Sunteți pe pagina 1din 172

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND JOB

SATISFACTION: A CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS OF A RETAIL

ORGANIZATION

by

Kokou Agbolou

Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree

Doctor of Management in Organizational Leadership

UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX

March 2011
UMI Number: 3471686

All rights reserved

INFORMATION TO ALL USERS


The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted.

In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.

UMI 3471686
Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC.
All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.

ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346
© 2011 By KOKOU AGBOLOU

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


ABSTRACT

The purpose of the current study was to look for the relationships between emotional

intelligence competencies and General Job Satisfaction of employees of a furniture and

bedding distribution center located in a northeastern state. The emotional intelligence

competencies were measured by the new Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI) test –

University Version, and General Job Satisfaction score was scored by the Minnesota

Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). A random sample comprising 80 full-time employees

was selected from a target population of 200 full-time employees. A quantitative method

using correlational analysis was used to examine how the 12 emotional intelligence

competencies predicted the dependent variable of job satisfaction. The results of the

correlation analysis revealed that of the 12 emotional intelligence competencies, only

one, the influence competency, showed a significant positive relationship to General Job

Satisfaction (r (78) = .249, p < .05). The other competencies of emotional intelligence

were related to General Job Satisfaction, but the relationships were not significant. The

results analysis also revealed significantly positive correlations among the independent

variables of emotional intelligence competencies. The highest correlation among the

independent variables was found between conflict management competency and

inspirational leadership competency (r (78) = .809, p < .01). The present research study

did not find sufficient evidence to conclude any significant relationships between

emotional intelligence competencies and General Job Satisfaction.


iv

DEDICATION

The dissertation is dedicated to my wonderful family: my wife Michele and my

daughters Xena and Karen for staying by my side throughout this educational journey

and keeping me motivated. I dedicate the dissertation to my mother Madeleine who

showed me at an early age the importance of human capability and always told me that

education is the way to a brighter future. I dedicate the study to my late stepfather

Prosper who was an important support in my childhood. I dedicate my dissertation to my

sisters and brothers who have been supportive during my educational journey.

I would like to thank the employees of the distribution center for participating in

the study, and Macy’s Logistics and Operations for providing me the financial support

through executive tuition program. I would like to thank all of my managers and

colleagues for encouraging me during the process. Finally, I would like to thank the

wonderful people, too many to mention, who have helped me, advised and guided me to

achieve this academic goal.


v

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

There have been many people who have supported me on this journey. Without

them, this work could never have been successful. I owe an incalculable debt of gratitude

to people who helped, assisted, reviewed, edited and comforted me over the years. I

would like to acknowledge my mentor Dr. Orlando Ramos for being a mentor who

picked me up and guided me through to the finish line. I would acknowledge my

committee members Dr. Dean Blevins and Dr. Dean Finley for their constructive critics

and detailed guidance throughout the degree process. I would like to acknowledge Dr.

Norma Turner for her feedback and assistance in editing this paper.

I would also acknowledge the Vocational Psychology Research Department of the

University of Minnesota and the Hay Group Inc. for giving me the permission to use

Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire and Emotional and Social Competence Inventory

survey instruments in this study. Finally, for anyone I have missed, please forgive me and

accept my humblest apology.


vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... ix

LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................. x

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1

Background of the Problem .................................................................................. 2

Problem Statement ................................................................................................ 4

Purpose.................................................................................................................. 6

Significance of the Study ...................................................................................... 7

Nature of the Study ............................................................................................... 8

Research Question .............................................................................................. 10

Hypotheses .......................................................................................................... 10

Theoretical Framework ....................................................................................... 13

Definition of Terms............................................................................................. 17

Assumptions........................................................................................................ 19

Scope ................................................................................................................... 20

Limitations .......................................................................................................... 20

Delimitations ....................................................................................................... 21

Summary ............................................................................................................. 22

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................ 24

Documentation .................................................................................................... 24

Historical Overview ............................................................................................ 25

Emotional Intelligence and Job Satisfaction ....................................................... 31

Germinal Framework of Motivational Theories ................................................. 35


vii

Germinal Framework of Emotional Intelligence ................................................ 39

Germinal Framework of Organizational Change Theories ................................. 46

Independent Variables ........................................................................................ 49

Self-Awareness ................................................................................................... 52

Social-Awareness ................................................................................................ 52

Self-Management ................................................................................................ 52

Relationship Management .................................................................................. 52

Dependent Variable ............................................................................................ 55

Current Findings ................................................................................................. 56

Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 62

Summary ............................................................................................................. 63

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHOD .............................................................. 64

Research Method Appropriateness ..................................................................... 64

Informed Consent................................................................................................ 65

Sampling ............................................................................................................. 66

Confidentiality .................................................................................................... 67

Geographic Location ........................................................................................... 67

Instrumentation ................................................................................................... 67

Data Collection Procedures................................................................................. 71

Data Analysis ...................................................................................................... 75

Validity and Reliability ....................................................................................... 76

Summary ............................................................................................................. 78

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS .................................................................................... 79


viii

Hypotheses .......................................................................................................... 80

Findings............................................................................................................... 84

Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 89

Legend: ............................................................................................................... 92

CHAPTER: 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................... 93

Summary of Findings .......................................................................................... 93

Implications......................................................................................................... 94

Limitations .......................................................................................................... 95

Delimitations ....................................................................................................... 97

Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 98

Recommendations ............................................................................................... 99

Summary ........................................................................................................... 101

REFERENCES ................................................................................................. 102

APPENDIX A: LETTER OF INTRODUCTION............................................. 128

APPENDIX B: INFORMED CONSENT AGREEMENT ............................... 130

APPENDIX C: PERMISSION TO USE MSQ TEST ...................................... 132

APPENDIX D: COPYRIGHT PERMISSION LETTER ................................. 133

APPENDIX E: DOCUMENTATION .............................................................. 134

APPENDIX F: JOB SATISFACTION SCORES AND ECI SCORES ........... 148

APPENDIX G: SCATTERGRAMS 1-12 ........................................................ 155


ix

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Framework of Emotional Intelligence Competencies .........................................522

Table 2 Traits used in MSQ With Items Which Addressed Each Trait ............................855

Table 3 Participant Ethnicity by Gender given in Number and Percentage ...................877

Table 4 Descriptive Statistics of Variables in the Study ..................................................888

Table 5 Matrix Showing Correlation Coefficients between Variables ............................911


x

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Research design model.......................................................................................74

Figure 2. Participant Ages Established in Ranges .............................................................84


1

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Goleman (1998) asserted that emotional intelligence (EI) helps leaders to create in

the organization a climate of trust, respect and fairness susceptible to increase

performance and productivity. Boyatzis, Goleman, and McKee (2002) argued that

emotional intelligence was positively related to higher levels of success in the workplace.

Van Rooy and Viswesvaran (2004) concluded from the analysis of 69 studies that, “EI

should indeed be considered a valuable predictor of performance” (p. 87). According to

Emmerling and Goleman (2003), emotional intelligence accounted for variances in job

performance that cannot be explained by either intelligence quotient or technical skills.

Emotionally intelligent employees are more likely to demonstrate a better level of life

satisfaction (Law, Wong, & Song 2004; Sy, Tram, & O’Hara 2006).

Elfenbein (2006) implied that the performance of a team can be predicted by the

level of emotional intelligence of the team members. Other research studies have

associated emotional intelligence to higher motivational performances (Caruso, Mayer, &

Salovey, 2000a; Salovey & Mayer, 1990). While the literature and other related research

studies associated emotional intelligence to numerous improvements in work and life

outcomes (LePine, Erez, & Johnson, 2002), the research that links emotional intelligence

to job satisfaction in the context of organizational change was limited. The current study

analyzed the relationships between emotional intelligence competencies and General Job

Satisfaction of employees of a furniture and bedding distribution center located in a

northeastern state in the United States.

Chapter 1 introduces the purpose of the study and discusses the importance of this

topic in dealing with diverse challenges of job dissatisfaction that face the 21st century
2

economy. Chapter also describes the problem and presents the significance of the study,

nature, hypotheses, research question, theoretical framework, definitions, assumptions,

scope, limitations, and delimitations; and concludes with a summary and a preview of the

topics addressed in Chapter 2.

Background of the Problem

The increasing competitions, the fast technological development and the tougher

economic environment have dictated the rapid pace of changes that occur within today’s

retail industry (Broadbridge, Swanson, & Taylor, 2000). Thomas (2006) argued,

“Ambiguity, complexity, and chaos threaten our cozy self-defined world” (p. 311).

Bennis (1998) emphasized, “In the 21st century, we experience increasingly rapid

change, and to deal with change, we have to unhinge our organization” (p. 108).

Broadbridge et al. (2000) concluded, “Among the environmental stressors, many of

which can be associated with the changes occurring within the industry, was the highly

competitive and cutthroat nature of the industry, tight resources, customer attitudes and

threats of violence” (p. 419). Although the changes are important factors of success in the

modern workplace, they are also associated with environmental stressors that lead to job

dissatisfaction.

In order to maintain organizational competitive edge in today’s environment,

many retail organizations have shifted toward organizational strategies that allow the

delivery of higher customer satisfaction with limited resources. These strategies lead to

insufficient staff, work-overload, time pressures and other feelings that create a climate of

dissatisfaction among employees. Broadbridge et al. (2000) argued, “Many of the


3

technological changes that had been introduced were regarded as easing the participants’

jobs, but they also led to negative outcomes” (p. 422).

Issues relating to job security, work pressures, and deadlines have become the

highest concerns of employees within today’s retail organization. Gribben (2008) posited,

“Increasing pressure and workload, combined with office politics has raised stress levels,

particularly in bigger companies, although more managers are achieving a better

work/life balance” (p. 1). The work environment has consequently produced a climate of

uncertainty, frustration, alienation, and anxiety that results in a decreased in job

satisfaction, which Igbaria, Parasuraman, and Badawy (1994) defined as “a primary

outcome of work experiences that meet valued needs of individuals and thus represent a

key indicator of quality of work life” (p. 175). Bennis (1998) argued that today’s

organizational management must overcome to the difficult challenges of job

dissatisfaction in order to restore employees’ commitment and unleash their creativity to

benefit the organization.

More recent literature and research studies revealed that emotional intelligence

could assist in repairing negative feelings and restoring life satisfaction (Goleman, 1989).

Dulewicz and Higgs (2003), and Dunn (2004) argued that a lack of emotional intelligence

competencies such as self-awareness is associated with a decline in productivity, morale,

and effective decision-making in the workplace. Muchinsky (2004) conducted further

exploration of emotional intelligence in relation to other constructs. He envisioned that

the relationship between emotional intelligence and job performance would be fully

explored in the future. Limited research has been conducted linking emotional
4

intelligence to job satisfaction within the context of organizational psychology

(Muhammad, 2006).

A review of the literature on theoretical frameworks of employee’s job

satisfaction revealed that satisfaction in the workplace is associated with motivation.

Herzberg, Mausner, and Snyderman (1959) asserted that people are satisfied by hygiene

factors that are intrinsic within the work. According to Herzberg et al.’s (1959)

motivation-hygiene theory, these hygiene factors are motivators that create the feelings of

job satisfaction when they are present within the work environment, and when these

hygiene factors deteriorate to a level below what employees consider as acceptable,

employees become dissatisfied. Lange (2008) argued that Maslow’s (1954) hierarchy of

need theory provided the steps for work in the area of job satisfaction. According to

Maslow’s hierarchy of need theory, people satisfaction can be influenced by different

factors, depending on their level in the need hierarchy. The literature continues to discuss

job satisfaction, and “despite the more than 5,000 job satisfaction studies published

during the 20th century” (Lange, 2008, p. 2), limited educational studies explored the

relationships between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction in the context of

organizational change.

Problem Statement

With the increasing competition and continual change, many retail organizations

are faced with a new economic rationality that results in employee apathy and detrimental

behavior (Zeffane, 1993). Recent research studies concluded that emotional intelligence

can assist in repairing negative feelings and decreasing life’s dissatisfaction (Goleman,

1989). Self-management, which is one of the components of emotional intelligence,


5

includes the ability to control disruptive emotion, to think clearly, and to adapt to

situation (Berman & West, 2008). Emotional intelligence has also been shown to predict

employees’ motivation, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship (Sy et al.,

2006; Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2004), and life satisfaction (Martinez-Pons, 1997).

Identifying relationships between the subcategories of emotional intelligence and

job satisfaction was intended to help organizational leaders to become more aware of the

importance of human capability in the organization. Several studies dealt with emotional

intelligence and the workplace or productivity or dissatisfaction (Ajay Goyal, 2007;

Brown, 2005; Busso, 2003; Chernis & Goleman, 2001; Elfenbein, 2006; Hosseinian,

Fathi-Ashtiani, Yazdi, & Zahraie, 2008; Johnson, L., 2008; Millet, 2007; Muhammad,

2006). The purpose of the study was to build upon existing research studies on the impact

of emotional intelligence and job satisfaction by exploring the relationships between the

subcategories of emotional intelligence and job satisfaction in the context of

organizational change.

A correlational research study was conducted to explore the degree of the

relationships between emotional intelligence competencies and General Job Satisfaction

of a randomized sample of 80 full-time employees. The sample was selected from a total

population of 200 full-time employees of furniture and bedding retail distribution center

located in a northeastern state in the United States. The Minnesota Satisfaction

Questionnaire (MSQ) (Dawis, England, Lofquist, & Weiss, 1967) and the new Emotional

Competence Inventory Test - University Version (ECI) (Hay Group, 2006; Hay Group,

2007) were the instruments used to collect the data throughout this study.
6

Purpose

The purpose of this quantitative correlational study was to look for the

relationships between emotional intelligence competencies as measured by the ECI and

General Job Satisfaction as scored by the MSQ of employees of furniture and bedding

distribution center located in a northeastern state in the United States. The intervening

variables of ages, gender, and years of service at the furniture and bedding retail

distribution center were analyzed. The results of this study may provide additional

information and knowledge to develop emotional intelligence-based strategies that

mitigate the challenges of job dissatisfaction and enhance organizational performance in

a disruptive work environment. The dependent variable of the study was General Job

Satisfaction, the context was organizational change, and the independent variables were

emotional intelligence competencies as defined in the ECI test, “emotional self-

awareness, achievement orientation, adaptability, emotional self-control, positive

outlook, empathy, organizational awareness, conflict management, coach and mentor,

influence, inspirational leadership (and) teamwork” (Hay Group, 2007, p. 6).

The data collection instruments were the MSQ (Dawis, England et al., 1967) to

assess General Job Satisfaction and the ECI test - University Version (Hay Group, 2006;

Hay Group, 2007) to score emotional intelligence competencies. The population targeted

by the study consisted of 200 full-time employees of furniture and bedding retail

distribution center located in a northeastern state in the United States. The correlation

coefficient and descriptive statistics were used to examine the nature and the extent of the

relationships between job satisfaction and emotional intelligence competencies.


7

Significance of the Study

Literature has generally associated the experience of change as an influential

factor on employee effectiveness (Callan, Jones, & Martin, 2005). Employee attitudes

toward change have implication on employee commitment, absenteeism and turnover rate

(Adams, Eby, Gaby, & Russell, 2000; Freeman, McManus, Russell, & Rohricht, 1995;

Mack, Nelson, & Quick, 1998). If emotional intelligence competencies can positively

influence General Job Satisfaction, other experimental studies may help organizations to

identify the variable predictors in order to develop employee programs to increase job

productivity. The employee programs would be designed to encourage employees to use

their human capability to cope with the challenges of job dissatisfaction and to motivate

them to their full potential in a disruptive working environment.

By understanding in-depth the association between emotional intelligence

competencies and job satisfaction, retail organizations may develop business plans and

employee programs to mitigate the effect of job dissatisfaction and ease the stressors

experienced in today’s changing environment (Broadbridge et al., 2000). Employees,

whose perceptions of their organization and environment are positive, are more likely to

embrace change favorably, and display higher level of well-being and organizational

commitment (Callan et al., 2005). Successful organizations are the ones that initiate

appropriate actions, as the changes occur, to sustain job satisfaction and improve

productivity (Karl, 2000). Positive correlation between emotional intelligence and job

satisfaction could provide the opportunity to develop models of management, in which

employees are encouraged to develop their emotional intelligence abilities.


8

Nature of the Study

A correlational design was used to analyze the data collected from the sample of

80 full-time employees out of a total population of 200 full-time employees of furniture

and bedding retail distribution center located in a northeastern state in the United States.

Quantitative correlational method is more appropriate for this study because it allows the

investigator to show if the variables have positive or negative relationships. Creswell

(2003) argued that quantitative research methods are the most appropriate methods for

describing trends and explaining the extent of relationships between variables, while

qualitative research methods explore the topic to understand the central phenomenon. The

instruments to collect data were the ECI, which assesses emotional intelligence

competencies (Hay Group, 2006; Hay Group, 2007), and the MSQ to assess job

satisfaction (Dawis, England et al., 1967).

This study evaluated the relationships between the dependent variable General

Job Satisfaction and the independent variable of emotional intelligence competencies,

which are composed of competencies such as “emotional self-awareness, achievement

orientation, adaptability, emotional self-control, positive outlook, empathy,

organizational awareness, conflict management, coach and mentor, influence,

inspirational leadership, teamwork” (Hay Group, 2007, p. 6). ECI test organized

emotional intelligence competencies into four clusters, “self-awareness, social awareness,

self-management, and relationship management” (Hay Group, 2006, p. 3). Statistical

analysis tools were used to evaluate the degree or direction of the relationships between

job satisfaction and emotional intelligence. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize
9

the sample and to describe the data collected, and correlation statistics were used to

evaluate if the null hypotheses are true.

Each of the employees of furniture and bedding distribution center was assigned a

number, and a random number table was used in the selection of the sample to ensure that

the sample is representative of the target population. The study explored the extent of the

relationships between emotional intelligence competencies and General Job Satisfaction

of the sample. The correlational research design was suitable to this research because the

aim of the study was to find out the relationships between the independent variables

emotional intelligence competencies and the dependent variable job satisfaction. The

correlation research design, as argued in Brown (2005), helps examine the degree to

which “differences in one characteristic or variable are related to differences in one or

more other characteristics or variables” (Leedy & Ormrod, 2005, p. 191).

Correlational designs are critical in determining the significance of the correlation

between dependent and independent variables that have similar characteristics (Leedy &

Ormrod, 2005). The aim of the study was to determine the level of the relationships

between emotional intelligence competencies and General Job Satisfaction of a sample of

20 employees from each of four different locations of furniture and bedding distribution

center. While correlational studies do not show causality, the relationships revealed

through the correlations become a first step to showing associations between the variables

(Waters, n.d.).

The population of the organization selected for this study was composed of 200

employees (N = 200). For the purpose of the study, parametric statistical methods such as

correlation coefficient were used to determine the extent of the relationships between job
10

satisfaction and emotional intelligence. This study employed surveys questionnaires to

assess General Job Satisfaction score and emotional intelligence competencies scores of

the employees. The participants used Likert-type scale answer sheets to indicate how

significant certain behaviors and attitudes on the ECI have been in the workplace and the

extent to which they are not satisfied with the organization and its management. The data

collected were analyzed and compared.

Research Question

The changes that occur within today’s organization are one of the major

contributors to workplace stress and can be associated with a wide range of negative

behavioral, psychological, and physiological outcomes (Cooper & Roney, 1997; Cooper

& Schabracq, 1998). The following research question indicates the framework, in which

the study was conducted: Within the context of organizational change, what are the

relationships between emotional intelligence competencies as scored by ECI and General

Job Satisfaction as measured by MSQ of employees of furniture and bedding distribution

center located in northeastern state in the United States? The research question is posed to

determine the degree of the relationships that exist between emotional intelligence and

job satisfaction of employees within the context of organizational change.

Hypotheses

Ho1: There is no significant relationship between emotional self-awareness as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha1: There is a significant relationship between emotional self-awareness as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.
11

Ho2: There is no significant relationship between achievement orientation as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha2: There is a significant relationship between achievement orientation as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho3: There is no significant relationship between adaptability as defined by the

ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha3: There is a significant relationship between adaptability as defined by the

ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho4: There is no significant relationship between emotional self-control as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha4: There is a significant relationship between emotional self-control as defined

by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho5: There is no significant relationship between positive outlook as defined by

the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha5: There is a significant relationship between positive outlook as defined by the

ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho6: There is no significant relationship between empathy as defined by the ECI,

and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha6: There is a significant relationship between empathy as defined by the ECI,

and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho7: There is no significant relationship between organizational awareness as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.
12

Ha7: There is a significant relationship between organizational awareness as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho8: There is no significant relationship between conflict management as defined

by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha8: There is a significant relationship between conflict management as defined

by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho9: There is no significant relationship between coaching and mentoring as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha9: There is a significant relationship between coaching and mentoring as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho10: There is no significant relationship between influence, as defined by the

ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha10: There is a significant relationship between influence as defined by the ECI,

and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho11: There is no significant relationship between inspirational leadership as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha11: There is a significant relationship between inspirational leadership as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho12: There is no significant relationship between teamwork as defined by the

ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha12: There is a significant relationship between teamwork as defined by the ECI,

and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.


13

Theoretical Framework

The theories applicable to this study are organizational performance, and the

associations between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction within the context of

organizational change. The theory of motivation-hygiene of Herzberg et al.’s (1959)

contended that individuals are satisfied by hygiene factors that exist within the work.

When these factors deteriorate to a level below what individuals consider as acceptable,

individuals become dissatisfied and their motivation toward the work is impacted. To

understand job satisfaction or the attitude of people toward their works, Herzberg et al.

(1959) developed a theory that evaluates the attitudes of individuals toward their specific

job, the causes of the attitudes, and the consequences of the attitudes.

Herzberg et al. (1959) recognized two separate sets of factors. While the first set

of factors resulted in happy feelings and good attitudes, the second set of factors are

associated with feelings of unhappiness or bad feelings. Herzberg et al. concluded that

the factors that led to unhappiness are related directly to conditions surrounding a job and

not the job itself. According to Herzberg et al., the factors acknowledged as determinants

of job satisfaction are accomplishment, recognition, work, accountability, and progress.

In contrast, the factors that contributed to job dissatisfaction are company procedure and

regulation, management, salary, interpersonal relations, and working environment.

Despite some criticisms, Herzberg’s theory created additional knowledge to the existing

literature (Owens, 2004).

Maslow’s (1954) hierarchy of need theory provided the steps for work in the area

of job satisfaction. According to Maslow’s hierarchy of need theory, people satisfaction

can be influenced by different factors depending on their level in the need hierarchy.
14

Maslow’s theory contended that all needs are hierarchical, and as one need is satisfied,

other needs then take precedence. The hierarchical needs are the physiological set of

needs, the need for safety, the need to be loved, the need for esteem, and self-

actualization. The theories of Herzberg et al. (1959) and Maslow provided the basis of

understanding and evaluating the attitude of people relative to work.

The emotional intelligence theory has progressed throughout generations of

thoughts. Theorists considered emotion and cognition, as separate fields of study and

research (Busso, 2003). Busso noted that cognitive researchers have turned their attention

to human capacity to perform abstract reasoning, and emotion researchers have focused

on the relationship between biology and emotion. Salovey and Mayer (1990) expanded

the ability model, in which emotional intelligence is divided into four attributes: Ability

to identify and communicate emotion and to accurately assess them in the self and others,

ability to create ideas and thoughts using emotion and to associate emotions with

sensations, ability to comprehend emotions and their components and ramifications, and

ability to manage emotion in oneself and in others.

