Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A theoretical study of the use of arrays for the P(k,, k,, f) has been estimated from both long-
analysis of seismic noise fields has been completed. and short-period noise recorded by the Large
The frequency-wavenumber power spectral den- Aperture Seismic Array in Montana. At fre-
sity P(k,, k,, f) is defined and techniques for esti- quencies higher than 0.3 Hz, a compressional
mating it are given. The estimates require that body-wave component which correlates with
the auto- and crosspower spectral densities be atmospheric disturbances over distant oceans has
estimated for all elements in the array. Subject to been detected. In the frequency range of 0.2 and
certain asymptotic properties of these auto- and 0.3 Hz both body waves and higher mode Ray-
crosspower spectral density estimates, expressions leigh waves are observed. At frequencies below
for both the mean and variance of the estimates 0.15 Hz the organized vertical component of
of P(k,, ky,f) have been obtained. It has been de- microseisms consists primarily of fundamental
monstrated that if P(k,,k,,f) is estimated by the mode Rayleigh waves. Appreciable amounts of
Frequency Domain Beamforming Method, then fundamental mode Love wave energy may also be
the estimate has the same stability as the esti- present on horizontal instruments at these low
mates of auto- and crosspower spectral density. frequencies.
i Manuscript received by the Editor June 6, 1968; revisions received October 12, 1968.
* Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, Massachusetts.
** Department of Geology and Geophysics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
21
22 Lacoss et al
sider P(k,, k,, f) to represent the noise power at putational aspects of estimates have been given
frequency f propagating as a plane wave with considerable attention. ‘4s a result, some com-
phase velocity components ments and suggestions relating to this aspect of
Downloaded 09/10/13 to 128.148.252.35. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
stationarity of the seismic noise field. It has been OF NOISE FIELD STRUCTURE
SEISMOMETERS
LOCATED AT (Xi, y,)
sl+=+l--l
-
DELAY T*
BAND-PASS
+- FILTER
CENTERED AT f,
DELAY r3
DELAY r4
s4
P (v,,vy I fo)
xi vx+ YiVy
r, =
(v; + $1
The weights can be chosen quite arbitrarily to P,,,,(f). Note that 8 is real since Pmn(f) = P:,(f)
achieve velocity sensitivity. For example, op- where * denotes complex conjugate. Equation (7)
timum weights yielding maximum likelihood esti- is the basis for the frequency-domainbeamforming
Downloaded 09/10/13 to 128.148.252.35. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
mates of the noise (Capon, Greenfield, and Kolker method (FDBM) Afor the study of seismic noise.
1967) might be used, or all the IV, may be Suppose that Pmn(f) is some reasonable esti-
made equal, resulting in simple delay and sum mate of P,,,%(f) with the property that pmn(f) =
processing. The beam shown is band-pass filtered, P,*,,,(j). Then a reasonable estimateL@(vZ, zb,f), of
squared, and averaged to obtain an estimate of 6(v,, z+,,f) can be defined by using Pm&/) in place
the power at frequency10 which is propagating at of Pmn(f) in equation (7). Now assume that
velocity (tk, ~1~).The final frequency analysis step vZ,z’,, k,, k, andJ are related according to equation
could also be done using the indirect method of (3). We can then define
Blackman and Tukey (1958), using a smoothed
periodogram as described by Jones (1965), or
some other related method, such as the direct
Using equation (7) then gives
segment method suggested by Capon, Greenfield,
and Kolker (1967). In any case, we shall refer to
the above as a time-domain beamforming method
for the analysis of noise.
It is possible to study a noise field using a .exp I -_2a[k,(rc,, - x,)
method which has the same physical and intui-
+ &(Y?Z - Y?n)l). (9)
tive appeal of time-domain beamforming but
which avoids the formation and spectral analysis It is clear that, rather than doing time-domain
of a large number of beams. Such a method, re- beamforming and spectral analysis of each beam,
ferred to as a frequency-domain beamforming one can estimate the P,,(f) and then study the
method (FDBM), is developed below. velocity structure of the noise using equation (9).
