Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PRELIMINARY YEAR
All Rights Reserved.
The Law Students' Union,
Sri Lanka Law College.
Copyright
All material in this publication are protected by copyright, subject to statutory
exceptions. Any unauthorized reproduction of any portion of the material contained
herein for sale or profit, without the written consent of The Law Students' Union,
may invoke inter alia liability for infringement of copyright.
Disclaimer
This material is intended to be a peripheral supplement for the revision of the
subject, solely to supplement students’ academic needs. They are not a substitute for
the lectures or the knowledge transmitted thereof.
Compiled by
Amanda Abeysinghe
Senali Udugama
Chairman
Imaz Imthiyaz
Secretaries
Dharani Weerasinghe
Savanthi Ponnamperuma
Chirathi Attanayaka
Sachini Wanigasekara
Ahamed Rifkhan
Tharsika Thirukumaranathan
Committee Members
Vijitha Karunatilleke
Malith Pitipanaarachchi
Shahani Mackie
Naadhia Zainudeen
Nilupul Galappaththi
Madushi Wickramasinghe
Dulmini Liyanage
Sasmini Bandara
Nelum Jayasinghe
Arjunkumar Selvarajah
Amanda Abeysinghe
Senali Udugama
Law Students' Union of Sri Lanka
Executive Committee - 2017
Patron
His Lordship the Chief Justice Priyasath Depp
Vice Patron
Mrs. Indira Samarasinghe, P.C.
President
Dhanujaya Samarasinghe
Vice President
Shammas Ghouse
General Secretary
Harshana Jayarathne
Junior Treasurer
Rasika M. Jayasinghe
Education Secretary
Imaz Imthiyaz
Asst. Secretary
Malintha Jayasinghe
Editor
Sachith Ranasinghe
Business Manager
Induri Perera
Sports Secretary
Anthony Gunawaradana
Asst. Editor
Senali Udugama
1. Sources of Law……………………………………….………….……………….. 1
6. Superior Courts……..……………………….…………………………………… 17
1. SOURCES OF LAW
‘Sources of Law’, as a concept, has a two-fold meaning as far as generality and technicality
are concerned. In general, it means the origins of law and as to how certain laws have been
originated in the first place. However, in a broader technical sense, it refers to the sovereign
or the state from which the law derives its force and/or validity. This technical sense again is
two-fold as in a Civil Law system, only the appropriate code would matter whereas in a
Common Law system, following sources would matter. (Hierarchically ordered)
1. Legislation (Primary and Secondary)
2. Judicial Precedent
3. Local Customs
4. Equity
5. Religion
Despite the Sri Lankan Legal System being a combination of the Civil Law and Common Law
systems, Sri Lankan Courts have predominantly followed the latter. Hence, the
aforementioned sources would be mainly applicable in the local context. (However, the latter
two sources and sources of special laws such as Tesawalamai, Muslim and Kandyan laws
have largely been modified by Legislation and Judicial Precedent.)
However it’s worth noting that in the international context, following sources would deem
applicable. [Statutes of International Court of Justice – Article 38(1)]
1. International Conventions
2. Customary norms of international Law
3. General Principles recognized by nations
4. Secondary sources such as Equity, Opinion of jurists and etc.
(1) Acts of the UK Parliament (Acts passed by the UK legislature in the period between
1796 – 1947)
a. UK Acts extending to all colonies – All are now repealed (Examples: Air
Navigation Act (1920), Copyrights Act (1911), etc)
b. UK Acts directed to Ceylon only – Only one Act, The Ceylon Independence
Act (1947) which was then constitution, repealed by 1972 and 1978
constitutions.
In accordance with Campbell v Hill judgment, the Royal prerogative could legislate for
colonies captured, ceded or settled and this included the maritime provinces of Ceylon in 1801
and the entire country in 1815 following the Kandyan convention. The British crown retained
legislative power through prerogative.
Examples:
• Colonial constitutions such as Colebrook-Cameron and Donomorough were issued as
Orders-in-Council.
• Charters under Great Seal and Letters of Patent & Royal Instructions were issued by
Governors or Governor-Generals. (As a practice of Prerogative instruments)
• Ibra-Lebbe V Queen (65 NLR 433), the Privy Council’s opinion is also converted into
an Order in Council.
** It was held by Privy Council, even in thee Post-independent Ceylon/Sri Lanka, the British
crown would have the Judiciary Power vested upon them in contrast to the Legislative and
Executive powers that were taken away from them through the Independent Constitution.
Examples:
• Medical Act of 1886 which conferred on the Privy Council authority to enroll medical
graduates in the list of practitioners. Order in Council of 27th Dec 1887 extended the
legislation to Ceylon
• Some Acts passed by the UK Parliament that are not applicable to Ceylon unless
otherwise stated/extended by an Order in Council
**However, this type of legislation ceased to exist in the Post Independent Ceylon
A body other than the Supreme Legislature (The Parliament) is authorized to legislate in
pursuance of an existing statute or Primary legislation.
