0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)

6 vizualizări6 paginiPhotovoltaic panel

Nov 24, 2019

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

Photovoltaic panel

© All Rights Reserved

0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)

6 vizualizări6 paginiPhotovoltaic panel

© All Rights Reserved

Sunteți pe pagina 1din 6

Reactive Power Compensation Capability

School of Automation,

Northwestern Polytechnical University,

Xi’an, China

E-mail: kshen@nwpu.edu.cn

Abstract—This paper discusses the active and reactive power improve the effective utilization and save investment cost of

control method for a modular multilevel converter (MMC) based PV systems. Previous works were mainly focused on the PV

grid-connected PV system. The voltage vector space analysis is systems operating as a power quality conditioner capable of

performed by using average value models for the feasibility compensate harmonics and reactive power [10-11], but the

analysis of reactive power compensation (RPC). The proposed research on active and reactive power control strategies for the

double-loop control strategy enables the PV system to handle MMC based grid-connected PV system remains unexplored.

unidirectional active power flow and bidirectional reactive power

flow. Experiments have been performed on a laboratory-scaled This paper focuses on a feasible physical configuration for

modular multilevel PV inverter. The experimental results verify modular multilevel grid-connected PV systems. The voltage

the correctness and feasibility of the proposed strategy. space vector for the converter system is modeled to analyze the

control possibilities of the active and reactive power injection

Keywords—Modular multilevel converter; grid-connected PV by a grid-connected PV source. Then, a concrete control

systems, reactive power compensation, maximum solar power procedure for the grid-connected MMC based PV system with

injection multi-function is explained in the interest of increasing the

utilization rate of PV systems.

I. INTRODUCTION

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section II

Countries worldwide are currently facing challenges such describes the system configuration of a MMC based grid-

as energy shortage and environmental deterioration. connected PV system. Then, the proposed control strategy is

Consequently, the pollution-free, renewable energy sources addressed in Section III. Experimental results conducted on a

have shown attractive prospects. Solar power generation is small-scale prototype are included in Section IV. Finally, the

largely promoted because it produces no pollution, has very concluding remarks are drawn in Section V.

abundant power supply, and tends to be popularized

extensively in distributed energy (DE) systems.

II. CONFIGURATION DESCRIPTION

Large-scale application of grid-connected PV systems has

become a trend. Hence, the power electronic interfaces are A. Configuration of Grid Interfacing PV Power Plants

subject to several requirements, such as efficiency, reliability, Fig. 1 shows the single-phase topology of the proposed

power quality, etc. [1]. The topology optimization of power single-stage modular multilevel photovoltaic grid-connected

electronic interfaces is an essential aspect of the research and inverter. The series-parallel connection of PV panels that make

development of PV systems. The multilevel converters as up a PV array to obtain a dc bus with an adequate voltage for

interfacing units for grid-connected PV systems have been utility-scale solar energy generation. The number of branches

investigated intensively during the past decade [2-9]. This in parallel is written as N p , while in each branch N s PV panels

includes the use of neutral point clamped (NPC) inverter [2], are connected in series. Two power decoupling capacitors with

cascaded H-bridge inverter [3-6] and modular multilevel the same capacitance, C 1 and C 2 , are connected in series

converter (MMC) [7-9]. Since the MMC possesses the distinct between the positive and negative dc buses. In normal state,

features of modular design, easy scalability, and fault tolerant each legs of the MMC invariably keep n SMs on duty. In each

capability, the previous paper [8] suggested that the MMC has SM, the value of the energy storage capacitor is C SM , which

a large potential to be the next-generation large-scale PV grid- provides a stable dc voltage for the SMs and ensures the

connected inverter,. normal operation of the MMC. Fig. 1 describes circuit

Meanwhile, the solar industry is facing serious cost schematic among the grid voltage u ga , transformer secondary

pressures, so it is very crucial to find a control strategy to side voltage u sa , and dc bus voltage u pv , where Z in represents

the buffering reactor impedance, Z s denotes the total equivalent

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science

Foundation of China (Grant No. 51507142) and in part by the Shaanxi

Provincial Natural Science Foundation for Basic Research, China (Grant No.

2016JQ5010).

l-)))

impedance of the filter inductor, respectively. The turns of the the upper and lower arms, and will not affect the MMC output

isolated transformer in primary and secondary are expressed as current [12], where I CCa can be expressed as:

N 1 and N 2 , respectively. Then the transformation ratio T r can 1

be calculated as I CCa iUa iLa (4)

2

N1 According to Kirhhoff’s laws, the grid-connected MMC

Tr (1) system is characterized by the following equations

N2

ioa iUa iLa (5)

Ideal Utility

PV Array Modular PV Inverter Line Filter

Transformer Grid upv

s usA1 iUa Z in ioa Z s usa 0 (6)

2

ipv

SM1 upv

...

usA1 uA2t iLa Z in ioa Z s usa 0 (7)

...

