Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS
Thesis Adviser
May 2019
ii
APPROVAL SHEET
Member Member
____________________ ____________________
Date Date
Adviser
____________________
Date
____________________ ____________________
Date Date
iii
ABSTRACT
implementation in thermoelectric solar cells and modified tin stoves. The two
which the thermoelectric solar cell harvests solar energy while the modified tin
stove harvests heat energy. Different system variations were simulated and tested
to achieve optimal system designs. System simulations were done using Solidworks
and data gathering was done using the Arduino Uno microcontroller. The SP1848-
modified tin stove’s TEG array is connected in series-parallel and exhibits an output
of 15 Ω, an efficiency of 0.57%, and was able to charge the same battery from
minimum voltage to maximum in 40 minutes. The study shows that the SP1848-
27145 TEG can be used in energy harvesting systems with acceptable results.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
v
vi
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................... iv
CHAPTER 1 ........................................................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1
CHAPTER 2 ......................................................................................................... 16
2.1.2 Sustainable Energy Solutions for Rural Areas and Application for
Groundwater Extraction .............................................................................. 17
CHAPTER 3 ......................................................................................................... 30
METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................. 30
3.4.1 TEG and Heatsink efficiency variation for Thermoelectric Solar Cell
........................................................................................................................ 43
CHAPTER 4 ......................................................................................................... 52
CHAPTER 5 ......................................................................................................... 89
CURRICULUM VITAE...................................................................................... 97
xi
List of Figures
Figure 2.3 Gas Stove Burner with TEG and Heatsink Configuration ................... 21
Figure 2.4 Phone Charging Gas Stove Burner with TEG ...................................... 22
Figure 4.1 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
without spacing (isometric view). .......................................................................... 54
Figure 4. 2 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
without spacing (side view). .................................................................................. 54
Figure 4.3 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 2cm spacing (isometric view). ....................................................................... 55
Figure 4.4 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 2cm spacing (side view). ............................................................................... 55
Figure 4.5 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 4cm spacing (isometric view). ....................................................................... 56
Figure 4.6 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 4cm spacing (side view). ............................................................................... 56
Figure 4.11 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module without heatsink (isometric view). ............................................................ 62
Figure 4.12 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module without heatsink (side view). .................................................................... 62
Figure 4.13 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink (isometric view). ................................................................. 64
Figure 4.14 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink (side view). ......................................................................... 64
xiii
Figure 4.15 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink and water coolant (isometric view). ................................... 66
Figure 4.16 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink and water coolant (side view). ............................................ 67
Figure 4.17 Open circuit voltage of a single TEG module for solar energy
harvesting. .............................................................................................................. 69
Figure 4.18 Equivalent circuit for the TEG for solar energy harvesting. .............. 69
Figure 4.20 Equivalent circuit for the 15 TEG array in series. .............................. 70
Figure 4.22 Voltage output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output......................................................................................................... 72
Figure 4.23 Power output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output......................................................................................................... 73
Figure 4. 29 Voltage output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output......................................................................................................... 79
Figure 4.30 Power output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output......................................................................................................... 80
Figure 4.32 Heat input and efficiency of the TEG array for solar energy harvesting
application. ............................................................................................................. 83
xiv
Figure 4.33 Heat input and efficiency of the TEG array for energy harvesting in tin
stove. ...................................................................................................................... 83
Figure 4.35 Phone battery percentage with respect to charging time .................... 86
Figure 4.36 Battery voltage level with respect to charging time. .......................... 86
Figure 4.37 Effective battery voltage as a function of charging time (solar cell). 87
Figure 4.38 Effective battery voltage as a function of charging time (tin stove). . 88
xv
List of Tables
Table 4.3 Simulation parameters for simulating the TEG module without heatsink.
................................................................................................................................ 61
Table 4.4 Simulation summary for the TEG without heatsink. ............................. 63
Table 4.5 Simulation parameters for simulating the TEG module. ....................... 63
INTRODUCTION
Energy has become a necessity in our day to day lives and is an important
misuse of energy sources has led to different energy related problems such as energy
shortages, and pollution [1]. This has led researchers to start studying about energy
harvesting from renewable energy sources and waste heat. One type of energy
TEGs are devices that convert a temperature difference into electricity [2,
3]. Some of the current researches about TEGs include applying them on different
waste heat sources such as car engine [4], the effects on TEG efficiency when
attaching to different heat conducting metals [5], and the effects of varying TEG
Arrays connection [6]. However, these researches use high end TEGs that have a
relatively high cost, personalized or under proprietorship. Also, TEGs are still at its
early stage of development with little information known regarding its energy
harvesting, it can provide information for its development and its implementation
renewable energy sources and energy harvesting tin stoves for waste heat
utilization.
