Sunteți pe pagina 1din 26

ORBIT-INNOVA PROJECT

1
Table of Contents Project group
Decription of the site
Location
Current situation
Land owner of the site
SWOT analysis
YANG JINGXI DUAN MEIJIE LONG TENG Melika Baniasadi
Project vision China China China Spain/Iran
Business circularity
Material source
Stakeholders
Stakeholder circle
Gap analysis
Space quality Zuzanna Sazonow Anna Maria Chwaszczewska Dobrochna Anna Klimczak
Poland Poland Poland
Design of space
Area of the project
Land usage dr Guillermo Aranda-Mena
Mexico
Space Visualization Heritage Management - Economical Appraisal
2
Location of the project
The site chosen for the ORBIT-INNOVA project is located in the city
of Poznan and belongs to the ZNTK Nieruchomosci
(which states for Rolling Stock Repair Plant Real Estate).
It used to be the place of rolling stock repair site,
but now the buildings are abandoned and in bad condition.
In 2009 the place was full of life with 400 people working there,
but soon the strikes began and the company went bankrupt.
In the spring of 2014 it was planned to announce an architectural
and urban competition for the development of the land.
Eventually, it was put up for sale, but it did not change its owner.
The part of the site that our company intends to buy consists
of 9 buildings. Three of them with no historic value
wil be demolished, while the rest wil be renewed.

CITY OF POZNAN, POLAND 3


The site - Current situation

4
The site - Current situation

5
Land owner of the site

ZNTK real estate

Private
City of Poznan

6
SWOT Analysis
)

ex

7
Orbit-Innova is to educate and develop the
Project vision
culture while using recycled materials
such as raw materials obtained from the site
and reusable materials from the companies,
turning hem into furniture and using leftovers
to create pieces of art.
All of the outcome products are made in a way
that they could be redone and reconstructed
over and over again, creating a cicularity
of production.
The furniture made is inspired by manmade
natural disasters that are an outcome
of globalwarming.
lack of visitors

MATERIALS
From the site - metal, glass, bricks, steel
From private doners (everyone can donate
their old furniture)
Waste from big furniture companies
and factories
8
Business circularity

9
Pool Finance Sp. z o.o. Material source
purchase of steel and iron scrap
prchase of color materials
demolition of steel structures
bateries
wastepaper collection point -> purchase
WAWA - STAL Sp.j. Damian Wawrzyniak, Ludmila Wawrzyniak
purchase of scrap steel -> sale, purchase
KOLOR - METAL Skup metali Tadeusz Pacyna
industru and production/recyclabe materials
Hojan Renata Skup Butelek
bottle point collection
Stena Sp. z o.o. Zaklad Zlotomet Punkt Skupu Makulatury
wastepaper point collection
ZGO - BET Daniel Zgoda
construction waste
bottle point collection
styrofoam waste
LUPO Plast
plastic waste
WTORPLAST - RECYKLING
wastepaper point collection
floor coverings
10
The stakeholders circle Stakeholder circle
1 Processing plants
2 Government
3 Architects
4 Owner
4
5 Eco-companies 3
5
6 Society
2
7 Private inverstors
8 Art University of Poznan 1 6

9 Design studio
10 Environmental organizations
11 Furniture companies
11
7
The graph mainly shows at which stage these stakeholders will affect
8
our project. From the outside to the inside is the project from the beginning
to the completion stage. For example, we can see that the University of Art
10 9
is only involved in the later stages. However, relatively speaking, society
is paying attention to this project from the very beginning, and will always
influence the design and use of this project. The government will only
influence the project at the initial stage.

11
Stakeholder circle

In the second graph, they are divided into two circles


based on their relevance to the project. The inner
circle is primary stakeholders and the outer circle is
secondary stakeholders. For example, environmental
organizations only indirectly influence or participate
in the project because they do not participate in the
design, but they will give decision-making opinions,
which will affect the overall direction of the design.
According to this graph, we divided the stakeholders
into two categories and did a gap analysis on them.

12
We analyse the level of interest of those stakeholders in several different aspects, including Gap analysis
environment, education, art, social influence, profit, product usage and employment.
We show them in 2 separated diagrams, and they are divided according to inner and outer
stakeholders circles, which we provided above. For the furniture company we analyzed them
separately.

According to the diagram, we can see the difference and also commonalities among those
stakeholders. There are some interesting thing to speak about.
For example, we can see from the first diagram (inner circle) that all the stakeholders are
interested in protecting the environment, and the level is above medium. Social impact is also
a value that everyone is very interested in, but furniture companies seem less interested,
relatively speaking. Significant differences have arisen in the use of the product – both Primary stakeholders
the design associations and the furniture companies are very interested in it, but the other
stakeholders are obviously not very interested.

For the outer-stakeholders, they are all concerned about social influences, as most of them
are public organizations, while they are not very interested in product use and art, generally
speaking. In terms of environment and sustainability, everyone is also interested in it, besides
PKP and property owners, they are more interested in profits. Conversely, environmental
organizations are most interested in the environment and sustainability, and they are not
very interested in product use, art and profits. The government is similar to environmental
organizations. The difference is that the government also cares about profits, employment
and education, unlike environmental organizations. Secondary stakeholders
13
Gap analysis of furniture companies

In our project, we chose 4 furniture companies,


They are IKEA, FAMEG, ZIETA, TFR GROUP.
ZIETA, https://www.zieta.pl/process/

ZIETA is a furniture designer company, mainly


doing metal products. FAMEG is a Polish
furniture company. TFR is a company from the FAMEG, http://fameg.pl/
UK, and doing the sustainable mattress and
bed production using recycled materials.

TFR GROUP , http://www.tfrgroup.co.uk/

IKEA, https://www.ikea.com/us/en/

14
Gap analysis of furniture companies

The two companies ZIETA and FAMEG are more


interested in artistic innovation than the
other two. TFR is focused on the recycling
and reproduction of mattresses, so it is more
interested in the environment, sustainability
and technology, and ZIETA is also interested in
technology, because Oskar Zieta is doing high-
tech research to study the input of computer.
-controlled machines in processing of metal
sheets in the architecture and design. Of
course, these companies all value profits. TFR GROUP
FAMEG
ZIETA
IKEA
15
Space quality

16
Design of space

17
Area of the project

18
land Usage

19
Design of space

20
Space Visualization - Exterior space

21
Space Visualization - Exterior space

22
Space Visualization - Workshop

23
Space Visualization - Exhibition space

24
Space Visualization - Office

25
Space Visualization - Office box

26

S-ar putea să vă placă și