Running head: ARGUMENT FOR GOD'S EXISTENCE 1

The argument for God's Existence

Student's name

Institution Name
ARGUMENT FOR GOD'S EXISTENCE 2

The argument for God's Existence

Ontological Argument for God's Existence

In Saint Anselm's famous work "Proslogion," Anselm talked about his objective of

exhibiting "a solitary contention that required only itself alone for verification. Without

anyone else's input, be sufficient to show that God truly exists." that, then which no greater

can be conceived," along these lines can't be possibly enhanced (Gendler, 2008). In light of

this definition, or what he comprehended to be the idea of God's being, Anselm built up a

contention for the presence of God. Different rationalists, for example, Gaunilo, Moore, and

Rowe, who held restricting assessments, have gone after for a considerable length of time to

collapse this contention. In this paper, I will discuss Saint Anselm's Ontological claim for the

presence of God.

Holy person Anselm, a famous Christian philosopher and scholar, is the trailblazer of

the ontological contention. His contention spins around the idea of God being "that, then

which no greater can be conceived." Since God is flawless in each perspective, there could be

no more prominent power or individual that surpasses its flawlessness. Anselm called

attention to that there are two different ways for something to exist: to exist just in the psyche

and to exist in the brain only as a general rule. For instance, a unicorn would be an animal

that we can envision, though a pony would be a creature we can envision and find, in

actuality (Gasper, 2017). In Anselm's contention, he expresses that anything that is viewed as

high would be better if it existed in both our creative mind and in reality. For instance, a

nonexistent association with the ideal accomplice perfect inside and out would be significant;

yet to have that relationship, all things considered, would be better. Reviewing the meaning

of God in this contention is that God is the best thing that we can evoke in our psyches, the

main idea more prominent than our creative mind of God, would be an excellent rendition of

God. This gives us an end that God exists.

ARGUMENT FOR GOD'S EXISTENCE 3

Anselm explains the qualification among understanding and existing in reality.

Anselm says that anything which has a considerable, physical nearness is more important

than something that exists just in thought. For example, on the off chance that one in some

way or another figured out how to break down a steed and a unicorn, the horse would have a

general increasingly unmistakable nearness since it exists openly outside of one's thoughts,

where a unicorn doesn't. This thought can be applied to the conflict of the proximity of God

(Gasper, 2017). The Fool's cognizance of God, as it exists just in his mind, is unsatisfactory

because He doesn't exist when in doubt. Since this in-figured only God isn't certified, it has

lived in a less essential course than a thing that exists in fact. Since the general significance of

God is that He is a being what nothing increasingly imperative can be thought, the Fool's God

that exists basically in mind cannot be the authentic God that is the most extraordinary thing

known to man.

The explanation Anselm's contention works are because the characteristics are making

God the absolute best being has inherent maximums. For instance, transcendence, Omni

benevolence, and omniscience are on the whole traits of God (Gendler, 2008). Immaculate

learning would imply that God knows all and just all-certainties since it is difficult to identify

any longer than that. Clean power means being able to do anything conceivable since it is

challenging to accomplish more than that. If any of God's properties didn't have an inborn

greatest, at that point, Anselm's contention would be mixed up only like Gaunilo's

complaint.

Gaunilo recommends that the contention made by Anselm can be utilized for

demonstrating the presence of anything we can envision. He concocted an allegation in a

similar structure as Anselm's to confirm the presence of the "Lost Island." Gaunilo

recommended that there is an ideal island with an abundance of wealth and fortunes. He

envisions this perfect island; hence, the island exists in his psyche (Gendler, 2008). On the off
ARGUMENT FOR GOD'S EXISTENCE 4

chance that this island can be envisioned, at that point, it must exist. Else, it would not be the

best island, and any land which truly exists will be more phenomenal than it; thus, the island

envisioned to be progressively high won't be increasingly fantastic. Gaunilo contended that

contentions utilizing a similar structure as Anselm's could be used to demonstrate the

presence of items one wanted the most. However, that doesn't make that article genuine.

Notwithstanding, the counter-example given by Gaunilo is incomprehensible because the

reason for the contention isn't mentioned in wrong way.

These features that make an island extraordinary are characteristics that can't be

estimated for a most extreme limit. Regardless of how extraordinary an island is, there is

continuously a plausibility of envisioning a more noteworthy island (Gasper, 2017). For

instance, if the ideal island was to have a wealth of natural products, the amount of

abundance cannot be estimated as there is no most significant measure of bounty. This is the

explanation the ideal island can't be thought to exist and why Gaunilo has neglected to

question Anselm's contention.

Anselm's contention on the presence of God has caused numerous debates among

rationalists considerably after hundreds of years have passed. Numerous protesters have

attempted to flatten his claim, including Gaunilo. Even though Gaunilo has neglected to

question the ontological contention, there are loads of other conceivable issues with

investigate.
ARGUMENT FOR GOD'S EXISTENCE 5

References

Gendler, T. S. (2008). Table of contents from the elements of philosophy: Readings from past

and present.

Gasper, G. E. (2017). Anselm of Canterbury and his theological inheritance. Routledge.