Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ON
A. PREFACE 3
B. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 4
C. PART- 1
INTRODUCTION 6
COMPANY PROFILE 49
D. PART-2
RESEARCH METHODOLGY 63
FINDINGS 84
SUGGESTIONS 86
CONCLUSION 88
BIBLIOGRAPHY 89
APPENDIX 90
INTRODUCTION
PERFORMANCE APPRASIAL
A performance appraisal has been defined as any personnel decision that affects the status of
employee regarding their retention, termination, promotion, transfer, salary increase or decrease,
or admission into a training program.
Performance appraisal can be either formal or informal. Formal system is used for schedule
regular sessions in which an employee’s performance is discussed. Informal appraisals are
unplanned, often just chance statements made in passing about an employee’s performance. Most
organizations use a formal appraisal system. Some organization use more than one appraisal
system for different types of employees or for different appraisal purposes. Organizations need to
measure employees performance to determine whether acceptable standards of performance are
being maintained. The six primary criteria on which the value of performance may be assessed
are: quality, quantity, timeliness, cost effectiveness, need for supervision, and interpersonal
impact. The trend nowadays is in the direction of attempting to measure what the man does
rather than what he is- to measure what is the output rather than what is the input. The
observations and understanding of the performance appraisal process helped reduce a
monumental task into something much more manageable.
Performance appraisal could be taken either for evaluating the performance of employees or for
developing them. The evaluation is of two types: telling the employees he stands and using the
data for personnel decisions concerning pay, promotions, etc. The developmental objectives
focus on finding individual and organizational strengths and weaknesses; developing healthy
superior-subordinate relations; and offering appropriate counseling/coaching to the employee
with a view to develop his potential in future.
1. Compensation decisions: It can serves as a basis for pay raises. Managers need
performance appraisal to identify employees who are performing at or above expected
levels. This approach to compensation is at the heart of the idea that raises should be
given merit rather than for seniority. Under merit systems, employee receives raises
based on performance.
2. Promotion decisions: It can serves as a useful basis for job change or promotion. When
merit is the basis for reward the person doing the best job receives the promotion. If
relevant work aspects are measured properly, it helps in minimizing feelings of
frustration of those who are not promoted.
3. Training and development programs: It can serve as a guide for formulating a suitable
training and development program. Performance appraisal can inform employees about
their progress and tell them what skills they need to develop to become eligible for pay
raises or promotions or both.
4. Feedback: performance appraisal enables the employee to know how well he is doing on
the job. It tells him what he can do to improve his present performance and go up the
‘organizational ladder’.
5. Personal development: Performance appraisal can help reveal the causes of good and
poor employee performance. Through discussions with individual employees, a line
manager can find out why they perform as they do and what steps can be initiated to
improve their performance.
Main features
A performance appraisal is a systematic general and periodic process that assesses an individual
employee's job performance and productivity in relation to certain pre-established criteria and
organizational objectives. Other aspects of individual employees are considered as well, such
as organizational citizenship behavior, accomplishments, potential for future improvement,
strengths and weaknesses, etc.
To collect performance appraisal data, there are three main methods: objective production,
personnel, and judgmental evaluation. Judgmental evaluations are the most commonly used with
a large variety of evaluation methods. Historically, performance appraisal has been conducted
annually (long-cycle appraisals); however, many companies are moving towards shorter cycles
(every six months, every quarter), and some have been moving into short-cycle (weekly, bi-
weekly) performance appraisal. The interview could function as "providing feedback to
employees, counseling and developing employees, and conveying and discussing compensation,
job status, or disciplinary decisions". Performance appraisal is often included in performance
management systems. Performance appraisal helps the subordinate answer two key questions:
first, "What are your expectations of me?" second, "How am I doing to meet your expectations?"
Performance management systems are employed "to manage and align" all of an organization's
resources in order to achieve highest possible performance. "How performance is managed in an
organization determines to a large extent the success or failure of the organization. Therefore,
improving PA for everyone should be among the highest priorities of contemporary
organizations".
The main purpose of appraisal is to give the appraisee the opportunity to reflect on
their work and learning needs in order to improve their performance. This can be achieved
through discussing their development and feedback on their job performance in a way that is
constructive and motivational.
Definition
The process by which a manager or consultant (1) examines and evaluates an
employee's work behavior by comparing it with preset standards, (2)documents the results of the
comparison, and (3) uses the results to provide feedback to the employee to show
where improvements are needed and why.
