Sunteți pe pagina 1din 14

NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION

Pro-forma for Pre-Qualifiers TIER-II Institutions

PARTA- Profile of the Institute

Name of the Program applied for:

A1. Name of the College:-

The Shetkari Shikshan Mandal’s


Padmabhooshan Vasantdada Patil Institute of Technology
Location of the College:-
S.N. 33/22, Near, Pirangut Rd, Chandni Chowk, Bavdhan, Pune,

Year of Establishment:- 2006

A2.Address:-

S.N. 33/22, Near, Pirangut Rd, Chandni Chowk, Bavdhan, Pune


State:-Maharashtra City:-Pune
Website:-https://www.pvpittssm.edu.in/ Pin Code:-411021
STD Code:- 020 E-mail:- principal@pvpittssm.edu.in
Fax STD Code:- 020 Phone No:-020-22948000
Fax: 020-22948000

A3. Head of the Institution:-

Name:- Dr. C. M. Sedani Designation:- Principal

Status of Appointment:- Regular

A4. Contact details of Head of the Institution:-

STD Code:- 020 TelephoneNo:-020-22948002

Mobile:- 9067891970 E-mail:- principal_pvpit@tssm.edu.in

FaxSTD Code:-020 FaxNo:-020-22948000


1
A5. Name of the Affiliating University:-
Savitribai Phule Pune University

Address:-Ganeshkhind Rd, Ganeshkhind, Pune

City:- Pune

State:-Maharashtra PinCode:-411004

Website:-http://www.unipune.ac.in/ E-mail:- dyracademic@unipune.ac.in

STDCode:- 020 PhoneNo:-020-25691233

FaxSTD Code:- 020 Fax:-020-25691233

2
A6. Type of the Institution:

University DeemedUniversity
GovernmentAided Autonomous
Affiliated

A7. Ownership Status:

CentralGovernment StateGovernment
GovernmentAided Selffinancing

Trust Societ
y
Section 25
Any Other (Please specify)
Company

Provide Details:

A8. Students Admissions (Institute level considering all UG programs):


CAY CAY
CAY 2019- m1 m2
Item Total
20 2018- 2017-
19 18
480 480 480 1440
Sanctioned intake

150 221 159 530


Number of students admitted
% of Students Admitted for previous three academic years including 36.80%
current academic year ( Total Admitted/Sanctioned Intake )
Kindly note that the year mentioned here is exemplary, institute has to consider the
academic years as per the definition given in the document and according to the
prevailing year.
Table A8

3
A9. Campus Information:-

Does the College have its own building: Yes

Sports Complex:-Yes

Canteen and Hostel (If any):- Yes

Medical Room:- Yes

Computer Laboratories: Yes

Counseling and guidance:-Yes

Placement:- Yes

4
A10. Names of programs offered by the
College:- UG:- Mechanical Engineering
PG:-Mechanical Engineering
Note: - Please mention department wise.

A11. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application.

S. No. Program
Name
1 UG - Mechanical Engineering

Table A11

5
PART B- Program information as per point A11
(To be filled separately for all the programs applied for)

B1. Provide separate Information for each program applied for (including shifts if
any):-

Name Increase
of the Initia /
Name of progra l decreas AICTE
Name of m to Yea Year Accredita
the
the
r of Intak e in of
Appro
tion
progra be e intake, val
Departme consid Sta if any increas Status*
ms Letter
nt er rt e
running (mention No.
- the no.
ed of seats
increase
d/de
creased,
also)
Mechanical Mechanical 90
Mechanical 2006- Applying First
Engineering Engineering 60 (Increase by 2009-2010
Engineering 2007 Time
(Shift – I) (Shift – I) 30)
Mechanical Mechanical 120
Mechanical 2006- Applying First
Engineering Engineering 60 (Increase by 2012-2013
Engineering 2007 Time
(Shift – I) (Shift – I) 30)
Mechanical Mechanical 120
Mechanical 2012- Applying First
Engineering Engineering 60 (Increase by 2013-2014
Engineering 2013 Time
(Shift – II) (Shift – II) 60)
Table B1
Note: Please mention all increase intake starting from the first increase for all programs

* Write applicable one:

 Applying first time


 Granted provisional accreditation for two/three years for the period(specifyperiod)
 Granted accreditation for 5 /6 years for the period (specify period)
 Not accredited (specify visit dates,year)
 Withdrawn (specify visit dates,year)
 Not eligible for accreditation
 Eligible but not applied

6
B2. Student Admissions (Program specific):-

CAY CAY
CAY
Item m1 m2 Total
2019-
2018- 2017-
20
19 18
Sanctioned intake 240 300 300 840

Number of students admitted 31 94 58 183


% of Students Admitted for previous three academic years including
21.78
current academic year ( Total Admitted/Sanctioned Intake )
Kindly note that the year mentioned here is exemplary, institute has to consider the
academic years as per the definition given in the document and according to the
prevailing year.
Table B2

7
B3. Information of Faculty

Please provide the list of faculty in the Department as per the below
format separately (year wise) for each year under consideration

mention Full time


Date of Joining

Associate

(Regular/Contract/
Qualification

Designation

ed (Y/N)
ProfessorAssociat

(In case Currently


Specialization

or Part time
Date of Leaving
Date on which

If contractual
S. No.

