Sunteți pe pagina 1din 6

I.

MEDICAL EVIDENCE

1. Piara Singh
2. Daubert v. Meraldo Pharmaceutical
3. State of Haryana v. Bhagirath [AIR 1999 SC 2005]
4. Purshottam v. State of MP AIR 1980 SC 1873:
5. Panna v. State of UP 1992 CrLJ 1747:
6. Nagindra Bala Mitraand v. Sunil Chandra Roy AIR 1960 SC 796
7. Solanki Chimnaibhai Ukabhai v State of Gujarat
8. Lakshmi Singh v State of Bihar [AIR 1976 SC 2263]
9. State of Haryana v. Ram Singh AIR 2002 SC 620.
10. Ghurey v Rex
11. Ram Charan vs. State of U.P. [1992 CriLJ 1567];
12. Daulat Singh Case
13. Baburam v State of Madhya Pradesh [AIR 2002 SC 758]
14. Duvasi Ramulu vs. State of Andhra Pradesh [1996 CriLJ 402]
15. Brij Lal v Haryana

II. HANDWRITING AND FINGERPRINTS

Handwriting
1. Balkrishna Devi:
2. State v. Kadhu Charan Banik
3. State of Maharasthra v Sukhdeo singh

Fingerprint
1. Jennings
2. Bhaluka Bahera v. The State (AIR 1957 Ori 172)
3. M.P v. Sitaram (1978 GLJ 1220)
4. Mohan Lal v. Ajit Singh AIR 1978 SC 1183:
5. Dharamdev Yadav 2012
DNA
1. Kamti Devi v Poshi Ram
2. Phool Kumar v Delhi Administration

III. BALLISTIC EXPERT:

1. Kalua v UP
2. Jessica lal case
3. CBI v Pattam Malla
4. GHUREY LAL v UP

IV. DYING DECLARATION

1. Narayan Swaami v. Emperor:


2. Karnataka v. Sharif:
3. Kaushal Rao v. Bombay 1958
4. Bhagirath v. Haryana AIR 1997 SC 234
5. Queen v. Abdullah (1884):
6. Narayan Singh v Bihar
7. Kalavati v. Maharashtra AIR 2009 SC 1932
8. Shaik Nagoor v. AP AIR 2008 SC 1500

V. METHOD OF PROVING FACT AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE

1. Bharat Kumar v. State of Kerala AIR 1997 Kerala HC 291:


2. Bachhan Singh:
3. Tata Ltd Chemicals v. Saboo Singh AIR 1994 All 66:
4. Girjadatta v. Gangatam Dutta (AIR 1955 SC 346)
5. Marwari Kumar v. Bhagwan Puri (AIR 2000 SC 2629)
6. Banarasi Das v. Janaki Devi (AIR 1955 Pat 172).
7. Navjot Sandhu
8. Anwar v Basheer (2014).
9. The State Of Maharashtra vs Dr. Praful B. Desai

VI. ILLEGAL AND TAPE RECORDED RECORDED EVIDENCE

1. RM Malkhani v State of Maharasthra:

VII. CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

1. Bodh Raj v. State of J&K (Circumstantial Evidence)


2. Padala Veera Reddy
3. Tomasa Bruno case

VIII. SECTION 6

1. Gentela Vijayavardhan Rao and Anr. v. State of A.P.


2. Sukhar v State of UP (1999)

IX. SECTION 7

1. Dr. Jainand v. Rex.

X. SECTION 9:

1. Bhawal Sanyasi
2. State of Maharasthra v Suresh
3. Shiv Kumar v State of MP
XI. SECTION 8

1. R v Palmer
2. Nathuni Yadav

XII. SECTION 10:

1. Kehar Singh and Ors v. State:


2. Mirza Akbar v. King Emperor AIR 1940 PC 176:
3. R v. Blake
4. State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) vs Navjot Sandhu:

XIII. ALIBI

1. Jayantibhai v. State of Gujarat:


2. Munshi Prasad v. State of Bihar AIR 2001 SC 3031:
3. Tomasa Bruno

XIV. CONFESSIONS AND ADMISSIONS

1. Pakala Narayn Swami


2. Aghnoo Nagosia v. State of Bihar:
3. Pulukuri Kotayya v. Emperor (1946): Privy council narrowed the application of S.27.
4. State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) vs Navjot Sandhu:
5. Bhagirath v. State of MP AIR 1959 MP 17:
6. Kashmira Singh v. MP AIR 1952 SC 159: Section 30
7. Sahadevan v. T.N AIR 2012 SC 2435:
XV. SECTION 27

1. Bhup Singh case


2 .Najot Sandhu
3. Kottaiya case

XVI. SECTION 30

Kashmira Singh v. MP AIR 1952 SC 159

XVII. SECTION 34:

CBI vs VC Shukla

XVIII. SECTION 91 AND 92: BEST EVIDENCE

Roop Kumar v Mohan Thedani

XIX. SECTION 123 AND 124: AFFAIRS OF STATE

State of UP v Raj Narain

XX. TYPE OF EVIDENCE

Mukhtiar Singh v. Punjab

XXI. CREDIBILITY OF WITNESS

1. Rameshwar Prasad vs Rajasthan


2. Israr vs UP
XXII. CHILD WITNESS

1. Dhan Raj v Maharastha


2. Bhagwan Singh v MP
3. MP v Chamru

XXIII. HUSBAND WIFE COMMUNICATION

1. Ram Bharose vs UP

2. MC Verghese v Poonam

XXIV. COMPLETION OF CROSS EXAMINATION

1. Dev Parla Builders v Madhuri Jalan


2. Rajasthan v Teja Ram
3. Bharat Singh v Bhagirath
4. Bihar v Lalu Prasad
5. Zahira Sheikh v Begum

XXV. LAST SEEN THEORY

1. Rajasthan vs Thakur Singh


2. Rajasthan vs Kashi Ram
3. Tomaso Bruno vs UP