C1 2

SMn

A1 N2 : N1 Subtracting (7) from (6), then substituting (5) into this

... o

Zin iUa ioa

equation yields

Np upv

Zin iLa uoa Zs

uA2t usA1 Z

usa uga ioa ( in Z s ) usa 0 (8)

...

...

...

A2

SMn+1

2 2

C2

The inner electromotive force (EMF) e ia is defined by

...

... uA2t

SM2n uA2t usA1

eia (9)

t 2

Ns This voltage loop equation (8) can be rewritten as follows

Z

Fig. 1. System configuration of the proposed grid-connected modular eia ioa ( in Z s ) usa 0 (10)

multilevel PV system. 2

Equation (10) implies that the buffering reactor impedance

can be considered as a part of the grid-connected impedance.

B. Voltage Vector Space Analysis

Fig. 2 shows the simplified modular multilevel grid-

According to the current and voltage definitions shown in connected inverter equivalent circuit, where R e is defined as

Fig. 1, the expressions for the upper and lower arm terminal the equivalent resistor of the grid-connected inverter.

voltages, u sA1 and u A2t , can be written as follows

n n

Re Lin/2+Ls

usA1 ¦ s j vcj ¦ s j (Vdc 'vcj ) ioa

j 1 j 1 eia

(2) usa

n

N UVdc ¦ s j 'vcj

j 1 Fig. 2. Simplified equivalent circuit for the single-phase grid-connected

2n 2n modular multilevel PV system.

uA2t ¦ s j vcj ¦ s j (Vdc 'vcj )

Generally, the desired inner EMF e ia is controlled as a

j n 1 j n 1

(3) sinusoidal waveform

2n

N LVdc ¦ s j 'vcj

eia (t )

ma

upv sin(Z0 t M ) (11)

j n 1

2

where N U and N L refers to the actual switched SMs on upper where m a is defined as the modulation index of a-phase,

and lower arms respectively, V dc is the theoretical value of the and ĳ is the phase angle of the inner EMF voltage, Ȧ 0 is the

SM voltage, s j is the switching status of the jth 60ǻv cj is the radian frequency of the grid.

instantaneous value of the deviation for the jth capacitor

voltage in the arms. The circulating current I CCa only flow in

G G G

G G jZ0 (0.5 Lin Ls ) I oa

G jZ0 (0.5 Lin Ls ) I oa I oa G jZ0 (0.5 Lin Ls ) I oa U sa

Eia Eia G G

Re I oa G Re I oa

G G G G I oa G

I oa U sa Re I oa U sa Eia

(a) (b) (c)

Fig. 3. Phasor diagram of the simplified equivalent circuit. (a) Active power injection only. (b) Leading reactive power injection only. (c) Lagging reactive

power injection only.

The diagram of vectors at the point of common coupling controlling the active and reactive power exchange between

(PCC) is shown in Fig. 3. As can be seen from Fig. 3, when the MMC system and the utility grid.

the amplitude and phase of the inner EMF are adjusted, the

amplitude and phase of grid current vary as well, thereby

between the instantaneous conductance and the increment of

III. PROPOSED CONTROL STRATEGY conductance in real time.

The control scheme for a MMC based PV system is The reactive power controller regulates reactive and active

indicated in Fig. 4. A dual-loop control structure is proposed. power exchange between the MMC system and the utility grid

The outer loop is the feedback of dc bus voltage, and the inner when the reference current generating strategy is switched to

loop is the feedback of grid current. The algorithm in the outer the RPC mode. In RPC mode, the reference current is

voltage loop provides the reference grid current i ref , while the composed by the reactive component and the active component.

inner current loop ensures a high-precision grid current. For the reactive component, the amplitude of reference current

I qref is determined by the reactive power reference Q ref , which

A. Reference current generating strategy can be written as follows

For the MPPT controller, the amplitude of the reference

current I pref is obtained by proportion integration (PI) control 2Tr

I qref Qqref k Qqref (12)

of the error between the maximum power point (MPP) voltage Ug

U pref and the actual voltage u pv , and the phase of reference

current is determined by tracking the grid voltage through a where U g is the RMS Value of grid voltage, k is the gain factor.

phase-locked loop (PLL). In the proposed single-stage PV

system, the incremental conductance (IncCond) method is The active component of reference current is employed

adopted to realize the MPPT task [13]. When using this method, when considering the power loss may cause the dc bus and

the reference voltage of the maximum power point of the individual SM voltages to drop. The PI controller is designed to

photovoltaic cell is adjusted according to the comparing result maintain the dc bus voltage u pv to approach the reference value

U qref .

