0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
4K vizualizări2 pagini
Assistant Attorney General Blaine D. Gadow, who was to be the Prosecuting Attorney
in the next trial of former ARBCA pastor, Thomas Chantry has filed a motion to dismiss the case!
Titlu original
P1300CR201801308 - 11-13-2019 - MOTION DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE - P-1
Assistant Attorney General Blaine D. Gadow, who was to be the Prosecuting Attorney
in the next trial of former ARBCA pastor, Thomas Chantry has filed a motion to dismiss the case!
Assistant Attorney General Blaine D. Gadow, who was to be the Prosecuting Attorney
in the next trial of former ARBCA pastor, Thomas Chantry has filed a motion to dismiss the case!
SUPER!
AVAPAI EP
MARK BRNOVICH :
Attorney General Wi HOV 13 AM IO 10
Firm Bar No. 14000
BLAINE D. GADOW ae
Assistant Attomey General oy, KMADDEN
State Bar No. 013741 By
2005 N. Central Ave
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-1592
Telephone: 602-542-3881
ermiraud@azag. gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF YAVAPAI
STATE OF ARIZONA, Cause No.: P1300CR201801308
Plaintiff,
STATE’S MOTION TO DISMISS
vs. WITHOUT PREJUDICE
THOMAS JOHN CHANTRY,
Defendant.
The State of Arizona, by and through undersigned counsel, moves this Court to issue at
| $Assianed tothe Honorable Nepper, Div.
Order consistent with the attached Proposed Order dismissing this case without prejudice. Thd
State makes this motion not to avoid any applicable Rule 8 time limits, but rather because dismissal
of this case will best serve the interests of justice when viewed in the totality of circumstances.
‘After lengthy communication and discussion with the listed victim in this matter pursuant t
A.RS.§13-4419 and Article 2, Section 2 (6) and (10) of the Arizona Constitution, and with dud
consideration of the judicial and prosecutorial resources involved in continuing this particulay
prosecution, and with all factors considered in light of the defendant's conviction and sentence int
P1300CR201600966, the State and the victim are convinced that dismissal of this prosecution willSot ost oe ay
12
13
4
15
16
7
18
19
20
21
22
23
4
26
best serve the interests of justice and the victim’s interests as well. ‘The listed victim supports thi
request in direct communication with the undersigned and the investigating case agent.
For those reasons, the State moves to dismiss this case without prejudice as of the date thd
Order is signed by this Court.
The undersigned avows that he has consulted with defense counsel for Thomas Chantry
about this motion, and there is no defense objection to this motion.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this. am day of November, 2019.
‘Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Division
ORIGINAL of the foregoing filed
this_|7¥¢day of November, 2019.
COPY of the foregoing mailed
this (7° day of November, 2019, to:
‘The Honorable John Napper
Yavapai County Superior Court
120 South Cortez Street
Prescott, Arizona 86303
COP Yip the foregoing e-mailed
this [2 day of November, 2019, to:
Ryan Stevens
Griffen & Stevens Law Firm, PLLC
609 N. Humphreys St,
Flagstaff, AZ 86001-3023
stevens @flagstaff-lawyer.com
office@ flagstaff-lawyer.com
Gude | (001)
rr
PSS