Sunteți pe pagina 1din 20

PHILOSOPHY REVIEWER  Question of Causality

 Causality- causes of events and


DOING PHILOSOPHY phenomena, cause-and-effect rela
 Questions regarding origin of things
 Question of Reality
 Purpose- explanation of a thing’s
 Reality- state of existence of things
function or goal, reason for a thing’s
independent of human consciousness
existence
- Includes physical things and
 Ultimate cause- thing’s purpose
things that we cannot easily
 Agency- capacity of man to govern
perceive and comprehend
or control his actions
- “objective and absolute” reality
 Free will- ability to choose among
= everything has a specific nature
possible actions
or character
 Choice- important aspect of any
a. Concrete- ex. Red balloon
discussion on agency and free will
b. Abstract- ex. Many colorful
 Determinism- each event is
balloons
determined or influenced by a
 Metaphysics- questions regarding
specific set of events or factors
reality
 Destiny- predetermined course of
 Ontology- classification of existing
events leading to a specific outcome
things
 Etiology- studies causality
 Teleology- question of purpose
 Question of Certainty
 Certainty- perfect knowledge free
from error or doubt
 Question of Ethics
 Truth- central concept in the question
 Ethics- standards of right and wrong,
of certainty
define human behavior, “greater
 Knowledge- man is able to know
good”, duty, obligation and virtue
- Data that tells it is true
 Ethics and Moral Philosophy- apply
 Rationalism- theory on knowledge,
and analyze these concepts in various
pure reasoning
situations, contexts, and cultures, and
 Priori Knowledge- reasoning without
recommends guidelines that will
experience
govern the decisions and actions of
 Empiricism- theory on knowledge,
people
experience
 Posteriori Knowledge- knowledge
gained from experience
PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRIES
 Skepticism- questions the certainty
of established doctrines or truths,  Systematic Doubt
mind has limits  Skeptical attitude
- All knowledge is uncertain  Argument
 Epistemology- nature and extent of  Engage in discussion and debate on
knowledge their ideas, justify your answer
 Dialectic - V.M. Straka
 Varied and differing ideas and - Whether an object that has had all of
perspectives are analyzed, its components replaced remains
formulating new ideas fundamentally the same object
C. Prisoner’s Dilemma\
METHODS
- Individual’s objectives and
 Socratic Method motivations affect his willingness to
 Series of question cooperate
 Axioms - Merrilll Flood and Melvin Dresher
 Greek: “Axioma”=”true but still - Why 2 completely rational
arguments to prove” individuals might not cooperate,
 Assumptions which are taken for even if it is in best interest to do so
granted D. Allegory of the Cave
 Provide a foundation and direction - Plato
 Basis of discussion and debate - Describe his theory of forms and his
 Occam’s Razor ideas on how our perception affects
 Problem-solving device knowledge
 Among possible explanations, one
with the least assumptions is the DETERMINING TRUTH
most acceptable
 William of Ockham (1287-1347)  Correspondence Theory
- English Franciscan friar and  Something is true if it corresponds to
theologian, influential medieval reality
philosopher and nominalist  Coherence Theory
- Razor= shaving away  Makes sense when placed in a
unnecessary assumptions or certain situation and context
cutting apart two similar  Varied truths from different
conclusions perspectives
 Formal Logic  Proposed by Francis Bradley
 Research and data  Relativism- no absolute truth
 Systematic analysis of the validity of - An idea or principle is only true
arguments and statements within a particular context
 Use of syllogisms or logical  Constructivist Theory
arguments  Knowledge is shaped by social
 Thought experiment and allegory forces and influenced by culture and
 Imagined scenarios history
A. Avicenna’s “floating man”  Founded by Jerome Seymour Bruner
- Relationship between perception and  Consensus Theory
human mind  Knowledge based on agreements
- Avicenna: father of modern math  Something is true if almost everyone
- “there is nothing in the mind which agrees that it is true
was not first in the senses”  Pragmatic Theory
B. Ship of Theseus  Something is true if we can put it
- Concept of an object’s identity into practice, useful in real life
- Or “Seus Paradox”  Verificationism- senses/experiences
CONSIDERATIONS IN ORDER TO with one’s own beliefs or views and
ESTABLISH SOMETHING AS TRUE to reject ideas or views against it
 Framing- focus on certain aspect and
 Arguments
ignoring other aspects
 Reasonable phrases
 Hindsight- tendency to see past
 Fallacies
events as predictable, pattern to
 Faulty reasoning
historical events
 Facts
 Conflict of Interest- person or group
 Establishe truths and easily verified
is connected or has vested interest in
 Opinion
the issue being discussed
 Subjective information or personal
 Cultural Bias- based on one’s
ideas
cultural standards
 Has a tendency to be biased (depends
on the speaker) THE HUMAN PERSON
 Bias
 Man- entire human race
 Personal views
- Humanity, mankind, humankind
FALLACIES  Human- man as species (homo
sapiens sapiens or modern human
 Ad Hominem- latin word, “to the
