Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Reviewed Work(s): The Singing Revolution by Maureen Castle Tusty, James Tusty, Thor
Halvorssen, Mike Majoros and Mountain View Productions
Review by: Jeffers Engelhardt
Source: Ethnomusicology, Vol. 53, No. 1 (WINTER 2009), pp. 179-181
Published by: University of Illinois Press on behalf of Society for Ethnomusicology
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25653059
Accessed: 23-10-2019 19:53 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
University of Illinois Press, Society for Ethnomusicology are collaborating with JSTOR
to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ethnomusicology
This content downloaded from 193.40.142.252 on Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:53:47 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Vol. 53, No. 1 Ethnomusicology Winter 2009
This content downloaded from 193.40.142.252 on Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:53:47 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
180 Ethnomusicoiogy, Winter 2009
This content downloaded from 193.40.142.252 on Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:53:47 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Film, Video, and Multimedia Reviews 181
ings: What causal relationships existed (if any) between music and revolu
tionary sociopolitical change in Estonia between 1987 and 1991? To what
extent were experiences of the Singing Revolution (particularly collective
musical experiences) alike? How have memories of the Singing Revolution
been transformed by dominant social ideologies and historical interpretations
since 1991? What sense do those living in Estonia make of the Soviet lega
cies they encounter? What does it mean to sing the anthems of the Singing
Revolution today (Engelhardt 2006)? Although the film implicitly addresses
these questions, it does so without much explicit critical engagement.
The Singing Revolution is technically polished and very well produced,
and the filmmakers document with conviction and sympathy historical events
whose impact was global. It is also an object lesson in how music can shape
historical consciousness, how nationalist) narratives can efface historical
contingencies, and how music-making can drive revolutionary sociopolitical
change by enacting that to which it aspires. Ideally, the filmmakers would
have found time for more critical reflection on the complexity of the story
they tell, including how Baltic Germans influenced the early Estonian song
festivals, how participation in choral singing actually expanded within the
Soviet system, how lionized figures like Gustav Ernesaks accomplished what
they did by accommodating Soviet ideologies, and how Russian-speakers
living in Estonia experienced the Singing Revolution. All told, however, The
Singing Revolution is an important resource for students and scholars inter
ested in music, cultural history, and sociopolitical transformation in Eurasia
and the (post)socialist world.
References
Engelhardt, Jeffers. 2006. "Intangible Heritage, Tangible Transformations: UNESC
the Rescaling of Baltic Song and Dance Celebrations." Paper presented at the
Meeting of the Society for Ethnomusicology, Honolulu, Hawai'i.
This content downloaded from 193.40.142.252 on Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:53:47 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms