Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
By all means let us prescribe Nitrous oxide where illness apparently followed
inhalation of the substance, but do not, for one reason or another, t r y to build
it into a constitutional " t y p e " until it becomes as protean in its symptomato-
logy as Sulphur. One of the most important spheres in homceopathic prescrib-
ing is t h a t of prescribing on past history and m a n y examples are to be found in
our literature. 5
I t is common practice to prescribe a nosode where there is a marked family
tendency to a disease, for example, tuberculosis or carcinoma. Again, one must
be careful not to assign to such nosodes the various apparent constitutional
symptoms which disappeared on its exhibition, thus removing the use of
nosodes from the sphere of family history, into that of constitution. These
s y m p t o m s which disappear are secondary to the familial tendency and are the
reaction of the patient to t h a t tendency. I t is only when those pseudo-con-
stitutional symptoms disappear t h a t the true constitutional picture can be
seen. However, it is well worth remembering how the suckling b a b y m a y
require the constitutional remedy of the mother.
Some physicians admit, but privately, to giving a succession of such nosodes
in a chronic case, as they consider that somewhere in the family there is a good
.chance of there having been one or other of the related diseases. I seem to
r e m e m b e r a lady member of the Faculty saying t h a t she automatically gave
Medorrhinum--or was it Lueticum?--to any descendant of a sailor! How far
s h o u l d we go, when we consider the state of civilization of a country can be
judged by the prevalent disease--first leprosy, then yaws, syphilis, tuberculosis,
and now cancer? Nevertheless, prescribing on past and family histories is a facet
o f Homceopathy, the indications for which are basically simple and factual, and
is of particular value when introducing a student to homceopathic prescribing.
So it would appear that we start off with a simple proving which (accurately,
we hope) has other indications tagged on, resulting, in m a n y instances, in com-
]alex pictures. And then what happens? T h e fame of m a n y homceopathic
:physicians lingers on, in m a n y instances on their summaries of ddrug pictures;
their thumbnail sketches; their simplification of ddrug pictures, and I personally
honour them, for I am convinced t h a t in our present state of knowledge of
Homceopathy this (other than reproving the classic remedies) is about the only
field of work available to the clinician in which he can a t t e m p t to simplify
:Homceopathy. Indeed, with reference to even the very limited pictures pre-
sented in the review of provings from 1945-1962 the author did this, when he
said t h a t "part of the object in giving this very brief sketchy outline is to t r y to
give in one word, or in one sentence, a phrase one could remember about each
o f these substances, and therefore know how to use it".
I am, very obviously, convinced that the basic principle is correct. Like does
cure like. However, some of us are still elaborating Homceopathy when,
constantly, we should be simplifying it.
The most successful method of simplification, so far, was the introduction of
repertories. Boerecke's Materia Medica gives 1,414 drug pictures in greater or
lesser detail. Kent's Repertory deals with 529 drugs less than h a l l I f 1,414
drugs are necessary for the most successful practice of Homceopathy, then this
Repertory falls short of necessity. Over the years one studies the prescribing
methods of one's teachers and colleagues and one doubts very much ff any
homceopathie doctor uses more than 250 drugs in his lifetime. Many physicians
s a y t h a t when they repertorize, they are always led to one of some two dozen
well-kn~wn remedies. I f their case-taking is not painstaking and their assess-
HOM(E OPATHIC STOCK-TAKING 177
Such a method would be more widely selective but quicker, and would in no
way eliminate the considered judgement of the physician. I t would also be, I
fear, expensive, but, if a sufficiently great number of physicians still believe
implicitly t h a t past and present provings and the Repertory cannot be improved
on, worth while.
Most of us have heard it said that there is no need to explain Homceopathy,
as its results speak for themselves. This is usually proclaimed with reference to
proving its t r u t h to other physicians, but there are very few young homceopaths
who are satisfied with the present methods and the uncertainties involved.
Over the years we have listened with interest to the Place of Homoeopathy
in (the then) Modern Medicine. But the modern medicine of today is ancient
tomorrow. We have been content to bask in the knowledge that Homceopathy
was, and is, ahead of its time.