beings)
man”, “to the person”
 Person- human being granted
- Attacking the person
recognition of certain rights,
 Appeal to Force- threat of force or
protection, and responsibilities
undesirable threat
 Appeal to Emotion- pity or sympathy
 Appeal to the Popular- acceptable
 Biological Perspective
because a lot of people accept it
 man as a part of the natural world
 Appeal to Tradition- acceptable
and a product of evolution
because it has been true for a long
 Modern humans- homo sapiens
time
sapiens, most successfully adapted
 Begging the question- assuming that species on the planet, most
the thing or idea to be proven is true, widespread and dominant species
“circular argument” - Closely related to apes
 Cause-and-effect – cause&effect rela  Human additional traits &
 Fallacy of Composition- what is true capabilities:
for the part is true for the whole a. Planning and intentional action\
 Fallacy of Division- what is true for b. Innovation and creativity
the whole is true for the part c. Communication through language
BIASES and writing
d. Technology
 Correspondence bias or attribution e. Symbolic interaction- art & religion
effect- judge a person’s personality  Culture- man’s most significant
by his or her actions achievement that set apart the
 Confirmation bias- look for and evolution of humanity from other
readily accept information which fits species
 Psychological Perspective  Created in His image and given an
 human behavior and thought immortal spirit
processes in analyzing human nature  Man’s existence brought by
 Mental faculties and capabilities: purposive creative act of God, and
 Psyche- human mind, divided into ultimate destiny is part of a divine
a. conscious mind- governs awareness plan
b. unconscious mind- latent or
repressed (nakatago) emotions,
thoughts, desires  Human Person
 Rationality – state of being  Individual, and all the attributes snd
reasonable characteristics that set him apar from
- Ability to understand experiences other human beings
in order to solve problems or do  Awareness of Self
tasks, and engage in decision  Sentience- ability to feel and
making and judgment experience
 Intelligence- ability to perceive - Ability to perceive the
information, store knowledge, apply surroundings and react to
it in various situations stimulus such as pain
- IQ and EQ  The self as innate- self is an essential
 Introspection- examine one’s own part of the human being, self-
conscious thoughts, feelings, and awareness is natural and innate
mental state, and the capacity for - Religious views- self as
self-reflection synonymous to spirit or soul
 The self as emergent- awareness of
self through interaction with the
 Economic Perspective world and other human beings
 Man’s ability to engage in productive  The self as integrated and
activities in an effort to meet his developing- self is composed of
wants and needs varied elements that change over
 Man as a productive being, primary time
role is to produce and engage in  Identity- distinct personality of an
labor individual
 “economic man”= “homo - Persist through time, may change
economicus” – driven by rationality  Personhood- recognition of a human
and self-interest in his desire to being as a distinct entity- a person
possess wealth  The person as an “autonomous
 Economic forces- greater influence being”- “reasoned free choice”
on the actions of man than society or - Man possesses reason, capacity
culture for reflection, ability to engage in
decision making
 The person as a “unified individual”-
 Theological Perspective inherent capacity to function as a
 Man as God’s creation person
 Special relationship with creator - Human possessed the means to
achieve his or her capabilities
 The person in relation to others
- Human being becomes a person
through interactions with other
human beings
- Pope John Paul II – person is
defined by his or her actions and
experiences, achieves self-
development and fulfillment
May not be recognized as a person:
 People suffering from debilitating
conditions that impair judgment –
lack means to make decisions
 Person suffers extensive brain
damage or a comatose individual –
other people make decisions for them
 Ancient times, slaves were
considered a property
 Women were also not granted
recognition as persons during most
of the ancient period
 African slaves were considered to be
“subhuman” and were considered
equivalent only to “three-fifths of a
person”
1ST SEM FINALS  ARISTOTLE- soul as integrated into
the human body, soul is part of the
PHILOSOPHY AND SPIRITUALITY man’s essence enables him to achive
his ultimate purpose
 Spirit
 Human soul, immortal and non-
corporeal essence of a man
MIND-BODY PROBLEM
 Major monotheistic religions- man is
the only being with soul  questions of how the mental or
 Other religions, Jainism and nonphysical are able to interact with
Hinduisn, non-living things has soul the physical body
 Embodiment
PHYSICALISM
 Central concept in discussing the
nature of human soul  physical processes determine the
 Discussions on the nature of human state of the mind
consciousness
IDEALISM
 Consciousness has both physical and
non-physical nature  mental processes and thoughts are
 Embodied cognition the only reality
 man is able to perceive and