• Delegated Legislation is also published in Government Gazette. There are six volumes
series of such Gazettes published in 1956.
1656 – 1796 Placaats (Not included in legislative enactments of Ceylon and those who invoke
must prove it has been introduced to Ceylon; Karonchihamy V Angohamy 8 NLR 1)
Judicial Decisions are two fold in Common Law and Civil Law. Civil Law is primarily
concerned with the persuasive authority and a series of previous judgments. (Thus treaties of
classical jurists are authoritative than judicial decisions)
However, since the local context is concerned with Common Law, it is important to take a
look at the basic principle of judicial precedent the Common Law is concerned with, Stare
decisis (Single binding precedent)
• However, important to note that only the RATIO DECIDENDI would bind the
judgment and not every part of the authoritative judgment.
• The general presumptions of DBP are (i) Existence of a hierarchy of courts (ii) clear
law reporting (iii) the Rule of Law
• Rule of law, expressly of implicitly treated by the judge as a necessary link for
the decision (Rupert Cross)
• The Combination of the following stages (i) When the applicable law is used
(ii) On material facts (iii) Decision is arrived at (Goodheart)
Example: The conviction of murder is in respect to the (1) applicable law of section 294
of the Penal Code, (2) assuming there are three material facts named X,Y,Z and on the
application of law to the material facts, the decision arrived at (3) is that the Court
found the accused guilty of the charges.
Then, a future/lower court when controneted with (1) and (2) must garner a similar
judgment of similar charges.
To simply put, it refers to the non-binding sections of the judgment. In a broader sense it
means,
• A device used by the lower courts to free itself from the binding nature of the
judicial authority.
• However, in doing so, the lower court accepts the ration but states that in the
instant case Material Facts are different.
There are three forms of distinguishing, as stated in the Fibrosa Case 6 Modern LR 48
(i) Distinction of Facts
(ii) The Relegation of objectionable judicial opinions to the position of obiter
(iii) When the same decision is arrived at for different reasons, distinguishing
enables the lower court to make its own opinion.
04) Overruling:
This device is for the later superior court that it may overrule the lower court decision. This
has a retrospective effect except for decisions which are res judica.
(i) When Overruling effects rights and duties of parties in a substantial number of
cases decided in the past, the superior courts will not overrule (Unless the
authority is blatantly erroneous)
(ii) Long unchallenged decisions will be overruled when they appear manifestly
unjust
(iii) When a particular judicial authority has been considered weak and subject to
justifiable criticism
(iv) Generally overruling operates Prospectively and not retrospectively
(v) In Criminal matters, binding is less than in Civil matters (Bandahamy V
Senannayake 62 NLR 31)
• Refusal to follow leaves two equally powerful authorities for later lower courts.
If the decision Y (1980 of SC) has overruled decision X (1970 of SC) and decision
Z (CA in 1990) was given under the overruled decision of 1970 SC, then the
High Court today is bound by neither.
This literally means mistake. Under this, lower courts are not bound by the
predecessor authority. Per incuriam refers to a judgment of a court which has
been decided without reference to a statutory provision or earlier judgment
which would have been relevant.
If decision Z can be arrived at by two legal principles (X&Y) and the judgment
expressly states only X but not Y, then Y cannot be cited as authority for the
decision Z. (Therefore, Rule Y has passed off ‘Sub Silentio’) Example: Sameed V
Segutamby 25 NLR 481
• In General Perspective
• From International Law point of view
• As local Customs
i) Customs Generally;
Customs are contemporary with any organized community. That too is again two-folding.
• Customs which are legally binding (“It is unwritten right brought in gradually by the
usage of those who practice it and having strength of law” – Commentary on the
Pandects) Examples: Teswalamai, Muslim Law and other primitive laws.
According to the Statute of the International Court of Justice, Customs are listed second as a
mean of (Source) settling disputes. [Article 38 (1) ]
** It is important to note that although customs are listed second, they hae more persvasive
value than conventions. These customary norms are made of two parts, namely;
Local customs are usages in a particular locality (Village, Trade Group or a Community; In
SL, Customs among Fishermen, Tamils of the North and Kandyan can be categorized in this
aspect)
General Customs are not considered as customs, since any law that apply to all Sri Lankans
must be found either in Statute or Roman Dutch Law.
In a decided case Muttalibu V Hameed 1950 (52 NLR 97), the tests needed to establish a local
custom are neatly listed. Hence, it requires a customs to be of Usage besides being (i)
Notorious (ii) Certain (iii) Reasonable and (iv) Must not offend against the intention of any
legislative enactment (ibid.s.52, p.39)
**No usage however extensive will be allowed to prevail if it’s directly opposed to positive law.
The Test of Antiquity was understood in English Law on an arbitrary date in 1189 AD and
was later defined as ‘reasonably ancient’. However, in Roman Dutch Law, antiquity means
‘beyond the memory of living man’ (Chinappa V Kanakka 13 NLR 157)
• However, in Roman Dutch Law, even a statute could be made obsolete by a later
custom. [According to the South African case Seaville V Colley (1891) 9 SC 39 which
was later applied and accepted in Kandar V Sinnachipillai 36 NLR 362]
• Sinhala Law-
Included Sinhalese customs , Buddhist Canonical teachings, Hindu laws and
customs of the Mauryan and Sakyan groups.
