Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A
STUDY REPORT
ON
"PERFOMANCE REVIEW SYSTEM IN HALCYON TECHNOLOGY "
A Project Submitted in Partial fulfillment for the award of Degree of
Submitted by
SHAIK AHMED
Assistant Professor
(2017-2019)
[Type text]
(2017-2019)
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the project work titled “PERFOMANCE REVIEW SYSTEM IN
award of degree of Master of Business Administration for the academic year 2017-2019 of
JNTU Hyderabad. This Project work is original and not submitted earlier for the award of any
EXTERNAL EXAMINER
[Type text]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I Thank Shri Suresh Garu and his Team for their enormous support in furnishing the
data and details, where their guidance fetched me a lot of onsite knowledge and making this
project complete.
My verbal abilities limit the expression of heartfelt feelings towards my parents and
family members, friends whose untiring efforts have helped me to great extent. God has been
always with me giving hope and courage to accomplish task in time.
H NO: 17UC1E0005
[Type text]
DECLARATION
I SHAIK ASRA NAAZ bearing H No: 17UC1E0005, hereby declare that the project
under the esteemed guidance of SHAIK AHMED PASHA Assistant Professor Department of
MBA submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master
of Business Administration.
I declare that this work is done solemnly by me and to the best of my knowledge; no such
work has been submitted by any other person for the award of Degree or Diploma.
I also declare that all the information collected from primary and secondary sources has
INDEX
Table of Contents:
2. Introduction
3. Company Profile
4. Methodology / Approach
6. Data Analysis
7. Findings
8. Recommendations
9. Annexure-1 (Questionnaire)
12. Bibliography
[Type text]
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
[Type text]
CHAPTER-II
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL ON HALCYON
COMPANY
[Type text]
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
2. In this way, one period of the yearly performance the board cycle is
performance appraisal, the way toward looking into representative
performance opposite the set desires in a practical way, recording the survey,
and conveying the audit verbally in an eye to eye meeting, to rise performance
principles year over year through legit and productive criticism. In the process
[Type text]
Let the workers know where they remain to the extent that their performance
is concerned and to help them with useful analysis and direction with the end
goal of their improvement.
person in this way will bring benefits to their role, and will
increase motivation and loyalty.
o Invite any other points or questions - make sure you capture any
other concerns.
o Close positively- Thank the appraisee for their contribution to the
meeting and their effort through the year, and commit to helping
in any way you can.
o Record main points, agreed actions and follow-up - Swiftly
follow-up the meeting with all necessary copies and
confirmations, and ensure documents are filed and copied to
relevant departments.
4. When to evaluate?
1. Has the previous year been great/terrible/tasteful or generally for you, and
why?
[Type text]
3. What do you like and aversion about working for this association?
5. What components of your activity intrigue you the most, and least?
Advantages:
Some raters can be extreme, and some tolerant. A few divisions have
profoundly skilled individuals though others have less capable
individuals.
Personal predisposition can supplant hierarchical models. As a result of
the inclination, some non-capable workers may get a favored treatment.
Sometimes there will in general be absence of correspondence. The
representatives may not realize they are being judged. No performance
appraisal framework can be compelling if the assessed don't have the
foggiest idea about the criteria under which they have been evaluated
and judged.
[Type text]
1. Positioning or Ranking
- It is finished by setting the appraisee on numerical scales i.e. first, second, third
and so on in the absolute gathering.
Under this technique the appraiser contrasts every representative and each
other worker, each one in turn.
3. Evaluating
4. Realistic Scales
- The elements incorporated into the structure are Employee attributes, for
example, initiative, helpfulness, excitement, dedication and so on or Employee
commitment which incorporates amount and nature of work, explicit objectives
accomplished, consistency of participation, obligation accepted and so forth.
5. Agenda
- The estimation of each inquiry might be weighted I.e. one can have
foreordained scale and scoring to those inquiries.
6. Article
- The appraiser is approached to put in words his impressions about the worker.
7. Classified Reporting
3. Assessment Centers
The significant abilities that are made a decision in evaluation focuses are
relational aptitudes, scholarly capacity, arranging and sorting out capacities,
[Type text]
4. Management by Objectives
V. Feedback
5. 360º Feedback
1. Self-appraisal
2. Predominant appraisal
3. Subordinate's appraisal
4. Companion appraisal.
[Type text]
I. Highlights:
intranet-based
Ease of utilization
Sophisticated work process
[Type text]
Centralized
User adjustable execution evaluation shapes
Automated email warning and update take note
Comprehensive status and activity see for HR chief
Competency-based content answers as well as range scale
Self-rating abilities
II. Advantages:
Appraisals are handled all the more rapidly and productively.
Appraisal information is gotten by concerned prevalent/director in
virtual ongoing when the evaluation is transferred into e-Appraisal
framework..
Appraisals can't be lost or lost, as is conceivable with printed copies.
Evaluations can be put away electronically and accessible on the web
Administrations
• Application improvement
• Consulting
• QA and testing
[Type text]
CHAPTER-III
TECHNICAL
ADVANCEMENT
[Type text]
Advancements
• J2EE Technologies
BPO Solutions
• Data examination and handling of Rate and Residuals for Car Dealerships
• Information Capture
• Document Conversation
Articles
HALCYON offer item advancement administrations improved with their
experience and innovation mastery. HALCYON has created items on driving
innovations with a solid direction toward gauges driven engineering.