Performance appraisals are employed to determine who needs what training, and who will be
promoted, demoted, retained, or fired.
The management forma accentuated objectives and contained consistent standards for all
management. The appraisal form for no management positions focused on job-relate
accountabilities included specific measures of performance, and incorporate differential
weighting schemes. However, it did not include objectives for individuals or teams, nor did it
encourage personal growth and development (PA) some authors have defined performance
appraisal. These definitions of performance appraisal are given below:
- Gary Dessler
3. “Performance appraisal is defined as a systematic periodic evaluation of the worth of an
individual of an organization, usually mad by a superior or someone in position to
observe his performance”.
- Bellows
4. “Performance appraisal is the systematic evaluation of the individual with respect to this
performance on the job and his potential of development”.
- Beach
- Leon C. Megginson
Improvements-
Although performance appraisals can be so easily biased, there are certain steps that can be taken
to improve the evaluations and reduce the margin of errors through the following:
Opposition
Not everyone is in favor of formal performance appraisal systems. Many employees, especially
those most affected by such ratings are not very enthusiastic about them. There are many critics
of these appraisals including labor unions and managers.
Labor Unions
Labor unions represent 11% (7% in the private sector) of the work force in the United States. In
some cases they may require that seniority be taken as one of the main criteria for promotion.
However, length of job experience may not always be a reliable indication of the ability to
perform a higher level job. That is why some employers give senior people the first opportunity
for promotion, but the employer may seek to further qualify the employee for that promotion
because of their abilities (not solely because of length of service). Performance appraisals may
provide a basis for assessment of employee merit as a component of these decisions.
Managers
Managers who have had unsatisfactory experiences with inadequate or poorly designed appraisal
programs may be skeptical about their usefulness.
Some managers may not like to play the role of a judge and be responsible for the future of
their subordinates.
They may be uncomfortable about providing negative feedback to the employees.
This tendency can lead them to inflate their assessments of the workers’ job performance,
giving higher ratings than deserved.
The main purpose of appraisal is to give appraise the opportunity to reflect on their work and
learning needs in order to improve their performance. This can be achieved through discussing
their development and feedback on their job performance in a way that is constructive and
motivational.
To help the employee to overcome his weaknesses and improve his strengths so as to
enable him to achieve the desired performance.
To generate adequate feedback and guidance from the immediate superior to an
employee working under him.
To contribute to the growth and development of an employee through helping him in
realistic goal setting.
To provide inputs to system of rewards (comprising salary increment, transfer,
promotions, demotions or terminations) and salary administration.
To help in creating a desirable culture and tradition in the organization.
To help the origination to identify employee for the purpose of motivating, training
To generate significant, relevant, free, and valid information about employees.
organizations and public enterprises, and a confidential report are submitted on the
performance of the employee in the organization. The main shortcoming of this system
is that an individual is not informed about his/her inherent strengths and weakness and,
therefore, is not given an opportunity to respond to the assessment made on him/her.
The performance appraisal process is one that few look forward to. However,
understanding the process can help managers and employees conduct a more
fruitful appraisal. At the University of Texas at Dallas, managers are taught that
"A chief purpose of any performance appraisal program is employee
development. This goal is accomplished by helping the employee to do a better
job and by developing in the employee the knowledge and skill to meet the future
needs of the work unit and the institution."
Establish a File
For managers to be effective and help employees develop skills and capabilities, essential to
begin the performance management process on the employees first day. Create a file for each
employee and record the accomplishments, areas for improvement and regular feedback
throughout the year.
Provide Regular Feedback
Regular feedback should occur at least once each quarter and more frequently if an employee
needs encouragement or motivation. According to the American Society for Clinical Laboratory
Science, The performance management process starts with employee planning and ends with an
evaluation of employee progress. Managers and employees should meet to discuss planning and
goals throughout the year. If possible, formally sitting down with your supervisor or manager on
a quarterly basis is optimal. The process, at its best, is a collaborative one which should add
value for both the employee and the employer. Employees thrive on feedback because it ensures
they are performing job duties and responsibilities according to the company’s expectations. The
feedback can be given in a casual manner, provided the topic of the feedback is suitable for a
casual meeting. Always document any feedback you provide to employees, even if is just to say.
Discipline Issues
Throughout the year, an employee may engage in behavior that warrants disciplinary action.