MONISM
experience reality through his
physical body/ senses  human being is composed of
 Enactivism elements that are neither physical nor
 Cognition arises through interaction mental
between organism & its environment
DUALISM
 distinctiveness of the physical and
 Christian doctrine:spirit is created by mental nature of man
God
 Spirit continues to persist in afterlife AVICENNA
 Spirit essential element for the  argued that self-awareness and
salvation of mankind consciousness exists even if the body
 Departed spirits will be raised from is deprived of its senses
the dead during end times and shall
receive judgment of God RENE DESCARTES
 proposed that the mind and body
exist as two separate entities which
NATURE OF SPIRIT interact with one another
 PLATO: human mind is immortal & ST. THOMAS AQUINAS
persists after the death of the body
human spirit or soul 3 parts:  soul is the “first actuality” of the
 Logos- mind or reason body
 Thymos- emotion  for there to be a body, there should
 Eros- desire be first a soul
 soul has substance but no physical or THEISM
concrete form, exists w/o body
 belief in the existence of a God or
ST. AUGUSTINE several deities
 Monotheism- single God
 soul the driving force which governs
the body and defines the human GOD
person
 Supreme being which governs all
TRICHOTOMIC VIEW existence, and the center of faith and
devotion of a religion
 man is composed of the body, soul
 Omniscience- God is all-knowing
and spirit
 Omnipotence- God is all-powerful
 soul- component which gives man
 Omnipresence- God is perfectly
life and will
good, just, and all-loving
 spirit- enables man to establish
 Divine Simplicity- all attributes are
connection with God
integrated and embodied of Him
DICHOTOMIC VIEW - Not just good, He is goodness
itself
 no distinction between spirit and soul  Eternal- timeless no beginning&end
 man composed of body and spirit
 Revealed Theology
 study of God through the analysis of
sacred texts
PSYCHOSOMATIC UNITY
 Natural Theology
 man is of a single or unitary  substantiate existence of God
constitution  Ontological Argument
 body and spirit are inseparable and  Since man is a rational being, able
integrated conceive the notion of a Supreme
being, such Supreme being exists
 Teleological Argument
 human person is the union of the  Focuses on the purpose of God
body and soul would play in the universe
 man’s soul enables him to know and  Supreme being is necessary for the
love God, and grant him the dignity continued existence of an orderly but
of a person complex universe
 through the soul man is able to share  Cosmological Argument
in God’s life, relationship with God  Nature of existence and the universe
that defines his existence  Recognizes the existence of God as
an explanation of how things came to
THEOLOGY
being in a reality
 study of God and other religious  Kalam Cosmological Argument
concepts  Everything that has a beginning
 concept of divine, existence of God has a cause
 The universe has a beginning
 Therefore, universe has a cause
 God is the cause that brought IMMANENCE
about the beginning of the
 God manifesting Himself as a unique
universe
identity
 Moral Argument
 Other religions: take human form
 Man’s ethical nature is brought about
 Christian: Jesus Christ then Holy
the existence of God
Spirit
 God is the representation of the
“greatest good”, all standards of TRANSCENDENCE
goodness is based
 God as existing outside the material
 By William Sorley
world (heaven), presence is beyond
ST. THOMAS AQUINAS physical laws and even human
knowledge and understanding
 God as the “prime mover”, “first
 Panentheistic view- God is both
cause of existence”, “source of
beyond and within universe
being” of reality and universe
 Pantheistic view- God is an all-
GOTTFRIED LEIBNIZ encompassing presence in the
universe, no distinct presence
 Existence of God on the “principle of  Pandeistic view- God was a distinct
sufficient reason” entity but lost this state when He
 All facts and events must have an transformed Himself into the
explanation universe
 Existence of the universe must have  Transcendental experiences- prayer,
an explanation and the sufficient meditation, visions
explanation is the existence of God
THEISM
IMMANUEL KANT
 Existence of God or deities
 Human transcendence is based on
AGNOTICISM
rationality
 Metaphysical concepts such as God  Humans are able to comprehend
inherently unknowable certain abstract concepts that have
no equivalent physical object or
ATHEISM sesnsory experience
 Rejection or nonbelief in the JEAN-PAUL SARTRE
existence of God or any deity
 Person’s ability to comprehend and
relate objects and beings outside of
 Redemptive Salvation his own self as an indication of
 Divine Providence- blessings, transcendence
miracles, divine inspiration, and  Ability of person to relate to people,
revelation things, and experiences in
meaningful manner
MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) 2014 study
ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
 Branch of philosophy concerned
 Human activities have contributed to
with natural environment and
the rise of global temperatures
humanity’s place within it
through the release of greenhouse
ANTHROPOCENTRISM gases into the atmosphere

