Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region X
Division of Lanao del Norte
Baloi West District
MAMAANUN PRIMARY SCHOOL

ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2016-2017 to 2018 – 2019

I. INTRODUCTION

A School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a roadmap that lays down specific

interventions that a school, with the help of the community and other stakeholders,

undertakes within a period of three (3) consecutive school years. It aims to improve the

three key result areas in basic education: access, quality, and governance. It is

evidence-based, results-based, and child or learner-centered. The SIP is central in

School-Based Management (SBM) and is prepared by the School-Community Planning

Team (SPT). It is the basis for the school’s Annual Implementation Plan.

Pursuant to D.O. 44, s. 2015, schools shall begin a new SIP cycle using the

enhanced planning process in these guidelines by January 2016. Definitely, Mamaanun

PS enhanced its School Improvement Plan to reach the goal of providing access to

quality education. In this way, enhanced SIP makes the delivery of education services

to the learners are responsive, efficient, and effective.

Mamaanun Primary School (MPS) enrolment from 2012-13 is 142, 2013-14 is

135, 2014-15 is 123, 2015-16 is 121, and 2016-17 is 112. It has a decreasing enrolment

because most of the families went out of the Barangay to look for greener pasture. The

Barangay also has two more primary schools, Patpangkat PS and Bubong Paco PS,

1
which other families choose to enroll their child. There is also another nearby complete

elementary school from the next Barangay which is Balut ES. This is a big challenge to

MPS that school head and teachers have to face. The school should manifest teacher’s

excellent performance in school to attract parents in choosing us during enrolment.

Because of the new curriculum implemented by DepEd, K12 textbooks or LM’s in

MPS are insufficient. Only the Grade 2 class has K12 LM’s which is shared by 2

learners per LM. Another class, the Grade 4 has only 1 LM per learning area and this

was provided to the teacher during Mass Training of Teachers as their reference and no

LM’s received for learners.

When it comes to school’s awards and recognition, the school has not yet

received any award or recognition from any level. The school is a clustered school

before of Balut ES. Most of the participation in any competition is coming from Balut ES.

Now that MPS has new designated SIC, the school will try to compete with other

schools of Baloi West in any District Competition.

Lastly, among the school’s projects, the Flag Pole and Washing Facility were

done 100% by previous school head. The school’s waiting shade needs repair and the

school site fence is not yet finished. As of now, one of the priorities of the SIC is to

repair the waiting shade and to fence school site completely.

Hopefully, with the cooperation of the teachers and the community, quality

teaching of teachers, more support from stakeholders, and more effective and efficient

leadership of the school head, these challenges can be addressed.

2
II. VISION, MISSION, CORE VALUES

The DepEd Vision

We dream of Filipinos

who passionately love their country

and whose values and competencies

enable them to realize their full potential

and contribute meaningfully to building the nation.

As a learner-centered public institution,

the Department of Education

continuously improves itself

to better serve its stakeholders.

The DepEd Mission

To protect and promote the right of every Filipino to quality, equitable,

culture-based, and complete basic education where:

 S TU D E N TS learn in a child-friendly, gender-sensitive, safe, and

motivating environment.

 T E A C H E R S facilitate learning and constantly nurture every learner.

 A D MI N I S TR A T O R S AND STAFF, as stewards of the institution, ensure

an enabling and supportive environment for effective learning to

happen.

 F A MI L Y , C O M M UNI T Y , AND O THE R S TA K E H OL D E RS are actively

engaged and share responsibility for developing life-long learners.

3
 Our Core Values

M AK A -D I Y OS

M AK A - T AO

M AK AK AL I K AS AN

M AK AB AN S

III. SCHOOL SITUATION

ACCESS

ENROLMENT

150 126 122

112
100 Male
65 61 61 61 57 55 Female
50
Total

0
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

The graph shows enrolment of the school for the past three years. In
2014-15, male are 65 while female are 61 with a total of 126. In 2015-16, male
are 61 while female are 61 with a total of 122. Lastly, 2016-17 male enrollees are
57 while female enrollees are 55 with a total of 112.