Your company procedure for addressing discipline should include a requirement to document
every disciplinary action taken. All disciplinary issues and improvements are taken into account
during the annual performance appraisal meeting.
Management by Objectives
Management by objectives, or MBOs, is another step in the performance appraisal process used
for some employees who have defined goals and steps to achieve each goal. These MBOs really
should be reviewed quarterly to track progress or redefine the goal if neither of you see enough
progress. MBOs are also particularly helpful to employees who are on a professional career track
within your business.
Conduct the Appraisal Meeting
As the time nears for scheduling the appraisal meeting, begin preparing the performance
appraisal document. Many companies have lengthy forms that require managers to record
relatively detailed information about the employees performance in all areas of the job.
Performance is rated in areas such as job proficiency, interpersonal relationships, communication
skills and aptitude. Some employers consider employee self-evaluations. In these cases, the
employee should prepare her comments about her performance during the past year. Both the
manager and the employee should feel comfortable during the appraisal meeting. Tension will
just make the meeting agenda much more difficult and uncomfortable than it needs to be.
Follow Up Action
After the performance appraisal meeting, there will likely be follow up matters such as
discussing areas for improvement, establishing goals for the next year and confirming the
employee's salary or wage increase. In addition, the manager and employee may schedule
another time to discuss irresolvable issues that arise during the performance appraisal meeting.
REASEARCH METHODOLOGY
Problem:
This study was undertaken to determine the satisfaction level of the employees with their
Performance Appraisal Technique. The research literature says that 360 degree performance
evaluation technique has been proved not to be very effective (according to Watson Wyatt's 2001
Human Capital Index (HCI)).
Rationale of problem:
The following are the rationale behind the problem.
360-degree feedback as a performance appraisal technique is found to be not very
effective.
Single performance appraisal systems are found to be ineffective.
Variable:
In this study, the main variable was performance appraisal. To know the effectiveness of this
technique, the present study was designed to compare and measure the satisfaction level of the
employees with regards to the Performance Appraisal Technique used between these three
companies.
Objective:
The main objective of this research is to study and compare the Performance Appraisal
Technique and measure the satisfaction level of the employees with the Performance Appraisal
Technique RSHR SERVICES..
Scope of the Survey: - This project was undertaken to know the extent to which
the employees of RSHR SERVICES., is satisfied and happy with their performance appraisal
system and environment which exists in that organization.
Research Design
A Research design is purely and simply the framework or plan for a study that guides the
collection and analysis of data. The survey research was used in this project, because employees’
feedback was necessary for obtaining the data.
Since the project is being conducted in RSHR SERVICES. On satisfaction level, in the hope of
new findings, we can RSHR SERVICES.ude that this is an ‘Exploratory’ type of research.
Area of Information
The study was to be done on certain specific area of information. These could be classified into:
Organizational System
Supervision
Role Clarity
Psychological Tool
The following psychological tool used in this study:
Employees Performance Appraisal Satisfaction Level Questionnaire (Investigated 2012).
The survey research was used in this project, because employee feedback was necessary for
obtaining the data.
Sample Size: The survey was conducted in the organization, 100 respondents from each
organization. All these respondents were from the executive level of the organization.
The sampling unit is only the employees of the organization. Sample unit consists of one
employee per questionnaire. This survey was done inside the organization.
Precautions:
The sampling used for this study was a ‘simple random sampling’ method.
The questionnaire was filled by directly meeting the employees of the organizations. All
the questions were answered by the respondents.
CHAPTER -II
COMPANY PROFILE
Presentations/Demonstration/Practical of concepts.
Handouts/Assignments/Real-time Exposure to work on Clients.
We aspire to apply excellence, candor and sincerity in our efforts to empower our
generation with knowledge and diligence to master corporate standards.
Learner's satisfaction is ensured through, best mix of desirable sincerity that our
professionals are a way ahead with. Satisfaction of learner is all what we seek. We tend to
provide individual focus to each of our learner to recognize a career with a fusion of
skills knowledge and attitude.
Satisfaction of RSHR Services India learner's is our goal and we aim to make sincere
efforts in providing best results.
Our Services:-
HR Practical Training
HR Audit Services
HR Payroll Services
Out Sourcing Services
Compliance Services (ESIC, PF, BONUS, Etc.)