Let (X(5:, pi, r) be the autocorrelation function This is the essenceof the FDBM.
Of b(r:, i’y, t) and let Z&(T) be the crosscorrelation It is possible to generalize equation (9) by re-
function between seismometers m and 1~. It placing the product W, W, with a single function
follows iroin equations (4) and (5) that of two indices W,,. Thus
Let cP(o=, ~5,j) and Pmn(f) be the one-dimensional In order to be sure that this &k,, k,,j) is real, we
Fourier transforms of @(v~,v,,~) and Rmn(r), re- assume that W,, = W:,. This general Pfunction
spectively. Thus U’(rr, v,, I) is the power spectral defined by equation (10) has lost any simple
density of h(v,, v,, t) and Pmn(f) is the crosspower relationship to time-domain beamforming. It
spectral density between seismometers m and n. nevertheless can constitute a good estimate of
Taking the one-dimensional Fourier transform of P(k,, k,, f).
equation (6) then gives In the preceding discussion of the FDBM the
weights W, were all real. Thus W,,= W,W,
satisfied the requirement that W,,= Wz,. How-
ever, if the IV, are allowed to be complex, and
there are situations where this is desirable, then
W,,,,= W,,,Wz should be used in equation (10)
in order to satisfy the requirement that P be real.
In subsequent discussions, FDBM will refer to
Thus the power spectral density of b(v,, v,, t) can this slightly generalized situation where the W,
be obtained as a complex weighted sum of the might be complex. The quality and properties of
24 Lacoss et al
In the case of ordinary one-dimensional Fourier rently under study. In our work up to the present
transforms, it is well known that the transform of time we have used the FDBM with UT,,= 1 for all
Downloaded 09/10/13 to 128.148.252.35. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
a product of two functions is the convolution of N. In that case, the wavenumber window function
their transforms. The same property holds for is simply the square of the magnitude of the
higher dimensions.
_ Thus, as a result of equation straight sum beam pattern of the array. The win-
(27), E P(k,, k,, j) is a convolution of the trans- dow functions have been adjusted by choosing
forms (with respect to pz and py) of w(pz, py) and different sets of seismometers available in the
of V(pI, pu,f). The transform of w(pz,pJ is usually Large Aperture Seismic Array (LAS.\) in Mon-
called the spatial window function and is given by tana. Figures 2 and 3 show two short-period
seismometer configurations and wavenumber win-
W(kz,6,) dows which have been used.
ss
cc
The resolution of a wavenumber window func-
=
4P=, PA tion, that is, the size of the region around k,=
-*
k,=O over which W is large, is roughly determined
.esp [--iWk,p, + kupu)]dpzdpu by the spatial extent of the array being used. A
general rule of thumb is that the size of that cen-
=- l5
K? 7?7.?L=l
W,, exp ( --i2~[k,(x, - x,) tral lobe in cycles/km is the inverse of the array
diameter in kilometers. This gives an order of
+ k&n - rm>ll (28) magnitude for the array resolution for an\- reason-
According to equation (24) the two-dimensional able choice of W,,. The window functions shown
transform of V(pz, pu,/) is the one-dimensional in Figures 2 and 3 give some indication of the
convolution of h(f) and P(k,, k,, j). Thus validity of the rule.
It is often possible to obtain a more complete
-@(k,, k,, f) understanding of general expressions by the
sss
00 consideration of simple idealized special cases.
=
W& - kz,E, - k,)h(F,-f) With this in mind the expected value of estimates
--Do have been obtained for completely disorganized
and for completely organized noise. This is done
on the assumption that h, the frequency window
is the theoretical relationship between E j and P. function, is a good approximation to an impulse
This equation demonstrates that E P is related to function. That is, Pmn= Pm,.
P by a three-dimensional window function which
0 SEISMOMETER CONFIGURATION I
is the product of the wavenumber window W and
l SEISMOMETER CONFIGURATION II
the frequency window h. .
If the frequency resolution of the estimates of .
. 0 .
bias in p%,,(f) can be neglected. .