The pioneers of the mixed model are Bar-On (1998) and Goleman (1995, 1998).

The proponents of this model attributed emotional intelligence to a set of non-cognitive

dimensions. Bar-On classified these competencies into five categories: Intrapersonal

competency includes self-awareness, interpersonal focuses on social responsibility and

empathy, adaptability demonstrates problem solving ability and how one adapts to the

changing environment, stress management involves controlling impulses and showing

resilience under stress and assessment of the general mood entails confidence and

contentment. Goleman (1998) categorized the non-cognitive competencies into: Self-


15

awareness relates to self-confidence and emotional awareness, self-regulation relates to

innovation and trustworthiness, motivation, empathy, and social skills.

Emmerling and Goleman (2003) illustrated “a framework of emotional

intelligence that reflects how an individual's potential for mastering the skills of self-

awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management are

translated into success in the workplace” (p. 6). The framework is founded on emotional

intelligence attributes distinguishing outstanding performers from the average performers

that have been identified in research studies involving many corporations. Emotional

intelligence competencies were shown to be the factors that distinguish “between

outstanding and average performers” (Stubbs, 2005, p. 29) at work. Emotional

intelligence dimensions such as intrapersonal awareness and interpersonal ability, and a

narrow range of cognitive intelligence such as analytic thinking explained the difference

between top performers from average (Goleman, 1998).

Goleman (1998) argued that emotional intelligence account for about 90 % of

leader’s success. Other theorists have argued on the importance of intelligence in life and

Gardner (1999) added that people possess multiple intelligences. While moral

intelligence is the capacity of distinguishing between right and wrong (Gardner, 1999),

social intelligence is the aptitude to be aware of social phenomena and to respond

effectively to this awareness in individual and social level. Gardner asserted that people

with high-level morale intelligence are more aware of issues relating to personal, social,

and emotional behaviors. Social intelligence allows people to recognize their personal

ignorance and commitments.


16

Emotional intelligence, which involves the understanding of individuals and

others’ feelings in a way that facilitates guidance in decision making and action, is the

most current measure of social intelligence (Mayer & Salovey, 1993). Even though

Goleman (1995) predicted that emotional intelligence would “become increasingly

valued as a workplace asset in the year to come” (p. 160), some critics have written about

the theory and the measure of emotional intelligence.

Some critics have raised questions on the scientific viability of emotional

intelligence. Davies, Stankov, and Roberts (1998) contended that emotional intelligence

is an “elusive concept” (p. 989). According to Becker (2003), emotional intelligence is

“proven resistant to adequate measurement” (p. 194); and Matthews, Roberts, and

Zeidner (2002) contended, “EI appears to be more myth than science” (p. 547). In

contrast to these controversies, Mayer, Salovey, and Caruso (2004) contended,

“accumulating evidence indicates that EI, measured as ability, predicts a variety of

important outcomes” (p. 209).

Recent research on the theoretical model of how employee adapt throughout

organizational change revealed that employees who are optimistic about their

organization and environment also have a positive perception of change, and respond

better to change in terms of job satisfaction, happiness, dedication, and poorer

absenteeism (Callan et al., 2005). Although changes can lead to creativity and innovation,

changes can also lead to a loss of confidence within the workforce, increased in

employees’ turnover, and decreased in productivity. Goleman (1998) argued that

retention of employees, especially in a working environment going through changes, is a


17

matter of self and social awareness, which are the competencies of emotional intelligence

defined in the ECI.

A better understanding of organizational context is an important step in the

management of change. Callan et al. (2005) maintained that the literature connecting

organizational change to organizational outcomes is underdeveloped (Pettigrew,

Woodman, & Cameron, 2001). Research argued that employee's attitudes toward an

imminent change would have implication on organizational outcomes (Eby et al., 2000;

Mack et al., 1998; McManus et al., 1995).

Definition of Terms

The terms and concepts that were referenced throughout the current study are

defined here to clarify the readers’ understanding of the study.

Competencies are the blend of thoughtful skills, abilities, and specific qualities

that are intrinsic in people (Hay Group, 2006).

Emotions refer to the deepest feelings, passions and longings that are essential in

human life Goleman (1995) argued, “each emotion offers a distinctive readiness to act;

each points us in a direction that has worked well to handle the recurring challenges of

human life” (p. 4)

Emotional Competence Inventory is a 360-degree evaluation tool developed to

assess 20 social and emotional competencies (Hay Group, 2006). The tool assesses the

emotional competencies identified by Goleman (1998), and Boyatzis and Kolb's (1991)

self-assessment questionnaire. The ECI measures 20 emotional competencies categorized

into four dimensions, which are “self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and

relationship management” (Hay Group, 2006, p. 3).


18

Emotional intelligence: According to Brown (2005), the concept has been defined

differently by many authors. In the current study, emotional intelligence is the ability to

recognize ones' own feelings and the feelings of others; namely, to motivate oneself and

manage those feelings effectively (Hay Group, 2006). As stated by Goleman et al.

(2002), emotional intelligence is a means of assessing “how leaders handle themselves

and their relationships” (p. 6). Emotional intelligence engrosses the ability of dealing

appropriately with one's emotions, and managing interpersonal interactions.

Empathy is the ability to be aware of others ‘feelings and to use the

understanding to develop effective interpersonal relationships (Goleman, 2000).

Job satisfaction refers to employees’ level of satisfaction with their job or with

particular aspects of the job. Job satisfaction is enjoyable conditions resulting from the

way in which job condition align with employees expectation (Dawis & Lofquist, 1984).

As argued in Lange (2008), the concept of job satisfaction has evolved through

humanitarian, economic and theoretical perspectives and each of the perspectives has

contributed to the importance of job satisfaction. A humanitarian perspective resulted

from the ethical obligation of management to provide a pleasant work environment to

employees (Balzer et al., 1997), and the economic perspective helps one to understand

the correlation between job satisfaction and performance (Lange, 2008). The theoretical

perspective argues that job satisfaction is a critical factor in work motivation that can

predict behavior (Lange, 2008).

Organizational change refers to the system of implementation involved in the

transformation of an organization. In the present research study, the plurality of

organizational change theories will be addressed in terms of the four approaches to


19

change: rationalism, contextualism, disperalism, and constructionism (Caldwell, 2005).

Relationship management refers to how people manage relationship. This cluster

contains “conflict management, coach and mentor, influence, inspirational leadership and

teamwork” (Hay Group, 2007, p. 6).

Self-awareness is the ability of understanding one's internal states, feelings, and

intuitions. This cluster contains self-awareness competency and is defined as ability to

assess one’s feelings (Goleman, 2000; Hay Group, 2006).

Self-management is the ability of controlling ones' internal feelings, and

resources. This cluster includes the following competencies: “achievement orientation,

adaptability, emotional self-control, positive outlook” (Hay Group, 2007, p. 6).

Social awareness refers to the awareness of others’ emotions, desires, and

feelings. This cluster includes empathy and organizational awareness (Hay Group, 2006).

Assumptions

This study was built on the assumption that the behavior of the participants was

homogeneous to the behavior of the entire population. The sample selected to answer the

survey questionnaires is representative of the population of the furniture and bedding

distribution center. Although the survey instruments may provide participants with the

opportunity to distort the response to their advantage (Caruso et al., 2000b), the study

encouraged honest responses and the assumption is that participants provided accurate

answers to the survey questionnaires based upon viewpoints as opposed to providing

altered answers. The employees of the retail distribution center were aware of the purpose

of the study and their rights to participate or not to participate to the study. The

assumptions provide readers with the suppositions made in conducting the experiment.
20

The intervening variables such as of age, gender, and year of service in the distribution

center are representative in the sample size.

Scope

The scope of this study was limited to the independent variables emotional

intelligence competencies and the dependent variable General Job Satisfaction in the

context of organizational change. The study did not address concerns and issues other

than the ones listed in the research question. The population targeted comprised 200 full-

time employees of furniture and bedding retail distribution center located in a

northeastern state in the United States. If the study concludes on positive relationships

between emotional intelligence competencies and General Job Satisfaction, organizations

may use this additional knowledge to boost the effects of other job performance

determinants to maintain a high-level job satisfaction of the workforce in today’s working

environment characterized by uncertainty and unpredictability.

Limitations

A number of investigations supported the argument that cognitive intelligence

alone with specific job skills cannot explain the difference between average and higher

performers (Bryan, 2006; Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2004). As argued by Parker, Stone,

and Wood (2005), growing empirical research concluded, “the type of competencies most

closely linked with emotional intelligence is strongly linked with an individual’s ability

to cope with environmental demands and uncertainties” (p. 3). Although correlational

research methods can describe the nature and the extent to which the relationships exist

among variables, the presence of a relationship cannot determine whether one variable

caused an effect in other (Ryan & Sladyk, 2005). To understand if causality between
21

emotional intelligence and employee’s job satisfaction exists, experimental research

studies would be necessary.

While a limitation was the sample size selected for this study (n = 80, 40% of the

target population N = 200); the sampling method was a randomized technique, in which a

random number was assigned to the 200 full-time employees of the organization, and a

random number table was used to select the participants (Creswell, 2003). The

instrumentation encompasses limitations due to the subjectivity that is associated with

using a survey research approach. While correlational studies can suggest relationships

between variables, they cannot prove that one variable causes a change in another

variable (Ryan & Sladyk, 2005). Limitations and biases could be present in the selection

of the participants because of the limited sample size. Literature indicates that a limited

sample size may not include all individuals in the organization’s population (Leedy &

Ormrod, 2005), which presents a limitation that must be considered in generalizing the

findings.

The study was set to accept or to reject the null hypothesis at the .05 alpha levels.

Although the research design was sufficient to ensure validity and reliability, the findings

were not significant. The results could not be generalized to the entire furniture and

bedding retail industry.

Delimitations

The delimitations of the research design are associated with the characteristics

that limit the scope of the study. The possibility that the participants may distort the

surveys responses to their advantage, the time and year of the study, and the halo effect,
22

which is a cognitive bias whereby the perception of a particular ability is influenced by

the perception of the former ability.

Summary

In Chapter 1, discussion centered on the quantitative correlational research design

that was used to identify the relationships between emotional intelligence competencies

and General Job Satisfaction within the context of organizational change. The chapter

included discussion on the importance of the problem, the purpose, the importance of the

study, the nature of the study, and the assumptions. Goleman (1998) estimated that 90%

of leader’s success can be associated with emotional intelligence. Many investigations

support the argument that cognitive intelligence alone with technical and technological

skills cannot explain the variation between standard and higher performance among the

employees (Bryan, 2006; Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2004). Goleman (1998) explained

that emotional intelligence is more significant to organizations than intelligence quotient.

The study was conducted to determine if positive relationships existed between

emotional intelligence competencies and General Job Satisfaction. Organizational leaders

may use emotional intelligence to boost the effects of other job performance determinants

to increase the level of job satisfaction in today’s increasingly competitive workplace.

The correlational research study determined the nature and the extent of the relationships

among the variables studied but as a correlational research study, the outcomes of the

study cannot logically suggest causal relationships between the variables (Ryan &

Sladyk, 2005). As argued by Barr Kamil, Mosenthal, and Pearson (2002), “High

correlation values should suggest causal relationships. Such suggested relationships have

to be verified by other experimental means” (p. 48).


23

Chapter 2 reviews the literature related to emotional intelligence, job satisfaction,

and organizational change. The review of the literature outlines relevant organizational

performance theories, job satisfaction and dissatisfaction theories, and organizational

change theories.
24

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

The purpose of this quantitative correlational study was to identify the

relationships between emotional intelligence competencies as defined by ECI and

General Job Satisfaction as defined by MSQ within the context of organizational change.

The rapid change occurring in today’s world affects retail organizations and their

performance (Broadbridge et al., 2000). The new era has introduced a highly competitive

market that prompts organizational leaders to favor economic strategies such as mergers

and acquisitions; as well as, outsourcing specific functions and tasks of the organization.

Appelbaum, Simpson, and Shapiro (1987a) argued today’s increasingly competitive

business environment and globalization have induced many organizations to downsize.

Although these strategies may be cost effective, they tend to decrease employees’ trust,

motivation, confidence, and commitment toward their organization.

Broadbridge et al. (2000) argued, “many of the technological changes that had

been introduced were regarded as easing the participants’ jobs, but they also led to

negative outcomes” (p. 422). Chapter 1 described the problem, presented the purpose of

the study, and discussed the significance of the study. The purpose of the literature

review is to justify the importance of the study by examining the literature relevant to

emotional intelligence and job satisfaction.

Documentation

A review of academic journals and articles relating to emotional intelligence and

job satisfaction was performed to analyze the research and evaluate existing knowledge

on the topics. Among the repertoire of articles and journals reviewed were Academy of

Management Journal, American Journal of Sociology, and Journal of Social and


25

Psychological Sciences. When searching the major journal and articles database such as

Cambridge Scientific Abstract, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, ProQuest Base, ERIC,

Scirus, and Gale PowerSearch, the keywords job satisfaction, emotional intelligence, and

organizational change were used. The outcome was considerable however few studies

have focused on employees of a distribution center within the context of organizational

change, indicating a need to further explore the domain. A large amount of research

studies have investigated the topic of emotional intelligence (Appendix E includes a table

of peer-reviewed journals, research articles, and dissertations that discussed the

relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction from 2003 to 2009). The

present study pursued the association between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction

within the context of organizational change.

Historical Overview

Academic institutions focused on the importance of logical and linguistic

intelligences, which are the cornerstone of the intelligence quotient. In the early 1940s,

Wechsler argued on the importance of non-intellectual skills in predicting individual's

aptitude to succeed in life. Payne (1986) introduced the emotional intelligence into the

academic field when attempting to demonstrate the negative impact of a civilized society

on people’s emotional growth. He discussed how individuals have tried to civilize

themselves by denying their emotional nature. Payne argued the evolution of “the

civilized world has stifled our growth emotionally, leading us down a path of emotional

ignorance” (para. 2).

In their effort to develop a scientific method to measure the difference between

an individual's emotional ability, Salovey and Mayer (1990) discovered that some
26

individuals are better than others such as identifying their own and others' feelings and

solving emotional issues. According to Salovey and Mayer, the interpersonal intelligence,

which is the subset of Gardner’s personal intelligences, is conceptualized in relation to

emotional intelligence that “involves the ability to monitor others’ moods and

temperaments and to enlist such knowledge into the service of predicting their future

behavior” (p. 189). Salovey and Mayer included the regulation of emotion in the

dimension of emotional intelligence, and explain that “emotional intelligent individuals

may enhance their own and others’ moods and even manage emotion so as to motivate

others charismatically toward a worthwhile end” (p. 198). Emotional intelligence may

enhance organizational management’s ability to create a climate that transforms

employees into action-oriented individuals. This can be accomplished through a balance

of the need to accomplish corporate goals, with attention to relationships and promoting a

friendly and cooperative behavior in the workplace.

With the increasing diversity in the 21st century workforce, social-awareness

competence may allow individuals to read accurately the emotion in others and to work

toward satisfactory collaboration that benefits the organization. ECI test organized

emotional intelligence competencies into four domains of emotional intelligence, in

which people, especially leaders, must improve their skills to stay competitive. Emotional

intelligence provides individuals the ability to persevere in formulating strategies, to

manage conflict and maintain healthy working relationships (Busso, 2003).

In today’s information technology-driven age, organizations must rely on an

effective team effort to accomplish complex goals. If this study concluded the existence

of a relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction, the results may
27

increase the understanding of organizational managers of the connection between

developing emotional intelligence skills as management tools to enhance employee job

satisfaction within a workforce that is going through organizational restructuring.

Recognizing that emotional intelligence skills would only serve as tools, should such a

relationship exist, the value of the EI skills would need to be considered along with other

management skills.

Today’s new era presses organizations and their employees to increase

productivity. According to Brooks (2006), occupational stress is often linked with

emotions that would lead to job dissatisfaction. Brooks claimed that the increasingly

rapid change in today’s organization increases employee stress-related anxieties.

Appelbaum, Everard, and Hung (1999) contended that while numbers of employees lose

their employment in today’s highly competitive world, those who remain in the job suffer

more negative effects such as a high level of stress, conflict, ambiguity, mistrust, and job

dissatisfaction.

The work environment has prompted many organizations to adopt strategies such

as downsizing, mergers, and acquisitions (Appelbaum, Simpson et al., 1987a), to stay

competitive. In their recent study, Davis, J., Savage, Stewart, and Chapman (2003)

concluded that a positive relationship exists between individual's stress levels and

organizational downsizing. Another factor discussed in the literature as related to

organizational change, is job insecurity. Employees are concerned about job stability, as

they acknowledge changes or reorganization occurring in their workplace. This concern

for job insecurity creates an environment of high level of stress, conflict, role ambiguity,

and mistrust (Appelbaum, Simpson, & Shapiro, 1987b), which impacts performance and
28

job satisfaction.

As in Prins (2006), Cartwright and Cooper (1997) asserted that the change in

today’s world produced consequences such as “job securities, corporate culture clashes,

different styles of managerial leadership and--inevitable stress” (p. 2). Organizational

commitment is an essential aspect that plays a significant role in the working

environment. Brooks (2006) pointed out that when change occurs, “individuals begin to

experience change in their level of organizational commitment” (p. 48). Gaertner and

Nollen (1989) claimed, “Commitment is higher among employees who believe they are

being treated as resources to be developed rather than commodities to buy and sell” (p.

987). Leaders must be aware of this fact and update their management style with skills

that respond to these values in order to create in their organization a climate of

community and cohesion.

Employees’ job satisfaction is influenced by the fast development of today’s

organizational strategies. C. Davis (1996) argued that the social environment of today’s

organization could alienate employees when the organization is isolated from the

interests and feelings of the people who comprise the entity. Scott (2003) asserted that

employees “are driven by feelings and sentiments as much as the facts and interests . . .

and also act as members of social groups where loyalties are often stronger than

individual self-interests" (p. 57).

To promote a high level of job satisfaction, leaders must redesign their leadership

roles to create an environment in which employees are accepted as a valued resource

(Bennis, 1998). The importance of creating a social climate to generate intellectual

capital in the organization was emphasized by Bennis. Emotional intelligence may


29

enhance the employees’ recognition and understandings of the challenges that face

today’s organization and help them adopting a behavior conducive in repairing the

negative outlooks and improving job satisfaction. Emotional intelligence is shown to

provide support to strategic leaders in today’s organization. Goleman (1998b) concluded

from a research study of 40 companies that the strength of top performers is 27% related

to cognitive ability and 53% related to emotional intelligence ability.

Spencer and Spencer (1993) stated that 18 out of 21 competencies are based in

emotional intelligence when distinguishing the top performers from the average

performers. Organizations must encourage emotional intelligence competencies

susceptible to generate an emotional boost and spread positive feelings among employees

in order to increase organizational performance. Giesecke (2007) asserted that contrary to

negative emotions that can create a toxic environment and overwhelm employee

concentration, positive feelings can enhance employee performance. Druskat and Wolff

(2001) contended that high emotional intelligence among employees can increase

organizational performance. Shepherd-Osborne (2009) recommended from a study

among early childhood educators to include emotional intelligence assessment into

childhood educators hiring process to increase satisfaction and organizational

commitment. As stated by Cameli (2003), literature emphasizes the importance of

studying the role of emotional intelligence in successful leadership. He argued that

emotional intelligent people are more likely to display successful leadership skill in the

workplace than people with less emotional intelligence competencies.

Bailie and Ekermans (2006) reported that the common denominator of emotional

intelligence in the organization is that emotional intelligent people are more likely to
30

display effective leadership skills than people less emotionally intelligent people.

Research pioneered by Goleman (1998) suggested that emotional intelligence can better

predict a successful career than the conventional intelligence quotient. In various research

studies and related literature, the emotional quotient is considered complementary to the

intelligence quotient in the determination of success in life (Barone, McCarthy, Sojka, &

Tucker, 2000). Cognitive intelligence coupled with only technological knowledge fail to

provide today’s employees the edge needed to overcome work environment challenges.

As argued in Barone et al. (2000), Schmidt (1997) maintained that leaders must be skilled

in personal and social competencies in order to “recognize and respond to the emotions

and feelings of others, as well as the skill to help others manage their emotions” (para. 9).

A recent study conducted by Bailie and Ekermans (2006) demonstrated an

existence of “various relationship between emotional intelligence and the customer focus,

building working relationships, gaining commitment, developing others problem solving

and stress tolerance leadership competencies” (p. 9). Although a large amount of

literature relating to emotional intelligence exists (Brown, 2005), limited research that

explores the associations between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction among

employees of a retail organization could be located. The present quantitative correlational

study responded to the need for further study in the field of emotional intelligence to add

to the existing literature. The table in Appendix E illustrates a list of peer-reviewed

journals, research articles, and dissertations that discuss the relationship between

emotional intelligence and job satisfaction from 2003 to 2009.


31

Emotional Intelligence and Job Satisfaction

In 2008, L. Johnson conducted a study to explore the relationship between servant

leadership characteristics, emotional intelligence, and job satisfaction among high tech

employees in the aerospace industry. The findings of the study, using a quantitative

correlational design, did not conclude on a significant link between servant leadership

and emotional intelligence and the relationship between emotional intelligence and job

satisfaction was not significant. The present study was designed to focus on the

subcategories of emotional intelligence and job satisfaction among employees of a retail

distribution center, the goal of which would add to the existing knowledge on this topic.

Other researchers conducting studies on emotional intelligence and job

satisfaction during the last decade also learned that emotional intelligence competencies

do not always relate to job satisfaction (Chiva & Alegre, 2008; Coco, 2009; Dong &

Howard, 2006; Feyerabend, 2009; Ford, 2010; Guleryuz, Guney, & Aydn, 2008; Hendee,

2002; Johnson, 2010; Millet, 2007; Muhammad, 2006; Pardee, 2009; Platsidou, 2010;

Stewart, 2008; Teehan, 2006; Wong, C-S, Wong, P-M, & Peng, 2010). Roberts (2006)

conducted an examination of the nature and strength of the relationship between a sense

of humor and job satisfaction among students in graduate business programs. The results

supported the belief that no significant relationships existed among a sense of humor,

emotional intelligence, and job satisfaction, while Shepherd-Osborne (2009) found a

moderate relationship between EI and job satisfaction (r = .418, p < .05).

Emotional intelligence has been related to various organizational outcomes such

as organizational performance and commitment (LePine, Erez, & Johnson, 2002). Sy,

Tram, and O'Hara (2006) stated that little is known about EI as it pertains to the
32

relationship between job satisfaction and emotional intelligence in general in retail

corporations. EI is a complex concept, with several inventories and questionnaires

available to measure the process, including the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional

Intelligence Test (MSCEIT), the Emotional Quotient Inventory, the Emotional

Intelligence Appraisal survey, the Emotional Intelligence Assessment, along with others.

All the tests measure many of the same EI capacities. Bar-On (1998) himself reported a

moderate relationship between total EI scores and job satisfaction.

