Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1 Introduction
Offshore structures like the tension leg platform (TLP) ex- shear stresses and normal stresses or pressures, each of which
perience small-amplitude, high-frequency oscillations in the may follow different scaling laws. For this reason, model test-
vertical mode—the so-called springing vibration (Demirbilek, ing of a complete geosim in a model test basin will not provide
1989). The high-frequency component of the tendon tension useful answers that can be extrapolated to full scale (Couch
is influenced by the heave, pitch, and roll motions of the TLP et al. 1984). Since it is not possible to satisfy all the relevant
hull. Generally, these three hull motions are coupled, and their scaling laws in one test, various common structural shapes are
natural frequencies are close together, A simplified analysis tested separately; see Fig. 1. Based upon engineering necessity,
is performed by considering the heave motion only, see e.g., the most significant quantities are then measured and scaled
Huse (1990), and Chakrabarti and Hanna (1991). The total properly. It is assumed that the total system hydrodynamic
damping of the system in heave is typically small in magnitude. damping can be expressed as the net sum of the individual
Nevertheless, knowing the damping is crucial in determining members, each evaluated separately from the other structural
the resonant response of the structure. Experimental investi- parts. This is clearly an approximation, for all three of the
gation of the damping coefficient is difficult, however, due to foregoing damping components are interrelated and, in gen-
the small magnitude of the damping forces. eral, not independent. However, these interaction effects are
The various components of hydrodynamic damping for bod- expected to be small in magnitude relative to the sum of the
ies such as TLPs are generally due to: 1) time-depending damping contributions from each member treated independ-
boundary layer flows, 2) separation, vortex formation and ently.
shedding, and 3) free surface effects such as wave generation The two main governing parameters for small amplitude
or wave diffraction. These components are influenced by var- oscillatory flow or rigid body vibration of vertical and hori-
ious factors including wall roughness, incident currents, back- zontal cylinders (Figs. 1(b) and (c)) are the Keulegan-Carpenter
ground turbulence, and by the effects of hull motions in other number (i.e., KC) and the frequency parameter (i.e., (3). These
modes. The resultant damping forces are integrations of both are defined as
Contributed by the OMAE Division for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFF- KC = f
SHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received by the OMAE
Division, December 22, 1993; revised manuscript received January 24, 1994. Iff
Associate Technical Editor: A. N. Williams. (1)
Nomenclature
Bh = equivalent linear damping coef- Dv = diameter of vertical cylinder ai = offset of f„-KC curve
ficient for horizontal cylinder Dh = diameter of horizontal cylinder «2 = slope of f„-KC curve
Bv = equivalent linear damping coef- / = frequency of oscillation (Hz) P = dimensionless frequency pa-
ficient for vertical cylinder KC = Keulegen-Carpenter no., 2-KX/ rameter, D2f/v
Cdh = drag coefficient of Morison's D ^ = dynamic viscosity
equation for horizontal cylin- L = length of horizontal cylinder P = water density
der m = mass of cylinder V = kinematic viscosity
Cdv = drag coefficient of Morison's S = frontal area of vertical cylin- CO = circular frequency
equation for vertical cylinder der, 7r£>„2/4 r„ = damping
damping ratio (ratio of system
Cm = inertia coefficient of Morison's T = draft of vertical cylinder to critical damping)
equation u = flow velocity or velocity of of vertical cylinder
D = characteristic body length, typ- body relative to still water f» = damping ratio of horizontal
ically cylinder diameter x - amplitude of oscillation cylinder
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering MAY 1994, Vol. 116/71
Diameter of cylinder
Draft of cylinder
0.457 m (1.5 ft)
1.219 m (4.0 ft) - X
Surface area of water tank 100.5 m x 6.7 m (330 ft x 22 ft)
15 // A
Water depth 3.0 m (10 ft)
Frequency of oscillation 0.41 Hz
Amplitudes of oscillation
KC range
0.25-6.35 cm (011-2.5 in)
0.1-1.0
fi
^c?
