Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Basic Buddhism
A Modern Introduction to
the Buddha's Teaching
by Dr Victor A. Gunasekara
Third Edition
CONTENTS
Preface to this Edition
Appendices
8. Right Concentration.
This is the
concentration of mind
associated with
wholesome consciousness
which could be achieved
through the systematic
cultivation of
meditation. Progress
along this line is
"progress" is probed and special
instructions given. The teacher
CHAPTER 5
is very often looked upon as a
The Role of Meditation "guru" as in the Hindu
tradition. This type of
We have seen that the Buddhist
meditative exercise is often
path consists of
represented as the exclusive way
wisdom/knowledge, ethical
to "practice" Buddhism. We shall
conduct, and mental development.
use the term "stylised
Some teachers put an almost (17)
exclusive emphasis on the last meditation" to designate this
of these (calling it kind of meditation.
"meditation") as the route to Meditation on the other hand has
the other two. Because of the always been a valid part of
widespread propagation of this Buddhist practice (note however
view in the West it is worth that is a part, nor the whole of
considering it in some detail(16) it). The task is then to
. differentiate genuine Buddhist
meditation from stylised
The widely held picture of
meditation. Buddhist mediation
meditation in the West is one
is the practice of the last two
where the meditator sits in
components of the eightfold path
silent company, usually in the
(sati and samādhi) in the
"lotus position", and is engaged
"right"(sammā) manner. The Pali
in inward contemplation. The
term that is used to denote
session may last from a half-
stylised meditation is bhavanā.
hour to several hours. It is
This term is not used with great
generally a congregational
frequency in the Pali Canon and
activity but it is usually
when used is associated with
presided over by a teacher who
mental development from whatever
determines the duration of the
kind of activity that will
session and may give directions
improve the mind.
as to how the activity is to
proceed. Practitioners are Stylised meditation is derived
encouraged to engage in the from meditation practices in the
activity individually at home if principal Asian Theravada
congregational meditation is not countries, viz. Sri Lanka, Burma
possible. Often special and Thailand each of which has
meditation retreats are held developed their own meditation
lasting from 3 to 14 days in traditions. In spite of the
which up to 12 hours a day may diversity within each country a
be devoted to meditation few broad generalisation may be
activities. Because of the long possible. In Sri Lanka the
periods involved sitting primary focus of Buddhist
meditation is alternated with practice has been on the
"walking meditation", sometimes cultivation of paññā and in the
also with yogic exercises. Often development of ethical practice
silence is enforced during the (sîla). Meditation has not
retreat (called the Rule of occupied great prominence and
Golden Silence), and the teacher has been undertaken on an
has individual meetings with individual basis, rarely
each participant during which performed in a congregational
the individual practitioner's setting. In this the Sri Lankan
Buddhists have generally is indisputable. In fact it is
followed the instructions on for this reason that it is also
meditation given in the adopted by some non-Buddhist
Visuddhimagga of Buddhaghosa schemes such as Hinduism and
which was composed in that "transcendental meditation". But
country. Where meditation has its use as a method of achieving
been used as the principal focus insight into reality it may be
in Sri Lanka it has been questioned. True insight comes
practised by reclusive forest only we understand that the
monks with little contact with three signata underlie all
the rest of the Bhikkhu-sangha phenomena. In meditation one may
or the laity. The country from come to the realise this within
where stylised meditation was in the ambit of ones own
introduced into the West is experience, but it will not lead
Thailand. Here the "forest" one understand the universality
orders have enjoyed much more of these traits. Thus meditation
status than elsewhere. They tend has to be supplemented by other
to look on stylised meditation methods such as the first two
as the key to the entire components of the Buddhist path.
Buddhist practice including the
The classic discourse on which
achievement of wisdom and
the theory of meditation is
morality. This system attaches
based is the Satipahāna Sutta,
much importance to the jhānas
which occurs twice in the Canon.
which is considered almost
Here the Buddha identifies four
indispensable to enlightenment.
methods (or foundations) of
There is little attempt at
meditation. These are the
sutta-study except those
contemplation of the body
relating to meditation. While
(kāyānupassanā), of feeling
this kind of meditation may suit
(vedanānupassanā), of the mind
the lifestyle of forest monks it
(cittānupassanā) and finally
is their importation into the
that of the dhammas
general community, especially of
(dhammānupassanā). Some
lay persons, that is
preconditions are laid down in
questionable. If the Sri Lankan
the Sutta before these
and Thai modes of meditation can
contemplations are attempted.