DROPOUT RATE

1
0.8
0.6 Male
0.4 Female
0.2 Total
0
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

The graph shows the dropout rate of the school for the past three years
which is zero.

4
INTAKE RATE

5 y.o.
96% 95%
95%
94%
93% 92% 5 y.o.
92%
91%
90%
Male Female

The graph shows the intake rate of the school which is 95% of the male
population aged 5 years old of the community are enrolled in Kinder while 92%
are female.

RETENTION RATE

120%
100%
100%
100% 100%
100%
100% 100%
100%
100% 100%
100%
100% 100%
100%
100%
100%
80%
Male
60%
Female
40%
Total
20%
0%
Kinder Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4

The graph shows the retention rate of the school by grade level which
100% of the learners retained in school for the next school year.

PARTICIPATION RATE

96% 95%
95%
94% 93%
93% 92% 92%
92% 91% 91% 91% Male
91% 90% 90% 90%
90% Female
89%
88%
87%
5 y.o. 6 y.o. 7 y.o. 8 y.o. 9 y.o.

5
 The graph shows the participation rate of the school by age from 5 - 9
years old. For aged 5, 95% are male while 92% are female; 93% are male while
91% are female for aged 6; 92% are male while 90% are female for aged 7; 91%
are male while 90% are female for aged 8; 91% are male while 90% are female
for aged 9.

QUALITY

NAT 3 (2013, 2014)

80 71.09
66 63.6 60 59.2 58.96 57.26
60 52.34 53.6 53.13 51.82
43.2 44.58
36.27
40 2013

20 2014

0
Reading Reading English Filipino Science Mathematics Overall
English Filipino Grammar Grammar

The graph shows the NAT 3 results of the school for 2013 and 2014. The
overall MPS result in 2013 is 51.82 while 57.26 in 2014. There is an increase of
5.44 but still failed to achieve the mastery level which is 75%.
LAPG (2015)

120
100
92.8694.86 94 94.44
100 82.86 84 86 83.33 79.2682.58
77 80 76.8
74.4 77.14 80.56
75.43 78
80 65.28 69.05 67.91
56
60 44.67
Meranaw
40
20 English
0 Tagalog

The graph shows the LAPG 3 result in 2015 which the overall MPS in
Meranaw is 79.26, 67.91 in English, and 82.58 in Tagalog. Among the three,
English skills did not meet the expected mastery level of 75%.

6
LITERACY

Phil IRI PreTest

60
50
50
40 38 38
40
28 Frustration
27
30 22 24 25
20 21 Instructional
20 15
Independent
10
0
Filipino Oral Filipino Silent English Oral English Silent

The graph shows the PreTest result in Phil-IRI which the Independent
Readers in Filipino Oral is 27, Filipino Silent is 22, English Oral is 21, and English
Silent is 25; Instructional Readers in Filipino Oral is 40, Filipino Silent is 50,
English Oral is 28, and English Silent is 24; and Frustration Readers in Filipino
Oral is 20, Filipino Silent is 15, English Oral is 38, and English Silent is 38.

Phil IRI PostTest

60
49
50
42 42
38
40 35 35 37
Frustration
30 25
Instructional
20 13 13
10 Independent
10 7

0
Filipino Oral Filipino Silent English Oral English Silent

The graph shows the PostTest result in Phil-IRI which the Independent
Readers in Filipino Oral is 35, Filipino Silent is 42, English Oral is 37, and English
Silent is 49; Instructional Readers in Filipino Oral is 42, Filipino Silent is 38,
English Oral is 35, and English Silent is 25; and Frustration Readers in Filipino
Oral is 10, Filipino Silent is 7, English Oral is 13, and English Silent is 13.

7
 PROMOTION

120%
100%
100%
100% 100%
100%
100% 100%
100%
100% 100%
100%
100% 100%
100%
100%
100%
80%
2013-14
60%
2014-15
40%
2015-16
20%
0%
Kinder Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4

The graph shows the promotion rate of the school by grade which the
learners in each grade is 100% promoted to the next grade level at the end of the
school year.

