Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Robin Lilja
School of Innovation, Design and Technology
Mälardalen University, Sweden
rla06001@student.mdh.se
2 Theory 1
2.1 Myoelectricity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2.2 Noise recognition, prevention and rejection . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3 Implementation 3
3.1 Analog system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.2 Digital system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4 Results 6
1 Introduction
Making a machine or device to interpret the voltage differences arising in the
human muscles when they are statically or dynamically contracted, provides
the opportunity to let humans have a more natural process when controlling its
surrounding. Providing such control creates new possibilities in a wide range of
applications from medical and industrial to entertainment.
Thinking of the opportunities of myoelectrical control - the ability of making
a prosthesis working as a veridical body part - may first strike one’s mind. In
this subject field the human machine integration has been taken even further by
true neural interfaces [4]. A more sophisticated technique has been developed,
enabling a two-way communication for advanced motorical functions and sense.
Even though the human body is physical intact, disorders may reduce a
person’s ability to move. In this case the body could be supported by a re-
inforcing external skeleton - a solution also applicable for humans working in
harsh environments, which require them to make heavy lifts. To make such ex-
ternal skeleton a practical solution requires an interpretation of the demanded
movement via a natural interface. This creates a feeling for the human as if the
body movement was real. This solution could be implemented by the usage of
myoelectrical control.
2 Theory
2.1 Myoelectricity
Muscular tension is the result of an action potential propagating from the central
nervous system to a motor neuron, a neuron connected to a set of muscle fibers.
Such constellation between a motor neuron and muscle fibers are called motor
units. The action potential reaching the motor neuron is transmitted to all the
connected fibers in that motor unit, generating a motor unit action potential
(MUAP). During an electromyography the super positioned electro physical
signal activity in a muscle is viewed, consisting of frequencies up to 1 kHz.
The strongest amplitudes are to be found in the 50 to 350 Hz band [1]. The
MUAP activity is repeated 7 to 20 times a second depending on the muscle
type and physiological state - a fatigue muscle tends to utilize a lower frequency
compensated by higher amplitude. The detected amplitude normally ranges
up to 5 mV for surface electrodes and up to 10 mV when using indwelling
electrodes [2].
The signal interpretation of the commanded muscle force can be performed in
a number of different ways. Regarding this particular application of myoelectric
control a linear envelope detection and integration method is appropriate [3]; a
method which provides a measure of the electrical energy produced by a muscle
as an indication of its work.
1
CEL501 - Electromedicine Myoelectric control interface Mälardalen University, Sweden
2
CEL501 - Electromedicine Myoelectric control interface Mälardalen University, Sweden
3 Implementation
The system is implemented in two major subsystems, one analog responsible for
the amplification, filtering and demodulation. The second is digital accommo-
dating the analog to digital conversion, signal interpretation and servo control.
The instrumental amplifier INA128 has been selected as the front end ampli-
fier due to its high CMRR at high gain factors. A gain of 58 dB where selected,
believed to utilizing the available output voltage interval (+/- 5 V) in a satis-
factory manner. In order to avoid DC biasing of the human body, making the
measurements unstable, the front end have been complemented by a feedback
circuit driving the potential to a stable reference level.
After the front end amplifier, the signal is passed through a second order
high pass filter having its cut off frequency at 30 Hz. Rejecting motion artifacts,
however still letting the lower end of the frequency band of interest passing
through. In order to band pass the signal, a first order low pass filter is applied,
rejecting frequencies over 600 Hz.
The signal is after the amplification and band pass filtration prepared for
envelope detection and demodulation. A precision half wave rectifier has been
applied as the function of an envelope detector. This precision rectifier where
selected because it compensates for the diodes non-linearity, a feature that prob-
ably will affect the output if only one single diode is applied as detector circuit.
3
CEL501 - Electromedicine Myoelectric control interface Mälardalen University, Sweden
Figure 2: Simple band pass filter design, consisting of a high pass filter cascaded
with a low pass filter.
Figure 3: The precision half wave rectifier and low pass filter, performing as a
detector and demodulator.
4
CEL501 - Electromedicine Myoelectric control interface Mälardalen University, Sweden
5
CEL501 - Electromedicine Myoelectric control interface Mälardalen University, Sweden
4 Results
The electrode was applied to the first dorsal interosseous muscle in the human
hand, between the thumb and the index finger. In the first case, two states of
the signal where captured, visualized accordingly figure 6, the state after the en-
velope detector and after the demodulator. In the second case the demodulated
signal was compared to the servo position, illustrated in figure 7. The signals
where in the both cases generated by distinct flexions of the index finger.
6
CEL501 - Electromedicine Myoelectric control interface Mälardalen University, Sweden
Figure 6: Detection and demodulation signals recorded from the first dorsal
interosseous (hand) muscle.
Figure 7: Servo position and demodulated EMG recorded during two index
finger flexions.
7
CEL501 - Electromedicine Myoelectric control interface Mälardalen University, Sweden
8
CEL501 - Electromedicine Myoelectric control interface Mälardalen University, Sweden
References
[1] A. Herrera, A. Bernal, D. Isaza, M. Adjouadi. Design of an Electrical Prosthetic
Gripper using EMG and Linear Motion Approach. Florida International Univer-
sity, Miami.
[2] David M. Thompson. Electromyography, 1998. University of Oklahoma Health
Sciences Center, Oklahoma. http://moon.ouhsc.edu/dthompso/pk/emg/emg.htm
[3] D. Gordon E. Robertson. Electromyography: Processing. University of Ottawa,
Ottawa, Canad. www.health.uottawa.ca/biomech/courses/apa4311/emg-p2.pps
[4] Peter Fromherz. Neuroelectronic Interfacing: Semiconduc-
tor Chips with Ion Channels, Nerve Cells and Brain, 2003.
Max Plank Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
http://www.biochem.mpg.de/mnphys/publications/02fro3/02fro3.pdf
[5] Ron Mancini. Op Amps For Every One, 2002. Texas Instruments.
http://focus.ti.com/lit/an/slod006b/slod006b.pdf
[6] Dan Lavry. Sampling Theory For Digital Audio, 2004. Lavry Engineering.
http://www.lavryengineering.com/documents/Sampling Theory.pdf