Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Section 4 Section 2(87) & Yes, use of total share capital rather than Equity
22.2
19 share capital
Section 23 New Para NA
Section 24 New Para NA
Section 30 New Para NA
Section 41 Section 2(55) 25.1 No
Section 60A Section 31 Yes, Now such companies as authorized by SEBI
27.6
can issue such prospectus
Section 60B Section 32 The new Act, 2013 only says about the filing of
red herring prospectus and final prospectus and
27.7
removes the filing of information memorandum as
given under the 1956 Act.
Section 62 Section 35 27.12 No
Section 63 Section 34 27.15 No
Section 64 Section 25 27.8 No
Section 68 Section 36 The 2013 Act prescribes punishment for falsely
inducing another person to enter into an agreement
27.16
to obtain credit facilities from any bank or
financial institution has also been provided.
Section 37 New Para NA
Section 38 New Para NA
Section 69 Section 39 Remaining rules as provided under such para (as
26.4
per Company Act 1956) are same
Section 73 Section 40 Remaining rules as provided under such para are
26.4
same
Section 77B Section 70 Under the Companies Act, 2013 now the company
can buy-back even if it has defaulted in the
repayment of deposit or interest thereon,
redemption of debentures or preference shares or
30.11 payment of dividend or repayment of any term
loan or interest thereon to any financial institution
or bank, provided the default has been remedied
and a period of 3 years have elapsed after such
default ceased to subsist. Whereas under the 1956
Act, prohibition on buy- back is ceased
By CA Amit Popli-Faculty ICAI & ETEN Satellite Classes for IPCC & Final
2
Chapter-1-Basic Concepts
1.1 PRIVATE COMPANIES [Section 2 (68)]
Meaning A private company is one
which has a minimum paid up capital of rupees one lakh or such higher paid
up capital as may be prescribed and
which by its Articles of Association, puts the following restrictions
Restriction-AOA 1 Restricts the right to transfer its shares, if any.
2 Limits the maximum number of its members to 200 (excluding the present
or past employees of the company).
3 Prohibits any invitation to the public to subscribe for any securities
PRACTICAL QUESTION
Quest Fortune Traders Ltd. Was registered as a private limited company. There are 224 members in
the company as noted below:
(i) Directors and their relatives 54
(ii) Employees 100
(iii) Ex-employees (shares were allotted when they were employees) 50
(iv) 5 couples holding shares jointly in the names of husband and wife (5 x 2) 10
(v) Others 15
The Board of Directors of the company proposes to convert it into a Public company. Only
because of the fact that its member has exceeds minimum prescribed criteria. Advise the Board
of directors?
Has a minimum paid up capital of rupees five lakh or such higher paid up
capital as may be prescribed
Provided that, a company which is a subsidiary of a company, not being a private
company, shall be deemed to be public company for the purposes of this Act even
where such subsidiary company continues to be a private company in its articles.
PRACTICAL QUESTION
Quest A Pvt Ltd is a company subsidiary to XYZ Ltd. Discuss the position in following cases:-
1. How much Paid up capital A Pvt Ltd shall have
2. Whether members of A Pvt Ltd can transfer their shares
3. A Pvt Ltd want to issue prospectus, will it be possible’
4. A Pvt Ltd provided a loan of Rs 1.0 :Lacs to Ajay for acquiring its shares
1.3 HOLDING AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES [Section 2(87)]
Meaning of A holding company is one which has the control over the other company
Holding & Holding Company which exercise control.
Subsidiary
Subsidiary Company A company on which said control is exercised.
As per the law there exist an holding and subsidiary relations between 2 companies
in following circumstances:-
As per the law there exist an holding and subsidiary relations between 2 companies in following
circumstances:-
1. Control over the Where one company controls the composition of the Board of Directors of another
composition of company. In such case former becomes the holding and the latter become a
board of directors : subsidiary company
When a company shall be considered to have control over the composition of
the Board of Directors of another company:-
If said company has the powers to appoint or remove all or majority of the
directors of the other company.
2. Holding of exercises or controls more than one-half of the total share capital either at its own or
majority of shares together with one or more of its subsidiary companies:
PRACTICAL QUESTION
Quest-1 The paid-up Share Capital of AVS Private Limited is `1 crore, consisting of 8 lacs Equity
Shares of `10 each, fully paid-up and 2 lacs Cumulative Preference Shares of `10 each, fully
paid-up. XYZ Private Limited and BCL Private Limited are holding 3 lacs Equity Shares and
1,50,000 Equity Shares respectively in AVS Private Limited. XYZ Private Limited and BCL
Private Limited are the subsidiaries of TSR Private Limited.
With reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, examines whether AVS Private
Limited is a subsidiary of TSR Private Limited? Would your answer be different if TSR
Private Limited has 8 out of total 10 directors on the Board of Directors of AVS Private
Limited?
Quest-2 A Ltd hold shares in B Ltd in fiduciary capacity i.e. as trustees for beneficiary. C Ltd. Discuss
the relationship between
A Ltd and B Ltd
A Ltd and C Ltd
Quest-3 Discuss about the position of Holding and Subsidiary in following cases
H Ltd S Ltd H Ltd has a right to appoint
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 3 directors of S Ltd
(c) where the subsidiary company is a shareholder even before it became a subsidiary
company of the holding company.
Special Note The subsidiary company referred to in the above exceptions shall have a right to
vote at a meeting of the holding company only in respect of the shares held by it as
a legal representative or as a trustee, as referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of the
said exceptions.
with Deemed to the issuing houses was made with a view to offer them to public in case:-
Prospectus (a) Shares were offered to the public for sale within 6 months after they were
allotted or agreed to be allotted to issuing house, or
(b) Whole consideration in respect of shares/debentures had not been received by
the company.
3. Matters to be Contents of prospectus
Stated in Deemed Liability in respect of mis -statements, in and omissions from prospectus,
Prospectus or otherwise relating to prospectus,
shall apply with the modifications
b) the prospectus was issued without his knowledge or consent, and that on
becoming aware of its issue, he forthwith gave a reasonable public notice
that it was issued without his knowledge or consent.
All the moneys received on application from public for subscription to the
securities shall be kept in a separate bank account. In case of default, the
company and every officer who is in default shall be punishable with fine/with
imprisonment/both.
1. No Buy Back A company cannot purchase its own shares through any subsidiary company
from Subsidiary including its own subsidiary company.
2. No buy Back A company cannot purchase its own shares through any investment company.
through a
Investment
company
3. No Default of Repayment of deposit or interest thereon,
Redemption of debentures or preference shares or
Payment of dividend or
Repayment of any term loan or interest thereon to any financial institution or
bank.
Special Note: - The prohibition is lifted if the default has been remedied and a
period of 3 years has elapsed after such default ceased to subsist.
4. No Non- filing of Annual Return (section 92),
Compliance of declaration of dividend (section 123) or
punishment for failure to distribute dividend (section 127) and
Preparation of financial statement (section 129)
Penalty for non- If any default is made, there the company shall be liable to pay a penalty of ten
compliance thousand rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be liable to
pay a penalty of five thousand rupees, for each default.
its articles, pay dividends in proportion to the amount paid-up on each share.
Power of Tribunal The Tribunal, while dealing with an appeal may, after hearing the parties, either
dismiss the appeal, or by order—
o direct that the transfer or transmission shall be registered by the company and
the company shall comply with such order within a period of ten days of the
receipt of the order; or
o direct rectification of the register and also direct the company to pay
damages, if any, sustained by any party aggrieved.
Incase of If a person contravenes the order of the Tribunal he shall be punishable with
Contravention imprisonment for a term not less than one year but may extend to three years and
with fine not be less than one lakh rupees but may extend to five lakh rupees.
Order of the The Tribunal may, after hearing the parties to the appeal by order, either
Tribunal dismiss the appeal or
direct rectification of the records of the depository or the register and direct
the company to pay damages, if any, sustained by the party aggrieved.
16
Other Points 1. The provisions of this section shall not restrict the right of a holder of
securities, to transfer such securities and any person acquiring such
securities shall be entitled to voting rights unless the voting rights have
been suspended by an order of the Tribunal.
Every defaulting officer is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6
months or fine which shall not be less than 25,000 rupees, but not exceeding 1 lakh
rupees or both.
Chapter-2-General Meeting
2.1 EXTRA ORDINARY GENERAL MEETING [Section 100]
1. Who can call? Extraordinary General Meeting may be called by
Board,
Requisitionists or
CLB.