Emotional Intelligence and Educators

Several studies were performed to discern the relationship between emotional

intelligence and the teaching process. Brackett, Palomera, Mojsa-Kaja, Reyes, and

Salovey (2010) studied the relationship between emotion-regulation ability, burnout

found among so many teachers, and job satisfaction among British secondary-school

teachers. Platsidou (2010) conducted a study to determine the relationships between the

competencies of emotional intelligence of special education teachers in Greece, burnout

and job satisfaction. Based upon her study of 123 teachers, Platsidou determined that

emotional intelligence had little relationship with burnout or job satisfaction.

Reflecting the same results, the study conducted by C-S. Wong, P-M. Wong, and

Peng (2010) was designed to determine the relationship between EI and job satisfaction

on teachers and mid-level leaders in schools in Hong Kong. The first part of their study

included 107 participants who listed the attributes of successful mid-level leaders in the

schools. The second part of the study included 3866 teachers and mid-level leaders who

took the Emotional Quotient Inventory and the Job Satisfactions Survey. On the post-

secondary level, Coco (2009) studied the relationship between EI and job satisfaction
33

within 111 business students. Teehan (2006) studied the relationship among EI, humor,

and job satisfaction in 103 MBA students at a Midwestern university.

Studies were also conducted with nursing students. Guleryuz, Guney, and Aydn

(2008) studied the role of job satisfaction with regard to EI and organizational

commitment. Working with 267 participants, the researchers found little relationship

between the two variables. McCallin and Bamford (2007) interviewed and observed 44

members of interdisciplinary health teams to study the influence of EI in team

satisfaction and outcomes. Working from the position that technical knowledge and

cognitive intelligence are not sufficient for positive teamwork outcomes, the researchers

discerned that attention to EI could improve the experience of satisfaction of the

members of the interdisciplinary health teams.

Emotional Intelligence and Business

The business arena has served as a fertile ground for the study of EI and job

satisfaction and various areas of business life. Feyerabend (2009) studied the relationship

between EI, demographics, and job satisfaction among 299 Indian call center agents and

their commitment to remain on the job. In the United States, Stewart (2008) studied the

relationship among EI, job satisfaction, and organization learning commitment with 110

employees using the Emotional Quotient Inventory. Chiva and Alegre (2008) focused on

EI and job satisfaction with 157 participants. Muhammad studied 200 graduate students

who worked in various industries and job positions, using the Emotional Intelligence

Quotient and the Job Descriptive Index which included the Job in General Scale. In her

study, Muhammad determined that EI was not related to job satisfaction, yet she

considered EI still relevant both in business and academia. In all the studies on EI and
34

Job Satisfaction, none factored out the competencies comprising EI relative to Job

Satisfaction. The purpose of the present study was to further explore the relationships

between each of the emotional intelligence competencies defined in ECI and General Job

Satisfaction of employees of furniture and bedding distribution center located in a

northeastern state in the United States.

Emotional Intelligence and Other Applications

Among the studies considered, Ford (2010) conducted a study on EI and job

satisfaction at a large healthcare organization, based upon the results from 23

participants. Using the Emotional Judgment Inventory, the Maslach Burnout Inventory,

and the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, Pardee (2009) studied 187 mental health

professionals in terms of EI and job satisfaction. Millet (2007) conducted similar study

with 90 police officers, using the Emotional Quotient Inventory and the Job in General

Scale. The study by Dong and Howard (2006) involved 214 staff members from 36

medical offices.

The hypotheses in their study were both accepted: When employees have high EI

and trust in their coworkers, the more likely they are satisfied with their jobs. The fact

that the majority of the participants were women remained an unknown or intervening

variable. Hendee (2002) conducted a study on the relationship between EI and job

satisfaction with 65 practicing chefs and culinary educators. Hendee used the MSCEIT

and Spector’s Job Satisfaction Survey.

Although EI has been linked to various organizational outcomes such as job

performance and job retention (LePine, Erez, & Johnson, 2002), much remains to be

studied on the relationship between job satisfaction and emotional intelligence (Sy, Tram,
35

& O’Hara, 2006). Most studies failed to find strong relationships between EI and job

satisfaction, reflecting Bar-On’s (1997) report of a modest relationship between total EI

scores and job satisfaction. Despite the growing amount of studies that have failed to

support the existing of significant relationship between EI and job satisfaction, the

current study is nonetheless warranted and the findings would add important information

to the existing knowledge. Creswell (2005) argued that studies are worthy of research

when they involve expanding or replicating previous research studies by looking at

different population and variables in order to make original contribution to the body of

knowledge. Understanding the association between the dimensions of EI and job

satisfaction among retail distribution center employees within the context of

organizational change would provide organization with additional knowledge that could

help developing employee programs to cope with the challenge of job dissatisfaction

experienced in today’s changing retail organization (Broadbridge et al., 2000).

Germinal Framework of Motivational Theories

A review of the literature on theoretical framework of job satisfaction indicated

the concept of job satisfaction is associated with motivation. Lange (2008) argued,

“Humanitarian, economic, and theoretical concerns contribute to the importance and

popularity of job satisfaction” (p. 2). To understand job satisfaction, a historical review of

motivational theories is necessary.

Taylor Scientific Management Theory

The Taylor scientific management theory, also known as Taylorism, analyzed and

synthesized the workflows in the organization to improve productivity. Taylor (1911)

believed that scientific management cannot work unless employees benefit. He argued
36

that employees are motivated by pay, and developed the theory of scientific management

on the basis of pay as the motivating factor to maximize productivity.

Mayo Human Relations Theory

In contrast to scientific management theory in which monetary is the motivating

factor, Mayo’s Hawthorne experiences concluded that meeting employees’ needs is the

motivating factor (Mayo, 1933). Employee recognition, security and sense of belonging

are important needs in determining employees’ morale and productivity than the physical

condition in the work environment (Mayo, 1933). In a study on turnover at Philadelphia

textile mill, Mayo (1933) concluded that eliminating the factors contributing to the

work’s fatigue and allowing workers to manage their own work could motivate the

workforce and increase productivity.

Mayo’s (1933) experience at the Western Electric Hawthorne began with the

intention to increase productivity with better illumination of the workplace. Mayo

realized that lighting did not influence productivity. Rather, allowing the workers to

express their thoughts had a therapeutic effect that contributed to the results (Lange,

2008). In a study to investigate the cause of absenteeism in the workplace, Mayo (1933)

concluded that having enlightened management about human relations increased

employees’ motivation to go to work. Mayo’s research studies concluded on relationships

between employee satisfaction, turnover, absenteeism, and productivity.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Need Theory

Maslow developed a theory of personality and motivation in which people moved

up in the pyramid of need when each level is satisfied. Maslow has set up five
37

hierarchical needs: Physiological needs, needs for safety, social needs, needs to feel

important, and self-actualization needs. Maslow believed that people are stimulated by

unsatisfied needs, and as each need is satisfied, employees move to the next need in the

hierarchy. Lange (2008) argued, “The hierarchy of need pyramid contributed in

establishing factor shown to satisfy many persons in employment situations” (p. 17).

Motivation-Hygiene Theory

Herzberg et al. (1959) asserted that people are satisfied by hygiene factors that are

intrinsic within the work. Herzberg et al. (1959) argued that the intrinsic factors are

motivators that create the feelings of job satisfaction when they are present within the

work environment; and when these hygiene factors deteriorate to a level below what

employees consider as acceptable, employees become dissatisfied. Herzberg et al. (1959)

identified the motivation factors that lead to satisfaction as accomplishment, appreciation,

work, responsibility, and development; and the hygiene factors that contribute to

dissatisfaction as company procedure, supervision, employer relationship, work

condition, salary, and relationship with peers. While Herzberg’s motivation hygiene

theory is still well regarded in management, some criticisms related to the separation

between satisfaction and dissatisfaction, and the assumption that satisfied employees

outperform exist (Owens, 2004).

Situational Occurrences

According to Quarstein, McAfee, and Glassman (2002), the situational

occurrences theory of job satisfaction is determined by two factors. The theory posited

that job satisfaction results from situational occurrences, and that job satisfaction can be

determined by a mixture of situational occurrences rather that a single situation. The


38

situational theory of Quarstein et al. did not take in consideration personal factors in

determining job satisfaction, and the theory was not independently tested.

Positive Psychology

Seligman, Parks, and Steen (2004) described positive psychology as the study of

positive emotion and positive character. Positive psychology is concerned about the

circumstances and practices that lead to people success. Within the work environment,

positive psychology helps support the empowerment and motivation of employees within

a difficult situation.

Job Satisfaction

Job satisfaction is the key variable in organizational study (Kinicki, McKee-Ryan,

Schriesheim, & Carson, 2002) that is most investigated in industrial-organizational

psychology (Harter & Schmidt, 2006). Research studies reveal that job satisfaction is

pivotal to a variety of organizational outcomes. It contributes to restoring organizational

commitment (Fumham & Petrides, 2006), enhancing job performance (Harter & Schmidt,

2006), improving organizational citizenship behavior among employees (Fisher, 2003),

avoiding employee withdrawal (Price, 2001), and absenteeism (Tharenou, 1993). Job

satisfaction refers to employees’ level of satisfaction with their job or with particular

aspects of that job.

The literature reveals a progression in the definition of job satisfaction. Maslow

(1954) viewed job satisfaction as necessary condition in meeting human needs and Porter

(1962) described it as a summation of an individual’s expectations of the job. Busso

(2003) asserted that the recent and comprehensive definition of the concept comes from
39

Dawis and Lofquist (1984), who defined job satisfaction as a “pleasurable affective

condition resulting from one’s appraisal of the way in which the experienced job situation

meets one’s needs, values and expectations” (p. 72).

Various theories have defined job satisfaction, according to the factors to which

they attribute job satisfaction. Greewald and Klingner (1994) outlined two theories,

which are the single-factor theory and complex-factor theory. Single-factor theories

attribute job satisfaction to a single variable such as social or economic rewards, gender,

age, marital status, and parenthood (Busso, 2003). Proponents of complex-factor theories

argued that job satisfaction is rarely attained because once an individual’s need is

satisfied; a higher order need arises (Busso, 2003). Bridwell and Wahba (1976)

distinguished two theories that fall under the complex-factor motivation:

1. The expectancy theory attributed employees’ job satisfaction to the expectation

of reward and can be caused by intrinsic and extrinsic factors (Busso, 2003).

2. The interactive theory stressed the dynamic relationship between employees

and their organization as well as the congruence of employee and the organization

(Bridwell & Wahba, 1976).

Germinal Framework of Emotional Intelligence

The emotional intelligence concept has progressed throughout generations of

thought. From 1900 to 1969, theorists considered emotion and cognition, as separate

fields of study and research (Busso, 2003). Busso noted that cognitive researchers have

turned their attention to human capacity to perform abstract reasoning, and emotion

researchers have focused on the relationship between biology and emotion. The last

several decades have presented an increase of studies that combine intelligence with the
40

concept of emotion into the field called behavior cognition and affect. Wechsler (1958)

referred to emotional intelligence as the non-cognitive intellective aspects of general

intelligence. Wechsler (1958) defined intelligence as “the aggregate or global capacity of

the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with his (or

her) environment” (p. 7).

Emotional intelligence did not receive significant enthusiasm and attention,

especially in the business world until Goleman’s (1995) publication. Goleman (2001)

defined emotional intelligence as personal abilities that one can learn to outperform at

work (Prins, 2006). Two models of emotional intelligence emerged: The ability model

and mixed model.

Salovey and Mayer (1990) developed the ability model, in which emotional

intelligence is divided into four attributes, which the individual’s ability is to: (a) perceive

and express feelings and to accurately assess them in the self and others, (b) create ideas

and thoughts using emotion and to associate emotions with sensations, (c) understand

emotions and their components and ramifications, and (d) manage emotion in oneself and

in others. The pioneers of the mixed model are Bar-On (1998) and Goleman (1995,

1998), have attributed emotional intelligence to a set of non-cognitive competencies.

Bar-On (1998) classified these competencies into five categories: (a) intrapersonal

competency includes self-awareness, (b) interpersonal focuses on social awareness and

empathy, (c) adaptability demonstrates problem-solving ability and how one adapts to the

changing environment, (d) stress management involves controlling impulses and showing

resilience under stress, and (e) assessment of the general mood entails optimism and

pleasure. Goleman's (1998) categorization of emotional intelligence dimensions include


41

the following: (a) self-awareness relates to self-confidence and emotional awareness, (b)

self-regulation relates to innovation and trustworthiness, (c) motivation outlines initiative,

optimism, and achievement, (d) empathy illustrates political awareness and

understanding of others, and (e) social skills consists of teamwork, influence, and conflict

management.

Mayer and Salovey (1997) defined the new yardstick of emotional intelligence as

“the ability to perceive emotions, to access and generate emotions so as to assist thought,

to understand emotions (and emotional knowledge), and to reflectively regulate emotions

so as to promote emotional and intellectual growth” (p. 5). Weisinger (1998) stated that

emotional intelligence is “the intelligence use of emotions: you intentionally make your

emotions work for you by using them to help to guide your behavior and thinking in ways

that enhance your results” (p. 26). Goleman (1995) emphasized that “abilities such as

being able to motivate oneself and persist in the face of frustrations; to control impulse;

to regulate one’s moods and keep distress from swamping the ability to think; to

empathize and to hope” (p. 34). The results of this study would help organizational

leadership to establish conflict-management systems that restore trust and motivation

necessary to maintain employees' satisfaction in a changing environment.

The new leadership paradigm that results from today’s technological work

environment must include individuals skilled in interpersonal ability in order to bring

innovation and creativity to the changing workplace (Bennis, 1998). To gain competitive

edge in the 21st century, one must attain cognitive intelligence or theoretical knowledge;

as well as, interpersonal and intrapersonal abilities to interact effectively with others in

the global environment (Barone et al., 2000). These abilities are included in the self-
42

awareness and social awareness that are the competencies of emotional intelligence.

Leaders are evaluated on how well they interact with one another to establish a creative

atmosphere and coordinate the efforts in achieving the organization's objectives.

Goleman (1998) has broadened emotion intelligence in the business world by arguing its

significance as a prerequisite for performing well in business and as an essential element

for team performance. In comparing the top successful leaders with the average leaders,

Goleman (1998b) reported, “nearly 90 percent of the difference in their profiles was

attributable to emotional intelligence rather than cognitive abilities” (p. 94).

Based on the outcome of studies on managerial derailment that indicated a

positive relationship between derailment and the lack of emotional intelligence abilities,

Barone et al. (2000) recommended incorporating emotional intelligence skills in business

school curriculum in order to ensure students' successful career. To effectively manage

the diversity and the pace at which technological and social events influence the working

environment, individuals at every level of the organizational hierarchy, especially

leaders, need to be skilled in both interpersonal and intrapersonal abilities that are

categorized under the concept of emotional intelligence (Bennis, 1998).

The present study evaluated the degree of the relationships between emotional

intelligence competencies, as defined in the ECI test (Hay Group, 2006; Hay Group,

2007) and General Job Satisfaction defined in the MSQ scores (Dawis, England et al.,

1967). The objective of the research study was to determine the existence of relationships

between the independent variables of the subcategories of emotional intelligence and the

dependent variable of job satisfaction. If positive relationships between the subcategories

of emotional intelligence competencies and General Job Satisfaction exist, the results of
43

the study could provide additional knowledge that a connection exists between one or

more EI subcategories and job satisfaction in today’s continual changing environment.

Salovey and Mayer (1990) defined emotional intelligence as “the subset of social

intelligence that involves the ability to monitor one’s own and others’ emotions, to

discriminate among them, and to use information to guide one’s thinking and actions” (p.

189). The rapid change in today’s world presents new work environments, in which

people are not just being evaluated on their cognitive intelligence or intelligent quotient,

and theoretical and technological competences. Rather, individuals are evaluated on their

adaptability to new circumstances, which is the domain of emotional intelligence (Barone

et al., 2000).

Emotional intelligence is the collection of personal and social competencies that

differentiate the top performers from the average performers in the workplace (Stubbs,

2005) as well as the harmonic relationship to coordinate the individuals toward their

overall life success (Goleman, 1998). The normative perspective of organization uses the

value of emotion as the rational models of organizational behavior. Matthews, Roberts,

and Zeidner (2002) contended that individuals with higher emotional intelligent are likely

to rebound from negative feelings and increase life satisfaction. Mayer and Salovey

(1997) stated that the new yardstick of emotional intelligence as “the ability to perceive

emotions, to access and generate emotions so as to assist thought, to understand emotions

and (emotional knowledge), and to reflectively regulate emotions so as to promote

emotional and intellectual growth” (p. 5).

The rapid development of information technology and the increasing competition

experienced over the previous decade has shifted the organization's strategy toward
44

flexibility and innovation (Bennis, 1998). To gain the competitive advantage in today’s

markets, organizations must utilize technology to optimize existing resources, increase

productivity, and cut costs. Organizations have opted to direct their strategic planning

toward downsizing, mass lay-offs and mergers that have created conflicts, mistrust, and

job dissatisfaction in the workplace (Appelbaum, Simpson et al., 1987b). Meta-analysis

attributes approximately 5% of the variance in job performance across occupations to

emotional intelligence (Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2004).

The changing work environment can no longer provide secure jobs and related

benefits; consequently, employees have become frustrated and concerned about their

future. Mone (1997) argued that job insecurity, uncertainty, lack of loyalty, and higher

stress level introduced into today’s workplace are negatively affected by lower level of

trust, which can lead to conflicts. These factors influence job satisfaction, which has been

found to be pivotal in sustaining organizational commitment (Fumham & Petrides, 2006),

job performance (Harter & Schmidt, 2006), as well as employees’ departure (Price, 2001)

and absenteeism (Tharenou, 1993). To overcome these challenges resulting from

increasing competition and work environment changes, a new vision of leadership is

needed. Traditional leadership, based exclusively on formal relationships between leaders

and employees, may have possibly become too inconsistent and obsolete to assimilate

these issues in a meaningful way.

Today’s economy has become more familiar with contextual instability, various

pressures, and the shrinkage cycle of organizational growth. This shift in paradigm

brought consequences such as job cuts and a low level of trust in the workplace

(Broadbridge et al., 2000). In their work on the new economy, Broadbridge et al. (2000)
45

noted that the alienation caused by the consequences of the new economic rationality

greatly influences the morale of the employees. Employees are more concerned about

issue such as job insecurity (Broadbridge et al., 2000), which has eroded their sense of

loyalty. Busso (2003) argued that while task performance focuses on the technical aspect

of the workplace, contextual performance requires non-technical skills such as

discretionary behaviors that help employees to out-perform expectations to make the

organization more effective.

Emotional intelligence theorists contended that emotional intelligence could

predict contextual performance (Busso, 2003). A growing research is available regarding

the relationship between the subcategories of emotional intelligence and job satisfaction.

The current study was intended to provide additional knowledge to the existing literature

by investigating the relationships between emotional intelligence competencies and job

satisfaction among employees of a distribution center. A high job satisfaction has been

associated with positive behaviors such as high job performance, whereas a low level of

job satisfaction has been linked to distressful behaviors such as absenteeism, high rate of

turnover, and lower reliability (Millet, 2007). Hart and Wearing (1995) asserted that job

satisfaction among police officers is between 3% and 13% of the variation in the level of

life satisfaction.

Understanding how emotional intelligence may relate to job satisfaction in a

changing environment can be relevant to organizations attempting to restore confidence

and regain employees’ commitment. To be successful in today’s environment of various

fluctuations, Barone et al. (2000) recommended, “one must possess not only theoretical

knowledge and technological competence but also emotional intelligence” (para. 3).
46

Employees must be skilled in interpersonal and intrapersonal abilities to recognize their

own feelings, as well as the emotions in others with whom they interact, to use this

information to enhance their level of job satisfaction. The review of literature outlines

various empirical research studies that support the validity of the ability model of

emotional intelligence (Caruso et al., 2000a). The survey instrument of choice that was

used throughout this study to assess emotional intelligence was ECI, which encompasses

the spectrum of the mixed model of emotional intelligence.

Germinal Framework of Organizational Change Theories

The review of the literature on organizational psychology revealed that a plurality

of organizational change theories that resulted from the transformations of the workplace

existed. As Caldwell (2005) pointed out, the review of the literature revealed a heuristic

classification of organizational change into four discourses: rationalism, contextualism,

disperalism, and constructionism. Lewin’s force field analysis theory created the

framework for a profound rationalist approach. The proponent of rationalist discourses

gave priority to a centered agency and argued that change must be planned through

strategic action.

The contextualist discourses focused on the emergent aspect of change and the

enclosed character of centered agency in organizations (Caldwell, 2005). The most

influential proponent of the contextualist approach is Pettigrew (2000). Pettigrew

developed the incrementalist approach--with a transition-approach to contain the

continuity and the discontinuity in the organizational change (Caldwell, 2005). The

dispersalist discourses focused predominantly on decentralizing the change process in the

organization. Caldwell (2005) argued, “The reduction of central hierarchical control in


47

organizations has resulted in a growing emphasis on project and cross-functional teams as

mechanisms to achieve greater horizontal coordination across organizational divisions,

units and work processes” (p. 97).

Constructionist discourses is defined as anti-rationalism, anti-scientism, anti-

essentialism, and anti-realism approach (Caldwell, 2005). Overall, Caldwell emphasized,

“These four discourses can be defined as forms of language, meaning--representing and

shaping relatively coherent social, cultural or disciplinary fields of knowledge and

practice that embody contextual rules” (p. 86). The literature review on organizational

change theories outlined the following theories.

Bolman and Deal’s (1997) Four Organizational Frames

Bolman and Deal’s theory described four orientations to implement the effort of

change within the organization. The structural orientation is used to “develop structures

that efficiently reach a desired outcome” (Bonner, Koch, & Langmeyer, 2004, p. 460).

The political orientation is concerned about how people involved in the change used

authority to protect themselves and to involve others. As cited in Bonner et al. (2004),

Blasé (1991) argued that the political orientation is concerned about “how individuals and

groups compete and cooperate, to achieve their goals” (p. 18). In contrast to structural

and political orientations, the human resources orientation is concerned about the

interrelationship between the change effort and people involved.

The aim of human relations orientation is to make the work meaningful and

satisfying for employees so that organization can get the talent and energy needed to

succeed. According to Bolman and Deal (1997), the symbolic orientation is concerned

about the belief and the culture of the organization. Bonner et al. (2004) argued, “Culture,
48

tradition and customs provide bases from which individuals and organizations can

grapple with the ambiguity and complexity that a new initiative introduces” (p. 462).

Chin and Benne’s (1994) General Strategies for Change

This conceptualization of organizational change employed three general strategies

to implement change. The empirical-rational strategy is concerned to provide research

and training to promote knowledge-based technologies and approaches. Bonner et al.

(2004) argued, “The empirical-rational approach to change assumes that people are

guided by reason and data, and that decisions be guided by rational analysis” (p. 463).

The normative-reductive strategy argued that people are active participant in their own

reeducation and that people change when they are given the occasion to revalue their

belief and shared values (Bonner et al., 2004). The power-coercive strategy asserted that

people are flexible during the adjustment of power norms. The power can be used in term

of compliance to policy and sanctions (Bonner et al., 2004).

Change as Series of Transitions.

As argued in Bonner et al. (2004), Nadler (1981) asserted that change brings in

the organization many challenges of resistance, control and power and proposed 12 steps

to cope with these challenges during the transition. To motivate change, change leader

must identify the dissatisfaction with the current stage, build participation in the change

process, reward the new behavior, and provide people the time to adapt to the new

behavior (Bonner et al., 2004).