 Human are the central and most ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS


significant species on the planet
 Emerged in the 1970s
 Primary cause that drives changes in
 Advocated human responsibility and
the environment
action with regard to environmental
DEEP ECOLOGY issues
1. All nonhuman (animals, natural
 Natural world as being maintained resources) have intrinsic value and
by the interrelationship among living should be preserved
organisms and that every living thing 2. Preservation of the environment is
on the planet is dependent on each beneficial for humasn
other for survival 3. Man has responsibility to safeguard
 Human interference as significant the planet as it has been entrusted to
threat to the natural world him by God
GAIA HYPOTHESIS SOCIAL ECOLOGY
 By James Lovelock  Ecological and ethical approach in
 Non-organic elements play a analyzing society, sees relationship
significant role in maintaining between social problems and
balance in the environment as they environmental problems
interact with living organisms to  Society should implement changes to
regulate various systems address environmental issues
Theological Views CLIMATE ETHICS & CLIMATE
 Gen 1:26-28 – mankind is intended JUSTICE
to live in harmony with all creation  Fair distribution of environmental
- God created man and granted benefits, also burden of meeting
him dominion over all creatures environmental challenges
and tasked him to subdue the
earth ENVIRONMENTAL AESTHETICS
 Pope John Paul II- man’s lordship
 Greek word “Aesthesis”= perception
over nature as a “ministerial act”, a
of the senses
continuation of the work of the
 Concepts of beauty in nature but has
Creator, must be done with wisdom
recently been increasingly influenced
and love
by environmental concerns
ENVIRONMENTALISM LIBERALISM
 Important issue in international  Preservation of individual rights and
politics as governments and stresses the role of the government in
international organizations have protecting these civil liberties
devoted efforts to discuss
LIBERTARIANISM
environmental issues and
formulate plans to address them  Individual, not the government, is the
best judge in upholding and
KYOTO PROTOCOL 1997
exercising rights.
 Various nations committed to
SOCIALISM
reduce greenhouse gas
emisssions  Freedom to acquire economic
resources and the ability to work and
EARTH DAY
act according to one’s desires
 First instituted in 1970  Maximizing one’s potential
 Global effort to raise awareness
NATURAL RIGHTS
of environmental issues and
inspire action  Innate in the person, universal and
inalienable
FREEDOM
 Such as the right to life
 Or “Liberty” is a social and political
LEGAL RIGHTS
concept which has great significance
in how people participate in society  Rights that are based on society’s
 In political and social context is the customs and laws, and are enacted by
freedom of an individual from legislation and enforced by a govt
oppression, compulsion, or coercion
from other persons THEOLOGICAL VIEWS- freedom from sin
 “Age of Enlightenment”- early man and living a life of righteousness, living in
accordance with the will of God
existed in a “natural state” and had
absolute freedom HUMAN AGENCY
 Establishment of societies- “social
contract”  Capacity of a person to act and exert
control over his or her behavior
POLITICAL FREEDOM:
FREE WILL
 Positive Liberty- person taking
control of his or her own life and  Capacity to choose from alternative
fulfilling one’s potential courses of action or decision
 Negative Liberty- freedom from FREE ACTION
external restraint, barriers, and other
interferences from other people  Freedom to perform an action
without any obstacle or hindrances
FACULTIES MODEL CONTROL AND REGULATION
 Free will as the use of mental  Necessary elements in the
faculties responsible exercises of freedom
 Human action is based on rationality
THE PERSON AND OTHERS
and sound judgment
EXISTENTIALISM & PHENOMENOLOGY
HIERARCHICAL MODEL
 Major philosophical branches that
 Free will is based on human wants
devote much discussion on the
and desires
concept of interpersonal relations
 When he or she identifies one desire
as acceptable and decides to act on it SELF
THE REASONS-RESPONSIVE VIEW  Egocentric perspective that defines
how he or she perceives and relates
 Man has free will because he or she
to reality
is able to entertain reasons not to
enact a certain decision and act upon OTHER
them when the need arises
 Objects outside of personal
 Planning, crossing out one
experience, other individuals apart
unattainable decision
from the self
CONSTRAINTS ON FREE ACTION
INTERSUBJECTIVITY
 Prohibitions
 Shared awareness and understanding
 Laws
among persons
 Social controls imposed by society  Shared or common knowledge and
 Person with disability or sickness consensus, shared emotions such as
 Weather, accidents, poverty grief, joy, love
DETERMINISM Various levels of self-other interactions
 Every event in the world is brought 1.simple awareness of the existence of other
about by underlying causes or
factors  We are aware that they are other
beings unique from us, they exist
MARXIST PHILOSOPHY outside of our own awareness or
 Society imposes certain controls on perception
people, and that a person’s social 2.awareness of the self as being seen by
group largely influences how he or others
she thinks or acts
 Man is essentially constrained by  You are immediately aware of this
society person’s action as an other