be taken as occupying two ends
One is that the practitioner
of a spectrum the meditation
should have "overcome in this
practice of Burma occupies an
world covetousness and
intermediate position. Here
discontent" (vineyya loke
meditation is taken more
abhijjā domanassa). In the case
seriously than in the Sri Lankan
of lay persons this does not
tradition but some of the
require complete withdrawal from
excesses of the Thai forest
the world, but the development
tradition are avoided(18) . of a sufficient degree of
Buddhist meditation of whatever detachment from it. The
type takes two principal forms - Satipahāna cannot be attempted
the cultivation of calm and by those completely given to
tranquillity (samatha bhāvanā) greed. The second is that the
and the cultivation of insight contemplations should be done in
(vipassanā bhāvanā). The an empty room (suññāgāra) or if
efficacy of meditation in outdoors at the root of a tree.
promoting calm and tranquillity This rules out the
congregational sessions in which training. It could be used to
stylised meditation takes place. calm the mind, to instil
tranquillity, and to set the
The contemplation of the body,
stage for the realisation of
with the initial focus on the
true insight. In fact
breath, is the initial
fascination with meditation can
contemplation that is taught by
be a distraction from the true
most teachers. The Buddha used
path. A capable exponent of
it purely as the starting point
early Buddhism David Maurice
of his sequence of
puts this quite well: "There is
contemplations, and he even
meditation at the very beginning
recommends the "lotus position"
of the practice but the practice
in which to undertake the
is to get away from meditation"
contemplations, which is a (20) .
classic yogic stance. The Buddha
extended the traditional Vedic Even though stylised meditation
meditation concerns by extending may not be necessary it is
the contemplation to other necessarily harmful. It could
physical postures and awareness suit the temperament of some
of other bodily actions, and people, especially those who
finally to the contemplation of desire a strict discipline. On
the foulness of the body. The the other hand what we have
progress of the meditation from termed Buddhist meditation is
the body to feelings is also something that anyone can do
relatively easy for many with profit. It may not lead to
practitioners. The next stage of the final goal in itself, but it
the contemplation of the mind is could be a great help in the
relatively more difficult. The fulfilment of the other
objective here is to achieve components of the path.
one-pointedness of mind. This is Go to Contents
relatively difficult because of
the propensity of the mind to
shift quite fast.
The last one requires
contemplation of the Dhammas. In
the Buddha's time when the
corpus of dhamma was memorised,
this contemplation was the only
way of acquiring the knowledge
of the dhamma. Today the
situation is somewhat different
and this particular foundation
of mindfulness could be acquired
by discursive study.
The view that the awakening of
wisdom can only come through
intense meditation is not only
found in schools like Zen but is
also held by some teachers of
Theravāda(19) . However
meditation in Buddhism is
primarily a method of mental
CHAPTER 6
The Buddhist Attitude to God
It is first of all necessary to
establish what is meant by the
term "God". This term is used to
designate a Supreme Being
endowed with the qualities of
omnipotence and omniscience, who
is the creator of the universe
with all its contents, and the
chief law-giver for humans. God
is generally considered as being
concerned with the welfare of
his human creatures, and the
ultimate salvation of those who
follow his dictates. God is
therefore a person of some kind,
and the question whether such an
entity exists or not is
fundamental to all theistic
systems.
In contrast to this notion of a
personal God some modern
theologians have interpreted the
term "God" as representing some
kind of abstract principle of
good (or "ground of being").
This view was first developed in
the ancient Indian Upanishads
where God is equated with an
abstract principle (Brahman).