After arrival of Portuguese this law was divided as Low Country Sinhalese
laws and Kandyan laws.
Wiliiam v Robertson
• Teswalamai
Brought to Ceylon by Tamil immigrants who came from the coasts of Malabar
and Coromandel.
Later turned into the legal system by which the tamils of Northern kingdom
(North and East of Ceylon) were being governed by.
• Muslim law
Muslim traders who came to Ceylon adopted the Muslim law which was
existing world wide to govern their dispute in Ceylon.
Reid v AG
Abeysundera v Abeysundera
Proclamation 1815.
Ensured the continuity for laws and institutions that existed in the Kandyan provinces and
the rights and privileges of all the inhabitants of the Kandyan provinces subject to the night
of the British Sovereign to introduce change.
Proclamation of 1815-Article 4 &8 –Gives assurance to continue the existing laws and
institutions.
Article 4 –Guarantee to all classes of people within the Kandyan Provinces to continue their
Civil Rights and immunities, according to the laws, institutions and customs established and
in force amongst them.
Article 8 –The administration of Civil and Criminal justice, over the Kandyan inhabitants of
the said province is to be exercised according to established forms and by the ordinary
authorities subject to the rights of the government to introduce change.
Article 9 –Provisions regarding administration of evil and criminal justice to all other persons
civil or military residing in or resorting to these provinces, not being Kandyans.
Intended to exclude Europeans as well as local population that could migrate to Kandyan
provinces from the application of Kandyan Law and tribunals.
Proclamation of 31st May 1816–This did not abrogate or repeal the proclamation of 1815, it
only made a clarification of the legal position.
The proclamation of 1816 too attempted to limit the Kandyan Law only to the inhabitants of
the Kandyan provinces. (Attempted to exclude persons coming into the newly acquired
territory from the application of the indigenous Kandyan law).
The Ordinance No.5 of 1852 –Imposed restrictions on the operation of Kandyan Law.
The preamble declared;
That its purpose was to introduce into Ceylon the Law of England in Certain Matters and to
restrict the operation of the Kandyan law.
Section 5 –When there is a gap in the Kandyan Law, the law of Maritime Provinces should be
used to fill the gap.
Section 7 –Kandyan Provinces be governed by the criminal law of the maritime province.
Section 8 –European, burghers were excluded from the Kandyan law on marriage and
inheritance by this ordinance.
Section 9 – Muslims in the Kandyan Province were excluded from the application of Kandyan
Law –The Mohammadan Code Should apply.
Case Law
Mongee v. Siarpaye– Held; Kandyan law is a territorial law.
The Sinhalese Kings applied the kandyan law to all their subjects irrespective of question as
to whether they were Kandyan or not.
They also applied the Kandyan law to all lands situated within the Kandyan territory
This the Kandyan Law was applicable to Tamil inhabitants within the Kandyan territory.
Kershaw v. Nicoll
Wife of a sootsman domiciled in the kandyan Province and that basis she acquired the status
of a wife governed by Kandyan law.
Authority; to prove that the Kandyan law was applied to all inhabitants of the province as a
territorial law irrespective of the Nationality of the inhabitants.
Williams v. Roberton;-Overruled this case
Williams v. Roberton
Kandyan Law should apply only to a kandyans and that others who integrated to the
province after 1815 should be governed by the law of the Maritime Provinces.
Kandyan law was not applicable as a territorial law to all residents in the Kandyan province
but applied only to people who can be called as kandyans who lived in those provinces as at
1815.
1. Gam Sabhawa
Gam sabhawa / village tribunal whose origin dates back to the origin of the village
itself was composed of the village elders.
Dealt with very minor offences such as small debts, minor quarrels, boundary disputes
and thefts.
The procedure for settling disputes basically comprised of the following; admonition,
compromise, and common sense unsullied by legal technicalities and rigid rules of
procedure.
The Gam sabhawa had minor punitive jurisdiction to impose fines but only if the
headman was present.
2. Rata sabhawa
3. Sakki balanda
The extent of the jurisdiction of the various officials depended on their status and comprised
of the following ;
i. Vidanes
ii. Liyanarales/Undirales/Korales
iii. Mohhottales/Archchis
iv. Chiefs
v. Disaves/Adigars
vi. Mahanaduwa
vii. King
v In inflicting punishments, the officials considered the caste and rank of the
wrongdoer.
Vidanes
• Officials with the least judicial power and they possess minor civil and criminal
jurisdiction .
• Their duties were somewhat similar to that of police officers and they had the
authority to levy small fines and inflict corporal punishments on persons of law caste.
Liyanarales/undirales/korales
Had the authority to hear complaints regarding petty thefts and other trivial minor disputes,
limited power in land disputes and also limited power of imposing punishments which was
however slightly wider than vidanes.