MORAL RESPONSIBILITY 3.awareness of the self in the other

 Person’s status of deserving praise  The way we act with other people is
and reward, or blame and often influenced by our ideas of how
punishment for an action these people see us
SEEMING ETHICS OF CARE
 Martin Buber  Emphasizes the moral dimension of
 Individual presents himself or herself relationships and interactions
in a certain way when dealing with  To see needs of other people, most
others especially the vulnerable
 Taking on roles or characters when
dealing with certain people or when  Human person is regarded by
in certain situations Philosophy as a “being-with-others”
 Seeking and maintaining meaningful
DIALOGUE
and harmonious relationships with
 Genuine relationship established others is necessary for personal
among individuals development

EXISTENTIALISTS: consider human CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE


relationships as a defining influence on
 Human relations in the context of
human life
community
CONSTRUCTIVIST THEORY OF  Strongest bonds are those that
KNOWLEDGE involve parents and their children,
friends, and the bond between man
 Shape knowledge and truth within a and wife
certain society  Even greater still is the relationship
PHENOMENOLOGISTS: shared between God and man which is
experience between persons can shape the defined as a fellowship & covenant
perception of reality  Old Testament- Creation, Noah’s
salvation from the Great Flood,
ALIENATION Abraham’s journey to the Promised
 Individual ceases to view other as Land, deliverance of the Israelites
distinct and authentic person,and from Egypt, Ten Commandments,
considers him or her as a mere object God’s Promise to Davi
 Karl Marx: alienation gives rise to  New Testament- Jesus Christ, death
exploitation of people and resurrection, importance of
fellowship among men
EMPATHY - “love your neighbor as yourself”
 Edith Stein (Mark 12:31)
 Awareness that the other is a person - “do unto others what you would
with thoughts and feelings have them do unto you”
 Edmund Husserl: put oneself ”in the (Matthew 7:12)
place where the other is”  Compels us to be sympathetic most
especially to the least of our breathen
AVAILABILITY
 Gabriel Marcel
 Willingness of a person to be present
and be at the disposal of another
MAN AND SOCIETY  Society is therefore men seek to
control their natural tendencies and
SOCIETY
impose order
 Large, independent, and organized  “Social contract” – agreement
group of people living in the same where individual sacrifices some of
territory and sharing a common their wants and submit to a higher
culture and heritage authority to meet the needs of many
 Hunting-and-gathering societies JOHN LOCKE
 Lifestyle dependent on resources
readily available from their  Man in natural state as more
surroundings, “primitive” cooperative and reasonable
 Agricultural societies  Society is formed through the
 Agricultural activities, farming, consent of the individuals
fishing, livestock-raising  “Consent of the governed” –
 Industrial societies covenant among individuals to
 Mechanized production and the cooperate and share the burden of
exchange of goods and services upholding the welfare of society
 Modern societies JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU
 Technologically-advanced societies
characterized by industry, mass  “General will” – people are the ones
production, and advanced who organized society & established
communication & transportation an authority & government,
 Virtual society government is able to impose its will
 Not confined by territory and are on people and the best judge of what
composed of individuals coming is most beneficial for society
from various social backgrounds JOHN RAWLS
SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY  Redefines social contract and
 Studying society and its influences explained that human beings
on the human person approach social cooperation in a
rational manner in order to meet their
FORMATION OF SOCIETIES individual self-interests
 Humans are considered to have a  Introduced new version of natural
natural tendency to cooperate and state “original position” to explain
organize, and society is a natural social formation, “veil of ignorance”
outcome of this human tendency to no knowledge of one’s own
socialize characteristics
 Humans as living in a so-called DAVID GAUTHIER
“natural state” removed fromo
modernity and civilization  “self-interest” a significant factor in
building and maintaining societies
THOMAS HOBBES
SOCIALIZATION
 Man in natural state is governed by
his desires that leads into conflict  Individual learns the prevailing
behaviors, attitudes,, and values
within his or her society, a person FILIPINO SOCIETY
adopts a set of ideals and behavior
 Very close relationship among
considered appropriate within his or
family members and members of
her society
extended family
 Individuals retain their own unique
 Traditions: pakikisama,
traits, society directly and indirectly
pakikipagkapwa-tao, utang-na-loob,
influences certain aspects of
damayan, bayanihan
individual behavior
 Religion has an important role=
STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT family-centered and conservative
(fiesta, Christmas, Holy Week)
 Stanford University 1971
 24 male volunteers with sound HAPPINESS
mental state and had no history of
2 DEFINITIONS:
violence participate in a simulated
1. Can be interpreted as a state of mind
prison as prison guards and prisoners
a. in a good mood
 Guards began to implement harsh
b. Can still maintain his or her
and abusive measures against the
happiness even if he or she is
prisoners, the prisoners then began to
experiencing difficulties in life
rebel so the researchers had to stop
2. Evaluation of one’s experiences in life
SOCIAL ROLES
a. satisfying life
 Set of expected behaviors that must
be performed by a person EUDAIMONIA (good spirit)
SOCIAL GROUP  Person’s state of well-being or
happinesss, term used by Ancient
 People in a social group tend to
Greeks
behave a certain way, and continuous
interactions within their group PLATO
reinforce such behavior
 Equates happiness with living a
NORMATIVE DEMOCRATIC THEORY moral life, practicing virtues,
fulfilling personal duties, and
 Perspective which considers a
controlling one’s desires
democratic society as morally
desirable ARISTOTLE
 Happiness is the primary reason for
human action,
Western Society- more individualistic &
 One becomes happy through the
secular, being assertive and direct
practice of virtues and the
Asian Societies- more rigid and formal, accumulation of achievements
value respect, familial relations, social status
EPICUREANS
SMOOTH INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
 Happiness means a life of peace that
 Community relations are defined by is free from fear and discomfort
the desire to establish and maintain
ST. AUGUSTINE & ST. THOMAS AQUINAS 3 DISTINCT ELEMENTS OF HAPPINESS
 Happiness as a union with God 1.Contentment- satisfaction with one’s life
 Achieving unity with the Divine, and
man’s eventual union with God is the 2.Welfare- satisfaction of a person’s wants
epitome of happiness and desires plus basic needs
3. Dignity- ability to control and define
one’s own destiny, and the freedom to live a
GREATEST HAPPINESS PRINCIPLE life of one’s choosing
 Utilitarianism proposes a view on
happiness based on this
 Person’s actions are considered PSYCHOLOGISTS
moral or desirable when they  Happiness as a balance between a
produce the greatest happiness for person’s emotions, moods,& feelings
other people  Combination of physical, emotional,
WHOLE LIFE SATISFACTION psychological happiness

