THAT OLD THING, ART.» Roland Barthes Asalltheengelopeias remind ws a iS ee er, acallection of reflections, consid by ronment reviled by high art the copy return ‘ot proceed fom a simple dni of valu, from ‘regula bitrial impli; as Pl Vary noted new technical meen (here, photography, serge itsvery concep, Repetition isa feature of cular. Imean tat Froman cine ar of clues. Popular or ext European elses Wn {Boman cthiography) acknowledge as mach and daceeeented PP a Forenriegsanning Ty dh inte of themsles hey begin to signify again: hing, ade ool tbe signified, nd thereby the ‘mechanical textare sie cay anit gallop bck. Pop art secksto destroy art juts arte the eounter subject of our rear mpl Hevea appears inthe emphasis on what shouldbeAndy arb porns he Fry cine Phangphy pe Net ‘THE RISE OF ANDY WARHOL Robert Hughes ‘To say that Andy Warhol i famous artiste toute the merest commonplace. Bat what in real objets, which milions of history. Neiman, beeause milo will ake any amount of ib abs able and pert par of jugs. st acfirst hand? Ne "Tomo ofthe people who have smuseumculture, stucktoa memorable fie: cashered Latin eacherin apae fiber wi the guy who paints soup cans and knows all the move sar. To a smaller but iter tional public tof the tray successful socal pores, cimbing from fac to face ina silent delirium of snobbery man so interested lites that he bas his ow aol? What sie of plc ikes his work, or even know Wyeth's or Neiman ——Ee ‘The New York Review of Books, ebony 3988: 620