Mohottales/Arachchis
• These two classes of officials could grant written decrees known as wattoru after
adjudicating in a land dispute. Had the power to deal with criminal offences as well.
• The Mohottales of the 7 korales / Uva /Sabaragamuwa which were isolated areas had
greater power.
Chiefs
• The lekams /ratemahathmayas and the chief royal officials attached to the king’s court
and household had civil jurisdiction over all persons subject to their orders.
• Their civil jurisdiction was limited only by their inability to adjudicate in some land
cases.
Disaves/Adigars
• They had extensive jurisdiction over all persons within the territory they ruled.
• Adigars were next in line to the king and could take the cognizance of cases civil and
criminal except those concerned with Royal lands and disputes which arose between
members of the Royal court.
Mahanaduwa
• Consists of higher officials and the chiefs (Adigars / disaves) this court originated as
a result of the king referring judicial matters which submitted to him to his chiefs.
• These officials originally acted in an advisory capacity and reported back to the king,
who delivered the verdict. In course of time Mahanaduwa acquired an original
jurisdiction as distinct from it’s earlier function of merely advicing the king.
King
The king was considered as the ultimate judicial authority. He had a wide range of powers
which extended over all matters whereby he exercised both original and appellate
jurisdiction.
He exercised extensive jurisdiction in the following cases,
v Suits arising between any principal servant or chief of his court or where such
a person was a defendant and those relating to Royal lands.
v Suits between priests claiming rights to the incumbency of principal temples.
v Serious crimes - treason / rebellion/ conspiracy against the king or his
family
- All homicides
v Could also try cases submitted to him by his officials or even where a
petitioner approached him individually either directly or through a court of
official.
• Ceylon came under the supervision of Eastern Headquarters i.e. the Dutch East
India Company situated in Batavia, Java.
• This body was in turn governed by the States General which was the governing
organ in the Netherlands
• The courts in Ceylon exercised jurisdiction in the name of the States General of the
Netherlands.
Court Structure
The Landraden
Primary Courts
• The lowest level of court found in Sri Lanka.
• The Primary Court deals with civil actions in which the claim involved is under one
thousand five hundred rupees and criminal proceedings in relation to certain minor
offences laid down by regulation.
• The Primary Court also has the power to enforce by-laws and revenue claims of
local authorities.
• A Primary Court judge should encourage the parties to come to a settlement in any
civil matter before commencing an inquiry.
• Both in civil and criminal matters there is greater emphasis on amicably settling
disputes and grievances in the Primary Court.
Family Courts
• Sole jurisdiction in matrimonial disputes ,actions for divorce, nullity and separation ,
damages for adultery, maintenance and alimony, custody of children, guardianship
adoption etc.
Magistrate ‘sCourts
• The Magistrates’ Court has local jurisdiction in relation to many of the less serious
criminal offences as provided for in the Penal Code and other legislation.
• The Magistrate can issue search warrants and inquire into matters such as sudden
deaths and bodies found where the cause of death is unknown.
• The Magistrate has a host of miscellaneous powers, such as the making of orders for
maintenance and enforcing orders of other tribunals.
• Some offences which is to be tried by the High Court may be preceded by a
preliminary inquiry ( formerly known as “non summary procedure”) which
determines whether there is a prima facie case.
• Any statute can confer on the Magistrate Summary or non summary jurisdiction
District Court
• The District court is the court with original civil jurisdiction, in all matters in which
original jurisdiction has not been vested with any other court.
• A great proportion of the cases which come up before the District Court are to do
with land-partition, rent and ejectment of tenants, declaration of ownership, and
rights of way and other rights over land.
• The variety of land matters in the court is a reflection not only of the value people
place on ownership of property, however small but also of the fact that Sri Lanka is
still largely a rural country.
• The District Court also deals with testamentary, trust, revenue, debt recovery,
wrongful loss caused by negligence, defamation and so on and insolvency matters.
• The District Court is deemed to be the Family Court and in that capacity has
jurisdiction over matrimonial matters such as divorce, over custody and adoption of
children and declaration of legitimacy or illegitimacy.
• DC is Upper guardian of all minors, persons of unsound mind, idiots etc.
6. SUPERIOR COURTS
Supreme Court
• Article 118 –States that; The Supreme Court is the highest and final superior court of
record in the republic.
• Article 125(1)
• It is only the Supreme Court which has the power to determine any question relating
to the interpretation of the constitution.
• Any such question which has arisen in the course of proceedings in any other court
should be referred to the Supreme Court for determination.
Appellate Jurisdiction
• Article 127(1) –states that; the Supreme Court is the Final Court of Civil and Criminal
appellate jurisdiction for the correction of all errors in fact of law, which are
committed by any lower court, tribunal or such institution.
• Article 128(1) – there is a right of appeal to the Supreme Court from any decision of
the Court of Appeal if the Court of Appeal grants permission to appeal or at the
instance of any aggrieved party.
• However there should be a substantial question of law involved.
• Article 128(2) –The Supreme Court can grant special leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court even where refused by the court of appeal. (Matter of public importance).
