Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1, FEBRUARY 2010
Abstract—Design, fabrication, and characterization of a When compared to their competition, acoustic-wave sensors
novel surface acoustic wave (SAW) biosensor in complementary present a solid example of the effective use of acoustic-wave
metal–oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology are introduced.
devices in diverse applications. They are versatile, highly
The biosensor employs a streptavidin/biotin-based five-layer
immunoassay for detecting a prominent breast cancer biomarker, sensitive, reliable, reusable, small, inexpensive, can easily be
mammoglobin (hMAM). There is a growing demand to develop designed for responding to various measurands, have a wide
a sensitive and specific assay to detect biomarkers in serum that dynamic range, and they are passive devices which can also be
could be used in the early detection of breast cancer, determining deployed as wireless units. Therefore, acoustic wave devices
prognosis and monitoring therapy. CMOS-SAW devices present
a viable alternative to the existing biosensor technologies by present attractive alternatives to their counterpart technologies
providing higher sensitivity levels and better performance at low in their corresponding sensor applications. The application
costs. Two architectures (circular and rectangular) were developed of interest in this paper, namely, biosensor, presents a solid
and respective tests were presented for performance comparison. example of how effective acoustic-wave sensors can be used in
The sensitivities of the devices were analyzed primarily based on
center frequency shifts. A frequency sensitivity of 8.704 pg/Hz and diverse applications.
a mass sensitivity of 2810.25 m2 kg were obtained. Selectivity tests Surface acoustic waves (SAWs) are generated at the free
were carried out against bovine serum albumin. Experimental surface of piezoelectric material. The application of a varying
results indicate that it is possible to attach cancer biomarkers to voltage to the metal interdigital transducer (IDT) generates the
functionalized CMOS-SAW sensor surfaces and selectively detect
hMAM antigens with improved sensitivities, lowered costs, and acoustic wave on the input side. The acoustic wave generated by
increased repeatability of fabrication. the input IDT travels through the region called the delay line and
Index Terms—Biosensor, cancer, complementary metal–oxide reaches the output IDT where the mechanical displacements
semiconductor (CMOS), microelectromechanical systems due to the acoustic waves create a voltage difference between
(MEMS), surface acoustic wave (SAW). the output IDT fingers. In order to employ mass loading on
SAW sensors, the device surfaces should be functionalized by
selective coatings that react with the entity under analysis. This
I. INTRODUCTION
interaction, while causing a mass loading, produces a shift in
COUSTIC wave devices have been in commercial use
A for more than 60 years [1]. Although the telecommunica-
tions industry has been the primary employer of these devices,
resonant frequency, which then can be measured to analyze
the entity being sensed. The first examples of this approach
came from the field of chemical sensors. Wohltjen and Dessy
they are enjoying a large surge in several new emerging and reported the first use of SAW devices for chemical analysis [2].
developing industries. These industries constitute automotive, They laid out instrumentation design for chemical analysis,
medical, and commercial applications. The vast majority of which uses SAW devices.
these industries use acoustic-wave devices as sensors. These The principle of biosensors is very similar to the chemical
sensors include but are not limited to torque, pressure, biolog- vapor sensors that were listed in the literature. They detect tar-
ical, chemical, temperature, vapor, humidity, and mass sensors. geted biological species in fluid or solid form by employing
mass loading on acoustic-wave devices. This fundamental prin-
Manuscript received February 12, 2009; revised May 18, 2009. First pub- ciple is depicted in Fig. 1 along with a typical frequency-shift-
lished December 04, 2009; current version published January 27, 2010. based response. The surface of these devices also requires a spe-
An earlier version of this paper was presented at IEEE Sensors Conference
28-31 Oct. 2008 and was published in the conference proceedings. cial coating to functionalize the sensors for the analytes of in-
O. Tigli is with Washington State University Vancouver, School of Engi- terest. Several techniques were developed and applied for a va-
neering and Computer Science, Vancouver, WA 98686 USA (e-mail: tigli@wsu.
edu).
riety of analytes. These are DNA-RNA hybridization, adsorp-
L. Bivona and P. Berg are with the George Washington University, Biochem- tion of proteins on functionalized surfaces, lipid-protein inter-
istry and Molecular Biology Department, Washington, DC 20052 USA (e-mail: actions on membranes and piezoimmunosensing [3]. Due to
lbivona@gwu.edu; bcmpeb@gwu.edu).