2
implement them on different energy harvesting systems. This study aims to provide
characterization of the SP1848-27145 TEG, an accessible and low cost TEG, and
constructing thermoelectric solar cells and energy harvesting tin stoves with it.
The general objective of the study is to be able to harvest energy from solar
radiation and heat from tin stove into electrical energy using thermoelectric
The data from this study regarding TEGs will help contribute to the early
stages of of small sized devices that can then be used for energy harvesting systems.
These systems can be applied in industries, such as the waste heat recovery of heat
manufactured devices, the manufacturing of new technology that utilizes TEGs, and
even the manufacturing of new models of TEGs that are easily obtainable and have
defined characteristics.
everyone in their homes, especially in places that have very hot sunlight radiation
The designed energy harvesting tin stove in this study can help people in
rural areas that have low energy distribution as an extra source of energy.
thermoelectric solar cells and energy harvesting tin stoves that helps in renewable
2. The analysis of the system is limited to the time it takes for the TEG to stop
generating electricity due to the cold side’s temperature becoming the same
4. The improvement of a TEG’s efficiency is not part of the scope of this study.
5
The following terms listed below are conceptually defined so that the
readers will understand what is meant when certain key terms are used. The terms
environment and converted into usable electric power. Energy harvesting allows
the need to run wires or make frequent visits to replace batteries. An energy
Solar Energy – The energy that radiates from the Sun. The Sun is like a massive
nuclear reactor from which deep in its core, nuclear fusion reaction produce
massive amounts of energy that radiates outward in the form of light and heat.
convert heat directly into electricity. Such devices are based on thermoelectric
effects involving interactions between the flow of heat and of electricity through
chip.
Boost – The word boost in this study is used to describe the amplification of
voltage, specifically, the voltage that the TEG array generates for it to be high
sunlight, wind, rain, waves, tides, and geothermal heat—that are naturally
The following sections explain the theories and concept behind the
difference between the two substances. Current is produced when the two dissimilar
electric conductors have a high enough temperature difference. If the hot and cold
junctions of the semiconductors are interchanged, the flow of the current reverses.
making use of the Seebeck Effect. Moreover, thermoelectric generators are solid –
state heat engines made of pairs of p-type and n-type elements. The p-type elements
are made of semiconductor materials doped such that the charge carriers are positive
or the holes and the Seebeck coefficient is positive. On the other hand, the n- type
elements are made of semiconductor material doped such that the charge carriers
element contains negatively charged carriers, while the P-type element contains
positively charged carriers. Heating the hot side of the TEG will excite the electrons
and holes and cause them to travel towards the colder side of the TEG, as heat
9
always travels from the hotter part into the colder part. The greater the temperature
the difference from between the hot side and the cold side, the more excited the
carriers become. Wires are then attached to the cold side of the TEG where the
excited carriers flow into the wires, generating a current in the wires which can be
1.7.3 Thermocouple
are made with two wires of different metals, joined together at one end to form a
junction. The junction is placed on the surface or in the environment that's being
measured. As the temperature changes, the two dissimilar metals begin to deform,
Thermocouples are desirable because they're extremely low cost, simple to use, and
The MAX6675 is a module for the Arduino Uno. The device measures the
output of a K Thermocouple and provides the result to the Arduino via a SPI
10
interface. It has a small end point making it suitable to measure temperatures in the
engineering projects because of its ease to use and flexibility in doing different
tasks. It has 14 digital input/output pins in which 6 can be used as PWM outputs, a
power jack and a reset button. This contains all the required support needed for
USB cable, with an AC-to-DC adapter, or with a battery. Because of its features,
voltage magnitude that is greater than the input voltage magnitude. It amplifies the
boost converter.
Thermal paste is a very high heat conductive paste that is used between two
objects to get better heat conduction. It fills in all those microscopic imperfections
in between two objects that can trap air in them and cause a loss in the heatsink’s
1.7.8 Solidworks
like extruding and lofting to produce the solid shape. It is used in various
electrons.
𝑘𝐴∆𝑇
𝑞=
𝑑
Where:
13
when the heated fluid is caused to move away from the source of heat, carrying
𝑞 = 𝑘𝐴∆T
Where:
Thermal efficiency is defined for engines and devices which are used to
𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡
𝑛= ⋅ 100
𝑃𝑖𝑛
Where:
Following the first law of thermodynamics which states that energy cannot
because in any system there are always inefficiencies usually in the form of friction
The terms listed below were used in the research are conceptually and
consumption problem in China’s iron and steel industry with a focus on recovering
waste heat to solve the problem. The study concludes with confirmation that the
waste heat produced in China’s iron and steel industry has not been used and is a
key point in solving energy efficiency problems in the future. The study also stated
that although waste heat recovery technology is important for efficient handling of
energy, more research and development is required in order for the technology to
have great impact in the world of energy production and energy by-product.