• It may affirm, reverse or vary any such decision of the Court of Appeal.
• Article 127(2) –Supreme Court may;
• Issue such directions to any court of first instance
• Order a new trial or further hearing of the justice of the case requires
Consultative Jurisdiction
• Article 129(1) –if it appear to the President of the Republic that a question of law or
fact has arisen or is likely to arise which is of public importance he may refer that
question to the Supreme Court for Consideration.
Election Petitions
• Article 130 –Supreme Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate in election petitions with
regard to;
• The election of the president
• Any appeal from the court appeal in an election petition case.
Parliamentary Privileges
• Article 131 –The Supreme Court has jurisdiction in respect of breaches of
Parliamentary Privileges.
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
• Article 138(1) – Court of Appeal has appellate jurisdiction for the correction of any
error in fact or law by any court of first instance, tribunal or other institution.
• Article 141 –Court of appeal can issue orders in the nature of writs of heabeas corpus
to;
§ inquire into and report upon the acts of the alleged imprisonment.
§ Make orders for the interim custody
-Court of Appeal can deal with certain matters in regard to the custody and control of
minor Children.
• Article 142 –Court of Appeal can direct any prisoner detained in any prison;
§ To be brought before a court martial
§ To be removed from custody to another
• Article 143 –Court of Appeal has the power to grand injunctions to prevent any
irredeemable mischief.
• Article 144 –Court of Appeal has the power to try election petitions in respect of the
election to the membership of parliament.
• Sixth Amendment to the Constitution-Conditioned that;
• Court of appeal can;
- Hear trials of persons charged with violations of the territorial integrity of Sri
Lanka
-Impose Punishment on them upon conviction.
• Article 154P(2) –The chief Justice can Nominate from among judges of the high court
of Sri Lanka such number of judges as may be necessary to each Provincial High
Court
§ Every such judge may be transferable by the chief justice.
§ The original criminal jurisdiction of the high court of Sri Lanka in respect of offences
committed within the province.
• Article 154P(4) –Provincial High Court has jurisdiction to issue orders in the nature
of;
• Writ Jurisdiction
o Habeus Corpus in respect of persons illegally detained within the province.
o Writs of Certiorari, prohibition, precedendo, mandamus and qua narrantoagainst
any persons exercising power under;
§ Any law
§ Any statute made by the provincial high Court for that province in respect of
any matter set out in the provincial list.
• Article 154P(5) –Judicial Service Commission can delegate can delegate to the
Provincial High Court the power to inspect and report on the administration of any
court of first instance within the province.
• Section 3 of Act no.19 of 1990 –States that; “A provincial High Court can exercise
appellate jurisdiction in respect of orders made by a labor tribunal within the
province.
• High Court of Provinces (Special Provisions) Act 1996 –Sets out that; A provincial
High Court has the power to hear and determine, Commercial transaction, in which
the amount exceeds 5million rupees (5,000,000LKR).
o Section 5A(1) of the act stipulates that; a provincial High court has appellate
jurisdiction in respect of judgements, decrees and order of any District Court
or Family Court.
3.Labour Tribunals
Ø Industrial Disputes Act 1950 – created Labour Tribunals
Ø Aim at resolution of labour disputes
Ø Hear applications by employees
Ø Commissioner of Labour holds inquiries into industrial disputes aiming to induce
parties to come to amicable settlement.
Ø Minister of Labour may also refer minor industrial disputes to arbitration.
5. Mediation
Ø The Mediation Boards Act no 72 of 1988
Ø The Act establishes Mediation Boards
Ø Exclude legal representation altogether
Ø A large number of disputes handled by the boards relate to community issues.
Influence of English law in SL isn’t as far reaching as in some other British colonies.
In SL, English law relating to certain aspects was selectively incorporated because of the
existence of Roman Dutch law and systems of communal personal law.
By Statutes
Legislative incorporation of English law has been affected in six ways;
By Judicial Activism
Samed v. Segutamby– According to the Proclamation 1799 the Roman-Dutch law is still in
force if not repealed by the local legislature.
Nevertheless English principles formed the basis of judicial decisions.
The amalgamation of English and Roman-Dutch law enriched the legal system.
The judiciary attempted to justify their resort to English Law in many ways.
• Roman-Dutch law does not provide for situation which confronts the courts.
• The rules peculiar to the conditions of life in Holland are not a part of the law
of Sri Lanka.
• Roman-Dutch law is similar to English law.
These tests were merely excuses for ignoring one system and resorting to another.
Thus sometimes the Roman Dutch law was ignored even where;
It did provide for the situation which confronted the court
The rules were not peculiar to Holland.
Roman-Dutch Law was not similar to English Law.
Fernando v. Batsian
There are other methods of judicial incorporation which are more arbitrary.
Held; A Roman-Dutch rule relied upon by a litigant must be applied by the courts during the
Dutch period.
Since the records were in Dutch language this was virtually impossible to prove. In practice
this gave the court unfettered discretion to reject any Roman Dutch-Law and apply English
principles instead.
