days, several Makian leaders stepped up their campaign to
portray the Kaos’ attack as religiously motivated. The main element of this
campaign was the ‘Bloody Sosol’ letter that was authored in, and disseminated
from, Ternate in the final days of October and purportedly proved the existence of
a Christian conspiracy to drive Muslims from Halmahera. Several days after the
circulation of this letter, rioting broke out on Tidore and soon spread to Ternate.
Mobs attacked and killed Christians and destroyed their homes, shops and
churches. This was the first rioting explicitly based on religion.
Chapter 4 examined why Christians became the target of this violence despite
the Malifut dispute having had little connection to religious differences. In addi-
tion, the chapter analyzed why it was possible for violence to break out in the
provincial capital, where the hundreds of armed security personnel present should
182 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
have been able to halt the rioting mobs, who possessed no automatic weapons. The
events in Tidore and Ternate added inter-religious tension to the greater conflict
and caused violence to spread across the province. The analysis of these events
therefore presents an example of how a small dispute between ethnic communities
can escalate into religious war.
Many studies of communal rioting conclude that particular cases of ethnic or
religious rioting are spontaneous eruptions of outrage at the barbaric stories found
in rumours and other forms of propaganda.3 These rumours often take on a form of
agency themselves, largely denuding the actors involved of any responsibility.
Most studies of the events in Tidore and Ternate concur with this understanding of
riots, seeing them as an eruption of Muslim anger at the contents of the ‘Bloody
Sosol’ letter.4 However, Chapter 4 demonstrated that it is important not to over-
state the role of rumours and propaganda in instigating communal violence. Even
in cases where propaganda appears to have ignited violence, close investigation
may reveal greater intent and less suggestibility on the part of those involved. In
such cases, rumours and propaganda are designed principally to make rioting that
has been meticulously planned appear spontaneous, and should not be considered
a cause of rioting themselves.
In the attacks in Ternate and Tidore, almost all those participating in the initial
violence were Makians, angered at the events in Malifut. These people sought to
riot against Christians even in the absence of the ‘Bloody Sosol’ letter. They
targeted Christians in general, and not just Kaos, because they believed that GMIH
must have been involved in organizing the Kaos’ attack and because they had been
prevented from departing for Halmahera. Once Makians had initiated violence in
Tidore, the conflict accelerated as individuals from other ethnic groups began to
participate. Some did so in order to loot properties, others perhaps merely for the
thrill of engaging in violence and destruction. The sight of burning churches and
houses also convinced some Muslims that the conflict was indeed about religion.
Most ‘late arrivals’ had also identified a high level of political support that would
obviate any punishment.
If the rioting in the provincial capital cannot be explained purely as the sponta-
neous response of outraged Muslims, some other change must have occurred in the
capital after late October, when the security forces prevented the crowds of
Makians from burning churches and leaving for Halmahera. Chapter 4 illustrated
that the difference between the situation in October and that in November was the
almost complete retreat of the security forces from the city’s streets. This was facil-
itated by an alliance of influential figures forged by Malifut’s destruction and the
sultan’s increasing dominance of the city. Those seeking to retaliate against Chris-
tians in the city allied with politicians whose main goal was to undermine the
sultan. The resulting political pressure on, and immobilization of, the security
forces was a more important contributor to the riots than the ‘Bloody Sosol’ letter
and other propaganda. This allowed those Makians seeking to take out their anger
on Christians to do so with impunity. The sultan’s rivals saw political benefit in
these riots because, as a traditional protector of minorities in the region and reliant
on Christian support in his gubernatorial ambitions, the sultan was forced to
Conclusion 183
defend Christians during the rioting. This protection of Christians then became a
main source of mobilization for his political rivals as they sought his demise in late
December.
It was therefore the violence itself, particularly the killing of a pastor and the
destruction of churches, facilitated by elites seeking to obtain political advantage
from sectarian tension and not the ‘Bloody Sosol’ letter that acted as the catalyst
for real religious violence. These acts, and the political Machiavellianism behind
them, explain the escalation from local border dispute into provincial religious
conflict. These riots ultimately brought the two faiths in the region into bloody
confrontation.
Dispersion
After the anti-Christian rioting in Tidore and Ternate, violence spread to almost
every area of North Maluku.5 Ethnic groups divided along religious lines in areas
across Halmahera, Bacan, Morotai and other islands. In some cases, members of
the same family fought against each other. Chapter 5 analyzed how violence
spread throughout the region by examining in detail the cases of Tobelo and Galela
Sub-Districts in north Halmahera.
The killing of a pastor and the targeting of defenceless Christians in Tidore and
Ternate dramatically changed the nature of the conflict throughout the region. The
nature of the violence there led people elsewhere in the province to believe the
region was now in the grip of religious conflict between Muslims and Christians.
Christians were infuriated at the events in the two district capitals and angered and
concerned that the security forces had not intervened to halt the riots. Both
Muslims and Christians were increasingly afraid that their neighbours would
attack them. Tobelo, as the main Christian centre in North Maluku, was addition-
ally affected by the influx of thousands of Christian refugees from Ternate and
rural areas in Central Halmahera.
A spiral of insecurity ensued in Tobelo and Galela. Both sides prepared
weapons and bombs and assumed a more belligerent demeanour towards followers
of the other religion. Heightened tensions gave militant members of each commu-
nity increased status, while at the same time any individuals or groups seeking to
reconcile the two communities were marginalized and intimidated. The nature of
the violence elsewhere meant that many individuals emphasized their religious
identity and solidarity in a militant fashion. This ‘security dilemma’ led almost
inexorably towards violence in the area.
But security dilemmas do not in themselves cause communal violence. Certain
interests and actions played crucial roles in converting this atmosphere of tension
into violence. Perhaps because of the increased status that the confrontational situ-
ation afforded them, or for more material reasons (such as protection money),
certain individuals deliberately attempted to intimidate and provoke members of
the opposing community. For example, the brother of Benny Bitjara attempted on
one occasion to instigate fighting in Tobelo City. The decision by unknown
Muslim leaders to commission the tailoring of white robes, presumably as a means
184 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
to demonstrate the solidarity and strength of local Muslims, exacerbated tension in
the city. Other actions that were merely ill advised, such as the transportation of
Christian men into the city to guard the GMIH compound, also led to the outbreak
on 26 December.
In the case of Tobelo, the security dilemma was in part facilitated by incompe-
tence and a fear of exacerbating the situation on the part of the security forces. The
police and military rarely took action against individuals clearly acting as provoca-
teurs. Many were local personnel and felt pressure not to act against their own
community. Had the security forces acted more forcefully it seems likely that
violence might have been averted. Their visible presence on the streets would have
assuaged the insecurity felt among the ordinary population and provided security
for shops, thus taking away the interest some militia leaders had in continuing
volatility. In Galela, the security forces made little effort to prevent violence in the
villages around Lake Duma.
The violence in Tobelo, particularly the attacks of Christians, was particularly
intense because of a confluence of factors. The religious sensitivity of both
communities and the involvement of Protestant pastors in the violence increased a
sense among Christians that violence against their enemies was divinely sanc-
tioned and removed any remorse they may have felt at killing non-combatants. But
strategic considerations were also important. Many Christians, particularly militia
leaders, sought to expel Muslims from the sub-district before they could regroup
and ally with sympathetic security personnel. Through such brutal violence they
also sought to deter Muslims from returning to the area.
Numerous clashes broke out across North Maluku in the aftermath of the riots in
Tidore and Ternate. Not all were the result of increased security concerns. Many
involved more calculated attacks by one community against another, in some cases
assisted by militias from neighbouring sub-districts or islands. In Tobelo and
Galela, however, the most populous areas outside Ternate and those with the most
evenly divided religious composition, a security dilemma provided fertile ground
for violence, encouraging belligerent actions and exploitation of tensions within
society. In such a situation, provocative and even unconsidered actions, which
would otherwise have been ignored, had dramatic consequences.
Political exploitation
The violence in North Maluku had, until this point, followed a pattern common to
many communal conflicts – a small dispute caused a flow of refugees and inspired
propaganda and revenge attacks which subsequently escalated into a much larger
sectarian conflict. Yet the Putih–Kuning clashes in Ternate in late December
suggested that the conflict in its entirety possessed several strands. While Chris-
tians and Muslims were engaged in intense clashes in Tobelo, Galela and else-
where, Ternate City again descended into violence, this time between two Muslim
factions. The Muslim followers of the Sultan of Ternate fought against Muslims
from the Makian, Tidore and other ethnic groups. This latter group, the Pasukan
Conclusion 185
Putih, was soon reinforced by thousands of men from Tidore Island, and the
sultan’s traditional guards, the Pasukan Kuning, were quickly overrun.
Most analysts assert that the clashes occurred as a result of the Sultan of Ternate
and his armed militia alienating wide sections of the North Maluku community
throughout late 1999. The sultan certainly appears to have engendered animosity
among the migrant communities on Ternate. Claims that he supported the Kaos in
their opposition to the formation of Malifut Sub-District, and his attempt to
prevent Makian refugees being evacuated to Ternate, angered Makians. The
belligerent behaviour of his traditional guards, who were given sanction to patrol
the city’s streets, also increasingly aggrieved many Tidores and other migrants
living in the city. The Pasukan Kuning’s destruction of Kampung Pisang marked
the apex of this tension and caused many people to take to the streets in opposition
to the sultan’s militia
Nevertheless, much of the Putih–Kuning conflict suggests that it was far from
spontaneous. Mobilization for action against the sultan had already been underway
before the Kampung Pisang incident took place. This mobilization was coordi-
nated by the sultan’s political opponents, who were concerned at his growing
political and strategic hegemony over the city and, by extension, the new province.
The sultan’s strong position in December, along with his previous support for the
Kaos in the Malifut dispute, had united almost all other leading political figures
and their supporters against him. In Ternate and Tidore, clients of the sultan’s main
rivals mobilized militias with the goal of ousting the Pasukan Kuning from the
streets of Ternate and overthrowing the sultan as a political force. While inter-reli-
gious violence raged elsewhere in the province, Muslims divided into ethnic
factions and fought street battles as they determined the future balance of political
power in the region.
After several decades of authoritarian and non-democratic governance, intimi-
dation remained a common means of achieving political or economic outcomes.
Both leading factions in competition for political power in the new province used
intimidation and militia violence to prevent a loss in power and undermine rivals.
In dispatching his Pasukan Kuning on to the streets of Ternate, Mudaffar Syah
undoubtedly sought to enhance his own political position. He hoped to win public
support for protecting important infrastructure, while at the same time achieving
strategic control over political, social and economic activity in the city. Similarly,
threatened by his rising power, the sultan’s rivals mobilized militias to oppose him.
Both parties also exercised political pressure on the security forces, undermining
the neutrality that might have allowed them to halt rioting in its early stages.
Several points of convergence exist between the building tension in Ternate and
Tidore in late 1999, which culminated in the Putih–Kuning conflict, and the ‘insti-
tutionalized riot systems’ that Brass has identified as existing in some cities of
India. By late 1999 the ongoing violence in North Maluku had become entwined
with a political process which had implications for thousands of individuals in
Ternate. During this period, several individuals, self-proclaimed defenders of the
community, exploited communal tension to weaken the Sultan of Ternate as a
political force. In particular, the sultan’s alleged support of Christians, ignoring the
186 Ethno-Religious Violence in Indonesia
interests of Muslims provided an effective means of mobilizing wider opposition
against him.
As Wilkinson, Tambiah and Brass have demonstrated in the case of India, when
communal tensions become caught up in political processes in this way, the secu-
rity forces may become less willing to halt violence. In Ternate, military and police
commanders appeared unwilling to intervene in the violence for fear of political
consequences. The future power holders in the province would be capable not only
of exercising influence on the careers of military and police commanders but also
of hindering the economic activities of local units. This concern affected the
response of military and police commanders from November 1999 to the end of the
conflict in June 2000, as discussed further below.
Taken in the context of the wider North Maluku conflict, the Putih–Kuning
clashes illustrate the complexity and depth of issues present in a case of communal
violence involving several events. First, the fighting demonstrates the pitfalls of
imputing too much uniformity to ethnic or religious communities in the analysis of
violence. Violence between Muslim factions showed that religion was only one of
several ruptures in North Maluku society during the conflict. The clashes also
demonstrate that the phases of a conflict may differ markedly from each other,
depending not only on local political and social contexts, but also the use and
exploitation of previous events by influential actors.
Religious war
Within the space of just four months, what had begun as a dispute over territory
had escalated into full-scale religious war. The tensions between Muslims in
Ternate dissipated as floods of refugees from Tobelo and Galela arrived in the city,
recounting tales of unprovoked Christian attacks and the terrible deaths of
hundreds of defenceless people in mosques. Angry refugees from Halmahera
called for retaliation against Christians. Originally formed for political goals, the
Pasukan Putih assumed a more religious character and was renamed the Pasukan
Jihad. The militia swelled as other Muslims who had opposed the anti-Christian
rioting in November joined out of fury at the events in Tobelo. With the subse-
quent mobilization framed in the terms of jihad, Muslim Ternates and Tidores,
having only recently ceased fighting each other, became allies to exact revenge on
Christians and to allow their co-religionists from north Halmahera to return to their
homes. The earlier claims of several Muslim politicians that Muslims faced the
threat of Christian aggression appeared to have been borne out. The violence in
Tobelo achieved what the Kaos had taken a great deal of effort to avoid in their
attack against Malifut – it united the North Maluku Muslim community against
Christians in the province.
The militia formed over several months and divided into two groups. One
attempted unsuccessfully to reach Kao Sub-District, where military personnel
prevented major clashes between the militia and the Kao. The other launched a
series of attacks against the remaining Christian villages in Galela Sub-District. It
disbanded after destroying several villages and expelling all Christians from
Conclusion 187
Galela. In Malifut, the security forces were largely effective in preventing clashes
between mujahid and the Kaos in an effort to avoid too much disruption to the
NHM mining operations, which provided so much revenue to the provincial
coffers. In Galela, however, with little financial incentive to prevent violence, and
no directive from the main civilian power holders in Ternate to do so, and with
many soldiers apparently sympathizing with the Pasukan Jihad, Christians were
often forced to provide their own protection.
Through its campaign and rhetoric, the Pasukan Jihad appeared to fit into the
rising tide of Islamic militancy in Indonesia in 2000. However, the militia was very
local in both participation and goals. The militia leadership refused the assistance
of the Laskar Jihad, the Java-based militia that would become prominent in the
conflict in Maluku, and few men from outside the province joined the violence in
North Maluku. The analysis in Chapter 7 suggests that the Pasukan Jihad had
different goals from the Laskar Jihad and other more radical groups. However,
also important in their refusal of assistance from Laskar Jihad was their belief that
they already possessed overwhelming force relative to Christians in the region.
Religion was only one of several motivations for attacks on Christians, as
discussed further below. Nevertheless, the principles of jihad did provide a
unifying banner under which to mobilize Muslims from all ethnic groups.
The violence ended for several reasons. The implementation of civil emergency
in the province by the central government increased the legality of firmer action by
the security forces against combatants. Shock at the sinking of the Cahaya Bahari
also diminished the motivation of many members of the Pasukan Jihad to continue
fighting, and many combatants had grown weary of the violence. Yet the principal
reason fighting stopped in July 2000 was the now complete separation of Chris-
tians and Muslims in the region into exclusive zones after almost a year of bloody
violence. The remaining Christian populations in Tobelo and Kao Sub-Districts
appeared to the Pasukan Jihad to be unassailable because of the strength of local
Christian militias and the presence of military contingents to the north and south of
the two areas.
Religion
An analysis of the role of religion in the violence in North Maluku amply demon-
strates the interaction of rational and affective influences in motivating those
involved in violence. In general this study concurs with those analysts who
conclude that religion is most often not a cause of violence, but is sometimes used
as a tool by provocateurs seeking to stimulate inter-religious tension for their own
more worldly goals.7 Religion played very little role in the initial outbreak in
Malifut, which was essentially a result of competition over territory, made emotive
by ethnic identity and the unequal treatment of communities by the district govern-
ment. The crucial turning point for the conflict came in Ternate and Tidore, where
influential Makians portrayed their ethnic kin in Malifut as victims of Christian
aggression. Yet even in the face of this provocation claims of a campaign of
Christianization in North Maluku were not accepted by most Muslims. But the
actions of these rioters in murdering a pastor, burning churches and expelling and
killing Christians pushed the region towards a sectarian conflict that was defined
and waged almost entirely in terms of religious faith.
Religion, thereafter, played a multifaceted role in determining the trajectory and
intensity of the violence. It was not only used as a tool by those seeking to provoke
violence, but also simultaneously heightened the emotions of combatants, facili-
tated the mobilization of militias, determined the form of that mobilization (the
names, clothing and symbolism used by the militias) and provided the ideology
that sustained those militias in the field.
The use of religious doctrine by men such as Benny Bitjara and Abu Bakar
Wahid to legitimate killing, along with the fears of Christians and Muslims that not
just their lives but also the sustainability of their faith were under threat, made
violence both more likely and more intense. Some of the Muslims involved in the
Pasukan Jihad were motivated by what could be termed jihadist principles – a
desire to defend Islam and defeat those who had attacked Muslims. Among the
Christian community on Halmahera, too, emphasizing Christian solidarity and
religious symbolism were effective means of mobilizing the unity and bravery
necessary to resist the Muslim militia. Many Christians stated that their goal during
the conflict was to ‘defend Jesus’ and several members of the Protestant Church
evoked Christian sentiment in mobilizing combatants.
Yet even in the later stages of the conflict, which appeared so religious in char-
acter, the influence of religion was always contingent on other political, strategic
and economic considerations. The outbreak of violence between Christian and
Muslim Tobelos in late December was caused by a rising sense of insecurity and
intimidation by militants in combination with religious animosity. Similarly, the
Muslim refugees from Tobelo, Galela and Malifut who participated in the Pasukan
Conclusion 193
Jihad did so to seek revenge for attacks by Christians and to return to their homes.
For these people, jihad was primarily a political and strategic vehicle to achieve
these goals, although for others in the militia the sense of waging holy war had real
meaning. Christians also had very real motives (in the form of physical threat) to
mobilize and oppose the Pasukan Jihad. During some important phases of the
conflict, such as the Putih–Kuning clashes in Ternate, religion was only a
peripheral issue.
Throughout the conflict there was no correlation between religiosity and
involvement in violence. Most militia members emphasized their religious identity
and devotion during the conflict, but in times of normality were not the most reli-
giously observant. Many devout Muslims and Christians, including religious
leaders, opposed the violence and attempted to prevent it. On both sides of the
conflict, it was lay people such as Benny Bitjara and Abu Bakar Wahid, far more
than imams or pastors, who used religious symbolism and doctrine to motivate
militia members.
Yet while religion never acted autonomously as a cause of conflict, ignoring its
role completely would preclude a proper understanding of much of the violence in
North Maluku. Throughout the conflict religious sentiment, material interest and
political motives interacted with one another, magnifying and altering the influ-
ence each would have had in isolation. As Jack Snyder, in his consideration of the
causes of war, puts it ‘the effect of each element can be understood only in the
context of the rest of the system.’8 Remove one factor, such as religious tension,
economic inequality or political competition, and in many cases the violence
would not occur.
Introduction
1 This study uses English language terms for the administrative units in Indonesia.
Therefore ‘sub-district’, ‘district’, ‘municipality’ and ‘province’ are used for
kecamatan, kabupaten, kotamadya and provinsi respectively. When talking about
districts and municipalities together, I use the term ‘district’. The term ‘region’ is used
generally to refer to provinces and districts. I also anglicize the names of ethnic
groups; for example when talking about members of an ethnic community, I will use
‘Kaos’ and ‘Makians’ rather than the Indonesian forms, orang Kao and orang
Makian. There are no accepted English terms for these groups and I believe this usage
provides uniformity and deviates from the Indonesian term as little as possible. By
referring to ethnic groups in this way, I also differentiate them from the places after
which they are named, i.e. Kao Sub-District and Makian Island.
2 The local sub-district officials who compiled the figures did not include members of
the Pasukan Jihad who were registered as residents of other administrative areas,
such as Ternate, Tidore, Sanana, etc.
3 Interview with Muhammad Selang in Ternate, 7 February 2004. Mujahid, meaning a
participant in holy war, is the term used by most North Maluku Muslims to refer to
participants in what was widely seen as a jihad.
4 The official statistic for the number of IDPs is 247,620 people. No breakdown of IDPs
by religion was readily available.