M. E. Zaghloul is with the George Washington University, Electrical and the high specificity of antigen-antibody reactions and the well-
Computer Engineering Department, Washington, DC 20052 USA (e-mail: za- structured generation of antibodies against a variety of biolog-
ghloul@gwu.edu). ical materials made it possible to build immunosensors that em-
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available online
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. ploy acoustic-wave devices. The application example that is se-
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TBCAS.2009.2033662 lected for this research is essentially a piezoimmunosensor that
1932-4545/$26.00 © 2009 IEEE
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
TIGLI et al.: FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A SAW BIOSENSOR 63
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
64 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. 4, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2010
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
TIGLI et al.: FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A SAW BIOSENSOR 65
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
66 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. 4, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2010
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
TIGLI et al.: FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A SAW BIOSENSOR 67
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
68 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. 4, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2010
Fig. 8. (a) Optical microscopy snapshot of the sensor surface with streptavidin
binding. (b) Fluorescent microscopy snapshot showing a surface coverage effi-
ciency of 80%–90%.
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
TIGLI et al.: FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A SAW BIOSENSOR 69
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
70 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. 4, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2010
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
TIGLI et al.: FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A SAW BIOSENSOR 71
Fig. 13. Overall biosensor response to each set of applied materials. The fre- Fig. 14. Overall frequency change response of circular CMOS-SAW devices.
quency-shift axis shows absolute changes. Each marked interval represents an The dashed line represents the first access point readings and the solid line shows
application for one of the biosensor elements. the data collected from the second access point on the same chip.
note that the frequency shift axes for both cases are plotted for
an absolute change in frequency as opposed to the actual
negative shifts. Another important observation from the figure
is that the Ab gives a shift that is in the same range as the strep-
tavidin. This was expected as the total amount of applied strep-
tavidin mass is slightly larger (0.2 g) than the hMAM Ab-ap-
plied mass.
A very similar overall response was obtained for the circular
device. Fig. 14 presents the results in the same fashion. It is ob-
served that the circular device presents a much higher frequency
shift for the Ab binding. The rest of the experiments yielded Fig. 15. (a) Postprocessed biosensor layers after Au evaporation. (b) Snap-
in frequency shifts of the same ranges. This observation inher- shot that shows the GSG-configured probe tips in contact with the pads of a
ently suggests that the Ab surface coverage was much higher CMOS-SAW biosensor that is patterned for the active gold surface.
for the circular devices. This result is also verified by visual
analysis of the coverage on both chips. In the case of the cir-
shift which is reflected in Figs. 13 and 14 as the final experi-
cular CMOS-SAW biosensor, the streptavidin and hMAM Ab
ment step. This proves that the hMAM Ab layer is selectively
binding sites are highly concentrated on the effective sensing
detecting hMAM protein and not binding to BSA.
area, which is defined by the delay line path. However, for the
rectangular devices, although the amounts of applied materials
VII. CONCLUSION
were kept the same, the actual binding on the sensor surface is
highly dispersed. This argument is supported by the high mag- The CMOS-SAW devices are generic sensor systems that
nification optical microscope snapshots for both cases. Fig. 15 can be employed in various forms of sensor applications with
demonstrates the snapshots of the effective sensor areas with the minimum effort. As a proof of concept for sensor applications,
binding sites. Concentrated binding sites on the circular device the use of CMOS-SAW devices as a biosensor proved to be a
delay-line path are clearly observed. The figures also reveal that viable alternative to currently available piezoimmunosensors.