 Person is able to evaluate his or her ECONOMISTS


life experiences and determine his or  Use socioeconomic data to define
her level of satisfaction with how he happiness and well-being in
or she has lived life numerical terms, giving rise to
WLADYSLAW TATARKIEWICZ various statistics such as the Gross
National Happiness Index & Gross
 Happiness as “satisfaction with one’s National Well-Being Index
life as a whole”  Factors such as: sustainable
development, promotion of cultural
RICHARD BRANDT
values, preservation of the
 Person’s happiness based on a total environment, good governance
life pattern- a person should not only  2011, UN recognized happiness as “a
be satisfied with thhe life he or she fundamental human goal and
has lived, but must also feel constant universal aspiration”
joy and enthusiasm in life  World Happiness report since 2012
WAYNE SUMNER ETHICS
 Happiness in two ways:  Significant role in discussing
1. Cognitive perspective- one must able happiness &the means to achieve it
to look back at past experiences and
ARISTOTLE
have positive evaluation of his or her
condition  Set worthwhile goals, determine role
2. Emotional or affective side- in society
happiness is brought about by a  Devote himself or herself to public
sense of well being in having lived a service and contribute to the good of
life that is enriching and rewarding society
 Goal that will lead to true happiness
is the pursuit of knowledge
EPICUREANS WELTSCHMERZ
 Happiness is possible if one enjoys  Man’s realization that the
the simple pleasures of life and world can never live up to the
commits to a life of virtue ideal “perfect world” leading
to feelings of sadness or
ST. AUGUSTINE
apathy
 Happiness can be found in the
ANGST
afterlife when the spirit reunites with
God  Fear and anxiety
 Relate this feeling to
JEREMY BENTHAM
“existential dread”- crisis
 Happiness is achieved through wise brought when a person begins
decision-making to question his or her purpose
and reason for being
IMMANUEL KANT
ENNUI
 Achieving happiness is impossible
because of the ever-changing nature  Feeling of weariness and discontent
of man’s desires. brought by a lack of interest or
intense boredom with the world
TWO MAJOR PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWS
SUFFERING
1. Suffering as an undesirable human
 Mild, moderate, severe condition, and that humans naturally
 Experience of unpleasantness, seek pleasure and avoid pain
discomfort, and pain
 Threats to human existence or the ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER
lack of pleasure or happiness
“proposed a view of world controlled by
 Can also be caused by conflict
chaotic forces that bring about human
between “perfect world” and actual
suffering”
state of world leading to anxiety,
uncertainty and dread  German Philosopher, best known for
 Physical Suffering his 1818 work the “World as Will &
 Physical sensations, Representation”
discomfort, hunger, distress,  Developed an atheistic metaphysical
pain caused by injury, disease & ethical system that has been
and the lack of basic needs described as an exemplary
 Mental Suffering manifestation of philosophical
 Emotional and mental states pessimism
depression, anxiety, fear,  “pessimistic view” – human
loneliness and grief caused existence is characterized by
by sudden changes in suffering caused by man’s inability
lifestyle, loss of employment, to meet his unlimited wants&desires
stressful situations, and grief
caused by death of loved one 2. Suffering is necessary to human
existence. Suffering is essential
because it defines human existence,  STOICS- one must face difficulties
to grow, for u to become stronger in life with fortitude and patience
 NIETZSCHE- human suffering
FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE
emphasize individual’s roles in
“suffering is inevitable, and that man is making sense of adversity, a person
meant to suffer” should face his or her suffering and
take responsibility for it
 German Philosopher whose work has
exerted a profound influence on HUMANITARIANISM