5 I use the term Internally Displaced Person (IDP) in this study to refer to a person
displaced within their own country.
6 See the book-length work by K. H. Ahmad and H. Oesman, Damai Yang Terkoyak:
Catatan Kelam dari Bumi Halmahera (Shattered Peace: Dark Notes from the Land of
Halmahera), Ternate: Madani Press, 2000, and J. Nanere, Halmahera Berdarah
(Bloody Halmahera), Ambon: Yayasan Bina Masyarakat Sejahtera dan Pelestarian
Alam (BIMASPELA), 2000. Journal articles and chapters on the conflict include: S.
Alhadar, ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’ in Inside Indonesia, 2000; M. D.
Boediman, ‘Musuhku adalah Saudarku’ (My Enemy is My Brother), unpublished
dissertation, Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana, Yogyakarta, 2002; N. Bubandt,
‘Malukan Apocalypse: Themes in the Dynamics of Violence in Eastern Indonesia’, in
I. Wessel. and G. Wimhofer (eds), Violence in Indonesia, Frankfurt: Abera Verlag
Markus Voss, 2001; N. Bubandt, ‘The Dynamics of Reasonable Paranoia: Rumours
and Riots in North Maluku, 1999–2000’, background paper for presentation at the
Seminar Series of the School of Anthropology, Geography and Environmental
Studies, University of Melbourne, 25 April 2002; N. Bubandt, ‘Towards a New Poli-
tics of Tradition? Decentralisation, Conflict, and Adat in Eastern Indonesia’,
Antropologi Indonesia, no. 74 (May–August 2004); the final section in C. R. Duncan,
198 Notes
‘Savage Imagery: (Mis)representations of the Forest Tobelo of Indonesia’, The Asia
Pacific Journal of Anthropology, vol. 2, no. 1 (2001), 45–62; C. R. Duncan, ‘The
Other Maluku: Chronologies of Conflict in North Maluku’, Indonesia, 80 (October
2005), 53–80; the chapters on North Maluku in I. Hasan (ed.), Memikirkan Kembali:
Maluku dan Maluku Utara (Rethinking: Maluku and North Maluku), Makassar:
Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Hasanuddin (LEPHAS), 2003; T. A. Tomagola,
‘The Bleeding Halmahera of North Moluccas’, Jurnal Studi Indonesia, vol. 10, no. 2
(2000); T. A. Tomagola, ‘Krisis dan Solusi Tragedi Maluku Utara’ (The Crisis and
Solution of the North Maluku Tragedy), Detikcom, 2 February 2000. The following
reports primarily on the Maluku conflict also contain small sections on the North
Maluku conflict: International Crisis Group, Indonesia’s Maluku Crisis: The Issues,
Indonesia Briefing, 19 July 2000; International Crisis Group, Indonesia: Overcoming
Murder and Chaos in Maluku, Asia Report no. 10, 19 December 2000; International
Crisis Group, Indonesia: The Search for Peace in Maluku, Asia Report no. 31, 8
February 2002.
7 The two book-length studies examining a large portion of the conflict, Nanere’s
Halmahera Berdarah and Ahmad and Oesman’s Damai yang Terkoyak, present
strongly Christian and Muslim accounts of the violence respectively. The different
interpretations presented of the conflict, in particular those emanating from the capital
city Ternate, no doubt play a role in displacing responsibility away from those
currently holding power. On the struggle to interpret conflict see P. R. Brass, ‘Intro-
duction: Discourses of Ethnicity, Communalism, and Violence’, in P. R. Brass (ed.),
Riots and Pogroms, New York: New York University Press, 1996.
8 M. Kordi and H. Ghufran, ‘Dinamika Masyarakat Makian Dan Konflik Maluku Utara’
(Makian Societal Dynamics and the North Maluku Conflict), in Hasan, Memikirkan
Kembali, p. 141, Ahmad and Oesman, Damai Yang Terkoyak, p. 121, and M. Kordi and
H. Ghufran, ‘Kompleksitas Konflik Maluku Utara’ (The Complexity of the North
Maluku Conflict), in Hasan, Memikirkan Kembali, p. 127.
9 Tomagola, ‘The Bleeding Halmahera of North Moluccas’.
10 Ibid., p. 7.
11 International Crisis Group, Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku, p. 6.
12 Local communities would actually have exercised little control over this natural
resource which, as discussed in the following chapter, was (and still is) exploited by a
joint venture between an Australian and Indonesian mining company. However, the
mine was still important for those communities living adjacent to the area, in terms of
employment, company donations and other small amounts of revenue.
13 Alhadar, ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’; and S. Alhadar, ‘Kompleksitas
Konflik Di Halmahera Utara’ (The Complexity of the Conflict in North Halmahera),
in Hasan, Memikirkan Kembali, p. 144.
14 Nanere, Halmahera Berdarah, p. 62.
15 Alhadar, ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’.
16 International Crisis Group, Indonesia’s Maluku Crisis, p. 5.
17 Tomagola, ‘The Bleeding Halmahera of North Moluccas’, p. 9.
18 Ibid.; see note 27 for the percentage of Muslims as support for Bahar Andily’s greater
political support.
19 Nanere, Halmahera Berdarah, p. 62.
20 The history of this rivalry is discussed in the next chapter.
21 International Crisis Group, Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku, p. 6.
22 Alhadar, ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’.
23 This conflict is discussed in the next chapter.
24 International Crisis Group, Indonesia’s Maluku Crisis, p. 2. Another study of the
Maluku conflict that sees the North Maluku violence as an extension of the conflict in
Ambon is E. Al-Jakartaty, Tragedi Bumi Seribu Pulau (The Tragedy of the Land of a
Thousand Islands), Jakarta: Gubuk Kajian Mutiara Nasional, 2000, p. 13.
Notes 199
25 J. Bertrand, Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2004, pp. 129–31.
26 Ibid., p. 130.
27 Ibid., p. 131.
28 The process of pemekaran is discussed in the next chapter. Since 1999, over 100 new
districts have been created in Indonesia.
29 The literature includes C. Tilly, From Mobilization to Revolution, Reading, MA:
Addison Wesley, 1978; D. McAdam, Political Process and the Development of Black
Insurgency 1930–1970, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1982; M.
N. Zald and B. Useem, ‘Movement and Countermovement Interaction: Mobilization,
Tactics, and State Involvement’, in M. N. Zald and J. D. McCarthy (eds), Social Move-
ments in an Organizational Society, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1987; D.
S. Meyer and S. Staggenborg, ‘Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of
Political Opportunity’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 101, no. 6 (May 1996).
30 M. D. Toft, The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisi-
bility of Territory, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003, D.
Horowitz, Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985,
p. 143.
31 See for example: P. Collier and A. Hoeffler, ‘On Economic Causes of Civil War’,
Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 50, no. 4 (1998), 563–73; N. Sambanis, ‘A Review of
Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War’,
Defence and Peace Economics, vol. 13, no. 3 (2002), 215–43; J. D. Fearon and D. D.
Laitin, ‘Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War’, American Political Science Review,
vol. 97, no. 1 (February 2003).
32 For example Alhadar, ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’; Bubandt, ‘The Dynamics
of Reasonable Paranoia’, p. 2.
33 Alhadar, ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’.
34 Ibid.
35 Bubandt, ‘The Dynamics of Reasonable Paranoia’, p. 2.
36 Ibid, p. 24.
37 See S. J. Tambiah, Leveling Crowds: Ethnonationalist Conflicts and Collective
Violence in South Asia, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996, p. 81, and P.
R. Brass, Theft of an Idol: Text and Context in the Representation of Collective
Violence, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997, p. 208.
38 Tomagola, ‘The Bleeding Halmahera of North Moluccas’, p. 4.
39 Alhadar, ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’.
40 Ahmad and Oesman, Damai Yang Terkoyak, pp. 60–71.
41 International Crisis Group, Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku, p. 8.
42 Bubandt, ‘Towards a New Politics of Tradition?’.
43 Nanere, Halmahera Berdarah, p. 98.
44 Tomagola, ‘The Bleeding Halmahera of North Moluccas’, p. 9.
45 International Crisis Group, Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku, p. 7.
46 Alhadar, ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’.
47 Tomagola, ‘The Bleeding Halmahera of North Moluccas’, p. 4.
48 International Crisis Group, Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku, p. 9.
49 The free-rider concept is most commonly associated with Mancur Olson. See M.
Olson, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Goods,
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Chapter 1
1 Examples include: B. Arfi, ‘Ethnic Fear: The Social Construction of Insecurity’,
Security Studies, vol. 8, no. 1 (Autumn 1998), 151–203; S. Ellis, The Mask of
200 Notes
Anarchy: The Destruction of Liberia and the Religious Dimension of an African
Civil War, New York: New York University Press, 1999; V. P. Gagnon, ‘Ethnic
Nationalism and International Conflict: The Case of Serbia’, in M. E. Brown et al.
(eds), Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict (International Security Readers series),
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997; and J. Snyder, From Voting to Violence:
Democratization and Nationalist Conflict, New York: W. W. Norton & Company,
2000.
2 V. P. Gagnon, ‘Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict: The Case of Serbia’,
International Security, vol. 19, no. 3 (Winter 1994/95), p. 142.
3 Ibid., p. 134.
4 J. Mueller, ‘The Banality of Ethnic War’, International Security, vol. 25, no. 1
(Summer 2000), 42–70.
5 M. Kaldor, New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Globalized Era, Stanford:
Stanford University Press, 1999, p. 8.
6 S. Tarrow, Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Mass
Politics in the Modern State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 3.
7 J. D. McCarthy and N. Zald, ‘Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A
Partial Theory’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 82, no. 6, p. 1215.
8 Ibid., p. 1215.
9 D. McAdam, Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970,
Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1982, p. 21.
10 B. A. Valentino, Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the Twentieth
Century, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2004, p. 61.
11 Ibid., p. 38.
12 Ibid., p. 64.
13 D. Horowitz, Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Berkeley: University of California Press,
1985.
14 A. Varshney, Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India, New
Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2002.
15 See for example P. Collier and A. Hoeffler, ‘Greed and Grievance in Civil War’,
World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 2355, Washington, DC: World
Bank, October 2001; M. L. Ross, ‘Oil, Drugs and Diamonds: The Varying Roles of
Natural Resources in Civil Wars’, in K. Ballentine and J. Sherman (eds), The Political
Economy of Armed Conflict: Beyond Greed and Grievance, Boulder: Lynne Reiner
Publishers, 2003.
16 B. R. Posen, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, Survival, vol. 35, no. 1,
27–47.
17 Horowitz, Ethnic Groups in Conflict, and T. R. Gurr, Why Men Rebel, Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1970.
18 Posen, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, pp. 29–31.
19 Gurr, Why Men Rebel, p. 9.
20 Ibid., p. 50.
21 D. Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic Riot, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001,
pp. 225–6.
22 Horowitz, Ethnic Groups in Conflict, p. 143.
23 D. Horowitz, ‘Group Loyalty and Ethnic Violence’, in C. Hermann et al. (eds),
Violent Conflict in the Twenty-first Century: Causes, Instruments and Mitigation, Illi-
nois: American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 1999, p. 101.
24 Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic Riot, p. 225.
25 Ibid., pp. 226, 230.
26 Ibid., p. 13.
27 S. Kaufman, ‘An “International” Theory of Interethnic War’, Review of International
Studies, vol. 22, no. 2 (April 1996), p. 157.
28 Ibid., p. 158.
Notes 201
29 D. Keen, The Economic Functions of Violence in Civil Wars, Adelphi Paper 320,
London: Oxford University Press, 1998.
30 S. Olzak, The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict, Stanford: Stanford
University Press, 1992.
31 Ibid., pp. 28, 209.
32 Ibid., p. 212.
33 J. D. Fearon and D. D. Laitin, ‘Explaining Interethnic Cooperation’, American Polit-
ical Science Review, vol. 90, no. 4 (December 1996), p. 715.
34 J. D. Fearon, ‘Ethnic War as a Commitment Problem’, paper presented at the 1994
Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, August
30–September 2, 1995.
35 S. N. Kalyvas, ‘The Ontology of “Political Violence”: Action and Identity in Civil
Wars’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 1, no. 3 (September 2003), p. 483.
36 S. N. Kalyvas, The Logic of Violence in Civil Wars, New York: Cambridge University
Press, 2006, pp. 12–14.
37 Valentino, Final Solutions, p. 235.
38 Ibid., pp. 169–72.
39 C. Kaufman, ‘Rational Choice and Progress in the Study of Ethnic Conflict: A
Review Essay’, Security Studies, vol. 14, no. 1 (January–March 2005), p. 182.
40 R. D. Petersen, Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in
Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
41 Ibid., pp. 22–31.
42 O. Waever, B. Buzan, M. Kelstrup and P. Lemaitre, Identity, Migration and the New
Security Agenda in Europe, London: Pinter Publishers, 1993, p. 23.
43 S. Kaufman, ‘Symbolic Politics or Rational Choice? Testing Theories of Extreme
Ethnic Violence’, International Security, vol. 30, no. 4 (Spring 2006), pp. 52–3.
44 Collier and Hoeffler, ‘Greed and Grievance in Civil War’, p. 2.
45 Ibid., p. 17.
46 Ibid., p. 16.
47 Correspondingly, conflict study is often seen as divided into several different
approaches: Essentialism (or Primordialism); Instrumentalism; Institutionalism;
and Constructivism. A great deal of literature attempts to assess the progress of
these main approaches to explaining conflict. See for example C. Kaufman,
‘Rational Choice and Progress in the Study of Ethnic Conflict’. See also Kaufman,
‘Symbolic Politics or Rational Choice?’. On several problems with the use of this
typology, see C. King, ‘The Micropolitics of Social Violence’, World Politics, vol.
56, no. 3 (April 2004), pp. 435–7.
48 This is clearly not a new discovery – numerous analysts have recognized the need for
a more synthetic and consensual approach to the study of conflict as the discussion
below demonstrates. See for example: Arfi, ‘Ethnic Fear’; J. B. Rule, ‘Rationality and
Non-Rationality in Militant Collective Action’, Sociological Theory, vol. 7, no. 2
(Autumn 1989), p. 158; D. Horowitz, ‘Structure and Strategy in Ethnic Conflict’,
paper prepared for the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics,
Washington, DC, 20–21 April 1998; Kaufman, ‘An “International” Theory of
Interethnic War’, p. 157.
49 As stated above, Donald Horowitz claims riots and other forms of communal violence
contain both organization and spontaneity: see for example ‘Structure and Strategy in
Ethnic Conflict’, p. 25. See also P. R. Brass, The Production of Hindu–Muslim
Violence in Contemporary India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 32.
50 A. J. Regan, ‘The Bougainville Conflict: Political and Economic Agendas’, in
Ballentine and Sherman, The Political Economy of Armed Conflict.
51 Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic Riot, p. 13.
52 Snyder, From Voting to Violence, p. 305.
53 Ibid., p. 39.
202 Notes
54 Arfi, ‘Ethnic Fear’.
55 Ibid., p.156.
56 Ibid., p. 168.
57 Ibid.
58 D. A. Lake, ‘International Relations Theory and Internal Conflict: Insights from the
Interstices’, International Studies Review, vol. 5, no. 4 (December 2003), p. 86.
Surveying several detailed case studies of violence, James Fearon and David Laitin
provide a good overview of some possible answers to this dilemma. Possible explana-
tions include: a psychological bias towards believing the leaders of one’s group;
information imbalances between leaders and masses; a long-standing discourse of
ethnic animosity; and the possibility that participants are actually taking advantage of
ethnic provocation to pursue their own agendas: J. D. Fearon and D. D. Laitin, ‘Vio-
lence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity’, International Organization,
vol. 54, no. 4 (Autumn 2000), pp. 845–55.
59 Many internal conflicts are also complicated by the intervention of external parties, at
national or international levels. While the actions (or lack thereof) on the part of
Jakarta had some influence on the trajectory of the violence, the North Maluku
conflict remained almost entirely local in scope so this consideration does not apply
here.
60 R. Brubaker and D. Laitin, ‘Ethnic and Nationalist Violence’, Annual Review of Soci-
ology, vol. 24 (1998), p. 446.
61 S. J. Tambiah, Leveling Crowds: Ethnonationalist Conflicts and Collective Violence
in South Asia, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996, p. 214.
62 For example, the Ambon conflict in eastern Indonesia quickly evolved from clashes
between local Christians and Muslim migrants from South Sulawesi into religious
violence. See International Crisis Group, Indonesia’s Maluku Crisis: The Issues,
Indonesia Briefing, 19 July 2000, and Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku,
Asia Report no. 10, 19 December 2000.
63 See for example A. A. Engineer, ‘Introduction’, in A. A. Engineer (ed.), The Gujarat
Carnage, New Delhi: Orient Longman, 2003; P. R. Brass, Theft of an Idol: Text and
Context in the Representation of Collective Violence, Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 1997; Tambiah, Leveling Crowds.
64 Kalyvas, ‘The Ontology of “Political Violence”’, pp. 475–6. Of rioting during the
Tragic Week in Barcelona in 1909, the governor is reported to have said: ‘On each
street they shouted different things and fought for different purposes’, H. Thomas,
The Spanish Civil War, rev. edn, New York: The Modern Library, 2001, p. 18.
65 Kalyvas, ‘The Ontology of “Political Violence”’, p. 479.
66 K. R. Young, ‘Local and National Influences in the Violence of 1965’, in R. Cribb
(ed.), The Indonesian Killings 1965–1966: Studies from Java and Bali, Victoria,
Australia: Aristoc Press, 1990.
67 Kalyvas, ‘The Ontology of “Political Violence”’, p. 481.
68 Individuals interviewed included members of the Ternate, Tidore, Makian, Tobelo,
Galela and Kao ethnic communities.
69 H. Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Berkeley: Prentice
Hall, 1969.
70 Ibid., p. 2.
Chapter 2
1 Kabupaten Maluku Utara and Kabupaten Halmahera Tengah. In April 1999 Ternate
City was made a municipality (kotamadya), giving it the same status as a district with
its own parliament. I use the full term North Maluku District when referring to the
district. I use the term North Maluku when referring to the entire region.
Notes 203
2 Interview with Yusuf Abdurrahman, former rector of Khairun University, in Ternate,
12 January 2004. In reality, after several centuries of movement between islands, the
differences between ethnic communities are perhaps not clearly demarcated,
although most people strongly identify with their ethnic community and differentiate
themselves from other communities. Linguistically, the region is divided between
Papuan language speakers, located mostly in northern Halmahera, Ternate and
Tidore, and Austronesian speakers, located mostly on Makian, Bacan and in southern
Halmahera: L. Y. Andaya, The World of Maluku: Eastern Indonesia in the Early
Modern Period, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1993, p. 104.
3 Although many Makians believe their community constitutes perhaps 50 per cent of
North Maluku’s population.
4 Under transmigrasi the central government resettled families from overcrowded
areas of the country, such as Java and Bali, to less crowded areas in eastern Indonesia
and elsewhere.
5 Official statistics for religious affiliation state that Muslims constitute 80 per cent of
the North Maluku population. However, many Christians, including the Protestant
Evangelical Church on Halmahera (GMIH), dispute this, suggesting that the true
figure is more likely to be approximately 65 per cent, with Christians comprising the
remaining 35 per cent of the population.
6 C. G. Kiem, Growing up in Indonesia: Youth and Social Change in a Moluccan Town,
Saarbrücken and Fort Lauderdale: Verlag Breitenbach Publishers, 1993, p. 139.
7 More complete accounts of North Maluku’s history can be found in: Andaya, The
World of Maluku; J. Haire, The Character and Theological Struggle of the Church in
Halmahera, 1941–1979, Frankfurt: Verlag Peter D. Lang, 1981; W. A. Hanna and D.
Alwi, Turbulent Times Past in Ternate and Tidore, Banda Naira: Yayasan Warisan
dan Budaya Banda Naira, 1990.
8 Andaya, The World of Maluku, p. 1. Archaeological records from the Middle East
suggest that the clove, native only to Maluku, had been traded along long-distance
networks since at least 1700 BC.
9 From the early sixteenth century, Ternate came to exercise power over Jailolo, which
faced it across the strait on Halmahera. Likewise, Tidore eventually incorporated
Bacan into its own kingdom: Haire, The Character and Theological Struggle, p. 9.
10 Ambon recognized the authority of Ternate until the Dutch colonial administration
assumed control of the island in the late seventeenth century: Andaya, The World of
Maluku, p. 84.