GOVERNANCE

NUTRITIONAL STATUS

100 92

80

60 49
43 Male
40 Female
20
Total
20 8 12
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Severely Wasted Normal Overweight Obese
Wasted

The graph shows the Nutritional Status of the school which learners under
normal status is 49 male and 43 female with a total of 92, while learners under
wasted level is 8 male and 12 female with a total of 20. No learners under
severely wasted, overweight, and obese status.

SBM

Level 1 Developing

8
 The SBM level of the school is developing. As of SY 2015-16, the SBM
documents of the school has not yet assessed and validated by the Division
Validating Team.

INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

Grade Level CG TG
Kinder Complete Complete
Grade 1 Incomplete Incomplete
Grade 2 Incomplete Incomplete
Grade 3 Incomplete Incomplete
Grade 4 Complete Complete

The table shows the available IMs of the school by grade level which
Kinder and Grade 4 has complete CGs and TGs while Grade 1, 2, and 3 are
incomplete in CGs and TGs.

TEXTBOOKS/LEARNERS’ MATERIALS

Name of K12 Textbooks No. of Pieces

MTB – MLE 2 10
Filipino 2 10
Mathematics 2 10
EsP 2 10
Filipino 4 1
English 4 1
Mathematics 4 1
Science 4 1
Araling Panlipunan 4 1
MAPEH 4 1
EsP 4 1
EPP 4 1

The table shows the Textbooks/LMs available in the school which MTB –
MLE, Filipino, Math, and EsP in Grade 2 has 10 each while only one LM in each
learning area in Grade 4.

9
STAKEHOLDERS’ PARTICIPATION

Stakeholders' Attendance
75% 75%
80%
55% 50%
60% 45%
40%
20%
0% Stakeholders' Attendance

The graph shows the stakeholders’ attendance in curricular activities

which is 55%, 45% in extra-curricular activities, 75% in meetings and assemblies,
and others is 50%.

Stakeholders' Contribution
2,500
2,000
2,000
1,500
1,000 1,000 1,000
1,000 Stakeholders' Contribution
500
0
LGU PTCA Teachers Others

The graph shows the stakeholders’ contribution in school PAPs which is

1,000 from LGU, 1,000 from PTCA, 2,000 from Teachers, and 1,000 from others.

Number Of Volunteer Hours per Day

8 6
6 4
4 2 2 Number Of Volunteer Hours
2 1
per Day
0
Brigada Scouting School Recognition Others
Eskwela Contest

The graph shows the number of volunteer hours by each volunteer in

every activity which is 6 hours in Brigada, 4 hours in scouting, 2 hours each in
school contest and recognition day, and others is 1 hours.

10
IV. A. PLANNING WORKSHEET

After a series and thorough brainstorming and analysis of the School Planning

Team members, we have come-up with a school planning worksheet derived from the

results generated from the prioritized school improvement areas of concern.

The plan is devised according to the three key outcomes that we need to address

in order to recognize these pressing prioritizations as stated in our vision. These three

concerns are ACCESS, QUALITY, and GOVERNANCE.

The plan discloses the various programs, projects, and activities of the school to

be implemented to finally reach each general objective according to the three outcomes

towards the realization of our desired vision of improving every act driven to address

priority improvement areas (PIA).

Table 1: Planning Worksheet on Access

Priority TIME FRAME

General
Improvement Root Cause/s 2016- 2017- 2018-
Objective/s
Areas (PIA/s) 17 18 19
Enrollment To increase  Lack of
enrolment rate to schooling
5% over previous interest
enrolment (112 to  Presence of
118) nearby public
schools
 Transfer of
residence of
some families
Intake Rate To increase the  Migration
number of enrollees  Lack of
in Kinder. schooling
interest
Participation To increase the  House chores
participation rate to overload
100%.  Absenteeism
 Family – related
problems

