Sunteți pe pagina 1din 114

ENERGY HARVESTING CAPABILITIES OF THERMOELECTRIC

GENERATOR SP1848-27145 IMPLEMENTED THROUGH

SOLAR CELLS AND TIN STOVES

AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS

Presented to the Faculty of


Department of Electrical Engineering and Technology
College of Engineering and Technology
Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology
Iligan City

In Partial Fulfillment of the subject


of the Requirements of the degree of
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING

BIENVENIDO H. LASACA, JR.

ROVIC JAN RAFAEL L. ROA

DR. OLGA JOY L. GERASTA

Thesis Adviser

May 2019
ii

APPROVAL SHEET

The undergraduate thesis attached hereto, entitled “ENERGY


HARVESTING CAPABILITIES OF THERMOELECTRIC GENERATOR
SP1848-27145 IMPLEMENTED THROUGH SOLAR CELLS AND TIN
STOVES”, prepared and submitted by Bienvenido H. Lasaca, Jr. and Rovic Jan
Rafael L. Roa in partial fulfillment for the degree of BACHELOR OF SCIENCE
IN ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING, is hereby recommended for approval.

PROF. JENNIBETH F. GATAL PROF. ANGILINE L. TEATRO

Member Member

____________________ ____________________

Date Date

PROF. OLGA JOY L. GERASTA

Adviser

____________________

Date

This undergraduate thesis is approved in partial fulfillment of the


requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN ELECTRONICS
ENGINEERING.

PROF. ALLENN C. LOWATON ATTY. EDGAR ALAN A. DONASCO

Chairman, Department of Electrical Dean, College of Engineering & Technology

Engineering and Technology

____________________ ____________________

Date Date
iii

ABSTRACT

Presented in this paper is the characterization of the energy harvesting

capabilities of the thermoelectric generator model SP1848-27145 and its

implementation in thermoelectric solar cells and modified tin stoves. The two

systems consist of an array of 15 TEGs attached to a piece of aluminum plate of

which the thermoelectric solar cell harvests solar energy while the modified tin

stove harvests heat energy. Different system variations were simulated and tested

to achieve optimal system designs. System simulations were done using Solidworks

and data gathering was done using the Arduino Uno microcontroller. The SP1848-

27145 TEG exhibits an output power of up to 300 mW at a temperature difference

of 35°C with an average internal resistance of 3.7 Ω which is constant regardless of

temperature difference. The thermoelectric solar cell’s TEG array is connected in

series and exhibits an output power of up to 300 mW at a temperature difference of

35°C, an internal resistance of 69 Ω, an efficiency of 0.25%, and was able to charge

a 4.2V lithium-ion battery from minimum voltage to maximum in 3 hours. The

modified tin stove’s TEG array is connected in series-parallel and exhibits an output

power of up to 700 mW at a temperature difference of 60°C, an internal resistance

of 15 Ω, an efficiency of 0.57%, and was able to charge the same battery from

minimum voltage to maximum in 40 minutes. The study shows that the SP1848-

27145 TEG can be used in energy harvesting systems with acceptable results.
iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
v
vi

Table of Contents

APPROVAL SHEET .............................................................................................ii

ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................... iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................... iv

Table of Contents .................................................................................................. vi

List of Figures ........................................................................................................ xi

List of Tables ........................................................................................................ xv

CHAPTER 1 ........................................................................................................... 1

INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Background of the Study ........................................................................ 1

1.2 Statement of the Problem ....................................................................... 2

1.3 Objectives of the Study ........................................................................... 2

1.4 Significance of the Study......................................................................... 3

1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Study ....................................................... 4

1.6 Definition of Terms ................................................................................. 5

1.7 Theoretical Framework .......................................................................... 7

1.7.1 Seebeck Effect................................................................................... 7

1.7.2 Thermoelectric Generator .................................................................... 8

1.7.3 Thermocouple ........................................................................................ 9

1.7.4 MAX6675 Thermocouple Module ........................................................ 9

1.7.5 Arduino UNO ....................................................................................... 10

1.7.6 DC to DC Boost Converter ................................................................ 11

1.7.7 Thermal Paste ...................................................................................... 11


vii

1.7.8 Solidworks ............................................................................................ 12

1.7.9 Thermal Conduction Equation........................................................... 12

1.7.10 Thermal Convection Equation ......................................................... 13

1.7.11 Thermal Efficiency Equation ........................................................... 14

CHAPTER 2 ......................................................................................................... 16

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ........................................................ 16

2.1 Sustainable Energy and Efficient Energy Utilization ............................. 16

2.1.1 Analytical Research on Waste Heat Recovery and Utilization of


China’s Iron & Steel Industry ..................................................................... 16

2.1.2 Sustainable Energy Solutions for Rural Areas and Application for
Groundwater Extraction .............................................................................. 17

2.2 Thermoelectric Solar Cell Related Literature ......................................... 17

2.2.1 Solar Hybrid Systems With Thermoelectric Generators ................. 17

2.2.2 A High-Temperature, High-Efficiency Solar Thermoelectric


Generator Prototype..................................................................................... 18

2.2.3 High-Performance Flat-Panel Solar Thermoelectric Generators


With High Thermal Concentration............................................................. 19

2.3 TEG Attached Tin Stove Related Literature ........................................... 20

2.3.1 Improvement of Biogas Fuelled-off-Grid Thermoelectric


Microcogeneration Kitchen System ............................................................ 20

2.3.2 Conversion of Wasted Heat Energy into Electrical Energy Using


TEG ................................................................................................................ 21

2.2 Thermoelectric Generators ....................................................................... 23

2.2.2 Analysis of a Reconfigurable TEG Array for High Efficiency


Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting ............................................................. 23

2.2.3 Experimental Study: Design of Thermoelectric Generator (TEG)


Fixture for Harvesting an Automobile Electricity..................................... 23
viii

2.2.4 The Thermoelectric Analysis of Different Heat Flux Conduction


Materials for Power Generation Board ...................................................... 24

2.2.5 Power and efficiency measurement of a thermoelectric cooler . 25

2.3 Literature summary ................................................................................... 25

CHAPTER 3 ......................................................................................................... 30

METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................. 30

3.1 Conceptualized Energy Harvesting System ............................................. 32

3.1.1 Thermoelectric Generator Efficiency Improvement ........................ 33

3.1.2 CE8301 Boost Converter and Charging Technique ......................... 35

3.1.4 Lithium-ion battery ............................................................................. 36

3.1.5 TEG Board Design............................................................................... 37

3.1.6 TEG Array Distance Variation .......................................................... 39

3.2 Measuring Techniques using Arduino ................................................ 39

3.2.1 Voltage and Current Measurement ............................................. 40

3.2.2 Temperature Measurement .......................................................... 41

3.3 TEG Characterization ............................................................................... 42

3.4 Thermoelectric Solar Cell Design ............................................................. 43

3.4.1 TEG and Heatsink efficiency variation for Thermoelectric Solar Cell
........................................................................................................................ 43

3.4.2 Thermoelectric Solar Cell ................................................................... 45

3.5 Tin Stove Design ......................................................................................... 46

3.5.1 Tin Stove Modification and TEG array Attachment ....................... 46

3.5.2 Tin Stove TEG Fan Attachment......................................................... 46

3.5.3 Tin Stove Prototype ............................................................................. 47


ix

3.6 Equations Used ........................................................................................... 49

3.6.1 Thermal Conductivity and Thermal Convection Equation ............. 49

3.6.2 Thermal Efficiency Equation ............................................................. 51

CHAPTER 4 ......................................................................................................... 52

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .......................................................................... 52

4.1 Conceptualized Energy Harvesting System Initial Test Results ............ 52

4.2 Effects of Varying the Distance between TEG modules ......................... 53

4.2a No Spacing ............................................................................................. 54

4.2b 2cm Spacing .......................................................................................... 55

4.2c 4cm Spacing ........................................................................................... 56

4.3 SP1848-27145 TEG Characterization ................................................. 58

4.4 Performance of Thermoelectric Solar Cell ......................................... 61

4.4.1 Thermal Analysis Simulation Results of Thermoelectric Solar


Cell 61

4.4.2 Single TEG Module Performance for Thermoelectric Solar Cell


68

4.4.3 Array of 15 TEG Module in Series for Thermoelectric Solar Cell


70

4.5 Performance of TEG Array Attached in Tin Stove ........................... 74

4.5.1 Single TEG Performance with Heatsink attached in Tin Stove 74

4.5.3 Array of 15 TEG Module in Series-Parallel Combination


attached in Tin Stove ................................................................................... 77

4.6 Efficiency calculation ............................................................................ 80

4.6.1 Efficiency of the Array of 15 TEGs .............................................. 82

4.6.2 Efficiency of the CE8301 Boost Converter .................................. 84


x

4.6.3 System Overall Efficiency ............................................................. 85

4.7 Energy Harvesting and Storing ........................................................... 86

CHAPTER 5 ......................................................................................................... 89

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................... 89

5.1 Conlcusion ................................................................................................... 89

5.2 Recommendations ...................................................................................... 91

CURRICULUM VITAE...................................................................................... 97
xi

List of Figures

Figure 1. 1 Thermoelectric Generator Design ......................................................... 8

Figure 1.2 MAX6675 Thermocouple Module ....................................................... 10

Figure 1.3 Arduino Uno board ............................................................................... 11

Figure 2.1 High Efficiency STEG Prototype ......................................................... 19

Figure 2.2 flat panel STEG prototype .................................................................... 20

