Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(((((THESIS)))))
Chapter 1
I. Introduction
In Plato's Concept of the Body and Soul, the soul and the mind is an immortal
being and the body is the mortal which means, the body can die and it is the physical
appearance or the material being of the soul that lies in the body, when the body dies
the soul and the mind leaves the body and will be in the afterlife. According to Plato the
soul and the mind is the thinking being and it can live the without a physical being or the
body.
The soul is like a Remote of the Television, it controls the every action of the T.V.
like decreasing and increasing the sound or changing the channels. Just like the soul,
and analysis of Owen Flanagan. The human body doesn’t have soul,
which contradict scientifically the views of different religion, which state that there
was a spiritual being or soul. A being in a case, a human body doesn’t have a
being that resides in our body, called soul, religion states that a soul is
the soul needed together with the body to be “human” according to Plato.
2. To know the difference between soul without a body and body without a soul
3. To know why science doesn’t support the idea of soul
4. To know what is the reason why science and religion have a conflict about the
desouling person.
CHAPTER II
this detailed picture. First, we will need to demythologize persons by rooting out certain
There are no such things as souls, or nonphysical minds. If such things did exist,
the other. This set of beliefs needs to be replaced. There are no angels,
and does not believe that there is an perennial philosophy, such as souls,
spiritual beings, angels, and god which contradict the belief in religions that said there
1
http://www.greatthoughtstreasury.com/author/owen-flanagan
II. The Problem of The Soul
and threatened by the current revolution in the science of the mind. If the
laws, how can we have free will? If most of our thoughts and impulses are
The Problem of the Soul shows the way out of these seemingly
We are the same. We have a soul in our body based in religion, naturally the science
doesn’t believe in perennial philosophy, because of the unexplained truth about the
soul. Nobody can tell, if there is a soul but it is our belief, that makes us believe that
there is a soul.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/706523.The_Problem_Of_The_Soul_Two_Visions_Of_Mind_And_How_
To_Reconcile_Them
Many thinks that the conflict between the perennial Philosophy and the
scientific image, and specially the resistance the scientific image provoke, lies in our
resistance to materialism, physicalism, naturalism. Call it what you will. The rub comes
from denying two things: what there is, and all There is, is the natural world: and that we
are animals. According to the scientific image, we are conscious animals Living at a
Most traditions-religious, cultural, political, say we are more than animals. This is
not true. What we are usual animals. We have fancy capacities to reflect our own
Motives, intention, behavior, to modify, redirect, and Control ourselves. We are rational
animals and we are animal, that make things – Homo sapiens and Homo faber3
Scientifically we are animals that evolved and in the same time we develop our
intelligent that makes us in the top of the animal kingdom. That intelligent gives us the
right to choose. In religion we are higher than animals but still animals. We can
https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=oXg4DgAAQBAJ&pg=PT13&lpg=PT13&dq=desouling+by+owen+flanagan&
source=bl&ots=1k056oNHR2&sig=peCLXv9NZaClh4fAXebNYYYUWnw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZsZTyn8fdAhVE
v7wKHaK2Bn0Q6AEwBnoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=desouling%20by%20owen%20flanagan&f=false
physically and emotionally adjust the way we think. We develop we have the intelligent