0 0 0
Ideally, one would like W(k,, k,) to act as a two- O . .
0
dimensional impulse function. If it did, then 0 0 O Oo
E ?(k,, k,,f) would equal P(k,, k,,f), on the as- 0 00 O O
0 o. o” .
sumption that h(f) also acts as an impulse func- 0 0
0 0 0
tion. This is not possible. In general, one must be 0 0
satisfied with a W(k,, k,) which is large near 0 0 -xix
0 0
k,= k, =0 and small for all other k,, k, which
000
might be of interest. The choice of seismometer 0
locations and weights W,,,, to yield good window I;IG. 2. Two arm\-s of short-period
functions is an important problem which is cur- verticalSinstruments.
Seismic Noise Structure from Arrays 27
0.1
ifm = II
(30)
otherwise.
7
In this case, e
2 0
f
E&K,, k,,f) = Q(f) 5 IT’,,,,,iK? (31)
ll=l
(43)
and
. {E[L(f)~:“Cf)l- Pmn(fK(f)]
.exp ( -i2r[k,(x, - xm - x, + x,) P,,,P,*, = 2nPW (44)
+ k,(m - ym - yu+ rJ1). (36) Thus
+ Pm,P,** - Pm,P,*u)
Note that if IV,, = W,W$, it follows from equa-
+ i Im ( PLPvn - PLP,, tions (48) and (31) that (E >)z/a2=M for this
spatially disorganized noise. If seismic noise is
- PIT1,,Pm+ PE.PnJ. (41) completely organized in the sense previously dis-
Observe that cussed, then
=- Q"
M
2-
K”
2
,,r,,,=l
w,, times its complex conjugate. But reference to
equation (22) now yields the result
seems appropriate to include one very special where the seismometer numbering is indicated in
example to indicate just how much the stability of Figure -I. The window functions of these two
some good estimators can vary from M. In par- estimators are the same and are proportional to
Downloaded 09/10/13 to 128.148.252.35. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
ticular, we will show estimators with the same the Fourier transform of a set of impulse functions
windo\\- functions which have significantly differ- located on the lag pattern of the regular array
ent stability. and having magnitudes given by the times the
Consider the two linear arrays shown in Figure lag is repeated. The stability for the FDBM
4. Only .r, and k, need be considered in this linear applied to the regular array is, of course, M.
case. The lag patterns show a point for every Direct calculation of the stability of the other
possible .r,-.s, and the number of times that the estimator, assuming noise which is spatially dis-
lag is repeated is also indicated. The nonredun- organized, gives M/3.96. Thus the stability is
dant configuration might be considered in practice worse by a factor of four. One can interpret the
m order to reduce the number of instruments loss of stability as due to the loss of redundancy in
required to complete a noise survey. Sow suppose the lag pattern. Of course, the stability can be in-
that the FDBM with IV,,= 1 is used with the creased by using more time to estimate the P,,,,(f).
regular linear array and the general estimator is It can be shown for a broad class of estimates of
used with the nonredundant array with the three-dimensional frequency-wavenumber
spectrum that the stability depends upon one
[i/l 6 3 1 1
product of two factors, one factor determined b\
the redundancy in time (temporal smoothing) and
one determined by the redundancy of the array
pattern in lag space. Thus, in general, a trade-off
is possible between these factors. If one believes
1234567
. . . . . . .
4Ck---
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 5 4 3 2 l+ TIMES REPEATED
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
-e--
LAG ZERO t
1 2 3 4
. . . .
++3c+/ 2c +
LAG ZERO t
that the noise is spatially stationary, then there AMPLITUDE “I GROUND MOTION
is no special requirement for spatial redundancy ‘8 - AMPLITUDE
and the array designer would deploy his sensors
Downloaded 09/10/13 to 128.148.252.35. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
1
This has no first order effect upon the preceding
.-t;
E
\
analysis but should remove some of the effects of i0
E
seismometer gain variations. As a practical mat- 0
.L
ter, the results of several runs with W,= 1.0 were z
compared with those given with W, modified and E
-
no significant differences were noted. It is worth
noting that with W, given by equation (57) the
E 4.0
largest possible value of&k,, k,J) is unity, and it
2
i
is achieved if the noise is a single plane wave.
j(k,, k,, /) can be interpreted as the percent of 3 1
seismic noise at frequency f which would be
passed by a beam steered to the velocity given by
FREQUENCY ( Hz)
equation (3).