Figure 2.3 Gas Stove Burner with TEG and Heatsink Configuration ................... 21

Figure 2.4 Phone Charging Gas Stove Burner with TEG ...................................... 22

Figure 3.1 Methodology Flowchart ....................................................................... 30

Figure 3.2 System Block ........................................................................................ 32

Figure 3.3 Aluminum Heatsink.............................................................................. 34

Figure 3.4 CE8301 Series Boost Converter ........................................................... 35

Figure 3.5Sony 4.2V VTC5 Lithium-ion Battery .................................................. 37

Figure 3.6 Conceptualized TEG Array Board ....................................................... 38

Figure 3.7Side View of the Conceptualized TEG Array Board ............................ 38

Figure 3.8 Voltage Measurement Circuit............................................................... 40

Figure 3.9 Current Measurement Circuit Diagram ................................................ 41

Figure 3.10 Thermocouple Pin Configuration ....................................................... 42

Figure 3.11 Thermoelectric Solar Cell Design Top View ..................................... 44

Figure 3.12 Thermoelectric Solar Cell Prototype .................................................. 45

Figure 3.13 Small Heatsink Fan............................................................................. 47

Figure 3.14 Tin Stove Prototype front view .......................................................... 47

Figure 3.15 Tin Stove Prototype back view........................................................... 48


xii

Figure 4.1 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
without spacing (isometric view). .......................................................................... 54

Figure 4. 2 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
without spacing (side view). .................................................................................. 54

Figure 4.3 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 2cm spacing (isometric view). ....................................................................... 55

Figure 4.4 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 2cm spacing (side view). ............................................................................... 55

Figure 4.5 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 4cm spacing (isometric view). ....................................................................... 56

Figure 4.6 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 4cm spacing (side view). ............................................................................... 56

Figure 4.7 Voltage response of the TEG module as a function of temperature


difference. .............................................................................................................. 58

Figure 4.8 Current response of the TEG module as a function of temperature


difference. .............................................................................................................. 59

Figure 4.9 Internal resistance of the TEG module as a function of temperature


difference. .............................................................................................................. 59

Figure 4.10 Maximum power output of the TEG as a function of temperature


difference. .............................................................................................................. 60

Figure 4.11 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module without heatsink (isometric view). ............................................................ 62

Figure 4.12 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module without heatsink (side view). .................................................................... 62

Figure 4.13 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink (isometric view). ................................................................. 64

Figure 4.14 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink (side view). ......................................................................... 64
xiii

Figure 4.15 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink and water coolant (isometric view). ................................... 66

Figure 4.16 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink and water coolant (side view). ............................................ 67

Figure 4.17 Open circuit voltage of a single TEG module for solar energy
harvesting. .............................................................................................................. 69

Figure 4.18 Equivalent circuit for the TEG for solar energy harvesting. .............. 69

Figure 4.19 Open circuit voltage of 15 TEG in series ........................................... 70

Figure 4.20 Equivalent circuit for the 15 TEG array in series. .............................. 70

Figure 4.21 Power output of the 15 TEG in series as a function of temperature


difference. .............................................................................................................. 71

Figure 4.22 Voltage output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output......................................................................................................... 72

Figure 4.23 Power output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output......................................................................................................... 73

Figure 4.24 Open circuit voltage of a single TEG module .................................... 74

Figure 4.25 Power output consumption of the dc fan. ........................................... 75

Figure 4.26 Voltage variation when a dc fan is introduced. .................................. 77

Figure 4.27 Open circuit voltage of a 15 TEGs in series-parallel configuration. .. 78

Figure 4.28 Power output of the 15 TEGs in series-parallel as a function of


temperature difference. .......................................................................................... 79

Figure 4. 29 Voltage output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output......................................................................................................... 79

Figure 4.30 Power output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output......................................................................................................... 80

Figure 4.31 Efficiency of the TEG array as a function of temperature difference.82

Figure 4.32 Heat input and efficiency of the TEG array for solar energy harvesting
application. ............................................................................................................. 83
xiv

Figure 4.33 Heat input and efficiency of the TEG array for energy harvesting in tin
stove. ...................................................................................................................... 83

Figure 4.34 Efficiency of the CE8301 boost converter. ........................................ 84

Figure 4.35 Phone battery percentage with respect to charging time .................... 86

Figure 4.36 Battery voltage level with respect to charging time. .......................... 86

Figure 4.37 Effective battery voltage as a function of charging time (solar cell). 87

Figure 4.38 Effective battery voltage as a function of charging time (tin stove). . 88
xv

List of Tables

Table 2. 1 Summary of Existting Techniques in Characterizing TEG .................. 26

Table 2. 2 Existing Techniques for Increasing Thermoelectric Solar Cell Efficiency


................................................................................................................................ 28

Table 2. 3 Existing Techniques for Increasing Energy Harvesting Stove Efficiency


................................................................................................................................ 29

Table 4.1 Simulation parameters for TEG module ................................................ 53

Table 4.2 Simulation Summary ............................................................................. 57

Table 4.3 Simulation parameters for simulating the TEG module without heatsink.
................................................................................................................................ 61

Table 4.4 Simulation summary for the TEG without heatsink. ............................. 63

Table 4.5 Simulation parameters for simulating the TEG module. ....................... 63

Table 4.6 Simulation summary .............................................................................. 65

Table 4.7 Simulation parameters for TEG module ................................................ 66

Table 4. 8 Simulation summary ............................................................................. 67

Table 4.9 Result summary when adding a fan ....................................................... 76

Table 4.10 Summary of the material properties of a TEG. .................................... 81

Table 4. 11 Summary of Efficiency ....................................................................... 85


CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

Energy has become a necessity in our day to day lives and is an important

aspect in the development of technology. However, throughout the years, the

misuse of energy sources has led to different energy related problems such as energy

shortages, and pollution [1]. This has led researchers to start studying about energy

harvesting from renewable energy sources and waste heat. One type of energy

harvesting technology is the thermoelectric generator (TEG).

TEGs are devices that convert a temperature difference into electricity [2,

3]. Some of the current researches about TEGs include applying them on different

waste heat sources such as car engine [4], the effects on TEG efficiency when

attaching to different heat conducting metals [5], and the effects of varying TEG

Arrays connection [6]. However, these researches use high end TEGs that have a

relatively high cost, personalized or under proprietorship. Also, TEGs are still at its

early stage of development with little information known regarding its energy

harvesting characteristics. With the proper characterization of TEG as energy

harvesting, it can provide information for its development and its implementation

on various energy harvesting systems, such as thermoelectric solar cells for

renewable energy sources and energy harvesting tin stoves for waste heat

utilization.
2

1.2 Statement of the Problem

Due to the lack of reliable knowledge regarding the energy harvesting

characteristics of the TEG, it is difficult for researchers to efficiently utilize and

implement them on different energy harvesting systems. This study aims to provide

reliable knowledge on the energy harvesting capabilities of TEGs through the

characterization of the SP1848-27145 TEG, an accessible and low cost TEG, and

constructing thermoelectric solar cells and energy harvesting tin stoves with it.

1.3 Objectives of the Study

The general objective of the study is to be able to harvest energy from solar

radiation and heat from tin stove into electrical energy using thermoelectric

generators. Specifically, this study aims to:

1. To characterize the energy harvesting capabilities of the TEG SP1848-

27145 thermoelectric generator.

2. To be able to use the TEG SP1848-27145 to design and construct a

Thermoelectric Solar Cell that harvests solar energy.

3. To be able to use the TEG SP1848-27145 to design and construct a

modified tin stove that harvests waste heat energy.


3

4. To analyze different parameters of the two setups such as efficiency,

open circuit voltage, and power produced through time.

5. To be able to store the harvested energy from the two systems.

1.4 Significance of the Study

The data from this study regarding TEGs will help contribute to the early

stages of of small sized devices that can then be used for energy harvesting systems.

These systems can be applied in industries, such as the waste heat recovery of heat

engines in boiler or production rooms, the energy efficiency improvement of

manufactured devices, the manufacturing of new technology that utilizes TEGs, and

even the manufacturing of new models of TEGs that are easily obtainable and have

defined characteristics.

The designed thermoelectric solar cell in this study can be utilized by

everyone in their homes, especially in places that have very hot sunlight radiation

which can be used as a small alternative source of energy.

The designed energy harvesting tin stove in this study can help people in

rural areas that have low energy distribution as an extra source of energy.

Specifically, this study will help further researches regarding the

improvement of the efficiencies of TEGs and their possible future application in


4

thermoelectric solar cells and energy harvesting tin stoves that helps in renewable

energy usage and waste heat utilization.

1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Study

The scope and limitations of the study are the following:

1. The TEG SP1848-27145 is used in this study as it is the most commercially

available type of thermoelectric generator.

2. The analysis of the system is limited to the time it takes for the TEG to stop

generating electricity due to the cold side’s temperature becoming the same

as the hot side.

3. The TEG solar cell system’s functionality is limited to the amount of

sunlight during experimentation and the temperature that it produces.

4. The improvement of a TEG’s efficiency is not part of the scope of this study.
5

1.6 Definition of Terms

The following terms listed below are conceptually defined so that the

readers will understand what is meant when certain key terms are used. The terms

will be extensively used in the succeeding chapters.

Energy Harvesting – Energy harvesting, also known as power harvesting or

energy scavenging, is the process in which energy is captured from a system's

environment and converted into usable electric power. Energy harvesting allows

electronics to operate where there's no conventional power source, eliminating

the need to run wires or make frequent visits to replace batteries. An energy

harvesting system generally includes circuitry to charge an energy storage cell,

and manage the power, providing regulation and protection.