Depth of Emotional Investment in Change

This approach recommended to organization leaders to be flexible and use the

directing style of leadership as well as show their ability to follow orders. The proponent
49

of this approach, Harrison (1970) argued, “when individuals in an organization are

relatively autonomous and what you are trying to change is their individual and complex

behaviors, interventions must be made at a relatively deep level” (Bonner et al., 2004, p.

466).

Conflict and Goals

The proponent of conflict and goals approach, Perrow (1972) asserted that

organizations structure and mission provide constraints and opportunities (Bonner et al.,

2004). In this approach, conflict between is inevitable and organizational goals must be

negotiated in a way that enhances the change process (Bonner et al., 2004).

Independent Variables

The independent variables of this study are the competencies of emotional

intelligence as defined in the ECI test (Hay Group, 2006, Hay Group, 2007). According

to Hay Group (2006), the clusters of emotional intelligence include “self-awareness,

social-awareness, self-management, and relationship-management” (p. 3). The study

explored how the competencies conceptualized under the umbrella of these clusters of

emotional intelligence are correlated to General Job Satisfaction. Goleman (1998)

inferred that emotional intelligence is categorized into two main components; namely,

personal competency determines self-awareness or how to manage oneself and social

competency assists to manage relationships. The review of the literature on

organizational performance indicated that emotional intelligence underlies various

aspects of workplace performance that personality or intelligence quotient could not

claim (Goleman, 1998).


50

The literature and related research demonstrate a variance in the definition and

explanation of the concept of emotional intelligence by authors and theorists. To

emphasize that these variations converge toward the same fundamentals, which recognize

and understand emotions and their effectiveness to enhance life’s satisfaction, motivate

others, and improve workplace relationships becomes imperative. Little and O’Connor

(2003) viewed emotional intelligence as an effective predictor of success in a leadership

role and life achievement, more than cognitive intelligence. Research studies explored the

link between emotional intelligence and diverse aspects of life satisfaction (Busso, 2003).

Martinez-Pons (1997) stated that emotional intelligence is positively correlated

with life satisfaction, and Schutte et al. (2001) concluded that highly emotional intelligent

individuals experience higher satisfaction in their marriages. Goleman (1995) asserted

that emotionally intelligent people are more successful in maintaining healthy

relationships. The review of the literature revealed many arguments on emotional

intelligence competency as contributor of life satisfaction and how leaders may use

emotional competency to stay competitive but a little is known on the relationships

between emotional intelligence competencies and General Job Satisfaction within the

context of organizational change. If emotional intelligence competencies are positively

correlated to General Job Satisfaction, the results of the current study could help

developing emotional intelligence-based organizational strategy in restoring motivation,

gaining commitment, and enhancing job satisfaction of employees in an unstable work

environment. Table 1 illustrates the framework of emotional competencies as defined by

Goleman (2001) in the ECI.


51

Self-Awareness

This ability of self-awareness is the emotional awareness that leaders use to

recognize self-feeling and its effects. Accurately assessing these feelings allows leaders

to appraise ones’ own strengths and limitations relating to the decision-making process.

Literature reveals that emotional intelligence proposes multiple scales to measure self-

awareness and expression.

Salovey and Mayer (1990) described a historical perspective of the evolution of

these score instruments. According to Salovey and Mayer, Beth Israel Hospital's

psychosomatic questionnaire was the instrument selected by researchers to assess self-

awareness for many years. Because of the subjectivity and low reliability nature of Israel

Hospital's psychosomatic scale, other instruments were introduced. Schalling-Sifneos'

personality scale and the Toronto Alexithymia scale were constructed to measure self-

awareness in psychosomatic patients. Bar-On (1998) developed a process to assess

emotional intelligence to measure well-being through emotional quotient. To differentiate

emotional intelligence from social attributes or abilities, Salovey and Mayer (1990)

stated, “those who are more accurate in self-awareness can quickly perceive and respond

to their own emotions and better express those emotions to others” (para. 24).
52

Table 1

Framework of Emotional Intelligence Competencies

Personal Competence Social Competence

Self-Awareness Social-Awareness

• Self-Awareness • Empathy

Recognition • Self-Assessment • Service Orientation

• Self-Confidence • Organizational Awareness

Self-Management Relationship Management

• Self-Control • Developing others

• Trustworthiness • Influence

Regulation • Conscientiousness • Communication

• Adaptability • Conflict Management

• Achievement drive • Visionary leadership

• Initiative • Change Catalyzing

• Building Bonds

• Collaboration

Social Awareness

This competency of social-awareness relates to empathy, which allows people to

accurately assess others’ feelings and to pay attention to their concerns. Salovey and

Mayer (1990) pointed out the importance that “people be able to perceive emotions not

only in themselves but also in those around them” (para. 25). Self-awareness is related to
53

the intrapersonal skill of individuals, and contains competencies such as empathy and

organizational awareness. Goleman (1998) inferred that social-awareness includes

competency such as empathy to sense others’ feelings and perspectives. Service

orientation skills help leaders to anticipate, recognize and meet customers’ expectations,

which assist leaders to sense what others need to develop and reveal their creativity.

Leveraging diversity skills allow organizations to cultivate opportunities through

diverse people in order to overcome today’s volatile work environment. Political

awareness allows leaders to read a group’s emotion and power relationships within

crucial social networks. Salovey and Mayer (1990) outlined various scales such as the

affect sensitivity test, the communication of affect receiving ability test, and the profile of

nonverbal sensitivity, to measure emotional intelligence competencies. Among these

competencies categorized under the social-awareness, Fitness and Curtis (2005)

emphasized that “empathic ability is thus viewed as important in the realm of

interpersonal functioning” (p. 51). Salovey and Mayer considered emphatic ability as

skill enabling “individuals to gauge accurately the affective responses in others and to

choose socially adaptive behaviors in response” (p. 195).

Self-Management

Salovey and Mayer (1990) defined the competency of self-management as the

“processes that under-gird differences in the ability to regulate one’s own emotions” (p.

196). As stated by Goleman (1998), self-management entails attributes such as: (a) self-

regulation or self-control, (b) assist people to manage impulsive feelings and distressing

emotions, (c) trustworthiness that monitors standards of honesty and integrity in leaders,

(d) conscientiousness that leads to take responsibility and ownership for personal
54

performance, (e) adaptability helps people to adapt themselves and their strategies to fit

fluid circumstances, and (f) the innovativeness that allows individuals to be opened to

novel ideas and new information. Self-management cluster contains competencies such

as achievement orientation, adaptability, emotional self-control, and positive outlook

Salovey and Mayer (1990) developed two scales to measure mood regulation: the

state meta-mood scale to score “the momentary regulation” (p. 196) and the trait meta-

mood scale to measure “the longer-term regulatory style” (p.196). The trait scale helps to

access individual differences in the way individuals respond to their feelings and mood

states. As cited by Fitness and Curtis (2005), Mayer and Salovey (1995) maintained that

emotional intelligence “should be positively associated with mental control and adaptive

emotion management” (p. 51). The present study used the ECI and the MSQ in a

correlational research study to look for the logical relationships between emotional

intelligence and job satisfaction.

Relationship Management

This competency of relationship-management involves social skills that Salovey

and Mayer (1990) have identified as processes susceptible “to regulate, even manipulate,

the affective reactions of other people” (p. 196). Goleman (1998) inferred that

relationship-management includes attributes such as (a) the ability to influence others, (b)

insight to provide individuals with effective tools of persuasion and building consensus,

(c) the communication skill that enhances individual's ability to send a clear and

convincing vision, (d) the leadership skill needed to inspire and raise the capability of

others.
55

Other attributes include the (e) change catalyst skill to initiate and manage stress

brought by today’s changing work environment, (f) the conflict management skill that

helps in resolving disagreements and repairing negative emotional experience, (g) the

building bonds skill that helps leaders to cultivate extensive informal networks, and (h)

the sensitivity to seek out interactions that benefit all. Salovey and Mayer (1990) argued

that individuals skilled in this competency can “enhance their own and others’ moods and

even manage emotions so as to motivate others charismatically toward a worthwhile end”

(p. 198). Relationship Management contains abilities such as “conflict management,

coach and mentor, influence, inspirational leadership and teamwork” (Hay Group, 2007,

p. 6).

Dependent Variable

The dependent variable of the study is General Job Satisfaction as defined in the

MSQ (Dawis, England et al., 1967). The study focused on the nature and the extent of

relationships emotional intelligence and the level of General Job Satisfaction of

employees of a retail organization under restructure. Job satisfaction refers to employees’

level of satisfaction with their job or with particular aspects of that job. Literature reveals

a progression in definition of job satisfaction. Maslow (1954) viewed job satisfaction as

related to meeting human needs and Porter (1962) described it as a summation of

fulfilling an individual’s job expectations. Busso (2003) asserted that the recent and

comprehensive definition of the concept comes from Dawis and Lofquist (1984), who

defined job satisfaction as a “pleasurable affective condition resulting from one’s

appraisal of the way in which the experienced job situation meets one’s needs, values and

expectations” (p. 72).


56

Current Findings

In a continuously changing environment, leaders should devote particular

attention to the needs of an individual worker, to create a climate that encourages internal

communication and trust, openness, and interconnectivity among employees in the

workplace. Abraham (2000) concluded from a study of 79 healthcare, insurance, and

telecommunication professionals that emotional intelligence accounts for a significant

amount of job outcome variance. The economic situation of the 21st century has

displaced employees’ loyalty and commitment, which organizations established in the

prior century. Employees concerned about their job security usually leads to job

dissatisfaction and their work performance suffers (Mone, 1997). This study explored the

extent of the relationships between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction of

employees in today’s unstable working environment.

Current Findings on Emotional Intelligence

Recent studies of managerial derailment indicate that intelligence quotient of

leaders has become obsolete to guarantee successful management practice that can

overcome to the negative effects of the changes. Barone et al. (2000) affirmed that

derailment is associated with a lack of abilities such as self-awareness, relationship

management, social awareness, and inadaptability to change. Emotional intelligence has

become an important issue relating to organizational success in the 21st century

(Goleman, 1998). Middle and upper level managers are realizing that in order to stay

competitive in today’s workplace, one must demonstrate a high emotional quotient level

or high emotional intelligence in their work. Shield (2008) argued that emotional

intelligence explained 34% of the variance in transformational leadership behavior.


57

Lusch and Serpkenci (1990) concluded from analyzing store managers in a retail

organization that the ability to successfully manage stress improved the forecast of net

profits and employee productivity. Goleman (2000) stated, “People good at managing

relationship tend also to be self-aware, self-regulating, and empathetic” (p. 33).

Emotional intelligence is recognized as leading non-cognitive abilities that affect one to

successfully deal with pressure and a changing environment (Millet, 2007). The

development of information technology has amplified the effects of cultural diversity and

globalization. Theoretical knowledge coupled with technological competences has

become insufficient to guarantee management’s success in gaining commitment in the

workplace. Research has shown relationships between emotional intelligence and various

organizational outcomes such as job performance, employees’ motivation, organizational

commitment, and organizational citizenship (Sy et al., 2006; Van Rooy & Viswesvaran,

2004).

Luthans (2002) asserted that possessing awareness of emotional intelligence and

managing the awareness effectively could increase organizational performance (Lowe &

Barnes, 2002; Macaleer & Jones, 2002). Various studies have been performed correlating

relationships between emotional intelligence and predictors of performance (Dulewicz &

Higgs, 2000). Research studies concluded that emotional intelligence was a primary

factor in performance in organizations (Deeter-Schmelz & Sojka, 2003). In a study of 11

high performer sales professionals, Deeter-Schmelz and Sojka found that participants

exhibited characteristics associated with emotional intelligence. The empathy ability

allowed these sales professionals to anticipate customers’ emotion through their body

language.
58

In a study of 154 fifth and sixth graders from a low socio-economic school district

using Talking with TJ program, Rosenblatt and Elias (2008) discovered that the GPA

score of students who received higher dosages of intervention remains higher than the

GPA score of students in lower dosage classrooms over their fifth grade years. A number

of other research studies indicated that in the absence of specific academic programs,

social-emotional learning programs can lead to higher academic performance

(Bloodworth, Weissberg, Walberg, & Zins, 2004). In a study of 304 students at a

university in the western United States, a paper-and-pencil survey was administered by

Lam and Kirby (2002). Based upon their results Lam and Kirby concluded that,

emotional intelligence, perception of emotional intelligence, and regulation of emotions

have strong correlations with cognitive-based performance.

Douglas, Frink, and Ferris (2004) found strong correlations between high-levels

of conscientiousness, high-levels of emotional intelligence, and high-performance scores

among 205 students enrolled in two principle management classes at a university in the

southern United States. Other studies conducted on anesthesiology residents at the

University of Pittsburgh, using the Bar-On EQ-I 125 survey, concluded on significantly

negative correlation (r = -.40, p < .05) between emotional intelligence and the resident

performance (Talarico, Metro, Patel, Carney, & Wetmore, 2008). In a research study to

investigate the relationships between elementary school principals of high-performing

and low-performing school using the Gerald V. Miller Leader EQ-S Test Instrument,

Spainhower (2008) found no significant variations between the principals of the both

schools in term of interpersonal, intrapersonal, stress management, and affect categories

when using the Mann-Whitney U Parametric Test.


59

Further analysis using the Mann-Whitney U Non-Parametric Test resulted in a

significant difference between two components: In the intrapersonal category,

participants shared a significant difference when prompted to consider their friendships.

In the affect category, participants shared a significant difference when prompted to

consider if they could keep a positive outlook in the presence of adversity. Spainhower

(2008) recommended that understanding emotional intelligence competencies, their

effects on organizational environment, and their relationship with leadership may school

to develop a comprehensive leadership professional plan for prospective principals.

Using two samples of undergraduate students who were either currently employed

or had been employed in the past to provide how to assess emotional intelligence most

effectively, Hanna (2008) concluded that further research studies should focus on finding

a unified definition of emotional intelligence and pinpoint the best uses of the concept of

emotional intelligence in the workplace. Robitaille (2008) concluded from a research

study intended to explore the relationship between emotional intelligence, teacher

effectiveness, and teacher certification that there is no significant differences between

special education teachers certified in emotional and behavior disorders and the general

population of teachers in their perceptions of effectiveness and their intrapersonal,

interpersonal and stress management skills.

To explore the relationship between the dimensions of emotional intelligence and

academic achievement in African American female college, Bradshaw (2008) conducted

a research study of 60 successful undergraduate female African American college

students at local colleges and universities in a mid-Atlantic area. The quantitative

findings revealed a weak correlation between stress management and the academic
60

performance of African American college student. In contrast, the qualitative findings

provided explanatory power beyond the quantitative findings in four additional themes: A

sense of identity of the student as a woman, association with African American heritage,

family structure or responsibility within the family structure, and community

connectedness and obligations.

Bradshaw (2008) recommended further search for instruments more sensitive to

the connection between emotional intelligence factors and academic achievement. The

current quantitative correlational analysis explored the extent of the relationships between

emotional intelligence and the level of job satisfaction among distribution center

employees, within the context of organizational change.

Current Findings on Job Satisfaction

Zeffane (1994) concluded from a study of Australian public telecommunication

sector that task variety, employee’s participation in decision process about future

direction, and work-group performance are positively correlated with job satisfaction. In

a research study of 520 public safety agencies in the state of Florida intended to explore

possible relationship between job satisfaction and satisfaction with cost of employee

benefit, Johnson (2009) concluded on a positive correlation between benefit cost

satisfaction and overall job satisfaction. The findings did not conclude any significant

difference in benefit cost satisfaction between the participants of different age range. The

findings did not conclude on significant difference between the participants with

dependent household members and without dependent household members (Johnson,

2009).
61

Wietzel (2009) conducted a quantitative study to determine the effective

approach federal executives should follow to motivate their employees toward achieving

high performance and meet organizational goals. Wietzel concluded that federal

employees perceive job satisfaction, education level, and management styles as related to

high performance and the organizational culture. Wietzel also found that pay,

development programs, and feedback from supervisors are key indicators that influence

productivity. The results also concluded that rewards are not effective tools to increase

job satisfaction. Wietzel recommended to management to take active interest in their

employees’ career development.

Ngwenya-Scoburgh (2009) concluded from a research investigation intended to

reinforce the value of organizational learning relative to organizational performance

within various industries that learning capabilities do not contribute significantly to

increase organizational performance. Instead, the non-financial factors, such as job

satisfaction and the formalization of the organizational structure, seemed to have the most

influence on organizational performance (Ngwenya-Scoburgh, 2009). Ngwenya-

Scoburgh emphasized the need for organizations to allocate more resources to the non-

financial factors as opposed to the financial factors, in order to increase productivity and

develop a viable learning environment.

Crump (2008) asserted that people who experienced overall job satisfaction in the

organization have two expectations, which are opportunity for promotion and pay. Crump

concluded that a correlation between job satisfaction and years of service existed. Stewart

(2008) conducted a research study on 110 managers and supervisors of a food service

industry using Bar-On EQ-I test. The findings indicated no significant relationship
62

between organizational commitment, emotional intelligence and job satisfaction.

Evidence that older managers who are more adaptable displayed higher levels of both

organizational commitment and job satisfaction exists (Stewart, 2008). An exploratory

investigation between school principal's emotional intelligence and teacher job

satisfaction at three public schools concluded a positive relationship between the

dimensions of emotional intelligence displayed by school principal and the job

satisfaction of the teachers (Craig, 2008).

Conclusion

Although emotional intelligence is a relatively new concept, it has gained

considerable attention subsequent to Goleman's (1995) research on emotional

intelligence. Research studies found emotional intelligence to be a predictor of various

occupational outcomes such as job performance, employees’ motivation, organizational

commitment, organizational citizenship (Sy et al., 2006; Van Rooy & Viswesvaran,

2004) and successful life and work balance (Humber, 2002). Lugo (2007) argued that

emotional intelligence is a critical predictor for intercultural adjustment and associated

successes. Dong (2006) argued that although growing research studies have discussed job

satisfaction, there is a gap in the understanding of how job satisfaction is related to

emotional intelligence.

The aim of the current study was to add to existing knowledge by examining the

relationships between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction in the retail business

environment in the context of organizational change. Understanding the relationships

between emotional intelligence as measured by ECI and General Job Satisfaction as

scored by MSQ among retail distribution center employees within the context of
63

organizational change is worthy of research. Creswell (2005) contended that study is

worthy of research when the study replicates or expands previous research by looking at

different population and variables in order to make original contribution to the body of

knowledge.

Summary

Chapter 2 reviewed the literature on emotional intelligence, job satisfaction and

organizational change. In the chapter, different theories that undermined the concept of

job satisfaction, the construct of emotional intelligence and organization psychology were

explored. Taylor scientific management theory, the human relations theory of Mayo,

Maslow’s hierarchy of need, the motivation-hygiene theory of Herzberg et al. (1959), the

situational occurrence theory, the positive psychology theory and other organizational

psychology theories were discussed. The historical studies and current findings related to

the variables of the study were also presented. Chapter 3 involves the research

methodology and the research design appropriateness. The population, the informed

consent forms, the sample, the confidentiality of the study, the instrumentation, the data

collection, and the data analysis are also reviewed and discussed in the next chapter.
64

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHOD

The purpose of the present correlational research study was to analyze the

relationships between emotional intelligence as scored by ECI and job satisfaction as

scored by MSQ, within the context of organizational change. Chapter 3 includes the

methodology used to collect and assess the data, the research design, and the variables of

the study, the research question, and hypotheses. The selection of participants and survey

instruments to collect the data, the assurance of participant confidentiality and ethical

treatment, the appropriateness of the research design are discussed in this chapter. The

feasibility of the research study as well as the reliability and validity of the method are

also reviewed in the chapter.

Research Method Appropriateness

The quantitative method was suitable to conduct the present study. The current

research design is the correlational research approach. In contrast to a qualitative research

design that is concerned with understanding, interpreting, and conceptualizing the central

phenomenon, Creswell (2003) argued that quantitative research methods are the most

appropriate methods for describing trends and explaining the extent of relationships

between variables.

Although correlation cannot logically determine causation, “high correlation

values should suggest causal relationships. Such suggested relationships have to be

verified by other experimental means” (Barr et al., 2002, p. 48). Descriptive statistics

were used to summarize the features of the sample and to measure central tendency and

variations. The quantitative correlational design was considered as the appropriate

method to investigate the nature and understand the extent of relationships between
65

variables in this study. The study was designed to determine the correlation coefficients

of the variables and evaluated how these coefficients are aligned.

Leedy and Ormrod (2005) asserted that when investigating relationships, the

focus must be on the extent of the relationships between the variables. Relationships exist

when one variable changes and the other variable varies in an expected manner relative to

that first variable. The quantitative correlational design was adopted in the present study

as an efficient and appropriate method of analyzing the relationship between variables

within the context of organizational change.

The population selected for the present study included 200 employees of a

furniture and bedding retail distribution center located in a northeastern state in the

United States. Every effort was made in selecting the participants in the way so that the

participants were representative of the target population. To this end, a number was

assigned to each of the 200 employees of the distribution center, and a random number

table was used in the sampling process. Creswell (2003) argued that random sampling is

the most rigorous sampling form. The sample size selected (n = 80) to conduct the current

research study was representative of the target population in the four locations of the

organization (N = 200). The ratio of the sample to the population of 40% with the

confidence level of 95% and the margin of error of 8.5% was sufficient, according to

American Research Group, Inc. (2002) statistical formula.

Informed Consent

Prior to administering the survey questionnaires, the employees of the furniture

and bedding distribution center selected to participate into the study received a packet

that included the letter of introduction to the study (see Appendix A) and the informed
66

consent agreement form (see Appendix B). The participants were notified that their

participation was voluntary and that their individual identity information would be kept

confidential during and following the study. The survey was confidential and did not

require any personal identifier that may link the data to the participants. Instead of

personal identities, numbers were used on the data to eliminate the risk of personal

information being made public. The participants were notified that the results of the study

might be published, but only in aggregate form so that no personal information would be

revealed.

The confidentiality of the survey and anonymity of the participants were

explained in the letter of introduction to the study (see Appendix A). The responses to the

survey were not linked to the identity of the participants. The participants were required

to sign and return a set of the informed consent forms before receiving the surveys and

questionnaires. The participants and the researcher each received a copy of the signed

consent forms.

Sampling

The sampling process was randomized to ensure that the sample would be

representative of the entire population. A number was assigned to each of the 200

employees of the retail distribution center, and a random number table was used to select

the participants. The sample size of participants selected to conduct in this research study

was considered to be representative of the population. The participants in the study were

male and female full-time employees. According to American Research Group’s (2002)

statistical formula, the sample size of 80 participants from the population of 200 was
67

sufficient, based on 95% confidence level and a margin of error of 8.5%. The sample size

comprised 20 participants from each location, totaling 80 employees (n = 80).

Confidentiality

The survey was confidential and did not require participants’ personal identifiers

that may link the data collected to the participants. The confidentiality of the survey and

anonymity of the participants were explained in the letter of introduction to the study.

Prior to the study, a packet that included the letter of introduction, the informed consent

agreement form, and the informed consent participation form were sent to the

participants. The participants were informed that their individual identity information

would be kept confidential during and after the study. The signed consent forms and the

data collected will be kept in a locked filing cabinet in the office of the researcher for

three years, and only the researcher has access to this information. At the final stage of

the archival period, all the records, associated materials, and signed consent forms will be

destroyed.