· Silva v. Balasuriya
English Law has been applied because the Roman-Dutch law was obsolete.
Held; when the dutch law is inconsistent with the established practice of the colony Roman-
dutch law regarded as abrogated by disuse.
A law could be abrogated by contrary customs or by continuous acts of disobedience to law.
Jayawickrama v. Amarasuriya
An attempt to judicially incorporate English Rules relating to consideration was halted.
Held; The English Concept of Consideration was not part of the law of Sri Lanka.
Exception;
The concept of consideration has been introduced in special situations by statute.
Thus consideration is required in contracts which are governed by the Sale of Goods
Ordinance 1896.
1. The Roman-Dutch Law does not provide for the situations which confront the courts;
De Zilva v. Cassim.
2. The rules peculiar to the Conditions of life in Holland are not part of the Law of Sri Lanka;
Ramasamy v. Wright
4. The roman Dutch law should be adapted to suit the circumstances of modern life by
reference of English Authorities
Noordeen v Badourdeen
Dr. Corray is of the view the above tests were often not carefully and seriously considered
and applied and served merely as an excuse for ignoring one system and resorting to another
system.
Different Reasons given by the judges for application of English Law principles in deciding
cases.
Similarly other statutes promulgated by the British Administration in Sri Lanka such as the
Charter of Justice 1801 and 1803 and the Ordiance of 1835 too reflected the approach in
Cambell v Hall.
9. THESAWALAMAI LAW
Thesawalamai law is a system of law applicable to the tamil inhabitants of Jaffna, a translation
would mean “The customs of the land”.
• Migration of Tamils from south India. (From the time of ancient Kings)
o Majority came from the Malabar District of india.
o Others came from Chola and Pandyan
o The mixture of these customs constituted the Thesawalamai law of Sri
Lanka.
o The customs and usages of the Malabar were derived from Muruhakattayam
law –which constitutes the main basis and ground of the Thesawalamai law.
• The Portuguese
o Applied thesawalamai law without attempting to codify it.
• Dutch
o The commander (2wardacoon) emphasized the necessity of codifying the
Thesawalamai.
§ Reason; The Dutch found it difficult to ascertain the principles in this
system
o Governor Simons in 1706 made a code by “collecting and codifying” The
Jaffnapatamancient customs and rules.
o The Original codification was made in Dutch.
o Translated to Tamil by Jan Pirus.
o Applied in resolving civil disputesfrom 1707-1806
o The courts have consistently held, the thesawalamai law applied not only to
tamil inhabitants of Jaffna in 1806 and to their descendants but also to any
Tamils who came and settled down and acquired inhabitation in Jaffna.
o The sole criteria that would be deciding whether a person is governed by
Thesawalami Law or not is whether the Particular tamil person had acquired
an inhabitation in the northern province.
o TharamalingamChetty v. ArunasalamChettiar
§ Held; that a person whose father had come from Ramnad in South
India after 1806 and settled down in Jaffna was governed by
Thesawalamai law.
o King v. Perumal
§ Held; Native of South India living in central Province was not
governed by Thesawalamai because he was not an inhabitant of the
Northern Province.
o S/C emphasized, that in order to be governed by Thesawalamai, a tamil must
have acquired domicile in Ceylon in addition to the inhabitancy in Jafnna
when it said that Thesawalami applies to Tamils with a Ceylon domicile and
Jaffna inhabitancy.
o Spencer v. Rajaratnam
§ Naganathan was the son of tamil parents who were inhabitants of
Jaffna. Naganathan left Jaffna when he was an infant and lived and
died in Colombo. He married a Colombo Tamil lady who had been
living in Colombo. He had visited jaffna four times before he died,
intestate. The court had to decide if he was governed by Thsawalami
or general law.
§ Held; The fact of birth or descent as a tamil inhabitant of Jaffna was
sufficient toprove that a person is governed by Thesawalamai law.
o Savunderanayagam v Sounderanayagam
§ One savu, was born in Jaffna, hus father was a Colombo Chetty who
had lived in Jaffna, but savu who was a lawyer had practiced in
Trinclonoply in South india.
§ Held; He was not by thesawalamai because there was no sufficient
evidence available to prove that save himself was an inhabitant of the
Northern Province.
o All the above cases took the position that the evidence of the person’s family
history and his birth in Jaffna was not adequate to prove inhabitancy and the
persons concerned should have acquired inhabitancy.
• Velupillai v. Sukamipillai
o The word “Inhabitancy” applies to a person who had acquired a permanent
residence in the nature of domicile in Jaffna.
• These cases prove that the relevant person should have acquired a permanent
inhabitancy in the province of Jaffna.
• If he had maintained a permanent home in Jaffna and gave it up at a later stage, it
points to the fact that he has given up inhabitancy in Jaffna and hence is not
governed by Thesavalamai.