17
2.1.2 Sustainable Energy Solutions for Rural Areas and Application for
This book by Fong states that the Sun can easily provide a more than
sufficient amount of energy to meet the worldwide energy demand. However, due
harvesting, the technology still has a long way to progress in order to be sufficiently
This book also states the advantages of solar energy harvesting systems.
Which is that solar energy harvesting systems have low operating costs, low
maintenance requirement, has high life expectancy and is environment friendly. The
hybrid systems is investigated. Four different variations were done. One variation
doesn’t include a radiation concentrator from a PV system where the TEG is placed
between the solar cell and heat extractor, while the other three included the
18
concentrator with varying placements of the concentrator, TEG, PV cell, and heat
efficiency and the temperature difference of the 2 sides of the TEG with efficiency
reaching up to 4% at 155 °C with a generated power of 3W. This study shows that
the TEG-based hybrid systems have comparable cost and efficiency with that of the
based system today is higher than that of the TEG based one, the expected
Prototype [14]
the solar absorber, the thermoelectric generator (TEG), and the heat management
system. The constructed system consisted of high end materials and many solar
absorbing components. The solar absorbing system consists of a high flux solar
furnace directed into the TEG system that is encased in a water-cooled quartz
window, with a thermal/optical cavity to ensure that solar radiation bounces back
into the solar selective absorber into the high end TEG. The cooling system includes
19
water cooling and a heatsink. This complex system made with high end materials
A flat panel STEG prototype was designed and constructed that was able to
achieve a peak efficiency of 4.6%. The value is reportedly 6-7 higher than that of
the usual flat panel STEGs. This was achieve by the use of high-performance
environment.
with large heatsinks are mounted around the lower portion of a designed metal
stove. A similar approach to our study but with more in depth focus on biogas and
kitchen system design. The researchers were able to produce up to just 1 Watt of
power with major improvements on their metal stove to allow for optimal TEG
21
performance. The difference with this and our current study is that no changes will
be made to the tin can stove, it will be left just as how the people used it before and
up to now. This study by Masamayor concludes that even with peak temperature
difference, very high heat source, and optimal system design, common commercial
thermoelectric generators will still have very low power yield which the researchers
are needed.
Figure 2.3 Gas Stove Burner with TEG and Heatsink Configuration
2.3.2 Conversion of Wasted Heat Energy into Electrical Energy Using TEG [7]
In this study, the researchers were able to charge a mobile phone using a
modified setup that includes heating up a high-end TEG using a gas burner as a heat
source. They used a long sheet of aluminum with a the burner on one end, and the
TEG with a heatsink attached to the other end. They then used a boost converter to
22
boost the output voltage of the TEG in order to charge the phone. This type of
system can be used in third world countries to have efficient energy usage while
cooking.
presented in this paper. All possible combinations of 2 – TEG and 4 – TEG arrays
are investigated and the cause of intrinsic maximum power loss is analyzed for some
attached in series and mounted on the car engine. The results show a maximum
voltage of 2.05 V with a temperature difference of 17.8 degrees Celsius which was
generated when the engine starts up to a time range between 520 to 530 seconds.
The generated voltages and currents both rise linearly with respect to time, upon
reaching its maximum point, it slowly lowers down in value until it produces a
24
steady amount of voltage and current, this is because the thermoelectric generators’s
cold side have started to heat up and reach thermal equilibrium. This shows one
time.
material is heat conducting material is attached to its hot side. Three experimental
variations were done; one with no material attached, one with aluminum attached,
and one with graphene attached. The results showed that graphene yielded the
greatest power, with aluminum coming in second, while the experiment with no
heat conducting metal yielded the lowest power output. The tests were done by
simulation and in actuality by attaching a cooling fin to the cold side of the TEG to
keep it at a constant zero degrees while the hot side is exposed to ambient
temperature.
25
DAQ system and involves the construction of a system that attaches a heater into
the TEC and pumps water into the cold side of the TEC.
cells [7, 8]. Most studies regarding thermoelectric solar cells focus on designing
devices [9], and the improvement of solar absorption and temperature management
of the system [10]. However, the problem with thermoelectric solar cells is that
most of its researches use many complex materials and the lack of further research
and development.
improvised cooking systems include designing a biogas fueled kitchen system [11],
and implementing different cooling systems to increase stove efficiency [12]. Using
harvested energy. However, most of these studies require the construction of stoves
Existing
Techniques in
Description Results
characterizing
TEGS
Water Boiling Test Exposes the hot side of the A multimeter provides
boiling water.