If the W, are constrained by equation (57), PIG. 51,. Instrument characteristics-long-period.
32 Lacoss et al
N N 3-
3-
I I I I
3 2 4 6 6
PERIOD (SW)
FIG. 7. Estimated wavenumberstructure of December
2, 1965short-periodnoisesampleat 0.2 Hz and 0.3 Hz. FIG. 8. Theoretical dispersioncurvesfor LAS.4
Seismic Noise Structure from Arrays 33
Hz. The locus of points corresponding to a hori- Table 1. LASA crustal model
zontal phase velocity of 13.5 km/set has been
Layer
drawn on each of the plots. The presence of noise P-velocity S-velocity Density
Downloaded 09/10/13 to 128.148.252.35. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
thickness
propagating at about that phase velocity from 01(km/set) (3 (km/set) p (gm/cm3)
D (km)
two different directions is clearly indicated by the
0.5 2.0 1.15 2.1
contours of the plots. This high-velocity noise 2.5 3.7 2.10
corresponds to teleseismic P-wave energy. From 19.0 6.1 3.55 ::;t
15.0 7.0 3.90 3.0
the phase velocities and directions given in Figure
13.0 7.6 4.35 3.3
9 it is possible to determine the source areas by 30.0 4.50 3.45
projecting the rays. This has been done for the 20.0 KL 4.54 3.47
60.0 s:os 4.45 3.40
above case and the source regions shown in ‘Ml.0 8.10 4.55 3.49
Figure 10. Both areas are in the oceans, and a 50.0 8.15 4.60 3.50
check of surface weather maps showed atmo- 50.0 8.20 4.65 3.55
m 8.30 4.70 3.60
spheric low pressure systems located at these posi-
tions. This indicates, that at least for this case, P-
wave noise was generated by the coupling of
energy from the atmosphere to the ocean and corresponding to phase velocity of 8 km/set has
then to the crust. been drawn to indicate the clear velocity separa-
Noise structure plots similar to those on Figures tion of the data.
7 and 9 have been obtained for several different In general, more low velocity noise seems to
days and for each tenth of a Hz up to 1 Hz. Figure come from the east than from the west. Kate in
11 shows one way of recording the occurrence of particular the large number of peaks recorded at
noise peaks corresponding to propagation from low velocities for 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 Hz. Figure 12
the two eastern quadrants. The magnitudes of the shows a similar plot obtained for the western two
wavenumbers for any peaks corresponding to quadrants by using the same noise samples. Again
propagation from the east were computed and the separation into two velocity ranges is clear.
plotted versus frequency on the figure. A line Also, the plot indicates fewer occurrences of low
160
Downloaded 09/10/13 to 128.148.252.35. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
75 ~
D5
60--
.
., --
45
307
-..___
I5
FIG. 10. Projection of P-wave raypaths for December 2, 1965 short-period high-velocity noise.
velocity noise from the west than from the east. The directional preference of the low velocity
Xlthough the figure does not show it, it was also noise at relatively high frequencies is probably
true that peaks for noise from the east contained due to the crustal structure rather than to the
more power than those from the west. source of the noise. The crustal structure to the
b
IO- .
0 0 0
ot<.JQ
-I -I 004 0.06
WAVE
I
006
NUMBER
0 IIO
(cycles
I
012
I,,“,)
I
014 .
0 002 004 006
WAVE NUMBER
008 010 012
(cycles /km)
I
014
I
OS
_
FIG. 11. Cumulative frequency-wavenumber plot FIG. 12. Cumulative frequency-wavenumber plot
of microseismic power arriving from the east. of microseismic power arriving from the nest.
