Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Names:
Jamaica M. Andrade
Maria Rizza V. Lopez
Janella Marie B. Recaplaza
Ernahessa P. Reyes
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 1
I. INTRODUCTION
The rising demand for English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers in non-English
speaking countries such as South Korea, Japan, China etc. paved way for online language
teaching. Since the vast improvement of internet and digital devices in the recent years,
ESL teaching and learning has escalated rapidly. Online ESL tutorial companies that cater
to different nationalities has increased worldwide. In the Philippines, it has been more than
a decade since English-teaching have started. To meet the increasing pressure, a China-
based ESL platform is seeking to hire more than 100,000 English teachers from the
Philippines in the next five years (Gonzales, The Philippine Star, 2019).
The main requirements of ESL firms are teaching skills, English proficiency, and
attitude. On the other hand, such companies also want teachers with technical skills;
practitioners who are capable of using online applications, websites, tools, and digital
language learning. But virtual environment are yet to be proven effective primarily on the
A paper by Son, J.B. (2011), Online Tools for Language Teaching, comprehensively
discusses the different online tools that ESL teachers can use in a traditional and virtual
classroom. Additionally, he states that it has been difficult to choose the right devices for
specific purposes due to the abundance of tools found on the internet. It is important to
choose and evaluate such tools which can be used for online language learning.
There are few researches done previously on online language learning. Since ESL
companies have distinct tools and applications, student’s outcome could vary from
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 2
platform to platform. The end results are affected by the efficiency and proficiency of the
online English learning research for there is little evidence of how effective virtual
classrooms are. In addition to their statement, further studies will help ESL practitioners to
In this study, the researchers will try to evaluate the effectiveness of the current ESL
7. What is the overall effectiveness of online language learning in enhancing the four
macro skills (Reading, Writing, Listening, and Speaking)?
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 3
Scope
This research will focus on the ESL practitioners in a virtual classroom in the
Philippines. The paper will answer the impact and relevance of using technology in Online
Language Learning.
The researchers find this study relevant to the present status of education. As 21 st-
century learners emerge, there is also a need to improve and enhance the teachers’
strategies in teaching, one of which is through online learning. Rich, E. (2010) put
emphasis on digital literacy as one of the 21st-century skills that students should possess.
Digital Literacy is the ability to use information and communication technologies to find,
evaluate, create, and communicate information, requiring both cognitive and technical
in virtual classroom, there is a need to assess the effectivity of online teaching in learning
acquisition and whether these learning tools or web tools can greatly enhance the
The outcomes of this research can help the teachers whether they are teaching
online or in an actual classroom and the students as well. The ESL teachers can benefit a
lot from this research as they make it a guide if their online tools are still effective to use
or ineffective that needs to be updated. For non-online teachers, they can reflect on the
traditional teaching strategies that they use in class and utilize some web tools in their
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 4
actual teaching. The students will be able to appreciate the importance and advantages of
these tools in education and they can be guided with the right usage of these tools.
The study used the quantitative method to gather the necessary data. This paper
includes the responses of the teachers regarding the issues and challenges they have
encountered in teaching English online. An online survey technique was used to gather
data needed for the study. The gathered data will serve as a tool to identify the possible
solutions and interventions to neutralize the problem and challenges that Online English
teachers experience.
Sources of Data
The respondents of the study were teachers from different ESL companies. They
were asked to participate in an online survey which was conducted through a Google
Data Analysis
The researchers used the analytical software IBM SPSS Statistics Tool which
organized presentation of the results. To give evaluations for the mean, equivalent verbal
III. RESULTS
Table 1
FREQUENCY
ONLINE TOOLS MEAN VI RANK
5 4 3 2 1
1. Reference Books in
17 11 1 0 0 4.55 HE 3
Digital Format
2. Videos and
21 5 3 0 0 4.62 HE 2
Animations
3. E-mail 12 9 7 1 0 4.10 E 6
4. Discussion Boards 12 15 2 0 0 4.34 HE 5
5. Mobile
Applications (Translation
21 7 1 0 0 4.69 HE 1
Apps, Dictionaries,
Educational Apps)
6. Social Media
18 9 1 1 0 4.52 HE 4
Websites or Applications
Overall Weighted Mean 4.47 HE
Legend: 1.00 to 1.80 – Not Effective (NE); 1.81 to 2.60 – Less Effective (LE); 2.61 to 3.20 – Moderately
Effective (ME); 3.21 to 4.20 – Effective (E); and 4.21 to 5.00 – Highly Effective (HE)
Educational Apps' tops the list as highly effective inside the virtual classroom with a mean
of 4.69. This is followed by Videos and Animations, Reference Books in Digital Format,
Social Media Websites or Applications and Discussion Boards which the results says are
also 'highly effective' with a mean of 4.62, 4.55, 4.52 and 4.34 respectively. On the other
hand, using email while teaching online proves to be effective. The result is supported by
the fact that the younger generation are into Mobile Applications. They are using their
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 6
phones in almost everything that they do, and they find it useful and handy to use their
Table 2
Learning Environment
COMMON FREQUENCY
5 4 3 2 1 MEAN VI RANK
RESPONSES
1. There are means to
interact with their fellow 8 10 4 2 5 3.48 A 4
students online
2. The use of videos
and animations has increased
the amount of information my
14 6 3 2 4 3.83 A 1
students learned.