Solar Energy – The energy that radiates from the Sun. The Sun is like a massive

nuclear reactor from which deep in its core, nuclear fusion reaction produce

massive amounts of energy that radiates outward in the form of light and heat.

Thermoelectric Generator or TEG – Any of a class of solid-state devices that

convert heat directly into electricity. Such devices are based on thermoelectric

effects involving interactions between the flow of heat and of electricity through

solid bodies using a phenomenon called the Seebeck effect.


6

Data Acquisition or DAQ – Data acquisition (DAQ) is the process of

measuring an electrical or physical phenomenon such as voltage, current,

temperature, pressure, or sound with a computer.

Data Acquisition System or DAQ system – A DAQ system consists of

sensors, DAQ measurement hardware, and a computer with programmable

software. Compared to traditional measurement systems, PC-based DAQ

systems exploit the processing power, productivity, display, and connectivity

capabilities of industry-standard computers providing a more powerful, flexible,

and cost-effective measurement solution.

Microcontroller – A microcontroller is a compact integrated circuit designed

to govern a specific operation in an embedded system. A typical microcontroller

includes a processor, memory and input/output (I/O) peripherals on a single

chip.

TEG Array – the connection of multiple thermoelectric generators to yield a

greater energy output.

Boost – The word boost in this study is used to describe the amplification of

voltage, specifically, the voltage that the TEG array generates for it to be high

enough for it to be able to be utilized.


7

Renewable Energy - energy that is produced by natural resources such as

sunlight, wind, rain, waves, tides, and geothermal heat—that are naturally

replenished within a time span of a few years.

1.7 Theoretical Framework

The following sections explain the theories and concept behind the

operations used in the study.

1.7.1 Seebeck Effect

The Seebeck effect is a phenomenon in which a temperature difference

between two dissimilar electrical conductors or semiconductors produces a voltage

difference between the two substances. Current is produced when the two dissimilar

electric conductors have a high enough temperature difference. If the hot and cold

junctions of the semiconductors are interchanged, the flow of the current reverses.

The Seebeck Effect is the basis of most thermoelectric devices.


8

1.7.2 Thermoelectric Generator

Thermoelectric Generator (TEG), also called as Seebeck generator, is a

device that converts temperature difference directly into electrical energy by

making use of the Seebeck Effect. Moreover, thermoelectric generators are solid –

state heat engines made of pairs of p-type and n-type elements. The p-type elements

are made of semiconductor materials doped such that the charge carriers are positive

or the holes and the Seebeck coefficient is positive. On the other hand, the n- type

elements are made of semiconductor material doped such that the charge carriers

are negative (electrons) and Seebeck coefficient is negative.

Figure 1. 1 Thermoelectric Generator Design

Figure 1.1 shows a basic thermoelectric generator design. The N-type

element contains negatively charged carriers, while the P-type element contains

positively charged carriers. Heating the hot side of the TEG will excite the electrons

and holes and cause them to travel towards the colder side of the TEG, as heat
9

always travels from the hotter part into the colder part. The greater the temperature

the difference from between the hot side and the cold side, the more excited the

carriers become. Wires are then attached to the cold side of the TEG where the

excited carriers flow into the wires, generating a current in the wires which can be

used as a source of energy. This is the Seebeck Effect at work.

1.7.3 Thermocouple

A thermocouple is a sensor used to measure temperature. Thermocouples

are made with two wires of different metals, joined together at one end to form a

junction. The junction is placed on the surface or in the environment that's being

measured. As the temperature changes, the two dissimilar metals begin to deform,

causing a change in resistance. Naturally, a thermocouple outputs a millivolt signal,

therefore, as the resistance changes, the change in voltage can be measured.

Thermocouples are desirable because they're extremely low cost, simple to use, and

are capable of providing accurate readings.

1.7.4 MAX6675 Thermocouple Module

The MAX6675 is a module for the Arduino Uno. The device measures the

output of a K Thermocouple and provides the result to the Arduino via a SPI
10

interface. It has a small end point making it suitable to measure temperatures in the

surfaces of small systems.

Figure 1.2 MAX6675 Thermocouple Module

1.7.5 Arduino UNO

The Arduino Uno board is a common microcontroller used in various

engineering projects because of its ease to use and flexibility in doing different

tasks. It has 14 digital input/output pins in which 6 can be used as PWM outputs, a

16 MHz ceramic resonator, an ICSP header, a USB connection, 6 analog inputs, a

power jack and a reset button. This contains all the required support needed for

microcontroller. The Arduino Uno can be started by connecting it to a computer via

USB cable, with an AC-to-DC adapter, or with a battery. Because of its features,

the Arduino Uno can be used for Data Acquisition.


11

Figure 1.3 Arduino Uno board

1.7.6 DC to DC Boost Converter

The boost converter is a type of DC-to-DC converter that has an output

voltage magnitude that is greater than the input voltage magnitude. It amplifies the

input voltage up to a certain threshold voltage depending on the capabilities of the

boost converter.

1.7.7 Thermal Paste

Thermal paste is a very high heat conductive paste that is used between two

objects to get better heat conduction. It fills in all those microscopic imperfections

in between two objects that can trap air in them and cause a loss in the heatsink’s

performance. Air is a very poor conductor of heat.


12

1.7.8 Solidworks

SolidWorks is solid modelling software that allows you to design products

in 3 dimensions. The technique is generally to sketch 2D profiles then use methods

like extruding and lofting to produce the solid shape. It is used in various

engineering fields for many useful purposes such as 2D printing, 3D printing, 3D

modelling, and running various simulations on different objects or systems.

1.7.9 Thermal Conduction Equation

Thermal conduction is the transfer of internal thermal energy by the

collisions of microscopic particles and movement of electrons within a body. The

microscopic particles in the heat conduction can be molecules, atoms, and

electrons.

𝑘𝐴∆𝑇
𝑞=
𝑑

Equation. 1.1 Thermal conduction equation

Where:
13

q = rate of heat transfer (W)

k = thermal conductivity of the material (W/m2K)

A = cross sectional area of the material (m2)

∆T = temperature difference between two sides of the material

d = thickness of the material (m)

1.7.10 Thermal Convection Equation

Convection is heat transfer by mass motion of a fluid such as air or water

when the heated fluid is caused to move away from the source of heat, carrying

energy with it.

𝑞 = 𝑘𝐴∆T

Equation 1.2 Thermal convection equation

Where:

q = rate of heat transfer (W)


14

k = thermal conductivity of the material (W/m2K)

A = exposed surface area of the material (m2)

∆T = temperature difference between the object and the convecting fluid

1.7.11 Thermal Efficiency Equation

Thermal efficiency is defined for engines and devices which are used to

convert energy in the form of heat to work.

𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡
𝑛= ⋅ 100
𝑃𝑖𝑛

Equation 1.3 Thermal efficiency equation

Where:

n = efficiency in percentage (%)

Pout = output power (W)

Pin = input power (W)


15

Following the first law of thermodynamics which states that energy cannot

be created nor destroyed, thermal efficiency cannot be equal or exceed 100%

because in any system there are always inefficiencies usually in the form of friction

and waste heat.


CHAPTER 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

The terms listed below were used in the research are conceptually and

operationally defined for better understanding of the readers.

2.1 Sustainable Energy and Efficient Energy Utilization

2.1.1 Analytical Research on Waste Heat Recovery and Utilization of China’s

Iron & Steel Industry [13]

A study centered around the increasing energy crisis and energy

consumption problem in China’s iron and steel industry with a focus on recovering

waste heat to solve the problem. The study concludes with confirmation that the

waste heat produced in China’s iron and steel industry has not been used and is a

key point in solving energy efficiency problems in the future. The study also stated

that although waste heat recovery technology is important for efficient handling of

energy, more research and development is required in order for the technology to

have great impact in the world of energy production and energy by-product.
17

2.1.2 Sustainable Energy Solutions for Rural Areas and Application for

Groundwater Extraction [8]

This book by Fong states that the Sun can easily provide a more than

sufficient amount of energy to meet the worldwide energy demand. However, due

to technological limitations in research and development regarding solar energy

harvesting, the technology still has a long way to progress in order to be sufficiently

useful alternative for most energy sources.

This book also states the advantages of solar energy harvesting systems.

Which is that solar energy harvesting systems have low operating costs, low

maintenance requirement, has high life expectancy and is environment friendly. The

disadvantages, however, are high initial costs, topography, and weather.

2.2 Thermoelectric Solar Cell Related Literature

2.2.1 Solar Hybrid Systems With Thermoelectric Generators [9]

In this study, the possibility of using thermoelectric generators in solar

hybrid systems is investigated. Four different variations were done. One variation

doesn’t include a radiation concentrator from a PV system where the TEG is placed

between the solar cell and heat extractor, while the other three included the
18

concentrator with varying placements of the concentrator, TEG, PV cell, and heat

extractor. The experiments concluded with a linear dependence of the TEG

efficiency and the temperature difference of the 2 sides of the TEG with efficiency

reaching up to 4% at 155 °C with a generated power of 3W. This study shows that

the TEG-based hybrid systems have comparable cost and efficiency with that of the

traditional Photovoltaic Module. Although the electrical efficiency of the PVM

based system today is higher than that of the TEG based one, the expected

development of advanced nanostructured materials with higher thermoelectric

figure of merit could make these efficiencies practically equal.