Tax Consultant
Module 6 – Contract Labor (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 & Factory
Act 1948
Contract Labor (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 – Act, Applicability,
Registration and Licensing process, Forms and their usage, Various Registers to be maintained.
Factory Act 1948 – About Act, Applicability, Working Hours, Forms and Registers to be
maintained, Health and Safety, welfare etc.
HR ADUIT SERVICES:-
A pre-audit checklist will be provided to you with a list of documents we will review
during the audit.
An HR Works Consultant will meet with you onsite with the appropriate representative(s)
of your company to conduct the HR Audit.
At the completion of this analysis, we will provide a written report to your company. This
report will outline recommendations for strengthening the HR function, prioritize those
recommendations, and provide information to substantiate the recommendations. We will
also provide you with a toolkit to assist you in implementing recommendations.
An HR Works Consultant will conduct a follow up meeting to review the results of the
audit with the appropriate personnel.
HR PAYROLL SERVICES:-
RSHR SERVICES provides you with a full-fledged payroll solution that reduces your processing
costs while ensuring accurate, streamlined and consistent execution of your payroll and
compliance needs. Starting from payroll processing to tax proof management, expense
management, leave/absence management, client self service, employee self service, query
management and reports & analytics are offered as managed payroll services. Here are some of
the key highlights of our services.
Payroll processing
In addition to keeping up with constantly changing regulations, withholding rates and
government forms, payroll processing is a time-consuming and costly task for most businesses.
Let RSHR SERVICES take care of the heavy lifting for you – Payroll processing and
administrative functions that don't necessarily add to your bottom line. Our payroll processing
services include.
Support through the entire employee life-cycle, from date of joining to exit.
Cost effective and timely payroll processing.
Delivery of bank advice statements and customized MIS reports.
RSHR SERVICES is equipped with world class tools to help you strictly adhere to the
requirements of payroll compliance legislations, Our services include.
Generating statutory reports which include preparation and filing of PF forms, challans
and inspections.
Remittance of taxes as per the respective local statutory norms.
Preparing and submitting ESI wages and assisting on audits and inspections.
With complete functional know how of ERP (sap/ coda/ oracle etc), undertake direct tax services
for corporate clients. Our tax services for corporate clients include:
Day-to-day tax matters that include replying to various tax notices and providing necessary tax
support on regular tax matters.
Management of tax records and reports in both soft and hard files including documentation as
per sox.
Tax compliance that includes advance income tax and fringe benefit tax (fbt) calculations and
deposits, TDS compliance and filing of returns.
Compilation of tax details for audit and support to the auditors.
We provide all important information to statutory auditors or management auditors in relation to
tax matters.
We support in the compilation of transfer pricing documentation and certification.
We also guide in the compilation of corporate tax returns such as income tax, wealth tax and fbt,
and also it e-filing with the revenue department.
We provide support in the areas of pan, tan and online tax credits view also.
We provide tax reporting on defined frequencies such as monthly, quarterly, annually to parent
company according to their formats.
Compilation of various details for tax assessment purposes such as scrutiny and appellate level
for income tax and transfer pricing.
2. The grievance mechanism acts as a foundation for a harmonious and healthy relationship
between employee and employer.
3. The grievance mechanism ensures a fair and just treatment of employee’s concerns and
prompt resolution of grievances without discrimination, coercion, restraint or reprisal
against any employee who may submit or be involved in a grievance.
CHAPTER-III
Performance appraisal is needed in every organization at every hierarchy level to assess the
performance of each and every employee in the work spot .Performance appraisal is a method
which highlights the employee needs and opportunities for personal growth and development.
Performance appraisal is essential to understand & improve the employees’ performance through
human resources development (HRD). In fact, performance appraisal is the basis for HRD. It
was viewed that performance appraisal was useful to decide upon employee promotion/ transfer,
determinate on & the like. But the recent developments in human resources management
indicates that performance appraisal is the basis for employee development, it the indicates the
level of desired performance level, level of actual performance and the gap between these two.
This gap should be bridged through human resource development technique like training,
executive development etc.
.
2. To portray the profile of beverages industry with a special focus on RSHR Services.
4. To elicit the opinion of employee of RSHR SERVICES regarding the existing system of
performance appraisal.
RESEARCH DESIGN:
Research Design refers to "framework or plan for a study that guides the collection and analysis
of data". A typical research design of a company basically tries to resolve the following issues:
e) Developing Questionnaires
a) Descriptive or
b) Experimental
Thus, it was mix of both the tools of Research Design that is, Explorative as well as Conclusive.
