Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.

com>

Plaintiff Response/Emergency Motion - HARIHAR v WELLS FARGO, et

al, Docket No. 1981cv00050
Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com> Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:59 PM
To: Arthur T Deguglielmo <arthur.deguglielmo@jud.state.ma.us>
Cc: "Constituent.services@state.ma.us" <constituent.services@massmail.state.ma.us>,
governor.schedule@state.ma.us, dan_jackson@ao.uscourts.gov, NewYorkComplaints Dojoig
<dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, theresa watson3 <theresa.watson3@usdoj.gov>, andrew lelling
<andrew.lelling@usdoj.gov>, mary murrane <mary.murrane@usdoj.gov>, christina sterling
<christina.sterling@usdoj.gov>, Susan Goldberg <susan_goldberg@ca1.uscourts.gov>, elizabeth warren
<elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov>, sydney levin-epstein <sydney_levin-
epstein@markey.senate.gov>, ayanna pressley <ayanna.pressley@mail.house.gov>, lori trahan
<lori.trahan@mail.house.gov>, maura.healey@state.ma.us, jesse.boodoo@state.ma.us, igo-
fightfraud@state.ma.us, ma-igo-general-mail@state.ma.us, Nairoby Gabriel
<Nairoby_Gabriel@warren.senate.gov>, Nora Keefe <Nora_Keefe@warren.senate.gov>, "Jeffrey B.
Loeb" <JLoeb@richmaylaw.com>, david fialkow <david.fialkow@klgates.com>

Clerk Deguglielmo,

Please be advised - the following Plaintiff RESPONSE/Emergency Motion is attached for filing in
the above-referenced Docket. Hardcopies are also being mailed to the Court and to counsel of
record. Due to the severity of evidenced criminal violations involving Middlesex Superior Court
Judge - Hon. Janice W. Howe - and the relationship to ongoing Federal litigation involving the
Defendant - Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-
cv-1188), the following Government Offices/Agencies are necessarily copied on this email
communication: (1) Governor Charlie Baker’s Office; (2) The Department of Justice (DOJ); (3)
Members of Congress; (4) MA Attorney General Maura Healey; (5) The White House via
www.whitehouse.gov; and also (6) Counsel for the named Defendants. The Plaintiff respectfully
states that based on his interpretation of the law, IF this Emergency Motion is not properly filed and
entered upon the docket, it will evidence incremental violations to 18 U.S. Code § 1512(b)(2)(A) and
18 USC § 2071. Copies of this REPLY/Emergency Motion will also be made available to the Public
and to media outlets nationwide for documentation purposes and out of continued concerns for my
personal safety and security. If the Court has ANY questions regarding any portion of this
REPLY/Emergency Motion, or if additional information is required, the Plaintiff is happy to provide
upon request. The Plaintiff is grateful for the Court’s attention to this very serious and sensitive
matter.

Respectfully submitted,

Mohan a. Harihar

Plaintiff – Pro Se

Plaintiff EMERGENCY Motion to REMOVE Disqualified Judge - Hon Janice W Howe.pdf

417K
 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
MIDDLESEX SUPERIOR COURT

) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1981-CV-00050

MOHAN A HARIHAR )
)
Plaintiff )
)
v. )
)
WELLS FARGO NA, et al. )
)
Defendants )
)
)

PLAINTIFF RESPONSE TO VOID ORDERS (DOCUMENT NO.’S 38 AND 39)

PURSUANT TO MASS. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(4) AND EMERGENCY MOTION TO

REMOVE DISQUALIFIED JUDICIAL OFFICER – HON. JANICE W. HOWE

After reviewing the VOID orders associated with Document No.’s 38 and 39, the Plaintiff –

MOHAN A. HARIHAR, a pro se litigant with no legal experience, respectfully files this

Response and Emergency Motion under Mass. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4), warranting (at minimum)

immediate intervention by: (1) this Middlesex Superior Court; (2) Federal Prosecutors; and (3)

Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA). A review of the record reveals that DISQUALIFIED