Seismic Noise Structure from Arrays 35
.
. .
. .
l .
LPZ SEISMOMETERS
a-
24 NOV 66
NOISE SAMPLE
kp 200 km ~4
frequency (Hz)
FIG. 15. One long-period vertical array used for
E‘IG. 1.3. Typical long-periodpower spectraldensities. noisestudies.
36 Lacoss et al
wavenumber analysis of horizontal components Blackman,R. B., and Tukey, J. W., 1958,The measure-
ment of power spectra from the pomt of view of
has demonstrated that appreciable amounts of communicationsengineering:Bell System Technical
fundamental Love wave energy are also present Journal, v. 38.
Downloaded 09/10/13 to 128.148.252.35. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
at these low frequencies. These results constitute Burg, J. P., 1964, Three-dimensionalfiltering with an
array of seismometers:Geophysics,v. 29, p. 693-713.
very comprehensive data about the mode struc- Capon, J., Greenfield,R. J., and Kolker, R. J., 1967,
ture and composition of the microseisms. They Multidimensional maximum-likelihoodnrocessineof
a Large Aperture SeismicArray: Proc.‘I.E.E.E, ;I
cover a very broad frequency range from 0.04 Hz 55. D. 192-211.
to 0.6 Hz. Capon, J., Greenfield, R. J.,. and Lacoss,R. T., 1967,
In this paper we did not discuss the mechanism Long-periodsignalprocessingresultsfor Large Aper-
ture Seismic Array: M. I. T., Lincoln Laboratory
of generation of microseisms. Our results indicate Technical Note 1967-50.
that the sources of body wave components of Cooley, J. W., and Tukey, J. W., 1965, An algorithm
microseismic noise originated at sea and are asso- for the machinecalculationof complex1:ourierseries:
Math. of Comp., v. 19, p. 297-301.
ciated with storms. We could find no evidence of Douze, E. J., 1967, Short-period seismic noise: Bull.
prominent noise peaks associated with tectonic S. S. A., v. 57, p. 55-81.
Haubrich, R. A., 1966, Semiannual technical summary
regions. Thus the contribution of creep and other -Study of earth notse on land and sea bottom: Uni-
tectonic activities to the microseismic field on a versity of California, Institute of Geophysics and
continuous basis seems to be small, if any. The Planetary Physics, La Jolla, February 11.
- 1967, Array design, semiannual technical sum-
presence of Love wave energy in the long-period mary-study of earth noise on land and sea bottom:
microseisms cannot be explained in terms of University of California, Institute of Geophysics and
conventional hypotheses based on pressure Planetary Physics, La Jolla, July 1.
Jones, R. H., 1965, A re-appraisal of the periodogram
fluctuations at ocean bottom. If we accept the in spectral analysis: Technometrics, v. 7, p. 531-542.
oceanic origin, the Love waves must be produced Pakiser, L. C.., and Steinhart, J. S., 1964, Explosion
seismology m the Western Hemisphere: Research in
by shear forces at the ocean bottom or by Ray-
Geophysics, v. 2, Cambridge, M. I. T. Press, p. 123-
leigh to Love wave conversion due to strong crus- -_-.
16<
tal irregularities along the propagation path. Toksoz, M. N., and Lacoss, R. T., 1968, Microseism:
Mode structure and sources: Science, v. 159, p. 872-
One point about the above results should be 873.
clarified. They apply to LASA and probably to Vinnik, L. P., 1965, The structure of 4-6 second micro-
the interior regions of the continents. At coastal seisms: Dokladi Academia Nauk. v. 162.~. 1041-1044.
1967, Structure of microseismsf LPapers pre-
regions and near great lakes, fundamental mode sented at the Ninth Assembly of the European Seis-
Rayleigh waves may be present at higher fre- mological Commission, August 1966, H. Jensen, Ed.,
Copenhagen.
quencies, provided they can be generated nearby.
Wild, J. P., 1961, Circular aerial arrays for radio astron-
omy: Proc. Roy. Sot. A (GB), v. 262, June, p. 84.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS