Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Energy Corp.
Julian Castillo- April 2014
Stock Data
Price C$ 18.1
52- Week Range C$ 14.8 -23.43
Price US$ 16.5
Target Price US$ 26.77
NAV per share US$ 24.77
Shares Outstanding MM 325.3
Market Cap US$ MM 5,367.45
Total debt US$ 4,372
Total debt to Cap (Dec 2013) 51.2%
Summary & Recommendations:
Company Overview:
Investment Thesis:
Despite its proven track record and promising upside potential, the company is currently
being undervalued by the markets. In my opinion, the markets are over reacting to short
term production limitations which shouldn’t affect the company’s performance and
potential in the long run. The recent drop of more than 17% in the stock price came
after the company released its Q1 2014 results, which were affected by lower than
expected output levels at the Rubiales field and higher production costs. However,
these shortcomings are explained by two conjunctural issues:
There’s a heavy drought that has lowered water levels in a river near the
Rubiales field. In consequence local authorities are preventing Pacific from
disposing the water residues in the river, leaving no other option than to reduce
the output levels.
The guerillas bombed the Bicentenario oil pipeline earlier in the year forcing the
company to use alternative methods for transportation, which translated in higher
than expected production costs.
These two issues should get resolved in the near term and thus their effect would be
minimal in the upcoming quarters. Additionally, the overall reserve trends and daily
production levels keep increasing. The company should be able maintain strong cash
flow levels past 2016 when the Rubiales field license expires taking advantage of these
characteristics:
The Company has already started replacing the production from the Rubiales field and
plan in no counting on it after 2016 when the agreement with Ecopetrol expires. The
early planning and replacement of this field will allow the company to maintain its strong
production and revenue levels beyond 2016. As seen in the charts below, a
disagreement on a new contract to continue developing the Rubiales field shouldn’t hurt
the company’s income statement.
Innovation Led Growth:
Enhanced oil recovery- STAR: The company has confirmed that this
technology does work and they have been granted with two exclusive patents for
it. In addition the pilot program has been certified by independent auditors,
confirming it has at least doubled the oil recovery/extraction rate and reduced by
30 percent water residues. This technology gives the company the opportunity to
unlock a very large additional resource base and lower the production costs.
There’s a new contract being discussed with Ecopetrol for the Rubiales field
based on this technology. A positive outcome would translate in greater
production levels in the short term.
Opportunities in Mexico:
The recent energy reforms in Mexico create a big opportunity for increasing production.
The company has already started negotiating with PeMex for the creation of joint
ventures in onshore and heavy oil fields. They have identified 5 possible production
sites to start operating in 2015 if an agreement is reached with PeMex. This would
make Pacific one of the first independent companies operating in Mexico and would
allow for a rapid increase in production levels.
Valuation:
Comparable companies:
Pacific Rubiales valuation is very low relative to its peers with similar production and
reserves levels. It has lower EV/EBITDAX and EV/EBITDA than the comparable
companies, and it’s also at the low end of the EV/proved reserves and EV/ daily
production values.
Comparable Companies Valuation Statistics Capitalization Proved Daily R/P Enterprise Value /
Equity Enterprise Reserves Production Ratio EBITDAX EBITDA Proved Daily
Company Name Value Value (BBoe) (MMboe) (Years) Reserves Production
Ecopetrol $ 82,235 $ 72,762 1.9 0.6 8.1 6.5 x 6.7 x $ 39,080 $ 115,496
Talisman Energy $ 11,021 $ 15,825 1.0 0.4 7.0 16.3 x 22.2 x $ 16,222 $ 41,755
Nobel Energy Inc. $ 26,797 $ 31,608 1.4 0.3 13.1 8.7 x 9.8 x $ 22,480 $ 107,875
Hess Corporation $ 28,379 $ 33,605 1.4 0.3 11.1 4.9 x 5.8 x $ 24,673 $ 100,014
Maximum $ 82,235 $ 72,762 1.9 0.6 13.1 16.3 x 22.2 x $ 39,080 $ 115,496
75th Percentile $ 41,843 $ 43,394 1.5 0.4 11.6 10.6 x 12.9 x $ 28,275 $ 109,781
Median $ 27,588 $ 32,606 1.4 0.4 9.6 7.6 x 8.2 x $ 23,577 $ 103,945
25th Percentile $ 22,853 $ 27,662 1.3 0.3 7.8 6.1 x 6.5 x $ 20,916 $ 85,449
Minimum $ 11,021 $ 15,825 1.0 0.3 7.0 4.9 x 5.8 x $ 16,222 $ 41,755
Pacific Rubiales Energy $ 5,367 $ 8,755 0.6 0.1 12.5 3.0 x 3.4 x $ 14,286 $ 65,089
DCF Analysis
The DCF analysis suggests a per share price of $26.7 or 61.8% higher than the current
stock price of $16.5. This price is derived from a base case price scenario which
assumes $95 oil and $5 gas realization prices and conservative assumptions for FCF
projections. The valuation uses a WACC of 11.7% and a terminal value derived using
an EBITDAX multiple of 5x.
The DCF derived per share price was analyzed using three different oil and gas price
realization scenarios. The downside case assumes a $4.5 gas and $85.5 oil realization
prices, the base case assumes a $5 gas and $95 oil realization prices, and the upside
case $5.5 gas and $104.5 oil realization prices. The above chart shows that the DCF
valuation would yield a $42.2 per share price under de upside price scenario and the
lowest WACC, and a $14.21 per share price under the downside price scenario and the
highest WACC. The current market price would be achieved under the downside price
scenario and a WACC value higher than 12%.
The NAV analysis yields a per share price of $24.77 or 50% above the current market
price of $16.50. This approach estimates the present value of the proven reserves, with
the base case price scenario. It assumes that the company never increases its existing
reserves, so there is no additional CapEx in future years beyond what is required to
develop existing reserves. Additionally, this model includes the proceeds from the
probable spinoff of two non-production business segments: Pacific Infrastructure,
valued at $1,000 million, where the company has a 41.4% working interest and Pacific
Midstream, valued at $1,200 million. The Company is expecting a spinoff of these
Midstream and infrastructure assets in the short term, maintaining the strategic value
through take or pay contracts, and realize additional value for its shareholders.
Risks:
Decline in Oil and Gas prices: Pacific valuation is dependent on oil and gas
prices. Any sudden drop in these prices would compromise the revenue and
future cash flows of the company. This risk can be hedged by tacking a short
position in the USO or any other oil & gas based ETF.