SAMPLING PLAN:
Duration = 6 Weeks
DATA COLLECTION
Data Sources
3. Contact Method
4. Personal Interaction
1 Pie Diagrams
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Duration for which the respondent has been working in RSHR SERVICES..
This question was asked to the employees working in RSHR SERVICES. to find out the
duration for which they have been working in the organization, based upon which we can know
if the employees are satisfied with their job in the company or not.
3%
17%
25%
55%
3 percent of the respondents are dealing with RSHR SERVICES. for less than a year. 55 percent
of the respondents are dealing in RSHR SERVICES. from 1-5 yrs. 55 percent of the respondents
are dealing in RSHR SERVICES. from 5-10 yrs. 25 percent of the respondents are dealing in
RSHR SERVICES. for over 10 yrs.
7%
30%
63%
63 percent of the respondents are very satisfied in setting their goals and objectives in the
beginning of the year. 30 percent of the respondents are satisfied in setting their goals and
objectives in the beginning of the year. 7 percent of the respondents are dissatisfied in setting
their goals and objectives in the beginning of the year.
This question was asked to the employees of RSHR SERVICES. To rates the standards of
various PA strategies and programs that take place in the organization.
0%
30%
70%
70 percent of the respondents rate the Performance Appraisal strategies as good. 30 percent of
the respondents rate the Performance Appraisal strategies as average. None of the respondents
rates the Performance Appraisal strategies as bad.
This question was asked to the employees to know if the performance appraisal strategies are fair
and objective to the employees.
0%
16%
84%
84 percent of the respondents say that the Performance Appraisal strategies are fair and
objective. 16 percent of the respondents say that the Performance Appraisal strategies are not fair
and objective. None of the respondents are there who can’t say anything.
This question was asked to the employees to know how important it is to appraise an employee.
Yes No
0%
100%
100 percent of the respondents say that it is necessary to appraise an employee. None of the
respondents says that it is necessary to appraise an employee.
This question was asked to the employees to know if they are made clear on what is expected of
them so that they can work accordingly.
Yes No
0%
100%
100 percent of the respondents say that they are clear with what is expected of them. None of the
respondents say that they are not clear with what is expected of them.
Feedback is given to the Management Cadre Staff for the task accomplished by them.
This question was asked to the employees to know if they are provided with proper feedback for
the task they accomplish, based upon which they can work better in future.
Yes No
38%
62%
62 percent of the respondents say that the feedback is given to the MCS for the task
accomplished by them. 38 percent of the respondents say that the feedback is not given to the
MCS for the task accomplished by them.
This question was asked to the employees to know if they are motivated by accepting their
suggestions and innovations in the form of rewards.
Yes No
35%
65%
35 percent of the respondents say that their suggestions and innovations are rewarded. 65 percent
of the respondents say that their suggestions and innovations are not rewarded.
This question was asked to the employees to know if the employees’ problems are dealt well by
their supervisors so that their morale increases and they are satisfied with their job.
Yes No
28%
72%
72 percent of the respondents say that the supervisors take interest in sharing their personal
concern. 28 percent of the respondents say that the supervisors do not take interest in sharing
their personal concern.
This question was asked to the employees to know if the annual increments/promotions are based
on their performance or not.
3%
15%
82%
82 percent of the respondents say that the annual increments/promotions are based on their
performance. 15 percent of the respondents say that the annual increments/promotions are not
based on their performance. 3 percent of the respondents can’t say or their answers are
inapplicable.
This question was asked to the employees to know the extent of satisfaction in interdepartmental
teamwork based on which their effectiveness in work can be known.
22% 28%
50%
28 percent of the respondents are very satisfied with interdepartmental teamwork. 50 percent of
the respondents are just satisfied with interdepartmental teamwork. 22 percent of the respondents
are dissatisfied with interdepartmental teamwork.
This question was asked to the employees to know how far the training and development
program is helping the employees to learn and work better.
Table 12: Extent of help of training and development programs in improving employees’
performance
8%
22%
70%
22 percent of the respondents say that the training and development programs help to a great
extent to improve their performance. 70 percent of the respondents say that the training and
development programs help to some extent to improve their performance. 8 percent of the
respondents say that the training and development programs help to a very little extent to
improve their performance.
