1

# MODERATOR

Good morning ladies and gentlements. Today we will have a debate betweenteam A as the affirmative team and team B as the
opposite team. Beside that, let me

introduce you to our time keeper “Anjar Satriya Nugraha” and I’m “Riyana ViniAlvionita” as your moderator.

Ladies and gentlemen , before we start our debate today, let me introduce youto the each team. On my left side, the affirmativ
e team they have Niken Rumani(stand up) as the first speaker, Aninda Kusumaningtyas (stand up) as the secondspeaker and t
he last one is Sri Muthia Sari (stand up) as the third speaker.On my right side , the opposite team they have Afriliyani Nur Aziz
ah (standup) as the first speaker, Alifianna (stand up) and the last one is Dhimas Jalu Prakoso(stand up) as the third speaker.

Okay ladies and gentlement , I’d like to show you about today’s motion.Today we have “Should The Children Allowed to Playin
g Game Online” as today’smotion. So, ladies and gentlemen let’s start our debate. So each team has

finished up

their building and now they are ready to debate. So I’ll call the first speaker from the

affirmative team to deliver the opinions.For the first speaker of the affirmative team, time is yours !

# THE 1

st

OF THE AFFIRMATIVE TEAM

Thank you so much for the time that

given to me. I’m Niken Rumani as the

first speaker from the affirmative team. First of all, I would like to introduce my

team’s split. For today’s motion. I’m as the first speaker from the affirmative team

would like to give the definition and give arguments from knowledge perspective.Aninda Kusumaningtyas as the 2

nd

speaker will deliver opinions from healthy perspective, and Sri Muthiasari as the 3

rd

speaker give rebuttal and strengthening the

team’s arguments.

I’m Niken Rumani from

the affirmative team. I completely agree with the

motion that children should playing video games. Before I deliver my arguments. I’ll

be deliver the definition of playing video game.Playing video game is a game that played with internet connection. This game
usually played in internet cafe.

Ladies and gentlements, beside that I’ll deliver some arguments about the
motion from knowledge perspective. My argument is :1.

Game online will indirectly teach children to understand the development ofupcoming technology.2.

Understanding economy. Many games teach children the values of economy.For example : the game of shopping, arranging re
staurant and etc. So whenthey grow to be adult, they can solve the problem about economy.

3.

And the last one is the use of English language. One of the most populargames on children is konsol. It is made by foreign com
pany. Automaticallythis game uses English language. When playing the game, children will findmany new english vocabularie
s.I think thats all my arguments. And I completely agree with the motion that

the children should be allowed to playing video game. I’m Niken Rumani back to the

house

# MODERATOR

Well thanks for the first speaker of the affirmative team. Next I’ll call the first

speaker of the opposite team to deliver the opinion. Time is yours !

# THE 1

st

OF THE OPPOSITE TEAM

Thank you so much for the time that

given to me. I’m Afrilyani Nur Azizah as

the first speaker from the opposite team. First of all, I would like to introduce my

team’s split. For today’s

motion. I’m as the first speaker from the opposite team

would like to give my opinion about the motion. Alifianna as the 2

nd

speaker willdeliver opinion from healthy perspective. And Dimas Jalu as the 3

rd

speaker give

conclution of the team’s arguments.

I’m Afrilyani Nur Azizah from opposite team. I want to give my opinion
about the motion. I personally think that the children should not to be allowed to

playing game online. That’s right today’s technology gives many benefit for children.

But they are too young to use it. And beside that the children who is addicted to thegame will spend most of their time in hom
e. They will isolate their selves fromsociety. They hardly play with friends because they have their own game. They alsolook li
ke have another world.Maybe they can speak in English much better, but the game can change themto be a lazy person. Beside
that, they become lazy to doing their homework.So, ladies and gentlements based on my opinion that I have been delivered. I
still stand up on my opinion that I disagree with the motion that said the childrenshould be allowed ` playing game online.

I’m Afrilyani Nur Azizah back to the house.

# MODERATOR

Well that’s the first arguments from the opposite team. What do you think

about the motion ? To the second of affirmative team , time is yours !

# THE 2

nd

SPEAKER OF THE AFFIRMATIVE TEAM

Ok

ay thank’s for the time that

given to me. I’m Aninda Kusumaningtyas as

the second speaker from the affirmative team. I want to give my rebuttal for the firstargument of negative team. She said that
the children being isolated, but I think with playing game online they can get many friends from it. Because playing game onli
nenot only at home but also at internet café with friends.Playing game online could decrease our stress, beside that playing ga
meonline also good for our brain.When playing the game, the children are forced to win the game is helping thechildren to use
their logic in analizing and problem solving. So, they can learn tosolve their problem in the real life.Game online can also stim
ulating the brain. The players of the game cancreate their own game according to their want. This will help to stimulate the br
ainand thinking process in creating the long scenario it is the part of their creativity.

That’s my opinion. For my reason above, I absolutely agree with the motion.I’m Aninda Kusumaningtyas back to the hous

e.

# MODERATOR

Well thanks for the second speaker of the affirmative team , next I’ll call the

second speaker from opposite team to give the rebuttal for the second arguments ofaffirmative team. Time is yours !

# THE 2

nd

OF THE OPPOSITE TEAM

Thanks for

the time that has given to me. I’m Alifianna as the second speaker
from opposite team. I want to give my rebuttal for the second opinion of affirmativeteam.She said that playing game online ca
n stimulating the brain. But I disagreeabout the opinion. I think that playing game online is not good for the health. Maybewit
h playing game online can exercize the logic, but if the children have already

addicted to the game, it’s not good for their health. Usually the children who as

addicted to the game just have short duration of sleeping.Children like to spend most of their time in school. However they als
o want to play game online. Thus, they will use their time of sleeping to play the game. If it

runs for long time, it will disturb children’s health.

Beside that, the children are also being untidy. When someone is addicted in playing game, she or he will ignore her surrondi
ng, including her clearness. Sherarely takes a bath. So, it will create agne and tootache.

I think that’s all my opinion. Based on m

y rebuttal, I still stand up on my

opinion that I disagree with the motion. I’m Alifianna back to the house.

# MODERATOR

Thanks for the second speaker of the opposite team , that’s a good opinion.Okay ladies and gentlemen, next I’ll call the third

speaker of affirmative team todeliver the conclution. Time is yours !

# THE 3

rd

SPEAKER OF THE AFFIRMATIVE TEAM

Thanks for the time that

given to me. I’m Sri Muthia Sari as the third speaker

from affirmative team, here I want to deliver the conclution of our opinion.In conclution, they who spend their time to play ga
me online have a bettersocial responsibility, for example : leadership and decision making.From the knowledge perspective th
e game can teach the children tounderstand the development of upcoming technology.The game also make the children under
standing economy and teach them tolearn in English language.And from the health perspective, game online can exercizing th
e logic andstimulating the brain.Game online also could decrease our stress.

That’s the conclution of our team. So, ladies and gentlement based on the

definition, limitation and opinion of our team, we are still stand up on our opinionthat we are agree with the motion that said
allowed the children to playing gameonline.

I’m

Sri Muthia Sari back to the house.

# MODERATOR

Well that’s the conclution of the affirmative team. Next I’ll call the third

speaker of the opposite team to deliver the conclution. Time is yours !

# THE 3
rd

SPEAKER OF THE OPPOSITE TEAM

Thanks for the ti

me that given to me, I’m Dhimas Jalu Prakoso as the last

speaker from opposite team, I want to deliver the conclusion of our team’s opinion.