11 Ibid., p. 97. This relationship can still be observed in present-day linguistic termi-
nology. Tobelo and other communities (both Muslim and Christian) use the terms ke
atas (above) to signify any direction toward Ternate and ke bawah (below) for any
direction away from Ternate. These terms are used rather than north and south and
can make for a confusing bus ride from Tobelo southward towards Ternate (ke atas).
12 For example, Galela was required to send the sultan 20 men for service each year
along with large amounts of rice: Hanna and Alwi, Turbulent Times Past, p. 259.
13 Andaya, The World of Maluku, p. 96.
14 Ibid.
15 Ibid., p. 55. Intermarriage between the two kingdoms was common, and in 1999 the
two sultans were (albeit distant) relations.
16 Haire, The Character and Theological Struggle, p. 92.
17 R. Z. Leirissa, ‘The Idea of a Fourth Kingdom in Nineteenth Century Tidorese
Maluku’, in E. K. M. Masinambow (ed.), Maluku dan Irian Jaya (special issue of
Buletin Leknas, vol. III, no. 1), Jakarta: Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, 1994,
p. 181.
18 Andaya, The World of Maluku, p. 157, and Hanna and Alwi, Turbulent Times Past, p.
135.
19 Ibid., p. 252.
204 Notes
20 Andaya, The World of Maluku, p. 57.
21 Haire, The Character and Theological Struggle, p. 91.
22 J. Villiers, ‘Las Yslas de Esperar en Dios: The Jesuit Mission in Moro 1546–1571’,
Modern Asian Studies, vol. 22, no. 3 (1988), p. 595. Christian conversion was appar-
ently spurred by a series of volcanoes and earthquakes. In 1533, 35,000 people were
baptized in 29 villages around ‘Moro’. Remains of the Portuguese settlement can be
seen in the forest on a mountainside behind the village of Mamuya.
23 Hanna and Alwi, Turbulent Times Past, pp. 57–8, 75.
24 Andaya, The World of Maluku, p. 146.
25 The Portuguese were particularly hostile towards Muslims, a result of the centu-
ries-long occupation of Portugal by Moors from North Africa: ibid., p. 123.
26 Ibid., p. 131.
27 Ibid., p. 132.
28 Haire, The Character and Theological Struggle, p. 107.
29 N. Ishige, ‘Limau Village and its Setting’, in N. Ishige (ed.), The Galela of
Halmahera: A Preliminary Survey, Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 1980, p.
8.
30 Haire, The Character and Theological Struggle, p. 144.
31 Ibid., p. 67.
32 Ibid., p. 182. The Ambonese, who constituted the majority of the pastors in the region
at that time, also practised a form of Christianity syncretized with local Ambonese
adat.
33 After spice production and the accompanying colonial administration had been relo-
cated to Ambon, Christians on that island were provided with superior education and
employment opportunities in the bureaucracy and Dutch military compared to
Muslims: R. Chauvel, Nationalists, Soldiers and Separatists: The Ambonese Islands
from Colonialism to Revolt 1880–1950, Leiden: KITLV Press, 1990, pp. 20, 27.
34 Interview with Galela Muslim leader Haji Umar T Baendi, former village head of
Igobula, Galela, in Igobula, 30 October 2003. The Japanese occupied Halmahera
from 1942 to 1945. Japanese forces occupied most areas of the region, including
Ternate, but were stationed in greatest concentration in Kao, where 50,000 troops
were based and built an airport. After the deployment of large numbers of American
troops led by General MacArthur on the large northernmost island of Morotai in the
latter part of World War II, North Maluku, particularly north Halmahera, became the
scene of intense conflict. The wrecks of several Japanese warships lie off the coast of
Kao: J. Leith, ‘Resettlement History, Resources and Resistance in North Halmahera’,
in S. Pannell and F. von Benda-Beckmann (eds), Old World Places, New World Prob-
lems: Exploring Issues of Resource Management in Eastern Indonesia, Canberra:
Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University,
1998, p. 113.
35 Interview with local historian Adnan Amal in Ternate, 15 January 2004. In 1958,
several military officers in North Sulawesi launched the Permesta rebellion.
Supporters of the rebellion in North Maluku fought against government military units
on Halmahera and Ternate: Hanna and Alwi, Turbulent Times Past, p. 271. Interview
with Ternate historian Herry Nachrawy in Ternate, 14 January 2004.
36 Interview with Ternate historian Herry Nachrawy in Ternate, 14 January 2004.
37 R. Chauvel, ‘Ambon: Not a Revolution but a Counterrevolution’, in A. R. Kahin (ed.),
Regional Dynamics of the Indonesian Revolution: Unity from Diversity, Honolulu:
University of Hawaii Press, 1985, p. 257. On the RMS rebellion, see also Chauvel,
Nationalists, Soldiers and Separatists.
38 Chauvel, ‘Ambon: Not a Revolution but a Counterrevolution’, p. 259.
39 Ibid. While the largely Christian RMS separatist movement was defeated, the Chris-
tian community in Ambon continued to enjoy dominance in gubernatorial and civil
service positions until the 1990s.
Notes 205
40 See for example Kiem, Growing up in Indonesia, p. 54.
41 Interview with Herry Nachrawy, in Ternate, 14 January 2004.
42 Many Muslims in North Maluku refer to the movement as Republik Maluku Sarani –
the local term for Christian.
43 Haire, The Character and Theological Struggle, p. 54.
44 Many of the Christian Ambonese suspected of being involved in RMS were pastors or
others associated with GMIH.
45 For a discussion of Darul Islam, see C. van Dijk, Rebellion under the Banner of Islam,
The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1981.
46 Interview with Christian community leader Urubungus Djawa in Tobelo Sub-District,
24 January 2004.
47 Interview with Urubungus Djawa and several other Christians in Tobelo Sub-District,
2003–4.
48 Kiem, Growing up in Indonesia, p. 55.
49 Ibid.
50 Ibid.
51 P. A. Meyer and M. Hardjodimedjo, ‘Maluku: The Modernization of the Spice
Islands’, in H. Hill (ed.), Unity and Diversity: Regional Economic Development in
Indonesia since 1970, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, p. 558.
52 It is estimated that almost three-quarters of Maluku Province (before the separation of
the North Maluku region) was forested and two-thirds of the logs extracted in Maluku
came from the north: ibid., pp. 550, 564.
53 Ibid., p. 557.
54 Newcrest Mining Ltd website: www.newcrest.com.au PT Nusa Halmahera Mineral is
82.5 per cent owned by Newcrest and 17.5 per cent owned by Aneka Tambang.
55 A good discussion of the migration of young people to Ternate from rural areas on
other islands to attend school can be found in Kiem, Growing up in Indonesia, pp.
73–7.
56 Makians officially make up 9 per cent of the North Maluku District population.
Statistic from ‘Maluku Utara Dalam Angka, 1999’ (North Maluku in Figures, 1999),
Badan Pusat Statistik (Central Bureau of Statistics), Ternate. Their proportion in
Central Halmahera District is greater, however. There are also, according to several
sources, many others in North Maluku who have one Makian parent but do not iden-
tify themselves as Makians in censuses. There has traditionally been much intermar-
riage between Makians and several other ethnic groups such as Tidores, Sananas and
Kayoas.
57 Interview with Christian community leader Urubungus Djawa in Tobelo Sub-District,
24 January 2004.
58 The perception of this dominance held by other ethnic groups, especially those from
Halmahera, is probably even greater than the reality. Makians represent most political
parties including Golkar, PDI-P (Democratic Party of Indonesia: Partai Demokrasi
Indonesia – Perjuangan) and PPP (the United Development Party: Partai Persatuan
Pembangunan).
59 Thaib Armain was also the head of the bureaucracy for North Maluku District from
1989 to 1997. In 2002 he was elected governor of North Maluku Province.
60 Interview with Yusuf Abdurrahman, Khairun University campus, Ternate, 12
January 2004.
61 For example, in 1998, following a dispute with the district head, Abdullah Assagaf,
the sultan’s traditional guards (Pasukan Adat), also sometimes known as the Young
Generation of Sultan Baabullah (Gemusba), attacked Abdullah Assagaf’s office. The
guards destroyed a great deal of equipment in the office, including computers and
furniture.
62 This was despite societal and familial pressures against converting, as required by
Indonesian law when the partners are of different religions.
206 Notes
63 Kiem, Growing up in Indonesia, pp. 107, 111–12.
64 Ibid., p. 116. To some extent these divisions in Ternate society were also associated
with political divisions between Golkar (of which the sultan was a representative) and
the party with a strong Islamic character, PPP.
65 Badan Pusat Statistik, Bappenas and UNDP, Indonesia Human Development Report
2001. Towards a New Consensus: Democracy and Human Development in Indonesia,
Jakarta, 2001, p. 2, and H. Hill, ‘Indonesia: The Strange and Sudden Death of a Tiger
Economy’, Oxford Development Studies, vol. 28, no. 2 (2000), p. 118.
66 Badan Pusat Statistik, Bappenas and UNDP, Indonesia Human Development Report
2001, pp. 2–8.
67 The World Bank estimated that from 1990 to 1996 highly mobile short-term debt
trebled. Cited in Hill, ‘Indonesia: The Strange and Sudden Death of a Tiger Econ-
omy’, p. 124.
68 Badan Pusat Statistik, Bappenas and UNDP, Indonesia Human Development Report
2001, p. 1.
69 For the sake of uniformity this study uses the more recent term TNI for the military
and Polri (Polisi Indonesia) for the national police.
70 In the 1950s newly independent Indonesia had a brief period of democracy.
71 Some of the more resource-rich provinces such as Aceh and Papua accused Jakarta (or
more generally Java) of having exploited local resources with scant compensation.
72 The impact of this policy is discussed further in the next chapter.
73 H. Crouch, ‘Wiranto and Habibie: Military–Civilian Relations since May 1998’, in A.
Budiman et al. (eds), Reformasi: Crisis and Change in Indonesia, Melbourne:
Monash Asia Institute, 1999, pp. 140–1. In 1997 this number was reduced to 75.
74 Ibid., p. 145.
75 J. Kristiadi, ‘The Armed Forces’, in R. W. Baker et al. (eds), Indonesia: The Chal-
lenge of Change, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1999, p. 101.
76 The monthly salary of ordinary soldiers is between Rp550,000 and Rp900,000
(US$55–90) and for high-ranking officers it is between Rp2 million and Rp6 million
(US$200–600): ‘Cash Strapped Military Recipe for Corruption’, Asia Times, 15
March 2003.
77 Editorial, ‘Current Data on the Indonesian Military Elite: January 1 1999–January 31
2001’, Indonesia, vol. 71 (April 2001), p. 1. The editors estimate that, in 1999, the
military had control of over 300 companies through foundations and cooperatives
(ibid., footnote 3).
78 D. Bourchier, ‘Skeletons, Vigilantes, and the Armed Forces’ Fall from Grace’, p. 152.
79 H. Crouch, ‘Political Update: Megawati’s Holding Operation’, in E Aspinall and G.
Fealy (eds), Local Power and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralization and Democrati-
zation. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2003. See also G. Robinson,
‘Indonesia: On a New Course?’, in M. Alagappa (ed.), Coercion and Governance:
The Declining Political Role of the Military in Asia, Stanford: Stanford University
Press, 2001, p. 242.
80 This lack of resources was felt most strongly in the regions, because the government’s
funding allocation to the security forces almost certainly remains in Jakarta. There-
fore while the security forces as a whole are forced to obtain 70 per cent of their
required income from ‘off-balance-sheet’ activities, in the more remote regions the
percentage is closer to 100 per cent.
81 Asian Development Bank, ‘Country Governance Assessment Report Republic Indo-
nesia’, draft report, September 2002.
82 See for example the anti-Madurese riots by Malays in West Kalimantan in 1999: J. S.
Davidson, ‘The Politics of Violence on an Indonesian Periphery’, South East Asia
Research, vol. 11, no. 1, 59–89.
83 B. Singh, ‘The Indonesian Military Business Complex: Origins, Course and Future’,
Working Paper no. 354, Canberra: Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, 2001, p. 10.
Notes 207
84 Polls taken in Jakarta, Medan and elsewhere found that 46 per cent of the population
believed that the TNI did not work in the interests of the nation: Bourchier, ‘Skele-
tons, Vigilantes, and the Armed Forces’ Fall from Grace’, p. 155.
85 International Crisis Group, National Police Reform, Asia Report no. 13, February
2001.
86 Eighty-seven per cent of Indonesians consider themselves Muslim.
87 M. Mietzner, ‘Godly Men in Green’, Inside Indonesia, 53, January–March 1998.
88 See A. Azra, ‘The Islamic Factor in Post-Soeharto Indonesia’, in C. Manning and P.
Van Dierman (eds), Indonesia in Transition: Social Aspects of Reformasi and Crisis’,
Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2000, p. 313.
89 J. Bertrand, Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2004, p. 80.
90 On the connection between more contemporary radical groups and Darul Islam, see
M. van Bruinessen, ‘Genealogies of Islamic Radicalism in Post-Suharto Indonesia’,
South East Asian Research, vol. 10, no. 2, (2002), and on the origins of the Darul
Islam movement, see J. C. Santosa, ‘Modernization, Utopia and the Rise of Islamic
Radicalism in Indonesia’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Boston University, 1996, p.
248.
91 Pancasila was first articulated by Sukarno in 1945 and has since been enshrined as the
national ideology. The five principles of pancasila are: belief in one God, humanitari-
anism, national unity, democracy and justice.
92 Santosa, ‘Modernization, Utopia and the Rise of Islamic Radicalism in Indonesia’, p.
326.
93 These incidents were attributed to a radical Islamic group under the leadership of
Husein Ali al Habsyi, a teacher at an Islamic religious school (pesantren) in Malang.
94 Bertrand, Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia, p. 99.
95 K. Steenbrink, ‘Muslim–Christian Relations in the Pancasila State of Indonesia’,
Muslim World, vol. 88, no. 3 (1998), 32–52, and Bertrand, Nationalism and Ethnic
Conflict in Indonesia, pp. 100–2.
96 ‘Kami tidak akan mundur’: interview in Tobelo, North Maluku in 2003.
97 On the violence in Poso, see L. V. Aragon, ‘Communal Violence in Poso, Central
Sulawesi: Where People Eat Fish and Fish Eat People’, Indonesia, vol. 72 (October
2001), 45–79; G. J. Aditjondro, ‘Kerusuhan Poso dan Morowali, Akar Permasalahan
dan Jalan Keluarnya’ (The Poso and Morowali Riots, the Roots of the Problem and
the Way Out), paper presented at seminar on Application of Emergency Status in
Aceh, Papua and Poso?, Hotel Santika, Jakarta, 7 January 2004; and D. McRae,
‘Criminal Justice and Communal Conflict: A Case Study of the Trial of Fabianus
Tibo, Dominggus Da Silva, and Marinus Riwu’, Indonesia, vol. 83 (April 2007),
79–117.
98 There were violent incidents in at least seven locations throughout Indonesia on the
same day, including Cirebon, Tegal, Pemalang, Sugihwaras, West Kalimantan and
Bolang Mongondow district in North Sulawesi, according to ‘Mass Violence Mars
Indonesia’s Eid al-Fitr Celebrations’, Agence France Presse, 21 January 1999. The
nature of the incidents, i.e. anger over recent elections, retribution on a suspected
thief, violence against police because of brutality, would suggest that the religious
character of the date was not determinative.
99 ‘Panic in Ambon – National Human Rights Group Ambushed’, Kompas, 3 February
1999.
100 ‘Death Toll in Indonesian Religious Riot Reaches 24: Official’, Agence France
Presse, 21 January 1999, ‘Warning Shot Marks Tension in Riot Hit Indonesian
Town’, Agence France Presse, 23 January 1999.
101 See the Ambon Information Website, where figures obtained from the Regional Office
of the Ministry of Transmigration are displayed: www.websitesrcg.com/ambon/
Transmig.htm. Accessed May 2002.
208 Notes
102 ‘Unrest in Ambon on Lebaran Day’, Kompas, 21 January 1999.
103 Ambonese reportedly resented the influx of Bugis because of a belief they created
slums and caused rising crime: Human Rights Watch, ‘Indonesia: The Violence in
Ambon’, Human Rights Watch Report, 1999. Prior to the violence, both Christian and
Muslim Ambonese and Bugis had also complained of the violence of the migrant
Butonese population: D. Mearns, ‘Class, Status and Habitus in Ambon’, in D. Mearns
and C. Healey (eds), Remaking Maluku: Social Transformation in Eastern Indonesia,
Special Monograph no. 1, Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Territory
University, 1996, p. 102.
104 See report by Richard Rowat, the MSF Field Coordinator in Ambon, online at:
www.websitesrcg.com/ambon/documents/Advocat1.htm.
105 J. Bertrand, ‘Legacies of the Authoritarian Past: Religious Violence in Indonesia’s
Moluccan Islands’, Pacific Affairs, vol. 75, no. 1 (2002), p. 73.
106 See J. D. Goss and T. R. Leinbach, ‘Development and Differentiation: A Case Study
of a Transmigration Settlement in West Seram’, in Mearns and Healey, Remaking
Maluku, p. 92, and F. von Benda-Beckmann and T. Taale, ‘Land, Trees, and Houses:
Changing (Un)Certainties in Property Relationships on Ambon’, in Mearns and
Healey, Remaking Maluku, p. 52.
107 International Crisis Group, The Search for Peace in Maluku, p. 2. Human Rights
Watch, ‘Indonesia: The Violence in Ambon’.
108 C. J. Bohm, ‘Brief Chronicle of the Unrest in the Moluccas 1999–2001’, Crisis
Centre, Diocese of Amboina, p. 4.
109 International Crisis Group, Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku, p. 3.
110 Bertrand, ‘Legacies of the Authoritarian Past’. The RMS rebellion of the 1950s was
also preceded by Christian concerns at being incorporated into a predominately
Muslim state: Chauvel, ‘Ambon: Not a Revolution but a Counterrevolution’, p. 260.
111 G. van Klinken, ‘The Maluku Wars: Bringing Society Back In’, Indonesia, 71 (April
2001), p. 11.
112 G. J. Aditjondro, ‘Guns, Pamphlets and Handy-Talkies: How the Military Exploited
Local Ethno-religious Tensions in Maluku to Preserve their Political and Economic
Privileges’, in I. Wessel and G. Wimhofer (eds), Violence in Indonesia, Hamburg:
Abera Verlag Markus Voss, 2001.
113 Between 165 and 600 Ambonese sailed to Ambon from Java at the end of 1998, either
expelled for having inadequate identification papers (KTP) or voluntarily for the reli-
gious holidays of Christmas and Ramadan. These groups included the leaders and
members of Ambonese gangs in Jakarta
114 International Crisis Group, Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku, p. 5.
115 The distance between Ternate and the Maluku provincial capital of Ambon was
approximately 500 km, which is approximately the same as the distance between
Jakarta and Surabaya: Meyer and Hardjodimedjo, ‘Maluku: The Modernization of the
Spice Islands’, p. 549.
116 Interview with North Maluku historian Herry Nachrawy in Ternate, 14 January 2004.
117 Ibid. As in 1999, during the Sukarno and Suharto eras, the creation of a new province
required the agreement of the government of the province from which the new prov-
ince would be created.
118 The violence in Ambon cannot be considered a factor in the mobilization to create the
province, as efforts to do so preceded the start of that conflict.
119 Many North Malukans also perceived that the new president, B. J. Habibie, would be
more sympathetic to the region, coming as he did from Gorontalo in Sulawesi: F.
Ammari and J. W. Siokona (eds) Ternate: Kelahiran dan Sejarah sebuah Kota
(Ternate: The Birth and History of a City), Ternate: Ternate City Government, 2003,
p. 135.
120 Interview with Hasbi Yusuf, currently a lecturer at Khairun University and in 1998 a
member of the FPPMU, in Ternate, 5 January 2004.
Notes 209
121 Bahar and Syamsir Andili are originally from Tidore, although of Gorontalo heritage.
122 Numerous interviews in Ternate and elsewhere in North Maluku, 2003–4.
123 President Sukarno granted Yogyakarta Daerah Istimewa status because of the city’s
involvement in the independence struggle against the Dutch.
124 Several interviews in North Maluku.
Chapter 3
1 Sidney Tarrow defines a social movement as ‘collective challenges by people with
common purposes and solidarity in sustained interaction with elites, opponents, and
authorities’, S. Tarrow, Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action,
and Mass Politics in the Modern State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1994, p. 3.
2 J. D. McCarthy and N. Zald, ‘Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A
Partial Theory’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 82, no. 6, p. 1216.