Heating tape and Attaches a heating tape to Regulating water at the cold
water cooling [16] the hot side of the TEG side helps in increasing and
Existing
Techniques for
Description Results
Increasing
Thermoelectric
Solar Cell
Efficiency
materials.
attachment with cold side of the TEG and high temperature difference
water cooling. [14] implements a water cooling given that the hot side is
temperature.
the TEG.
28
conductivity.
Existing
Techniques for
Description Results
Increasing
Energy
Harvesting Stove
Efficiency
Conductivity thermal conductivity to the the hot side of the TEG and
Metals. hot side of the TEG. also protects the TEG from
damages.
METHODOLOGY
This chapter covers the research methodology that explains the research
Figure 3.1 shows the methodology flowchart which contains the flow of
process that is strictly followed which serves as a guide for the researchers in
achieving the objectives of the study. The first step requires conceptualizing the
design of the energy harvesting systems, as well as its different variations. Next,
various Solidworks simulations revolving TEGs are done in order to have a good
and efficient design on the energy harvesting system to be built. Then, the SP1848-
gathering and simulations, designing the two energy harvesting systems is done,
with building these systems following immediately after the designing phase. The
constructed Thermoelectric Solar Cell and the tin stove with attached TEG systems
is finally used, the Thermoelectric Solar Cell is exposed to sunlight while wood or
coal is burned inside the tin stove with attached TEG systems. During these working
DAQ system. The last part is storing energy into a battery using the harvested
energy from the two different systems and calculate the rate of the charging of the
Figure 3.2 shows the conceptualized system block for the energy harvesting
systems. The entire system is divided into 4 parts. The first part is the thermoelectric
generation where heat from solar energy or from the fire in the tin stove heats up
the hot side of the thermoelectric generators. The resulting temperature difference
produces an output power which is regulated using a boost converter. The regulated
power is then stored in a lithium ion battery for device usage where the output of
the battery is regulated using a boost converter again, making the output power of
its hot side and its cold side. The greater the heat difference, the greater the
is that the heat from the hot side of the TEG carries over into the cold side via
conduction, hence, increasing the temperature of the cold side and therefore,
lowering the TEG’s temperature difference and output energy. This is always the
case of TEGs since it obeys the zeroth law of thermodynamics where the hotter
object always transfer heat into the less hot object when both are in contact until
both objects are in thermal equilibrium, in this study’s case, the hotter object is the
hot side of the TEG and the colder object is the cold side of the TEG. Because of
this, TEG’s as of now have a limited operation time, which is the amount of time
when the temperature difference between the two sides of the TEG is large enough
to generate sufficient energy. There are many ways to compensate this type of
disadvantage of TEGs such as using a cooling system that flows into the cold side,
or using a simple fan to keep the cold side cooler. In this experiment a simple
aluminum heatsink is attached to the cold side of the TEG using thermal paste in
order to disperse the heat from the cold side into the atmosphere which allows for
the cold side to stay at a sufficiently lower temperature from the hot side for an
typically a metallic part which can be attached to a device releasing energy in the
form of heat, with the aim of dissipating that heat to a surrounding fluid in order to
Thermal paste is a very high heat conductive paste that is used between two
objects to get better heat conduction, one of which, is usually a heatsink. It fills in
all those microscopic imperfections on the heatsink and the other object that can
trap air in them and cause a loss in the heatsink’s performance as air is a very poor
conductor of heat.
35
a reference voltage source, an oscillator, and a comparator. The built-in MOS FET
is turned off by a protection circuit when the voltage at the LX pin exceeds the limit
to prevent it from being damaged. The input consists of two pins; one for positive,
and one for negative. The output of the CE8301 is a female USB port. The minimum
voltage required for the converter is 0.9 V and it boosts that voltage up to 5 V. It is
not safe or advisable to charge any device with a varying voltage input as it can
damage the device. In order to safely charge the lithium ion battery, the CE8301 dc
to dc boost converter is used for voltage regulation. Other than regulating the
voltage, the boost converter also increases the input voltage from the system into
the battery.
A 4.2 V lithium-ion battery is used to store the harvested energy from the
two systems. Lithium-ion batteries are suitable for this study because of their
advantages from other types of batteries. These advantages are that lithium-ion
batteries have higher energy densities than other common batteries allowing for
longer applications on devices and even though lithium ion batteries have high
energy densities, they still charge faster than other commercial batteries. Another
within the first few hours of being fully charged and falls down to about one to two
percent per month. More importantly, lithium ion batteries have low to zero
in which they lose their maximum energy capacity when repeated recharged after
being only partially discharged. This property of lithium ion batteries is very useful
in this study because the series of experiments requires the chosen battery to be
dimension, as aluminum is one of the most commercially available metal sheets that
has high thermal conductivity. An aluminum sheet, however, is glossy and reflects
sunlight, which makes it harder for the sheet to heat up. To compensate for this
characteristic of aluminum, the sheet is spray painted with black thin paint. The
color black is suitable for the solar cell application as it absorbs all wavelengths of
light, and therefore, heats up faster than other colors of the visible spectrum.