11
Table 2: Planning Worksheet on Quality
Priority TIME FRAME
General
Improvement Root Cause/s 2016- 2017- 2018-
Objective/s
Areas (PIA/s) 17 18 19
Literacy To reduce the  Lack of reading
number of learners interests
in frustration level.  Lack of
teachers’
technique in
teaching
beginning
reading
 No home
follow-ups of
parents due to
illiteracy and
disinterest
caused by work
overload and
others
 Poor study
habits

Table 3: Planning Worksheet on Governance

Priority TIME FRAME
General
Improvement Root Cause/s 2016- 2017- 2018-
Objective/s
Areas (PIA/s) 17 18 19
Nutritional To increase normal  Less nutritious
Status status of learners to food prepared
100%. by families
 No breakfast
meal before
attending
school
 Lack of health
services
SBM To increase SBM  Lack of data
level from level 1 to management
level 2 mechanisms
IMs To develop  Lack of
contextualized IMs teachers’
initiative
Textbooks To increase ratio of  Non delivery of
textbook to pupil K to 12
(1:1) Materials
12
 B. PROJECT DESIGNS
Project Title: Enrolment, Isulong
Problem Statement: Enrolment over the past 5 school years is decreasing.
Objective: To increase enrolment rate to 5% additional enrollees
over previous enrolment (112 to 118)
Root Causes: Transfer of residence/presence of nearby schools

PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX

Person Budget
Activity Output Date Respons Budget Source
ible
Advocacy/ Attendance May to SH P 1,500 MOOE
Information Record June Teachers
Dissemination (Posting of Parents
Tarpaulin) Minutes of Students
Meeting Brgy.
Officials
Early enrollment List of enrollees Jan. Teachers P1,000 MOOE
campaign SH

Adopt-a-Child Program List of adopted Jan. to Teachers Expense Person

students and Dec. SH s of al
their roles and school Budget
responsibilities needs of from
students Teache
List of adopter rs

Home visitation Accomplishment Jan. to Teachers P1,000 MOOE

Reports Dec. SH

Project Title: Intake Rate

Problem Statement: Presence of nearby schools.
Objective: To increase the number of enrollees in Kinder.
Root Causes: Lack of schooling interest.

PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX

Person Budget
Activity Output Date Respons Budget Source
ible
Home Visitation Accomplishment Jan. to Teachers P1,000 MOOE
Reports Dec. SH

13
 Project Title: Participation Rate
Problem Statement: Presence of nearby schools.
Objective: To increase the participation rate to 100%.
Root Causes: Family-related problem.

PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX

Person Budget
Activity Output Date Respons Budget Source
ible
Home visitation Accomplishment Jan. to Teachers P1,000 MOOE
Reports Dec. SH

Project Title: Literacy

Problem Statement: There are still learners under frustration level.
Objective: Reduce the number of identified learners in frustration
level.
Root Causes: Lack of pupils’ reading interests /Poor reading habits

PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX

Person Budget
Activity Output Date Respons Budget Source
ible
Conduct Reading List of Pupils’ June Teachers 1,000 MOOE
Inventory Test/PHIL-IRI Reading Level
(Pre & Post Test) Results
Reading Pieces

Construct Big books, Needs Jan. to Teachers 5,000 MOOE

small books, Dolch charts Assessment Dec. SH
and other reading Results
materials Visual Products

Institutionalize Classroom List of Books Feb. Teachers P2,000 MOOE

Reading /Corner
Log Sheet

Monitoring & Evaluation Summary Jan. to Teacher P500 MOOE

Results of M & March SH
E Guidance
Designat
e

14
 Project Title: Nutritional Status
Problem Statement: There are identified learners under wasted status.
Objective: To increase normal status of learners to 100%.
Root Causes: Poor health condition

PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX

Person Budget
Activity Output Date Respons Budget Source
ible
Health Check-up/Health ACR June Division P1,000 MOOE
Status Inventory Health
Personne
l
Brgy.
Health
Personne
l

Nutritional Status BMI Report June Teachers P500 MOOE

Inventory
Nurse

Classroom handwashing/ Handwashing/ July Teachers P5,000 MOOE

First –Aid Corner
First Aid Corner

Conduct of Deworming Letter July Teachers P1,000 MOOE

Div.
No. of
dewormed Medical
pupils Team

Intensive SBFP Baseline/Endlin Jan. to Teacher P1,000 MOOE

e Nutritional Dec.
Status Report

Monitoring and M & E Tool June to Teachers P500 MOOE

Evaluation Dec. Nurse
Consolidated
Results
ACR

15
 Project Title: SBM
Problem Statement: The SBM level of school is under developing level.
Objective: To increase SBM level from level 1 to level 2.
Root Causes: Lack of data management mechanisms.

PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX

Person Budget
Activity Output Date Respons Budget Source
ible
Committee/ Data List of June Teachers P100 MOOE
assignment Committees and SH
Data-assigned MTs
SPG
PTA
Construction/ Materials July Teachers P5,000 MOOE
Purchase of Data Banks SPT
Data Banks

Monthly Meeting & Data Aug Teachers P2,000 MOOE

Assessment SPT
Checklist

Monitoring Evaluation Aug SH P500 MOOE

Report to Dec. PSDS

Project Title: IMs

Problem Statement: Less contextualized IMs in school.
Objective: To develop contextualized IMs.
Root Causes: Lack of teachers’ initiative

PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX

Person Budget
Activity Output Date Respons Budget Source
ible
Developing Contextualized June to Teacher P10,000 MOOE
contextualized IMs IMs (big/small Dec. SH
books)

16
 Project Title: Textbooks
Problem Statement: Insufficient textbooks in school.
Objective: To increase ratio textbook to learner (1:1)
Root Causes: Non delivery of Textbooks

PROJECT WORK PLAN AND BUDGET MATRIX

Person Budget
Activity Output Date Respons Budget Source
ible
Printing of Textbooks Printed Jan. to Teacher P10,000 MOOE
Textbooks Dec. SH

ANNUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

School Persons Budget Budget

Project Output for Schedule
Improvement Activities Responsi per Source
Objective the Year /Venue
Project Title ble Activity

To increase Attendance Advocacy/ SH May to P 1,500 MOOE

enrolment Record Information Teachers June
rate to 5% Dissemination Parents
over Minutes of (Posting of Students
previous Meeting Tarpaulin) Brgy.
enrolment Officials
(112 to 118) List of Early Teachers Jan. P1,000 MOOE
enrollees enrollment SH
campaign
Enrolment, List of Adopt-a-child Teachers Jan. to Expens
Isulong adopted program SH Dec. es of
students school
and their needs of
roles and students
responsibiliti
es

List of Jan. to
adopter Dec.

To increase Accomplish Home Teachers Jan. to P1,000 MOOE

the number ment report Visitation SH Dec.
Intake Rate of enrollees
in Kinder

17
 To increase Accomplish Home Teachers Jan. to P1,000 MOOE
the ment report Visitation SH Dec.
Participation participation
rate rate to
100%

List of Conduct Teachers June 1,000 MOOE

Pupils’ Reading
Reading Inventory
Level
Test/PHIL-IRI
Results
(Pre & Post
Reading Test)
Pieces

Needs Construct Big Teachers Jan. to 5,000 MOOE

To reduce Assessment books, small SH Dec.
the number Results books, Dolch
of learners Visual charts and
Literacy
in frustration Products other reading
level materials

List of Institutionalize Teachers Feb. P2,000 MOOE

Books Classroom
Reading
Log Sheet
/Corner

Summary Monitoring & Teacher Jan. to P500 MOOE

Results of M Evaluation SH March
&E Guidance
Designate
ACR Health Check- Division June P1,000 MOOE
up/Health Health
Status Personnel
Inventory Brgy.
Health
Personnel

To increase BMI Report Nutritional Teachers June P500 MOOE

normal Status
Inventory Nurse
Nutritional status of
Status learner to
100% Handwashin Classroom Teachers July P5,000 MOOE
g/ handwashing/
First –Aid
First Aid
Corner Corner