2.2.2 A High-Temperature, High-Efficiency Solar Thermoelectric Generator

Prototype [14]

A STEG is a solid-state heat engine that converts sunlight directly into DC

electricity through the thermoelectric effect. STEGs consist of three subsystems:

the solar absorber, the thermoelectric generator (TEG), and the heat management

system. The constructed system consisted of high end materials and many solar

absorbing components. The solar absorbing system consists of a high flux solar

furnace directed into the TEG system that is encased in a water-cooled quartz

window, with a thermal/optical cavity to ensure that solar radiation bounces back

into the solar selective absorber into the high end TEG. The cooling system includes
19

water cooling and a heatsink. This complex system made with high end materials

yielded efficiencies reaching up to 5%, with further modifications and tests

expected to reach 15%.

Figure 2.1 High Efficiency STEG Prototype

2.2.3 High-Performance Flat-Panel Solar Thermoelectric Generators With

High Thermal Concentration [10]

A flat panel STEG prototype was designed and constructed that was able to

achieve a peak efficiency of 4.6%. The value is reportedly 6-7 higher than that of

the usual flat panel STEGs. This was achieve by the use of high-performance

nanostructured thermoelectric materials and spectrally-selective solar absorbers in


20

an innovative design that exploits high thermal concentration in an evacuated

environment.

Figure 2.2 flat panel STEG prototype

2.3 TEG Attached Tin Stove Related Literature

2.3.1 Improvement of Biogas Fuelled-off-Grid Thermoelectric

Microcogeneration Kitchen System [15]

A recent study on the improvement of a biogas fueled stove where TEGs

with large heatsinks are mounted around the lower portion of a designed metal

stove. A similar approach to our study but with more in depth focus on biogas and

kitchen system design. The researchers were able to produce up to just 1 Watt of

power with major improvements on their metal stove to allow for optimal TEG
21

performance. The difference with this and our current study is that no changes will

be made to the tin can stove, it will be left just as how the people used it before and

up to now. This study by Masamayor concludes that even with peak temperature

difference, very high heat source, and optimal system design, common commercial

thermoelectric generators will still have very low power yield which the researchers

then concluded that further research and development of thermoelectric generators

are needed.

Figure 2.3 Gas Stove Burner with TEG and Heatsink Configuration

2.3.2 Conversion of Wasted Heat Energy into Electrical Energy Using TEG [7]

In this study, the researchers were able to charge a mobile phone using a

modified setup that includes heating up a high-end TEG using a gas burner as a heat

source. They used a long sheet of aluminum with a the burner on one end, and the

TEG with a heatsink attached to the other end. They then used a boost converter to
22

boost the output voltage of the TEG in order to charge the phone. This type of

system can be used in third world countries to have efficient energy usage while

cooking.

Figure 2.4 Phone Charging Gas Stove Burner with TEG


23

2.2 Thermoelectric Generators

2.2.2 Analysis of a Reconfigurable TEG Array for High Efficiency

Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting [15]

A theoretical analysis of constructing a reconfigurable TEG array is

presented in this paper. All possible combinations of 2 – TEG and 4 – TEG arrays

are investigated and the cause of intrinsic maximum power loss is analyzed for some

combinations. This paper provides information regarding the efficiencies and

generated voltages of the different TEG combinations. These combinations include

series, parallel, and different combinations of series-parallel connected

thermoelectric generators with each combination yielding different efficiency to

generated voltage graph curves.

2.2.3 Experimental Study: Design of Thermoelectric Generator (TEG) Fixture

for Harvesting an Automobile Electricity [4]

This study focuses on the output of four thermoelectric generators when

attached in series and mounted on the car engine. The results show a maximum

voltage of 2.05 V with a temperature difference of 17.8 degrees Celsius which was

generated when the engine starts up to a time range between 520 to 530 seconds.

The generated voltages and currents both rise linearly with respect to time, upon

reaching its maximum point, it slowly lowers down in value until it produces a
24

steady amount of voltage and current, this is because the thermoelectric generators’s

cold side have started to heat up and reach thermal equilibrium. This shows one

drawback of thermoelectric generators; which is its tendency to reach thermal

equilibrium on both sides causing a lowering of energy that is produced through

time.

2.2.4 The Thermoelectric Analysis of Different Heat Flux Conduction

Materials for Power Generation Board [5]

This study tests the output of thermoelectric generators when a type of

material is heat conducting material is attached to its hot side. Three experimental

variations were done; one with no material attached, one with aluminum attached,

and one with graphene attached. The results showed that graphene yielded the

greatest power, with aluminum coming in second, while the experiment with no

heat conducting metal yielded the lowest power output. The tests were done by

simulation and in actuality by attaching a cooling fin to the cold side of the TEG to

keep it at a constant zero degrees while the hot side is exposed to ambient

temperature.
25

2.2.5 Power and efficiency measurement of a thermoelectric cooler [16]

This study documents a laboratory experiment that determines the

efficiency of a thermoelectric cooler. The tests were done using an NI DAQ as a

DAQ system and involves the construction of a system that attaches a heater into

the TEC and pumps water into the cold side of the TEC.

2.3 Literature summary

Solar energy can be harvested using photovoltaic or thermoelectric solar

cells [7, 8]. Most studies regarding thermoelectric solar cells focus on designing

prototypes that use different methods such as combining PV and thermoelectric

devices [9], and the improvement of solar absorption and temperature management

of the system [10]. However, the problem with thermoelectric solar cells is that

most of its researches use many complex materials and the lack of further research

and development.

Some of the researches revolving around the implementation of TEGs on

improvised cooking systems include designing a biogas fueled kitchen system [11],

and implementing different cooling systems to increase stove efficiency [12]. Using

TEGs on cooking systems, usually improvised stoves, yields a good amount

harvested energy. However, most of these studies require the construction of stoves

that involves complex equipment.


26

Existing

Techniques in
Description Results
characterizing

TEGS

Water Boiling Test Exposes the hot side of the A multimeter provides

[15] TEG into boiling water and reliable DAQ. However, a

uses a multimeter and a thermal gun has accuracy

thermal gun for DAQ. problems when directed to

the TEG that is exposed in

boiling water.

Heating tape and Attaches a heating tape to Regulating water at the cold

water cooling [16] the hot side of the TEG side helps in increasing and

while regulating a flow of maintaining temperature

water into the cold side of difference. However, the

the TEG. temperature of a heating

tape cannot be controlled

and has limitations.

Table 2. 1 Summary of Existting Techniques in Characterizing TEG


27

Existing

Techniques for
Description Results
Increasing

Thermoelectric

Solar Cell

Efficiency

PV and STEG Involves implementing Provides high efficiency at

hybrid. [9] TEGs into PV technology the cost of complex

materials.

Heatsink Attached a heatsink to the System is able to maintain a

attachment with cold side of the TEG and high temperature difference

water cooling. [14] implements a water cooling given that the hot side is

system. exposed to high

temperature.

Solar absorber [10] Attaches a solar absorber Able to increase the

that absorbs solar energy temperature at the hot side of

the TEG.
28

and has high thermal

conductivity.

Table 2. 2 Existing Techniques for Increasing Thermoelectric Solar Cell


Efficiency

Existing

Techniques for
Description Results
Increasing

Energy

Harvesting Stove

Efficiency

Series-parallel Connects the TEG array in Lowers internal resistance of

connection. [15] a series-parallel the system and increases

connection. output current.


29

High Thermal Attaches metals with high Increases the temperature of

Conductivity thermal conductivity to the the hot side of the TEG and

Metals. hot side of the TEG. also protects the TEG from

damages.

Table 2. 3 Existing Techniques for Increasing Energy Harvesting Stove Efficiency


CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY

Figure 3.1 Methodology Flowchart


31

This chapter covers the research methodology that explains the research

methods, techniques, and procedures used by the researcher to obtain a successful

outcome of the study.

Figure 3.1 shows the methodology flowchart which contains the flow of

process that is strictly followed which serves as a guide for the researchers in

achieving the objectives of the study. The first step requires conceptualizing the

design of the energy harvesting systems, as well as its different variations. Next,

various Solidworks simulations revolving TEGs are done in order to have a good

and efficient design on the energy harvesting system to be built. Then, the SP1848-

27145 TEG’s energy harvesting capabilities are characterized. After knowledge

gathering and simulations, designing the two energy harvesting systems is done,

with building these systems following immediately after the designing phase. The

constructed Thermoelectric Solar Cell and the tin stove with attached TEG systems

is finally used, the Thermoelectric Solar Cell is exposed to sunlight while wood or

coal is burned inside the tin stove with attached TEG systems. During these working

periods, different parameters are simultaneously characterized using the arduino

DAQ system. The last part is storing energy into a battery using the harvested

energy from the two different systems and calculate the rate of the charging of the

battery while the two systems are at work.


32

3.1 Conceptualized Energy Harvesting System

Figure 3.2 System Block

Figure 3.2 shows the conceptualized system block for the energy harvesting

systems. The entire system is divided into 4 parts. The first part is the thermoelectric

generation where heat from solar energy or from the fire in the tin stove heats up

the hot side of the thermoelectric generators. The resulting temperature difference

produces an output power which is regulated using a boost converter. The regulated

power is then stored in a lithium ion battery for device usage where the output of

the battery is regulated using a boost converter again, making the output power of

the battery stable and safe for device usage.