I t is of vital importance t h a t we, and our successors, should know how to
prescribe more accurately than b y our present methods. When we do, our
results will certainly speak for themselves.
Would t h a t I could agree with Plato (in his Critias) when he says t h a t the
explanation of these things is not difficult of which we can have experience!!
The only worth-while research carried out by a homceopath for Homoeopathy
was t h a t of the late Dr W. E. Boyd. I t was the endcavour of a working lifetime
to prove scientifically t h a t a homoeopathic potency (involving succussion) had
a form of activity. This he did and published in great detail, s
He showed t h a t Mercuric chloride up to the 32nd centesimal potency
accelerated the hydrolysis of starch with diastase, and that Strophanthus
sarmentosis in the same potencies altered the heart rate of frogs.
H a h n e m a n n put the principle Like cures Like into medical practice.
We know from clinical experience and from the laboratory verification of
Boyd that the homceopathic potency is an active agent.
Who will tell us what this activity is?
Galileo said (The Two Sciences): "for human nature is such that men do not
look with favour upon discoveries--either of truth or fallacy--in their own
field, when made by others than themselves." Most homceopaths have been
content to practise as they had been taught to practise by their more ex-
perienced colleagues, and I feel t h a t we must instigate a search for our answer,
outwith the very limited confines of our faculty.
The first objective in our search must be a greater understanding of succus-
sion. Dr Clive Nicholson 9 referred to physicians in the past who believed that
finally the physicist would tell us. I n considerable detail he spoke of some
aspects of molecular physics which he felt might influence our thinking on
succussion. W h a t in fact does it do? A simple example of succussion is demon-
strated in most school classrooms. A partly filled, closed cylinder of water is
upended in rapid succession when the column of water falls to the bottom of the
cylinder each time and finally a measurable increase in the temperature of the
water takes place. That is, energy is transformed into heat.
I t is known that an atom consists basically of a nucleus which is positively
charged electrically and t h a t the size of this positive charge determines the
number of electrons which constantly orbit round the nucleus. (These electrons
are negatively charged.) Work is required to move electrons farther away from
the nucleus, which work is then stored as increased potential energy of the
whole atom. Given a sufficient amount of energy, an electron can leave its
particular atomic field permanently and so become a free electron. (The rest of
HOMG~ O P A T H I C STOCK-TAKING 179
the atom is left with a positive charge and is called an ion.) These free electrons
and remaining ions move in opposite directions and collide with non ionized
atoms in two ways:
1 I n an "elastic" collision when the target atom takes up extra energy in
kinetic form, i.e. its velocity is increased but its internal structure remains
the same.
or
2 I n an "inelastic" collision when the target atom stores energy in potential
form when one of its electrons jumps to a position farther away from the
nucleus (when the atom becomes "excited" as it is called), and when this
electron requires less energy applied to it to throw it clear from its atomic
nucleus and become "free".
One can visualize such a free electron of a nucleus--of an atom---originally
from a molecule--of a substance to be used as a homceopathic remedy, affecting
the atomic field of a molecule of the solution in which the substance is being
prepared. One begins to realize how the energy imparted b y an outside source
(succussion) is stored in the homceopathic potency as a potential energy of
constant level.
The chemical composition (i.e. the molecular and atomic structure) of the
solute (or "medicine") will determine the degree to which the solvent is affected
b y succussion and therefore different levels of energy are produced by the
differing solutes ("medicines"). I n the same way, one begins to realize how
differing homceopathic potencies can have differing energy levels.
B U T - - i s it possible for the degree of succussion used in the preparation of
homceopathic medicine to set up such a reaction? For instance, when Hofstader
and his collaborators were investigating the nucleus of an atom, they bombarded
atomic nuclei with high-energy electrons, which were accelerated in electric
fields of several hundred million volts, in an instrument weighing some 250 tons.
Even if it is theoretically possible, does any means exist today to measure these
different energy levels? "These experiences which are used to prove a scientific
truth, are, for the most part, artificial experiences of the laboratory, gained
after the truth itself has been conjectured" (William James).