This question was asked to the employees to know the extent of use of performance appraisal
system in job rotation.
0%
12%
88%
12 percent of the respondents say that performance appraisal system is mostly used in job
rotation. 88 percent of the respondents say that performance appraisal system is partially used in
job rotation. None of the respondents say that performance appraisal system is not at all used in
job rotation.
This question was asked to the employees to know how far the performance appraisal system is
actually helping them in their work.
Completely Partially
35%
65%
65 percent of the respondents say that the purpose of performance appraisal is completely
fulfilled. 35 percent of the respondents say that the purpose of performance appraisal is partially
fulfilled.
RSHR SERVICES. always strives for continuous individual improvements.
This question was asked to the employees to know how far they agree with the fact that RSHR
SERVICES. Always strives for continuous individual improvements.
Table 15: RSHR SERVICES. Always strives for continuous individual improvements
Particulars No. of respondents Percentage of respondents
Strongly agree 22 22%
Agree 58 58%
Disagree 15 15%
Strongly disagree 5 5%
Total 100 100%
Chart 15: RSHR SERVICES. Always strives for continuous individual improvements
5%
15% 22%
58%
22 percent of the respondents strongly agree that RSHR SERVICES. Always strives for
continuous individual improvements. 58 percent of the respondents agree that RSHR
SERVICES. Always strives for continuous individual improvements. 15 percent of the
respondents disagree with RSHR SERVICES. Always strives for continuous individual
improvements. 5 percent of the respondents strongly disagree with RSHR SERVICES. Always
strives for continuous individual improvements.
CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS
1. Presence of a firmly implemented career plan- good sense of growth.
2 .High proportion of routine work during training immediately and after that
1) Organization climate-
The study on Performance Appraisal at RSHR SERVICES has given me opportunity to have a
closer look at the imperatives of the performance Appraisal System as a domain of HR delivery.
It has enhanced my knowledge as how an organization work and operates to perform its
operations effectively and efficiently. The project has not only helped me to have close insight
into the practical implication of business process but also the performance appraisal is done.
While going through the different process followed at RSHR SERVICES within performance
Appraisal, I came to know of the importance of performance appraisal. This opportunity to work
as researcher has helped me understanding the theoretical and practical aspects of management.
The summer project, also made me realize the importance of HR as a fascinating function in an
organization. I got to know of the importance of communication and interpersonal skill in getting
things done from others. In a nut shell, it was great learning for me as management student.
With the help of personal interview and discussion with the employee and on the basis of
instrument of defined questionnaire I reached on the following co RSHR SERVICES. According
to respond given against the question no. 1, 2, 3, it can RSHR SERVICES.ude that majority of
the respondent are know about the Performance Appraisal System and they feel its need in the
organization, they rated it good. It means that Performance Appraisal System is satisfactory in
the organization.
BIBLOGRAPHY
Websites:
www.hrtoturial.word.com
www.google.com
www.indianfoline.com
www.economictimes.com
Journals:
Gitam Journal of Management.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental medicine.
Indian Journal of Social Work.
Indian Journal of Human Resource.
ANNEXURES
Questionnaire
3. How are the Performance Appraisal strategies and programs in the company?
□ Good
□ Average
□ Bad
No
No
Cannot say
Average
Bad
12. To what extent do training and development programs help in improving your
performance?
To great extent
To some extent
13. How far is the Performance Appraisal system used for job rotation?
Mostly
Partially
Nil
14. To what extent is the purpose of Performance Appraisal fulfilled?
Completely
Partially
Nil
15. Does RSHR SERVICES. Always strive for continuous individual improvement?
strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
strongly disagree
Quarterly
Yearly
Others
Promotion
Pay rise
Others
18. Is there any conflict arise between employees after performance appraisal is made?
Frequently
Often
Sometimes
Never
19. Are there any job expectations established before performance appraisal?
Frequently
Often
Sometimes
Never
Superiors
Subordinates
Clients
All
Total output
Behavioral efficiency
Both
Yes
No
23. Does any change arise after appraising the performances of employees?
Yes
No
Negative
Both
24. Does performance appraisal process help to raise organization’s total output?
Yes
No
25. Are you satisfied with the appraisal process of the organization?
Yes
No
Moderately satisfied
26. Do you feel performance appraisal process is sufficient in appraising the performances
of employees or you need some alternatives to it?
Sufficient
Alternative