33

3.1.1 Thermoelectric Generator Efficiency Improvement

A Thermoelectric Generator works by converting a heat difference between

its hot side and its cold side. The greater the heat difference, the greater the

generated electrical energy. However, one downside of the thermoelectric generator

is that the heat from the hot side of the TEG carries over into the cold side via

conduction, hence, increasing the temperature of the cold side and therefore,

lowering the TEG’s temperature difference and output energy. This is always the

case of TEGs since it obeys the zeroth law of thermodynamics where the hotter

object always transfer heat into the less hot object when both are in contact until

both objects are in thermal equilibrium, in this study’s case, the hotter object is the

hot side of the TEG and the colder object is the cold side of the TEG. Because of

this, TEG’s as of now have a limited operation time, which is the amount of time

when the temperature difference between the two sides of the TEG is large enough

to generate sufficient energy. There are many ways to compensate this type of

disadvantage of TEGs such as using a cooling system that flows into the cold side,

or using a simple fan to keep the cold side cooler. In this experiment a simple

aluminum heatsink is attached to the cold side of the TEG using thermal paste in

order to disperse the heat from the cold side into the atmosphere which allows for

the cold side to stay at a sufficiently lower temperature from the hot side for an

extended amount of time.


34

Figure 3.3 Aluminum Heatsink

A heatsink is a passive heat exchanger that transfers heat. The heatsink is

typically a metallic part which can be attached to a device releasing energy in the

form of heat, with the aim of dissipating that heat to a surrounding fluid in order to

prevent the device overheating.

Thermal paste is a very high heat conductive paste that is used between two

objects to get better heat conduction, one of which, is usually a heatsink. It fills in

all those microscopic imperfections on the heatsink and the other object that can

trap air in them and cause a loss in the heatsink’s performance as air is a very poor

conductor of heat.
35

3.1.2 CE8301 Boost Converter and Charging Technique

The DC - DC Boost Converter used in this study is the CE8301 model. It is

a CMOS PFM-control step up switching DC - DC converter that mainly consists of

a reference voltage source, an oscillator, and a comparator. The built-in MOS FET

is turned off by a protection circuit when the voltage at the LX pin exceeds the limit

to prevent it from being damaged. The input consists of two pins; one for positive,

and one for negative. The output of the CE8301 is a female USB port. The minimum

voltage required for the converter is 0.9 V and it boosts that voltage up to 5 V. It is

not safe or advisable to charge any device with a varying voltage input as it can

damage the device. In order to safely charge the lithium ion battery, the CE8301 dc

to dc boost converter is used for voltage regulation. Other than regulating the

voltage, the boost converter also increases the input voltage from the system into

the battery.

Figure 3.4 CE8301 Series Boost Converter


36

3.1.4 Lithium-ion battery

A 4.2 V lithium-ion battery is used to store the harvested energy from the

two systems. Lithium-ion batteries are suitable for this study because of their

advantages from other types of batteries. These advantages are that lithium-ion

batteries have higher energy densities than other common batteries allowing for

longer applications on devices and even though lithium ion batteries have high

energy densities, they still charge faster than other commercial batteries. Another

advantage of lithium-ion batteries is that they have a low self-discharge rate

compared to other rechargeable batteries, which is usually around five percent

within the first few hours of being fully charged and falls down to about one to two

percent per month. More importantly, lithium ion batteries have low to zero

memory effect. Memory effect is a phenomenon observed in rechargeable batteries

in which they lose their maximum energy capacity when repeated recharged after

being only partially discharged. This property of lithium ion batteries is very useful

in this study because the series of experiments requires the chosen battery to be

charged and discharged multiple times at low values.


37

Figure 3.5Sony 4.2V VTC5 Lithium-ion Battery

3.1.5 TEG Board Design

The TEG array is attached to an aluminum sheet with 12 by 12 inch

dimension, as aluminum is one of the most commercially available metal sheets that

has high thermal conductivity. An aluminum sheet, however, is glossy and reflects

sunlight, which makes it harder for the sheet to heat up. To compensate for this

characteristic of aluminum, the sheet is spray painted with black thin paint. The

color black is suitable for the solar cell application as it absorbs all wavelengths of

light, and therefore, heats up faster than other colors of the visible spectrum.

Thermal is be applied in between the hot side of the TEG and the aluminum sheet

to compensate for the microscopic gaps and air pockets in between. The paste alone

cannot hold the TEG in place to the surface of the aluminum sheet. Therefore, the
38

TEG array are attached in place with metal or plastic strips that are fastened tightly

into the aluminum sheet with nuts and bolt. An array containing 15 TEGs is suitable

in this study because 15 TEGs is enough to be connected in series, parallel, or series-

parallel in order to achieve a desired voltage output.

Figure 3.6 Conceptualized TEG Array Board

Figure 3.7Side View of the Conceptualized TEG Array Board


39

3.1.6 TEG Array Distance Variation

TEG array distance variation is done using Solidworks. The TEGs undergo

temperature simulation and their distance from one another is be varied. This is to

find out whether a TEG Array where the TEGs are closely attached with each other

has a significant difference in temperature stability compared to a TEG Array where

the TEGs are a few centimeters apart. In this simulation, space compactness of the

TEG Array is taken into consideration as well as the temperature stability of the

system. There are three variations done for this simulation. The first variation

simulates no distance in between the TEGs, the second simulates a 2 cm spacing in

between the TEGs, and the third simulates a 4 cm spacing in between the TEGs.a

3.2 Measuring Techniques using Arduino

In measuring the different parameters such as the open circuit voltage, and

output power of the TEG and the system, the Arduino Uno is used as a data

acquisition system. Two thermocouple modules are connected to the Arduino and

attached to the hot side and cold side of the TEG in order to obtain the temperature

difference. The TEG system output is also connected to the arduino in order to

analyze its voltage characteristics as a function of temperature difference. The data

gathered by the arduino is analyzed and graphed using Microsoft Excel.


40

3.2.1 Voltage and Current Measurement

Figure 3.8 Voltage Measurement Circuit

Arduino Uno can be configured as a voltage measuring device. Figure 3.8

shows the circuit diagram for measuring the voltage across a load. Analog pins

configured as input pins are said to be in a high-impedance state equivalent to a

series resistor of 100 MΩ. The Arduino can accurately measure the voltage of a

voltage load because of the relatively large resistance across the nodes of the load

voltage. Arduino can only take a maximum input voltage of 5V at its analog pins;

a voltage divider with 1:1 ratio is configured to increase the voltage reading range

to 10V. Adjustments and calibrations for accurate data acquisition is done via the

arduino code which can be found in Appendix A.

Figure 3.9 is the circuit diagram for measuring the current across a load. The

relatively large resistance of the Arduino pin takes a negligible amount of current
41

from the load. Moreover, 1Ω is relatively small that it decreases the load current by

a negligible amount. To enhance the accuracy of the system, adjustments and

program calibrations has been conducted.

Figure 3.9 Current Measurement Circuit Diagram

3.2.2 Temperature Measurement

Figure 3.10 shows the pin configuration of the MAX6675 Thermocouple

Module. The GND, VCC, SCK, CS, and SO pins of module 1 is connected to pin

6, pin 5, pin 4, pin 3 and pin 2, respectively, while for module 2, these module pins

are connected to pin 13, pin 12, pin 11, pin 10 and pin 9, respectively. The arduino

program for temperature measurement can also be found in Appendix A.


42

Figure 3.10 Thermocouple Pin Configuration

3.3 TEG Characterization

For the TEG characterization, a heat blower is used in order to heat up the

hot side of the thermoelectric generator. The thermocouples are then attached to the

hot side and the cold side of the TEG in order to obtain the temperature difference.

The TEG and the thermocouples are then attached to an Arduino Uno for data

acquisition. To measure the open circuit voltage, short circuit current, internal

resistance and power output characteristics of the TEG, the hot side of the device is
43

heated up by the blower while the temperature of the cold side is maintained by

introducing a flowing water as coolant. The measured voltage, current, resistance

and power are compared to the instantaneous temperature difference with respect

to the real-time acquisition of data.

3.4 Thermoelectric Solar Cell Design

3.4.1 TEG and Heatsink efficiency variation for Thermoelectric Solar Cell

Three different variations in the TEG and heatsink is simulated in

Solidworks. The first uses only a Thermoelectric Generator in a temperature

simulation. The second has a heatsink attached into the TEG. Lastly, the third

variation has the heatsink attached TEG to be submerged in a water coolant that is

contained in an insulating box, the water in this system is constantly flowing. In the

third variation, only the heatsink is submerged in water. These three variations are

simulated in order to test which variation is more efficient in maintaining a high

and stable temperature difference. After the solidworks temperature simulation of

the three different TEG and Heatsink designs, the variation which has the higher

and more stable temperature difference with respect to time is chosen for the final

constructed Thermoelectric Solar Cell.


44

Figure 3.11 Thermoelectric Solar Cell Design Top View

Figure 3.11 shows the design for the thermoelectric solar cell. The

thermoelectric solar cell is placed on a Styrofoam box that acts as a water container.

A second Styrofoam box is placed at a lower elevation than the solar cell and

contains a water pump that pumps water via the blue hose into the first Styrofoam

box that acts as a water container for the solar cell. The water fills up the Styrofoam

water container and as it gets full, the water flows back into the Styrofoam box with

the water pump via two green hoses through gravity. This simulates flowing water

in the system by circulating water.


45

3.4.2 Thermoelectric Solar Cell

Upon simulating the 3 variations, the one with the water coolant yielded the

better temperature difference. Therefore the thermoelectric solar cell is constructed

with the design.