But;
• If a person who had a permanent residence in the northern provision lived outside
that province for the purposes of business or employment, the courts have decided
that he has not given up his permanent inhabitance in Jaffna.
o Sivagananalingam v. Sunetheralingam
o A Jaffna man went to Colombo for studies and worked. He married a Tamil
lady in Jaffna. During the 20 years of his married life with his wife he lived in
Colombo and used to go and stay during vacation in the house in Jaffna,
which was a dowry property of his wife. Though he married another woman
after his 1st wife’s death, he continually maintained his relationship with
Jaffna.
o Held; No intention of abandoning the original Jaffna inhabitancy, the
deceased never ceased to be a Jaffna inhabitant.
Marisal v. Savari
• Held; That the Thesawalami law applied to Tamils living in the manner district.
Wellapulla v. Sitambelem
• Held; Thesavalamai law is applicable to tamils living outside the Northern province
of Ceylon. Thesawalami law did not apply to Tamils in Batticalo and Trincomalee
districts.
Fernando v. Proctor
• Held; Tamil Woman descended from Jaffna and a resident of puttlam district was
not governed by the Thesavalamai law, on the basis that she had not permanently
resided in the Northern Province.
• Tesawalamai Code
• Specifically stated that it would apply only to Tamils in the province of Jaffna.
• It did not apply outside the Northern Province and that it did not apply to persons
living outside the Northern Province.
• Tamils outside the Northern Province were governed by General Law.
• The best definition of Thesawalamai is that it is a personal law with a territorial basis
• Tamil person governed by Thesawalami can change his personal law by shifting his
permanent residence from Northern Province to another province.
• When Thesawalami applies to a tamil person residing in the Norther Province, as a
personal law. Its Principles govern inheritance, succession and matrimonial property
rights of spouses irrespective of whether property of that person is situated in the
northern property or any other province.
§ Eg. If a person subject to Thesawalami owns property situated in Colombo or
Baticaloa. The right of succession to this property and the matrimonial rights
of spouses should be determined according to Thesawalamai.
• Seelachy v. VisunathanChetty
§ A father who was subject to thesawalamai had been doing his
business in Colombo. Though he stayed in Colombo for business
purposes his permanent residence was in jaffna where his wife and
• Sivagnanalingam v. Sunetheralingan
§ Thesawalami is the personal law of the Tamil inhabitants of the
Northern Province. It applies to them wherever they are and to their
movable and immovable property, wherever situated in Sri Lanka.
• Manikkarasagar v. Kandasamy
§ Tamil Person Governed by Thesawalamai died intestate. He owned a
house and a car in Colombo.
§ Court applied principles of Thesawalami to determine the intestate
succession rights of the heirs or to whom the property devolved.
• For Certain Purposes the Thesawalamai law applied to all immovable property
within the Northern Province.
• One such right is the Right of Pre-emption.
§ Thambiah defines the right of pre-emption as “the right recognized by
thesavalamai law over immovable property situated in the Northern
Province of Ceylon by which certain classes of persons had the right
to demand the seller to sell to them at a price which only a bona fide
purchaser is prepared to pay for the same, therefore co-owners, co-
heirs and adjacent land owner had a right to demand that an owner
who wished to sell his property makes the 1st offer sale to them at a
competitive price”.
§ This right of pre-emption applied to all land within the Northern
Province. If a land owner sells his land to an outsider violating the
pre-emption rights of Co-owner, co-heirs and adjacent land owners,
they could get the sale invalidated by filling an action in the courts.
§ Suppiah v. Thambiah
Jus gentium
• It concerns with the relationship between the romans and foreigners.
• This is the initial stage of international Rome.
Jus Civile
• It is the law peculiar to the state of Rome, thus it is the law applicable to Romans.
• It refers to the law of particular state of Rome.
• In another sense it refers to the law of Rome, applicable to Roman citizens only.
• Sometimes it also refers to a part of the law based on ancient Roman customs and
statutes particularly The XII Tables.
• In a general sense it’s the law at least originally applicable in Rome to the Roman
Citizens
Jus gentum
• It also has its own different meanings but generally is;
• It’s the law with Universal application and used among all civilized nations or people.
• It was originally applicable to govern the relationship between Roman Citizens and
foreigners.
• Later it was made applicable for Roman citizens.
• As a set of principles that govern the commercial transactions between the roman
citizens and foreigners.
• jusgentumdeveloped into a massive body of law superseding jus civileand became
applicable to both Romans and foreigners.
Status of a Slave
Legal status;
• The slave did not have legal status.
• The slave belonged to the master.
• The slave could be tortured and killed at the discretion of the master
• · However; a slave becomes a free man upon emancipation (liberation) and enjoy status of
a free man.
Property rights;
• The slave could not acquire property
• If he acquires property the masters could own such property.
• However the master could not allow him to keep some property.
• Commercial and Other (matrimonial) Rights;
• The slave could lend money but the mast becomes the creditor.
• The slave cannot enter into any agreements .
• The master could however enforce an agreement of the slave.
• The marriages between slaves were not permitted.
• Slaves were considered as property belonging to the owner. The slave did not have
any rights whatsoever –life, property and social status of a slave acquires property
only in the name of the principle or master.