3. There should be more
support material like quizzes, 12 8 1 4 4 3.69 A 2
animations, etc.
4. There are means to
interact with teachers online.
10 10 1 1 7 3.52 A 3
5. The students can
work at their own pace and 7 8 7 4 3 3.41 A 5
procrastinate.
6. The students are web
proficient. 5 9 7 7 1 3.34 A 6
7. The teachers are web
proficient. 6 12 5 2 4 3.48 A 4
Overall Weighted Mean 3.54 A
Legend: 1.00 to 1.80 – Strongly Disagree (SDA); 1.81 to 2.60 – Disagree (DA); 2.61 to 3.20 – Neutral (N);
3.21 to 4.20 – Agree (A); and 4.21 to 5.00 – Strongly Agree (SA)
Table 2 shows the common responses of Online Teachers in using Online Learning
Environment.
The results show that the teachers 'agree' to use videos and animations to increase
the amount of information learned by their students with a mean of 3.83. It is presented that
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 7
the practitioners 'agree' to the idea that there should be more support material like quizzes,
On the other hand, online teachers doesn't have the opportunity to interact with
other teachers and same goes with students who doesn't interact with their fellow students
online.
The data also shows that teachers are web proficient, students can work at their own pace
and procrastinate and students are web proficient too having the mean score of 3.48, 3.41
Table 3
in a Virtual Classroom
FREQUENCY
WEB TOOLS MEAN VI RANK
5 4 3 2 1
1. Wi-Fi Technology & 8 9 9 1 2 AA 1
Internet 3.69
2. Computer, Laptop, 8 8 11 0 2 AA 1
Tablet, Cellphone 3.69
3. Social Networking 7 7 12 3 0 AA 2
and Blogs 3.62
4. Audio Files – 4 8 12 5 0 AA 4
Podcasts 3.38
5. Educational Websites 6 8 9 4 2 AA 3
(Coursera, Edmodo,
Blackboard etc.) 3.41
Overall Weighted Mean 3.56 AA
Legend: 1.00 to 1.80 – Very Poor (VP); 1.81 to 2.60 – Below Average (BA); 2.61 to 3.20 – Average (A);
3.21 to 4.20 – Above Average (AA); and 4.21 to 5.00 – Excellent (E)
Table 3 shows the Mean Distribution of Frequency of Useful Web Tools in a Virtual
Classroom.
According to the data, the teachers in a virtual classroom find Wi-Fi Technology &
Internet and Computer, Laptop, Tablet, Cellphone as useful web tools with both having a
computed mean of 3.69. They also agree that Social Networking and Blogs, Audio Files –
Podcasts and Educational Websites (Coursera, Edmodo, and Blackboard etc.) are useful
inside a virtual environment with a mean score of 3.62, 3.41 and 3.38 respectively.
Table 4
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 9
Mean Distribution of Frequency the efficiency of online practice in enhancing the four
FREQUENCY VI
MEAN
5 4 3 2 1
I find online practice efficient
in providing opportunities to
enhance the four Macro Skills 8 18 1 0 2 4.03 A
(Reading, Writing, Listening,
and Speaking).
Overall Weighted Mean 4.03 A
Legend: 1.00 to 1.80 – Strongly Disagree (SDA); 1.81 to 2.60 – Disagree (DA);
2.61 to 3.20 – Neutral (N); 3.21 to 4.20 – Agree (A); and 4.21 to 5.00 – Strongly Agree (SA)
Table 4 presents the Mean Distribution of Frequency the efficiency of online practice
in enhancing the four Macro Skills (Reading, Writing, Listening, and Speaking).
to enhance the four Macro Skills (Reading, Writing, Listening, and Speaking) with a
This statement is supported by the idea that the students enjoy using technology
inside the classroom. They even use their mobile phones in learning a second language.
By utilizing online assessment, the teachers can use a variety of online material that would
Table 5
FREQUENCY MEAN VI
5 4 3 2 1
Do you find student-
instructor's interactive
discussion effective in 3.69
strengthening the four Macro 5 13 8 3 0 E
Skills: Reading, Writing,
Listening, and Speaking?