the access to the contact pads is preserved better for the case of A comprehensive investigation of biological interactions and
circular devices. their integration to the readily available CMOS-SAW devices
In order to demonstrate the selectivity of the CMOS-SAW were carried out. The preliminary studies and pertaining ex-
biosensors, a final set of experiments was conducted. For periments resulted in selective detection of a prominent cancer
selective measurements against hMAM, a competitor protein, biomarker, hMAM. The sensitivity figures agreed closely with
namely, bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used. hMAM-cov- the theoretical calculations that were carried out for compar-
ered biosensors were immersed in BSA solutions with con- ison. However, with an experimentally documented high-tem-
centrations 10 higher than hMAM. The same wash and perature coefficient of delay [38], the limitations imposed by the
incubation procedures were applied. The measurements after dry fashion testing and the testing equipment incurred errors and
the BSA application did not show any significant frequency contributed negatively in the overall performance of the sensors.
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
72 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. 4, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2010
This yielded in at least one degree higher shifts when compared [15] E. Berkenpas, P. Millard, and M. Pereira da Cunha, Novel O157:H7
E.Coli Detector Utilizing a Langasite Surface Acoustic Wave Sensor,
to similar work that employs SAW devices [14]–[16], [39]. Fur- pp. 1237–1240, 2005.
ther investigation of the electrical properties of the biological [16] E. Gizeli, F. Bender, A. Rasmusson, K. Saha, F. Josse, and R. Cernosek,
“Sensitivity of the acoustic waveguide biosensor to protein binding as
materials that were used can potentially provide a method to a function of the waveguide properties,” Biosensors Bioelectron., vol.
decouple the impedance-related errors. Although overexpressed 18, pp. 1399–1406, 2003.
for certain experiments, the biosensor yielded selective detec- [17] E. Gizeli, “Design considerations for the acoustic waveguide
biosensor,” Smart. Mater. Struct., vol. 6, pp. 700–706, 1997.
tion of all the added biomaterials, including the protein of in- [18] O. Tigli and M. Zaghloul, “A novel SAW device in CMOS: Design,
terest hMAM with a relatively easy procedure. Therefore, it can modeling and fabrication,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 219–227,
Feb. 2007.
be concluded that the broad objective to design, model, fabri- [19] O. Tigli and M. Zaghloul, “Design and fabrication of a novel SAW
cate, postprocess, and characterize SAW devices in CMOS tech- biochemical sensor in CMOS,” presented at the IEEE Sensors Conf.,
Special Session: CMOS Based Sensors, Irvine, CA, Oct. 2005, Invited
nology for biosensor applications was fulfilled. These devices talk.
yielded mass sensitivities of 8.704 pg/Hz and 80%–90% strep- [20] O. Tigli and M. Zaghloul, “Design, modeling and characterization of a
novel circular surface acoustic wave device,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 8,
tavidin attachment efficiencies. no. 11, pp. 1807–1815, Nov. 2008.
[21] A. F. Collings and F. Caruso, “Biosensors: Recent advances,” Rep.
Prog. Phys., vol. 60, pp. 1397–1445, 1997.
[22] P. Sklada, “Piezoelectric quartz crystal sensors applied for bioanalyt-
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ical assays and characterization of affinity interactions,” J. Braz. Chem.
Soc., vol. 14-4, pp. 491–502, 2003.
The authors would like to thank Prof. G. Harris for allowing [23] A. Janshoff and C. Steinem, “Sensors technology–applications–mar-
kets,” in Sensors Update, H. Baltes, J. Hesse, and J. G. Korvink, Eds.
them to use the facilities as well as J. Griffin and Dr. Z. Peizhen Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, 2001, vol. 9, ch. 2, pp. 340–342.
for the invaluable technical support in completing SEM and [24] M. B. Cortie, Properties and Potential Applications of Meso-Porous
Gold. Sydney, Australia: Univ. Technol. Sydney, Inst. Nanoscale
AFM characterization. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Technol., 2003.