Figure 3.12 Thermoelectric Solar Cell Prototype

The Thermoelectric Solar Cell Prototype is shown in Fig. 3.6. A Styrofoam

box is used as the container for the water supply and water pump as well as the

container for which the TEG array is placed on. Water hoses are then used to

regulate the flow of water throughout the two Styrofoam containers.


46

3.5 Tin Stove Design

3.5.1 Tin Stove Modification and TEG array Attachment

The Tin Stove used in this study has the shape of a rectangular prism as it is

more convenient to attach the aluminum plate on a flat surface compared to a curved

one from a cylinder. A hole is cut at the lower part of one face of the stove, this is

where fuel such as firewood or coal is placed and burned to produce fire for cooking.

The TEG system is then attached to the opposite face of the hole where its aluminum

plate heats up via conduction and, in response, heat up the hot side of the TEG array.

3.5.2 Tin Stove TEG Fan Attachment

For Variation, a mini heatsink fan is attached to the heatsink of the TEG that

is attached to the cold side of the TEG. The fan draws power from the TEG. The

output power is then be compared to the output of a TEG without a fan attached to

the heatsink. It is then be calculated whether attaching a fan that draws power from

the TEG has any significant effect on the output power that the TEG generates.
47

Figure 3.13 Small Heatsink Fan

3.5.3 Tin Stove Prototype

Upon experimenting with the fan attached and without the fan, it is shown

that there is no significant difference in the output power of the TEG between the 2

variations. Therefore, the Tin Stove prototype will be constructed without small

heatsink fans attached.

Figure 3.14 Tin Stove Prototype front view


48

Figure 3.15 Tin Stove Prototype back view

Figures 3.8 and 3.9 show the front and back view of the tin stove prototype,

respectively. The tin stove is made from vintage biscuit tin cans that has a hole cut

at the bottom to allow for coal or firewood to be placed. Some people, usually from

rural areas, use this type improvised stove to cook their food. The TEG array is then

attached to the back of the Tin Stove.


49

3.6 Equations Used

3.6.1 Thermal Conductivity and Thermal Convection Equation

For thermal conductivity:

𝑘𝐴∆𝑇
𝑞=
𝑑

Equation. 3.1 Thermal conduction equation

Where:

q = rate of heat transfer (W)

k = thermal conductivity of the material (W/m2K)

A = cross sectional area of the material (m2)

∆T = temperature difference between two sides of the material

d = thickness of the material (m)


50

For thermal convection:

𝑞 = 𝑘𝐴∆T

Equation 3.2 Thermal convection equation

Where:

q = rate of heat transfer (W)

k = thermal conductivity of the material (W/m2K)

A = exposed surface area of the material (m2)

∆T = temperature difference between the object and the convecting fluid

The equations for thermal conductivity and convection are nearly similar, with just

an addition of the thickness of the material (d) in the conduction equation. These

equations are used to calculate the rate of heat transfer in the two systems.
51

3.6.2 Thermal Efficiency Equation

𝑃𝑜𝑢𝑡
𝑛= ⋅ 100
𝑃𝑖𝑛

Equation 3.3 Thermal efficiency equation

Where:

n = efficiency in percentage (%)

Pout = output power (W)

Pin = input power (W)

The thermal efficiency equation considers the input heat and output power

of the system. This equation is used to calculate the efficiency of the two systems.
CHAPTER 4

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter shows and discusses the results of the implementation of

energy harvesting system using an array of SP1848-27145 thermoelectric

generators from solar heat source and heat from tin stove.

4.1 Conceptualized Energy Harvesting System Initial Test Results

The initial tests of the conceptualized system uses a hair blower as a heat

source and is directed into the hot side of a thermoelectric generator. The test was

able to produce a voltage around the 1 V range but the temperature difference to

produce such voltage does not last long enough because the cold side of the TEG

also heats up due to conduction. Therefore, adding temperature regulating elements

such as a heatsink can help maintain a high temperature difference. The output

voltage of 1 volt is not high enough to charge a battery efficiently and an

inconsistent voltage output is not safe when charging a battery or any electronic

device. Thus, a boost converter is proves to be an efficient component to raise the

voltage to a maximum of 5V and regulate it for safety. However, the output power

of a 4.2 V lithium ion battery is not enough to charge common electronic devices,

such as a cellphone, therefore attaching another boost converter to the output of the

battery is found to be necessary to raise its power output for it to be able to charge
53

common electronic devices. The results if this test provides useful information for

the design and construction of the thermoelectric solar cell and energy harvesting

tin stove.

4.2 Effects of Varying the Distance between TEG modules

Source Temperature, Ts 60 ℃

Convective Coefficient of air, hc 10 W/m2.K

Volume Flow Rate 0.0002 m3/s

Table 4.1 Simulation parameters for TEG module


54

4.2a No Spacing

Figure 4.1 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
without spacing (isometric view).

Figure 4. 2 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
without spacing (side view).
55

4.2b 2cm Spacing

Figure 4.3 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 2cm spacing (isometric view).

Figure 4.4 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 2cm spacing (side view).
56

4.2c 4cm Spacing

Figure 4.5 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 4cm spacing (isometric view).

Figure 4.6 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG array
with 4cm spacing (side view).
57

Spacing between Hot Side Cold Side Temperature


TEGs, cm Temperature, ℃ Temperature, ℃ Difference, ℃

0 60.00 45.62 14.38

2 60.00 44.86 15.14

4 60.00 44.82 15.18

Table 4.2 Simulation Summary

The initial condition parameters for the simulations is summarized in Table

4.1. Figures 4.1-6 show the thermal simulation results when the distance between

the TEG is varied by 0cm, 2cm, and 4cm. Results show that the temperature

difference measured for the three setup is 14.38℃, 15.14℃ and 15.18℃,

respectively. Consequently, it is inferred that there is no significant difference

between the temperature differences for the three setups.


58

4.3 SP1848-27145 TEG Characterization

Voltage vs Temperature Difference


1.4

1.2

1
Voltage, V

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ˚C

Figure 4.7 Voltage response of the TEG module as a function of temperature


difference.
59

Current vs Temperature Difference


0.3

0.25

0.2
Current, A

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ℃

Figure 4.8 Current response of the TEG module as a function of temperature


difference.

Resistance
5
4.5
4
Internal Resistance, Ω

3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ℃

Figure 4.9 Internal resistance of the TEG module as a function of temperature


difference.
60

Power Output
0.35

0.3

0.25
Power, W

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ℃

Figure 4.10 Maximum power output of the TEG as a function of temperature


difference.

Figures 4.7-10 show the response characteristics of a TEG SP1848-27145

module with increasing temperature difference. Figures 4.7 and 4.8 shows that the

voltage and current characteristics, respectively, of the device increases linearly

with temperature difference. Moreover, figure 4.9 shows that there is no significant

change in the internal resistance of the TEG module when the temperature is varied.

In figure 4.10, it can be observed that the power output of the device increases

drastically as the temperature difference between the hot side and cold side

increases.
61

4.4 Performance of Thermoelectric Solar Cell

4.4.1 Thermal Analysis Simulation Results of Thermoelectric Solar Cell

This section discusses the effects of adding a heatsink to the cold side of the

TEG module.

4.4.1a No Heatsink

Source Temperature, Ts 60 ℃

Convective Coefficient of air, hc 10 W/m2.K

Table 4.3 Simulation parameters for simulating the TEG module without heatsink.
62

Figure 4.11 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module without heatsink (isometric view).

Figure 4.12 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module without heatsink (side view).
63

Average Hot Side Temperature, Th 60℃

Average Cold Side Temperature, Tc 58.316℃

Temperature Difference, ΔT 1.684℃

Table 4.4 Simulation summary for the TEG without heatsink.

The simulation condition parameters for simulating the TEG module

without heatsink is summarized in Table 4.3. Figures 4.11 and 4.12 show the

simulation results of the steady state thermal analysis in isometric and side view,

respectively. Result summary in Table 4.4 shows that the average surface

temperature at the hot side of the TEG is 60℃, and the average surface temperature

at the cold side is 58.316℃. As a result, the simulated average temperature

difference between the hot side and the cold side of the TEG is 1.684℃.

4.4.1b Addition of Heatsink with Free Convection through Air

Source Temperature, Ts 60 ℃

Convective Coefficient of air, hc 10 W/m2.K

Table 4.5 Simulation parameters for simulating the TEG module.


64

Figure 4.13 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink (isometric view).

Figure 4.14 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink (side view).
65

Average Hot Side Temperature, Th 60℃

Average Cold Side Temperature, Tc 48.719℃

Temperature Difference, ΔT 11.281℃

Table 4.6 Simulation summary

The simulation condition parameters for simulating the TEG module with

heatsink and free convection through air is summarized in Table 4.5. Figures 4.13

and 4.14 show the simulation results of the steady state thermal analysis in isometric

and side view, respectively. Result summary in Table 4.6 shows that the average

surface temperature at the hot side of the TEG is 60℃, and the average surface

temperature at the cold side is 48.719℃. As a result, the simulated average

temperature difference between the hot side and the cold side of the TEG is

11.281℃.
66

4.4.1c With Heatsink and Water Coolant

Source Temperature, Ts 60 ℃

Convective Coefficient of air, hc 10 W/m2.K

Volume Flow Rate 0.0002 m3/s

Table 4.7 Simulation parameters for TEG module

Figure 4.15 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink and water coolant (isometric view).
67

Figure 4.16 Simulation result for the steady state thermal analysis of the TEG
module with heatsink and water coolant (side view).