Thermal is be applied in between the hot side of the TEG and the aluminum sheet
to compensate for the microscopic gaps and air pockets in between. The paste alone
cannot hold the TEG in place to the surface of the aluminum sheet. Therefore, the
38
TEG array are attached in place with metal or plastic strips that are fastened tightly
into the aluminum sheet with nuts and bolt. An array containing 15 TEGs is suitable
TEG array distance variation is done using Solidworks. The TEGs undergo
temperature simulation and their distance from one another is be varied. This is to
find out whether a TEG Array where the TEGs are closely attached with each other
the TEGs are a few centimeters apart. In this simulation, space compactness of the
TEG Array is taken into consideration as well as the temperature stability of the
system. There are three variations done for this simulation. The first variation
between the TEGs, and the third simulates a 4 cm spacing in between the TEGs.a
In measuring the different parameters such as the open circuit voltage, and
output power of the TEG and the system, the Arduino Uno is used as a data
acquisition system. Two thermocouple modules are connected to the Arduino and
attached to the hot side and cold side of the TEG in order to obtain the temperature
difference. The TEG system output is also connected to the arduino in order to
shows the circuit diagram for measuring the voltage across a load. Analog pins
series resistor of 100 MΩ. The Arduino can accurately measure the voltage of a
voltage load because of the relatively large resistance across the nodes of the load
voltage. Arduino can only take a maximum input voltage of 5V at its analog pins;
a voltage divider with 1:1 ratio is configured to increase the voltage reading range
to 10V. Adjustments and calibrations for accurate data acquisition is done via the
Figure 3.9 is the circuit diagram for measuring the current across a load. The
relatively large resistance of the Arduino pin takes a negligible amount of current
41
from the load. Moreover, 1Ω is relatively small that it decreases the load current by
Module. The GND, VCC, SCK, CS, and SO pins of module 1 is connected to pin
6, pin 5, pin 4, pin 3 and pin 2, respectively, while for module 2, these module pins
are connected to pin 13, pin 12, pin 11, pin 10 and pin 9, respectively. The arduino
For the TEG characterization, a heat blower is used in order to heat up the
hot side of the thermoelectric generator. The thermocouples are then attached to the
hot side and the cold side of the TEG in order to obtain the temperature difference.
The TEG and the thermocouples are then attached to an Arduino Uno for data
acquisition. To measure the open circuit voltage, short circuit current, internal
resistance and power output characteristics of the TEG, the hot side of the device is
43
heated up by the blower while the temperature of the cold side is maintained by
and power are compared to the instantaneous temperature difference with respect
3.4.1 TEG and Heatsink efficiency variation for Thermoelectric Solar Cell
simulation. The second has a heatsink attached into the TEG. Lastly, the third
variation has the heatsink attached TEG to be submerged in a water coolant that is
contained in an insulating box, the water in this system is constantly flowing. In the
third variation, only the heatsink is submerged in water. These three variations are
the three different TEG and Heatsink designs, the variation which has the higher
and more stable temperature difference with respect to time is chosen for the final
Figure 3.11 shows the design for the thermoelectric solar cell. The
thermoelectric solar cell is placed on a Styrofoam box that acts as a water container.
A second Styrofoam box is placed at a lower elevation than the solar cell and
contains a water pump that pumps water via the blue hose into the first Styrofoam
box that acts as a water container for the solar cell. The water fills up the Styrofoam
water container and as it gets full, the water flows back into the Styrofoam box with
the water pump via two green hoses through gravity. This simulates flowing water
Upon simulating the 3 variations, the one with the water coolant yielded the
box is used as the container for the water supply and water pump as well as the
container for which the TEG array is placed on. Water hoses are then used to
The Tin Stove used in this study has the shape of a rectangular prism as it is
more convenient to attach the aluminum plate on a flat surface compared to a curved
one from a cylinder. A hole is cut at the lower part of one face of the stove, this is
where fuel such as firewood or coal is placed and burned to produce fire for cooking.
The TEG system is then attached to the opposite face of the hole where its aluminum
plate heats up via conduction and, in response, heat up the hot side of the TEG array.
For Variation, a mini heatsink fan is attached to the heatsink of the TEG that
is attached to the cold side of the TEG. The fan draws power from the TEG. The
output power is then be compared to the output of a TEG without a fan attached to
the heatsink. It is then be calculated whether attaching a fan that draws power from
the TEG has any significant effect on the output power that the TEG generates.
47
Upon experimenting with the fan attached and without the fan, it is shown
that there is no significant difference in the output power of the TEG between the 2
variations. Therefore, the Tin Stove prototype will be constructed without small
Figures 3.8 and 3.9 show the front and back view of the tin stove prototype,
respectively. The tin stove is made from vintage biscuit tin cans that has a hole cut
at the bottom to allow for coal or firewood to be placed. Some people, usually from
rural areas, use this type improvised stove to cook their food. The TEG array is then
𝑘𝐴∆𝑇
𝑞=
𝑑
Where:
𝑞 = 𝑘𝐴∆T
Where:
The equations for thermal conductivity and convection are nearly similar, with just
an addition of the thickness of the material (d) in the conduction equation. These
equations are used to calculate the rate of heat transfer in the two systems.
51
𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡
𝑛= ⋅ 100
𝑃𝑖𝑛
Where:
The thermal efficiency equation considers the input heat and output power
of the system. This equation is used to calculate the efficiency of the two systems.
CHAPTER 4
generators from solar heat source and heat from tin stove.
The initial tests of the conceptualized system uses a hair blower as a heat
source and is directed into the hot side of a thermoelectric generator. The test was
able to produce a voltage around the 1 V range but the temperature difference to
produce such voltage does not last long enough because the cold side of the TEG
such as a heatsink can help maintain a high temperature difference. The output
inconsistent voltage output is not safe when charging a battery or any electronic
voltage to a maximum of 5V and regulate it for safety. However, the output power
of a 4.2 V lithium ion battery is not enough to charge common electronic devices,
such as a cellphone, therefore attaching another boost converter to the output of the
battery is found to be necessary to raise its power output for it to be able to charge
53
common electronic devices. The results if this test provides useful information for
the design and construction of the thermoelectric solar cell and energy harvesting
tin stove.
Source Temperature, Ts 60 ℃
4.2a No Spacing
Figure 4.1 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
without spacing (isometric view).
Figure 4. 2 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
without spacing (side view).
55
Figure 4.3 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 2cm spacing (isometric view).
Figure 4.4 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 2cm spacing (side view).
56
Figure 4.5 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 4cm spacing (isometric view).
Figure 4.6 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 4cm spacing (side view).
57
4.1. Figures 4.1-6 show the thermal simulation results when the distance between
the TEG is varied by 0cm, 2cm, and 4cm. Results show that the temperature
difference measured for the three setup is 14.38℃, 15.14℃ and 15.18℃,
1.2
1
Voltage, V
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ˚C
0.25
0.2
Current, A
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ℃
Resistance
5
4.5
4
Internal Resistance, Ω
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ℃
Power Output
0.35
0.3
0.25
Power, W
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ℃
module with increasing temperature difference. Figures 4.7 and 4.8 shows that the
with temperature difference. Moreover, figure 4.9 shows that there is no significant
change in the internal resistance of the TEG module when the temperature is varied.
In figure 4.10, it can be observed that the power output of the device increases
drastically as the temperature difference between the hot side and cold side
increases.
61
This section discusses the effects of adding a heatsink to the cold side of the
TEG module.
4.4.1a No Heatsink
Source Temperature, Ts 60 ℃
Table 4.3 Simulation parameters for simulating the TEG module without heatsink.
62
Figure 4.11 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module without heatsink (isometric view).
Figure 4.12 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module without heatsink (side view).
63
without heatsink is summarized in Table 4.3. Figures 4.11 and 4.12 show the
simulation results of the steady state thermal analysis in isometric and side view,
respectively. Result summary in Table 4.4 shows that the average surface
temperature at the hot side of the TEG is 60℃, and the average surface temperature
difference between the hot side and the cold side of the TEG is 1.684℃.
Source Temperature, Ts 60 ℃
Figure 4.13 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink (isometric view).
Figure 4.14 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink (side view).
65
The simulation condition parameters for simulating the TEG module with
heatsink and free convection through air is summarized in Table 4.5. Figures 4.13
and 4.14 show the simulation results of the steady state thermal analysis in isometric
and side view, respectively. Result summary in Table 4.6 shows that the average
surface temperature at the hot side of the TEG is 60℃, and the average surface
temperature difference between the hot side and the cold side of the TEG is
11.281℃.
66
Source Temperature, Ts 60 ℃
Figure 4.15 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink and water coolant (isometric view).
67
Figure 4.16 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink and water coolant (side view).
The simulation condition parameters for simulating the TEG module with
heatsink and using water as a heat dispersion medium is summarized in Table 4.7.