2. EGM by Board 1. Suo motu The Board may, whenever it thinks fit, call an extraordinary
of Directors i.e. on their general meeting.
own
2. On Board on the requisition of the required number of the
Requisition of members can call an extraordinary general meeting. Required
the Members number of members will be as follows:
3. Meaning of Case A Members holding at least 10% of the paid up share capital of the
Required Numbers For company company,
having share
capital
CaseB Members having at least 1/10 of the total voting power
For company
having no
share capital
4. Requirement as 1 The requisition must contain all the matters for consideration of which the
to Requisition meeting is to be called.
PRACTICAL QUESTION
May-06 To remove the Managing Director, 40% members of Global Ltd. Submitted requisition
for holding extra-ordinary general meeting. The company failed to call the said meeting
and hence the requisitionists held the meeting. Since the Managing Director did not
allow the holding of meeting at the registered office of the Company, the said meeting
was held at some other place and a resolution for removal of the Managing Director
was passed. Examine the validity of the said meeting and resolution passed therein in
the light of the companies Act, 2013.
Hint It was held by the SC in case of LIC v Escorts that, Every shareholder of a company
has a right to requisition for an extraordinary general meeting. He is not bound to
disclose the reasons for the resolution to be proposed at the meeting.
Section 100 of the companies Act contains provisions regarding holding of
extraordinary general meetings. It provides that if directors fail to call a properly
requisitioned meeting, the requisitionists or such of the requisitionists as represent not
less than 1/10th of the total voting rights may call a meeting to be held on a date fixed
within 3 months of the date of the requisition.
Where a meeting is called by the requisitionists and the registered office is not made
available to them, still meeting will remain a valid meeting and Further, resolutions
properly passed at such a meeting, are binding on the company.
Thus, in the given case, since all the above mentioned provisions are duly complied
with. Hence the meeting with the resolution removing the managing director shall be
valid.
(b) in the case of a private company, two members personally present, shall be the
quorum for a meeting of the company
3. Who will be (i) A member of the company
considered as (ii) Authorized representative of a body corporate.
Member Personally
(iii) Representative of President/Governor of the state.
Present
20
PRACTICAL QUESTIONS
May-09- The articles of ABC Limited provided that only those shareholders would be entitled to vote
Modified whose names have been there on the Register of Members for two months before the date of
the meeting. X' a member, of the ABC Limited was holding 200 equity shares of the company. X
transferred his shares to Y before one month form the date on which the meeting was due. The
name of Y could not be entered in the Register of Members as the application of transfer of
shares was pending. Y attended the meeting but he was prohibited by the company from
exercising his voting right on the ground that he has not hold his shares for specified period as
provided in the articles before the date of the meeting.
State whether Y can exercise his voting right in the meeting? State also the grounds upon which
Y may be excluded from exercising his voting rights in the meeting of the shareholders.
Hint A public limited company can not impose any restriction on voting right of its members on any
ground other than those specified under section 106.
Since above ground of restriction is not covered under section 106, thus restriction so imposed
shall be invalid
Nov-05 C, a member of LS & Co. Ltd., holding some shares in his own name on which Final call money
has not been paid, is denied by the company voting right at a general meeting on the ground
that the articles of association do not permit a member to vote if he has not paid the calls on the
shares held by him. With reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, examine the
validity of company's denial to C of his voting right.
Hint Since restriction is imposed as per the ground as specified u/s 106, thus company is justified
May-10 J held 100 partly paid up shares of LKM Limited. The company asked him to pay the final call
money on the shares. Due to some unavoidable circumstances he was unable to pay the
amount of call money to the company. At a general meeting of the shareholders, the chairman
disallowed him to caste his vote on the ground that the articles do not permit a shareholder to
vote if he has not paid the calls on the shares held by him. J contested the decision of the
Chairman. Referring to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 decide whether the
contention of J is valid
Hint Since restriction is imposed as per the ground as specified u/s 106, thus company is justified
Proxy in Case of In absence thereof, first named joint holder should sign the proxy.
Joint Holdings?
8. Relationship The relationship between a member and his proxy is that of a principal and agent.
Between Member The proxy is bound to vote according to the directions of the member appointing
and Proxy him.
9. Inspection of Every member entitled to vote at a meeting of the company, or on any resolution to
Proxy be moved thereat, shall be entitled during the period beginning twenty-four hours
before the time fixed for the commencement of the meeting and ending with the
conclusion of the meeting, to inspect the proxies lodged, at any time during the
business hours of the company,
provided not less than three days’ notice in writing of the intention so to inspect is
given to the company.