3 Perhaps because the focus of most Social Movement theorists has been rebellion and
insurgency, most theorists have focused overwhelmingly on the responses of
different factions of the state’s elite to social movements.
4 On counter-mobilization, see M. N. Zald and B. Useem, ‘Movement and
Countermovement Interaction’, in M. N. Zald and J. D. McCarthy (eds), Social Move-
ments in an Organizational Society, Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1987, and D.
S. Meyer and S. Staggenborg, ‘Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of
Political Opportunity’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 101, no. 6 (May 1996), p.
1635.
5 See for example D. McAdam, Political Process and the Development of Black Insur-
gency 1930–1970, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1982, p. 56,
and Zald and Useem, ‘Movement and Countermovement Interaction’, p. 248.
6 Meyer and Staggenborg ‘Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Polit-
ical Opportunity’, p. 1650.
7 D. McAdam, ‘Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency’, American Sociolog-
ical Review, vol. 48 (December 1983), p. 735.
8 Recent scholarship in the Resource Mobilization tradition has also emphasized the
importance of emotion to social movements. See R. R. Aminzade and D. McAdam,
‘Emotions and Contentious Politics’, in R. R Aminzade et al. (eds), Silence and Voice
in the Study of Contentious Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001,
p. 15.
9 D. Horowitz, Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Berkeley: University of California Press,
1985, p. 143.
10 Ibid., pp. 147–75.
11 For example, Anthony Smith defines an ethnie as a ‘named human population with a
shared ancestry, myths, histories and cultures, having an association with a specific
territory, and a sense of solidarity’: A. D. Smith, The Ethnic Origins of Nations,
Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1986, p. 32.
12 M. D. Toft, The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisi-
bility of Territory, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003, pp. 1–6.
13 There are obviously many other factors relevant to these conflicts, but ties to territory
are central to both.
14 Kao is now located within North Halmahera District. Until October 1999, the area of
North Maluku was not yet a province but comprised two districts (North Maluku and
Central Halmahera) and one city (Ternate). The area that is now the district of North
Halmahera was, at that time, several sub-districts within North Maluku District.
15 Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Maluku Utara, Ternate (Central Bureau for Statis-
tics for North Maluku District), ‘Maluku Utara Dalam Angka, 1999’.
210 Notes
16 There are no official statistics for the number of Muslims in Kao. Abdurrahman
Hongi, a Kao Muslim community leader, stated that over a thousand Muslims live in
Kao (interview in Kao, February 2004).
17 These settlements are largely in West Kao but are also situated at Waringinlamo, 15
km from the capital, and near Pediwang in the north-east of the sub-district. The
inhabitants of these settlements are generally Muslim Javanese. However, the compo-
sition of many of these villages has changed substantially following the conflict, as
almost all Muslim Javanese returned to Java, and their houses and land were often
bought (cheaply) by Christian IDPs from elsewhere on Halmahera (see Chapter 7).
18 For a discussion of this resettlement, see R. Lucardie, ‘Spontaneous and Planned
Movement among the Makianese of Eastern Indonesia,’ Pacific Viewpoint, vol. 26,
no. 1 (April 1985), 63–78.
19 Many Makians state that the government forced them to depart from their villages.
20 Interviews in North Maluku, 2003–4.
21 Makians living in Malifut and Kaos testify to the welcoming attitude of the Kaos in
1975 and the existence of close relations between the two communities. For example,
Fahri Yamin, a Makian staff member for the Malifut office of PDI-P, interviewed in
Malifut, 3 November 2003, and Nathanial Bitjara, a Kao community leader inter-
viewed in Kao, 29 December 2003.
22 In 1999, approximately 75 per cent of the Malifut population was successfully
engaged in farming clove, cocoa and coconut (for copra), most of which was sold to
Kao villages and Tobelo for export (interview with the Malifut Sub-District Head and
head of agriculture, Malifut, 20 January 2004). The Makians are widely considered
by most ethnic groups in North Maluku to be highly successful farmers.
23 Interview with Ahdan Abdul Gani, Kepala Desa Samsuma village, Malifut, 2
February 2003.
24 Interview with Suratman in Ternate, 13 January 2004. Suratman was involved in the
push for legalized status for Malifut. North Maluku District Head Instruction
(Instruksi Bupati KDH Tk. II Maluku Utara) no. 09/8/MU/1995 closed the island to
reoccupation. See H. H. Sitohang et al., Menuju Rekonsiliasi Di Halmahera (Towards
Reconciliation on Halmahera), Jakarta: Pusat Pemberdayaan untuk Rekonsiliasi dan
Perdamaian, 2003, p. 76.
25 Lucardie, ‘Spontaneous and Planned Movement’, p. 76.
26 Members of the Kao and Tobelo communities regularly expressed this stereotype to
me. They often related a story in which the Makians were described as an elephant
which first asks if it may rest its trunk inside a house, then his head and finally his
whole body until there is no room left for the original inhabitants.
27 Interviews with large numbers of Kaos. It is difficult to obtain statistics indicating
inequality in funding, although the perception is widespread and deeply held among
Kao.
28 Several Makians, including members of the Makian elite in Ternate, expressed this
stereotype to me.
29 Interview with Pastor Rein Salakparang.
30 I heard this from several sources, including Mohtar Adam, a Makian on the academic
staff at Khairun University, interviewed in Ternate, 17 February 2004.
31 Confidential interview in North Maluku, 2003. By 1999 Kao ethnic solidarity became
far stronger in the face of ethnic antagonism with the Makian.
32 Newcrest Mining Ltd website: www.newcrest.com.au. PT Nusa Halmahera Mineral
is 82.5 per cent owned by Newcrest and 17.5 per cent owned by Aneka Tambang.
33 Interview with an Australian employee of Newcrest in Gosowong, 2003.
34 Interview with several Australian employees of Newcrest, Gosowong mine, 2003.
35 Muksin H. Abdullah, ‘Kerusuhan Maluku Utara Dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya’
(The North Maluku Riots in a Socio-cultural Perspective), in I. Hasan (ed.),
Memikirkan Kembali: Maluku dan Maluku Utara (Rethinking: Maluku and North
Notes 211
Maluku), Makassar: Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Hasanuddin (LEPHAS), 2003,
p. 132.
36 Interviews with several Makians, including Suratman, 13 January 2004.
37 Interview with Suratman, 13 January 2004.
38 Interview with several former students involved in lobbying the provincial and
central governments.
39 The names of these informants are confidential because of the sensitivity of the infor-
mation. Most members of the Makayoa group, or individuals associated with it, now
hold positions in the local bureaucracy or universities. Yusuf Abdurrahman told me it
was ‘stupid’ that the Kaos in villages such as Sosol wanted to remain part of Kao
Sub-District – the location of infrastructure clearly dictated that they should be within
Malifut. Interview on Khairun campus, Ternate, 12 January 2004.
40 Interview with Lt Col. (Ret.) Abdullah Assagaf, Bandung, 28 February 2004.
41 Ibid.
42 Interviews in North Maluku 2003–4. Several respondents also stated that some
Makian elite held the goal of making Malifut the provincial capital. In the early 1980s
there were plans among the North Maluku elite to create an independent North
Maluku Province. At that time there was discussion of making Malifut the capital of
the new province. The vice-president, Adam Malik, visited Malifut in 1982.
According to one respondent, this visit was widely seen as intended to assess the area
as a potential provincial capital. Interview with Tobelo community leader,
Urubungus Djawa, in Tomahalu village, 24 January 2004.
43 Interview with Abdullah Assagaf, district head of North Maluku July 1994–July
1999, in Bandung, 28 February 2004. The eventual North Halmahera District now
covers only the eastern side of the peninsula.
44 Interviews in North Maluku, 2003–4, including members of the North Maluku
District parliament. Even if the structure of two districts and one municipality had
remained after the new province had been established, it was likely that North Maluku
District would require a new capital. If, as seemed likely in early 1999, Ternate was to
become the provincial capital, it was likely that it would be considered unwieldy for
that city to fulfil a role as the capital of both the province and a district.
45 Interview with Hein Namotemo, in Tobelo, 2 December 2003.
46 In May 1999, one month prior to the start of production at Gosowong, Law 22/1999
and Law 25/1999 were signed by President Habibie and thereby passed into law.
Thanks to Professor Harold Crouch for information regarding the timing of these
laws. The decentralization process began in January 2001.
47 This proportion is specified in one of the implementing regulations following that
law. According to Regulation (PP) 104/2001, Section 10, this royalty is divided into
Land Rent (Iuran Tetap) and (the much smaller) Exploration and Exploitation Rent
(Iuran Eksplorasi dan Eksploitasi), 80 per cent of each going to the region. Of the 80
per cent of Land Rent, 16 per cent is paid to the province and 64 per cent to the
producing district or municipality (Kabupaten/Kota Penghasil). Of the 80 per cent of
Exploitation Rent, 16 per cent is paid to the province, 32 per cent to the producing
districts and 32 per cent to the remaining districts in the province.
48 Information obtained from the provincial mining department in Ternate in the form of
statements of royalty payments by Nusa Halmahera Mineral to the Department of
Finance in Jakarta. I was unable to obtain figures for 1999 or 2000, but I assume the
mine at that early stage of exploitation, despite the conflict, was producing at a rate
closer to the 2001 rate. Land Rent is obviously far smaller than Exploitation Rent. In
the first quarter of 2002, Nusa Halmahera Mineral paid US$5,354.47 in Land Rent as
opposed to US$465,407 in Exploitation Rent.
49 As was the case with North Maluku District, a large proportion of the staff of both the
bureaucracy and government were likely to be Makian.
50 Law 25/1999 provided no guidelines as to what portion of mining revenue must be
212 Notes
passed down to the sub-district government, leaving a ‘producing’ sub-district
dependent on the goodwill of the district government.
51 In 2004, ex-district head Abdullah Assagaf stated to me there was a consensus in the
district parliament in the early part of 1999 to form the sub-district. Interview in
Bandung, 28 February 2004.
52 The full name of this law is Peraturan Pemerintah No. 42/1999 tentang Pembentukan
dan Penataan Beberapa Kecamatan di Wilayah Kabupaten Daerah Tingkat II
Maluku Utara (Government Law No. 42/1999 on the Formation and Organization of
Several Sub-Districts in North Maluku District).
53 The use of student groups to lobby the central government may have been intended to
have this effect.
54 It is possible that the wider Kao community influenced the communities of those
villages set to be included in Malifut, making them subsequently reject the
sub-district.
55 Interview with Suratman, a member of the Makayoa student group, in Ternate, 13
January 2004.
56 Interview in Gosowong, October 2003.
57 For example, Arnol Nanlohy, a Kao Christian, interviewed 10 January 2003, and Mr
Moumou, a Kao Christian and village head of Sosol in 1999, both argued that the loss
of the mine was not a primary source of opposition to PP42.
58 Interviews with numerous Kao.
59 Sitohang et al., Menuju Rekonsiliasi Di Halmahera, pp. 78–9.
60 Ibid.
61 Interviews with Kao community leaders in Kao, 2003–4.
62 Interview with a member of the Makayoa student group.
63 Several Jailolo villages were also included in the new sub-district.
64 I was told of the symbolism of the grave by, among others, Haji Ahmad and
Abdurrahman Hongi, two Kao Muslim community leaders, in an interview in Kao, 19
January 2004, and by Imam Langar, a Kao Muslim religious leader, in Kao, 1 October
2003. A Christian Kao community leader stated to me the principle of ‘hidup bersama
mati sekubur’ (Ternate, confidential source).
65 Interviews in Kao 2003–4.
66 Interviews in Sosol and Wangeotak in 2003.
67 Interview with Abdullah Assagaf in Bandung, 28 February 2004.
68 Interviews with members of the Makayoa group.
69 Confidential interview with a Kao community leader, North Maluku, 19 January
2004.
70 Interview with Ahdan Abdul Gani, village head Samsuma village, Malifut, 2 October
2003. Confidential interviews with several Kaos in North Maluku 2003–4. Kaos state
that in August, the new sub-district head of Makian di Malifut, Husen Kuda, gave an
ultimatum to the Kaos, stating that if they did not want to join ‘please raise your feet
and get out of this new sub district’ and that ‘the houses of those who do not wish to
join will need to be burned’. The date for this speech is uncertain, but some Kaos state
that Kuda made the speech on 18 August, the day the violence occurred. As only Kaos
related this story, and no Makians, I cannot confirm it.
71 Several respondents stated that around this time the district head Abdullah Assagaf
recognized the volatility of the situation in Malifut and initially urged the district
parliament to implement PP42.
72 Confidential interview with a Makian community leader, Ternate, January 2004.
73 The Imam of Tahane mosque confirmed to me that ‘Allahu Akbar’ was shouted from
the mosque, although he said he was not present for the riot.
74 Confidential interview with a Makian community leader in Ternate.
75 Wangeotak is almost adjacent to Sosol, although the two villages are separated by
100–200 m of Makian houses.
Notes 213
76 Interview with Commander Franciscus Arisusetio, in Tobelo, 29 September 2003.
Arisusetio is now the commander of the military company (Kompi Senayan C) for
North Halmahera District.
77 The Kao community historically served as important members of the Ternate Sultan-
ate’s military forces.
78 Confidential interviews in Kao in 2003. This was also stated in an unpublished report
by GMIH, released in December 1999.
79 Interview with the sultan in Ternate, February 2004.
80 Interviews with members of the Team of Nine such as Pastor Salamena, Mr Bitjara
and Haji Muksin.
81 Confidential interview in Kao with a member of the Team of Nine.
82 Interview with the Sultan of Ternate, Mudaffar Syah, in Ternate, 17 February 2004.
Members of the Team of Nine also told me the sultan was sympathetic to their
demands, but that he told them it was difficult to circumvent a government law. This
is an important point, as the sultan is considered by many Makians to have provoked
the Kaos.
83 Confidential interview in Kao with a member of the Team of Nine.
84 Ibid.
85 Before the initial incident, Benny Bitjara was living in Kupa Kupa village, Tobelo
Sub-district, but subsequently he spent a great deal of time in Kao, overseeing Kao
military preparations. Benny Bitjara would also come to be known as Benny Doro,
‘Doro’ being the name of his village in Kao. Prior to the conflict, Benny Bitjara was in
charge of security at the Pertamina installation at Kupa Kupa. Some military prepara-
tions had been carried out simultaneously with the Kaos’ diplomatic efforts, but were
accelerated over time as the Kaos received no response from the government.
86 Unsurprisingly, each side believes the other intended to attack that day.
87 Makians I interviewed suggested that there were between 40 and 100 Makians
present. Kaos whom I interviewed, however, stated that there were as many as 600
Makian, although one Kao man who had been present guarding the border suggested
there were 200. Interview with Kao Muslim, Mohtar Ismael, in Kao, 19 January 2004.
88 Interviews with Makians in Malifut and Ternate, including Ipor, a man from the
Malifut village of Tahane, in Ternate, 15 January 2004.
89 Separate interviews with Mohtar Ismael and Darwan, Muslim Makians guarding
Kalijodo on Sunday 24 October 1999, in Kao,19 January 2004. The Kaos suggest that
the Makians timed the attack to occur during the church service (ibadah) on Sunday
morning, when most Christians would be ill prepared, and the small numbers of
Muslim Kaos on guard could be easily overrun or persuaded to join the Makians.
90 Large numbers of Makians interviewed stated the community was short of food; inter-
views in Malifut and Ternate, 2003–4. Interview with Ipor, Ternate, 15 January 2004.
91 Confidential interviews, North Maluku, 2003–4. This statement does not by any
means prove that this happened, but does add to the list of factors discussed above.
92 Most Kaos (and Tobelos) consider the communities of West Kao, often called orang
pedalaman (interior people) to be more ‘warlike’ and animist than other Kao commu-
nities: numerous interviews on Halmahera, 2003–4.
93 Interview with Benny Bitjara, Kupa Kupa village, 18 September 2003. As is almost
always the case in such events, the exact number of Kao troops is difficult to obtain.
Makian have suggested there were as many as 20,000. Benny Bitjara stated he led
15,000. However, the fact that the total population of Kao Sub-District was only
27,000 suggests that both these figures are exaggerated. The more likely figure is
probably approximately 5,000. At least some women and children were involved. No
members of the Tobelo ethnic group assisted in the attack.
94 Interview with Satta Sabar, Ternate, 4 January 2004. Satta Sabar was a community
leader in Malifut at the time of the conflict and now is a staff member in the North
Maluku District Department of Agriculture (Kantor Petanian) in Ternate. Apparently
214 Notes
Makian from Ternate and elsewhere had attempted to reach Malifut from Ternate but
had been blocked by Indonesian security forces at Sidangoli, the port village on the
western side of Halmahera.
95 Interview with Satta Sabar, 4 January 2004.
96 Interviews with Benny Bitjara, Kupa Kupa village, 18 September 2003 and Satta
Sabar, Ternate, 4 January 2004.
97 It seems likely that the schools were not destroyed because they were built with funds
from Nusa Halmahera Mineral.
98 The mosques in Malifut were subsequently ransacked and then destroyed during the
wider conflict on Halmahera.
99 Interview with Benny Bitjara. As Christians are a 20 per cent minority in North
Maluku, it is obvious why the largely Christian Kao would not want the wider popula-
tion to see the conflict as religious. The issue of the destruction of mosques in Malifut
would nevertheless become a central issue in the development of the conflict in North
Maluku.
100 A series of national laws, from the Basic Agrarian Law No. 5 1960 to the Basic
Forestry Law 1967 and the Mining Law 1968, state that customary title is recognized
only so long as it does not interfere with national and state interests. See International
Crisis Group, Communal Violence in Indonesia: Lessons from Kalimantan, Asia
Report no. 19, 27 June 2001, pp. 15–16.
101 The Imam of Mesjid Raya, Ngofagita village, in Malifut told me there had been Chris-
tian Ambonese in Kao who had been provoking local people. One Makian told a story
of how an Ambonese IDP in Wangeotak had shouted ‘Yesus menang!’ (Jesus wins!)
following a ‘spike’ during a volleyball game.
102 This required a great amount of effort as most Muslims in Ternate and elsewhere in
the region continued to view the Malifut conflict as ethnic in character (see Chapter
4).
103 The Kaos maintained civil relations with Javanese transmigrants even as conflict
broke out between Muslims and Christians in the neighbouring sub-district of Tobelo
in December 1999. Many Javanese transmigrants fled North Maluku during the
conflict, not because of attacks by Christian militia but pressure from Indonesian mili-
tary personnel, as discussed in Chapter 7.
104 There was no violence between Muslim and Christian Kaos throughout the conflict.
The two communities stayed at peace even during the religious conflict in late
December between Muslim and Christian Tobelos in Tobelo City, 100 km to the
north.
Chapter 4
1 The only location in North Maluku that did not experience violence was a small area
around the Weda Bay nickel mine in (then) Central Halmahera District. The reasons
for the absence of violence in this area are discussed in the following chapter.
2 C. Tilly, The Politics of Collective Violence, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2003, p. 119.
3 D. Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic Riot, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001,
pp. 74–5.
4 This propaganda is a form of what the Social Movements literature calls ‘framing
processes’. See for example D. McAdam et al., Comparative Perspectives on Social
Movements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, p. 8. Social Movement
theorists have argued that even dramatic changes in objective conditions will not
stimulate collective action without a process of making people aware of the nature of
their condition, the source of their grievance and their collective capacity to act
against it.
Notes 215
5 S. J. Tambiah, Leveling Crowds: Ethnonationalist Conflicts and Collective Violence
in South Asia, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996, p. 81.
6 Ibid.
7 P. R. Brass, Theft of an Idol: Text and Context in the Representation of Collective
Violence, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997, pp. 96, 177.
8 J. D. Fearon and D. D. Laitin, ‘Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Iden-
tity’, International Organization, vol. 54, no. 4 (Autumn 2000), p. 874.
9 Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic Riot, p. 73.
10 Tambiah, Leveling Crowds, p. 124.
11 S. I. Wilkinson, Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 4.
12 Ibid., p. 6.
13 Ibid., p. 5.
14 By the time of writing in 2005, the new sultan has assumed some of the traditional
authority of the Sultan of Ternate.
15 The permanent capital of North Maluku Province will be Sofifi on Halmahera. Since
the division (pemekaran) of North Maluku District in 2001 and district elections in
April 2004, Ternate has become the capital of the district of West Halmahera.
Following the district elections held in April 2004, North Maluku District was offi-
cially divided into North Halmahera (Halmahera Utara) and West Halmahera
(Halmahera Barat).