The ancient Indian philosophers
could entertain such a view
because they also had a theory
of karma which really does away
with the need for a personal
God. Buddhists too have a theory
of karma, which is different
from that of the Hindus, and
which even more unequivocally
dispenses with the need for a
Deity. The use of the term "God'
to denote an abstract reality by
monotheistic theologians who
have no theory of karma is
difficult to justify; one
suspects that this is merely a
device to explain away the
contradictions that arise from
the notion of a personal God. In Father of all that is and will
fact the actual practice of be." (Dgha Nikya, II, 263).
theistic religion proceeds as if
The Buddha dismisses all these
God is a real person of some
claims of Mahā Brahmā as being
kind or other.
due to his own delusions brought
Just as Buddhism rejects the about by ignorance. Mahā-Brahmā
notion of a Supreme God it also is seen simply a deva
rejects the notion of an unenlightened and subject to the
abstract God-principle operating samsric process as determined by
in the universe. The notion of his kamma (cf the Brahmajla and
Brahman (in the neuter) is not the Aggañña Suttas). In the
discussed at all in the Buddhist Khevadda Sutta he is forced to
texts, and even in India it may admit to an inquiring monk that
well be a post-Buddhist he is unable to answer a
development resulting from the question that is posed to him,
attempt to reconcile the belief and advises the monk to consult
in God(s) with the powerful the Buddha. This clearly shows
critique of the Buddha. It is the Brahm acknowledges the
therefore the attitude of superiority of the Buddha.
Buddhism to the notion of a
In the West a number of
supreme personal God animating
"arguments" have been adduced to
the Universe that we must
prove or disprove the existence
consider.
of God. Some of these were
One popular misconception of anticipated by the Buddha. One
Buddhism must be dismissed at of the most popular is the
this point. This is view that "first cause" argument according
the Buddha is some kind of God to which everything must have a
figure. In the Theravada cause, and God is considered the
tradition the Buddha is regarded first cause of the Universe. The
as a supremely enlightened human Buddhist theory of causation
teacher who has come to his last says that every thing must have
birth in samsra (the Buddhist preconditions for its existence,
cycle of existence). Even and this law must also extend to
Mahayana traditions which tend "God" should such an entity
to think in terms of exist. But while the "first
transcendental Buddhas do not cause" claims that God creates
directly make a claim for Buddha everything, it exempts God from
as God. Thus the Buddha cannot the ambit of this law. However
be considered as playing a God- if exemptions are made with
like role in Buddhism. respect to God such exemptions
could be made with respect to
In the Buddhist texts Mahā
other things also hereby
Brahmā is the equivalent of God
contradicting the principle of
and is represented as claiming
the first cause.
the following attributes for
himself: "I am Brahmā, the Great But the argument which the
Brahmā, the Supreme One, the Buddha most frequently uses is
Mighty, the All-seeing, the what is now called the "argument
Ruler, the Lord of all, the from evil" which in the Buddhist
Maker, the Creator, the Chief of sense could be stated as the
all appointing to each his argument from dukkha (suffering
place, the Ancient of days, the or unsatisfactoriness). This
states that the empirical fact omniscient being who is also all
of the existence of dukkha good. The following verses from
cannot be reconciled with the the Bhûridatta Jataka bring this
existence of an omnipotent and out clearly:
If the creator of the world sace hi so issaro
entire sabbaloke
They call God, of every being be Brahmā bahûbhûtapati
the Lord pajāna
Why does he order such ki sabbaloke
misfortune vidahîalakkhi
And not create happiness but ki sabbaloka na sukhi
only discord? akāsi
If the creator of the world sace hi so issaro
entire sabbaloke
They call God, of every being be Brahmā bahûbhûtapati
the Lord pajāna
Why prevail deceit, lies and
māyāmusāvajjamadena c'api
ignorance
And he such inequity and loka adhammena
injustice create? kimatthaksi
If the creator of the world sace hi so issaro
entire sabbaloke
they call God, of every being be Brahmā bahûbhûtapati
the Lord pajāna
Then an evil master is he, (O
adhammiyo bhûtapatî Ariha
Aritta)
Knowing what's right did let dhamme satî yo vidahi
wrong prevail! adhamma
[Translated by the Author]
The Buddha argues that the three of Buddhism which has sometimes
most commonly given attributes of been described as a psychological
God, viz. omnipotence, system. Given the meaning
omniscience and benevolence normally attached to Psychology
towards humanity cannot all be this is too narrow a description
mutually compatible with the of psychology. Buddhism deals
existential fact of dukkha.(21)Go with many other matters which are
to Contents not normally included in
psychology.