Articles created by HALCYON for Automotive Retail industry are:
• Vehicle Comparison Search Engine and Market Analyzer
hy HALCYON?
HALCYON Advantage:
.
The accompanying techniques were embraced:-
The administration was drawn nearer to talk about the substance of Review
approach with the goal that a successful strategy can be structured which will
be helpful thus forward.
A redid Performance Review Policy was structured which was a blend of two
strategies for Appraisal I.e. Self-Review technique and Peer Feedback strategy.
Then the colleagues were approached to top off the Self Review Form and
submit it to the HR division which thusly passed it to the group heads.
A coordinated gathering was fixed with the group chief by the colleagues in like
manner. This was to examine different parts of execution of the worker like
talking about the appraisals given by the assesse and to assess his general
execution and set new objectives.
[Type text]
Then the appraiser gives his very own rating to the representative after the
one – one discourse and afterward the report is submitted to the analyst and a
last exchange happens with the HR Manager to continue with the following
game-plan like defining of objectives, climb in pay rates, execution connected
motivators, and so forth.
LIMITATIONS
1. The Appraisal Process was designed but I could be a part of only Review
Process which was conducted in the months of May and June.
2. Due to time constraint the Post Feedback of Employees regarding the
Review Process could not be taken.
[Type text]
CHAPTER –IV
DATA ANALYSIS
&INTERPRETATION
[Type text]
DATA ANALYSIS
1. MY SELF ASSESSMENT RESULT CONTRIBUTES TO MY FINAL
APPRAISAL RESULT
2. Do you agree that the review will help me to improve the future
working performance
From the above graph it is clear that 65% of the Employees agree where 25%
are pleased and 10% reject t to accept the parameter
[Type text]
3. Do you know all the aspects and standards that are used to evaluate
my performance
The above representation reflects that 30% strongly agree that they
know all the aspects and standards that are used to evaluate their
performance. Where 30 % are pleased and 40 % strongly reject this parameter
[Type text]
The above representation depicts that 45% strongly agree 25% agree and 30%
reject the parameter
[Type text]
10%
30%
60%
AS per the above graph, 55% strongly agree to have training programs
where 30% of are willing to have and 15% of the people are not willing to have
training programs in performance review.
[Type text]
10%
30%
60%
As per the above graphical representation, we can know 70% the people
strongly agree 20% agree and 10% disagree to look forward to change post
review.
[Type text]
10%
30%
60%
The Above Graph Says That 60% of The Employees Say That the Work
Behavior Is Important in Review Process and 40% moderately agree with the
parameter
[Type text]
10%
30%
60%
CHAPTER –V
Finding & Suggestions
[Type text]
FINDINGS
As the entire Process was planned by the HR division, I was likewise
associated with it from the structuring stage to the execution part of the
Review framework. In this procedure I could perceive the advantages inferred
out of this framework just as watched a few disadvantages.
My Findings from the survey were:
1. The impression of representatives with respect to execution Review
was a climb in Salary, which isn't the situation as a general rule.
2. After knowing the necessities of representatives an instructional
meeting was led to enable the workers to comprehend the need and
procedure of Performance Review and Criteria to give Self Rating.
3. They knew about the way that the General Work Behavior would
assume a noteworthy job in their Review however were ignorant of
the considerable number of Standards and Aspects used to Evaluate
their Performance
Different Findings:
1. The procedure did not happen in the specific time period as arranged
and planned.
2. A great improvement was found in the between close to home
connection between the group head and subordinates.
3. Many workers couldn't legitimize the appraisals given by them in the
Self Review Form.
4. It helped the workers in understanding their past exhibition and
setting up of targets and objectives for future.
5. They got the opportunity to comprehend the hierarchical needs and
it helped in building up a feeling of belongingness towards the
organization.
[Type text]
Recommendations
a. Strongly agree
b. Neutral
c. Strongly disagree
a. Strongly agree
b. Neutral
c. Strongly Disagree
3. I know all the aspects and standards that are used to evaluate my
performance.
a. Strongly agree
b. Neutral
c. Strongly Disagree
[Type text]
a. Strongly agree
b. Neutral
c. Strongly Disagree
a. To an Extent
b. Totally
c. Not at all
a. To an Extent
b. Totally
c. Not at all
a. To an Extent
b. Totally
c. Not at all
a. Salary
b. Responsibility
c. Team Structure
9. How do you rate the importance of General Work Behavior in your Review
Process?
a. Not Important
b. Some What Important
c. Most Important
[Type text]
a. To an Extent
b. Totally
c. Not at all
[Type text]
Designation DOR
Location Period
(To be filled in by the Employee and discussed with the Director/ Person
reporting to)
1.
2.
3.
4.
[Type text]
5.
6.
Facilitating Hindering
[Type text]
IV. Notes: (Write here a brief description about your work at Halcyon)
V. Reviewer’s Feedback
Technical Communications
Knowledge
Logical Skills
Standards Proactive
(To be filled in by the Employee after discussion with the Director/ Person
reporting to)
1.
2.
3.
[Type text]
4.
5.
6.
Worst
0
Bad
1
Ok
2
Good
3
Very Good
4
Excellent
5
[Type text]
Bibliography
Websites:
www.citehr.com
www.google.com
www.custominsight.com