•
X
0 89236 </3
10
: y A experiments
their own. In decrement tests, extreme care must be taken to m
ensure that the system damping is properly accounted for. See Y
— friction drag
Chakrabarti and Hanna (1990, 1991) and Bearman (1992). In •A
the case of forced oscillations, straightforward estimation of
damping is extremely unreliable, since the total force is inertia
dominated. Troesch and Kim (1991) conducted damping meas- o— —T—r—T—r- ——
,—
,—
,—
, — , — , — j — , — , —r—i—i—r— i i—i—r—
urements on cylinders in forced oscillation at or near reso- 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
nance. In this case, the restoring forces nearly offset the system
inertia forces. The resulting force measurements give a good KC
Fig. 2 Damping coefficient (B„) for a vertical cylinder versus KC; (1
estimate of the drag coefficients. Different springs were used 89236
to obtain resonances at several frequencies of interest. This
idea of forced oscillation at resonance is used in the present
work. 10
2 Description of Experiments
The experiments reported here were conducted at the Marine
Hydrodynamics Laboratory, University of Michigan. A smooth
surface-piercing vertical cylinder was forced to oscillate parallel A experiments
to its axis. Table 1 gives the dimensions of the test cylinder, — friction drag
and the parameter ranges tested. The frequency parameter, /?,
is based upon the cylinder diameter. The cylinder was attached
to a Vertical Motion Mechanism (VMM) and oscillated in
heave. The VMM produces a uniform vertical motion and
negligible motion in the other modes of freedom. The oscil-
lation frequency of 0.41 Hz was so chosen to correspond closely
to the natural frequency of the system in heave. At this resonant
I
condition, the inertia effect of the cylinder and attached dy-
namometers is nearly offset by the restoring force associated
with the fluctuating buoyancy force. As mentioned before, due
to the lack of inertia dominance, the force measurements give 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
a reliable estimate of the drag coefficient. The repeatability of KC
the data was verified during the experiments. Fig. 3 Drag coefficient (Crf„) for a horizontal cylinder versus KC; 0
For typical forced oscillation measurements, forces are 89236
measured using four load cells, and cylinder displacements are
measured using two potentiometers. At each run, data over
16 cycles is collected and sampled at a rate of 128 points/cycle. Alternatively, for sinusoidal motions the drag forces can be
This data is then Fourier transformed to identify the magni- interpreted in a Fourier-averaged sense as
tudes and phases of the forces and displacements. The drag
force is identified as the out-of-phase component of the total Fd(t) = Bvu{t) (3)
force at the oscillating frequency. The equivalent linear damping coefficient B„ can be related to
Cdv in a straightforward manner (Sarpkaya and Isaacson,
3 Results and Discussion 1981). For a vertical cylinder, this relationship is found to be
Two options are present for normalizing the force coefficient
for an axially oscillating vertical cylinder. One option would Bv = -^DvKCCdv (4)
use the vertical wetted surface area (i.e., -wDvT), while the other
would use the cross sectional area (irDv2/4). Using the cross- Some of the results from the experiments are shown in Figs.
sectional area would give a formulation similar to Morison's 2 and 3. Figure 2 is a plot of the damping coefficient Bv (in
equation, and has been used, for example, by Graham (1980) units of N-s/m) versus KC. From this figure, a definite linear
in relation to vortex shedding due to an isolated edge. For a trend is observed. A linear curve fit to the data gives a slope
vertical cylinder, vortex shedding off the sharp corner at the of 15.627 N-s/m, an offset of 3.424 N-s/m, and a correlation
bottom is expected to be the dominant part of the flow. Hence, coefficient of R2 = 0.995. In Fig. 3, a plot of Cd0 versus KC is
the latter normalization option is adopted. KC and jS are de- derived using Eq. (4).
fined based on the cylinder diameter (Z)„) for the same reason. Drag force component analysis commonly used in model-
Following Morison's equation, the vertical drag force is full-scale ship drag analysis is described in Couch et al. (1984).
modeled as Using a similar concept, the drag force on the cylinder is
decomposed into its friction and form drag components. The
Fdit) = -pSCdou(t) \u(t)l friction drag is mainly due to the viscous tangential stresses
(2)
acting along the walls of the cylinder. Vortex formation and
the transverse curvature of the cylinder can be neglected, i.e., t»=C^f(^,KC,0) (8)
the flow is locally two-dimensional. In the present case this
ratio is estimated to be 374. For the model cylinder, from Fig. 2 this relationship is iden-
For the case of a vertical cylinder in heave, the friction drag tified to be linear for fixed geometry and /3, i.e.,
components are given by the following expressions, using the iv=Cm\a, + a2KC) (9)
velocity profiles given by Batchelor (1973) or Telionis (1981):
Equation (9) can be used for estimating the damping ratio of
^ ( f r i c t i o n ) = 7T1'57>|80 the prototype, if at and a-i can be scaled appropriately. Assume
the following:
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering MAY 1994, Vol. 116/73
No of vertical columns 4
• Column diameter 15.85 m (52 ft)
Column draft 33.52 m (110 ft)
) No. of horizontal pontoons 4
&
* Pontoon diameter 8.53 m (28 ft)
Pontoon length 45.11 m(148 ft)
Total displacement 37724 t (2.584 x 106 slugs)
p 1 Estimated pre-tension 20 percent
CJ • • A Free-floating displacement 31437 t (2.154 x 106 slugs)
Free-floating draft 25.75 m (84.51 ft)
s$>2 Mass of each column 5212 t (3.571 X 105 slugs
Mass of each pontoon 2646 t (1.813 x 105 slugs)
Period of oscillation 2s
0.1
1E+2 1E+3 1E+4 1E+5 1E+6 f*=- (14)
P An effective eddy viscosity may be used in order to take the
intercept difference into account. The results of Troesch and
• Troesch & Kim (1991) experiment Kim (1991) for circular cylinders give
B Troesch & Kim (1991) extrapolated i>eff = 2 1 v
— Theory (Wang, 1968) The parameter /3 in Eq. (14) may be replaced by /3eff defined
as
« Bearman et al. (1985) experiment
(15)
n Sarpkaya (1986) experiment "eff
Fig. 4 Drag coefficient (Cd„) for a horizontal cylinder versus 0; KC For square section cylinders, Troesch and Kim (1991) estimated
0.5 that
Ceff=51 V (17)
presents the idea of an effective eddy viscosity to explain this
difference in intercept. Troesch and Kim (1991) suggest that 6 Example TLP Calculation
an experimentally found effective eddy viscosity can be used
with laminar theory to derive empirical drag coefficients. The scaling laws described in the two previous sections are
applied to a prototype tension leg platform given by Petrauskas
Figure 4 is a plot of Cdh versus /3 at a KC value of 0.5.