10. Situation where Every officer of the company who knowingly issues the invitations as aforesaid or
an invitation are wilfully authorises or permits their issue shall be punishable with fine which may
issued at extend to one lakh rupees.
company’s However, an officer shall not be punishable whereby reason only of the issue to a
expenses member at his request in writing of a form of appointment naming the proxy, or of a
list of persons willing to act as proxies, if the form or list is available on request in
writing to every member entitled to vote at the meeting by proxy.
11. Revocation of 1 When a member appointing a proxy, personally attend the meeting.
Proxy
2 When a member appointing a proxy, appoint another proxy at a later date, in
such a case person appointed proxy subsequently shall be treated as proxy
3 Where intimation of death or insanity is received prior to commencement of
meeting (whether original or adjourned)
4 Where intimation of transfer of shares is received by company prior to
commencement of meeting (whether original or adjourned)
12. Rights of a 1 A proxy shall be entitled to vote in case of voting by poll even if an article does
Proxy not provide so
2 Proxy can vote on show of hand only of such power is expressly provided by
Article.
3 A proxy may demand for poll
PRACTICAL QUESTION
Nov-04 Annual General Meeting of a Public Company was scheduled to be held on 15.12.2003. Mr. A, a
shareholder, issued two Proxies in respect of the shares held by him in favour of Mr. 'X' and Mr.
'Y'. The proxy in favour of 'Y' was lodged on 12.12.2003 and the one in favour of Mr. X was
lodged on 15.12.2003. The company rejected the proxy in favour of Mr. Y as the proxy in
favour of Mr. Y was of dated 12.12.2003 and thus in favour of Mr. X was of dated 15.12.2003.
Is the rejection by the company in order?
Hint As per Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013 a proxy should be deposited 48 hours before
the time of the meeting. In the given case, the proxies should have, therefore, been deposited
on or before 13.12.2003 (the date of the meeting being 15.12.2003). X deposited the proxy
on 15.12.2003.
Therefore, proxy in favour of Mr. X has become invalid. Thus, rejecting the proxy in favour
of Mr. Y is unsustainable. Proxy in favour of Y is valid since it is deposited in time.
May-08 The Chairman of the meeting of a company received a Proxy 54 hours before the time fixed for
the start of the meeting. He refused to accept the Proxy on the ground that the Articles of the
company provided that a Proxy must be filed 60 hours before the start of the meeting. Decide,
under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 whether the Proxy holder can compel the
Chairman to admit the Proxy?
Hint As per Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013 proxy shall be deposited with the company
within 48 hours before the meeting.
Any provisions contained in the Articles of a company that requires a longer period than 48
hours before a meeting of the company for depositing a proxy shall be void. Thus contention of
Mr X is valid
May-10 K, a member of MNO Limited, appoints L as his proxy to attend the general meeting of the
company. Later he (K) also attends the meeting. Both K (the member) and L (the proxy) voted
on a particular resolution in the meeting. K's vote was declared invalid by the chairman stating
that since he has appointed the proxy and L's vote has been considered as valid. K objects to the
decision of the Chairman. Decide, under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 whether K's
objection shall be taxable.
Hint Decision by Chairman is invalid. Since K i.e. a member himself attended a meeting and voted on
resolution, it will amount to revocation of proxy. Thus any vote put by L i.e. proxy shall be
invalid
specified in the notice calling the general meeting or other intimation given to
the members.
PRACTICAL QUESTION
Nov-05 At a General meeting of a company, a matter was to be passed by a special resolution. Out of
40 members present, 20 voted in favour of the resolution, 5 voted against it and 5 votes were
found invalid. The remaining 10 members abstained from voting. The Chairman of the meeting
declared the resolution as passed.
With reference to the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, examine the validity of the
Chairman's declaration.
Hint In the given problem, the votes cast in favour (20) being more than 3 times of the votes cast
against (5), if other conditions of Section 114 are satisfied, the decision of the Chairman is in
order.
Nov-07 For a special resolution in a Company's general meeting, 10 voted in favour, 2 against and 4
abstained. The chairman declared the resolution as passed. Is it a valid resolution as per the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013
Hint The Resolution which is passed is a valid Special Resolution.