Average Hot Side Temperature, Th 60℃

Average Cold Side Temperature, Tc 36.467℃

Temperature Difference, ΔT 23.533℃

Table 4. 8 Simulation summary


68

The simulation condition parameters for simulating the TEG module with

heatsink and using water as a heat dispersion medium is summarized in Table 4.7.

Figures 4.15 and 4.16 show the simulation results of the steady state thermal

analysis in isometric and side view, respectively. Result summary in Table 4.8

shows that the average surface temperature at the hot side of the TEG is 60℃, and

the average surface temperature at the cold side is 36.467℃. As a result, the

simulated average temperature difference between the hot side and the cold side of

the TEG is 23.533℃. The results show that adding a heatsink with water coolant

into the system yields a significantly greater value of temperature difference.

Therefore, a setup with water coolant and heatsink is necessary to achieve optimal

efficiency for the thermoelectric solar cell.

4.4.2 Single TEG Module Performance for Thermoelectric Solar Cell

Figure 4.17 shows the open circuit voltage of the single TEG module when

the hot side is exposed under the sun. The average voltage value for the duration is

around 0.128 V. The equivalent circuit diagram for the TEG in this setup is

described in the schematic diagram in Figure 4.18.


69

Open Circuit Voltage

0.16
y=0.1276
0.14

0.12

0.1
Voltage, V

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0
0 10 20 30 time,40mins 50 60 70 80

Figure 4.17 Open circuit voltage of a single TEG module for solar energy
harvesting.

Figure 4.18 Equivalent circuit for the TEG for solar energy harvesting.
70

4.4.3 Array of 15 TEG Module in Series for Thermoelectric Solar Cell

Open Circuit Voltage


2.5

1.5
Voltage, V

0.5

0
9:00:00 AM 10:48:00 AM 12:36:00 PM 2:24:00 PM 4:12:00 PM
Time

Figure 4.19 Open circuit voltage of 15 TEG in series

Figure 4.20 Equivalent circuit for the 15 TEG array in series.


71

Figure 4.19 shows the open circuit voltage response of the 15-TEG in series

system when the hot-side aluminum plate is exposed under the sun. The duration of

the experiment covers from 9:53 AM to 3:13 PM, a total of 5.33 hours.

Power Output
0.35

0.3

0.25
Power, W

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ℃

Figure 4.21 Power output of the 15 TEG in series as a function of temperature


difference.

Figure 4.21 is the characterization of the system comparing the maximum

power output and temperature difference between the hot side and the cold side of

the device. The graph shows that the maximum power output increases in an

exponential manner as the magnitude of the temperature difference increases. Thus,

the efficiency of the system is increased if the temperature difference is maintained

at maximum.
72

Figure 4.22 shows the voltage response of the CE8301 Boost Converter at

its output with respect to the open circuit voltage of the 15-TEG system. The open

circuit voltage required for the boost converter to produce a regulated 5V output is

0.97 V. Moreover, Figure 4.23 shows the power output response of the CE8301

boost converter as a function of the open circuit voltage of the 15-TEG system. The

power output of the converter starts to increase linearly at 0.528 mark.

Output Voltage
6.0

5.0

4.0
Voltage, V

3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Voltage, V

Figure 4.22 Voltage output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output.
73

Power Output
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
Power, W

0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Voltage, V

Figure 4.23 Power output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output
74

4.5 Performance of TEG Array Attached in Tin Stove

4.5.1 Single TEG Performance with Heatsink attached in Tin Stove

Open Circuit Voltage


1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
Voltage, V

y=0.470
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Time, min

Figure 4.24 Open circuit voltage of a single TEG module


75

4.5.2 Effects of Adding a BF6025 DC Fan

Power
0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
-0.05

Figure 4.25 Power output consumption of the dc fan.

This section discusses the effects of adding an external exhaust dc fan

powered by a 4.2V lithium-ion battery to the performance of a single TEG. Figure

4.25 shows the power consumption of the fan with respect to the voltage input. The

power consumption of the dc fan at 4.2 Volts is 259 mW.

Figure 4.26 shows the changes in voltage output of the TEG when the fan is

introduced. The orange-colored curve describes the response of the TEG when the

fan is not present, the black-colored curve is the voltage response of the TEG when

the fan is turned on, and the dashed-blue line is the projected curve if the fan was

not turned on. The curve is described by the equation y = 508.04x-0.879. The average

increase in voltage is 0.161V. Consequently, the estimated increase in power output


76

is 6.78 mW. Considering the assumption that the battery voltage is maintained at

4.2 voltage, the power consumption of the fan 259.41 mW. As a result, adding an

external dc fan to increase the power output of the TEG yields a net increase in

power of -252.63 mW. Thus, the fan acts as a degenerative component for the

energy harvesting system.

ΔVave,increase 0.161 V

ΔPave.increase 6.78 mW

Pfan 259.41 mW

ΔPnet -252.63 mW

Table 4.9 Result summary when adding a fan


77

Voltage Output
1.4
1.2
1
Voltage, V

0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Time, s
Estimated
Fan is Off Voltage Fan is On

Figure 4.26 Voltage variation when a dc fan is introduced.

4.5.3 Array of 15 TEG Module in Series-Parallel Combination attached in


Tin Stove

Figure 4.27 shows the open circuit voltage of the 15-TEG array in series-

parallel combination used for the energy harvesting from the heat of the tin stove.

Moreover, Figure 4.28 is the characterization of the 15-TEG system comparing the

power output as a function of temperature difference between the hot side and cold

side. Figure 4.29 shows the voltage response of the CE8301 Boost Converter at its

output with respect to the open circuit voltage of the 15-TEG system. The open

circuit voltage required for the boost converter to produce a regulated 5V output is

0.56 V. Figure 4.30 shows the power output response of the CE8301 boost converter
78

as a function of the open circuit voltage of the 15-TEG system. The power output

of the converter starts to increase linearly at 0.47V mark.

Voltage
3

2.5

2
Voltage, V

1.5

0.5

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
-0.5
Time, mins

Figure 4.27 Open circuit voltage of a 15 TEGs in series-parallel configuration.


79

Power Output
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
Power, W

0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Temperature Difference, ˚C

Figure 4.28 Power output of the 15 TEGs in series-parallel as a function of


temperature difference.

Output Voltage
6.0

5.0

4.0
Voltage, V

3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Voltage, V

Figure 4. 29 Voltage output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output.
80

Max Power
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
Voltage, V

0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Voltage, V

Figure 4.30 Power output of CE8301 Boost Converter with respect to TEG array
voltage output.

4.6 Efficiency calculation

The input heat is measured as the rate of heat transfer from the hot side to

the cold side of the thermoelectric module. The TEG is a composite of three

materials which includes Alumina, solder, and Bismuth Telluride. The thermal

resistivity of the device is added in series for composite materials like TEG. The

rate of heat transfer for a TEG is described in the equation below.

𝐿1 𝐿2 𝐿3 −1
𝑞=[ + + ] (∆𝑇)
𝑘1 𝐴1 𝑘2 𝐴2 𝑘3 𝐴3

where,
81

q = rate of heat transfer (W)

L = thickness of the material (m)

A = cross-sectional area of the material (m2)

k = thermal conductivity of the material (W/m K)

ΔT = temperature difference between the hot side and cold side (K)

Thermal
Material Thickness, mm Area, m2
Conductivity

Alumina 0.96 0.0016 30

Soldering
0.32 0.000913 57
Material

Bismuth Telluride 2.54 0.000651 1.8

Table 4.10 Summary of the material properties of a TEG.


82

4.6.1 Efficiency of the Array of 15 TEGs

Efficiency and Power Input


Axis Title
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
0.25 200
0.2
Efficiency, %

150

Power, W
0.15
100
0.1
0.05 50

0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Temperature Difference, ˚C

Efficiency Power Input

Figure 4.31 Efficiency of the TEG array as a function of temperature difference.

Efficiency is the measure of the power output divided by the rate of heat

transfer, q, from the hot side to the cold side of the TEG. Using the equation of the

conductive heat transfer for composite objects and the material properties in Table

10, the efficiency can be estimated. Figures 4.32 and 4.33 show the efficiency of

the 15-TEG in series for solar energy harvesting and 15-TEG in series-parallel for

heat energy harvesting from tin stove. The maximum efficiency recorded from solar

energy harvesting is 0.257%, while from the heat from tin stove is 0.67%. This

efficiency values is the efficiency at the output of the TEG-system array only.
83

Heat Input and Efficiency for Solar


0.35 120
0.3 100
0.25 80
Efficiency, %

Power, W
0.2 60
0.15 40
0.1 20
0.05 0
0 -20
9:36:00 AM 12:00:00 PM 2:24:00 PM
Time

Efficiency Heat Input

Figure 4.32 Heat input and efficiency of the TEG array for solar energy
harvesting application.

Heat Input and Efficiency for Tin Stove


1 70
60
0.8
50
0.6
Efficiency, %

40
Power, W

0.4 30
20
0.2
10
0
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
-0.2 -10
Time, min

Power In

Figure 4.33 Heat input and efficiency of the TEG array for energy harvesting in tin
stove.
84

4.6.2 Efficiency of the CE8301 Boost Converter

Figure 4.34 Efficiency of the CE8301 boost converter.

Taken from the datasheet of the CE8301 Boost Converter, figure 4.34 shows

the efficiency of the device and the corresponding output current as response to the

specific voltage inputs. The typical efficiency of the boost converter is around 85%.
85

4.6.3 System Overall Efficiency

The overall efficiency of the system is defined by the equation

𝜂𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 𝜂𝑇𝐸𝐺 𝑥 𝜂𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑡

where 𝜂𝑇𝐸𝐺 is the efficiency of the array of TEGs and 𝜂𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑡 is the efficiency of the
boost converter.