Geographic Location

The furniture and bedding retail distribution center located in northeastern state in

the United States was selected as the site at which to conduct the current correlational

study. The subject of the study was organizational change. The investigator selected this

organization because of his association with the organization and his knowledge of the

retail industry.

Instrumentation

Several tools were available for assessing emotional intelligence and job

satisfaction. The selection of the most appropriate instruments for the current study was
68

driven by the review of the literature and analysis of available tools. Many tools for

assessing emotional intelligence and job satisfaction were evaluated on the basis of their

alignment with the purpose of the study.

Some instruments, such as Multifactor Emotional Intelligence Scale TM

(MEITM), are used to measure human performance abilities that relate to environmental

abilities; and others, such as Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test

(MSCEIT), are used to evaluate the four dimensions of emotional intelligence model of

Mayer and Salovey (EI Consortium, 2010b). The Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQi)

was also a consideration for study, but the literature review revealed that this survey was

intended to provide the scores of the emotional quotient scales of emotional-social

intelligence model of Bar-On (EI Consortium, 2010a). These survey instruments did not

fit the purpose the present study. The Emotional Quotient Map (EQ Map) is used to

evaluate individual’s present situation, emotional literacy, EQ abilities and values, and

EQ results (Carr, 2004).

While these data collection instruments may be effective tools for measuring

emotional intelligence, they are not designed to provide the type of measurement of

emotional intelligence that was needed for the present research study. An examination of

literature on job satisfaction revealed various tools are available to measure job

satisfaction. Job Descriptive Index (JDI), which is extensively used to assess job

satisfaction (Howard, 2009), is designed to measure the following five components of the

employee satisfaction: Work satisfaction, pay satisfaction, satisfaction with opportunity

of development, satisfaction with manager, and inter-employee satisfaction.


69

As cited in Howard (2009), Spector (1985) argued that studying job satisfaction in

human enterprises was strongly related to job performance and outcomes. The lack in the

Job Descriptive Index of these affective reactions created a void for the accurate

measurement of job satisfaction. In response to the problem, Spector developed the Job

Satisfaction Survey (JSS), which is 36-item survey split into the following nine facets of

job satisfaction: pay, promotion opportunities, supervision, worker benefits, contingent

rewards, rules and practices, coworkers, type of work, and communication. While these

various instruments were necessary for assessing job satisfaction, they did not provide the

intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction measures that were needed for this research study.

The confirmatory factor analysis was used to establish the appropriateness of the

survey instrumentation of the ECI and MSQ for the purpose of the current study. The

present study examined the relationships between the independent variables--emotional

intelligence competencies of how employees manage themselves and others--and the

dependent variable--job satisfaction, which Dawis and Lofquist (1984) defined as “ The

pleasurable affective condition resulting from one’s appraisal of the way in which a job

situation meets one’s needs, values, and expectations” (p. 20). The data were collected

using a self-reporting assessment, the ECI test (Hay Group, 2006; Hay Group, 2007), to

assess emotional intelligence and a self-reporting assessment, such as the MSQ (Dawis,

England et al., 1967).

Goleman (1998) developed the ECI tool to assess emotional intelligence. The ECI

is a 360-degree multi-rater survey that uses a range of emotional and social abilities to

rate oneself and others. It measures 12 emotional abilities organized into “four clusters:

self-awareness, social awareness, self-management, and relationship management” (Hay


70

Group, 2006, p. 3). The participants were inquired to describe themselves or the other

person on a scale of one (slightly characteristic) to seven (very characteristic) for each

item. Each item of the questionnaire corresponds to a specific competence (Brown &

Stys, 2004; Hay Group, 2006). The participant has two ratings for each of the abilities: a

self-rating and a rating from other rater (Boyatzis, Goleman, & Rhee, 2000; Hay Group,

2006, Hay Group, 2007).

Dawis, England et al. (1967) developed the MSQ to assess job satisfaction. The

questionnaire assesses specific information of the job that employees find rewarding.

This study used the questionnaire form of 100 items that appear in blocks of 20. Each

item is a reinforcer of satisfaction in the work environment. The participant indicated

how satisfied he or she was with the reinforcer on the job. An analysis of the 20 items

yielded in two factors; namely, intrinsic and the extrinsic satisfaction.

The correlation coefficient was determined and compared. Bernstein and

Nunnally (1994) asserted that one could assess content validity of a study by revealing

internal consistency by comparing the scores of similar instruments to show the existence

of relationships. As stated by Bernstein and Nunnally (1994), the measure validity is

confirmed when a significant relationship was found between the tests. As argued in

Brown (2005), George and Mallery (2003) contended that all research studies exploring

correlations between variables must use a method to demonstrate if relationships exist.

The software package Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (2003) was

used in the data analysis to calculate and display results by which to demonstrate valid

relationships.
71

Data Collection Procedures

A quantitative correlational design was used to evaluate the data collected from a

sample of 80 full-time employees randomly selected from a total population of 200 full-

time employees of a furniture and bedding retail distribution center located in a

northeastern state in the United States. A number was assigned to each of the 200 full-

time employees of furniture and bedding distribution center, and a random number table

was used to select the sample to increase the likelihood that the sample was

representative of the target population. First, a starting point was randomly picked in the

table by pointing the finger on a cell with eyes closed. Second, a direction in which to

read the numbers was identified as follow up to down. Third, the numbers selected from

the table were the ones whose last two digits fell between 0 and 80. The selection

processes continued until 80 employees were selected.

If the end of the table was reached before obtaining the sample size, another

starting point was picked from the table and read in a different direction. The procedure

was repeated until the selection of 80 participants was completed. When a participant

declined, the procedure was repeated to select another participant. Five participants

declined, and the procedure was used to reselect other participants from the population.

After the selection of the participants, group meetings were held at the four locations with

the participants to explain the purpose and nature of the study, the data collection

procedure, and assure that participation was absolutely voluntary. A total of 80 full-time

employees, selected from the four locations of a furniture and bedding distribution center

located in northeastern state in the United States agreed to participate in the study. This
72

sample size was sufficient to ensure a 95% confidence level and 8.5% theoretical margin

of error (American Research Group, 2000).

The group meetings were held to provide detail explanations on the purpose of the

research study and to clarify the instructions on how to complete the surveys. The

participants had time to ask questions. During the group meetings, a package that

contained the study introductory letter, both MSQ and ECI surveys, a demographic

datasheet, and the consent forms were distributed to the participants. There were two

booklets for the ECI survey: the self-assessment booklet and the rater booklet.

Having signed and submitted the consent forms, the participants answered to the

survey questionnaires. The participants were asked to complete the survey instruments

and to return them to the researcher. Figure 1 presents the research design model that

summarizes the steps that were taken in the present study to evaluate the relationships

between emotional intelligence and the job satisfaction of employees.

The data collection process included the following six steps:

1. The participants met the qualifications described in the informed consent

forms, they are made aware of their rights, their participation to the study was voluntary,

and no obligation to participate. The research model was explained to the participants,

their participation in the study remained confidential, and their responses to the

questionnaires remained anonymous. Prior to administering the surveys, permissions

were granted from the Hay Group for use of the ECI test (see Appendix C) and from the

Vocational Psychology Research Department of the University of Minnesota for use of

MSQ (see Appendix D).


73

2. Upon submitting signed consent forms, participants received the packet that

included the survey instruments and the instructions on how to complete them.

Participants were asked to read the instructions and to complete the questionnaires.

3. Participants were required to return the survey instruments to the researcher

after they had completed the survey questionnaires.


74

Location B Location C

Location A Location D

Sampling process: A random number table

Data
Job Analysis & Emotional
satisfaction comparison intelligence
test: MSQ of tests: ECI
coefficients

Results of analysis: Discussion

Figure 1. Research design model

4. Because the ECI is a 360-degree multi-rater tool, the present study involved

emotional intelligence data from the self and other raters: Two peers, two managers and a

direct report.

5. The average of self and other raters’ scores was used to determine the scores of

the independent variables of emotional intelligence.

6. General Job Satisfaction scores were calculated and used as the dependent

variable of the study.


75

Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficient were used to explore the

existence of relationships between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction. The chi-

square test helped to test the interdependence between the variables. A Pearson product

movement correlation coefficient was used to establish the extent of the relationships.

The data provided by the survey assessments were examined with the statistical

package for the social sciences software with a confidence level of 95%. Descriptive

statistics were used to describe the data collected. The data were entered into the software

of statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS), which is commonly considered an

effective and efficient method of displaying and analyzing data.

The MSQ rated the employees’ levels of satisfaction with their particular job. The

questionnaire measures job satisfaction on 20 five-item scales using a 5-point Likert-type

scale ranging from Not Satisfied, Only Slightly Satisfied, Satisfied, Very Satisfied, to

Extremely Satisfied. These dimensions yielded a general satisfaction score, which is the

dependent variable of the current study. The ECI measures 12 emotional competencies

organized into four clusters using a 5-point Likert-type scale from Never, Rarely,

Sometimes, Often, to Consistently, plus a not applicable option.

The ECI provided data on the four clusters. Each cluster contains emotional

intelligence competencies as defined in Hay Group (2007). The Self-awareness cluster

contains the emotional self-awareness competency; the Self-management cluster contains

competencies such as achievement orientation, adaptability, emotional self-control, and a

positive outlook. The Social-awareness cluster contains competencies such as empathy

and organizational awareness; and the Relationship management cluster contains conflict
76

management, coach and mentor influence, inspirational leadership, and teamwork. The

average scores of self-assessment and rater assessments were calculated for each

competency and used as the independent variables of emotional intelligence. Correlation

analysis was used to determine how all the independent variables of emotional

intelligence were correlated with the dependent variable of job satisfaction. The

independent variables were used in the correlational analysis to determine which

competencies were most likely correlated to job satisfaction.

The null hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between emotional

intelligence competencies as defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined

by the MSQ was to be rejected if the study found the relationships existed. An alpha level

of .05 was pre-established as the criterion for determining significant relationships

between the variables. Emotional intelligence, as argued by Humber (2002), is a valid

predictor of “individual success at home and at work” (p. 16). The present study would

become a more valuable asset to organizations if it were to conclude relationships

between the competencies comprising emotional intelligence and job satisfaction.

Validity and Reliability

Leedy and Ormrod (2005) asserted that the assurance of validity and reliability of

research is the most important step that researchers must undertake. The validity of a

study determines if significant patterns can be identified from the data collected. To

establish validity and reliability of a study, the researcher must ensure that the survey

instruments are relevant to the methodology and to the variables of the study (Brown,

2005). In the current study, confirmatory factor analysis technique was used to determine

the goodness of the fit of the survey instruments. Reliability was defined as the extent to
77

which a research study concludes on the same result when the study is reproduced;

validity is concerned with the accuracy of the actual method of assessing or measuring

what the researcher sets out to measure.

Internal

To overcome the internal validity issues, the present research study was designed

to stress the rigor with which the study was conducted. A random table was used to

randomly pick five participants from among the sample selected to complete the other

rater questionnaires. The average of both the self-score and other rater scores was used in

the calculation of the competency scores. The Pearson correlation coefficient determined

the reliability to demonstrate the stability of scores (Creswell, 2003). Because the goal of

the current study was to determine the nature and the extent of relationships between the

variables, the data analysis process included any alternative that would explain the

difference between the results.

External

To eliminate any speculation on the research design that could influence the

generalization of the results, the current study was designed to make use of the random

number table in the selection of the participants. The sample was representative of the

target population, and the external validity of the study was effective. Leedy and Ormrod

(2005) reported that external validity could be measured by the extent to which similar

studies can draw the same conclusions.

The MSQ is a highly valid and reliable survey instrument, which is easy to use

and easy to understand by members of an organization. Dawis, England et al. (1967)

argued, “The reliability coefficients for the MSQ scales ranged from a high of .97 on
78

ability utilization and on working conditions to a low of .59 on variety” (p. 14). The test

and retest correlations for a one-year interval had stability coefficients that ranged from

.35 for independence to .71 for ability utilization. These data suggested that MSQ scales

have adequate internal consistency reliabilities (Dawis, England et al., 1967).

The ECI is valid and reliable. For total other ratings, the internal consistency

reliability coefficients of this survey instrument ranged from .68 transparency to .87

emotional self-awareness; for the self-ratings, the consistency coefficients ranged from

.47 conflict management to .76 inspirational leadership (Hay Group, 2006). These results

supported the adequate consistency reliability of the ECI test (Hay group, 2006).

Summary

Chapter 3 included the rationale for the methodology adopted in the study and a

summary of the target population. The chapter also contained a discussion of selection of

the sample, the informed consent process, the instrumentation, the data collection and

data analysis processes, and the validity and reliability of the instruments. A quantitative

correlational study was designed to examine the nature and the extent of relationships

between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction of 80 employees randomly selected

from a furniture and bedding retail distribution center.

To organize the data collected and to visualize the correlation between emotional

intelligence competencies and job satisfaction more effectively, the software package, the

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (2003) was used to create tables and

graphs. Chapter 4 presents an analysis of the relationships between emotional intelligence

competencies as defined in the ECI and General Job Satisfaction as defined in the MSQ.
79

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS

The purpose of this quantitative research study was to search for relationships

between the General Job Satisfaction of full-time employees at a furniture and bedding

distribution center located in northeastern state in the United States as measured by the

MSQ, and emotional intelligence competencies defined in the ECI questionnaires. The

review of the literature revealed that emotional intelligence accounts for variance in job

performance that cannot be associated to either intelligence quotient or technical skills

(Emmerling & Goleman, 2003).

In order to maintain organizational effectiveness in today’s highly competitive

industry, many retail organizations have adopted organizational and technological

changes. Although changes are important ingredients for success, many of the changes

that had been established in the organization to ease employees’ jobs have also led to

negative outcomes (Broadbridge et al., 2000). Identifying the emotional intelligence

competencies that are predictive of job satisfaction would help in developing strategies

and programs that organizations could use in hiring decisions to select the most

appropriate employees and to mitigate job dissatisfaction.

In Chapter 1, the problem of the study was presented and the purpose of the study

and the significance of the study were discussed. Chapter 2 included the review of

literature pertinent to the research question, the hypotheses and the variables, and the

current findings. Chapter 3 summarized the methodology adopted to conduct the current

research study was presented. Chapter 4 presents the results of a quantitative exploration

of potential relationships between emotional intelligence competencies and the job

satisfaction of 80 employees. The sample was randomly selected from a population of


80

200 full-time employees at four sites of a furniture and bedding distribution center

located in a northeastern state in the United States.

Hypotheses

Correlation analysis was used to explore the relationships between the 12

emotional intelligence competencies scores of ECI defined as independent variables and

the General Job Satisfaction score of MSQ, defined as the dependent variable. The 12 EI

competencies included: “(a) emotional self-awareness, (b) achievement orientation, (c)

adaptability, and (d) emotional self-control. Additional EI competencies included (e)

positive outlook, (f) empathy, (g) organizational awareness, (h) conflict management, (i)

coach and mentor, (j) influence, (k) inspirational leadership, and (l) teamwork” (Hay

Group, 2007, p. 6).

The correlation analysis tested the following hypotheses that guided the current

research study:

Ho1: There is no significant relationship between emotional self-awareness as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha1: There is a significant relationship between emotional self-awareness as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho2: There is no significant relationship between achievement orientation as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha2: There is a significant relationship between achievement orientation as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho3: There is no significant relationship between adaptability as defined by the

ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.


81

Ha3: There is a significant relationship between adaptability as defined by the

ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho4: There is no significant relationship between emotional self-control as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha4: There is a significant relationship between emotional self-control as defined

by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho5: There is no significant relationship between positive outlook as defined by

the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha5: There is a significant relationship between positive outlook as defined by the

ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho6: There is no significant relationship between empathy as defined by the ECI,

and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha6: There is a significant relationship between empathy as defined by the ECI,

and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho7: There is no significant relationship between organizational awareness as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha7: There is a significant relationship between organizational awareness as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho8: There is no significant relationship between conflict management as defined

by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha8: There is a significant relationship between conflict management as defined

by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.


82

Ho9: There is no significant relationship between coaching and mentoring as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha9: There is a significant relationship between coaching and mentoring as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho10: There is no significant relationship between influence, as defined by the

ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha10: There is a significant relationship between influence as defined by the ECI,

and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho11: There is no significant relationship between inspirational leadership as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha11: There is a significant relationship between inspirational leadership as

defined by the ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ho12: There is no significant relationship between teamwork as defined by the

ECI, and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

Ha12: There is a significant relationship between teamwork as defined by the ECI,

and General Job Satisfaction as defined by the MSQ.

The ECI survey was used to measure the independent variables of the study that

comprised the12 emotional intelligence competencies: “(a) emotional self-awareness, (b)

achievement orientation, (c) adaptability, and (d) emotional self-control, (e) positive

outlook, (f) empathy, (g) organizational awareness, (h) conflict management, (i) coach

and mentor, (j) influence, (k) inspirational leadership, and (l) teamwork” (Hay Group,

2007, p. 6). The MSQ was used to score the General Job Satisfaction scale using the

following 20 items: “24, 25, 28, 30, 35, 43, 51, 61, 66, 67, 69, 72, 74, 77, 82, 93, 96, 98,
83

99, and 100” (Dawis, England et al., 1967, p. 4) (see Table 2).

To reduce the disparity that may exist between self-rating, five participants,

randomly selected among the sample, were asked to rate each participant. The average of

the self-scores and the scores of other raters were calculated for each competency for

each person and used as the score of the independent variables. The Statistical Package

for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to analyze the data collected and to visualize the

relationships.
84

Findings

According to the descriptive statistics provided by the human resources

department, the majority of the population in the distribution center was between the ages

of 18 and 45 (69.5%). The majority in the sample was between the ages of 18 and 45

(68%). The remaining participants were split 25% between the ages of 46 and 55, 8%

between the ages of 56 and 65, and no employees over 66 years of age (see Figure 2).

Participant Ages

25
st
n
a 20
p
ic
it
ra 15
p
f
o10
r
e
b
m5
u
N
0
18 to 25 26 to 35 36 to 45 46 to 55 56 to 65 66 and over
Ages

Figure 2. Participant Ages Established in Ranges

Of the 80 employees who agreed to participate in the study after being selected

using a randomized technique, 45 were female (56%) and 35 were male (44%). The

ethnicity was classified as follows: 48% of the employees in the sample were White,

while 40% were Hispanic, 11% were Black or African American, and 1% was Asian (see

Table 3).
85

Table 2

Traits used in MSQ With Items Which Addressed Each Trait

Scale Items

Ability utilization 7 27 47 67 87

Achievement 19 39 59 79 99

Activity 20 40 60 80 100

Advancement 14 34 54 74 94

Authority 6 26 46 66 86

Company policies and practices 9 29 49 69 89

Compensation 12 32 52 72 92

Co-workers 16 36 56 76 96

Creativity 2 22 42 62 82

Independence 4 24 44 64 84

Moral values 3 23 43 63 83

Recognition 18 38 58 78 98

Responsibility 17 37 57 77 97

Security 11 31 51 71 91

Social service 1 21 41 61 81

Social status 8 28 48 68 98

Supervision-human relations 10 30 50 70 90

Supervision-technical 15 35 55 75 95

Variety 5 25 45 65 85

Working conditions 13 33 53 73 93
86

With regard to educational level, 36 participants had some college level (45%),

while 26 participants had high school level (33%), 15 participants graduated from college

(19%), and 3 participants had grade school education (4%).

Out of 80 employees surveyed, 28 employees were in the present occupation for a

year or less (35%), 20 employees were employed in the present occupation between 2

and 5 years (25%), 14 employees were employed in their present occupation between 6

and 10 years (18%), 16 employees were employed between 11 and 20 years (20%), 2

employees were in their present occupation between 21 and 30 years (3%), and no

employee was reported in the present occupation for 31 years and over.

The descriptive statistics of the dependent variable (Y) General Job Satisfaction

and the independent variables of emotional intelligence as defined in the ECI test follow.

All the participants responded to the survey questionnaires. The descriptive analyses

revealed the following conclusions.

General Job Satisfaction scores indicated an overall satisfaction of the participants

toward their job. The General Job Satisfaction scores ranged from a minimum 31 to a

maximum 97. The mean score of 65.3 indicated an overall satisfaction of the sample

surveyed toward their job. The mode was 67, and the standard deviation (SD) of 17.5

helped in the determination of the coefficient of variation (CV) of .27, which indicated

the variation in the General Job Satisfaction scores. The results for influence indicated

that employees in the sample sometimes exhibited this competency. The scores ranged

from a minimum 1.9 to a maximum 4.4. The mean score was 3.31, and the mode score

was 3.67. The standard deviation score was .45, and the coefficient of variation of .14

indicated 14% variation in influence scores (see Table 4).


87

Table 3

Participant Ethnicity by Gender given in Number and Percentage

Female % Male %

Asian 0 0% 1 1%

Black/African American 2 3% 7 9%

Hispanic 20 25% 12 15%

White 23 29% 15 19%

Total 45 56% 35 44%

Correlation Statistics

The correlation coefficients between the variables were represented in the

correlation matrix on Table 4. The analysis of the data included all the responses

collected from the 80 participants. There was not missing data and the degree of freedom

(df) associated with the correlations was determined by the formula (df = n – 2). The

sample size n = 80 and the degree of freedom (df) = 80-2=78.

The correlation analysis results indicated that all of the emotional intelligence

competencies were significantly related to each other. The highest correlation among

independent variables was found between conflict management and inspirational

leadership (r (78) = .809, p < .01). Only one of the emotional intelligence competencies

was significantly related to General Job Satisfaction. Influence was positively and

significantly correlated with General Job Satisfaction (r (78) = .249, p < .05). The null

hypothesis Ho10, There is no statistically significant relationship between Influence and

General Job Satisfaction was rejected.


88

Table 4

Descriptive Statistics of Variables in the Study

Descriptive Statistics of the Sample Mean Mode SD CV

MSQ General Satisfaction (Y) 65.25 67.00 17.50 0.27

ECI Emotional Self-Awareness (X1) 3.48 3.75 0.34 0.10

ECI Achievement Orientation (X2) 3.91 4.08 0.34 0.09

ECI Adaptability (X3) 3.86 4.08 0.32 0.08

ECI Emotional Self-Control (X4) 3.90 3.83 0.30 0.08

ECI Positive Outlook (X5) 3.92 3.75 0.29 0.07

ECI Empathy (X6) 3.73 3.67 0.28 0.07

ECI Organizational Awareness (X7) 3.80 3.67 0.35 0.09

ECI Conflict Management (X8) 3.69 3.42 0.38 0.10

ECI Coach and Mentor (X9) 3.04 3.25 0.51 0.17

ECI Influence (X10) 3.31 3.67 0.45 0.14

ECI Inspirational Leadership (X11) 3.59 3.92 0.42 0.12

ECI Teamwork (X12) 4.10 4.00 0.31 0.08

Legend: CV: Coefficient of Variation SD: Standard Deviation

“Emotional self-awareness, achievement orientation, adaptability, emotional self-

control, positive outlook, organizational awareness, conflict management, coach and

mentor, inspirational leadership, and teamwork” (Hay Group, 2007, p. 6) were positively,

but not significantly, correlated with General Job Satisfaction. Because empathy was

negatively but not significantly correlated with General Job Satisfaction (r (78) = -.065, p

> .05), the null hypothesis Ho6 was also retained. Figures G-1 to G-12 (see Appendix G)
89

illustrate the correlations found between General Job Satisfaction and each emotional

intelligence competency measured by the ECI test.