Figures 4.15 and 4.16 show the simulation results of the steady state thermal
analysis in isometric and side view, respectively. Result summary in Table 4.8
shows that the average surface temperature at the hot side of the TEG is 60℃, and
the average surface temperature at the cold side is 36.467℃. As a result, the
simulated average temperature difference between the hot side and the cold side of
the TEG is 23.533℃. The results show that adding a heatsink with water coolant
Therefore, a setup with water coolant and heatsink is necessary to achieve optimal
Figure 4.17 shows the open circuit voltage of the single TEG module when
the hot side is exposed under the sun. The average voltage value for the duration is
around 0.128 V. The equivalent circuit diagram for the TEG in this setup is
0.16
y=0.1276
0.14
0.12
0.1
Voltage, V
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 10 20 30 time,40mins 50 60 70 80
Figure 4.17 Open circuit voltage of a single TEG module for solar energy
harvesting.
Figure 4.18 Equivalent circuit for the TEG for solar energy harvesting.
70
1.5
Voltage, V
0.5
0
9:00:00 AM 10:48:00 AM 12:36:00 PM 2:24:00 PM 4:12:00 PM
Time
Figure 4.19 shows the open circuit voltage response of the 15-TEG in series
system when the hot-side aluminum plate is exposed under the sun. The duration of
the experiment covers from 9:53 AM to 3:13 PM, a total of 5.33 hours.
Power Output
0.35
0.3
0.25
Power, W
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ℃
power output and temperature difference between the hot side and the cold side of
the device. The graph shows that the maximum power output increases in an
at maximum.
72
Figure 4.22 shows the voltage response of the CE8301 Boost Converter at
its output with respect to the open circuit voltage of the 15-TEG system. The open
circuit voltage required for the boost converter to produce a regulated 5V output is
0.97 V. Moreover, Figure 4.23 shows the power output response of the CE8301
boost converter as a function of the open circuit voltage of the 15-TEG system. The
Output Voltage
6.0
5.0
4.0
Voltage, V
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Voltage, V
Figure 4.22 Voltage output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output.
73
Power Output
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
Power, W
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Voltage, V
Figure 4.23 Power output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output
74
y=0.470
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time, min
Power
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
-0.05
4.25 shows the power consumption of the fan with respect to the voltage input. The
Figure 4.26 shows the changes in voltage output of the TEG when the fan is
introduced. The orange-colored curve describes the response of the TEG when the
fan is not present, the black-colored curve is the voltage response of the TEG when
the fan is turned on, and the dashed-blue line is the projected curve if the fan was
not turned on. The curve is described by the equation y = 508.04x-0.879. The average
is 6.78 mW. Considering the assumption that the battery voltage is maintained at
4.2 voltage, the power consumption of the fan 259.41 mW. As a result, adding an
external dc fan to increase the power output of the TEG yields a net increase in
power of -252.63 mW. Thus, the fan acts as a degenerative component for the
ΔVave,increase 0.161 V
ΔPave.increase 6.78 mW
Pfan 259.41 mW
ΔPnet -252.63 mW
Voltage Output
1.4
1.2
1
Voltage, V
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Time, s
Estimated
Fan is Off Voltage Fan is On
Figure 4.27 shows the open circuit voltage of the 15-TEG array in series-
parallel combination used for the energy harvesting from the heat of the tin stove.
Moreover, Figure 4.28 is the characterization of the 15-TEG system comparing the
power output as a function of temperature difference between the hot side and cold
side. Figure 4.29 shows the voltage response of the CE8301 Boost Converter at its
output with respect to the open circuit voltage of the 15-TEG system. The open
circuit voltage required for the boost converter to produce a regulated 5V output is
0.56 V. Figure 4.30 shows the power output response of the CE8301 boost converter
78
as a function of the open circuit voltage of the 15-TEG system. The power output
Voltage
3
2.5
2
Voltage, V
1.5
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
-0.5
Time, mins
Power Output
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
Power, W
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Temperature Difference, ˚C
Output Voltage
6.0
5.0
4.0
Voltage, V
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Voltage, V
Figure 4. 29 Voltage output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output.
80
Max Power
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
Voltage, V
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Voltage, V
Figure 4.30 Power output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output.