16 Of the other major parties, PPP had seven.
17 In 2004 the city also obtained municipal status.
18 Interview with a member of the Central Halmahera District parliament.
19 Most export commodities are forestry products such as plywood, agricultural prod-
ucts such as copra, clove and nutmeg, fish products (live and frozen) and minerals,
particularly nickel and gold.
20 Interviews with both Muslim and Christian respondents.
21 C. G. Kiem, Growing up in Indonesia: Youth and Social Change in a Moluccan Town,
Saarbrücken and Fort Lauderdale: Verlag Breitenbach Publishers, 1993, p. 107.
22 Most respondents agreed that Islamic norms had become more strictly enforced
following the conflict.
23 Confidential interview with a Christian refugee from Tidore in Tobelo.
24 Abu Bakar Wahid eventually led the local Islamic militia in North Maluku, the
Pasukan Jihad discussed in Chapter 7.
25 Confidential interview with a member of the Central Halmahera District parliament.
26 This information is widely acknowledged and was given to me by various respon-
dents, including a member of the North Halmahera District parliament.
27 ‘Demo Berebut Ibukota’ and ‘Para Penghianat Rakyat’, Ternate Pos, 7–13 September
1999.
28 Ternate Pos, 7–13 September 1999.
29 ‘Misteri Angka Sembilan’, Ternate Pos, 7–13 September 1999.
30 GPM also operated several churches in North Maluku along with the local Protestant
Church, GMIH.
31 See A. H. Jati, Dan Bundapun Menangis (And Mothers Weep), Manado, 2001, p. 76.
32 Ibid., p. 64.
33 Numerous interviews in Ternate, Tobelo and elsewhere. As made clear in the
previous chapter, mosques had not in fact been destroyed, largely because of the
involvement of Muslim Kaos in the attack and because Kao leaders wanted to avoid
creating the impression that the clashes were caused by religious animosity.
34 This organization collected money, food and clothing for the thousands of Makian
refugees. Interview with Wahda Zainal Imam, a candidate for the North Maluku
provincial parliament for Partai Bintang Reformasi, in Ternate, 11 February 2004. In
1999 Imam was a PPP member of the Ternate Municipality parliament.
216 Notes
35 Confidential interview with a staff member at Khairun University.
36 Several confidential interviews in Ternate, January 2004.
37 Several confidential interviews, including people who owned houses attacked by
these crowds and who were forced to run to the Central Halmahera District police and
military compounds and elsewhere.
38 The sources of this information are confidential, but include the Lurah of Mangga
Dua, a police officer, a member of Palang Merah Indonesia (the Indonesian Red
Cross), members of the district parliament and young men resident in those suburbs.
39 Confidential interview with a police officer, February 2002.
40 Confidential interview with a Tidore man living in Mangga Dua, Ternate, in Ternate,
5 February 2004. The interviewee stated that the young Makian said ‘We have to
return to Malifut because they killed us and destroyed our homes, how can you be
quiet?’ In line with the mounting claims that the Malifut incident was religious in
character, he used the term ‘we’ to refer to Muslims.
41 Confidential interview with a Makian staff member of Khairun University, in
Ternate.
42 The fact the shop owners were Chinese appears to have played little role in causing
them to be targeted for any reason other than they were Christian.
43 Confidential interview with a member of North Maluku District Police Resort
(Polres).
44 Ibid.
45 Andili is of mixed Tidore and Gorontalo heritage.
46 Interview with Wahda Zainal Imam, Ternate, 11 February 2004.
47 Interview with Ibrahim Fabanyo, Ternate, 11 February 2004.
48 Interview with Pastor Aesh, Tobelo.
49 Respondents who stated that these people produced the ‘Bloody Sosol’ letter included
a police officer from the North Maluku District Police Resort (Polres) who was
involved in the investigation into the riot, confidential interview, February 2004.
50 Confidential interview with a member of the public service in Ternate, in a refugee
camp in Manado, February 2004.
51 Confidential interview with a member of the Central Halmahera Parliament (DPRD)
in 1999. I have not provided the names of the men the respondent gave as they were
not corroborated by any other source and the information could not be verified for
publication.
52 This speech, given in the closed meeting in the district parliament, was recounted to
me by two members of that parliament.
53 Confidential interview with a member of the North Maluku District Parliament, in
Ternate, 4 January 2004. This was also told to me by other respondents in Ternate
who had not been present in the parliament.
54 Interview with senior parliamentarian, Ternate, 11 February 2004.
55 Indonesiana is so called because it was very diverse, home to a large minority of
Christians and numerous ethnic groups including Makians, Chinese, Papuans,
Makassarese and Bugis. One Makian resident of Indonesiana told me that the meeting
was announced as between Muslim and Christian community leaders, which he felt
was ‘stupid and strange’.
56 Confidential interview with a member of the Tidore ethnic group and member of the
Central Halmahera District parliament.
57 Report produced by the North Maluku Governor’s office and interviews with local
government officials in Tidore.
58 Interviews with several people in Indonesiana, Soasio, Tidore, including a local
government official, 9 February 2004.
59 Witnesses who stated that there were large numbers of Makians involved in the riot
included one Makian who lived in Indonesiana, Soasio. Confidential source.
Notes 217
60 As well as being told to me by Christian residents of Ternate, this claim is also made
in Jati, Dan Bundapun Menangis, p. 94.
61 Interview with a member of the North Maluku District parliament.
62 See for example Jati’s interview with a members of the security forces: Jati, Dan
Bundapun Menangis, p. 87.
63 Confidential interview with a Christian resident of Ternate who was sheltering in the
church at the time, now living in Kao.
64 North Maluku Provincial Government, ‘Kronologis Kerusuhan Bernuansa Sara di
Propinsi Maluku Utara’ (A Chronology of the Sectarian Riots in North Maluku Prov-
ince), April 2000. The rioters did far less damage to the Catholic church than they had
to the GPM and GMIH Protestant churches.
65 I did not undertake fieldwork in this sub-district, and therefore rely upon published
and unpublished analyses, as well as accounts given to me by people in other
sub-districts.
66 According to Nanere, Muslims attacked Christians attending prayers at church in the
village of Lola, killing all of the approximately 100 people present. The crowd
involved in the attack burned the church and Christian homes: J. Nanere, Halmahera
Berdarah (Bloody Halmahera), Ambon: Yayasan Bina Masyarakat Sejahtera dan
Pelestarian Alam (BIMASPELA), 2000, p. 92.
67 N. Bubandt, ‘The Dynamics of Reasonable Paranoia: Rumours and Riots in North
Maluku, 1999–2000’, background paper for presentation at the Seminar Series of the
School of Anthropology, Geography and Environmental Studies, University of
Melbourne, 25 April 2002, p. 24.
68 Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic Riot, p. 75. See also D. Horowitz, ‘Group Loyalty and
Ethnic Violence’, in Charles Hermann et al. (eds), Violent Conflict in the Twenty-first
Century: Causes, Instruments and Mitigation, Illinois: American Academy of Arts &
Sciences, 1999, p. 105.
69 Ten per cent of the Ternate population is Christian and perhaps 2 per cent of the
Tidore population. The outbreak of anti-Christian violence therefore undermines
arguments made by some analysts that a security dilemma is necessary for conflict to
occur. Kaufman for example argues that a mutual fear of extinction must be present
for conflict to occur: S. J. Kaufman, ‘Spiraling to Ethnic War: Elites, Masses and
Moscow in Moldova’s Civil War’, International Security, vol. 21, no. 2 (Fall 1996),
p. 109.
70 For these reasons, a coalition was formed between the sultan’s rivals for the governor-
ship, Bahar and Syamsir Andili and Thaib Armain. Until late October, in addition to
being rival candidates for the governorship, these individuals had taken different
positions on several issues, including the location of the provincial capital.
71 While in November 1999 the new North Maluku provincial parliament had not yet
been formed, it was likely to be formed on the basis of the results of the mid-year
district elections. Therefore, as in the three district parliaments, the provincial parlia-
ment would be dominated by Mudaffar Syah’s own party, Golkar, and the other major
secular, nationalist party, PDI-P. Once this parliament had been formed, its members
would then elect North Maluku’s first governor.
Chapter 5
1 Interview with a Muslim community leader in Tobelo Sub-District in 2003.
2 The realist theory in international relations argues that in an international system of
anarchy, where there is no overarching power, each state will naturally strive for its
own security, thereby threatening other states in the system.
3 B. R. Posen, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, Survival, vol. 35, no. 1, pp.
29–31.
218 Notes
4 Ibid., p. 28. See also D. A. Lake and D. Rothchild, ‘Spreading Fear: The Genesis of
Transnational Ethnic Conflict’, in D. A. Lake and D. Rothchild (eds), The Interna-
tional Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion and Escalation, Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1998.
5 J. D. Fearon, ‘Ethnic War as a Commitment Problem’, paper presented at the 1994
Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, 30
August–2 September 1995, and D. A. Lake and D. Rothchild, ‘Containing Fear: The
Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict’, International Security, vol. 21, no. 2
(Fall 1996), 41–75.
6 Lake and Rothchild, ‘Containing Fear’, p. 46.
7 Ibid., p. 47.
8 Posen, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, p. 32.
9 O. Waever et al., Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe,
London: Pinter Publishers, 1993, p. 23.
10 For an application of this concept to ethnic conflict, see P. Roe, ‘Misperception and
Ethnic Conflict: Transylvania’s Societal Security Dilemma’, Review of International
Studies, vol. 28 (2002), 57–74.
11 ‘Momentous’ events (such as religious riots elsewhere) can eradicate an individual’s
normal indifference towards their religious identity: S. Kakar, ‘The Time of Kali:
Violence between Religious Groups in India’, Social Research, vol. 67, no. 3 (Fall
2000).
12 Horowitz points to numerous riots that were preceded by rumours of impending
aggression by the group that actually becomes the eventual target: D. Horowitz, The
Deadly Ethnic Riot, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001, p. 79.
13 B. R. Weingast, ‘Constructing Trust: The Political and Economic Roots of Ethnic and
Regional Conflict’, in K. Soltan et al. (eds), Institutions and Social Order, Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press, 1998, p. 165. See also Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic
Riot, p. 319.
14 Ibid., pp. 74, 529.
15 R. S. Appleby, The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconcilia-
tion, New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, p. 69.
16 M. Juergensmeyer, Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence,
Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000, p. 146.
17 A. Hasenclever and V. Rittberger, ‘Does Religion Make a Difference? Theoretical
Approaches to the Impact of Faith on Political Conflict’, Millennium, vol. 29, no. 3
(2000), p. 656.
18 N. Z. Davis, ‘The Rites of Violence: Religious Riot in Sixteenth-Century France’,
Past and Present, vol. 59 (May 1973), pp. 81–2.
19 Ibid., p. 83.
20 Ibid., p. 85.
21 Posen, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, p. 33, and Lake and Rothchild,
‘Containing Fear’, p. 55.
22 That such situations do not always lead to violence is pointed out in J. D. Fearon and
D. D. Laitin, ‘Explaining Interethnic Cooperation’, American Political Science
Review, vol. 90, no. 4 (December 1996), p. 715.
23 ‘North Maluku in Figures, 1999’, Central Statistics Agency (Badan Pusat Statistik),
North Maluku District, Ternate.
24 Van Fraassen considers the Kao to actually be of the ‘South Tobelo’ ethnic group: C.
F. van Fraassen, ‘Types of Socio-Political Structure in North-Halmaheran History’,
in E. K. M. Masinambow (ed.), Halmahera dan Raja Ampat: Konsep dan Strategi
Penelitian (Halmahera and Raja Ampat: Research Strategies and Concepts), Jakarta:
LIPI, 1980, p. 122.
25 N. Ishige, ‘Limau Village and its Setting’, in N. Ishige (ed.), The Galela of Halmahera:
A Preliminary Survey, Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 1980, p. 8.
Notes 219
26 Togoliua is officially a sub-village (dusun) of the village of Tobe.
27 On Pela Gandong, see D. Bartels, ‘Guarding the Invisible Mountain: Intervillage
Alliances, Religious Syncretism and Ethnic Identity among Ambonese Christians and
Moslems in the Moluccas’, unpublished PhD thesis, Cornell University, 1977.
28 Interview with Ar Sidiumar, Tobelo Muslim, Tobelo City, 2003.
29 This was also the case for Christian migrants from Ambon, East Nusa Tengarra and
other areas of Indonesia. Migration similarly affected Pela Gandong in Ambon: D.
Bartels, ‘Your God is No Longer Mine: Moslem–Christian Fratricide in the Central
Moluccas (Indonesia) after a Half-Millennium of Tolerant Co-Existence and Ethnic
Unity’, unpublished article, 2000.
30 Such graffiti were very common during the conflict in 1999–2000. During my field-
work in 2003, new symbols had been added, such as ‘Taliban’ and ‘CIA’.
31 There are somewhat different versions of this story. Christians state the dispute arose
because of a linguistic misunderstanding since Bouwens’s skills in the Indonesian
language were not of a high standard. Muslims, however, and several Christians,
stated that Bouwens told the Muslim men that ‘Islam is dirty’. Several Christian
respondents also stated that during the conflict in 2000, Bouwens told them that there
was no need to be concerned because an American warship was not far from the coast
of the island of Morotai, ready to protect them against the ‘jihadist’ militia (the
Pasukan Jihad). Pastor Bouwens declined my request for an interview, citing ill
health.
32 Interview with several Christian men in the neighbourhood of Gura, Tobelo, 2003.
33 Interview with the former Sub-District Head of Tobelo, Agil Bachmid, in Ternate, 7
February 2004.
34 Several confidential sources from the Christian community in Tobelo.
35 By the time of the outbreak of violence, some Muslims in Tobelo as well as in Ternate
and elsewhere believed RMS was present in North Maluku, particularly in Tobelo.
36 Interview with a young Muslim man from Talaga who was involved in the clash, 6
January 2004. Several Christians in Tobelo also mentioned the Ibu incident.
37 Confidential interview with a Makian community leader who was asked to assist with
tents for the militia, interviewed in Ternate, January 2004. This informant refused to
assist the militia and was threatened.
38 Possible connections between this militia and the large Java-based militia of the same
name are discussed in Chapter 7.
39 I did not do fieldwork in these areas so the above information is based upon J. Nanere,
Halmahera Berdarah (Bloody Halmahera), Ambon: Yayasan Bina Masyarakat
Sejahtera dan Pelestarian Alam (BIMASPELA), 2000, pp. 91–3.
40 It is possible the government relied upon GMIH to evacuate the IDPs, but it seems
more likely that the government was unwilling to offer support to Christians given the
atmosphere at the time.
41 Interviews with several Christian respondents in Tobelo, 2003–4.
42 Interviews with several respondents in Tobelo, 2003, including Agil Bachmid,
members of FKPKHU and Muslim and Christian community leaders.
43 ‘Orang Islam adalah saudara kami, tapi etnis Makian dan Tidore adalah oknum
perusuh yang harus angkat kaki dari Kecamatan Tobelo.’ This information is given
in the Muslim account of the conflict: K. H. Ahmad and H. Oesman, Damai Yang
Terkoyak: Catatan Kelam dari Bumi Halmahera (Shattered Peace: Dark Notes from
the Land of Halmahera), Ternate: Madani Press, 2000, p. 59, n. 4. Christian respon-
dents also agreed this message was conveyed to the political delegation.
44 Several members of the Muslim community gave me this information.
45 Interview with Pastor Charles Kaya in Tobelo.
46 Interviews in Gosoma, 2003.
47 This area stretched from the port and market area around Kampung Cina, west to
Gosoma, north to Gura and south to Kaliseratus.
220 Notes
48 A senior politician and a pastor told me in confidential interviews that they notified
militia leaders of rioting in the city and requested they send Christian reinforcements,
Tobelo 2003.
49 Interview with Benny Bitjara and other leaders of the militia, as well as several
Muslim Kaos.
50 Interviews in Tobelo, Kao and Togoliua. Several men in Togoliua stated they laid the
coconut trees across the road.
51 Interviews with three Christian and three Muslim community leaders in Gamhoku, 29
January 2004. Relations between the Christian and Muslim communities in this
village had been deteriorating after the Tidore and Ternate violence and the spread of
the ‘Bloody Christmas’ rumour. Christian IDPs from Weda and Payahe were housed
in the village but no violent incidents had occurred during November or December.
52 Interview with Sakeus Odara, Tobelo, 3 September 2003. However, no Javanese were
killed in the violence.
53 Interview with Benny Bitjara in Kupa Kupa village, Tobelo Sub-District, 18
September 2003. Thanks to Father Tom Lawn for the excerpt from the psalm.
54 Interview with Benny Bitjara in Kupa Kupa village, Tobelo Sub-District, 18
September 2003.
55 Interview with a Muslim resident of Kampung Baru, 2003.
56 The claim that the soldiers did not have firearms is doubtful. Contradicting this claim,
Christians recounted how a Muslim Koramil officer had shot a Christian man
guarding a church in Gosoma.
57 Several Christian shop owners said that Christian militia had looted and destroyed
their shops.
58 Many shop owners have not yet managed to reconstruct their businesses.
59 The scarred asphalt remains as a grisly reminder of the violence.
60 Several Tobelo men told me this was common in ‘black magic’, using the
English-language term for traditional animist spiritual beliefs. The eating of hearts
was said to make one’s body feel hot (panas), and increase bravery and strength.
61 Interview with the village head of Gorua, 26 September 2003.
62 Interview with a Christian militia leader in Wari Village, Tobelo Sub-District, 17
October 2003.
63 The Kao Christian leader Hersen Tinangon told me the Kao were late returning
because they delivered the body of a Kao man to his girlfriend.
64 Interviews in Togoliua with the head of the village (Ketua Dusun), and two commu-
nity leaders, Hasan Andi Makulau and Irwan Sangaji, 23 September 2004.
65 On reports that those killed were Javanese transmigrants, see ‘Kepolisian Benarkan
216 Transmigrasi Dibantai di Mesjid Maluku Utara’ (Police Confirm 216
Transmigrants Butchered in North Maluku Mosque), Republika Online Edition, 17
January 2000; available online at: http://media.isnet.org/ambon/Republika05.html.
Accessed May 2002.
66 Interview with the pastor from the Trans Suka Maju transmigration settlement, in
Gamhoku village, Tobelo Sub-District.
67 Residents of Togoliua state that several dozen children were taken hostage during the
attack and are still being kept against their will by Christians in villages such as
Kusuri, Kupa Kupa, Efi Efi and Upa. According to residents of Togoliua these chil-
dren are currently forced to live as Christians, made to eat pork and attend Christian
services. I was not able to obtain verification of this claim nor evidence to disprove it.
68 ‘North Maluku in Figures, 1999’, Central Statistics Agency (Badan Pusat Statistik),
North Maluku District, Ternate. In 1999 the sub-district had a slightly larger male
(18,634) than female population (16,611).
69 Soasio (2,464), Dokulamo (2,166), Soatobaru (1,638), Togawa (1,558), Soakonora
(1,498), Mamuya (1,498), Duma (1,147). These figures are taken from a survey of
Notes 221
communities in the area of a volcano near Mamuya and should be taken as estimates
only.
70 There are no official statistics for the size of the religious communities in Galela.
However, one source states that the Muslim population was 20,062 and the Christian
population 11,131. See F. Adeney-Risakotta, ‘Mobilising Conflict through Media in
the North Moluccas’, seminar paper presented at Indonesian Conflict Studies
Network, Bandung, Indonesia, 7–12 April 2003, p. 16.
71 Confidential interview with Christian community leaders, in Soatobaru, 27 October
2003.
72 Numerous interviews in Galela and Tobelo, 2003 and 2004. Aditjondro mentions the
Sinar Mas interest in GAI and the banana plantation in Galela in his discussion of the
violence in Maluku: G. J. Aditjondro, ‘The Political Economy of Violence in
Maluku’, Green Left Weekly, vol. 397 (2003). However, as I have stated, I found no
evidence to suggest external actors involved in this venture had reason to provoke
unrest around the plantation, and all local respondents stated there was no connection
between the business and the conflict.
73 GMIH officials denied this.
74 Interview with Samsul Bakhri, Islamic community leader, in Soasio, 20 October
2003.
75 Interview with Syamin Basyir, Soakonora Muslim community leader, in Soakonora,
30 January 2005.
76 Confidential interview with two Christian community leaders in Soatobaru, October
2003.
77 The village head of Dokulamo, Abu Bakar Dabidabi, told me he ordered villagers in
Dokulamo not to make weapons, interview in Dokulamo, 24 October 2003.
