Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
November 6, 2019
2126 Lyndale Avenue S #6
Minneapolis, MN 55405
Not too very long ago, the SEC website used to proclaim, “First and foremost, the SEC is
a law-enforcement agency.” Those words have disappeared, and the sentiment behind them is
gone, too. In the case of the Frost gang, the SEC (or at least certain actors within the SEC) now
seem intent on aiding, abetting, enabling and covering up illegal and highly profitable actions by
Phillip Frost, his henchmen, and companies controlled by the Frost gang and its associates.
Phillip Frost is the leader of a white collar gang that specializes in market manipulation
and securities fraud, especially pump and dump securities frauds. Frost has consented to
judgment and paid a $5 million fine as a result of securities fraud charges in SEC v Honig.
However, Frost’s settlement with the SEC allowed Frost to continue as Chairman and CEO at
Opko Health (OPK), where Frost is also the largest shareholder. Further, Frost gang members
and associates continue with fraudulent acts at a variety of companies in violation of the
securities laws of the United States of America.
I write regarding the complicity of the SEC with past and ongoing frauds of the Frost
gang. The situation is complicated and there are a lot of documents, but there is ample expertise
at the SEC to help you get a handle on things. Therefore, I will jump right in and address the
issues without any more introduction or background.
1
in the BioZone P&D. However, neither the original complaint nor the amended complaint in
SEC v Honig mentions the role of the SEC in facilitating the P&Ds by approving the RSs.
The SEC has approved RSs in numerous Frost gang P&Ds to the point where such RS
approvals by the SEC are hallmarks of Frost gang P&Ds. In fact, John Ford’s name on such an
RS by MGTI was one of the key pieces of evidence in establishing the existence of the P&D
securities frauds described in SEC v Honig.
Why did the SEC omit this important aspect of the Frost gang P&D securities frauds
from the SEC v Honig complaint?
2
The SEC website now says, "The mission of the SEC is to protect investors; maintain
fair, orderly, and efficient markets; and facilitate capital formation. The SEC strives to promote a
market environment that is worthy of the public's trust." How does does approving an RS
allowing Denver Lough to sell seven million shares of PTE further the SEC’s mission?
These issues I raise fall into three broad categories: (a) Frost gang connections with the
SEC; (b) Processing and approval of RSs by the SEC; and (c ) the SEC’s lack of timely and
effective responses to my whistleblower tips and other communications, and the SEC culture
around that. For category (a), it should be a simple matter for the OIG to determine the identity
of the SEC employees who have communicated with Kesner and other Frost gang members and
associates, and the content of those communications. Similarly for category (b), it should also be
straightforward to review the processing of RSs by Frost gang companies, including whether
such processing included any evaluation for fraud. Addressing category (c) is simple, but likely
problematic for the agency. It requires that the agency be evaluated as to whether its purpose is
to serve the interests of a corrupt billionaire (Frost), or to serve the interests of the American
public.
3
The issue of registration statements deserves more discussion here. There are several
categories that need to be examined.
1. RSs filed before a P&D that allow insiders (“selling shareholders”) to dump their
cheap/free shares. BioZone is a prime example.
2. RSs filed after a P&D that allow a company to sell shares to the public after a P&D. PTE
and RDVT are prime examples. In such situations the proceeds are often looted by Frost
gang members and associates.
3. The special case of Denver Lough’s seven million shares at PTE.
I have previously provided the SEC with voluminous documentation of all the matters
listed above. I now respectfully request a complete response to this letter by the SEC.
Agents from the Department of Justice are copied on this letter. Given the evidence of
internal corruption at the SEC, it may be appropriate for the DOJ to conduct their own
investigation of the SEC regarding the issues addressed in this letter.
Lee Pederson
Cc:
SEC OIG
Phillip Frost (℅ attorney Joe Dixon)
PTE (℅ attorney Maggie Dalton)
Bcc:
SEC and DOJ agents (FBI and US Attorney’s Office)
Journalists and business writers
Other interested persons