budynas_SM_ch07.

qxd 11/30/2006 15:31 Page 179

FIRST PAGES

Chapter 7 179

7-2 This problem has to be done by successive trials, since Se is a function of shaft size. The
material is SAE 2340 for which Sut = 1226 MPa, S y = 1130 MPa, and H B ≥ 368.
Eq. (6-19): ka = 4.51(1226) −0.265 = 0.685

Trial #1: Choose dr = 22 mm

 −0.107
22
Eq. (6-20): kb = = 0.893
7.62
Eq. (6-18): Se = 0.685(0.893)(0.5)(1226) = 375 MPa
dr = d − 2r = 0.75D − 2D/20 = 0.65D
dr 22
D= = = 33.8 mm
0.65 0.65
D 33.8
r= = = 1.69 mm
20 20
Fig. A-15-14:
d = dr + 2r = 22 + 2(1.69) = 25.4 mm
d 25.4
= = 1.15
dr 22
r 1.69
= = 0.077
dr 22
K t = 1.9
Fig. A-15-15: K ts = 1.5
Fig. 6-20: r = 1.69 mm, q = 0.90
Fig. 6-21: r = 1.69 mm, qs = 0.97
Eq. (6-32): K f = 1 + 0.90(1.9 − 1) = 1.81
K f s = 1 + 0.97(1.5 − 1) = 1.49

We select the DE-ASME Elliptic failure criteria.

Eq. (7-12) with d as dr , and Mm = Ta = 0,
   1/2 1/3
 16(2.5) 3 2  3 2 
1.81(70)(10 ) 1.49(45)(10 )
dr = 4 +3
 π 375 1130 

= 20.6 mm
budynas_SM_ch07.qxd 11/30/2006 15:31 Page 180

FIRST PAGES

180 Solutions Manual • Instructor’s Solution Manual to Accompany Mechanical Engineering Design

Trial #2: Choose dr = 20.6 mm

 
20.6 −0.107
kb = = 0.899
7.62
Se = 0.685(0.899)(0.5)(1226) = 377.5 MPa
dr 20.6
D= = = 31.7 mm
0.65 0.65
D 31.7
r= = = 1.59 mm
20 20
Figs. A-15-14 and A-15-15:
d = dr + 2r = 20.6 + 2(1.59) = 23.8 mm
d 23.8
= = 1.16
dr 20.6
r 1.59
= = 0.077
dr 20.6
We are at the limit of readability of the figures so
K t = 1.9, K ts = 1.5 q = 0.9, qs = 0.97
∴ K f = 1.81 K f s = 1.49

Using Eq. (7-12) produces dr = 20.5 mm. Further iteration produces no change.
Decisions:
dr = 20.5 mm
20.5
D= = 31.5 mm, d = 0.75(31.5) = 23.6 mm
0.65
Use D = 32 mm, d = 24 mm, r = 1.6 mm Ans.

7-3 F cos 20°(d/2) = T, F = 2T /(d cos 20°) = 2(3000)/(6 cos 20°) = 1064 lbf
MC = 1064(4) = 4257 lbf · in
For sharp fillet radii at the shoulders, from Table 7-1, K t = 2.7, and K ts = 2.2. Examining
Figs. 6-20 and 6-21, with Sut = 80 kpsi, conservatively estimate q = 0.8 and qs = 0.9. These
estimates can be checked once a specific fillet radius is determined.
Eq. (6-32): K f = 1 + (0.8)(2.7 − 1) = 2.4
K f s = 1 + (0.9)(2.2 − 1) = 2.1
(a) Static analysis using fatigue stress concentration factors:
From Eq. (7-15) with M = Mm , T = Tm , and Ma = Ta = 0,
 2  2 1/2
 32K f M 16K fs T
σmax = +3
πd 3 πd 3