PI

controller

upv switch

Qref Iqref sinș irefa QPR

k

cosș controller MMC

cos Reactive Power ioa

Controller eia

uga ș sinș

PLL sin

sj ...

upv ik Phase

Gate

PI disposition

MPPT drivers

controller vcj PWM

ipv Ipref

Upref

MPPT Controller

Power circuits

Current feedback

Reference current generating control loop

When the system is operated in solar generator mode, the state error at the fundamental frequency, the quasi-

command value of the dc bus voltage U pref is calculated by the proportional-resonant (QPR) controller [14] is utilized for the

MPPT algorithm. When the system is operated in RPC mode, current loop controller to provide a high gain at the

the command value of the dc bus voltage U qref is a constant fundamental frequency without phase offset. The QPR

value. Here, U qref is set to the open circuit voltage of the PV controller consists of a proportional regulator and a quasi-

array. This setting aims to sustain a sufficient high dc bus resonant regulator. The gain of this controller is infinitely high

voltage to avoid duty cycle saturation [14]. at the resonance frequency and extremely low at the non-

resonant frequency. Therefore, the QPR controller can obtain

B. Grid current feedback control steady-error-free regulation of the fundamental harmonic

The inner current loop controls the MMC output current i oa frequency component when used to control directly the AC

to follow the reference current i refa as close as possible. quantity, thereby achieving excellent steady and transient

Conventional PI controllers suffer from the drawback of performance. The transfer function is shown in (13).

unavoidable steady-state error, which influences the tracking

performance of the grid current. In order to reduce the steady-

2 k r Zc s

Gi ( s ) kp (13)

s 2 2Zc s Z02

where k p , k r , and Ȧ c are the proportional gain, resonant

gain, equivalent bandwidth frequency, respectively.

Phase disposition PWM method is adopted to generate the

gate signals. Since the basic principle of SM capacitor voltage

balancing control has been discussed in detail in [15], it won't

be covered here.

To verify the performance of a modular multilevel grid-

connected PV system and the effectiveness of the proposed

methods, a hardware prototype was built and tested in Fig. 5. Experimental setup.

laboratory. The control system for the experimental system was

implemented by a dSPACE 1103 control board. MOSFET of A. MPPT Mode

IXFH70N20Q3 is chosen for the switches. The PV panels from

Sanyo with the part number HIP-195BA19 are employed to Fig. 6 shows the experiment results of active power

carry out the experiments. transmission obtained from the rooftop grid-connected PV

system. Fig. 6(a) and (b) describe experimental dc bus voltage

The major electrical specifications of the PV panels are u pv , ac grid voltage u g , output voltage u o , and output current i o

shown in Table 1. Experimental setup of a five-level MMC is under MPPT mode. From both Fig. 6, it can be concluded that

shown in Fig. 5. Table 2 summarizes the circuit parameters and the proposed technique can simultaneously accomplish the two

test conditions of the experiment platform. The experimental tasks of MPPT and grid-connected current control.

verification is presented in the following parts.

upv (100V/div)

TABLE I. ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PV PANELS

ioa (10A/div) uga (100V/div)

Parameters Symbols Values

Maximum power P max 195W

TABLE II. CIRCUIT PARAMETERS AND TEST CONDITIONS OF THE Time (10ms/div)

EXPERIMENT PLATFORM

(a)

Parameters Symbols Values

Command dc bus voltage in RPC

U qref 272.4V

mode

upv (100V/div)

DC bus capacitance C1 , C2 4700ȝF

Buffer inductor uoa (100V/div)

L in 0.5mH

Number of PV panels in parallel Np 1

iUa (10A/div)

Number of PV panels in series Ns 4

Grid voltage (rms) Ug 115V Fig. 6. Experiment results of active power transmission under MPPT

Transformer turns ratio Tr 2.5(N1/N2) mode. (a) dc bus voltage u pv , ac grid voltage u g , and arm current i U .

(b) dc bus voltage u pv , output voltage u o , and arm currents i U , i L .

Fig. 7 (a) and (b) show the steady-state experimental

waveforms of SM capacitor voltages on upper and lower arms,

respectively. The test results indicate that the control of

capacitor voltage balance is feasible and effective. ioa (10A/div)

uga (50V/div)

Time (4ms/div)

Time (200ms/div)

uga (50V/div)

Time (4ms/div)

Time (200ms/div)

V. CONCLUSION

(b)

This paper has addressed the design approaches and

control strategies for the MMC based PV grid-integration. The

Fig. 7. Experiment results of SM capacitor voltages. (a) v c1 (Ch1, 10

major accomplishments and some conclusions are summarized

V/div), v c2 (Ch2, 10 V/div), v c3 (Ch3, 10 V/div), and v c4 (Ch4, 10 in the following.