Middlesex Superior Court Judge – Hon. Janice W. Howe has consciously chosen to continue

issuing orders WITHOUT JURISDICTION; completely ignoring ALL evidenced claims of

record brought against her. These evidenced claims include (but are not limited to) violations

under ARTICLE III AND 18 U.S. CODE § 2381 – Judicial Treason. Due to the severity of

evidenced violations involving this judicial officer (and its relationship to ongoing Federal
litigation1), the Plaintiff also documented these evidenced violations in emails sent directly to:

(1) the Court Clerk – Arthur Deguglielmo; (2) Governor Baker’s Office; (3) The Department

of Justice (DOJ); (4) Members of Congress; (5) MA Attorney General Maura Healey; and (6)

The White House via www.whitehouse.gov.

A recap of events – beginning with the filed Reply to Void Order Issued on 10-3-2019 by

Disqualified Judicial Officer - Hon. Janice W. Howe (Ref. Document No. 37), identifies the

following:

I. Judicial Violations to ARTICLE III AND 18 U.S. CODE § 2381 – The Plaintiff’s

referenced Reply associated with Document No. 37 identifies Judge Howe’s decision to

blatantly ignore the evidenced claims brought against her, choosing instead to continue

issuing order(s) without jurisdiction. This evidenced act of judicial treason is identical to

the patterns of corrupt conduct identified in the related Federal litigation, the most

recent example of which includes (but is not limited to) the issued (VOID) orders by

RECUSED/DISQUALIFIED US District Court Judge – Hon. Allison Dale Burroughs.2

In addition to the evidenced Treason claim(s), the record also evidences that Judge Howe

stands formally accused of the following civil/criminal violations:

1. Judicial Fraud on the Court under Fed. R. Civ. P 60(b)(3);

2. Civil (and Criminal) RICO violations under (at minimum) 18 U.S. Code § 1964;
3. Color of Law violations under 18 U.S. Code § 242;
4. Due Process violations under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments;
5. Ignoring ARTICLE III, 18 U.S.C. § 2381 and 28 U.S.C. § 1446 - as it pertains to
the referenced Federal litigation;
6. Refusing to Recuse;
7. 18 U.S. Code § 2076 - by instructing a Court Clerk – Arthur Deguglielmo not
to accept or Docket filed documents by the Plaintiff;

1
References the $42B Federal Lawsuit – HARIHAR v US BANK, et al (Docket No. 15-cv-11880) which includes
the Defendant – COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
2
Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK, et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880 [ECF. No. 163].
 8. Unnecessary Judicial Delay;
9. Failure to acknowledge and uphold Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure
60(b)(3) - Fraud on the Court, as it pertains to evidenced (and UNOPPOSED)
claims against named Defendants;
10. Ignoring ELEVEN (11) judicial recusals of record (9 Federal, 2 State, all related
to this litigation) and their impact to associated judgements;
11. Refusing to accept the Plaintiff’s arguments as FACT, refusing DISCOVERY
and Refusing to Allow the Plaintiff to Depose Witnesses;
12. Refusing to acknowledge that: (1) the Department of Justice (DOJ); (2) MA
Office of the Attorney General (MA AGO); and (3) Federal Bank Regulators –
have ALL identified the Plaintiff’s referenced Foreclosure as ILLEGAL;
13. Refusing to re-establish a balance of hardships;
14. Refusing to Acknowledge Public Perception and the MASSACHUSETTS
CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT; and
15. Ignoring Continued Concerns for the Plaintiff’s Personal Safety and Security

II. VOID Order Issued November 14, 2019 (Ref. Document No. 38) – After more than one

(1) month had passed, disqualified Judge Janice W. Howe issued an incremental (VOID)

order, Document No. 38 on 11/14/19 - DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS'

MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The judge’s void order offers no explanation,

argument or denial of a single misconduct claim (referenced above) evidenced against her –

and no explanation of how she could possibly have the jurisdiction to issue such an order.

EVEN IF jurisdiction was not an issue – EVERY SINGLE argument presented by the

Defendants has been entirely disproven, including res judicata. This latest judicial

failure(s) in the Middlesex Superior Court exemplifies the continued efforts to brush aside

all of the Plaintiff’s evidenced arguments in order to arrive at a corrupt and pre-

determined outcome.