B. Thibeault for the RIE and Dr. G. Book for the RF sputtering [25] E. Gizeli, “Design considerations for the acoustic waveguide
biosensor,” Smart. Mater. Struct., vol. 6, pp. 700–706, 1997.
work. The postprocessing steps were carried out at The Howard [26] J. Du, G. L. Harding, J. A. Ogilvy, P. R. Dencher, and M. Lake, “A
University Nanoscale Science and Engineering Facility. study of love-wave acoustic sensors,” Sensors Actuators A, vol. 56, pp.
211–219, 1996.
[27] E. Gizeli, A. Stevenson, N. J. Goddard, and C. R. Lowe, “A love plate
biosensor utilizing a polymer layer,” Sensors Actuators B, vol. 6, pp.
REFERENCES 131–137, 1992.
[28] A. Kumar, “Biosensors based on piezoelectric detectors: Theory and
[1] B. Drafts, “Acoustic wave technology sensors,” IEEE Trans. Microw. application,” JOM-e, vol. 52-10, 2000.
Theory Tech., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 795–802, Apr. 2001. [29] K. Catt, G. W. Tregear, H. G. Burger, and G. Skermer, “Antibody-
[2] H. Wohltjen and R. Dessy, “Surface acoustic wave probe for chemical coated tube method for radioimmunoassay of human growth hormone,”
analysis I: Introduction and instrument design,” Anal. Chem., vol. 51, Clin. Chim. Acta., vol. 27, pp. 267–279, 1970.
no. 9, pp. 1458–1475, 1979. [30] N. J. Geddes, A. S. Martin, F. Caruso, R. S. Urquhart, D. N. Furlong,
[3] A. Janshoff, H. J. Galla, and C. Steinem, “Piezoelectric mass-sensing J. R. Sambles, K. A. Than, and J. A. Edgar, “Immobilization of IgG
devices as biosensors- An alternative to optical biosensors?,” Angew. onto gold surfaces and its interaction with anti-IgG studied by surface
Chem. Int. Ed., vol. 39, pp. 4004–4032, 2000. plasmon resonance,” J. Immunol. Meth., vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 149–160,
[4] R. M. Carter, J. J. Mekalanos, M. B. Jacobs, G. J. Lubrano, and G. G. 1994.
Guibault, “Quartz crystal microbalance detection of Vibrio cholerae [31] S. Tombelli, M. Minunni, and M. Mascini, “Piezoelectric biosensors:
O139 serotype,” J. Immunol. Meth., vol. 187, pp. 121–125, 1995. Strategies for coupling nucleic acids to piezoelectric devices,” Biosen-
[5] S. Drost, S. Hauck, E. Yacoub-George, H. Wolf, S. Koch, C. Koßlinger, sors, vol. 37-1, pp. 48–56, 2005.
B. Hillerich, and K. Hieber, “Application of bioactive layers for chem- [32] J. L. Bernstein, J. H. Godbold, G. Raptis, M. A. Watson, B. Levinson,
ical sensors and analysis systems,” Mater. Sci. Forum, vol. 287-288, S. A. Aaronson, and T. P. Fleming, “Identification of mammaglobin as
pp. 521–524, 1998. a novel serum marker for breast cancer,” Clin. Cancer Res., vol. 11, pp.