𝜂𝑇𝐸𝐺|𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟 0.29%

𝜂𝑇𝐸𝐺|𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑣𝑒 0.67%

𝜂𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑡 85%

𝜼𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍|𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒂𝒓 0.25%

𝜼𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍|𝑺𝒕𝒐𝒗𝒆 0.57%

Table 4. 11 Summary of Efficiency

The overall efficiency of the thermoelectric energy harvesting system is

0.25% and 0.57% for solar energy harvesting and from the heat of the tin stove,

respectively.
86

4.7 Energy Harvesting and Storing

Phone Battery Percentage (%)


100
90
80 91%
70
Percentage, %

60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Time, mins

Figure 4.35 Phone battery percentage with respect to charging time

Lithium-Ion Battery Voltage (V)


4.5
4
3.5
3
3.245 V
Voltage, V

2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Time, mins

Figure 4.36 Battery voltage level with respect to charging time.


87

For charging the mobile phone with a 3000 mAh battery, the output of the

4.2 lithium-ion battery is regulated to 5V using CE8301 boost converter. Figure

4.31 shows the level of battery percentage with respect to charging time. At time =

0 min, the initial battery level of the mobile phone is 39%. The final charging time

is 220 min, and the battery level percentage of the mobile phone is 91%. The total

increase in battery level percentage is 52%. Figure 4.36 shows the voltage level of

the lithium-ion battery with respect to charging time. The initial voltage of the

battery at time = 0 min is 4.183V. After 220 min of charging, the voltage of the

battery dropped to 3.245 V. At this level, the battery can no longer provide the

charging requirements of the mobile phone.

Battery Voltage (Solar)


4.50 4.20
3.90
4.00 3.56
3.503.17
3.00
Voltage, V

2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Time, mins

Figure 4.37 Effective battery voltage as a function of charging time (solar cell).
88

Battery Voltage (Tin Stove)


4.5 4.2
3.96
4
3.53.25
3
Voltage, V

2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Time, mins

Figure 4.38 Effective battery voltage as a function of charging time (tin stove).

Figures 4.37 and 4.38 shows the voltage level of the battery when charged

by the solar energy harvesting and heat from tin stove, respectively. It takes around

3 hours to charge the battery from 3.17V to 4.2V from the solar energy harvesting

system, and around 40 minutes of charging to increase the battery voltage from 3.25

V to 4.2 V using the heat from tin stove.


CHAPTER 5

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Conlcusion

The SP1848-27145 Thermoelectric Generator’s energy producing

capabilities were successfully characterized. Based on the data obtained, a TEG

array can be connected in series, parallel, or series-parallel, to achieve optimal

efficiency for different applications and the output power of designing

thermoelectric generator based energy harvesting system purely depends on the

number of TEG modules, the temperature difference between the hot side and cold

side of the TEG module, and the type of connection of the array.

A Thermoelectric Solar Cell was successfully designed and constructed. It

is concluded that the TEG array for a thermoelectric solar cell should connected in

series to effectively increase its open circuit voltage of the system, however, the

effective internal resistance of the system increases linearly with the number of

TEGs in series. The constructed Thermoelectric Solar Cell successfully harvests

solar energy and stores it in a lithium battery at a rate of 1.03V in 3 hours and the

system’s different parameters were successfully analyzed.


90

An Energy Harvesting Tin Stove was successfully designed and constructed

using thermoelectric generators. It is concluded that the TEG array attached to the

tin stove should be connected in series-parallel, as the large temperature difference

from a tin stove system can lead to a large amount of output voltage from the TEG.

A series-parallel connection is necessary to effectively decrease the internal

resistance of the system and in return, limits the open circuit voltage of the system.

The constructed Tin Stove successfully harvests waste heat energy and stores it in

a lithium battery at a rate of 0.95 V in 40 mins and the system’s different parameters

were successfully analyzed.

The temperature difference of TEGs should be considered in designing a

system and the connectivity of its array in order to achieve efficient performance.

The drawback of using TEG modules for energy harvesting is relatively high

internal resistance. Consequently, the maximum power that can be outputted by the

device is limited due to this factor. The collected data shows that there is no

significant change in the internal resistance of the system with respect to increasing

temperature difference, therefore it is desirable to make a thermoelectric energy

harvesting system that could maintain the temperature differential at maximum.


91

5.2 Recommendations

For further researches regarding thermoelectric based energy harvesting

systems, the researchers propose the following recommendations:

1. Improve the heat dispersion method by using a heatsink with larger fins.

This increases the surface area for either convective or conductive heat

transfer.

2. Use a heatsink material that has a higher thermal conductivity than

aluminum, such as copper.

3. Consider using a TEG module other than the TEG SP1848-27145 that yields

better performance than the latter.

4. Use expensive thermal paste with lower thermal resistance and make sure

that the materials in contact are tightly bonded.


APPENDIX A

Data Acquisition Arduino Code


93
References

[1] R. Gicquel, and May Gicquel. “Introduction to Global Energy

Issues”, 2013

[2] “SEEBECK EFFECT” Taken from:

https://www.marlow.com/how-do-thermoelectric-generators-tegs-

work

[3] “How Thermoelectric Generators Work”. Taken from:

http://www.alphabetenergy.com/how-thermoelectrics-work/

[4] A. Awria, M. Albana, R. Hakim, “Experimental Study: Design of

Thermoelectric Generator (TEG) Fixture for Harvesting an

Automobile Electricity”, 2018

[5] S. Li, K. Lam, K. Cheng, “The Thermoelectric Analysis of Different

Heat Flux Conduction Materials for Power Generation Board”, 2017

[6] Q. Wan, Y. Teh, P. Mok, “Analysis of a Reconfigurable TEG Array

for High Efficiency Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting”, 2016


95

[7] M. DeBono, “What is Solar Energy and How Do Solar Panels

Work?”,2017

[8] D. Fong, “Sustainable Energy Solutions for Rural Areas and

Application for Groundwater Extraction” 2014

[9] E. Urbiola, L. Bulat, Y. Vorobiev, “Solar Hybrid Systems With

Thermoelectric Generators” 2012

[10] D. Kraemer, B. Poudel, H. Feng, J. Caylor, B. Yu, X. Yan, Y. Ma,

X. Wang, D. Wang, A. Muto, K. McEnaney, M. Chiesa, Z. Ren, G.

Chen, “High-Performance Flat-Panel Solar Thermoelectric

Generators With High Thermal Concentration”, 2011

[11] J. Sale, E. Sinugbuhan, “Biogas Fuelled-off-Grid Thermoelectric

Microcogeneration Kitchen System”, 2017

[12] H. Gao, G. Huang, H. Li, Z. Qu, Y. Zhang, “Development of stove-

powered thermoelectric generators: a review”, 2015

[13] M. Guang-yu, C. Jiu-ju, Z. Wen-wei, D. Hui, “Analytical Research

on Waste Heat Recovery and Utilization of China’s Iron & Steel

Industry”, 2011
96

[14] M. L. Olsen , E. L. Warren , P. A. Parilla , E. S. Toberer, C. E.

Kennedy , G. J. Snyder , S. A. Firdosy , B. Nesmith , A. Zakutayev,

A. Goodrich , C. S. Turchi , J. Netter , M. H. Gray , P. F. Ndione ,

R. Tirawat , L. L. Baranowski , A. Gray , and D. S. Ginley, “A High-

Temperature, High-Efficiency Solar Thermoelectric Generator

Prototype”, 2013

[15] G. Masamayor, J. Pueblas, “Improvement of Biogas Fuelled-off-

Grid Thermoelectric Microcogeneration Kitchen System”, 2018

[16] S. O’Halloran, M. Rodrigues, “Power and efficiency measurement

of a thermoelectric cooler”, 2012


CURRICULUM VITAE

ROVIC JAN RAFAEL L. ROA


Address: Pob. 1, Oroquieta City,
Misamis Occidental
Birthdate: January 11, 1997
Birthplace: Oroquieta City
Contact No.: 09955682691
Email: rovicroa@gmail.com
Father: Rey M. Roa
Mother: Blaise L. Roa

Educational Background:

TERTIARY: MSU – Iligan Institute of Tecnology


Bachelor of Science in Electronics Engineering
Batch 2019
SECONDARY: Misamis Occidental National High School
Batch 2013
ELEMENTARY: Oroquieta City Central Elementary School
Batch 2009

Work Experience
On-the-Job Training: PLDT-PHILCOM
Cagayan de Oro City
June – August 2017
98

AFFILIATIONS

Cybercom Head, Junior Institute of Electronics Engineers in the Philippines

- Iligan Bay Chapter, 2017 – 2018

Cybercom Head, Junior Institute of Electronics Engineers in the Philippines


- MSU – IIT Chapter, 2018 - 2019

Cybercom Member, Junior Institute of Electronics Engineers in the Philippines


- MSU – IIT Chapter, 2016 – 2019

Member, Junior Institute of Electronics Engineers in the Philippines

- Northern Mindanao Chapter, 2015 – 2016

Member, Junior Institute of Electronics Engineers in the Philippines

- Iligan Bay Chapter, 2016 - 2019

Member, Junior Institute of Electronics Engineers in the Philippines


- MSU – IIT Chapter, 2013 - 2019

S-ar putea să vă placă și