Western Philosophy and Modern
 Purpose of a person’s existence is to
Intellectual history
make other people happy
 Certain forms of suffering can be
beneficial and can result in personal SOCIAL SUPPORT/GROUPS
growth and development, test of a
 Family
person’s worth
 Peer group
GEORGE SEFLER  Religious groups
 Suffering as one of many interrelated
elements that define the meaning of
experiences throughout life
 Suffering and happiness go hand-in-
hand in defining a person’s views on
his life’s experiences
 Balance between positive and
negative experiences will result in a
well-adjusted, functional person
THEODICY
 Philosophical branch which tries to
reconcile the existence of a
benevolent, all-good God with the
reality of suffering in the world
COPING
 Means that a person employs in
dealing with difficult life situations,
and involves a conscious effort to
solve personal and interpersonal
problems
 EPICUREANS- suffering can be
avoided by seeking only the
pleasurable things in life and
avoiding those that cause harm or
pain
DEATH DUALIST PERSPECTIVE
 End of all biological functions that  Mind and spirit, being incorporeal,
sustain a living organism persists after the body’s demise, his
 Causes: aging, injury, fatal injury spirit endures after death
 “brain death” – ceasing of all brain
AFTERLIFE
functions, clinically dead
 Natural occurrence  Believed that the spirit of the dead
survives and continues to persist
AGING OR SENESCENCE
NEAR DEATH EXPERIENCE
 gradual decline of the human body
 decline of the senses- sight and  People who were close to death
hearing, gradual loss of vitality and reported experiences of an afterlife
mobility, mental decline, increased  “out-of-body experience”- person
frailty and susceptibility to injury or views his or her body or the events
disease surrounding his or her apparent death
from a distance
REINCARNATION
ETERNAL OBLIVION
 belief that a person’s spirit begins a
new life in another body  Opposite view to the belief in
afterlife
ETERNAL OBLIVION
 Belief that death totally extinguishes
 belief that the person’s the consciousness of the person
consciousness is completely erased  Denies the existence of a
upon death, wala ng senses but still noncorporeal, immortal aspect in
has unconscious mind man, and considers death as the end
*first & last sense- hearing of a person’s existence
CEREMONIES & COMMEMORATION MORTALITY SALIENCE
 All Souls Day  Man’s awareness of the inevitability
 Chinese Ghost Festival of death
 Mexican Day of the Dead MARTIN HEIDEGGER
PHILIPPINE SOCIETY (German Philosopher)
 Wake- opportunity to come together  He believes that man is being
in memory of the deceased oriented towards death (being-
 Abuloy- voluntary contributions for toward-death)
the family of the deceased  Human existence is fundamentally
 Funeral procession- important defined by the awareness of one’s
practice, adopt a respectful and impending death
somber attitude as the procession  Fulfillment of existence, acceptance
passes of one’s morality ->sense of freedom
 “every man is a born men and dies as
a single one”
LUDWIG JOSEPH JOHAN WITTGENSTEIN from dust and in death, he returns to
dust (General 3:19)
(Austrian)
 Man’s Spirituality- defines his
 Death is a phenomenon that is existence as it is the person’s
outside of human experience, we do ultimate destiny to live on in eternity
not live to experience death as a spirit united with God
 “where one cannot speak, thereof
THEISTIC VIEW
one must be silent”
 Meaning of life as a part of a larger
KARL JASPERS
plan devised by God
(German-Swiss Psychiatrist & Philosopher)
GRIEF
 Death as the most significant “limit
 Natural reaction to death and dying
situation”
 Involves multitude of emotions such
 one should have the capacity to alter
as sadness, anxiety, anger, and guilt
his or her perspectives and ideas to
 May also be brought by forms of loss
be able to live with the fact that he or
she is destined to die BEREAVEMENT
 “what is meaningful cannot in fact be
isolated”  State of loss brought by death