But there is a psychological
CHAPTER 7
dimension to Buddhism. This is
The Buddhist Attitude to Man because of the great concern
which Buddhism has with the mind
In considering the Buddhist view
and with the training of the
of man we are essentially looking
mind. In this sense Buddhism is
at the psychological postulates
unique amongst the world aphorisms the Dhammapada sums up
religions. The first stanza of very well the primacy that
the well-known book of Buddhist Buddhism gives to the mind:
monopubbagamā dhammā similar to the system
manosehā manomayā advocated in the old
manasā ce paduhena Vedas(22) . Instead the
bhāsati vā karoti vā Buddha identified five
Tato na dukkhamanvet constituents of the
cakka va vahato pada empirical person, the
first of which (rûpa) was
Mind is the forerunner of physical and the last
all states, mind-based four (collectively called
and mind-made are they nāma) were mind
components. These five
If one speaks or acts components have been
with an evil mind called Groups of
existence or Five
Suffering results, just Aggregates
as the wagon wheel (pañcakkhandā). These
follows the ox drawing it are:
Similarly good thoughts
lead to good actions. 1. Corporeality (rûpa).
This is the physical
Most religious systems basis of existence. The
decompose the individual five sense organs (eye,
into a body and a soul. ear, nose, tongue and
In this division the body body) are especially
includes what Buddhists important in generating
(and modern the various signals which
psychologists) would are processed by the mind
regard as the mind. Very (which is also recognised
often in this scheme the as an organ in is own
mind is located in the right).
heart. There is no
location given for the 2. Feeling (vedanā).
soul. It is in fact a Feelings are a by-product
mysterious entity created of the contact between
by God. While the the organs of the
physical body perishes at physical body and the
death the soul goes external world. They are
either to Heaven or to classified in various
Hell where it is reunited ways - wholesome and
with a body (perhaps unwholesome, gross and
similar to the old one) subtle, painful and
and continues its pailful, etc.
existence as one of
sensuous conform or of 3. Perception (saññā).
torment depending on the This is how the mind
destination. processes the feelings
that its sense organs
The Buddha dispensed with transmit. No two
this scheme which was individuals have the same
perception of the same
feelings they may
experience.
4. Formations (sankhārā).
The formations are the
deliberative acts of the
individuals. it is often
referred to as karmic
formations.
5. Consciousness
(viññāna). This is the
condition of being aware
of the environment in
which the individual
exists.
While corporeality is
readily understood the
other four components are
more subtle. Three of
these, viz. feeling,
perception and
consciousness, are known
to modern psychological
science, and the Buddhist
interpretation does not
differ substantially from
the scientific one. But
the concept of
"formations" is not known
to modern psychology. At
the same time there is
nothing in conventional
psychology that denies
its existence. Here the
Buddhist view transcends
that of the conventional
analysis of mental
components. Go to
Contents
or because of its
methods, or in
CHAPTER 8 consideration of
plausible reasoning, or
Knowledge, Wisdom and by tolerating views based
Enlightenment on speculation, or
because of its appearance
The Buddha traced the of its possibility and
root cause of suffering because `your teacher is
to ignorance; so the venerable'. But when you,
search for enlightenment Kālāmas, realize by
is the supreme activity yourself that views are
for the Buddhist (23). The unwholesome, faulty,
activity proceeds at both condemned by the wise,
the intellectual and the and that they lead to
intuitive levels. Pure harm and misery when
intellectual practised and observed,
understanding is not then Kālāmas, you should
sufficient, although it reject them"
is often a very good
starting point. When This is the criterion of
enlightenment is attained acceptability which the
pure intellectual Buddha wanted to apply to
understanding is all claims, including his
transcended by an own. In Buddhism there
intuitive grasp of the cannot be room for blind
truths of the Universe. faith, and all
propositions, religious
If knowledge is the or otherwise should be
outcome of "intellectual" subjected to analysis and
activity, a person's fund practice. The reference
of knowledge at any to "mere logic" and
moment of time is made up "plausible reasoning" in
of a number of beliefs the quotation given
that he considers valid. serves as a caution
The Buddha was quite concerning some extreme
clear on what he forms of "rationalism"
considered legitimate to which argue that "pure
believe in. In his reason" is sufficient to
discourse to the Kālāmas establish the truth of
(a people who were metaphysical propositions
confused by the diversity (like that of the
of viewpoints they were existence of God).