V/div) in upper arm. (b) v c5 (Ch1, 10 V/div), v c6 (Ch2, 10 V/div), 1) The MMC based PV system is able to perform well both

v c7 (Ch3, 10 V/div), and v c8 (Ch4, 10 V/div) in lower arm. in active power injection and reactive power compensation

conditions, and this favors the enhancement of utilization of

B. RPC Mode the PV systems.

Fig. 8(a) and (b) show the experiment results of leading 2) The presented method is easy to implement. It only

reactive power injection conditions at the steady states. needs to change the software to adapt different voltage classes

and power capacities.

Similar experimental results can be seen in Fig. 9 with

lagging reactive power injection. 3) Experimental verification of the control of the single-

phase modular PV inverter system confirms the effectiveness

As can be seen from Fig. 8 and Fig. 9, the double loop

and practical feasibility of the proposed strategy.

control scheme enables the system to achieve favorable RPC

performance.

REFERENCES

[1] Calais, M., Agelidis, V. G., “Multilevel converters for single-phase grid

connected photovoltaic systems – an overview,” Proc. IEEE

International Symposium on Ind. Electron., vol. 1, pp. 224-229, 1998.

[2] Alepuz, S., Monge, S. B., Bordonau J., et al, “Interfacing renewable

energy sources to the utility grid using a three-level inverter,” IEEE

Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1504-1511, Oct. 2006.

[3] Villanueva, E., Correa, P., Rodríguez, J., and Pacas, M., “Control of a

single-phase cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter for grid-connected

photovoltaic systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 11, pp.

4399–4406, Nov. 2009.

[4] Zhao, W., Choi, H., Konstantinou, G., et al, “Cascaded H-bridge

multilevel converter for large-scale PV grid-integration with isolated

DC-DC stage,” Proc. IEEE Int. Symposium on Power Elect. for

Distributed Gen. Systems, pp. 849–856, 2012.

[5] Alexander, A., Thathan, M., “Modelling and analysis of modular

multilevel converter for solar photovoltaic applications to improve

power quality,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 78–

88, Jan. 2015.

[6] Chavarría, J., Biel, D., Guinjoan, F., et al, “Energy-balance control of

PV cascaded multilevel grid-connected inverters under level-shifted and

phase-shifted PWMs,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 98–

111, Jan. 2013.

[7] Echeverría, J., Kouro, S., Pérez, M., et al, “Multi-modular cascaded DC-

DC converter for HVDC grid connection of large-scale photovoltaic

power systems,” Proc. 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial

Electronics Society, pp. 6999–7005, 2013.

[8] Mei, J., Xiao, B., Shen, K., et al, “Modular multilevel inverter with new

modulation method and its application to photovoltaic grid-connected

generator,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 5063–5073,

Nov. 2013.

[9] Tiku, D., “Modular multilevel MMI(HB) topology for single-stage grid

connected PV plant. Proc. 11th IET International Conference on AC and

DC Power Transmission, pp. 1–8, 2015.

[10] Wu, L., Zhao, Z., Liu, J., “A single-stage three-phase grid-connected

photovoltaic system with modified MPPT method and reactive power

compensation,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 881–

886, Dec. 2007.

[11] Mastromauro, R. A., Liserre, M., Kerekes, T., et al, “A single-phase

voltage-controlled grid-connected photovoltaic system with power

quality conditioner functionality,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56,

no. 11, pp. 4436–4444, Nov. 2008.

[12] G. Bergna, J.A. Suul, E. Bernet, P. Egrott, P. Lefranc, J.C. Vannier and

M. Molinas, “Mitigating DC-Side Power Oscillations and Negative

Sequence Load Currents in Modular Multilevel Converters under

Unbalanced Faults- First Approach using Resonant PI,” 38th Annual

Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2012, 25-28

October 2012.

[13] Jain, S., Agarwal, V., “Comparison of the performance of maximum

power point tracking schemes applied to single-stage grid-connected

photovoltaic systems,” IET Electr. Power Appl., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 753–

762, Sept. 2007.

[14] Park, S. Y., Chen, C. L., Lai, J. S., “A wide-range active and reactive

power flow controller for a solid oxide fuel cell power conditioning

system,” IEEE Power Electron., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2703-2709, Nov.

2008.

[15] Saeedifard, M., Iravani, R., “Dynamic performance of a modular

multilevel back-to-back HVDC system,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery,

vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2903-2912, Oct. 2010.