Patria Potestas
• Patria Potestasis the power exercised by the head of the family over members of that
family.
• Pater familia–is the eldest living male of the family.
• Pater familiahad absolute powers including;
• The right to inflict death over his subjects
• The power over the marriage of members of the family
• The right to sell the child for slavery
• The child did not have any rights to acquire property
• What he acquired belonged to the pater familia
• The child could not enter into contracts.
• Any benefit derived by a contract of the child were acquired by the pater familia.
Adoption; in forms
Adrogation
Adoption
Contractual Obligations
2. Commadatum;
This is a loan of Tangible things for some special use.
The borrower must exercise care over the property and return it as it was.
3. Depositum
This occurs when a person entrusts some property to another person for safe custody.
The receiver must return it upon request.
4. Pignus
This means the guarantee that is kept to make sure that a loan is paid back
Guardianship
a) The tutor can be appointed by last will upon the death of Pater Familia.
b) When a father dies, the brothers of the child become the tutors
c) The tutor can be appointed by declare –Where there is a minor who does not have authority,
any person may apply to the magistrate for appointment of the tutor.
• Functions of Tutor;
o Administration of the property of the minor
o Education of the minor
• (Look after the interest of child including education and property)
1. The tutor must take an oath to take due care of the minor
2. Their suitability was inquired into
3. He was responsible to payment of damages to any loss caused to the property of the minor.
4. The tutor could be challenged for misconduct.
• Termination of Tutorship
Tutorship came to an end in five ways;
2. Curator (Cura)
• All children under the age of 25 required a curator.
• The functions of the curator was to administer the property of the Child.
o Thus he had no control over the body of the minor
• The curator should grant his approval to transactions of a reasonable nature that the
minor wanted to undertake.
• The institution of Curawas intended to look after the interest of the persons who have
reached the age of puberty.
• Children under this would be, children below the age of 25, persons of unsound
mind and spend thrift (Prodiyan)
• The curator is required to look after the interest of the person under him.
Law of Property.
• Justinian’s Classification;
§ Things vested in private ownership.
§ Things open to anybody such as a harbor
§ Corporal and incorporeal property
§ Things in divine ownership.
Law of Succession
Intestate succession
Where the property is devolved according to the rules governing the devolution of property
on death , in the absence of a valid will. This was derived from the following sources; The
Twelve Tablets, The Praetors Edict , Imperial legislation before Justinian’s Novel 118 ,
Justinian’s Novels.
Testate succession
Creation of a will
• A valid will ab initio and it must be valid until the heir “enters” upon the inheritance
• The heir must duly enter
Valid will-
Ø The will must be in a proper form
Ø An heir or heirs must be duly instituted
Ø The testator, heir and witnesses must have testamentary capacity
Ø Certain persons must be either instituted or disinherited
In order to prevent property devolving on intestacy because of the failure to institute the heir
a legal device called Substitution of heirs was brought forward.
Substitution of heirs
Law of Delict.
• Delictual obligations were intended to provide relief for wrong inflicted upon the
property or reputation of a person.
1. Injuria;
o The word injuria denotes an insulting act which injures the dignity of a
freeman.
o It violates freeman’s right to his safety and reputation.
Eg; A assaults B without a just cause.
• Remedy;
o The XII Tables recognized compensation as the remedy.
o But the magistrate introduced an action called Actio Injurium.
§ The romans recognised different remedies against injuria from time to
time.
§ Eg. The XII Tables recognize compensation as a remedy retaliation
was permitted where the parties could not agree upon the amount of
compensation. The XII Tables recognized certain specific amounts of
compensation. Later magistrates introduced an advance remedy
known as Actio-injuriarum.
• There are 6 elements of Actio Injurium;
1. The action must be brought within a period of one year.
2. There should be an absence of self-defence on the part of the Defendant
3. The amount of damages is estimated by the plaintiff
o If the estimate is unreasonable the magistrate can modify the quantum of
damages.
4. The plaintiff or some other person may bring the action, for example pater familia can
bring the action on behalf of his son. (When more than one person is effected they all can
bring separate action. Eg. The son is defamed –both the pater famila and son are affected and
can thus bring action).
5. The affected party must show immediate resentment.
6. The liability can be transferred to the heirs of the defendant.
• Aggravated Insult;
• The Act;
o The act must be a positive act
o Omission does not necessarily result in liability.
o However an omission committed with a prior assumption of liability on the
part of the defendant (eg. A doctor who abandons a slave after a surgery is
liable because he is required to treat the patient after surgery.)
• The act must be wrongful;
o The act becomes wrongful where it is committed intentionally to cause
damages.
o The defendant acts negligently when he fails to observe the duty of care.
o Negligence is where every person is required to in every action exercise due
care not to harm or to cause any harm to any person.
• Financial Damage;
o Defendant’s wrongful act must cause damage to property of the Plaintiff,
resulting in financial loss.
• Award of Damages;
o Damages were awarded to the direct losses caused by the wrongful act –
actual value for the property.
o P can obtain as compensation the gain he might have acquired.
o The losses caused due to special circumstances.