confronted with) the Deductive methods are
Buddha said: useful, but as they can
only bring out what is
"Come, O Kālāmas, do not already contained in the
accept anything from mere premises of the argument,
hearsay, or from what you they cannot be used as a
have been told, or vehicle for the discovery
because it is mentioned of new truths. Rightly
in sacred teachings, or has the Kālāmasutta been
because of logic merely,
termed the Buddhist useful, and is not
charter of free enquiry. discouraged; but it alone
will not lead to
As a result of the enlightenment. This is
Buddha's rational and clearly seen in the case
tolerant attitude early of many eminent
Buddhism never had scientists, who have
concepts like heresy, progressed far in the
apostasy and blasphemy acquisition of particular
(and this is true of all kinds of knowledge, but
subsequent Buddhist have not been able to
schools). In many outgrow the dogmatic
theistic systems views inculcated in early
imprisonment, torture and childhood.
death have been inflicted
on people who have P>True enlightenment can
refused to bow before arise out of the third
dogma. kind of knowledge,
consisting of wisdom
In Buddhist epistemology (bodhi) and insight
three levels of (vipassanā). This results
understanding are from the intuitive
recognised. These are realisation of the
(using the Pali Buddhist laws and truths
terminology): dii after the successful
("views"), ñāna traverse of the Middle
("science"), and bodhi Path. The enlightenment
("wisdom"). Dii refers to process involves the
views accepted more or breaking of the ten
less dogmatically. Not fetters (sayojanā) that
all such beliefs are bind people to the
necessarily harmful, phenomenal world. These
because some people could are the five lower
be motivated to act fetters of personality
wholesomely even though belief, sceptical doubt,
motivated by incorrect clinging to rite and
views. But more usually ritual, sensuous craving
such "views" can be and ill-will, and the
extremely harmful(24) . five higher fetters of
The Buddha did not craving for "fine
consider knowledge material" existence,
consisting of dii to be craving for "immaterial
useful in the longer existence", conceit,
term. Dii is often restlessness, and
contrasted with ignorance. (25)
scientifically based Go to Contents
knowledge, which results
from thinking, from
learning and from mental
development. This is
usually terms ñāna or
paññā. The acquisition of
this kind of knowledge is
mental factors which
accompany the commission
CHAPTER 9 of deed that determines
its consequences or
The Doctrines of Karma "fruits" (vipāka). All
and Rebirth negative kamma (i.e.
those leading to bad
The Buddhist doctrine of consequences) arise from
kamma [karma] ("deeds", the three roots of
"actions"), and the unwholesomeness. These
closely related doctrine are greed (lobha),
of rebirth, are perhaps aversion (dosa), and
the best known, and often delusion (moha).
the least understood, of Accordingly good kammic
Buddhist doctrines. The results follow from deeds
matter is complicated by that spring from
the fact that the other generosity (caga),
Indian religious loving-kindness (mettā)
traditions of Hinduism and wisdom (vijjā). The
and Jainism have their Buddha emphasised that it
own theories of Karma and is the mental factors
Reincarnation. It is in involved, rather than the
fact the Hindu versions deeds themselves, that
that are better known in determine future
the West. The Buddhist consequences. Thus the
theory of kamma (to give same deed committed with
the Pali word) and different mental factors
rebirth are quite will have different
distinct from their other consequences. Likewise
Indian counterparts. purely accidental deeds
may have neutral
In Buddhism the law of consequences; however if
kamma is the moral law of the accident occurred
causation - good actions because insufficient
give good results and mindfulness was exercised
vice versa. It is the it could have adverse
quality of an act which results for the person
determines its responsible for it.
consequences. But what
determines the karmic The theory of kamma
quality of a deed? In presupposes that
Hinduism it is the individuals have "free
correct performance of a will". Everything that
person's "duty", happens to an individual
especially his caste is not the fruit of some
duties that counts. Early past kamma. In fact the
Buddhism, which experiences that involve
recognised no caste an individual may be of
distinctions, evaluates three kinds: some are the
the karmic quality of an result of past action,
act in terms of moral and some are deliberately
ethical criteria. In committed free acts; and
particular it is the the remainder could be
due to chance factors newly born individual
operating in the needs not only the
environment. The doctrine genetic blueprint derived
of kamma is not a theory from the genes of the
of predestination of any natural parents, but also
kind. One common a kammic blueprint
misunderstanding is not derived from the
to distinguish between volitional acts of a
the action and its deceased person.