78 Interview with the head of GMIH for Galela, Pastor Kaleb Kakale, in Tobelo, 30
January 2004.
79 Interview with several Christian men, Mamuya, 2003.
80 Interview with a Muslim community leader in Mamuya.
81 The sub-district military compound (Koramil) is located outside Soasio, perhaps 10
km from the site of the first attack.
82 The fact the Christian community was able to flee with few casualties suggests the
imam persuaded the crowd to allow them to escape. Alternatively, the size of the
attacking crowd was at this stage still small.
83 Several Muslim community leaders travelled from Gotalamo and Dokulamo to the
capital, Soasio, telling Christians manning roadblocks in Duma and Soatobaru that
they intended to inform the government that there were individuals attempting to
provoke each community in their villages.
84 Interview with Josafat Etha, Christian community leader, Duma, 16 October 2003.
85 Ibid.
86 Interview with the village head of Ngidiho, Haji Basiron Ayub, in Ngidiho, 31
January 2004.
87 Adeney-Risakotta, ‘Mobilising Conflict through Media in the North Moluccas’.
88 Interview with former Igobula village head, Haji Umar Baendi, in Igobula, 30
October 2003.
89 Interview with Yamin Galela, village head of Igobula, in Igobula, 30 October 2003.
90 Almost all Christian respondents interviewed in Tobelo believe this to have been the
case.
91 Interview with Robert Tunggal, in Tobelo, 22 January 2004.
92 Confidential interviews in Tobelo, 2003–4.
93 In some cases, community and religious leaders attempted conflict prevention initia-
tives so as not to be seen as provocateurs.
94 J. D. Fearon, ‘Rationalist Explanations for War’, International Organization, vol. 49,
222 Notes
no. 3 (Summer 1995), p. 381. See also Fearon, ‘Ethnic War as a Commitment
Problem’.
95 Interview in Pediwang, Kao Sub-District, 5 December 2003.
96 Interviews in Tobelo, 2003 and 2004.
97 Interview with the head of GMIH for Galela, Pastor Kaleb Kakale, in Tobelo, 30
January 2004.
98 This information is based on a telephone interview with Malcolm Baillie of PT Weda
Bay Nickel.
99 Confidential interview Tobelo, 2003.
100 It is not beyond the realms of possibility, however. During my fieldwork in late 2003,
a series of bombs exploded in Tobelo, almost reigniting conflict between the two
communities. After suspicions arose that the Brimob unit from Makassar stationed in
the city was responsible, popular protests drove the district head to have the unit
replaced by another, from Manado. Following this rotation, the bombing stopped.
Possible reasons for instigation of conflict by security personnel include increased
payment for operations during a civil emergency.
101 However, it is worth pointing out that most Christian leaders believe the Muslim mili-
tary commander was ‘disturbed’ because he had believed Muslims would easily
control the city.
102 Interviews with Muslim men from Gorua and Popilo and Christian men involved in
the attacks on these villages.
103 The term Forest Tobelo is used by Christopher Duncan: C. R. Duncan, ‘Savage
Imagery: (Mis)representations of the Forest Tobelo of Indonesia’, The Asia Pacific
Journal of Anthropology, vol. 2, no. 1 (2001), 45–62.
104 Ibid.
105 Two senior pastors who attempted to prevent violence were the chairman and
vice-chairman of GMIH, Pastors Aesh and S. S. Duan.
106 One pastor who provided such a service before clashes was Pastor Yacob Soselisa.
107 Christian respondents recounted several stories about Bitjara which demonstrated his
magical powers. As the Pasukan Merah attacked the south of Tobelo City on 28
December a bomb landed in front of Bitjara but failed to explode. Bitjara strode to the
bomb and kicked it back towards the Muslim guard post, where it exploded and killed
several men. The story of Bitjara catching a bullet with only a slight injury to his hand
was also widely known and believed among Christians in north Halmahera.
Chapter 6
1 V. P. Gagnon, ‘Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict: The Case of Serbia’,
International Security, vol. 19, no. 3 (Winter 1994/95), p. 132. For example, in Yugo-
slavia, following threats to their positions and power after the fall of the Soviet Union,
a wide coalition of ‘conservatives in the Serbian party leadership, local and regional
party elites … orthodox Marxist intellectuals … and parts of the nationalist army
provoked a conflict along ethnic lines’, ibid., p. 142.
2 J. Snyder, From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict, New
York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000, p .39.
3 For example, in his discussion of the transition from Soviet authoritarian rule to
democracy in the Caucasus, Snyder argues that the prevalence of kin-based patronage
networks were irreconcilable with democratic processes: ibid., p. 204.
4 P. R. Brass, The Production of Hindu–Muslim Violence in Contemporary India, New
Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 231.
5 Brass also used this term in Theft of an Idol: Text and Context in the Representation of
Collective Violence, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997, p. 208.
6 P. R. Brass, ‘Introduction: Discourses of Ethnicity, Communalism, and Violence’, in
Notes 223
P. R. Brass (ed.), Riots and Pogroms, New York: New York University Press, 1996,
p. 13.
7 Brass, The Production of Hindu–Muslim Violence, pp. 117, 242.
8 Brass, ‘Introduction: Discourses of Ethnicity, Communalism, and Violence’, p. 15.
9 S. I. Wilkinson, Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, p. 4.
10 Ibid., p. 5.
11 D. Keen, The Economic Functions of Violence in Civil Wars, Adelphi Paper 320,
London: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 12.
12 Brass, The Production of Hindu–Muslim Violence, p. 362.
13 Interviews in Ternate, 2003–4.
14 This information is widely acknowledged and was given to me by various respon-
dents including a member of the North Halmahera District parliament. Sofifi eventu-
ally became the permanent provincial capital.
15 Numerous interviews in Ternate and elsewhere in North Maluku, 2003–4.
16 ‘Demo Berebut Ibukota’ and ‘Para Penghianat Rakyat’, Ternate Pos, 7–13 September
1999. The demonstrators held banners claiming ‘Bahar and Syamsir Andili are provo-
cateurs’ (‘Bahar – Syamsir Andili provokator’).
17 The full title of the law is Undang Undang Nomor 46/1999 Tentang Pembentukan
Propinsi Maluku Utara, Kabupaten Buru, Dan Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara Barat
(Law 46/1999 on the Formation of North Maluku Province, Buru District and West
Southeast Maluku District).
18 As at the time of writing, construction of government facilities is still taking place in
the village of Sofifi.
19 Confidential interviews in Ternate, 2003–4.
20 The figure of 4,000 is cited in S. Alhadar, ‘Anatomi Kerusuhan Sosial di Maluku
Utara’ (The Anatomy of the Social Riots in North Maluku), in I. Hasan (ed.),
Memikirkan Kembali: Maluku dan Maluku Utara (Rethinking: Maluku and North
Maluku), Makassar: Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Hasanuddin (LEPHAS), 2003,
p. 121.
21 Other pieces of graffiti stated ‘Jesus is an animal’ and ‘Jesus is a drunk’.
22 Several residents of Ternate claimed the Pasukan Kuning included many Christians
from Halmahera. Respondents included Haji Kotu, a prominent member of the militia
that would eventually oppose the sultan, the Pasukan Putih, interviewed in Ternate, 3
January 2004.
23 Some respondents stated they were outraged at this behaviour as the members of
Pasukan Kuning often could not read their identity cards
24 Confidential interview with a member of the Pasukan Kuning.
25 Interviews with several Makians in Ternate, 2003–4.
26 T. A. Tomagola, ‘Krisis dan Solusi Tragedi Maluku Utara’, Detikcom, 2 February
2000.
27 This was stated to me both by members of the Pasukan Putih as well as more tradi-
tional supporters of the sultan.
28 Confidential interview in Ternate, 2003.
29 Interview with Abu Bakar Wahid in Tomalou, Tidore, 7 January 2004. Abu Bakar
Wahid is of mixed Makian/Tidore descent, and, according to several respondents,
prior to the conflict in North Maluku had ties to Thaib Armain.
30 Interview with Abu Bakar Wahid in Tomalou, Tidore, 7 January 2004.
31 As will be seen in the next chapter, after leading the Pasukan Putih during the
Putih–Kuning conflict, Selang would also become the leader of the Laskar
Mujahidin, the Ternate branch of the regional Islamic militia, the Pasukan Jihad.
32 Following the violence in Tobelo and Galela the Pasukan Putih in Ternate and Tidore
became commonly known as the Pasukan Jihad.
33 Interviews with several residents of Kampung Pisang and Maliaro in 2004.
224 Notes
34 Interview with a young man in Tomalou, Tidore.
35 Interview with man from Dufa Dufa, Sucipto, in Ternate, 15 January 2004.
36 Interview in Ternate, 3 January 2003.
37 Interview with the Sultan of Tidore, Djafar Junus Sjah, in Soasio, Tidore, 9 January
2004.
38 Confidential interviews in Soasio, Tidore, 2004.
39 Interview with the Sultan of Tidore, in Soasio, Tidore, 9 January 2004.
40 Confidential interview with a member of the sultanate government, in Soasio, Tidore,
2004.
41 Interview with a senior member of the Tidore traditional guards, in Soasio, Tidore,
2004.
42 After the Pasukan Kuning had dispersed, several houses owned by Christians were
destroyed in northern Ternate City.
43 Interview with the Sultan of Ternate, in Ternate, 17 February 2004.
44 The higher estimate is given in Yurnaldi, ‘Dendam yang tak Berkesudahan’ (Revenge
without End) in Hasan, Memikirkan Kembali, and ‘Dendam yang tak Berkesudahan’,
Kompas, 2 January 2000.
45 Interview with the Sultan of Tidore.
46 See for example Kompas, 22 January 2000.
47 Bahar Andili would eventually die of natural causes during his campaign to become
governor.
48 S. Alhadar, ‘Tragedi Maluku Utara’, Republika, 18 January 2000.
49 S. Alhadar, ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’, Inside Indonesia, no. 63
(July–September 2000).
50 K. H. Ahmad and H. Oesman, Damai Yang Terkoyak: Catatan Kelam dari Bumi
Halmahera (Shattered Peace: Dark Notes from the Land of Halmahera), Ternate:
Madani Press, 2000, p. xxi.
51 Interview with Ibrahim Fabanyo, deputy chairman of North Maluku District parlia-
ment, in Ternate, 11 February 2004.
52 Interview with Mudaffar Syah, Sultan of Ternate, and several other respondents in
Ternate, 2003–4.
53 Confidential interview with a member of the Pasukan Kuning in Dufa Dufa, Ternate
City.
54 Several interviews in North Maluku 2003–4. Interview respondents included
members of the Tidore ethnic group residing in central and south Ternate, and on
Tidore.
55 This was stated to me by members of the Pasukan Putih as well as more traditional
supporters of the sultan.
56 Snyder, From Voting to Violence, p. 39.
57 Interview with Muhammad Selang, in Ternate, 7 February 2004.
58 Interview with Haji Kotu, in Ternate, 3 January 2004.
59 Interview with a young Muslim man who joined the Pasukan Putih, in Tomalou,
Tidore, 15 February 2004.
60 Alhadar, ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’.
61 Brass, ‘Introduction: Discourses of Ethnicity, Communalism, and Violence’, p. 13.
62 The police assumed primary responsibility for internal security and law and order,
including responding to both communal conflict and violent insurgency.
63 Thaib Armain would eventually be elected North Maluku’s first governor after Bahar
Andili’s untimely death from natural causes during campaigning. The North Maluku
provincial parliament’s first choice for governor, a former Suharto minister, Abdul
Gafur, was overturned following accusations of corruption.
Notes 225
Chapter 7
1 F. Polletta and J. M. Jasper, ‘Collective Identity and Social Movements’, Annual
Review of Sociology, vol. 27 (2001), p. 284.
2 J. R. Seul, ‘Ours Is the Way of God: Religion, Identity, and Intergroup Conflict’,
Journal of Peace Research, vol. 36, no. 5 (1999), p. 558.
3 Ibid., p. 559.
4 Other studies have discussed the violence inherent in sacred texts and I will not
attempt to do so here; see, for example, B. Moore Jr, Moral Purity and Persecution in
History, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
5 F. M. Donner, ‘The Sources of Islamic Conceptions of War’, in J. Kelsay and J. T.
Johnson (eds), Just War and Jihad: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives on War
and Peace in Western and Islamic Traditions, Westport: Greenwood Press, 1991, p. 47.
6 Taken from B. Tibi, ‘War and Peace in Islam’, in S. H. Hashmi (ed.), Islamic Political
Ethics: Civil Society, Pluralism, and Conflict, Princeton: Princeton University Press,
2002, p. 179.
7 Ibid.
8 Donner, ‘The Sources of Islamic Conceptions of War’, p. 47.
9 P. L. Heck, ‘Jihad Revisited’, Journal of Religious Ethics, vol. 32, no. 1, p. 97.
10 Ibid., pp. 97–8.
11 J. Fox, ‘Do Religious Institutions Support Violence or the Status Quo?’, Studies in
Conflict and Terrorism, vol. 22 (1999), p. 120.
12 R. S. Appleby, The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconcilia-
tion, New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, p. 69.
13 See, for example, A. Hasenclever and V. Rittberger, ‘Does Religion Make a Differ-
ence? Theoretical Approaches to the Impact of Faith on Political Conflict’, Millen-
nium, vol. 29, no. 3 (2000), 641–74.
14 S. Bruce, Politics and Religion, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003, p. 84; S. Bruce, ‘Reli-
gion and Violence: What Can Sociology Offer?’, Numen, vol. 52 (2005), p. 16.
15 Mujahid, meaning a participant in holy war, is the term used by most North Maluku
Muslims to refer to participants in the jihad.
16 Interview in Malifut in 2003.
17 Several interviews in Ternate, 2003–4, and interview with Abu Bakar Wahid in
Tomalou, Tidore, 7 January 2004.
18 Ternate Pos, 25 April–1 May 2000.
19 Several interviews in Ternate, 2003–4.
20 Interview in Tomalou, Tidore, 7 January 2004.
21 Ibid.
22 For example interview with North Maluku historian Herry Nachrawy, in Ternate, 14
January 2004.
23 Christian militia members in Tobelo told me they were angry to see Muslims carrying
red-and-white Indonesian flags in clashes with fellow Indonesians.
24 See, for example, C. G. Kiem, Growing up in Indonesia: Youth and Social Change in
a Moluccan Town, Saarbrücken and Fort Lauderdale: Verlag Breitenbach Publishers,
1993, p. 54.
25 Interviews with all those mentioned, in Tobelo 2003–4. No separatist sentiment was
conveyed to me during fieldwork in 2003 and 2004.
26 Interviews in Tobelo Sub-District, 2003.
27 Interview with Muhammad Albar, in Ternate, 10 February 2004.
28 For example interview with one young Muslim man from the Tidore ethnic group, in
Ternate, 5 February 2004.
29 Interview in Tomalou, Tidore, 7 January 2004.
30 Several interviews in Ternate in 2003–4. It is impossible to verify this claim but this
tension between the former leadership of the militia was still manifest in early 2004.
226 Notes
31 Numerous interviews in Tobelo, Galela and Kao 2003–4.
32 Interviews with Christians in Duma, Tobelo and elsewhere in North Maluku, 2003–4.
See J. Nanere, Halmahera Berdarah (Bloody Halmahera), Ambon: Yayasan Bina
Masyarakat Sejahtera dan Pelestarian Alam (BIMASPELA), 2000, p. 156 for a list of
the identification cards allegedly found on mujahid.
33 Interview in Tobelo, 11 January 2003. Several Christians also claim that one Afghan
was identified among the dead, although this seems unlikely.
34 Interview with Christopher Selong, Duma, 17 October 2003.
35 Nanere, Halmahera Berdarah, p. 154.
36 T. A. Tomagola, ‘The Bleeding Halmahera of North Moluccas’, Jurnal Studi Indo-
nesia, vol. 10, no. 2 (2000), p. 7.
37 N. Hasan, ‘Faith and Politics: The Rise of the Laskar Jihad in the Era of Transition in
Indonesia’, Indonesia, vol. 73 (April 2002), p. 159.
38 Salafism, a very puritan stream of the Saudi Wahhabist doctrine, demands a literal
reading of the Qu’ran and application of sharia. Indonesian salafi leaders often seek
guidance from sheikhs in Saudi Arabia and Yemen.
39 For a good discussion of FKAWJ, see Hasan, ‘Faith and Politics’.
40 Ibid., p. 159.
41 Ibid., p. 165.
42 For a good discussion of the operations of the Laskar Jihad, see International Crisis
Group, Indonesia: Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku, Asia Report no. 10, 19
December 2000.
43 While the attitude of military personnel to Laskar Jihad varied from unit to unit, in
general the militia was not initially opposed by the military, although clashes between
the two did occur later in 2001.
44 International Crisis Group, Indonesia: The Search for Peace in Maluku, Asia Report
no. 31, 8 February 2002, p. 14. Military support for Laskar Jihad seems to have begun
with the training of militia members by military personnel at Bogor near Jakarta.
Reports claimed that when members of Laskar Jihad arrived in Ambon, military
personnel provided them with weapons: G. Fealy, ‘Inside the Laskar Jihad – An Inter-
view with the Leader of a New, Radical and Militant Sect’, Inside Indonesia, 31
March 2001, p. 29
45 See the various June 2000 reports of the Crisis Centre, Diocese of Amboina.
46 R. W. Hefner, ‘Civic Pluralism Denied? The New Media and Jihadi Violence in Indo-
nesia’, in D. F. Eickelman and J. W. Anderson (eds), New Media in the Muslim
World: The Emerging Public Sphere, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999,
p. 3. Hefner writes that Western intelligence reports suggest army officers transferred
US$9.3 million to Laskar Jihad, ibid., p. 10.
47 Maluku Hari Ini, 18 July 2000.
48 Jakarta Post, 7 April 2000.
49 Interviews with Abu Bakar Wahid, Muhammad Selang, Muhammad Albar in Tidore
and Ternate, and with Samsul Bakhri in Soasio, Galela, 20 October 2003.
50 For example interview with Ahmad Pilo, a sub-district Muslim community leader in
Ngidiho, Galela, 21 October 2003.
51 This information is consistent with interviews conducted by Professor Harold Crouch
with members of Laskar Jihad: personal communication.
52 Interview with Abu Bakar Wahid, in Tomalou, Tidore, 7 January 2004.
53 Interview with Muhammad Albar in Ternate, 10 February 2004.
54 Ibid.
55 Interview with Muhammad Selang in Ternate, 7 February 2004.
56 Ibid.
57 The group’s leader was another Islamic preacher of Yemeni descent, Habib Rizieq
Shihab, a sayyid or descendant of the prophet Muhammad.
58 FPI appeared to have contacts with military and police officers, including senior
Notes 227
personnel such as former General Wiranto. It is unlikely that senior officers shared the
goals of FPI, but may have utilized the organization as an expedient way of mobi-
lizing large numbers of people at certain times.
59 ‘500,000 Jihad Legion Supporters Gather in North Maluku Province’, The Indonesian
Observer, 24 April 2000. As North Maluku has a population of 800,000, it is clear
500,000 was a substantial overestimate. See also ‘Islamic Defenders Reject Reconcil-
iation over Maluku Conflict’, Antara, 26 April 2000.
60 Interview with Muhammad Selang in Ternate, 7 February 2004.
61 Respondents include Makian and Tidore men in Ternate and Dan Murphy, a jour-
nalist with the Christian Science Monitor: personal communication in Ternate,
February 2004.
62 Confidential interview in Ternate, 12 February 2004.
63 Interview with Abu Bakar Wahid, in Tomalou, Tidore, 7 January 2004.
64 A Bubalo and G. Fealy, Joining the Caravan? The Middle East, Islamism and Indo-
nesia, Lowy Institute Paper 5, New South Wales: Lowy Institute for International
Policy, 2005, p. 79.
65 Ibid., p. 81.
66 International Crisis Group, Al-Qaeda in Southeast Asia: The Case of the ‘Ngruki
Network’ in Indonesia, Asia Briefing no. 20, 8 August 2002, p. 19.
67 International Crisis Group, Indonesia Backgrounder: How the Jemaah Islamiyah
Terrorist Network Operates, Asia Report no. 43, 11 December 2002, pp. 3–4.
68 Subsequently, members of Jemaah Islamiyah have been responsible for the worst
terrorist attacks carried out in Indonesia. On 12 October 2002 a Jemaah Islamiyah cell
detonated two large bombs targeted at two nightclubs in Kuta, Bali, attempting to kill
Westerners. The bombings killed 202 people, both Westerners and Indonesians, and
injured a further 300. In August 2003 the organization exploded a bomb in front of the
American-owned J. W. Marriot hotel killing 12 people, and in September 2004 deto-
nated a car bomb in front of the Australian Embassy killing nine.