III. Formal Treason Claims Reported on 11-15-19 to Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA) –

Just ONE (1) day after Judge Howe’s void order was entered onto the docket, the Plaintiff

necessarily reported – as required by Federal Law, the incremental violations to

ARTICLE III AND 18 U.S. CODE § 2381, in a formal letter (via email communication)
 directed to Massachusetts Governor – Charlie Baker (R-MA).3 Additional parties copied

on the email communication to Gov. Baker included: (1) an officer of this Court –

specifically, Superior Court Clerk Arthur Deguglielmo; (2) The Department of Justice

(DOJ); (3) Members of Congress; (4) MA Attorney General Maura Healey; and (5) The

White House via www.whitehouse.gov.

IV. VOID Dismissal Order Issued November 21, 2019 – Despite the evidenced record and

documented communications informing this Court of these serious – and irrefutable

criminal violations, Judge Howe consciously decided to again disregard all of these

evidenced claims entirely, offering no explanation and instead issuing a (VOID) dismissal

order (Document No. 39). Based on this new evidence of record (citing also Judicial Fraud

upon the Court and egregious judicial misconduct), the Plaintiff has shown cause (and has

necessarily filed a motion) to amend his referenced Federal complaint against the Defendant

– Commonwealth of Massachusetts under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(2), (3) and (4).

I. MISPRISION of TREASON under 18 U.S. CODE § 2382 – The Plaintiff has similarly

filed a motion in the Federal Court, bringing incremental claims of Misprision of Treason

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(2) and 18 U.S. CODE § 2382, against: (1) ALL named

Defendants; (2) their retained counsel of record; and (3) referenced Clerks of the Court,

who as a matter of record have witnessed, along with the Plaintiff, an act(s) of Treason

against The United States – committed by a disqualified Judicial Officer(s) of this

Middlesex Superior Court and have chosen NOT to report it:

3
See Exhibit 1 – to view the formal letter delivered on November 15, 2019, to Gov. Charlie Baker (R-MA) via
email communication, informing him of evidenced violations to ARTICLE III and 18 U.S. CODE § 2381 –
Judicial Treason, by Middlesex Superior Court Judge – Hon. Janice W. Howe. Middlesex Superior Court Clerk -
Arthur Deguglielmo was copied on the referenced email to Governor Baker.
 “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the

commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be,

disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States,

or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision

of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or

both.”

As a matter of record, the Plaintiff has now filed an Emergency Motion in the related

Federal litigation, bringing incremental Misprision of Treason claims against: (1) Bank

Defendants – WELLS FARGO/US BANK; (2) Defendant – David E. Fialkow, Esq.

(K&L Gates, LLP); (3) Defendant – MERS, Inc.; (4) Defendants - Jeffrey/Isabelle Perkins;

(4) Counsel for the Perkins’ and MERS – Jeffrey B. Loeb (Rich May, PC); and (5)

Defendant – Commonwealth of Massachusetts/Clerk Arthur Deguglielmo, based on the

evidenced Treason violations committed by Middlesex County Superior Court Judge –

Hon. Janice W. Howe.

V. Cause to Amend the Related Federal Complaint - Civil (and Criminal) RICO violations

(at minimum) under 18 U.S. Code § 1964 – The evidenced Misprision claims against all

referenced parties contributes to existing arguments that show the intention to collude with

disqualified judicial officers for the purpose of reaching a corrupt and pre-determined

outcome – that begins with defrauding the Plaintiff of his HOMESTEAD. Additional

evidence includes the mailed hardcopy associated with Document No. 39, which was signed
 by Clerk Arthur Deguglielmo, indicating his alignment with a disqualified judicial

officer and his decision NOT to report judge’s evidenced crimes of record.4

VI. Cause to Amend Original Complaint here under Mass. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(2), (3) and (4) –

For the reasons referenced above, the Plaintiff shows cause to expand upon his Rule 60(b)

arguments that indicate: (1) the named Defendants; (2) their retained counsel of record; (3)

referenced disqualified judicial officers; (4) referenced Clerks are purposefully trying to

deceive or commit Fraud Upon this Court. Similarly, the Plaintiff has clearly evidenced

egregious judicial abuse of power by Judge Howe, showing cause to expand upon existing

arguments under Mass. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) and a judgement that is clearly VOID.

