Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

Article from Fluent News • Summer 2005

ACOUSTICS
EACC 2005

A Sound Method
Velocity (left) and pressure (right) contours on the mid-plane of the radiator fan

for Fan Modeling


D
By Jonghyun Park, Applied Technology Research Department, Hyundai MOBIS, Korea

URING THE DEVELOPMENT of a new car, porous media was used to represent the heat
module designs are commonly used to simplify exchanger. Using characteristic curves for the
the manufacturing process and minimize prob- pressure drop vs. velocity, viscous and inertial loss
lems occurring during the assembly of compo- coefficients were calculated and then used in the
nents. A Front End Module (FEM) is one such numerical simulation as boundary conditions.
automotive component consisting of a cooling
module (condenser, radiator, fan, and shroud), The computational domain consisted of a rota-
headlamp, bumper, and carrier. The cooling tional zone containing the radiator fan, and large
module is a core part of the FEM because of its stationary zones elsewhere. For steady-state sim-
role in the air conditioning and engine cooling ulations, the multiple reference frames (MRF)

Geometry of the FEM cooling fans and shroud


systems. The acoustic performance of the cooling model was used, and for unsteady simulations,
fan is important as well, when considering the sliding mesh model was used. Two partition
human sensitivity to noise. walls at the front and rear faces of the radiator
were used so that air is drawn into the radiator
The component that was expected to be the fan through the heat exchanger. Beyond the fan
main noise source in the FEM consists of a radia- and shroud region, the computational domain

radiator HX
tor fan and a cooling fan, both enclosed in a was extended upstream and downstream to min-
condenser HX
fan & shroud
shroud. The present work considered only the imize edge effects. A pressure boundary condi-
radiator fan operating with the condenser fan tion was applied to both the inlet and outlet
fixed. Condenser and radiator heat exchangers boundaries. A gauge pressure of zero was applied
were included in the simulation, although the at the outlet, and a suitable value was determined
radiator heat exchanger tank was not. Three- for the inlet. Stationary side walls were used with
dimensional laser scanning equipment was used a no-slip condition to minimize the wall interfer-
to obtain a digital model of the radiator fan. From ence effect. The turbulent nature of the flow was
the laser scanner, a cloud of points with the coor- incorporated through the standard k-¡ model.
dinates of the external surface of the fan blade Since the first objective of the study was to set up
wall wall was generated. The resulting geometry was used a process for aeroacoustic simulations of FEM
to build a hybrid mesh of about 2 million cells. cooling fans, the more costly large eddy simula-
Close-up view of the cooling module The rotation speed of the fan was set at 1875 tion (LES) or detached eddy simulation (DES)
rpm. This speed was chosen so that the period of models were not used. These models will be con-
one blade passing would be about 4ms for con- sidered separately in the future, however.
venience of checking the simulation results. A

s6 Fluent News · Summer 2005 © ANSYS, Inc. 2005 - 2009. All rights reserved.
www.ansys.com
Article from Fluent News • SACOUSTICS
ummer 2005

EACC 2005
The CFD simulation process began with a steady launched. During this stage, the oscillations in pressure level (SPL) suggests that the dominant
flow analysis using MRF. Using the preliminary the monitored variables had a period of about 4 mode occurs at 250 Hz, which corresponds to
results, an unsteady calculation was then per- ms, which is equal to that of blade passing in the the blade passing frequency. Other peaks in the
formed using a sliding mesh. During the radiator fan. spectrum are due to interference between the
unsteady calculation, oscillating values of pres- rotating blades and shroud. The overall SPL value
sure and velocity at several monitoring points Starting 40 ms after the start of the unsteady cal- calculated from the CFD simulation is 60.0 dB. 

References:
located behind the rotating fan were checked. culation, the aeroacoustic calculation was begun.
Because of passing fan blades, the periodic time The fan and shroud were treated as the main
histories of pressure and velocity values were noise source and a point 1 m upstream from the 1 Henner, M.; Levasseur, A.; Moreau, S. Detailed CFD
used to indicate when the unsteady flow calcula- center of the radiator fan hub was specified as the Modeling of Engine Cooling Fan Systems Airflow;
SAE 2003-01-0615, March 2003.
tion was fully-developed. Only after this stage receiver. This is a common location for micro-
2 Nashimoto, A.; Akuto, T.; Nagase, Y.; Fujisawa, N.
had been reached was an unsteady acoustic phones in a test setup. Data acquired from this
Aerodynamic Noise Reduction by Use of a Cooling
analysis performed. receiver point was used to compute sound pres- Fan with Winglets; SAE 2003-01-0531, March 2003.
sure fluctuations. These fluctuations, with a mag-
The unsteady flow results were found to be simi- nitude of about 0.07 Pa, were found to be peri-
lar to actual flow through the fan, with a predict- odic, with a primary period of about 4 ms. This
ed flow rate of approximately 1200 m3/hr. A peri- result indicates that the blade of the radiator fan
odic steady-state condition was reached about is the main contribution to the aeroacoustic char-
10 ms after the unsteady calculation was acteristics of the flow field. A graph of the sound

11.0

10.5
V (m/s)

10.0

9.5

9.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
t (ms)

Time history of velocity fluctuations at the monitoring point

0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
P (Pa)

0.01
0.00
-0.01

Flow pathlines through the radiator fan


-0.02
-0.03
-0.40
40 50 60 70 80 90
t (ms)

Time history of sound pressure fluctuations calculated at the receiver position

60
55
50
45
SPL (dB)

40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Frequency (Hz)

Sound Pressure Level (SPL) prediction graph

Fluent News · Summer 2005 s7


© ANSYS, Inc. 2005 - 2009. All rights reserved.
www.ansys.com

S-ar putea să vă placă și