I f any such physical change takes place in homceopathic succussion and it
can be measured, one of the greatest difficulties in homceopathic practice will be
overcome, and that is making a final choice from a group of equally well indi-
cated drugs. And the reason will be t h a t m a n y of our chemically Complicated
remedies will act physically in precisely the same way as each other and produce
the same energy level. (At present, it is believed that each electron is the same
as any other.)
Here then will take place the greatest simplification of Homoeopathy so far,
namely, that m a n y of our well and less well proved drugs will be found to have
the same energy level and that their respective potencies will have the same
energy levels.
At this stage we will have groups of remedies which we will know to possess
the same energy level and their composite maCeria medica will equate with a
measurable energy level. Then a new materia medica would be useful, but it
would probably be shortlived for this, so far, obviously deals with the more
accurate knowledge of the activity of the drugs without reference to the patient.
I t has been obvious for m a n y years that certain illnesses produce a measurable
rise in body temperature and t h a t certain inflammatory states have caused an
increase in local temperature, e.g. furuncles, cellulitis, etc. We know t h a t steps
180 THE BRITISH HOM(EOPATHIC JOURNAL
are being taken to measure the local rise in temperature caused in the body in
some conditions not considered in this way before. Infra-red thermography is
the term used to describe the method employed, for recording an image repro-
duction of the infra-red radiation emitted b y the body surface, as a function of
the skin temperature. Again, this has only become possible because of the recent
developments in electronic components giving sufficiently good resolution with
infra-red wavelengths of limited power. The present camera is the Pyroscan
Mark I I developed by S. Smith & Sons and is sensitive to a radiation wavelength
extending to about 5.5 microns, a micron being a wavelength of 10 -4 cm.
Having in mind the possibility of temperature changes in the production of a
homceopathic potency, the immensity of the problem of measuring this energy
in a simple, practical form, to me, as a layman in the field of physics, is appalling.
You will remember that beyond the range of infra-red waves come successively
light waves, ultra violet waves, x-rays and t h a t the energy of x-rays is equiva-
lent to 40,000 electron volts. One electron volt is the energy required to move
one electron through a potential difference of one volt; which is very small!
I n scientific history there are innumerable instances of hypotheses having to
await the advance of practical scientific method to prove them. This can be
understood, but there are times when observed f a c t s also must so await. For
example in 1898 Camillo Golgi saw tenuous networks of substance when he
examined microscopically the stained brain cells of a barn owl. Over the next
50 years some 2,000 scientific papers argued about it. I n 1945 most leading
scientists pronounced the network a delusion and the flow of papers stopped.
Within two years, the electron microscope demonstrated the reality of the
Golgi network.
The speed with which new discoveries are being made in physics is almost
unbelievable and I will give you one example. Between 1930 and 1960, twenty-
five elementary particles were discovered. I n the single year ~1961, thirty-four
more were discovered. (One of these--the neutrine--is believed to serve only as
an energy carrier in various kinds of transformations.) Many of these particles
travel with the speed of l i g h t - - t h i r t y thousand million centimetres per second
- - a n d since their diameters are about point-twelve noughts-three of a ccnti-
metre, the time they stay in contact in the case of a simple collision and bounc-
ing back would be point-twenty-two noughts-one of a second (George Gamow).
This gives us some idea of the smallness of measurements which are now
possible.
As m o r e sensitive means of measurement are devised, the energy level of the
body and of parts of it will be charted, in health and disease, and be as common-
place as the electrocardiogram and the electroencephalogram. Such a hypothesis
would, ][ think, be acceptable to those of us who believe that the human body
has forces which are similar in nature to those forces contained in the potentized
remedy.
We will then prescribe preparations of drugs of known energy level, on the
symptomatology presenting (noting the local and general energy levels of the
body). Afterwards, the changes of body energy level will be noted and charted,
in relation to the energy level of the drug prescribed successfully. We will have
been able to build up a materia medica which will be a chart of the disturbances
of energy level of the body and the energy level of the homceopathie potency
required, to bring the energy level of the disease back to t h a t of health.
We might well take to heart the words of H a r v e y (Animal Generation) when
he referred to "The age we live in, when men, inclined to idleness, prefer going
HOM(EOPATHIC STOCK-TAKING 181
wrong with many, to becoming wise with the few, through dint of toil and
Outlay of money".