The correlation analysis examined the effects of the independent variables of

emotional intelligence competencies as defined in the ECI test on the dependent variable:

General Job Satisfaction. With an alpha level of .05, the analysis of the correlation matrix

and the scatter plots indicated that only one of the emotional intelligence competencies

was significantly correlated to General Job Satisfaction. The competency influence was

positively and significantly correlated with General Job Satisfaction (r (78) = .249, p <

.05). The results led to the rejection of the null hypothesis Ho10: There is no statistically

significant relationship between influence and General Job Satisfaction.

Conclusions

The correlation analysis indicated that of the 12 emotional intelligence

competencies studied; only Influence was positively and significantly correlated with the

dependent variable General Job Satisfaction. Given that 12 correlation analyses were

conducted and only one of the 12 independent variables (Influence) was significantly

related to the dependent variable (General Job Satisfaction), the correlation found

between these variables could be purely the result of chance. The Statistical Package for

the Social Sciences (SPSS) outputs provided the matrix showing the inter correlations

among the variables. The correlation analyses included all the responses of the 80

participants and the degree of freedom (df) of the correlations was 78. The American

Research Group, Inc. (2002) statistical formula was used to determine the sample size of

80 participants that was needed for the results of the study to be significant at the alpha

level of .05 with a confidence level 95%.


90

Given that the study consisted of 12 correlations, the Bonferroni method was

employed to reduce the risk of a Type-I error in the analysis by adjusting the alpha level

of .05 downward to .0042 to account for chance capitalization. The statistical program

was not able to provide output for very small p-values. As advised on the Simple

Interactive Statistical Analysis software (SISA) website, the analysis was performed at

.05 alpha levels, and separate research studies were recommended to confirm the

relationship found among the variables (see Table 5). Chapter 5 includes a summary of

the findings of the study and a discussion of the implications and the recommendations

for future research studies.


91

Table 5

Matrix Showing Correlation Coefficients between Variables

Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12

Y 1.00

X1 .05 1.00

X2 .14 .45* 1.00

X3 .15 .50* .59* 1.00

X4 .11 .33* .41* .59* 1.00

X5 .11 .46* .47* .57* .48* 1.00

X6 -.06 .63* .44* .69* .55* .60* 1.00

X7 .08 .68* .46* .56* .42* .62* .61* 1.00

X8 .18 .64* .48* .66* .38* .56* .57* .72* 1.00

X9 .07 .51* .53* .58* .38* .47* .58* .68* .67* 1.00

X10 .25** .63* .55* .66* .27** .45* .47* .59* .80* .66* 1.00

X11 .18 .59* .62* .73* .46* .63* .67* .73* .81* .75* .76* 1.00

X12 .19 .45* .56* .71* .52* .55* .64* .56* .61* .61* .56* .69* 1.00

*Correlation is significant at the .01 level (2-tailed)

**Correlation is significant at the .05 level (2-tailed)


92

Legend:

Y:General Job Satisfaction

X1:Emotional Self-Awareness

X2:Achievement Orientation

X3:Adaptability

X4:Emotional Self-Control

X5:Positive Outlook

X6:Empathy

X7:Organizational Awareness

X8:Conflict Management

X9:Coach and Mentor

X10:Influence

X11:Inspirational Leadership

X12:Teamwork
93

CHAPTER: 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Emotionally intelligent employees are more likely to demonstrate a better level of

life satisfaction (Law et al., 2004; Sy et al., 2006). A concern has arisen among the

management team of the selected furniture and bedding distribution center regarding

methods to mitigate employees’ job dissatisfaction in today’s changing organization.

Elfenbein (2006) contended that emotional intelligence aptitudes of team members can

predict the performance of the team as a whole. Emotional intelligence can create a

pleasant work environment and affects job satisfaction, efficient management and

organization management (Patra, 2004). The ability to identify emotional intelligence

competencies related to job satisfaction and to develop employee programs to mitigate

job dissatisfaction should improve the level of organization performance in the context of

organizational change.

The purpose of the present quantitative study using correlational analysis was to

determine the relationships between the independent variables: emotional intelligence

competencies as measured by the ECI test, and the dependent variable: General Job

Satisfaction as scored by the MSQ among the employees of furniture and bedding

distribution center located in a northeastern state in the United States. In Chapter 5, the

major findings, the implications of the research, and conclusions and recommendations

are discussed.

Summary of Findings

Given that only one of the12 correlations was significant, the correlation found

between the independent variable Influence and the dependent variable General Job

Satisfaction could be simply a chance occurrence. Future research studies using different
94

samples, different methodologies, and different survey instruments may be necessary to

explain more clearly the association between the variables. The scatter plots were used to

visualize the relationships identified in the correlation matrix (see Appendix G). The

correlation analysis results also indicated that all of the independent variables of

emotional intelligence were significantly related to each other.

Implications

The research study was important because employee commitment and job

satisfaction have been important to organizational psychologists and practitioners for the

past decades. In the study, General Job Satisfaction indicated the feelings of employees

toward their job, and encompassed both the hygiene’s category and motivator’s category

defined by Herzberg et al. (1959). In research, emotional intelligence has received

growing attention when exploring the factor of work and life success (Howard, 2008).

The research study investigated the relations between emotional intelligence

competencies and General Job Satisfaction. Martinez-Pons (1997) contended that

emotional intelligence is correlated with life satisfaction. From an organizational

perspective, identifying emotional intelligence competencies leading to high General Job

Satisfaction and developing management strategies to mitigate job dissatisfaction may

alleviate the stressors experienced in today’s changing environment (Broadbridge et al.,

2000) and motivate employees to develop to their full potential in the organization.

While the literature review supported the view that EI can create a pleasant

working environment and affects an employee’s job satisfaction (Patra, 2004), more

recent studies have not supported that position (Bar-on, 1997). Along with several of the

studies listed in literature review, the present study did not find significant relationships
95

between the emotional intelligence competencies and General Job. Of the 12 correlations

studied, only one independent variable (the influence competency) was significantly

related to job satisfaction. The correlation found between the variables could be simply a

chance occurrence. The study presented certain limitations that need to be taken into

consideration when reviewing the results.

Limitations

The present study did not address concerns and issues other than the ones listed in

the research questions. Although the research design was sufficient to ensure the validity

and reliability of the findings, the results of this analysis may have been influenced by

some limitations inherent in the scope of the study. Limitations may have included the

sample size selected to conduct this study. The number of participants in other studies

ranged from 23 (Ford, 2010) and 68 (Johnson, L., 2008) to 3866 (Wong, C-S., Wong, P-

N., & Peng, 2010) and 267 (Guleryuz et al., 2008).

The present study involved the perspective of 80 participants, all of whom worked

at the single distribution center. The study did not distinguish between the employees

position and the sample included both employees in management position and those not

in management position. While the selection of employees using a randomized technique

lowered the number of intervening variables, it is possible that different sample size

including specific position level could yield to different results. The results of this study

should not be taken as completely representative of the entire furniture and bedding

distribution center.

Another limitation involved the instrument used in the present study, the

Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI), one of many survey instruments available to


96

measure EI is a 360-degree survey instrument derived from emotional competencies

identified by Golemen and Hay/McBer along with Boyatzis’s Self-Assessment

Questionnaire (Wolff, 2005). Each instrument approaches the topic of EI differently,

testing different aspects of the human ability. For instance, the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso

Emotional Intelligence Test is an “ability-based test designed to measure the four

branches of the EI model of Mayer and Salovey” (EI Consortium, 2010). The Bar-On

Emotional Quotient Inventory was developed as an individual inventory and a 360 model

to assess the Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence, requiring 30 minutes to

complete (EI Consortium, 2010a; Multi-Health, 2010). The Emotional Intelligence

Appraisal measures emotional intelligence using four core skills based upon Goleman’s

model and takes 10 minutes to complete (EI Consortium, 2010b; TalentSmart, 2010).

Other reviewed studies employed the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory

(Millet, 2007; Steward, 2008), the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test

(Hendee, 2002), the Emotional Intelligence Appraisal Survey (Johnson, L. 2008), the

Emotional Judgment Inventory (Pardee, 2009), Emotional Intelligence Quotient

(Muhammad, 2006), the Emotional Intelligence Assessment (Feyerabend, 2009), the

Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (Teehan, 2006), along with interviews and

observations (McCallin & Bamford, 2007). The variance in survey instruments could

have been responsible for differences in results of the studies because each instrument

assesses differently emotional intelligence. The use of the survey instruments could also

provide an opportunity to the participants to distort the responses to their advantage

because of the sensitive nature of some of the questionnaires. While the participants were

assured of complete confidentiality of their responses, it could be possible that some


97

participants doubted whether or not the anonymity of the responses would remain

protected when answering to some sensitive questionnaires.

The context of organizational change and global economic recession atmosphere

in which the study was conducted could have influenced the participant’s answers to

some questionnaires. The responses to some job related questionnaires could have been

influenced by the lack of job opportunities available during this particular time. The halo

effect, which is referred to as unconscious judgment bias, could influence participant’s

answers to some questionnaires.

The participants in the study were randomly selected from one furniture and

bedding distribution center located in a northeastern state in the United States. The study

was limited in scope to single furniture and bedding distribution center in one geographic

location. The results of this research can only be generalized to furniture and bedding

distribution industries that share similar characteristics. The same limitation may be

applied to each of the studies conducted on the topic of emotional intelligence.

Delimitations

The sample size of 80 was small to generalize the findings of the study across the

entire furniture and bedding retail industry, presenting a limitation that must be

considered when generalizing the findings. The study was intended to answer to the

question: What is the relationship between EI and General Job Satisfaction, using the 20-

item general satisfaction scale. The study was not designed to analyze the other 20 five-

item scales of job satisfaction measured by the MSQ such as “ability utilization,

achievement, activity, advancement, authority, company policies, compensation,

coworkers, creativity, independence, moral value, recognition, responsibility, security,


98

social service, social status, supervision-human relations, supervision-technical, variety,

and working conditions” (Dawis, England et al., 1967, p. 3).

The study was set to accept or to reject the null hypothesis at the .05 alpha levels.

Although the research design was sufficient to ensure validity and reliability, the present

study surveyed a narrow sample from single furniture and bedding distribution and the

findings should not be taken as significant for the entire furniture and bedding retail

industry. The results of the present study could be generalized only to similar situations at

the distribution center surveyed.

Conclusions

The alternative hypothesis (Ha10) predicted a significantly positive relationship

between Influence and General Job Satisfaction. Given that the study analyzed 12

correlations, the one variable that was significantly related to job satisfaction may have

been a chance occurrence. The results of the correlation analysis revealed weak

relationships between the other independent variables of emotional intelligence:

“teamwork, inspirational leadership, conflict management, adaptability, achievement

orientation, emotional self-control, positive outlook, organizational awareness, coach and

mentor, and emotional self-awareness” (Hay Group, 2007, p. 6), and the dependent

variable General Job Satisfaction. Because the relationships did not achieve a level of

statistical significance for evaluation, further research using a different approach or

method will be needed to explain these associations.

According to past research, emotional intelligence has been found to ease the

stress experienced by employees, thereby enhancing their productivity (Hosseinian et al.,

2008). Emotions can create assurance and commitment, which may increase job
99

satisfaction and productivity in the organization (Cooper, 1998). The current research

study did not find enough evidence to conclude any significant relationships between

emotional intelligence competencies and General Job Satisfaction. The findings of the

present research study may trigger other related research studies using different settings

to help organizational leaders to understand the importance of human capability and to

improve both job satisfaction and productivity by paying more attention to psychological

issues involved in employment (Hosseinian et al., 2008).

Recommendations

Based on the findings resulting from the current study, further exploration of the

effect of emotional intelligence competencies on job satisfaction by using a larger sample

size, an extended data collection period, different groups of participants, and a

multidisciplinary research team may prove worthwhile. While the present research study

employed a quantitative research design to assess the relationships between Emotional

Intelligence and General Job Satisfaction, future researchers may select samples from

other distribution centers or other industries and employ qualitative research designs to

explore the relationships and probe for deeper understanding.

A second recommendation is for researchers to use these findings to consider a

research study that would explore the unique predictive value of each of the independent

variables of emotional intelligence competencies to General Job Satisfaction. The same

instruments, the ECI and the MSQ, could be used or replaced by other instruments. Such

study might offer greater insight into the valence of each EI competency compared to one

another.
100

A third recommendation is to make the results of this study available to all the

employees at the furniture and bedding distribution center. Understanding the role of the

environment and individual competencies with regard to Emotional Intelligence may

assist employees in taking advantage of the opportunities provided to them within the

organization to develop personally and professionally. The results of the study may also

inspire further research studies on human factors that influence employee job satisfaction

and productivity. As employees seek to develop their skills and employers strive for

greater productivity, the influence of Emotional Intelligence may be the key to reframing

the management paradigm within the organization.

A fourth recommendation is to consider surveying employees in a management

position separately from non-managers. Separating the sample by employment categories

could help in discerning competencies specific to each category. This information could

be helpful to management when planning trainings and in job placement and promotions.

A fifth recommendation is for organizational leaders to use the results of the

current study to increase awareness of the importance of human capability in improving

job satisfaction and productivity. While the competence Influence was the only EI

competence significantly related to job satisfaction, the other competences defined in the

ECI test “Emotional self-awareness, achievement orientation, adaptability, emotional

self-control, positive outlook, organizational awareness, conflict management, coach and

mentor, inspirational leadership, and teamwork” (Hay Group, 2006, p. 6) were all

positively, but not significantly, correlated with General Job Satisfaction. By

incorporating the results into management training seminars and workshops, managers

might develop their competencies of Emotional Intelligence to achieve organizational


101

purposes. Those purposes would include increased profits based on higher productivity

because of more satisfied employees.

A sixth recommendation is to consider surveying different subgroups of

participants (male versus female and different age groups) to evaluate how the different

subgroups score on ECI test and MSQ. If emotional intelligence competency alone

uniquely predicts General Job Satisfaction, the areas of study for management and

leadership in the 21st century are ready for engagement. The results among different age

groups and genders might elicit different applications of Emotional Intelligence in the

workplace.

Summary

With increasing competition and continual change within the business

environment, many retail organizations are faced with a new economic rationality that

results in employee apathy (Appelbaum, Everard et al., 1999; Appelbaum, Simpson et al.,

1987b) and detrimental behavior (Zeffane, 1993). Recent research studies concluded that

emotional intelligence can assist in repairing negative feelings and decreasing life’s

dissatisfaction (Boyatzis, Goleman, & McKee, 2002; Goleman, 1989; Matthews, Roberts,

& Zeidner, 2002). Emotional intelligence has also been shown to predict organizational

outcomes such as employees’ motivation, organizational commitment, organizational

citizenship (Sy et al., 2006; Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2004), and life satisfaction

(Martinez-Pons, 1997). The purpose of the present correlational study was to determine

the relationships between Emotional Intelligence competencies as defined in the ECI test

and General Job Satisfaction as scored by MSQ among employees of a furniture and

bedding distribution center located in a northeastern state in the United States.


102

REFERENCES

Abraham, R. (2000). The role of job control as a moderator of emotional dissonance and

emotional intelligence-outcome relationships. The Journal of Psychology, 134(2),

169-184. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from ProQuest database.

Adams, D. M., Eby, L. T., Gaby, S. H., & Russell, J. E. A. (2000). Perceptions of

organizational readiness for change: Factors related to employees’ reactions to the

implementation of team based selling. Human Relations, 53(3), 419-442.

Retrieved June 24, 2009, from ProQuest database.

Ajay Goyal, K. B. (2007). Interplay among innovativeness, cognitive intelligence,

emotional intelligence and social capital of work teams. Team Performance

Management, 13(7/8), 206-226. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from ProQuest

database.

Amram, J. Y. (2009). The contribution of emotional and spiritual intelligences to

effective business leadership. (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Transpersonal

Psychology, United States--California). Retrieved on June 2, 2009, from ProQuest

Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT3344514)

Appelbaum, S. H., Simpson, R. & Shapiro, B. T. (1987a), The tough test of downsizing.

Organizational Dynamics, 16(2), 68-79. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from ProQuest

database.

Appelbaum, S. H., Simpson, R. & Shapiro, B. T. (1987b), Downsizing: the ultimate

human resource strategy. Business Quarterly, 52(2), 52-60. Retrieved June 24,

2009, from ProQuest database.


103

Appelbaum, S. H., Everard, A. & Hung, L. T. S. (1999) Strategic downsizing: critical

success factors. Management Decision, 37(7), 535-552. Retrieved June 24, 2009,

from ProQuest database.

Bailie, K., & Ekermans, G. (2006). An exploration of the utility of a self-report emotional

intelligence measure. E-Journal of Applied Psychology: Emotional Intelligence,

2(2), 3-11. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://ojs.lib.swin.edu.au/index.php/ejap

/article/viewFile/67/96

Balzer, W. K., Kihm, J. A., Smith, P. C., Irwin, J. L., Bachiochi, P. D., Robie, C., . . .

Parra, L. F. (1997). Users’ manual for the Job Descriptive Index (JDI)

and the Job in General (JIG) Scales. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State

University.

Bandelli, A. C. (2008). Facilitating communication and effective interpersonal

relationships at work: A theoretical model of socio-affective competence.

(Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, United States--Florida).

Retrieved on May 25, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database.

(AAT 3347311)

Bar-On, R. (1998). Bar-On emotional quotient inventory (EQ-I): Technical manual.

Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

Barone, F. J., McCarthy, A. M., Sojka, J. Z., & Tucker, M. L. (2000). Training

tomorrow's leaders: Enhancing the emotional intelligence of business graduates.

Journal of Education for Business, 75(6), 331. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from

Academic OneFile database.


104

Barr, R., Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., & Pearson, D. (2002). The handbook of reading

research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Becker, T. (2003). Is emotional intelligence a viable concept? Academy of Management

Review, 28, 192-195. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from ABI/INFORM Complete

database.

Bennis, W. (1998). Old dogs, new tricks. Provo, UT: Executive Excellence Publishing.

Berman, E. M., & West, J. P. (2008). Managing emotional intelligence in U.S. cities: A

study of social skills among public managers. Public Administration Review,

68(4), 742. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from ABI/INFORM Complete database.

Bernstein, I. H., & Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York:

McGraw Hill.

Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., Walberg, H. J., & Zins, J. E. (2004). The scientific

base linking social and emotional learning to school success. In J. E. Zins, R. P.

Weissberg, M. Wang, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Building academic success on

social and emotional learning: What does the research say? (pp. 3–22). New

York: Teachers College Press.

Bonner, M., Koch, T., & Langmeyer, D. (2004). Organizational theory applied to school

reform: A critical analysis. School Psychology International, 25(4), 455-471.

Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://spi.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract

/25/4/455

Boyatzis, R., Goleman, D., & McKee. A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power

of emotional intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.


105

Boyatzis, R., Goleman, D., & Rhee. K. (2000). Clustering competence in emotional

intelligence: Insights from the Emotional Competence Inventory. In R. Bar-On &

J. D. Parker (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development,

assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp. 343-362).

San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Boyatzis, R. E., & Kolb, D. A. (1991). Assessing individuality in learning: The learning

skills profile. Educational Psychology, 11(3/4), 279-295.

Brackett, M. A., Palomera, R., Mojsa-Kaja, J., Reyes, M. R., & Salovey, P. (2010).

Emotion-regulation ability, burnout, and job satisfaction among British

secondary-school teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 47(4), 406-417. Retrieved

September 14, 2010, from EBSCOhost database.

Bradshaw, F. B. (2008) Exploring the relationship between emotional intelligence and

academic achievement in African American female college students. (Doctoral

dissertation, College of Notre Dame of Maryland, United States--Maryland).

Retrieved June 2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database.

(AAT3304794)

Bridwell, L. G., & Wahba, M. A. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on

the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15,

212-240.

Broadbridge, A., Swanson, V., & Taylor, C. (2000). Retail change: Effects on

employees’ job demands and home life. International Review of Retail,

Distribution, and Consumer Research 10, 417-432.


106

Brooks, N. (2006). Understanding IT outsourcing and its potential effects on IT workers

and their environment. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(4), 46-53.

Retrieved June 24, 2009, from ProQuest database.

Brown, K. D. (2005, May). Relationship between emotional intelligence of leaders and

motivational behavior of employees. (Doctoral dissertation, University of

Phoenix, United States--Arizona). Retrieved March 1, 2008, from ProQuest

Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3183509)

Brown, S. L., & Stys, Y. (2004, March). A review of the emotional intelligence literature

and implications for correction. Research Branch Correctional Service of

Canada, R-150. Retrieved March 2008, from http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text

/rsrch/reports/r150/r150_e.pdf

Bryan, S. P. (2006, April). Emotional intelligence and intrapersonal conversation. Issues

and Recent Developments in Emotional Intelligence. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from

Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations Web site:

http://www.eiconsortium.org

Busso, L. (2003). The relationship between emotional intelligence and contextual

performance as influenced by job satisfaction and focus of control orientation.

(Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, United States--California).

Retrieved March 1, 2008, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database.

(AAT3 108281)

Caldwell, R. (2005). Things fall apart? Discourses on agency and change in

organizations. Human Relations, 58(1), 83-114. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from

Academic OneFile database.


107

Callan, V. J., Jones, E. S., & Martin, A. J. (2005). The role of organizational

psychological climate in facilitating employee adjustment during organizational

change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 263-

289. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://www.informaworld.com/smpp

/content~db=all~content=a729234440.

Carr, A. (2004). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths.

New York: Brunner-Routledge.

Caruso, D. R., Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (2000a). Models of emotional intelligence. In

R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 396-420).

New York: Cambridge University Press.

Caruso, D. R., Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (2000b). Selecting a measure of emotional

intelligence. The case for ability scales. In R. Bar-On & J. D. Parker (Eds.),

Handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and

application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp. 320-342). San Francisco:

Jossey Bass.

Cherniss, C., & Goleman, D. (2001). The emotionally intelligent workplace: How to

measure, and improve emotional intelligence in individuals, groups and

organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Chiva, R. & Alegre, J. (2008). Emotional intelligence and job satisfaction: The role of

organizational learning capability. Personnel Review, 37(6), 680-701. Retrieved

September 13, 2010, from ProQuest database.

Coco, C. M. (2009). Emotional intelligence and job satisfaction: The EQ relationship for

deans of U.S. business schools. (Doctoral dissertation, Anderson University,


108

United States—Indiana). Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ProQuest Theses

and Dissertations database. (AAT 3388932)

Cooper, C., & Roney, A. (1997). Professionals on workplace stress: The essential facts.

Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Cooper, C. L., & Schabracq, M. J. (1998). Flexibility of labor, well-being, and stress.

International Journal of Stress Management, 4(4), 259. Retrieved June 24, 2009,

from Academic OneFile database.

Craig, J. B. (2008). The relationship between the emotional intelligence of the principal

and teacher job satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania,

United States--Pennsylvania). Retrieved June 2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and

Dissertations database. (AAT 3310476)

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods

approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Crump, L. V. (2008). Exploratory study of retention and emotional intelligence in public

health: The case of the Coastal Health District, GA. (Doctoral dissertation,

Capella University, United States--Minnesota). Retrieved June 2, 2009, from

ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3329823)

Davies, M., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D. (1998). Emotional intelligence: In search of an

elusive construct. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 75(4), 989-1015.