69 International Crisis Group, How the Jemaah Islamiyah Terrorist Network Operates,
p. 22.
70 Abu Jibril was deported from Malaysia to Indonesia and has not been charged with
being a member of JI in Indonesia.
71 This recording is discussed in D. Murphy, ‘Al Qaeda’s New Frontier: Indonesia’,
Christian Science Monitor, 1 May 2002.
72 Interview with Abu Bakar Wahid, in Tomalou, Tidore, 7 January 2004.
73 When other members of Jemaah Islamiyah arrived in North Maluku after the conflict,
they appear to have been disappointed that violence had ended. See International
Crisis Group, How the Jemaah Islamiyah Terrorist Network Operates, p. 24.
74 In 2001 in Ambon, Laskar Jihad members, under the leadership of Ja’far, executed a
militia member who had been sentenced to death under sharia.
75 Interview with Samsul Bakhri in Soasio, Galela, 20 October 2003.
76 Interviews with Muhammad Selang and Muhammad Albar in Ternate, 7 February
2004 and 10 February 2004. Some analysts have also reported that some Ambonese
Muslims, while at first welcoming the protection afforded by Laskar Jihad, soon
resented the imposition of a stricter form of Islam, as well as the continuing violence.
This was demonstrated in the July 2000 statement by the Ambon Secretary of Majelis
Ulama Indonesia, Malik Selang, that all external actors should leave Maluku: Crisis
Centre, Diocese of Amboina, report no. 25, 25 July 2000.
77 I did not undertake fieldwork on this island or interview anybody involved. This
information was taken from interviews with IDPs from Lata Lata in Ambon posted on
the internet by the Masariku Network: www.malra.org/posko/malra.php4?oid=
151531. It must be noted that all these accounts are given by Christians and I cannot
confirm their accuracy.
78 According to this account, by early February the entire village had been forcibly
228 Notes
converted to Islam and all men, women and children circumcised. According to an
individual who had interviewed the Lata Lata IDPs, Brawijaya 511 Battalion military
personnel supervised the procedures and remained on the island supervising mosque
attendance and other Islamic practices: interview in North Sulawesi, 2004.
79 Nanere, Halmahera Berdarah, p. 154.
80 Information received from a former NHM employee, 2005.
81 Interview with Abu Bakar Wahid, in Tomalou, Tidore, 7 January 2004. One
well-informed attendee at a seminar where I presented a photograph of the mujahid
leaving Tidore believed it was very likely that the vessels in question were Indonesian
Navy gunships.
82 Interview in Pediwang, Kao, 5 December 2003.
83 NHM began evacuating further personnel to a ship berthed at Tanjung Barnabas port
by helicopter. On 24 January NHM provided a helicopter to fly the national Human
Rights Commissioner, Bambang Suharto, in to the area to talk to both parties,
although this visit appears to have achieved little.
84 It was impossible for a Kao parliamentarian to return to Ternate during the conflict
and any requests to the government had to be made by telephone.
85 Some reports apparently stated that the militia was targeting several Ambonese staff
members of PT NHM.
86 Interview with leader of the Pasukan Merah in Kao, 2003. According to the militia
leader, the Kaos were able to convince the military unit commander, and through him
the mujahid, that the Pasukan Jihad was surrounded by Kaos. According to him it was
for this reason the Muslims left the area.
87 Several interviews in Ternate 2003–4.
88 Interview with Pasukan Merah leader Sakeus Odara in Tobelo, 3 September 2003.
89 Interview with Nasrun Alih, the leader of Al Istiklama militia in Igobula, 31 October
2003.
90 Interview with Eddie Tobelo, Pasukan Merah militia member, in Wari, Tobelo, 3
September 2003.
91 Interviews with Eddie Tobelo and with Nasrun Alih, leader of the Al Istiklama militia,
in Igobula, 31 October 2003, both of whom were present on opposite sides of this
ambush. A large number of Christians believe that a Christian leader from Duma gave
information about their movements to the Muslim militia in exchange for money.
92 For example, Sakeus Odara and Cornelis Hohakay were shot and wounded while
attempting to reach Galela.
93 Interview with the village head of Gorua, Tobelo, 26 September 2003.
94 One Muslim man from Tobelo who returned to Galela stated he was ready to attack
Tobelo City ‘if he had to’: interview with a Muslim community leader in Tobelo City,
19 September 2003. As discussed below, the Pasukan Jihad did not attack Tobelo for
several reasons.
95 Nanere writes that 31 members of the Pasukan Jihad died in the attacks and Chris-
tians found Indonesian name cards revealing that victims were not just from Ternate
but also Surabaya. Also found, according to Nanere, were two name cards of military
personnel from a Brawijaya battalion near Surabaya: Nanere, Halmahera Berdarah,
pp. 155–6.
96 Interview with approximately 15 Christians in Mamuya, 29 October 2003.
97 Interview with the village head, Mamuya,
98 Interview in Ternate, 5 February 2004.
99 Interview with Yamin Galela, village head of Igobula, in Igobula, 30 October 2003.
100 Interview with Samuel Kukus, leader of the Duma Christian militia, in Tobelo, 26
January 2004.
101 Interviews with both Christian and Muslim respondents present on 19 June, in Galela
and Tobelo, 2003–4.
102 Interview with Samuel Kukus, leader of the Duma Christian militia, in Tobelo, 26
Notes 229
January 2004. According to Kukus, the military personnel guarding the northern edge
of the village laughed at the Christian militia as they withdrew.
103 In 2003 as Duma Christians were preparing to return to their homes, their gardens
were destroyed once more, leaving many local Christians still unable to establish
economic sustainability.
104 Interview with Nasrun Alih, kapita of Al Istikama militia in Igobula, 31 October 2003.
105 The kinds of atrocities that had been committed in Tobelo Sub-District are also said to
have occurred in the fighting in Duma and elsewhere in Galela. In Duma some Chris-
tian men were said to have engaged in the practice of eating the hearts of Muslim
victims. Interview with a Christian community leader in Duma, October 2003.
106 This may explain why several Galela men told me they demanded that external
mujahid should not join a certain attack against Duma, as their fear during battle
allegedly lowered the morale of the local men.
107 Interview with Abu Bakar Wahid, in Tomalou, Tidore, 7 January 2004.
108 The Ternate Pos quotes a police officer as stating that 19,000 homemade firearms,
machetes, spears and other weapons were surrendered or taken from citizens in this
amnesty: Ternate Pos, 15–21 July 2000.
109 Confidential interview with a Christian missionary in Manado, February 2004.
110 International Crisis Group, Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku, p. 12.
111 Interview with Muhammad Selang in Ternate, 7 February 2004.
112 Under the concept of jihad, any war against non-believers who had previously
attacked Muslims is generally permissible: Tibi, ‘War and Peace in Islam’, p. 178.
113 Confidential interview with a Protestant pastor in Tobelo City, 2003.
114 Certain Muslim community leaders certainly opposed the jihad, arguing the condi-
tions for jihad were not present.
115 From a quantitative study of ethno-religious conflicts Fox has concluded that
‘whether religious institutions promote protests is highly dependent upon whether the
religion itself is threatened’: Fox, ‘Do Religious Institutions Support Violence of the
Status Quo?’, p. 131.
116 Clearly this decision was also taken in the context of believing that the military
personnel stationed in the area would assist in protecting the village.
117 R. Cribb, ‘Introduction: Problems in the Historiography of the Killings in Indonesia’,
in R. Cribb (ed.), The Indonesian Killings 1965–1966, Victoria: Aristoc Press, 1990.
118 Despite some tension, no violence erupted between Muslims and Christians in Kao
village.
119 Interview with Theo Sosebeko, in Tobelo, 1 November 2003.
120 See Ternate Pos, 2–8 May 2000, which reports GMIH Pastor Rudi Tindage
explaining why Christians refused the entry of non-local military units.
121 Interview with Muhammad Selang in Ternate, 7 February 2004.
122 Interview with a member of the Pasukan Jihad, in Ternate, February 2004.
123 Several interviews in Waringinlamo, 3 November 2003.
124 Ibid.
Conclusion
1 J. Snyder, From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict, New
York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000, p. 39
2 D. Horowitz, Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Berkeley: University of California Press,
1985, p. 166.
3 See for example D. Horowitz, The Deadly Ethnic Riot, Berkeley: University of Cali-
fornia Press, 2001, p. 75.
4 See for example N. Bubandt, ‘The Dynamics of Reasonable Paranoia: Rumours and
Riots in North Maluku, 1999–2000’, background paper for presentation at the
230 Notes
Seminar Series of the School of Anthropology, Geography and Environmental
Studies, University of Melbourne, 25 April 2002, p. 24, and S. Alhadar, ‘The
Forgotten War in North Maluku’, Inside Indonesia, no. 63 (July–September 2000).
5 As discussed in Chapter 5, the only area not to experience violence was the immediate
vicinity of the Weda Bay nickel mine in Central Halmahera District.
6 For claims that a great deal of the violence in reformasi-period Indonesia was insti-
gated in a covert fashion by actors associated with the New Order regime, see for
example G. J. Aditjondro, ‘Guns, Pamphlets and Handy-Talkies: How the Military
Exploited Local Ethno-religious Tensions in Maluku to Preserve Their Political and
Economic Privileges”, in I. Wessel and G. Wimhofer (eds), Violence in Indonesia,
Hamburg: Abera Verlag Markus Voss, 2001, and K. O’Rourke, Reformasi: The
Struggle for Power in Post-Soeharto Indonesia, St Leonards: Allen & Unwin, 2002.
7 See for example, A. Hasenclever and V. Rittberger, ‘Does Religion Make a Differ-
ence? Theoretical Approaches to the Impact of Faith on Political Conflict’, Millen-
nium, vol. 29, no. 3 (2000), 641–74
8 J. Snyder, ‘Anarchy and Culture: Insights from the Anthropology of War,’ Interna-
tional Organization, vol. 56, no. 1 (Winter 2002), p. 34.
9 S. N. Kalyvas, ‘The Ontology of “Political Violence”: Action and Identity in Civil
Wars’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 1, no. 3 (September 2003), pp. 475–6.
Bibliography
Abdullah, Muksin H., ‘Kerusuhan Maluku Utara Dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya’ (The
North Maluku Riots in a Socio-cultural Perspective), in I. Hasan (ed.), Memikirkan
Kembali: Maluku dan Maluku Utara (Rethinking: Maluku and North Maluku),
Makassar: Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Hasanuddin (LEPHAS), 2003.
Adeney-Risakotta, F., ‘Mobilising Conflict through Media in the North Moluccas’, seminar
paper presented at Indonesian Conflict Studies Network, Bandung, Indonesia, 7–12
April 2003.
Aditjondro, G. J., ‘Guns, Pamphlets and Handy-Talkies: How the Military Exploited Local
Ethno-religious Tensions in Maluku to Preserve Their Political and Economic Privi-
leges’, in I. Wessel and G. Wimhofer (eds), Violence in Indonesia, Hamburg: Abera
Verlag Markus Voss, 2001.
—— ‘The Political Economy of Violence in Maluku’, Green Left Weekly, vol. 397 (2003).
—— ‘Kerusuhan Poso dan Morowali, Akar Permasalahan dan Jalan Keluarnya’ (The Poso
and Morowali Riots, the Roots of the Problem and the Way Out), paper presented at
seminar on Application of Emergency Status in Aceh, Papua and Poso?, Hotel Santika,
Jakarta, 7 January 2004.
Ahmad, K. H. and Oesman, H., Damai Yang Terkoyak: Catatan Kelam dari Bumi
Halmahera (Shattered Peace: Dark Notes from the Land of Halmahera), Ternate:
Madani Press, 2000.
Alhadar, S., ‘The Forgotten War in North Maluku’, Inside Indonesia, no. 63 (July–September
2000). Available online at: www.insideindonesia.org/edit63/alhadar.htm.
—— ‘Anatomi Kerusuhan Sosial di Maluku Utara’ (The Anatomy of the Social Riots in
North Maluku), in I. Hasan (ed.), Memikirkan Kembali: Maluku dan Maluku Utara
(Rethinking: Maluku and North Maluku), Makassar: Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas
Hasanuddin (LEPHAS), 2003.
—— ‘Kompleksitas Konflik Di Halmahera Utara’ (The Complexity of the Conflict in
North Halmahera), in I. Hasan (ed.), Memikirkan Kembali: Maluku dan Maluku Utara
(Rethinking: Maluku and North Maluku), Makassar: Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas
Hasanuddin (LEPHAS), 2003.
Al-Jakartaty, E., Tragedi Bumi Seribu Pulau (The Tragedy of the Land of a Thousand
Islands), Yakarta: Gubuk Kajian Mutiara Nasional, 2000.
Aminzade, R. R and McAdam, D., ‘Emotions and Contentious Politics’, in R. R. Aminzade,
J. A. Goldstone, D. McAdam, E. J. Perry, W. H. Sewell Jr, S. Tarrow and C. Tilly (eds),
Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press, 2001, pp. 14–50.
232 Bibliography
Ammari, F. and Siokona, J. W. (eds), Ternate: Kelahiran dan Sejarah sebuah Kota
(Ternate: The Birth and History of a City), Ternate: Ternate City Government, 2003.
Andaya, L. Y., The World of Maluku: Eastern Indonesia in the Early Modern Period,
Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1993.
Appleby, R. S., The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation,
New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
Aragon, L. V., ‘Communal Violence in Poso, Central Sulawesi: Where People Eat Fish and
Fish Eat People’, Indonesia, vol. 72 (October 2001), 45–79.
Arfi, B., ‘Ethnic Fear: The Social Construction of Insecurity, Security Studies, vol. 8, no. 1
(Autumn 1998), 151–203.
Azra, A., ‘The Islamic Factor in Post-Soeharto Indonesia’, in C. Manning and P. van
Dierman (eds), Indonesia in Transition: Social Aspects of Reformasi and Crisis, Singa-
pore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2000.
Badan Pusat Statistik, Bappenas and UNDP, Indonesia Human Development Report 2001.
Towards a New Consensus: Democracy and Human Development in Indonesia, Jakarta,
2001.
Bartels, D., ‘Guarding the Invisible Mountain: Intervillage Alliances, Religious Syncretism
and Ethnic Identity among Ambonese Christians and Moslems in the Moluccas’, unpub-
lished PhD thesis, Cornell University, 1977.
—— ‘Your God is No Longer Mine: Moslem–Christian Fratricide in the Central Moluccas
(Indonesia) after a Half-Millennium of Tolerant Co-Existence and Ethnic Unity’,
unpublished article, 2000.
Bertrand, J., ‘Legacies of the Authoritarian Past: Religious Violence in Indonesia’s
Moluccan Islands’, Pacific Affairs, vol. 75, no. 1 (2002), 57–85.
—— Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Indonesia, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2004.
Blumer, H., Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Berkeley: Prentice Hall,
1969.
Boediman, M. D., ‘Musuhku adalah Saudarku’ (My Enemy is My Brother), Unpublished
thesis, Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana, Yogyakarta, 2002.
Bohm, C. J., ‘Brief Chronicle of the Unrest in the Moluccas 1999–2001’, Crisis Centre,
Diocese of Amboina.
Bourchier, D., ‘Skeletons, Vigilantes, and the Armed Forces’ Fall from Grace’, in A.
Budiman, B. Hatley and D. Kingsbury (eds), Reformasi: Crisis and Change in Indo-
nesia, Clayton: Monash Asia Institute, 1999.
Brass, P. R. (ed.), Ethnic Groups and the State, London: Croom Helm, 1985.
—— ‘Introduction: Discourses of Ethnicity, Communalism, and Violence’, in P. R. Brass
(ed.), Riots and Pogroms, New York: New York University Press, 1996.
—— Theft of an Idol: Text and Context in the Representation of Collective Violence,
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
—— The Production of Hindu–Muslim Violence in Contemporary India, New Delhi:
Oxford University Press, 2003.
Brubaker, R. and Laitin, D. D., ‘Ethnic and Nationalist Violence’, Annual Review of Soci-
ology, vol. 24 (1998), 423–52.
Bruce, S., Politics and Religion, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.
—— ‘Religion and Violence: What Can Sociology Offer?’, Numen, vol. 52 (2005), 5–28.
Bubalo, A. and Fealy, G., Joining the Caravan? The Middle East, Islamism and Indonesia,
Lowy Institute Paper 5, New South Wales: Lowy Institute for International Policy,
2005.
Bibliography 233
Bubandt, N., ‘Malukan Apocalypse: Themes in the Dynamics of Violence in Eastern Indo-
nesia’, in I. Wessel and G. Wimhofer (eds), Violence in Indonesia, Hamburg: Abera
Verlag Markus Voss, 2001.
—— ‘The Dynamics of Reasonable Paranoia: Rumours and Riots in North Maluku,
1999–2000’, background paper for presentation at the Seminar Series of the School of
Anthropology, Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Melbourne, 25
April 2002.
—— ‘Towards a New Politics of Tradition? Decentralisation, Conflict, and Adat in Eastern
Indonesia’, Antropologi Indonesia, no. 74 (May–August 2004), 11–30.
Chauvel, R., ‘Ambon: Not a Revolution but a Counterrevolution’, in A. R. Kahin (ed.),
Regional Dynamics of the Indonesian Revolution: Unity from Diversity, Honolulu:
University of Hawaii Press, 1985.
—— Nationalists, Soldiers and Separatists: The Ambonese Islands from Colonialism to
Revolt 1880–1950, Leiden: KITLV Press, 1990.
Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A., ‘On Economic Causes of Civil War’, Oxford Economic Papers,
vol. 50, no. 4 (1998), 563–73.
—— ‘Greed and Grievance in Civil War’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no.
2355, Washington, DC: World Bank, October 2001.
Cribb, R., ‘Introduction: Problems in the Historiography of the Killings in Indonesia’, in R.
Cribb (ed.), The Indonesian Killings 1965–1966: Studies from Java and Bali, Centre of
Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University, 1990.
Crouch, H., ‘Wiranto and Habibie: Military–Civilian Rrelations since May 1998’, in A.
Budiman, B. Hatley and D. Kingsbury (eds), Reformasi: Crisis and Change in Indo-
nesia, Clayton: Monash Asia Institute, 1999.
—— ‘Political Update: Megawati’s Holding Operation’, in E Aspinall and G. Fealy (eds),
Local Power and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralization and Democratization. Singa-
pore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2003.
Davidson, J. S., ‘The Politics of Violence on an Indonesian Periphery’, South East Asia
Research, vol. 11, no. 1, 59–89.
Davis, Natalie Zemon, ‘The Rites of Violence: Religious Riot in Sixteenth-Century
France’, Past and Present, vol. 59 (May 1973), 51–91.
Donner, F. M., ‘The Sources of Islamic Conceptions of War’, in J. Kelsay and J. T. Johnson
(eds), Just War and Jihad: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives on War and Peace in
Western and Islamic Traditions, Westport: Greenwood Press, 1991.
Duncan, C. R., ‘Savage Imagery: (Mis)representations of the Forest Tobelo of Indonesia’,
The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, vol. 2, no. 1 (2001), 45–62.
—— ‘The Other Maluku: Chronologies of Conflict in North Maluku’, Indonesia, vol. 80
(October 2005), 53–80.
Editorial, ‘Current Data on the Indonesian Military Elite: January 1 1999–January 31
2001’, Indonesia, vol. 71 (April 2001).
Ellis, S., The Mask of Anarchy: The Destruction of Liberia and the Religious Dimension of
an African Civil War, New York: New York University Press, 1999.
Engineer, A. A., ‘Introduction’, in A. A. Engineer (ed.), The Gujarat Carnage, New Delhi:
Orient Longman, 2003.
Fealy, G., ‘Inside the Laskar Jihad – An Interview with the Leader of a New, Radical and
Militant Sect’, Inside Indonesia, 31 March 2001.
Fearon, J. D., ‘Rationalist Explanations for War’, International Organization, vol. 49, no. 3
(Summer 1995), 379–414.
—— ‘Ethnic War as a Commitment Problem’, paper presented at the 1994 Annual Meeting
234 Bibliography
of the American Political Science Association, New York, 30 August–2 September
1995.
Fearon, J. D. and Laitin, D. D., ‘Explaining Interethnic Cooperation’, American Political
Science Review, vol. 90, no. 4 (December 1996), 715–35.