and Liu (1987). Table 2 gives the dimensions of this prototype
Shown in the figure are results obtained by many authors,
TLP. Though this prototype does not scale perfectly with the
along with the laminar theory line of Wang (1968). Troesch
model dimensions of Table 1, the scaling laws can still be
and Kim's (1991) result shows an extrapolated point obtained
applied, since all quantities used in the calculations are di-
from the pre-transition least squares curve. Around /3 = 20000,
mensionless.
the drag coefficient suddenly increases, and decreases gradually
afterward. An effective eddy viscosity would generate lines Using the experimental data from Fig. 1, the scaling law for
parallel to the curve denoted as Wang's theory. Figure 4 sug- the vertical cylinder damping ratio (Eq. (9)) becomes
gests that an effective eddy viscosity correction, if valid, would
be applicable only over small ranges of /3. Alternatively, it may Jv ~~ C , „ ~0'5 + 0.0394 — KC (18)
be possible that at large values of /3, Cdh becomes independent
of (3. Evidence from this figure is not entirely conclusive, and For the vertical columns of the prototype
more results are required at higher /3 values to identify the
trend of Cdh. ^ = 0.473
Most authors agree that at low KC, the trend of Cdh is
satisfactorily represented by the laminar theory. Based upon
j3 = 9.324 xlO 7
this assumption, the theoretical expression for the drag coef-
ficient becomes (Wang, 1968; Troesch and Kim, 1991) Using Cm = 1.15, Eq. (18) yields the following scaling law for
the prototype:
Crf„=^"(KC)-/3- (12) f„ (prototype) = 8.718 x 10" 5 + 0.0162(KC) (19)
The friction drag contribution to the total damping is sur-
Following the procedure for Eq. (4), we obtain for a horizontal prisingly low for the prototype in comparison with the model.
cylinder This is to be partially expected, since the prototype /3 is much
larger than that of the model. At /3 = 9 x 107 and for very
low KC (say 0.01-0.1), the amplitude Reynolds number is in
(13) the range 103-105, and the boundary layer is laminar or in
3ir
transition. Based on the deductions of Kamphuis (1975), the
Inserting Eqs. (12) and (13) into the expression for ft, (Eq. effect of turbulence on friction drag is negligible over this range
(11)) of Reynolds number.
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering MAY 1994, Vol. 116/75
/TT\
s WORKING IN JAPAN ¥ ¥ AN INSIDER'S GUIDE FOR ENGINEERS
edited by Hiroshi Honda, R. C. Vonderau,
K. TaKaiwa, D. Day, and S. Fuhuda
C ontaining a wealth of useful information for any engineering professional planning to relocate to or visit Japan,
. this concise paperback gives practical answers to all of your questions about Japanese employment prac-
tices, culture, and society. Written by engineering professionals of many nationalities and backgrounds, WORKING IN
JAPAN is packed with insights and strategies that will help close the culture gap — from language barriers to
differences in the work ethic. Specifically, this book of practical insights features the following:
• guidance on which industries arc hiring foreign engineers • explanations of cultural differences you need lo Know
• practical information on hiring practices and salaries • tips for adjusting to daily life
• insights into future trends in employment • a useful glossary of Japanese terms
Prepare yourself now. Hake sure you know the hows and whys of working in Japan—whether you are already there,
making plans to go, or just thinking about possibilities — order your copies of WORKING IN JAPAN today.
TO ORDER :
In the U.S./Canada: \V* V , Fax: (201) 8 8 2 1 7 1 7 or (201) 8 8 2 5 1 55
( 8 0 0 ) T H E A S M E , ext. 618
(800 843 2763)
Write: ASME, Dept. M I S , 22 L a w Drive,
In Mexico:
9 5 , ( 8 0 0 ) 8 4 3 2 7 6 3 , ext. 618
Outside North America:
p^Tj B o x 2 9 0 0 , Fairfield, N J 0 7 0 0 7 - 2 9 0 0
ASME
(201)882 1 167. ext.618 <jQ Email: CompuServe 73302,1017 I KLlob