Retrieved June 24, 2009, from ABI/INFORM Complete database.


109

Davis, C. R. (1996). The administrative rational model and public organization theory.

Administration & Society, 28(1), 39. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from

ABI/INFORM Complete database.

Davis, J. A., Savage, G., Thomas-Stewart, R., & Chapman, R. C. (2003). Organizational

downsizing: A review of literature for planning and research. Journal of

Healthcare Management, 48(3), 181-201. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from

ABI/INFORM Complete database.

Dawis, R., England, G., Lofquist, L., & Weiss, D. (1967). Manual for Minnesota

satisfaction questionnaire. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Industrial

Relation Center.

Dawis, R., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An

individual differences model and its applications. Minneapolis, MN: University of

Minnesota Press.

Day, A. L., & Carroll, S. A. (2004). Using an ability-based measure of emotional

intelligence to predict individual performance, group performance, and group

citizenship behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(6), 1443-1458.

Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob

=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V9F-49C5CJF-2&_user=10&_coverDate

Druskat, V. U. & Wolff, S. B. (2001). Building the emotional intelligence of groups.

Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 80-90.

Dong, Q., & Howard, T. (2006). Emotional intelligence, trust and job satisfaction.

Competition Forum, 4(2), 381-388. Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ProQuest

database.
110

Dong, Q. (2006). Emotional Intelligence, Trust and Job Satisfaction. Competition Forum

4 (2) 381. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from ProQuest database

Douglas, C., Frink, D.D., & Ferris, G. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence as a moderator

of the relationship between conscientiousness and performance. Journal of

Leadership and Organizational Studies, 10(3),2-13.

Dulewicz, V., & Higgs, M. (2003). Leadership at the top: The need for emotional

intelligence in organizations. The International Journal of Organizational

Analysis, 11(3), 193-210. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from Business Source

Complete database.

Dunn, S. (2004). What emotional intelligence can do for your organization in 2004? The

CEO refresher: Brain food for business. Retrieved April 15, 2004, from

http://www.refresher.com/!sdcando.html

EI Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations. (2010a). Bar-On

Emotional Quotient Inventory—EQ-i. Retrieved from http://www.eiconsortium.

org/measures/eqi.html

EI Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations. (2010b). Mayer-

Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT). Retrieved from

http://www.eiconsortium.org/measures /msceit.html

Elfenbein, H. A. (2006). Team emotional intelligence: What it can mean and how it can

affect performance. In V. Druskat, F. Sala, & G. Mount (Eds.). Linking

emotional intelligence and performance at work: Current research evidence with

individuals and groups (pp. 165-184). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Feyerabend, R. O. (2009). The relationship of emotional intelligence, demographic


111

characteristics, and job satisfaction to Indian call center agents’ intentions to stay

on the job. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland University College,

United States—Maryland). Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ProQuest Theses

and Dissertations database. (AAT 3390410)

Fisher, C. D. (2003). Why do lay people believe that satisfaction and performance are

correlated? Possible sources of a commonsense theory. Journal of Organizational

Behavior, 24(6), 753-777. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from Business Source

Complete database.

Fitness, J., & Curtis, M. (2005). Emotional intelligence and the Trait Meta-Mood Scale:

Relationship with empathy, attributional complexity, self-control, and responses

to interpersonal conflict. E-Journal of Applied Psychology: Social Section, 1(1),

50-62. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://ojs.lib.swin.edu.au/index.php/ejap

/article/viewFile/6/15

Ford, J. M. (2010). Satisfaction: A study of front-line staff at a large healthcare

organization. (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, United States—

Minnesota). Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ProQuest Theses and

Dissertations database. (AAT 3409332)

Freeman, D. M., McManus, S. E., Russell, J. E. A., & Rohricht, M. T. (1995, August).

Factors related to employees’ perceptions of organizational readiness for change.

Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management,

Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Gaertner, K. N., & Nollen, S. D. (1989). Career experiences, perceptions of employment

practices and psychological commitment to the organization Human Relations,


112

42(11), 975-991. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from ABI/INFORM Complete

database.

Gasiorowska, G. M. (2007). A study of project managers' most dominant emotional

intelligence abilities and skills (Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University,

United States--California). Retrieved on June 2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and

Dissertations database. (AAT3271288)

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century.

New York: Basic Books.

George, D., & Mallory, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and

reference. Boston: Pearson Education.

Giesecke, j. (2007) Emotional intelligence Faculty Publication, University of Nebraska-

Lincoln, United States—Nebraska. Retrieved on September 10, 2010 from:

http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1136&context=libraryl

ibrary

Goleman, D. (1995) Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York:

Bantam Books.

Goleman, D. (1998). The emotional competence framework. The consortium for research

on emotional intelligence in organizations. Retrieved May 2, 2008, from

Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations Web site:

http://www.eiconsortium.org

Goleman, D. (2000). Emotional intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Goleman, D., & Emmerling, R. J. (2003). Emotional intelligence: Issues and common

misunderstandings. Issues and Recent Developments in Emotional Intelligence.


113

Retrieved May 1, 2008, from Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence

in Organizations Web site: http://www.eiconsortium.org

Greewald, A. G., & Klingner, M. R. (1994). Preferences need no inferences? The

cognitive basis of unconscious mere exposure effects. In P. M. Niedenthal & S.

Kitayama (Eds.), The heart’s eye (pp. 67-85). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Gribben, R. (2008, January 24). Managers opt out of office battleground survey finds

workplace stress and bullying taking their toll in climate of change. The Daily

Telegraph, p. 1. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from ProQuest database.

Güleryüz, G., Güney, S., Aydin, E. M., & Aȿan, P. O. (2008). The mediating effect of

job satisfaction between emotional intelligence and organizational commitment of

nurses: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(11),

1625-1635. Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ProQuest database.

Hanna, M. E. (2008). Emotional intelligence: Comparisons of criterion-related validity

across conceptual and methodological variants of measurement. (Doctoral

dissertation, Clemson University, United States—South Carolina). Retrieved June

2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3304058).

Harrison, S. J. (2006). A descriptive study describing the emotional intelligence abilities

of superintendents and identifying the personal and professional strategies they

utilize to develop and maintain high levels of emotional intelligence. Doctoral

dissertation, University of La Verne, United States—California). Retrieved June

2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3218804)

Hart, P. M., & Wearing, A. J. (1995). Police stress and well-being: Integrating personality,

coping and daily work experiences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational


114

Psychology, 68(2), 133-156. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from EBSCOhost database.

Harter, J. K., & Schmidt, F. L. (2006). Connecting employee satisfaction to business

unitperformance. In A. I. Kraut (Ed.). Getting action from organizational surveys:

New concepts, methods, and applications (pp. 33-52). San Francisco: Jossey-

Bass.

Harvey, R. (2007). Leadership development for front-line employees: An evaluative case

study. (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, United States--Minnesota).

Retrieved March 15, 2008, from the ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database.

(AAT 3284068)

Hay Group. (2006). Emotional Competence Inventory [Technical Manual]. Retrieved

September 15, 2008, from Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in

Organizations Website:

http://www.eiconsortium.org/pdf/ECI_2_0_Technical_Manual_v2.pdf

Hay Group (2007). The creation of the emotional and social competence inventory

(ESCI) Retrieved April 15, 2009, from

http://www.haygroup.com/Downloads/uk/misc/ESCI Article.pdf

Hendee, S. S. ((2002). Measurement of differences in emotional intelligence and job

satisfaction of practicing chefs and culinary educators as measured by the Mayer-

Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test and Spector’s Job Satisfaction

Survey. (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, United States—New York).

Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database.

(AAT 3045714)
115

Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.).

New York: Wiley.

Hosseinian, S., Fathi-Ashtiani, A., Yazdi, S-M., & Zahraie, S. (2008), Emotional

intelligence and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Science, 8(5), 903-906.

Retrieved June 24, 2009, from http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2008.903.906

Howard, M. C. (2009). Emotional intelligence as a predictor of job satisfaction,

organizational commitment, and occupational commitment among human service

workers. (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, United States—Minnesota).

Retrieved May 1, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database.

(AAT3339294)

Humber, T. (2002). Emotional intelligence. Canadian HR Reporter, 15(16), p. G1-2.

Retrieved June 24, 2008, from ProQuest database.

Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Badawy, M. K. (1994). Work experiences, job

involvement, and quality of work life among information systems personnel, MIS

Quarterly, 18(2), 175-201. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from EBSCOhost database.

Johnson, L. R. (2008). An exploratory study of servant leadership, emotional intelligence,

and job satisfaction among high-tech employees. (Doctoral dissertation,

University of Phoenix, United States—Arizona). Retrieved September 12, 2010,

from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3371530)

Johnson, S. K. (2009). A study of benefits satisfaction among Florida's protective service

employees. (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, United States—

Minnesota). Retrieved June 2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations

database. (AAT3342213)
116

Johnson-Huff, D. (2006). A qualitative study of the perceptions held by first-year

elementary principals regarding the transition to administrator. (Doctoral

dissertation, University of La Verne, United States—California). Retrieved June

2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT3234490)

Karl, K. A. (2000). Trust & betrayal in the workplace: Building effective relationships in

your organization. [Book Review]. The Academy of Management Executive,

14(2), 133-34. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from ProQuest database.

Kinicki, A. J., McKee-Ryan, F. M., Schriesheim, C. A., & Carson, K. P. (2002).

Assessing the construct validity of the job descriptive index: A review and meta-

analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 14-32. Retrieved June 24, 2008,

from EBSCOhost database.

Lange, D. (2008) A correlational analysis of job satisfaction and intent to turnover in

community college organization. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix,

United States--Arizona). Retrieved April 30, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and

Dissertations database. (AAT 3322890)

Law, K. S., Wong, C., & Song, L. J. (2004). The construct and criterion validity of

emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of

Applied Psychology, 89(3), 483-496. Retrieved June 24, 2009, from

ABI/INFORM Global database.

Leadership Services, LTD. (n.d.). Emotional intelligence surveys. Retrieved from

http://www.leadershipservices.com/services-surveys-e-emotional-

intelligence.shtm

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.).
117

Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of

organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal

of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52-65. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from EBSCOhost

database.

Liddell, T. (2007). Learning and leading: Approaches to leadership self-development

among women executives of philanthropic organizations. (Doctoral dissertation,

Florida Atlantic University, United States--Florida). Retrieved March 26, 2008,

from the ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT3269545)

Little, I. S., & O’Connor, R. M., (2003). Revisiting the predictive validity of emotional

intelligence: Self-report versus ability-based measures. Personality and Individual

Differences, 35(8), 1893-1902. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from http://www.

sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V9F-488NTH7-

6&_user=10&_coverDate

Low, G., & Nelson, D. (2005, Spring). Emotional intelligence: The role of transformative

learning in academic excellence Texas Study Retrieved on July 30, 2008,

fromhttp://education.tamuk.edu/eiconf/EI_TransformativeLearning.pdf

Lugo, M. V. (2007). An examination of cultural and emotional intelligences in the

development of global transformational leadership skills. (Doctoral dissertation,

Walden University, United States—Minnesota). Retrieved June 2, 2009, from

ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT3283980)

Lusch, R. F., & Serpkenci, R. R. (1990). Personal differences, job tension, job outcomes,

and store performance: A study of retail managers. Journal of Marketing, 54(1),


118

85-101. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from EBSCOhost database.

Mack, D. A., Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (1998). The stress of organizational change: A

dynamic process model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47(2),

219-232. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from http://www.ingentaconnect.com

/content/psych/papr/1998/00000047/00000002/art00006

Martinez-Pons, M. (1997). The relation of emotional intelligence with selected areas of

personal functioning. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 17(1), 3-13.

Maslow, A. J. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.

Matthews, G., Roberts, R. D., & Zeidner, M. (2002). Emotional intelligence: Science

and myth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence.

Intelligence, 17(4), 433-442. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from Academic OneFile

database.

Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1995). Emotional intelligence and the construction and

regulation of feelings. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 4, 197-208. Retrieved

June 24, 2008, from Academic OneFile database.

Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D.

Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications

for educators (pp. 3-31). New York: Basic Books.


119

Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory,

findings and Implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197-215. Retrieved June

24, 2008, from ProQuest database.

Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan.

McCallin, A., & Bamford, A. (2007). Interdisciplinary teamwork: is the influence of

emotional intelligence fully appreciated? Journal of Nursing Management, 15(4),

386-391. Retrieved September 14, 2010, from EBSCOhost database.

McClellan, J. L. (2007) A correlational analysis of the relationship between

psychological hardiness and servant leadership among leaders in higher

education. (Doctoral dissertation, Gonzaga University, United States—

Washington). Retrieved June 2, 2008, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations

database. (AAT 3302245)

Millet, T. (2007). An examination of trait emotional intelligence factors: Their

relationship to job satisfaction among police officers. (Doctoral dissertation,

Capella University, United States—Minnesota). Retrieved March 5, 2008, from

ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3283704)

Mone, M.A. (1997), How we got along after the downsizing: post-downsizing trust as a

double-edged sword. Public Administration Quarterly, 21(3), 309-336. Retrieved

June 24, 2009, from ProQuest database.

Muchinsky, P. M. (2004). When the psychometrics of test development meets

organizational realities: A conceptual framework for organizational change,

examples, and recommendations. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 175-209.

Retrieved June 24, 2009, from Business Source Complete database.


120

Muhammad, D. T. (2006). The relationship between emotional intelligence and job

satisfaction: Testing the claim that emotional intelligence quotient predicts level

of job satisfaction. (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, United States—

Minnesota). Retrieved March 1, 2008, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations

database. (AAT 3196735)

Multi-Health Systems, Inc. (2010). Psychological assessments and services. Retrieved

from http://www.mhs.com/product.aspx?gr=cli&prod=eqi&id=overview

Ngwenya-Scoburgh, L. (2009). Organizational learning: An exploration of the influence

of capabilities and factors. (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, United

States—Minnesota). Retrieved June 2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and

Dissertations database. (AAT3350246)

Owens, R. G. (2004). Organizational behavior in education (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Ozmen, A. (2008). An analytical study of the impact of the perception of leadership styles

on job satisfaction within the Turkish National Police based on the Multifactor

Leadership Questionnaire. (Doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University,

United States--Texas). Retrieved June 2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and

Dissertations database. (AAT3329515)

Pardee, D. J. (2009). Emotional intelligence and job satisfaction among mental health

professionals. (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, United

States—Arizona). Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ProQuest Theses and

Dissertations database. (AAT 3370636)

Parker, J. D. A., Stone, H., & Wood, L. M. (2005). Report on the Ontario principals’

council leadership study. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Principal’s Council.


121

Patra, S. (2004) Role of emotional intelligence in educational management. Journal of

Indian Education., 30(1), 98-104.

Payne, W. L. (1986). A study of emotion: Developing emotional intelligence; Self-

integration; Relating to fear, pain and desire. (Doctoral dissertation, Union for

Experimenting Colleges and Universities, United States--Ohio). Retrieved June

24, 2008, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT8605928)

Pettigrew, A. (2000). Foreword. In N. M. Ashkenazy, C. P. M. Wilderom, & M. F.

Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks,

CA: Sage.

Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational

change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of

Management Review, 44(4), 697-713. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from

ABI/INFORM Complete database.

Platsidou, M. (2010). Trait emotional intelligence of Greek special education teachers in

relation to burnout and job satisfaction. School Psychology International, 31(1),

60-76. Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ProQuest database.

Poon, J. M. (2004). Career commitment and career success: Moderating role of emotion

perception. Career Development International, 9(4), 374. Retrieved June 24,

2009, from ProQuest database.

Porter, L. W. (1962). Job attitudes in management: Perceived deficiencies in need

fulfillment as a function of job level. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46(6), 375-

384. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from EBSCOhost database.


122

Price, J. L. (2001). Reflections on the determinants of voluntary turnover. International

Journal of Manpower, 22(7/8), 600-624. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from

ABI/INFORM Complete database.

Prins, A. (2006). Emotional intelligence and leadership in corporate management: A

fortigenic perspective (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State, South

Africa--Bloemfontein). Retrieved May 29, 2009, from http://etd.uovs.ac.za /ETD-

db//theses/available/etd-08232007-153223/unrestricted/PrinsA.pdf

Puschak, B. A. (2006). The interpersonal side of coaching: Exploring emotional

competencies and coach perspectives in the workplace. (Doctoral dissertation,

Widener University, United States—Pennsylvania). Retrieved June 2, 2009, from

ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3255647)

Quarstein, V. A., McAfee, R. B., & Glassman, M. (2002). The situational occurrences

theory of job satisfaction. Human Relations, 45(8), 859-873. Retrieved June 24,

2008, from Business Source Complete database.

Roberts, E., T. (2006) The relationship between emotional intelligence, sense of humor,

and job satisfaction in masters of business students at a Midwestern university.

(Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, United States) Retrieved on November

2, 2010, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3215971)

Robitaille, C. A. (2008). Emotional intelligence and teachers: An exploratory study of

differences between general and special education teachers. (Doctoral

dissertation, Union Institute and University, United States--Ohio). Retrieved June

2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3300400)


123

Rosenblatt, J. J., & Elias, M. J. (2008). Dosage effects of a preventive social emotional

learning intervention on achievement loss associated with middle school

transition. Journal of Primary Prevention, 29(6), 535. Retrieved June 24, 2008,

from ProQuest database.

Rozell, E. J., Pettijohn, C. E., & Parker, R. S. (2006). Emotional intelligence and

dispositional affectivity as predictors of performance in salespeople Journal of

Marketing Theory and Practice, 14(2), 113-124. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from

EBSCOhost database.

Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and

Personality, 9, 185-211. Retrieved October 6, 2009, from http://www.unh.edu

/emotional_intelligence/EI%20Assets/Reprints...EI%20Proper/EI1990%20Emotio

nal%20Intelligence.pdf

Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Bobik, C., Coston, T. D., Greeson, C., Jedicka, C. et al.

(2001). Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations. Journal of Social

Psychology, 141(4), 523-536. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from EBSCOhost

database.

Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper

Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Shields, D. (2008) Leaders’ emotional intelligence and discipline of personal mastery: A

mixed method analysis. (Doctoral dissertation, Cardinal Stritch University, United

States--Wisconsin). Retrieved June 2, 2009, from ProQuest Dissertations and

Theses database.
124

Seligman, M. E., Parks, A., & Steen, T. (2004). A balanced psychology and a full life.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological

Sciences, 359(1449), 1379-1381. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from EBSCOhost

database.

Shepherd-Osborne, T. (2009) Assessing the relationship between emotional intelligence

and organizational commitment among early childhood educators. (Doctoral

dissertation. Northcentral University, United States) Retrieved on November 2,

2010, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3384705)

Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis (2010). Retrieved on December 06, 2010 from

http://www.quantitativeskills.com/sisa/calculations/bonhlp.htm

Sims-Vanzant, C. (2007). Emotional intelligence and leadership practices among human

service program managers. (Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco,

United States—California). Retrieved on June 2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses

and Dissertations database. (AAT 3265690)

Sladyk, K., & Ryan, S. (2005). Ryan’s occupational therapy: Assistant, principles,

practice issues and techniques (4th ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Spainhower, T. A. (2008). A descriptive study describing the emotional intelligence

domains and associated competencies as perceived by elementary school

principals in high-performing and low-performing Title I schools. (Doctoral

dissertation, University of La Verne., United States—California). Retrieved June

2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT 3351127)

Spencer, L., & Spencer, S. (1993). Competence at work. New York: Wiley.

Stewart, G. L. (2008). The relationship of emotional intelligence to job satisfaction and


125

organization commitment. (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University, United

States—Virginia). Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ProQuest Theses and

Dissertations database. (AAT 3319386)

Stubbs, E. C. (2005) Emotional intelligence competencies in team and team leader: A

multi-level examination of the impact of emotional intelligence on group

performance. (Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, United

States—Ohio). Retrieved July 30, 2008, from http://www.ohiolink.edu /etd/send-

pdf.cgi?acc_num=case1094241887

Stewart, G. L. (2008). The relationship of emotional intelligence to job satisfaction and

organization commitment. (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University, United

States—Virginia), Retrieved on June 2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and

Dissertations database. (AAT 3319386)

Sy, T., Tram, S., & O’Hara, L. A. (2006). Relation of employee and manager emotional

intelligence to job satisfaction and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior,

68(3), 461-473. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from ProQuest database.

Talarico, J., Metro, D., Patel, R., Carney, P., & Wetmore, A. (2008). Emotional

intelligence and its correlation to performance as a resident: A preliminary study.

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, 20(2), 84-89. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from

EBSCOhost database.

TalentSmart. (2010). Emotional intelligence appraisal. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from

http://www.talentsmart.com/

Teehan, R. E. (2006). The relationship between emotional intelligence, sense of humor,

and job satisfaction in masters of business students at a Midwestern university.


126

(Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, United States—Minnesota). Retrieved

September 13, 2010, from ProQuest Theses and Dissertations database. (AAT

3215971)

Tharenou, P. (1993). A test of reciprocal causality for absenteeism: Summary. Journal of

Organizational Behavior, 14(3), 269-287. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from

ProQuest database.

Thomas, M. (2006). Management: A profession in theory. Management Decision, 44(3),

309-315. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from Business Source Complete database.

Van Rooy, D. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (2004). Emotional intelligence: A meta-analytic

investigation of predictive validity and nomological net. Journal of Vocational

Behavior, 65(1), 71-95. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from EBSCOhost database.

Waters, J. (n.d.). Correlational research. Programs and courses. Retrieved September 12,

2010, from http://www.capilanou.ca/programs/psychology/students/research

/correlation.html

Wechsler, D. (1943). Non-intellective factors in general intelligence. Psychological

Bulletin, 38(1), 101-103. Retrieved June 24, 2008, from EBSCOhost database.

Weisinger, H. (1998). Emotional intelligence at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Wietzel, R. J. (2009). Examining factors that motivate workers and promote retention in

government service. (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University, United

States—Arizona). Retrieved on June 2, 2009, from ProQuest Theses and

Dissertations database. (AAT 3351840)

Wolff, S. B. (2005). Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI): Technical Manual.

Philadelphia, PA: Hay Group/McClelland Center for Research and Innovation.


127

Retrieved from http://www.eiconsortium.org/pdf/ECI_2_0_Technical

_Manual_v2.pdf

Wong, C-S., Wong, P-M., & Peng, K. Z. (2010). Effect of middle-level leader and

teacher emotional intelligence on school teachers’ job satisfaction: The case of

Hong Kong. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(1), 59-

70. Retrieved September 13, 2010, from ProQuest database.

Zeffane, R. (1993). Uncertainty, participation and alienation: Lessons for workplace

restructuring. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 13(5), 22-52.

Retrieved June 24, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Complete database.

Zeffane, R. (1994). Job satisfaction and work redesign: Findings from Australia

International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 35(1/2), 137-141. Retrieved

June 24, 2008, from Academic Search Complete database.


128

APPENDIX A: LETTER OF INTRODUCTION

Dear Participant,

I am inviting you participate in an anonymous research project, as part of my degree

requirements, to evaluate the impact of emotional intelligence on job satisfaction. Along

with this letter is a survey questionnaire that asks a variety of questions concerning your

thoughts and feelings in relation to yourself, your work, and your interaction with others

in your workplace. I am asking you to look over the questionnaire, if you choose to

participate, complete it, and send it back to me. It will take you a maximum of 25 minutes

to complete the questionnaires.