The "outlay of money" is pertinent.
REFERENCES
1 Kennedy, W. P., The Practitioner, January 1963, p. 10.
Brieger, J. E. G., "Does pleasure benefit?", Brit. Horn. J., 50, 57, January 1961.
s Nicholson, B. Clive, "Placebo reactors", Br/t. Horn. J., 52, 143, July 1963.
4 Raesido, J. R., "A review of recent provings", Brit. Horn. J., 51, 188, July 1962.
5 Foubister, D. M., "The significance of past history in homceopathic prescribing", Bri~.
Horn. J., 52, 81, April 1963.
s McCrae, W. R., "A summ~ry of forty years' study of potency energy", Brit. Horn. J., 50,
143, July 1961.
7 Russell, D. C., "The mental symptomatology of Calcium compounds", Brit. Horn. J., 40,
July 1950.
8 Boyd, W. E., "Biochemical and biological evidence of the activity of high potencies",
Brit. Horn. J., 44, 7, January 1954.
Nicholson, B. Clive, "The nature of potency energy", Bri~. Ham. J., 50, 165, July 1961.
DISCUSSION
admired their successes, but noted with interest that invariably their final
prescription was limited to one of twenty well-known remedies. Dr Russell
suggests that few of us in a lifetime ever use more than 250 remedies. I counted
as a matter of interest and find that although I use fewer than I had supposed I
have used well over 300 remedies, though the ones in daily use are far fewer.
I n an a t t e m p t to find an easier and perhaps more accurate way of prescribing
I tried a South American punch card index system. The light shines through the
punch-holes where the remedy has the symptom named on the card in its
proving. I used it for three months and found it completely unsatisfactory.
Polyehrests always turned up, after quite tedious manipulations of the cards.
Dr Russell would like us to simplify further by use of computers. No doubt
this is theoretically feasible and with their ability to be programmed to give
priority to "mentals" and "peculiars" computers would doubtless do better than
select polychrests every time which we could do ourselves without this fan-
tastic expense. But should we emulate the hospitals which are already toying
with "penny-in-the-slot" diagnostic machines of this character?
Dr Russell deprecates proving new drugs "at random". Our provings here
have been carefully planned, are instructive, and although not spectacular
in results are undoubtedly the "life blood" of Homceopathy and do not com-
plicate but widen the usefulness of Homceopathy. I t ' s the repertories that
complicate! I find it difficult to follow Dr Russell's reasoning when he says t h a t
"'exhibition of Sulphur should change a Sulphur type of personality". This is
certainly not m y idea of the function of a deep-acting constitutional remedy.
I have been unable to follow Dr Russell with understanding into the field of
nuclear physics. I understood him to say t h a t several remedies might have the
same or similar energy levels residing in their free unattached electrons,
neutrons or neutrines, and so should be interchangeable yet alike in effect. Is
this correct?
Is the quantity of this energy in a n y way related to the mass of the remedy
or is it a specific quality like a wave rate or a vibration? Or is the energy im-
parted to the inert substance b y succussion? I n this case succussion would
become all important and the remedy of less account?
This emphasis upon "energy" calls to mind the phenomena of radiesthesia,
emanometry, dowsing and the like, which appear to detect energies and locate
them with considerable accuracy. Could this be the same kind of energy?
Personally I think that the answer is more likely to be in the phenomenon of
resonance and tuning in to particular wavelengths.
The fact t h a t people are now thinking in terms of physics instead of chemistry
is in itself a great advance toward the understanding of Homceopathy even
though at present we seem to be still in the realm of speculation and dreams of
the future rather than practical politics, and certainly very far away from
Similia Similibus!
Although he did not say so, I expect that Dr Russell intends t h a t we shall
still after all the simplifications and possibly mechanical computer-like selection
of the remedies give them in little homceolaathic phials and not as radio-
isotopes!
Finally, Dr Russell's stock-taking seems to pinpoint some pitiful inadequacies
in the state of our stock of which m a n y of us are very conscious. Let us hope that
some of us will take up the challenge which this presents.
Thank you again, Dr Russell, for your excellent paper.