The input heat is measured as the rate of heat transfer from the hot side to
the cold side of the thermoelectric module. The TEG is a composite of three
materials which includes Alumina, solder, and Bismuth Telluride. The thermal
resistivity of the device is added in series for composite materials like TEG. The
𝐿1 𝐿2 𝐿3 −1
𝑞=[ + + ] (∆𝑇)
𝑘1 𝐴1 𝑘2 𝐴2 𝑘3 𝐴3
where,
81
ΔT = temperature difference between the hot side and cold side (K)
Thermal
Material Thickness, mm Area, m2
Conductivity
Soldering
0.32 0.000913 57
Material
150
Power, W
0.15
100
0.1
0.05 50
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ˚C
Efficiency is the measure of the power output divided by the rate of heat
transfer, q, from the hot side to the cold side of the TEG. Using the equation of the
conductive heat transfer for composite objects and the material properties in Table
10, the efficiency can be estimated. Figures 4.32 and 4.33 show the efficiency of
the 15-TEG in series for solar energy harvesting and 15-TEG in series-parallel for
heat energy harvesting from tin stove. The maximum efficiency recorded from solar
energy harvesting is 0.257%, while from the heat from tin stove is 0.67%. This
efficiency values is the efficiency at the output of the TEG-system array only.
83
Power, W
0.2 60
0.15 40
0.1 20
0.05 0
0 -20
9:36:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 2:24:00 PM
Time
Figure 4.32 Heat input and efficiency of the TEG array for solar energy
harvesting application.
40
Power, W
0.4 30
20
0.2
10
0
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
-0.2 -10
Time, min
Power In
Figure 4.33 Heat input and efficiency of the TEG array for energy harvesting in tin
stove.
84
Taken from the datasheet of the CE8301 Boost Converter, figure 4.34 shows
the efficiency of the device and the corresponding output current as response to the
specific voltage inputs. The typical efficiency of the boost converter is around 85%.
85
where 𝜂𝑇𝐸𝐺 is the efficiency of the array of TEGs and 𝜂𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑡 is the efficiency of the
boost converter.
𝜂𝑇𝐸𝐺|𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟 0.29%
𝜂𝑇𝐸𝐺|𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑣𝑒 0.67%
𝜂𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑡 85%
𝜼𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍|𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒂𝒓 0.25%
𝜼𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍|𝑺𝒕𝒐𝒗𝒆 0.57%
0.25% and 0.57% for solar energy harvesting and from the heat of the tin stove,
respectively.
86
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Time, mins
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Time, mins
For charging the mobile phone with a 3000 mAh battery, the output of the
4.31 shows the level of battery percentage with respect to charging time. At time =
0 min, the initial battery level of the mobile phone is 39%. The final charging time
is 220 min, and the battery level percentage of the mobile phone is 91%. The total
increase in battery level percentage is 52%. Figure 4.36 shows the voltage level of
the lithium-ion battery with respect to charging time. The initial voltage of the
battery at time = 0 min is 4.183V. After 220 min of charging, the voltage of the
battery dropped to 3.245 V. At this level, the battery can no longer provide the
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Time, mins
Figure 4.37 Effective battery voltage as a function of charging time (solar cell).
88
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time, mins
Figure 4.38 Effective battery voltage as a function of charging time (tin stove).
Figures 4.37 and 4.38 shows the voltage level of the battery when charged
by the solar energy harvesting and heat from tin stove, respectively. It takes around
3 hours to charge the battery from 3.17V to 4.2V from the solar energy harvesting
system, and around 40 minutes of charging to increase the battery voltage from 3.25
5.1 Conlcusion
number of TEG modules, the temperature difference between the hot side and cold
side of the TEG module, and the type of connection of the array.
is concluded that the TEG array for a thermoelectric solar cell should connected in
series to effectively increase its open circuit voltage of the system, however, the
effective internal resistance of the system increases linearly with the number of
solar energy and stores it in a lithium battery at a rate of 1.03V in 3 hours and the
using thermoelectric generators. It is concluded that the TEG array attached to the
from a tin stove system can lead to a large amount of output voltage from the TEG.
resistance of the system and in return, limits the open circuit voltage of the system.
The constructed Tin Stove successfully harvests waste heat energy and stores it in
a lithium battery at a rate of 0.95 V in 40 mins and the system’s different parameters
system and the connectivity of its array in order to achieve efficient performance.
The drawback of using TEG modules for energy harvesting is relatively high
internal resistance. Consequently, the maximum power that can be outputted by the
device is limited due to this factor. The collected data shows that there is no
significant change in the internal resistance of the system with respect to increasing
5.2 Recommendations
1. Improve the heat dispersion method by using a heatsink with larger fins.
This increases the surface area for either convective or conductive heat
transfer.
3. Consider using a TEG module other than the TEG SP1848-27145 that yields
4. Use expensive thermal paste with lower thermal resistance and make sure
Issues”, 2013
https://www.marlow.com/how-do-thermoelectric-generators-tegs-
work
http://www.alphabetenergy.com/how-thermoelectrics-work/
Work?”,2017
Industry”, 2011
96
Prototype”, 2013
Educational Background:
Work Experience
On-the-Job Training: PLDT-PHILCOM
Cagayan de Oro City
June – August 2017
98
AFFILIATIONS