[6] R. Blonder, S. Levi, G. Tao, I. Ben-Dov, and I. Willner, “The enhance- 6528–6535, 2005.
ment effect of gold nanoparticles as a surface modifier on DNA sensor [33] P. N. Span, E. Waanders, P. Manders, J. J. M. Heuvel, J. A. Foekens, M.
sensitivity,” J. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. 119, pp. 10467–10478, 1997. A. Watson, L. V. A. M. Beex, and F. C. G. J. Sweep, “Mammaglobin
[7] B. Konig and M. Gratzel, “Detection of viruses and bacteria with is associated with low-grade, steroid receptor-positive breast tumors
piezoimmunosensors,” Anal. Lett., vol. 26, pp. 1567–1575, 1993. from postmenopausal patients, and has independent prognostic value
[8] X. D. Zhou, L. J. Liu, M. Hu, L. L. Wang, and J. M. Hu, “Detection of for relapse-free survival tim,” J. Clin. Oncol., vol. 22, pp. 691–698,
hepatitis B virus by piezoelectric biosensor,” J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2004.
vol. 27, pp. 341–345, 2002. [34] K. Grunewald, M. Haun, M. Urbanek, M. Fiegl, E. Muller-Holzner, E.
[9] M. R. T. C. Tan, C. X. Chu, G. L. Shen, F. Y. Xie, and R. Q. Yu, Gunsilius, M. Dunser, C. Marth, and G. Gastl, “Mammaglobin gene ex-
“Piezoelectric immunoassay for the detection of human serum al- pression: A superior marker of breast cancer cells in peripheral blood in
bumin,” Anal. Lett., vol. 30, pp. 1783–1796, 1997. comparison to epidermal-growth-factor receptor and cytokeratin-19,”
[10] S. Saha, M. Raje, and C. R. Suri, “Sandwich microgravimetric im- Lab. Invest., vol. 80, pp. 1071–1077, 2000.
munoassay: Sensitive and specific detection of low molecular weight [35] D. Ho, B. Chu, H. Lee, and C. D. Montemagno, “Directed protein
analytes using piezoelectric quartz crystal,” Biotechnol. Lett., vol. 24, orientation by site-specific labeling,” in Proc. IEEE Nanotechnology,
pp. 711–716, 2002. 2003, vol. 12-14, pp. 1084–1094.
[11] B. S. Attili and A. A. Suleiman, “A piezoelectric immunosensor for the [36] Cascade Microtech, Inc., Dec. 15, 2007. [Online]. Available: www.
detection of cocaine,” Microchem. J., vol. 54, pp. 174–179, 1996. cascademicrotech.com
[12] Y. G. Tan, J. Yin, C. D. Liang, H. Peng, L. H. Nie, and S. Z. Yao, “A [37] “User’s Guide 8712ET and 8714ET RF Network Analyzers,” Agilent
study of a new TSM bio-mimetic sensor using a molecularly imprinted Technologies, , 2007. [Online]. Available: www.agilent.com, 2000
polymer coating and its application for the determination of nicotine in [38] H. Liao, “Optical nonlinearity of nanocrystalline Au/ZnO composite
human serum and urine,” Bioelectrochem., vol. 53, pp. 141–148, 2001. films,” Opt. Lett., vol. 28, no. 19, pp. 1790–1792, 2003.
[13] R. Ganske, The use of the SAWS-Immuno-biosensor for detection [39] D. D. Stubbs, S.-H. Lee, and W. D. Hunt, “Molecular recognition for
of human interleukin-6 Axela Biosensors, 2006. [Online]. Available: electronic noses using surface acoustic wave immunoassay sensors,”
http://www.atonomics.com IEEE Sensors J., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 294–300, Aug. 2002.
[14] E. Berkenpas, S. Bitla, P. Millard, and M. Pereira da Cunha, “Pure [40] G. McHale, M. I. Newton, and F. Martin, “Theoretical mass sensitivity
shear horizontal SAW biosensor on langasite,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason., of love wave and layer guided acoustic plate mode sensors,” J. Appl.
Ferroelectr., Freq. Control, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 1404–1410, Nov. 2004. Phys., vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 9701–9710.
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.