—— ‘Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity’, International Organiza-
tion, vol. 54, no. 4 (Autumn 2000), 845–77.
—— ‘Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War’, American Political Science Review, vol. 97,
no. 1 (February 2003), 75–90.
Fox, J., ‘Do Religious Institutions Support Violence or the Status Quo?’, Studies in Conflict
and Terrorism, vol. 22 (1999), 119–39.
Gagnon, V. P., ‘Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict: The Case of Serbia’, Inter-
national Security, vol. 19, no. 3 (Winter 1994/95), 130–66.
—— ‘Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict: The Case of Serbia’, in M. E. Brown,
Owen R Cote Jr, Sean M Lynn-Jones and Steven E Miller (eds), Nationalism and Ethnic
Conflict (International Security Readers series), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.
Goss, J. D. and Leinbach, T. R., ‘Development and Differentiation: A Case Study of a
Transmigration Settlement in West Seram’, in D. Mearns and C. Healey (eds),
Remaking Maluku: Social Transformation in Eastern Indonesia, Special Monograph
no. 1, Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Territory University, 1996.
Gurr, T. R., Why Men Rebel, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.
Haire, J., The Character and Theological Struggle of the Church in Halmahera,
1941–1979, Frankfurt: Verlag Peter D. Lang, 1981.
Hanna, W. A. and Alwi, D., Turbulent Times Past in Ternate and Tidore, Banda Naira:
Yayasan Warisan dan Budaya Banda Naira, 1990.
Hasan, N., ‘Faith and Politics: The Rise of the Laskar Jihad in the Era of Transition in Indo-
nesia’, Indonesia, vol. 73 (April 2002), 145–69.
Hasenclever, A. and Rittberger, V., ‘Does Religion Make a Difference? Theoretical
Approaches to the Impact of Faith on Political Conflict’, Millennium, vol. 29, no. 3
(2000), 641–74.
Heck, P. L., ‘Jihad Revisited’, Journal of Religious Ethics, vol. 32, no. 1, 95–128.
Hefner, R. W., ‘Civic Pluralism Denied? The New Media and Jihadi Violence in Indone-
sia’, in D. F. Eickelman and J. W. Anderson (eds), New Media in the Muslim World: The
Emerging Public Sphere, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.
Hill, H. ‘Indonesia: The Strange and Sudden Death of a Tiger Economy’, Oxford Develop-
ment Studies, vol. 28, no. 2 (2000), 117–39.
Horowitz, D., Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.
—— ‘Structure and Strategy in Ethnic Conflict’, paper prepared for the Annual World
Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC, 20–21 April 1998.
—— ‘Group Loyalty and Ethnic Violence’, in Charles Hermann, Harold K. Jacobson and
Anne S. Moffat (eds), Violent Conflict in the Twenty-first Century: Causes, Instruments
and Mitigation, Illinois: American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 1999.
—— The Deadly Ethnic Riot, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.
Human Rights Watch, ‘Indonesia: The Violence in Ambon’, Human Rights Watch Report,
1999.
International Crisis Group, Indonesia’s Maluku Crisis: The Issues, Indonesia Briefing, 19
July 2000.
—— Indonesia: Overcoming Murder and Chaos in Maluku, Asia Report no. 10, 19
December 2000.
International Crisis Group, National Police Reform, Asia Report no. 13, February 2001.
Bibliography 235
International Crisis Group, Communal Violence in Indonesia: Lessons from Kalimantan,
Asia Report no. 19, 27 June 2001.
—— Indonesia: The Search for Peace in Maluku, Asia Report no. 31, 8 February 2002.
—— Al-Qaeda in Southeast Asia: The Case of the ‘Ngruki Network’ in Indonesia, Asia
Briefing no. 20, 8 August 2002.
—— Indonesia Backgrounder: How the Jemaah Islamiyah Terrorist Network Operates,
Asia Report no. 43, 11 December 2002.
Ishige, N., ‘Limau Village and Its Setting’, in N. Ishige (ed.), The Galela of Halmahera: A
Preliminary Survey, Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 1980.
Jati, A. H., Dan Bundapun Menangis (And Mothers Weep), Manado, 2001.
Juergensmeyer, M., Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence,
Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
Kakar, S., The Colors of Violence: Cultural Identities, Religion and Conflict, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1996.
—— ‘The Time of Kali: Violence between Religious Groups in India’, Social Research,
vol. 67, no. 3 (Fall 2000), 877–99.
Kaldor, M., New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Globalized Era, Stanford: Stan-
ford University Press, 1999.
Kalyvas, S. N., ‘The Ontology of “Political Violence”: Action and Identity in Civil Wars’,
Perspectives on Politics, vol. 1, no. 3 (September 2003), 475–94.
—— The Logic of Violence in Civil Wars, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Kaufman, C., ‘Rational Choice and Progress in the Study of Ethnic Conflict: A Review
Essay’, Security Studies, vol. 14, no. 1 (January–March 2005), 178–207.
Kaufman, S. J., ‘An “International” Theory of Interethnic War’, Review of International
Studies, vol. 22, no. 2 (April 1996), 149–72.
—— ‘Spiraling to Ethnic War: Elites, Masses and Moscow in Moldova’s Civil War’, Inter-
national Security, vol. 21, no. 2 (Fall 1996), 108–38.
—— ‘Symbolic Politics or Rational Choice? Testing Theories of Extreme Ethnic
Violence’, International Security, vol. 30, no. 4 (Spring 2006), 45–86.
Keen, D., The Economic Functions of Violence in Civil Wars, Adelphi Paper 320, London:
Oxford University Press, 1998.
Kiem, C. G., Growing up in Indonesia: Youth and Social Change in a Moluccan Town,
Saarbrücken and Fort Lauderdale: Verlag Breitenbach Publishers, 1993.
King, C., ‘The Micropolitics of Social Violence’, World Politics, vol. 56, no. 3 (April
2004), 431–55.
Kordi, M. and Ghufran, H., ‘Kompleksitas Konflik Maluku Utara’ (The Complexity of the
North MaluluConflict), in I. Hasan (ed.), Memikirkan Kembali: Maluku dan Maluku
Utara (Rethinking: Maluku and North Maluku), Makassar: Lembaga Penerbitan
Universitas Hasanuddin (LEPHAS), 2003.
—— ‘Dinamika Masyarakat Makian Dan Konflik Maluku Utara’ (The Dynamism of the
Makian People and the North Maluku Conflict), in I. Hasan (ed.), Memikirkan Kembali:
Maluku dan Maluku Utara (Rethinking: Maluku and North Maluku), Makassar:
Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Hasanuddin (LEPHAS), 2003.
Kristiadi, J., ‘The Armed Forces’, in R. W. Baker, M. H. Soesastro, J. Kristiadi and D. E.
Ramage (eds), Indonesia: The Challenge of Change, Singapore: Institute of Southeast
Asian Studies, 1999.
Lake, D. A., ‘International Relations Theory and Internal Conflict: Insights from the Inter-
stices’, International Studies Review, vol. 5, no. 4 (2003), 81–9.
236 Bibliography
Lake, D. A. and Rothchild, D., ‘Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic
Conflict’, International Security, vol. 21, no. 2 (Fall 1996), 41–75.
—— ‘Spreading Fear: The Genesis of Transnational Ethnic Conflict’, in D. A. Lake and
Rothchild, D. (eds), The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion and
Escalation, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.
Leirissa, R. Z., ‘The Idea of a Fourth Kingdom in Nineteenth Century Tidorese Maluku’, in
E. K. M. Masinambow (ed.), Maluku dan Irian Jaya (special issue of Buletin Leknas,
vol. III, no. 1), Jakarta: Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, 1994.
Leith, J., ‘Resettlement History, Resources and Resistance in North Halmahera’, in S.
Pannell and F. von Benda-Beckmann (eds), Old World Places, New World Problems:
Exploring Issues of Resource Management in Eastern Indonesia, Canberra: Centre for
Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, 1998.
Lucardie, R., ‘Spontaneous and Planned Movement among the Makianese of Eastern Indo-
nesia’, Pacific Viewpoint, vol. 26, no. 1 (April 1985), 63–78.
McAdam, D., Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930–1970,
Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
—— ‘Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency’, American Sociological Review, vol.
48 (December 1983), 735–54.
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, N., Comparative Perspectives on Social Move-
ments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. and Tilly, C., Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2001.
McCarthy, J. D. and Zald, N., ‘Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial
Theory’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 82, no. 6, 1212–41.
McRae, D., ‘Criminal Justice and Communal Conflict: A Case Study of the Trial of
Fabianus Tibo, Dominggus Da Silva, and Marinus Riwu’, Indonesia, vol. 83 (April
2007), 79–117.
Mearns, D., ‘Class, Status and Habitus in Ambon’, in D. Mearns and C. Healey (eds),
Remaking Maluku: Social Transformation in Eastern Indonesia, Special Monograph
no. 1, Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Territory University, 1996.
Meyer, D. S. and Staggenborg, S., ‘Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of
Political Opportunity’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 101, no. 6 (May 1996),
1628–60.
Meyer, P. A. and Hardjodimedjo, M., ‘Maluku: The Modernization of the Spice Islands’, in
H. Hill (ed.), Unity and Diversity: Regional Economic Development in Indonesia since
1970, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Mietzner, M., ‘Godly Men in Green’, Inside Indonesia, vol. 53 (January–March 1998), 8–9.
Moore, Barrington, Jr, Moral Purity and Persecution in History, Princeton: Princeton
University Press, 2000.
Mueller, J., ‘The Banality of Ethnic War’, International Security, vol. 25, no. 1 (Summer
2000), 42–70.
Murphy, D., ‘Al Qaeda’s New Frontier: Indonesia’, Christian Science Monitor, 1 May
2002.
Nanere, J., Halmahera Berdarah (Bloody Halmahera), Ambon: Yayasan Bina Masyarakat
Sejahtera dan Pelestarian Alam (BIMASPELA), 2000.
Olson, M., The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Goods,
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Olzak, S., The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict, Stanford: Stanford University
Press, 1992.
Bibliography 237
O’Rourke, K., Reformasi: The Struggle for Power in Post-Soeharto Indonesia, St
Leonards: Allen & Unwin, 2002.
Petersen, R. D., Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twen-
tieth-Century Eastern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Polletta, F. and Jasper, J. M., ‘Collective Identity and Social Movements’, Annual Review
of Sociology, vol. 27 (2001), 283–305.
Posen, B. R., ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, Survival, vol. 35, no. 1, 27–47.
Regan, A. J., ‘The Bougainville Conflict: Political and Economic Agendas’, in K.
Ballentine and J. Sherman (eds), The Political Economy of Armed Conflict: Beyond
Greed and Grievance, Boulder: Lynne Reiner Publishers, 2003.
Robinson, G., ‘Indonesia: On a New Course?’, in M. Alagappa (ed.), Coercion and Gover-
nance: The Declining Political Role of the Military in Asia, Stanford: Stanford Univer-
sity Press, 2001.
Roe, P., ‘Misperception and Ethnic Conflict: Transylvania’s Societal Security Dilemma’,
Review of International Studies, vol. 28 (2002), 57–74.
Ross, M. L., ‘Oil, Drugs and Diamonds: The Varying Roles of Natural Resources in Civil
Wars’, in K. Ballentine and J. Sherman (eds), The Political Economy of Armed Conflict:
Beyond Greed and Grievance, Boulder: Lynne Reiner Publishers, 2003.
Rule, J. B., ‘Rationality and Non-Rationality in Militant Collective Action’, Sociological
Theory, vol. 7, no. 2 (Autumn 1989), 145–60.
Sambanis, N., ‘Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Liter-
ature on Civil War’, Defence and Peace Economics, vol. 13, no. 3 (2002), 215–43.
Santosa, J. C., ‘Modernization, Utopia and the Rise of Islamic Radicalism in Indonesia’,
unpublished PhD dissertation, Boston University, 1996.
Seul, J. R., ‘Ours Is the Way of God: Religion, Identity, and Intergroup Conflict’, Journal of
Peace Research, vol. 36, no. 5 (1999), 553–69.
Singh, B., ‘The Indonesian Military Business Complex: Origins, Course and Future’,
Working Paper no. 354, Canberra: Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, 2001.
Sitohang, H. H., Hidayaturohman, Nafi, M. D., Ramdhan, M. and Subekti, S., Menuju
Rekonsiliasi Di Halmahera (Towards Reconciliation on Halmahera), Jakarta: Pusat
Pemberdayaan untuk Rekonsiliasi dan Perdamaian, 2003.
Smith, A. D., The Ethnic Origins of Nations, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1986.
Snyder, J. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict, New York:
W. W. Norton & Company, 2000.
—— ‘Anarchy and Culture: Insights from the Anthropology of War’, International Orga-
nization, vol. 56, no. 1 (Winter 2002), 7–45.
Steenbrink, K. ‘Muslim–Christian Relations in the Pancasila State of Indonesia’, Muslim
World, vol. 88, no. 3 (1998), 32–52.
Tambiah, S. J., Leveling Crowds: Ethnonationalist Conflicts and Collective Violence in
South Asia, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
—— ‘The Nation-State in Crisis and the Rise of Ethnonationalism’, in E. N. Wilmsen and
P. McAllister (eds), The Politics of Difference: Ethnic Premises in a World of Power,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
Tarrow, S., Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Mass Politics in
the Modern State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Thomas, H., The Spanish Civil War, rev. edn, New York: The Modern Library, 2001.
Tibi, B., ‘War and Peace in Islam’, in S. H. Hashmi (ed.), Islamic Political Ethics: Civil
Society, Pluralism, and Conflict, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002, pp.
175–93.
238 Bibliography
Tilly, C. From Mobilization to Revolution, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1978.
—— The Politics of Collective Violence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Toft, M. D., The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of
Territory, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003.
Tomagola, T. A., ‘The Bleeding Halmahera of North Moluccas’, Jurnal Studi Indonesia,
vol. 10, no. 2 (2000).
—— ‘Krisis dan Solusi Tragedi Maluku Utara’, Detikcom, 2 February 2000.
Valentino, B. A., Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the Twentieth Century,
Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2004.
van Bruinessen, M., ‘Genealogies of Islamic Radicalism in Post-Suharto Indonesia’, South
East Asian Research, vol. 10, no. 2 (2002), 117–54.
van Dijk, C., Rebellion under the Banner of Islam, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1981.
van Fraassen, C. F., ‘Types of Socio-Political Structure in North-Halmaheran History’, in
E. K. M. Masinambow (ed.), Halmahera dan Raja Ampat: Konsep dan Strategi
Penelitian (Halmahera and Raja Ampat: Research Strategies and Concepts), Jakarta:
LIPI, 1980.
van Klinken, G., ‘The Maluku Wars: Bringing Society Back In’, Indonesia, vol. 71 (April
2001), 1–26.
Varshney, A., Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India, New Haven and
London: Yale University Press, 2002.
Villiers, J., ‘Las Yslas de Esperar en Dios: The Jesuit Mission in Moro 1546–1571’,
Modern Asian Studies, vol. 22, no. 3 (1988), 593–606.
von Benda-Beckmann, F. and Taale, T., ‘Land, Trees, and Houses: Changing (Un)Certain-
ties in Property Relationships on Ambon’, in D. Mearns and C. Healey (eds), Remaking
Maluku: Social Transformation in Eastern Indonesia, Special Monograph no. 1, Centre
for Southeast Asian Studies, Northern Territory University, 1996.
Waever, O., Buzan, B., Kelstrup, M. and Lemaitre, P., Identity, Migration and the New
Security Agenda in Europe, London: Pinter Publishers, 1993.
Weingast, B. R., ‘Constructing Trust: The Political and Economic Roots of Ethnic and
Regional Conflict’, in K. Soltan, E. M. Uslaner and V. Haufler (eds), Institutions and
Social Order, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998.
Wilkinson, S. I., Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Young, K. R., ‘Local and National Influences in the Violence of 1965’, in R.Cribb (ed.),
The Indonesian Killings 1965–1966: Studies from Java and Bali, Centre of Southeast
Asian Studies, Monash University, 1990.
Yurnaldi, ‘Dendam yang tak Berkesudahan’ (Revenge without End), in I. Hasan (ed.),
Memikirkan Kembali: Maluku dan Maluku Utara (Rethinking: Maluku and North
Maluku), Makassar: Lembaga Penerbitan Universitas Hasanuddin (LEPHAS), 2003.
Zald, M. N. and Useem, B., ‘Movement and Countermovement Interaction: Mobilization,
Tactics, and State Involvement’, in M. N. Zald and J. D. McCarthy (eds), Social Move-
ments in an Organizational Society, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1987.
Index
Ambon 31, 36; and Maluku conflict (1999 154–6, 158, 160, 163–76, 183–4,
to 2002) 2, 6–8, 28–9, 31, 43–5, 48, 69, 186–8, 192
77–80, 89, 103, 117, 128, 155, 157–9, GMIH (Gereja Maseh Injili Halmahera) 34,
178; history 32, 34–5, 45–6 52, 77, 84–5, 101, 104–5, 107–8, 117,
Andili, Bahar 6, 46–7, 74, 78–9, 93–4, 119, 121, 123–4, 135, 171, 182, 184
133–5, 138, 142–3, 145 Gorua 101, 107–9, 113–15, 126, 164, 169
Andili, Syamsir 46–7, 78–80, 83, 92–4,
133–5, 142 Horowitz, Donald 8, 17, 21–2, 51, 68, 73,
Armain, Thaib 37, 46–8, 78, 80–1, 83, 91, 180
92–94, 133–135, 142, 152
Assagaf, Abdullah 57–59, 61–62, 137 Imam, Wahda Zainal 80–3, 88, 93–4, 104,
152, 157, 170
Bitjara, Benny 64–6, 70, 105, 110–12, Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) 3, 10,
114, 122, 124, 127–8, 149, 161, 167, 64, 69–71, 80–3, 88–90, 104–6, 114,
170, 173–4, 183, 188, 192–3 117–9, 121–2, 126, 128–9, 135, 146–8,
‘Bloody Sosol’ letter 8–9, 26, 84–6, 91–2, 150–2, 160–3, 167–9, 175–6
94, 181–3
Brass, Paul 9, 12, 21, 72–3, 94, 131–2, Jemaah Islamiyah 158–9
143, 185–6 Jibril, Abu (aka Fikiruddin) 158–9
NHM (Nusa Halmahera Mineral) 36, Tambiah, Stanley 9, 24, 72–3, 186
56–60, 115, 160–2, 187 Ternate 29–31, 36–8, 45, 47, 55, 76–8:
history 30, 32–5, 74; riot – November
Pasukan Jihad 3, 13, 137, 146–76, 186–8, 1999 2, 8–10, 26–7, 71, 88–95, 181–3,
193 192; see also Putih–Kuning conflict
Pasukan Kuning 74, 83–4, 88–9, 93, Tidore 29, 31–2, 47, 76–8; History 30,
135–45, 150–1, 181, 185, 190–1 32–4, 37–8, 48, 74; riot, November
Pemekaran 7, 40, 60, 67; see also Malifut 1999 2, 8–9, 71, 86–8, 91; see also
Popilo 109, 113–15, 126, 152 Putih–Kuning conflict
PP42 (Government Regulation 42/1999) TNI – the Indonesian Military: nationally
59–66, 70, 191 39–42, 44, 47, 155–7; role in North
Putih–Kuning Conflict 11–12, 130–1, Maluku conflict 2–3, 7, 13, 26, 62,
137–47, 184–6 64–6, 71, 79, 82–3, 86, 88–9, 93, 95,
103–4, 106–9, 112–13, 124–5, 134,
RMS (Republik Maluku Selatan) 35, 91, 136, 139, 141, 144–5, 153, 160–6, 168,
103, 109, 153, 171 171–174, 176, 184, 186–9
Tobelo City and Sub-District 3, 12, 31–2,
Security Dilemma 11, 17, 19, 97, 99, 35–8, 48, 58, 67, 84, 96, 99–102;
122–4, 183–4, 189 conflict in December 1999 2–4, 10–11,
Sulawesi, North – refugees in 3, 89, 104, 89, 103–115, 120–9, 183–4, 192
152 Togoliua 101, 107, 110, 113–5, 121, 123,
Syah, Mudaffar – the Sultan of Ternate 6, 126, 152, 169, 174
11–12, 37–8, 46–8, 63–4, 74, 78, 80,
83, 90, 92–5, 106, 127, 130–1, 133–46, Wahid, Abu Bakar 77, 137–8, 142–3,
153, 181, 184–5, 190–1 151–63, 167–8, 170–1, 192–3