Designated as

Currently

Nature of

Associated is
Association
Area of

Professor/

Adjunct)
PAN No.
Name

Separate Sheets attached below

Table B3
B3.1. No. of the AvailableFaculty

Number of Faculty in the


Department for both UG
and PG
S. No. Designation/Numbers
CAY CAYm1
1. Professor 2 4

2. Associate Professor 6 6
3. Assistant Professor 32 48
Number of Ph. D
4. (as per the AICTE norms) 4 6

Table B3.1

 At least one Professor or Associate professor with PhD. degree on


regular basis should be available exclusively for the department of
the program under consideration

B3.2. Detail of Head of the Department for the program under consideration:

8
Name:- Dr. N. B. Kardekar

Qualification:- Ph. D

9
B.4.Student Faculty Ratio (No of Faculty as per the sanctioned intake):-
(To be calculated at Department Level)
No. of UG Programs in the Department (n): 01

No. of PG Programs in the Department(m): 02

No. of Students in UG 2ndYear= 167 (u1)

No. of Students in UG 3rdYear= 176 (u2)

No. of Students in UG 4thYear= 294 (u3)

No. of Students in PG 1stYear= 12 (p1)

No. of Students in PG 2ndYear= 11 (p2)

No. of Students = Sanctioned Intake + Actual Admitted lateral entry students

(The above data to be provided considering all the UG and PG programs of the
department)

S=Number of Students in the Department = UG1 + PG1+ PG2= 900+48+48 = 996


F = Total Number of Faculty Members in the Department (excluding first year faculty)
= 39

Student Teacher Ratio (STR) = S / F = 996/40 = 25.54 (CAY)

1
0
CA
Year CAY Ym CAYm2
1
u1.1 300 300 300
u1.2 300 300 355
u1.3 300 355 344
UG1 u1.1+u1.2+u1.3 u1.1+u1.2+u1.3 u1.1+u1.2+u1.3
… 900 955 999
UG1 900 955 999
p1.1 24 24 24
p1.2 24 24 24
PG1 48 48 48
P2.1 24 24 24
P2.2 24 24 24
PG2 48 48 48
Total No. of
Students in the UG1 + PG1+PG2 UG1 +PG1+ PG2 UG1 +PG1+PG2
Department (S)
996 1051 1095

No. of
Faculty inthe F=39 F=43 F=63
Department
(F)
SFR1= SFR2= SFR3=
Student Faculty S1/F1= S2/F2= S3/F3=
Ration (SFR)
25.54 43 63
Average SFR SFR=(SFR1+SFR2+SFR3)/3=22.45

Table B.4

Note: Minimum 75% should be Regular faculty and the remaining shall be
Contractual Faculty* as per AICTE norms and standards.
*The contractual faculty (doing away with the terminology of
visiting/adjunct faculty, whatsoever) who have taught for 2 consecutive
semesters in the corresponding academic year on full time basis shall be
considered for the purpose of calculation in the Student Faculty Ratio

1
1
Compliance status to Pre-Visit Qualifiers

Complianc
e Status
S.N Current Complied/
Pre Visit Qualifiers Not
. Status Complied
Essential qualifiers
Vision, Mission & PEOs
i. Are the Vision & Mission of
the Department stated in the
Prospectus /Website? Yes Complied
1 ii. Are the PEOs of the Program
listed in the Prospectus
/Website?
Whether approval of AICTE for
the programs under consideration
Yes Complied
2 has been obtained for all the years
including current year
Whether admissions in the
undergraduate programs at the
Institute level has been more than No Not Complied
3 or equal to 50% *average of the
CAY, CAYm1 and
CAYm2.
Whether admissions in the
undergraduate programs under
consideration has been more than Yes Complied
4 or equal to 50% **average of the
CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2.
Whether faculty student ratio in
the department under
consideration is better than or Yes Complied
5
equal to 1:25 average of CAY, 22.45
CAYm1 andCAYm2.
Whether at least one Professor or
one Associate Professor on regular
basis with Ph.D. degree is Complied
6 availablein the Yes
respective Department during
CAY and CAYm1.

1
2
Whether number of available
Ph.Ds. in the department is
greater than or equal to 10% of Yes Complied
7 the required number of faculty
average of CAY andCAYm1.
Whether two batches have passed
out in the programs under Yes Complied
8
consideration

1
3
Desirable parameters
1 Whether department has
program assessment and quality
Yes Complied
improvement committee. If so, its
constitution and mandate.
2 Whether the departments under
consideration receives separately
earmarked funds for
i. Maintenance of
Laboratory/computati
onal Yes Complied
facilities(recurring
funds)
ii. Up-gradation
of laboratory/computation
facilities(non-
recurringfunds)
3 Whether HODs possess Ph.D
degreesfor Yes Complied
the programs under consideration
4 Whether number of available
Ph.Ds in the department exceeds
15% of the required number of Yes/No ??
faculty for previous
two academic years
5 Whether admissions in
the undergraduate
programs
under consideration %
has been more than 60% (average
of the previous threeacademic
years)

*Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of students


migrated to other institutions, plus the number of students migrated to this institution
divided by the sanctioned intake.

**Total number of students admitted in first year in the respective program minus
number of students migrated to other programs/ institutions plus the number of
students migrated to this program divided by the sanctioned intake in the
respectiveprogram.

1
4

S-ar putea să vă placă și