TIGLI et al.: FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A SAW BIOSENSOR 73
Onur Tigli (M’08) was born in Istanbul, Turkey, in Patricia Berg received the B.A. degee in mathe-
1979. He received the B.S. degree (Hons.) in elec- matics from the University of Chicago, Chicago,
trical and electronics engineering from the Middle IL, and the Ph.D. degree in microbiology from the
East Technical University (METU), Ankara, Turkey, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago.
in 2000, and the M.S. and D.Sc. degrees in computer Currently, she is a Professor in the Department of
engineering from The George Washington University Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at the George
(GWU), Washington, DC, in 2002 and 2007, respec- Washington University Medical Center. Her basic
tively. molecular biology/translational laboratory is focused
During his graduate studies, he worked for the Na- on the study of a gene she discovered and cloned,
tional Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) called BP1. Her laboratory has shown that BP1 is
Semiconductor Electronics Division, Naval Re- activated in 80% of invasive ductal breast tumors,
search Lab (NRL) Materials Science and Technology Division, and completed 70% of prostate tumors, and 63% of acute myeloid leukemias. In breast cancer,
projects on areas of system-on-a-chip, application-specific integrated-circuit the BP1 expression is associated with aggressive tumors and progression. Her
field-programmable gate-array (ASIC/FPGA) design, chemical sensors, and laboratory is studying the molecular pathways regulated by BP1 in tumor
microelectromechanical-systems (MEMS) fabrication techniques. Currently, cells and, on the clinical side, is testing possible suppressors. In addition, the
he is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at Washington State development of a blood test is underway, making it important to develop assays
University Vancouver. His current research deals with the development of for sensitive detection of biomolecules in blood.
zinc–oxide nanowire-based biosensors for single molecule detection of cancer
biomarkers as well as complementary metal–oxide semiconductor-compat-
ible nano/microfabrication techniques, finite-element method modeling for
nanoelectromechanical systems and acoustic MEMS, and evolvable hardware Mona E. Zaghloul (M’81–SM’85–F’96) received
employing digital ASIC/FPGA design techniques. He has three provisional the B.S. degree from Cairo University, Egypt, in
patent applications pending for the development of “CMOS-SAW based 1965, and the Masters degree in science, the Masters
biochemical sensor with temperature control,” “A novel circular SAW device degree in math, and the Ph.D. degree from the
in CMOS,” and “Multiplex biosensor for cancer biomarker detection.” University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, in
Dr. Tigli has held several teaching positions at GWU since 2002, for which 1970, 1971, and 1975, respectively.
he received the Philip Amsterdam excellence in teaching award in 2006. His Currently, she is a Professor of Electrical and Com-
dissertation “Novel SAW devices in CMOS for biosensor applications: Design, puter Engineering at the George Washington Univer-
modeling, fabrication and characterization” was selected as the official nominee sity, Washington, DC, where she is also Director for
of GWU for the 2008 CGS/UMI Distinguished Dissertation Award. the Institute for MEMS and VLSI Technology. She
has published more than 270 technical papers in the
general areas of circuits and systems, microelectronics system design, very-
large-scale integrated (VLSI) circuits design, sensors design, and microelec-
Louis Bivona was born in Baltimore, MD, in 1984. tromechanical systems. She has also contributed to several books. Her main re-
He received the B.S. degree in biochemistry from the search interests are in the areas of analog design of VLSI circuits, design, and
University of Maryland, College Park, in 2006 and implementation of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) with applications
the M.S. degree in biochemistry from The George to radio frequency (RF)-MEMS, and biosensors.
Washington University, Washington, DC.
He worked in the laboratory of Dr. Patricia Berg,
where his main research focus was developing a
blood screen as an early detection tool for breast
cancer. He currently performs research at the Na-
tional Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, and is
with the Laboratory of Immunogenetics, developing
novel techniques aiding in recombinant protein expression.
Authorized licensd use limted to: IE Xplore. Downlade on May 13,20 at 1:482 UTC from IE Xplore. Restricon aply.