Sunteți pe pagina 1din 8

Biomass and Bioenergy Vol. 10, Nos 516,pp.

353-360, 1996
Copyright 0 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
Pergamon Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
0961-9534/96$15.00+ 0.00

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL EFFECTS IN DRYING BIOMASS


FOR ENERGY
T. LIANG, M. A. KHAN and Q. MENG
Biosystems Engineering Department, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, U.S.A.

(Received 1 October 1994; revised 22 September 1995; accepted 10 October 1995)

Abstract-This study evaluates the impact of the moisture content of biomass on thermal efficiency and
relative boiler size which directly represent the economic merits of biomass drying. A model for predicting
the moisture content of bundled Leucaena (Leucocephah) trees under open environment was validated
for tropical Hawaii. Cumulative precipitation and evapotranspiration (ET) are the major factors affecting
the biomass moisture content change. ET was computed using Hargreave’s model, which requires only
temperature and solar radiation data. Integration of these models made it possible to calculate the thermal
efficiency and relative boiler size when using bundled trees as a fuel under a given drying regime and
for a specific geographical location. A geographic information system provided the temperature and
precipitation data required for evaluating the spatial variation in boiler efficiency and size for the 1440
km2 island of Kauai. Depending on the time of harvest, the Leucaena moisture content varied from 35
to 69% (on wet basis) following a period of 6 months of in-field drying. Boiler efficiency using fuelwood
with this range of moisture content varied from 49 to 73%. Boiler relative size varied from 1.2 to 2.2 times
the size required when Leucaena with 0% moisture content is used as a fuel. The spatial and temporal
effects on the value of biomass were thus found to be important factors for various sites in the study area.
The methods for quantifying the merit of biomass moisture management proposed in this paper
demonstrate how GIS modeling can lead to appropriate decision-making capability in bioenergy.
Copyright 0 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Keyword-Drying; biomass; energy; spatial; temporal; GIS; solar; Hawaii; Leucaena.

1. INTRODUCTION moisture range of 25-35%, boiler size increases


1% for 1% of moisture increase. This increase
The moisture in biomass not only reduces the in equipment size implies a significant increase
net useful energy but also increases the size of in capital cost as the moisture of biomass fuel
the equipment required to convert the biomass increases. Biomass moisture also inflicts a
energy into a useful form. Therefore, it is highly similar adverse effect on the gasification process,
desirable to reduce the water content of biomass and increases tar formation. It was reported that
to avoid the waste of energy for vaporizing the the biomass moisture reduces both the qualities
water and the added capital cost to purchase of the gas and the throughput of the gasifier.3
larger boiler or gasifier equipment. Figure 1 Gas heating value drops dramatically when the
shows quantitatively the impact of biomass moisture content of biomass increases. For
water on boiler efficiency and the volume of flue instance, if biomass with 50% moisture content
gas per unit of steam, which is proportional to at harvest is allowed to dry naturally to 30%
the boiler size.‘,’In the high moisture range from moisture, there is a usable heat gain of 1.6 GJ
50 to 60%, the boiler efficiency improves 1% for per tonne of dry-matter produced.4
1% drop of moisture. The magnitude of boiler Realizing the importance of biomass moist-
efficiency improvement decreases to 0.5% for ure, many researchers have conducted exper-
each 1% loss of moisture as biomass moisture iments to find the most economical means to dry
content decreases below 40%. Nevertheless, the biomass. In-field solar drying of biomass
water in biomass still severely affects the boiler requiring little capital and no additional heat
efficiency. The volume of flue gas per unit steam energy input was the most frequently researched
generated is proportional to boiler size. In the method. For example, Rogers’ conducted
mid-range biomass moisture of 40 to 55%, the in-field drying of logging residues for fuel by
boiler size increases 2% for 1% increase in delaying logging residue harvesting or by
moisture in the biomass. Even in the low leaving the residues in the field for three winter
353
354 T. LIANGet al.

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
Moisture content (wet basis), decimal

Fig. 1. Boiler efficiency and volume of gas per unit steam versus biomass moisture content.

months. He found that heartwood moisture January to 30 days per month for June. Hence
content of loblolly pine, white oak and sweet the drying rate for each drying technique varies
gum decreased 50.1, 7.0 and 11.5% from initial by species and drying conditions which vary
moisture contents of 69.8, 71.6 and 118.7% spatially and temporally. In order to accurately
respectively. Comparatively, sapwood moisture evaluate the merit of in-field drying, it is
content decreased 60.1, 23.8 and 28.5% from essential that a methodology be developed to
initial moisture contents of 131.2, 72.7 and estimate the varying drying effect over space and
114.7% respectively for the same species. Net time.
fuel values (GJ/wt tonne) increased 72.5 and
32.9% for loblolly pine sapwood and heart 2. MODELING FELLED TREE MOISTURE
wood, 14.1 and 3.8% for white oak, and 24.5
The most straightforward way for determin-
and 9.2% for sweet gum.
ing felled tree moisture change is to actually dry
McMinn and StubbQ conducted a study
felled trees at all possible combinations of
in which Eucalyptus Grandis trees, felled
time, duration and locations. This approach is
November 15, were dried in-field in both 8 foot
obviously too costly and time consuming. A
bolts stacks and as whole trees with crowns left
drying or moisture prediction model based on
intact for four weeks to determine moisture
environmental conditions would be much more
change. The initial Eucalyptus moisture content
desirable. In other words, a model based on
of 131% at the end of the four week drying
or driven by historic weather data is more
period decreased to 94114% for stacked bolts
practical. Hayhoe and Jackson’s’ model for hay
and to 63-78% for whole tree or transpiration
drying was selected for predicting drying rate or
drying. Clearly the transpirational method had
moisture change of felled Leucaena, a fast
the higher drying rate. McMillen and Wengert’
growing nitrogen fixing tree being considered
reported that the time to dry Eastern hardwood
for short rotation energy tree plantations in
lumber to an average moisture content of 20%
Hawaii and at many other tropical locations.
varies from 45 to 165 days for different regions
The model is simple and is defined as follows:
or locations. The time of year also affects the
drying rate. For example, Riet2 reported that
the effective drying days for the upper midwest aiPEi+biPi+c (1)
of the U.S. varied from 5 days per month for i-1 i=I >
Spatial and temporal effects in drying biomass for energy 355

where: initial moisture content of these trees was


assumed to be approximately 46% (wet basis).
M(t) = moisture at day t for t > 0, % wet
During the 180-day period, the trees cut in the
basis
middle of the rainy season on January 1 initially
t = days after trees felled
lost moisture very slowly. These trees even
MO = initial moisture content at tree fell
increased their moisture content for almost ten
time, % wet basis
days. Those cut on July 1 reduced moisture
a, b = model parameters, mm-’
content more rapidly initially than towards the
c = constant, dimensionless
end of the 180-day period. Although both
C:=, = cumulative value from day 1 to day t
groups of trees reached the target of 15%
PE, = potential evaporation of the ith
moisture content those cut on July 1 reached it
day, mm
after 130 days. The two drying curves in Fig. 2
P, = precipitation of the ith day, mm
indicated that it is necessary to carefully
For estimating potential evapotranspiration consider cutting date and drying period in tree
Giltnane” evaluated many models and con- harvesting scheduling.
cluded that Hargreave’s model provided the The spatial effect on tree drying is also not
best estimate in Hawaii. It is defined (after unit adequately included in tree production manage-
conversion) as follows: ment and planning. The same model was used
to predict moisture changes at two distinctly
PE = 3.214286(T + 17.78)R/(595.5 - 0.55lJ
different locations. Site 1 was located in a dry
(2) region with an annual average precipitation of
where: 100 mm/yr, while site 2 was relatively wet with
an annual average precipitation of 510 mm/yr.
T = average daily temperature, “C
The predicted results, for a specific temporal
R = incident solar radiation, MJ m -2
and spatial weather cycle, are plotted in Fig. 3.
To determine the best values for the The initial moisture of all trees was 46%. The
parameters a and b in the Hayhoe and Jackson’s top two curves are for site 2 and the bottom two
model, whole Leucaena trees were felled and for site 1. The drying characteristics of tree
dried in-field to collect drying data. The trees moisture at the two sites are obviously different.
were planted at a density of 4000 ha - ’and were For a drying period of 30 days or more, trees
harvested when three years old. At harvest the cut in the rainy season of January at site 2
diameter at breast height (DBH) ranged from 5 absorbed water and exhibited no drying at all.
to 15 cm. The data and the best fit Hayhoe For the same period and location, the
model are plotted in Fig. 2 for different seasons July-felled trees lost 10% moisture and hence
of the year. The poor prediction of the model in increased the energy value per tonne of the trees.
the early stages of drying could be due to the With respect to biomass moisture content only,
retention of moisture by foliage for the first few site 1 seemed to be a much better location for
days. However, the model described the data growing energy trees. For selecting desirable
reasonably well for the majority of the drying sites to grow Leucaena as an energy source, the
period. This model was used to determine the curves in Fig. 3 should not be used in isolation.
spatial and temporal effect on drying bundled It is necessary to express all the relevant
whole Leucaena trees in Hawaii. The impact on information, at all sites in a given area, in one
drying is expressed in terms of boiler efficiency place for easy comparison. Mapping the spatial
as well as the boiler size for turning the biomass effect is a promising approach to accomplish
into useful energy. this.

3. TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL EFFECTS IN 4. MAPPING SPATIAL EFFECT


LEUCAENA DRYING
To test this approach, a geographical
The temporal effect on solar drying of information system” was used to not only
biomass is often overlooked in biomass supply the basic data needed to calculate the
production and management. The drying model moisture content of the biomass but also to
described above was used to predict the facilitate the output display. This approach was
moisture history of in-field dried Leucaena trees first applied to a 1440 km2 island (Kauai) in
cut on either January 1 or July 1 (Fig. 2). The Hawaii
_.~ where the final Lucaena moisture
T. LIANG et al.

4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Dayssftercutting

Fig. 2. Model versus experimental data for trees felled 1 July 1990 and 1 January 1991.

content after one month drying was calculated actual drying effects on trees grown and felled
and varied spatially from 35 to 69% (Fig. 4). over the 1440 km2 are displayed in a map
For more than 10% of the land area, in-field (Fig. 5). The drying effects are also presented in
drying increased the moisture of the trees above terms of boiler efficiency (Figs 6 and 7) and
the original 46% when felled in January. Those relative boiler size (Figs 8 and 9). In-field drying
January-felled trees should be transported out impact was more significant for trees felled in
of these growing areas immediately. In-field July being the dry period of the year.
drying will lower the tree moisture content at July results were expected to be similar for the
least 7% on more than 30% of the land. The whole island and hence not presented.

0.60

0.50

T
fi
z 0.40
.%
I
9
!$ 0.30

I
z
z 0.20

B
0.10

0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Days after cutting
Fig. 3. Effect of tree cutting time on biomass drying predicted by model.
Spatial and temporal effects in drying biomass for energy

16

14

12

i 10

B 8
‘6

i6

Final Lucrana moisture (wet basis) after one month drying, decimal

Fig. 4. Area histogram and distribution of final Lucaena moisture content.

Final Luceana Moisture


(wetbasis.kimal)
0.39- 0.42
a 0.42-0.46
3eDl 0.M - 0.50
Noarinlr
possible

Fig. 5. Final Lucaena moisture content for the Island of Kauai, Hawaii.
358 T. LIANGet al.

30 ,..-

25

Fig. 6. Area histogram and distribution of boiler efficiency using trees cut at two different dates.

Boiler Efficiency

Cm cmJari.
la-fielddry
hitill moir

Fig. 7. Boiler efficiency for the island of Kauai, Hawaii for trees cut in January.
Spatial and temporal effects in drying biomass for energy 359

30 --

25 --

1
1 20 --

$ 15 --

e
10 --

5 --

Fig. 8. Area histogram and distribution of boiler size using trees cut at two different dates.

Boiler Relative Size 1

possible

GUIonJan.I
??
??
In-field for P
??
Initial r : 0.5
-

Fig. 9. Boiler relative size for the Island of Kauai, Hawaii for trees cut in January.
360 T. LIANGet al.

5. CONCLUSION University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822


(1994).
The economic significance of the moisture 3. T. B. Reed and A. Das, Handbook of biomass downdraft
gasifiler engine systems, Chap. 3. Solar Energy Research
content of biomass used for fuel is recognized. Institute, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado
Overlooking or inaccurately estimating this 80401-3393 (1988).
4. G. J. Lyons, F. Lunny and H. P. Pollock, A procedure
factor when assessing biomass energy resource
for estimating the value of forest fuels. Biomass 8(4),
could lead to serious economic errors. The 283-300 (1985).
method discussed provides a procedure for 5. K. E. Rogers Preharvesting drying of logging residues.
Forest Prod. J. 31(12), 32-36 (1981).
quantifying this impact. The spatial and
6. J. W. McMinn and J. Stubbs, In-woods drying of
temporal changes on the biomass moisture eucalyptus in southern Florida. Forest Prod. J. 35( l/12),
content were dulv considered. Use of this 65-67 (1985).
7. J. M. McMillen and E. M. Wengert, Drying eastern
method should improve the feasibility analysis
hardwood lumber. Agricultural Handbook 528, USDA
of biomass energy projects. (1978).
8. R. C: Rietz, A calendar for air drying lumber in the
Acknowledgements-This work was partially supported by upper midwest. USDA Forest Service Research Note
the Solar Energy Research Institute (Contract No. 17PLa224, Forest Product Laboratory, Madison,
XN+19164-1) through a grant to the Hawaii Natural Wisconsin (I 972).
Energy Institute administered by the Hawaii Natural 9. H. N. Hayhoe and L. P. Jackson, Weather effects on
Energy Laboratory. hay drying rates. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54,479484 (1974).
10. P. Giltnane, The use of a remote weather station and
canopy temperatures for irrigation scheduling in
REFERENCES Hawaii. MS thesis, Agricultural Engineering Depart-
ment, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu,
1. C. M. Kinoshita, A theoretical analysis of predrying of Hawaii (1987).
solid fuels with flue gas. J. Energy Resources Tech. 110, 11. T. Liang and M. A. Khan, A natural resource
119-123 (1988). information system. Agricultural Systems 21, 81-105
2. C. M. Kinoshita, personal correspondence. HNEI, (1986).

S-ar putea să vă placă și