ERIK ERIKSON MOURNING

(Psychologist)  Process by which persons deal with


death
 Defines death as an important aspect
in the development of man FIVE STAGES OF GRIEF
 “Doubt is the brother of shame” (Elisabeth Kubler-Ross)
EGO INTEGRITY VS DESPAIR  DENIAL- dying person initially
 Last stage of our lives, expresses disbelief
 Ego Integrity- a person achieving - often refuse to believe the news
his or her life’s purpose or having at first
come to terms with his or her life  ANGER- person expresses
 Despair- person views his or her life frustration with his or her situation,
as a failure or his or her life - their situation is “unfair” often
experiences as generally thinking that the deceased did not
unsatisfactory deserve such fate
 Wisdom- view of life undaunted by  BARGAINING- dying person is
death willing to do anything to survive and
to prolong his or he life,
CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE - things will improve if they
 Death in the context of man’s behave in a certain way or make
spiritual nature changes in their lives
 Death entails destruction of the  DEPRESSION- intense sadness and
physical body, as man is created exhibits disinterest in life and its
normal routines,
- Person may become withdrawn,
sullen and express hopelessness
- Experience certain emotional or
mental problems
 ACCEPTANCE- last emotional
stage, person finally comes to terms
with his or her impending death and
has embraced his or her morality
- calm & emotionally stable,
source of emotional support for
their grieving family members
FOUR TRAJECTORIES OF GRIEF
(George Bonnano)
 RESILIENCE- emotionally stable
despite the loss, continue with
normal activities
- Most ideal emotional course
when experiencing grief
 RECOVERY- person experiences a
period of grief, eventually gives way
to recovery and a return to normalcy
 CHRONIC DEPRESSION-
continues long after the death or
traumatic experience has passed,
- may persist for several years
often needs counseling & support
*Acute Depression- sudden
 DELAYED GRIEF- well-adjusted
but experiences feelings of grief,
anxiety, and distress at a later time

S-ar putea să vă placă și