Letter Conduct of Teachers July P1,000 MOOE

Deworming Div.
No. of
Medical
dewormed
Team

18
 pupils

Baseline/En Intensive Teacher Jan. to P1,000 MOOE

dline SBFP Dec.
Nutritional
Status
Report

Monitoring June to P500 MOOE

and Teachers Dec.
Evaluation Nurse
List of Committee/ Teachers June P100 MOOE
Committees Data SH
and Data- assignment MTs
assigned SPG
PTA
To increase
Materials Construction/ Teachers July P5,000 MOOE
the SBM
Purchase of SPT
SBM level from Data Banks Data Banks
level 1 to
level 2 Data Monthly Teachers Aug P2,000 MOOE
Meeting & SPT
Checklist Assessment

Evaluation Monitoring SH Aug P500 MOOE

Report PSDS to Dec.

To develop Contextualiz Developing Teacher June to P10,000 MOOE

contextualiz ed IMs contextualized SH Dec.
IMs ed IMs (Big/small IMs (Big/small
Books) Books)

To increase Printed Printing of Teacher June to P10,000 MOOE

ratio of Textbooks Textbooks SH Dec.
Textbooks textbook to
pupil (1:1)

MOOE Monthly: Annual

(Maintenance and Other Operating __________________ Total:________________
Expenses)

19
 SCHOOL PLANNING TEAM

ASLIMA A. H. IBRAHIM
President, SPG

SOLAICA A. ORINTAR
President, Teachers’ Association

ABDULLAH B. BAGUIL
President, PTA

RUBYNA L. MAKIL
Brgy. Captain, Mamaanun

REMONA TATARO-ALI
School Incharge

Certified Funds Available:

TORR AURELIO M. ARDON

Division Accountant

Approved:

EMMALINDA E. DUHAYLUNGSOD, CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent

20
V. MONITORING AND EVALUATION

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

PROJECT OBJECTIVES ACCOMPLISHM ISSUES/ RECOMMENDATIONS CHECK
ENTS/ PROBLEMS/ /ACTION POINTS IF
OUTPUTS/ REASONS FOR DONE*
STATUS TO UNDERACHIVEMENT
DATE
To increase enrolment
rate to 5% over previous
enrolment (112 to 118)
To increase the number
of enrollees in Kinder
To increase the
participation rate to 100%
To reduce the number of
learners in frustration
level
To increase normal status
of learner to 100%
To increase the SBM
level from level 1 to level
2
To develop
contextualized IMs
To increase ratio of
textbook to pupil (1:1)

21
 We, the undersigned teachers and School Planning Team of

MAMAANUN PRIMARY SCHOOL, commit to pursue the following indicative

performance targets and strategies agreed during the School Strategic Planning

and Budget Preparation on Setting School Targets aligned in the district, division

and regional targets. Subsequent planning activities with schools will firm up the

target and detail the district and division strategies to meet the targets.

We commit and affix our signature this day of 2017

at Mamaanun Primary School, Baloi West District, Baloi Lanao del Norte.

REMONA T. ALI
Chairman/SIC

SOLAICA A. ORINTAR YASMIN A. LUMIGUIS

SPT-Representative M&E Coordinator/ICT-Coordinator

22
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region X – Northern Mindanao
Division of Lanao del Norte
Baloi West District
MAMAANUN PRIMARY SCHOOL
MAMAANUN, Baloi, Lanao del Norte

CERTIFICATE OF APROVAL
The undersigned hereby approved and support the implementation of three-year
(2016-2019) Enhanced School Improvement Plan (eSIP) of MAMAANUN PRIMARY
SCHOOL, Mamaanun, Baloi, Lanao del Norte.

Reviewed by:

ERL C. VILLAGONZALO, Ph.D.

SEPS I, Planning and Research

Recommending approval:

MARIA CARMELA T. ABLIN MYRNA LYN M. MAROHOM

Chief SGOD Chief CID

EDWIN R. MARIBOJOC, CESO VI

Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

Approved:

EMMALINDA E. DUHAYLUNGSOD, CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent

23