Overall Weighted Mean 3.69 E
Legend: 1.00 to 1.80 – Not Effective (NE); 1.81 to 2.60 – Less Effective (LE); 2.61 to 3.20 – Moderately
Effective (ME); 3.21 to 4.20 – Effective (E); and 4.21 to 5.00 – Highly Effective (HE)
Table 5 illustrates the data for Mean Distribution of Frequency of the effectivity of
strengthening the Macro Skills: Reading, Writing, Listening, and Speaking 'effective' with
a computed mean of 3.69. In the interactive discussion, students are given the opportunity
to share their thoughts and be involved in their learning environment. On the other hand,
teachers are also given the chance create a differentiated learning environment as well as
Table 6
enhancing the four Macro Skills: Reading, Writing, Listening, and Speaking
FREQUENCY VI
MEAN
5 4 3 2 1
Rate the overall effectiveness 7 14 7 1 0 3.93 E
of online language learning in
enhancing the four Macro
Skills: Reading, Writing,
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 11
online language learning in enhancing the four Macro Skills: Reading, Writing, Listening,
and Speaking.
As shown in the table, ESL Practitioners find online language learning 'effective' in
enhancing the four Macro Skills: Reading, Writing, Listening, and Speaking with a
computed mean of 3.93. This further explains that studying a foreign language through
online learning is efficient and can highly increase the student’s capability in performing
academic tasks that would require the use of the four Macro skills.
IV. DISCUSSION
The study aims to investigate the perspectives of ESL practitioners in a virtual classroom
in using technology. In order to get the answer of the first research question and to assess the
online tools used for language learning, the ESL practitioners were asked to rate the
following tools on a scale of 1-5 with 1= not effective and 5= highly effective. It is
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 12
interesting to note from the findings that most teachers rated mobile application(M=4.69),
reason stated for the high preference of the tool was its availability and accessibility to the
information such as using Google, Safari, Merriam Webster applications for quick searching
In table 2, the participants were given various responses of online teachers in using
online learning environment. Interestingly, most of the participants Agree with the use of
students(M=3.83). The reason for this agreement was the fact that students learn more
visually, using pictures and illustrations. Meanwhile, others also agree that online learning
that it makes teachers web proficient(M=3.48), that it let students work on their on
The following web tools are found useful to the virtual classroom, the participants
were asked to rate the students’ proficiency in the tools. The table 3 reveals that the students
were above average in using WiFi-Technology and internet(M=3.69), and computer, laptop,
tablet, cellphone(M=3.69). Most of these online learners where born with technology, thus
with the young age, they were aware of the usual technical terminologies and they were
taught to operate it. On the other hand, other students were also using social networking and
More interestingly, the ESL practitioners agrees that online practice is efficient in
providing opportunities to enhance the four macro skills(Reading, Writing, Listening, and
Speaking) because of various web tools that can be utilized by both the students and the
teachers. Various teaching strategies can be implemented as well with the use of WIFI and
internet, the practitioners can experiment some approaches to the teaching of English
language, and the resources are accessible everywhere in the virtual world. They also find
student-instructor’s interaction effective in strengthening the macro skills, even though the
chats are more popular as a medium of communication, the best learning is yet with actual
interaction between the student and teacher. Nevertheless, there are some web tools that can
be used to materialize an actual teaching such as video chats, facetime, and skype. Overall,
the study shows that ESL practitioners find online language learning effective in enhancing
the macro skills, since the students of today can learn best with the use of technology.
Recommendations
Based on the findings and conclusions drawn after the conduct of this research, the
utilize online tools such as free mobile applications, YouTube videos, and eBooks as in-
2. Virtual classrooms like Google Classroom, Blackboard, and Schoology should be used.
Classes are one-on-one and ESL students cannot interact with other ESL students due to
location differences. Such tools could help them to discuss, interact, and ask questions to
3. Since most students are proficient at using the internet and digital devices, ESL
companies are recommended to create a mobile application, website or software that would
synchronize the activities and progress of students. ESL students could view their tasks and
4. Macro skills development through online was difficult to administer before the
advancement of the internet and digital devices. Nonetheless, with proper and continuous
monitoring through synchronous online applications and websites, students could improve
not just their macro skills but the speech rate and fluency skills too.
The results of this study may provide sufficient information to improve the current status
of online language learning. Similarly, future studies should either execute a wider range or
REFERENCES
Gonzales, I. (2019, Jan. 5). NY-listed China online education firm to tap 100,000 English
teachers from the Philippines. The Philippine Star. Retrieved from: https://www.philstar.com
Heitin, Liana. (2016). Digital Literacy: An Evolving Definition. Education Week. Retrieved
from: https://www.edweek.org
Jabeen, S.S. & Thomas, A.J. (2015). Effectiveness of Online Language Learning. Retrieved
from: http://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCECS2015/WCECS2015_pp297-301.pdf
Rich, Elizabeth. (2010). How Do You Define 21st-Century Learning. Education Week.
Retrieved from: https://www.edweek.org
P O LY T E C H N I C U N I V E R S I T Y O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S 15
Son, J.B. (2011). Online Tools for Language Teaching. TESL-EJ. Retrieved from:
http://www.tesl-ej.org