Through your participation to this research project, I expect to understand the relationship

between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction. I trust that the results of the survey

be relevant to develop a management system that improves employees’ performance in a

changing environment and I expect to share my results with you after they are published.

To be eligible to participate in this study, you must be employed full-time by Retailer and

Manufacturer, Inc., and be at least 18 years of age. You will be required to sign an

Informed Consent Agreement Form prior to receiving the survey packets.

There are no risks to you or to your privacy if you decide to join my research project by

filling out this survey. But if you choose not to participate, that is fine. Even if you decide

not to respond, I would be very happy to share my results with you if you are interested.
129

To receive a copy of my results call me at 732-803-3983. If you have any questions or

concerns about completing the questionnaire or about participating in this study, you may

contact me at 732-803-3983.

Thank you in advance for your participation

Sincerely,

Kokou Agbolou

Kokou1@verizon.net

Kokou01@Gmail.com
130

APPENDIX B: INFORMED CONSENT AGREEMENT

Introduction:

I, ______________________, a doctoral student at the University of Phoenix, have been

granted permission by the executive office to conduct a research study at your facility on

how employees' Emotional intelligence awareness may contribute to increasing their job

satisfaction in a changing environment, thereby increasing their performance. To be

eligible to participate in this study, participants must be employed full-time by Retailer

and manufacturer Inc., be at least 18 years of age, and sign the following informed

consent agreement.

Participant:

I, ____________________________, employee of Retailer & Manufacturing, Inc., have

volunteered to participate in this research study. My participation or non-participation in

this study is strictly voluntary and be kept confidential. I understand the following

conditions:

1. I may refuse to participate or withdraw from the study at any time without

consequences.

2. I have the right to be informed of the nature and purpose of the study, which is to

evaluate the relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction in a

changing environment.

3. Any records related to the study and the list of participants be kept confidential in a

secure location at the primary researcher’s home for three years. These records and any
131

related sensitive documentation be shredded and discarded by the primary researcher

after the archival period 4. Personal anonymity is guaranteed and the researcher took all

the steps to protect my privacy and maintain confidentiality of the information acquired

from my participation.

5. Results and data of the study may be published and used to enhance organization

performance.

6. I have the right to be informed of all implications of this study, and the researcher

provided me with contact information in the case I may have other questions or need

further information related to the study.

There are no other written or verbal concurrences related to this research study beyond

those articulated in this consent and confidentiality form.

I acknowledge that I understand the nature of the study, any potential risks to me as a

participant, and the means by which my identity be kept confidential. My signature below

indicates that I am over the age of 18 and that I give my permission to voluntarily serve

as a participant in the study.

Printed Name of the participant: ____________________________________________

Signature of the participant: _____________________________ Date: _____________

Signature of the researcher: _____________________________ Date:__ ___________


132

APPENDIX C: PERMISSION TO USE MSQ TEST


133

APPENDIX D: COPYRIGHT PERMISSION LETTER


134

APPENDIX E: DOCUMENTATION

Table: E

Current Dissertations and Peer-Reviewed Journals From 2003-2009

Author # of
Date Title Information
Type pp

2009 Johnson, A study of benefits The mission of the study was to 112

S. K satisfaction among Florida's determine if there was a

protective correlation between satisfaction

Dissert service employees. Doctoral with the costs of employee

dissertation benefits and overall job

satisfaction in Florida's public

safety sector

2009 Wietzel, Examining factors The applied dissertation is an 311

R. J. that motivate workers investigative, quantitative study

and promote retention to determine the optimal

in government service approach federal executives

Dissert should follow to motivate

workers toward achieving

optimum performance and

meeting organizational goals.

Table continued
135

Author # of
Date Title Information
Type pp

Ngwenya- Organizational learning: An The study examined the 139

2009 Scoburgh, exploration of the influence learning capabilities and factors

L of capabilities and factors to assess how they influenced

the learning capability of

organizations to facilitate

Dissert organizational learning and

how they impacted

performance

2009 Howard, Emotional intelligence as This quantitative, 139

M. C a predictor of job descriptive, correlational

satisfaction, organiza- study investigated the

tional commitment, relationships between

Dissert and occupational emotional intelligence,

commitment among organizational and

human service workers occupational commitment,

and job satisfaction among

human service workers

Table continued
136

Author # of
Date Title Information
Type pp

2009 Amram, The contribution of emotional This research investigated 168

J. Y and spiritual intelligences to contributions of emotional and

effective business leadership spiritual intelligences to

Dissert effective leadership. Participants

were 42 CEOs & 210 members.

2008 Ozmen, An analytical study of This research examined the 423

A the impact of the perception impacts of transformational and

of leadership styles on job transactional leadership styles

Dissert satisfaction within the on the effectiveness and

Turkish National Police satisfaction levels of individuals

based on the Multifactor and organization.

Leadership Questionnaire

2008 Stewart, The relationship of emotional The aim of this research was to 134

G. L intelligence test the effectiveness of

to job satisfaction emotional intelligence was

Dissert and organization commitment tested among 110 managers and

supervisors from the food

service industry.

Table continued
137

Author
Date Title Information # of pp
Type

2008 Craig, The relationship between Understanding the 160

J. B the emotional intelligence relationship between the

of the principal and teacher principal's emotional

Dissert job satisfaction intelligence and teacher

job satisfaction is the main

focus of this exploratory

study

2008 Spainhowe A descriptive study describe- The purpose of this study 225

R. T ing the emotional intelli- was to compare the

gence domains and associ- emotional profiles of

Dissert ated competencies as elementary school principals

perceived by elementary in high performing and low

school principals performing schools.

in high-performing and low-

performing Title I schools

Table continued
138

Date Author Title Information #

Type of

pp

2008 Bandelli, Facilitating The current research used 45

A. C. communication and the model and defined the

effective interpersonal competency areas, designed

Dissert relationships at work: A a socio-affective

theoretical model of competence situational

socio-affective judgment test (SAC-SJT),

competence identified the variables that

were related and unrelated to

the construct, and provided

initial evidence in support of

the criterion-related validity

of the socioaffective

competence framework.

Johnson, .An exploratory Study A quantitative study to 115

L. R. of servant leadership, determine the relationship

Dissert emotional intelligence, between the three variables

and job satisfaction in the aerospace industry.

among high-tech No relationship was found

employees. Between EI and satisfaction

Table continued
139

Date Author Title Information # of pp.

Type

2008 Bradshaw, Exploring the relationship This study investigated 266

F. B. between emotional intel- the relationship

ligence and academic between emotional

Dissert achievement in African intelligence factors and

American female college academic achievement

students in academically

successful African

American female

college students

2008 Robitaille, C. Emotional intelligence and This study is intended 140

A. teachers: An exploratory to extend the current

study of differences body of research on

Dissert between general and emotional intelligence

special education teachers by exploring the

relationship between

emotional intelligence,

teacher effectiveness

and teacher

certification.

Table continued
140

Date Author Title Information # of pp

Type

2008 Hanna, Emotional intelligence: The current study 140

M. E. Comparisons of criterion- aimed to provide a

related validity across clearer under-standing

Dissert conceptual and method- of the construct and

logical variants of how to best measure

measurement emotional intelligence

2008 Elias, M. J., Dosage Effects of a Preventive The purpose of the 21

& Rosenblatt, Social-Emotional Learning study was to evaluate if

J. J. Intervention on Achievement children exposed to

Loss Associated with Middle quality implementation

Scholarly School Transition of a preventive, school-

Journal based social-emotional

intervention experience

fewer normative

academic declines

associated with middle

school transition

Table continued
141

Author
Date Title Information # of pp
Type

2008 Crump, Exploratory study of retention Exploratory study of 127

L. V. and emotional intelligence in retention and emotional

public health: The case of the intelligence in public health:

Dissert Coastal Health District, GA The case of the Coastal

Health District, GA.

2007 Lugo, An examination of cultural This study examined the 131

M. V. and emotional intelligences strength and direction of

in the development of global relationships between the self

Dissert transformational leadership and social dimensions of both

skills. emotional and cultural

intelligences and

transformational leadership

skills.

2007 McClellan, A correlational analysis of the The purpose of this study was 269

J. L. relationship between to explore the potential

psychological hardiness and relationship between

Dissert servant leadership among psychological hardiness and

leaders in higher education servant leadership amidst

stress.

Table continued
142

Author
Date Title Information # of pp
Type

2007 Millet, An examination of trait The study investigated the 225

Tal emotional intelligence relationship between

factors: Their relationship emotional intelligence and

Dissert to job satisfaction among job satisfaction among police

police officers. officers.

2007 Ajay Interplay among The paper seeks to high-light 20

Goyal, innovativeness, cognitive the key value changes in the

K. B. intelligence, emotional current economy, which is

intelligence and social shifting towards intangible

Scholarly capital of work teams assets such as innovativeness,

Journal cognitive intelligence,

emotional intelligence, social

capital, and also a shift from

individual to team working.

Table continued
143

Author Title Information # of pp

Date Type

2007 Young- The effects of emotionally 2

Ritchie, C., intelligent leadership behavior

Laschinger, among emergency staff nurses'

H.K.S., & workplace empowerment and

Wong, C. organizational commitment

Scholarly

Journal

2007 Bohrer, V. A study of the relationships 109

between leader emotional

Dissert intelligence (EI) ability and

demographic, performance, job

satisfaction measures, and

MBTI type in the United States

(U.S.) intelligence community

2007 Gasiorow- A study of project managers' 182

ska, G. M. most dominant emotional

Dissert intelligence abilities and skills

Table continued
144

Author Title Information # of

Date Type pp

2007 Sims- Emotional intelligence and 113

Vanzant, leadership practices among

C. human service program

Dissert managers

2006 Harrison, A descriptive study The purpose of this study 301

S. J describing the was to identify and

Dissert emotional intelligence describe the emotional

abilities of intelligence abilities of

superintendents and superintendents who were

identifying the personal identified as having high

and professional emotional intelligence

strategies they utilize to based on the Mayer-

develop and maintain Salovey-Caruso Emotional

high levels of emotional Intelligence Test

intelligence (MSCEIT) (Mayer,

Salovey, Caruso 2002).

Table continued
145

Author Title Information # of

Date Type pp

2006 Johnson- A qualitative study of The purpose of this study was 276

Huff, D. the perceptions held by to identify the challenges new

first-year elementary leaders experience transition-

Dissert principals regarding the ing to the role of elementary

transition to principal, the strategies used

administrator to meet those challenges, and

their effectiveness.

2006 Puschak, The interpersonal side This quantitative research 234

B. A. of coaching: Exploring study utilized a 360-degree

emotional competencies assessment approach to

Dissert and coach perspectives measure coaches' emotional

in the workplace competence.

2006 Rozell, E.J. Emotional intelligence In the current study, the 11

Pettijohn, and dispositional constructs of emotional

C. E., & affectivity as predictors intelligence and dispositional

Parker, R.S. of performance in affectivity were hypothesized

Scholarly salespeople as being positively related to

Journal sales force performance.

Table continued
146

Author Title Information # of

Date Type pp

2006 Muhammad, The relationship between The purpose of the study was 73

Dawn EI and job satisfaction: to determine whether a

Testing the claim that EI relationship existed between

Dissert quotient predicts level of an individual's emotional

job satisfaction. intelligence quotient and his

or her level of job

satisfaction.

2005 Brown, K. Relationship between The study examined the 298

emotional intelligence of correlation between

Dissert leaders and motivational emotional intelligence of

behavior of employees leaders and the motivation of

employees

2004 Poon, Career commitment and The study examined the 17

J. M. career success: moderating effect of

Moderating role of emotional perception on the

Scholarly emotion perception relationship between career

Journal commitment and career

success.

Table continued
147

Author Title Information # of

Date Type pp

2003 Carmeli, The relationship between The study empirically 26

Abraham emotional intelligence and examined the extent to

work attitudes, behavior and which senior managers with

Scholarly outcomes: An examination a high emotional

Journal among senior managers intelligence of the public

sector organizations

develop positive work

attitude

2003 Busso, L. The Relationship between EI The study focused on the 81

and contextual performance relationship between EI and

Dissert as influenced by job contextual performance,

satisfaction and locus of and the influence of job

control orientation. satisfaction and external

locus of control orientation

on this relationship.
148

APPENDIX F: JOB SATISFACTION SCORES AND ECI SCORES

Table F

General Job Satisfaction Scores and Average Combined Self and Non-Self ECI Scores

MSQ Average Combined Self & All non-Self Assessment Scores ECI

Self-A Self-Management Social-A Relationship-Management


Emotional Self-Awareness

Organizational Awareness
Achievement Orientation

Inspirational Leadership
Emotional Self-Control

Conflict Management
General satisfaction

Coach and mentor


Participant

Positive Outlook
Adaptability

teamwork
Influence
Empathy
No Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12

1 95 3.25 3.58 3.75 3.58 4.08 3.75 3.67 3.67 3.00 3.25 3.58 4.50

2 34 3.33 3.67 3.00 3.83 4.00 3.67 3.58 2.92 2.67 1.92 3.08 3.92

3 78 2.92 3.42 3.00 3.25 3.58 2.83 3.17 3.08 2.17 2.92 3.00 3.00

4 62 3.75 4.00 3.92 3.67 3.75 3.58 4.25 3.92 3.25 3.33 3.67 4.17

5 74 2.92 4.33 4.17 4.33 4.25 3.75 3.92 4.00 3.33 3.50 4.00 4.50

Table continued
149

No Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12

6 71 2.83 3.83 3.75 4.08 3.67 3.25 3.42 3.17 2.25 2.58 2.92 3.83

7 53 3.17 3.00 3.58 3.67 3.83 3.67 3.92 3.25 3.00 3.08 3.08 3.92

8 55 3.25 4.17 3.92 3.92 4.25 3.92 3.92 3.92 3.50 3.67 3.92 4.17

9 95 3.42 3.75 3.92 4.08 3.92 3.58 3.25 3.42 2.67 3.42 3.17 4.25

10 45 4.00 4.50 4.33 3.83 4.42 4.08 4.00 4.33 3.75 3.92 4.08 4.42

11 79 3.42 3.67 3.50 3.75 3.75 3.83 3.75 3.42 2.67 2.92 3.17 4.00

12 57 3.33 4.00 4.08 4.08 3.83 3.83 3.25 3.42 3.00 3.00 3.25 3.58

13 31 3.00 3.42 4.08 4.00 4.17 3.92 3.67 3.50 3.25 2.92 4.00 4.08

14 62 3.67 4.08 3.83 4.08 4.00 3.92 3.83 3.83 3.17 3.25 3.83 4.08

15 59 3.33 3.83 3.58 3.50 3.92 3.33 3.50 3.50 3.58 3.67 3.33 3.83

16 45 3.17 3.92 3.83 3.75 3.08 3.67 3.33 3.08 3.25 3.00 3.25 4.00

17 81 3.42 4.33 4.17 4.17 4.25 3.75 4.00 3.75 2.92 3.67 3.92 4.08

18 55 3.58 4.00 4.08 4.00 4.08 3.67 3.58 3.58 3.33 3.33 3.67 4.33

Table continued
150

No. Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12

19 67 3.50 4.08 4.17 4.17 3.75 4.00 3.67 4.00 3.25 3.67 4.00 4.25

20 70 3.33 3.83 3.58 3.50 3.42 3.50 3.67 3.58 3.17 3.58 3.33 3.92

21 72 3.83 4.00 4.17 3.92 4.00 3.92 4.33 3.75 3.75 3.67 3.83 4.50

22 84 3.58 4.25 3.92 3.83 3.83 3.67 3.83 3.75 3.08 3.67 3.67 4.00

23 67 3.75 4.08 4.17 4.33 4.17 3.83 4.25 3.58 3.08 3.33 3.67 4.25

24 62 3.17 3.50 3.75 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.83 3.67 2.83 3.00 3.08 4.00

25 55 2.67 3.92 3.25 3.33 3.42 3.25 3.25 3.00 2.58 2.50 3.17 4.00

26 70 3.75 4.33 4.08 3.92 4.00 3.92 4.08 4.08 3.17 3.75 3.83 4.00

27 87 3.17 3.67 3.50 4.00 3.75 3.50 3.17 3.25 2.33 2.75 3.08 3.92

28 54 3.75 4.42 4.08 4.50 3.92 3.92 4.42 4.25 3.83 3.58 4.17 4.58

29 69 3.50 3.67 3.83 3.50 3.67 3.75 3.50 3.67 3.00 2.75 3.17 4.00

30 58 3.25 3.83 3.83 3.67 4.00 3.58 3.83 3.42 2.08 3.33 3.50 3.58

31 76 4.17 4.33 4.33 4.17 4.42 4.08 4.25 3.83 3.58 3.67 4.08 4.25

Table continued
151

No. Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12

32 35 3.67 3.67 3.75 3.83 4.33 4.08 4.17 4.17 3.25 3.50 3.50 4.17

33 89 3.67 4.50 4.00 4.58 4.08 3.75 4.33 3.83 4.42 3.92 4.00 4.58

35 95 3.50 3.33 3.75 3.75 4.08 3.75 3.67 3.75 3.00 3.33 3.50 4.42

36 34 3.25 4.08 3.25 4.08 4.08 3.67 3.67 2.92 2.33 2.00 3.00 4.00

37 78 3.17 3.67 2.75 3.08 3.50 3.08 3.33 3.08 2.42 2.75 3.08 3.08

38 62 3.67 4.00 4.00 3.67 3.75 3.33 4.08 3.92 3.17 3.33 3.67 4.17

39 74 2.92 4.08 4.08 4.33 4.08 3.67 3.92 4.08 3.17 3.50 3.92 4.50

40 82 4.00 4.08 4.17 4.08 4.33 3.67 4.42 4.25 3.50 3.92 4.17 4.50

41 69 2.67 3.67 3.67 4.00 3.50 3.17 3.33 3.17 2.17 2.67 2.83 4.00

42 53 3.25 3.17 3.67 3.67 3.83 3.75 3.92 3.25 3.00 3.00 3.08 3.75

43 55 3.25 4.17 3.83 3.92 4.17 3.92 3.92 3.92 3.50 3.58 3.92 4.17

44 95 3.42 3.75 4.00 4.08 3.92 3.58 3.25 3.42 2.67 3.42 3.17 4.33

45 45 4.00 4.50 4.33 3.83 4.42 4.00 4.00 4.25 3.75 3.92 3.92 4.42

Table continued
152

No. Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12

46 79 3.33 3.75 3.67 3.75 3.75 3.83 3.67 3.08 2.67 2.92 3.17 4.00

47 65 3.58 3.75 3.75 4.00 3.50 3.83 3.92 4.00 3.67 3.58 3.75 4.08

48 65 3.67 3.75 3.67 4.00 3.58 3.67 3.92 4.17 3.67 3.75 3.92 4.08

49 58 3.58 3.83 4.08 4.00 3.92 3.92 3.75 4.00 3.08 3.67 3.92 4.17

50 58 3.58 3.83 4.08 4.00 3.92 3.92 3.75 4.00 3.08 3.67 3.92 4.17

51 67 3.75 3.58 3.75 4.17 3.92 3.75 4.08 3.75 3.17 3.00 3.67 3.92

52 67 3.75 3.58 3.75 4.17 3.92 3.75 4.08 3.75 3.17 2.92 3.67 3.92

53 82 3.92 4.08 4.17 4.08 4.33 3.67 4.42 4.25 3.50 3.92 4.17 4.42

54 87 3.42 3.92 4.00 3.67 4.08 3.83 4.00 3.83 3.67 3.50 4.17 4.42

55 97 4.00 4.33 4.25 3.83 4.17 4.08 4.42 4.50 3.58 3.92 4.33 4.33

56 87 3.50 4.00 3.83 3.75 4.08 3.75 4.00 3.75 3.33 3.67 4.08 4.08

57 97 3.67 4.08 4.33 4.33 4.42 4.08 4.50 4.50 3.58 3.75 4.33 4.33

58 88 4.00 4.33 4.08 3.92 4.25 4.08 4.25 4.08 3.25 3.67 4.08 4.50

Table continued
153

No. Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12

59 31 3.17 3.50 4.08 3.92 4.17 3.92 3.83 3.58 3.25 2.83 4.00 4.08

60 69 3.33 3.58 3.75 3.58 3.75 3.67 3.42 3.50 2.58 2.58 3.17 3.75

61 87 3.17 3.67 3.67 4.00 3.75 3.50 3.17 3.25 2.33 2.75 3.08 4.00

62 67 3.17 3.67 3.67 3.83 3.92 3.50 3.58 3.42 2.33 3.00 3.08 3.83

63 65 3.92 4.08 4.25 4.17 3.92 4.00 4.25 4.00 3.42 3.50 3.92 4.50

64 35 3.50 3.67 3.75 3.83 4.33 3.83 4.00 4.00 2.83 3.33 3.33 4.17

65 58 3.33 4.25 3.92 4.17 4.00 3.67 3.58 3.42 3.00 2.92 3.25 4.00

66 63 3.75 4.08 3.83 4.08 4.00 3.92 3.75 3.83 3.17 3.25 3.67 4.08

67 59 3.33 4.00 3.67 3.83 4.00 3.33 3.58 3.58 3.42 3.58 3.58 4.00

68 45 3.25 4.33 4.17 3.83 3.67 4.00 3.75 3.17 3.42 3.08 3.42 4.17

69 81 3.50 4.33 4.08 4.08 4.00 3.58 3.83 3.50 2.75 3.42 3.58 3.92

70 88 4.00 4.42 4.00 3.92 4.33 4.08 4.17 3.83 3.08 3.50 4.00 4.50

71 62 3.50 3.42 3.50 3.33 3.33 3.42 3.50 3.67 2.92 3.58 3.50 3.83

Table continued
154

No. Y X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12

72 67 3.58 4.08 4.25 4.17 3.75 4.00 3.58 4.00 3.25 3.67 4.00 4.25

73 55 4.00 4.33 4.00 4.17 4.08 4.17 4.17 3.92 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.58

75 32 3.58 3.67 3.42 3.00 3.50 3.17 3.58 3.42 2.25 3.33 2.83 3.50

76 77 3.00 3.42 3.50 3.58 3.50 3.25 3.25 3.67 2.08 2.92 3.08 3.83

77 32 3.75 3.83 3.58 3.75 3.58 3.67 3.75 3.67 2.50 3.17 3.17 4.00

78 42 3.83 3.08 3.58 4.50 3.67 3.83 3.75 3.33 2.17 2.83 3.00 3.50

79 58 3.58 4.00 4.25 3.75 3.83 4.00 3.67 3.42 2.25 3.50 3.92 4.58

80 60 4.33 4.42 4.42 4.50 4.50 4.42 4.08 4.25 3.50 4.42 4.25 4.50
155

APPENDIX G: SCATTERGRAMS 1-12

Figure G-1. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by emotional self-awareness.

Figure G-2. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by achievement orientation.


156

Figure G-3. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by adaptability.

Figure G-4. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by emotional self-control


157

Figure G-5. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by positive outlook

Figure G-6. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by empathy


158

Figure G-7. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by organizational awareness

Figure G-8. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by conflict management


159

Figure G-9. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by coach and mentor

Figure G-10. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by influence


160

Figure G-11. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by inspirational leadership

Figure G-12. Scatter plot: General Job Satisfaction by teamwork

S-ar putea să vă placă și