results - between kamma
and vipāka. It must also The question has been
be mentioned that the posed whether the new
fruiting of an act may be individual is the same as
postponed, and that it is the old individual whose
possible to reach kamma it has inherited.
enlightenment - the goal The Buddha's answer to
of the Buddha's path - this question was
before all the previous somewhat enigmatic: "It
kammas have yielded their is not the same, yet it
results. is not another" (na ca
so, na ca añño). To
The Buddhist theory of understand the Buddha's
rebirth asserts that the reply we have to
fruits of some kamma may investigate the criteria
manifest themselves in which establish personal
"future lives". This identity. Is the child
brings us to the Buddhist the same as the adult it
theory of rebirth. later becomes? In the
Similar concepts occur in Buddhist sense we are
other religious systems - making two observations
e.g. the Platonic theory at two points of time in
of the "pre-existence of a constantly changing
the soul" and the Hindu- psycho-physical entity.
Jain theory of re- For legal and
incarnation. Such conventional purposes
reincarnation theory some arbitrary criteria
involves the are used, such as
transmigration of a soul. physical continuity over
In Buddhism, however, it time, or the retention of
is the unripened karmic memory. These define only
acts outstanding at the a conventional person.
death of an individual Just as it is a
which conditions a new conventional or
birth. The last moment of "fictional" persons who
consciousness too is also lasts continuously from
a conditioning factor, birth to death, so it is
but it is the store of just such a conventional
unripened kamma generated person who persists from
by volitional acts (the one life to another. In
sankhāras) of previous the Buddhist view of
existences which rebirth the only links
generates the destiny of between two successive
the new individual. A lives is the karmic
residue carried over and lives, whether
an element of spontaneously or under
consciousness, called the hypnosis, which have been
re-linking consciousness: reported from all parts
(paisandhi viññāna), of the world. While many
which momentarily links such reports may be
the two lives. In mistaken or even
Buddhism there is no fraudulent, some are
conception of a undoubtedly genuine.
transmigrating soul which According to Buddhism
inhabits successive individuals can develop
material bodies until it the power of
unites with God. "retrocognition" (i.e.
the ability to recall
Buddhism uses the Pali past lives), but the
term sasāra to denote the development of such
"round of births" in supernormal powers is
various planes of usually the accompaniment
existence governed by the of progress along the
law of kamma. The spiritual path of
acceptance of the enlightenment. IT may be
validity of the possible that some karmic
hypothesis of sasāra is factors may predispose
very difficult for some some individuals towards
people, while for others such experiences. However
it is the most natural of parapsychological
hypotheses. Some features experimentation is still
of the observable world in its early stages, and
suggests it. In the many people have no
Culakammavibhanga Sutta personal recollection of
the Buddha is asked: their own previous lives.
"What is the reason and For such individuals the
the cause for the dogmatic acceptance of
inequality amongst human the doctrines of kamma
beings despite their and rebirth is not
being human?" (the expected.
context making it clear
that it is inequality at The central tenets of
birth that is meant). The Buddhism relate not to
Buddha answered: "Beings any abstract theories
inherit their kamma, and about rebirth or karma
it is kamma which divides but to the interpretation
beings in terms of their of human experience which
inequality". The theistic is within the capacity of
hypothesis cannot give a every person to verify.
rational answer, except This verification can be
in terms of an iniquitous undertaken, not in terms
and unjust "God". of an abstract cycle of
lives, but also in terms
Some support for the of the one life we are
theory of rebirth comes all familiar with. The
from reports of Buddhist sasāra is to be
recollections of past seen in every moment of
existence, as well as the doctrines of karma and
whole "cycle of births". rebirth) would find that
the Buddha-Dhamma would
One would expect that in not have lost its
the Kālāma Sutta, the rationale. He can aspire
discourse in which the to the second confidence
Buddha decries the of the "noble person" and
acceptance of theories on make the one life that he
the basis of authority is sure of, a happy one.
(which was quoted (26)
earlier), that he would Go to Contents
address himself to the
question of belief in the
doctrine of kamma and
rebirth. This he does.
Referring to the "four-
fold confidences" which
the "noble person" (āriya
puggala), i.e. the person
who follows the path of
the Buddha, attains to,
the Buddha states:
Basic Buddhism is
relevant for the problems
of modern society in
several other ways. But
it must be remembered
APPENDICES tatiyam pi For the third
dhammam time I go for
Appendix A: On Becoming a saranam refuge in the
Buddhist gaccāmi Dhamma.
tatiyam pi For the third
It is possible for a sangam time I go for
person to live as a lay saranam refuge to the
Buddhist without any gaccāmi Sangha
formal ceremony, This need not be a public
declaration or rite. utterance, but could be a
However the traditional self-administered
formality associated with declaration. The person
identifying oneself as a making this choice should
Buddhist is to recite the have a clear
formula of Going to the understanding of what the
Threefold Refuge Dhamma of the Buddha is.
(tisarana gamana) (32) This booklet is meant to
This involves the formal provide such an
utterance of the understanding.
following statements with
full understanding as to Buddhists repeat this
their import: formula periodically, as
occasion permits, in
> order to re-dedicate
buddham I go for themselves to the
saranam refuge to the Buddhist goal.
gaccāmi Buddha
dhammam I go for Appendix B: The Five
saranam refuge to the Precepts
gaccāmi Dhamma
sangam I go for The Going for Refuge
saranam refuge to the formula is very often
followed by the formula
gaccāmi Sangha (33)
of Taking of the Five
Precepts (pañca sîla).
dutiyam pi For the These precepts constitute
buddham second time I the basic ethical norms
saranam go for refuge Buddhists hope to follow,
gaccāmi to the Buddha i.e. forms the layman's
dutiyam pi For the code of conduct. They
dhammam second time I define the ethical rules
saranam go for refuge which a lay Buddhist must
gaccāmi to the Dhamma follow in daily life.
dutiyam pi For the They are not commandments
sangam second time I but "rules of training"
saranam go for refuge (sikkhāpada). It is
gaccāmi to the Sangha customary to formally
state these rules either
daily or on formal
tatiyam pi For the third occasions but it is not
buddham time I go for the recitation of the
saranam refuge in the rules that matter but
gaccāmi Buddha their observance. In many
Buddhist countries the abstaining from sexual
precepts are wrongdoing). Misconduct
"administered" formally here means not only overt
by monks, but this is not acts of sexual violence
necessary. like rape, but also
adultery in general. It
In the following we give must be remembered that
the precept in Pali, its Buddhism does not endorse
approximate translation, any particular kind of
and a few explanatory marriage, so this precept
comments: requires that sexual
relations should be
1. Non-Destruction of confined to what is
life. pānātipāthā socially and legally
veramanî sikkhā pada acceptable as a marriage
samādiyāmi (I agree to relationship.
follow the precept of
abstaining from the 4. Abstention from Wrong
taking of life). This Speech. musāvādā veramanî
involves not contributing sikkhā pada samādiyāmi (I
to the death of any agree to follow the
living being. This means precept of abstaining
not only the actual from wrong speech). Wrong
killing but also "causing speech involves a great
to kill". However this many things apart from
rule does not require one uttering falsehoods. It
to be a vegetarian, only includes insulting
that meat consumed should speech, malicious speech,
not have been "specially even gossip.
killed" for direct,
personal consumption. 5. Refraining from
Meat purchased in the Intoxicants. surāmeraya
market does not come majja pamā dahānā
under the "specially veramanî sikkhā pada
killed" category. samādiyāmi (I agree to
follow the precept of
2. Abstention from Theft. abstaining from the
adinnādānā veramanî liquor and spirits that
sikkhā pada samādiyāmi (I cause inattention). This
agree to follow the is generally taken to
precept of not taking mean avoiding alcohol,
that which is not given). drugs, etc. which tend to
Theft is interpreted "confuse the mind". Some
widely as taking that people interpret this
which is not given. It precept not as an
includes fraudulent absolute prohibition of
behaviour generally. alcohol (as in Islam) but
only against intoxication
3. Avoidance of Sexual and inebriation through
Misconduct. kāmesu the use of alcohol or
miccācārā veramanî sikkhā drugs.
pada samādiyāmi (I agree
to follow the precept of
While the five precepts the eight precepts. These
are usually stated in two additional precepts
negative terms they have are:
their positive
counterparts (e.g. the 9. Abstaining from
principles of non-injury luxurious beds
and loving-kindness,
honesty, sexual 10. Abstaining from
propriety, truthfulness accepting gold and silver
and sobriety.
The third precept is also
Appendix C: Higher expanded to a rule
Precepts and Meditation enjoining chastity.