Judicial Immunity is considered WAIVED when Judicial Fraud has been evidenced under

Rule 60.5

VII. Tampering violations under 18 U.S. Code § 1512(b)(2)(A) – Based on the evidenced

claims of record that show that referenced documents filed by the Plaintiff were not entered

upon the docket, showing cause to bring Tampering violations against Judge Howe and

Clerk Arthur Deguglielmo under 18 U.S. Code § 1512(b)(2)(A):

“Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person,

or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent

to withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official

proceeding.”

4
See Exhibit 2, which shows the VOID Summary Judgement Order, signed on 11/21/2019 by Middlesex Superior
Court Clerk – Arthur Deguglielmo.
5
Similarly, Sovereign Immunity, as well as Litigation Privilege is also considered waived when Fraud on the
Court violations have been evidenced under Rule 60.
 Similarly, the Plaintiff respectfully states that IF this Emergency Motion is not properly filed

and entered upon the docket, it will evidence incremental violations to 18 U.S. Code

§ 1512(b)(2)(A) and also 18 USC § 2071:

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys,

or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding,

map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of

any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer

of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three

years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document,

paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates,

falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than

three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office

under the United States…”

Based on these evidenced claims of record, it is clearly necessary for this Court, along with

Federal Prosecutors, the MA AGO and the Governor Baker’s Office to intervene in this matter to

prevent Judge Howe (and other officers of the Court) from causing further harm and damage.

Finally, the Plaintiff – while under no obligation to do so, states for the record that he has IN

GOOD FAITH, offered ALL Defendant parties (including the Defendant – Commonwealth of
Massachusetts in the related Federal litigation) the opportunity to reach a mutual agreement.

However, no agreement has been made at this stage with ANY party.

Aside from the above-referenced government offices/agencies, copies of this

REPLY/Emergency Motion will be made available to the Public and to media outlets

nationwide for documentation purposes and out of continued concerns for my personal safety

and security. If the Court has ANY questions regarding any portion of this REPLY/Emergency

Motion, or if additional information is required, the Plaintiff is happy to provide upon request.

The Plaintiff is grateful for the Court’s attention to this very serious matter.

Respectfully submitted,

Mohan a. Harihar
Plaintiff – Pro Se
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
November 29, 2019 Mo.harihar@gmail.com
Exhibit 1
 Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>

FORMAL TREASON CLAIM(S) REPORTED TO THE OFFICE

MASSACHUSETTS GOVERNOR CHARLIE BAKER (R-MA)
Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com> Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:08 AM
To: "Constituent.services@state.ma.us" <constituent.services@massmail.state.ma.us>,
governor.schedule@state.ma.us
Cc: maura.healey@state.ma.us, jesse.boodoo@state.ma.us, dan_jackson@ao.uscourts.gov, Susan
Goldberg <susan_goldberg@ca1.uscourts.gov>, NewYorkComplaints Dojoig
<dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, theresa watson3 <theresa.watson3@usdoj.gov>, andrew lelling
<andrew.lelling@usdoj.gov>, mary murrane <mary.murrane@usdoj.gov>, christina sterling
<christina.sterling@usdoj.gov>, elizabeth warren <elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov>, sydney levin-
epstein <sydney_levin-epstein@markey.senate.gov>, ayanna pressley
<ayanna.pressley@mail.house.gov>, lori trahan <lori.trahan@mail.house.gov>, igo-
fightfraud@state.ma.us, ma-igo-general-mail@state.ma.us, Arthur T Deguglielmo
<arthur.deguglielmo@jud.state.ma.us>, david fialkow <david.fialkow@klgates.com>, "Jeffrey B. Loeb"
<JLoeb@richmaylaw.com>, Nairoby Gabriel <Nairoby_Gabriel@warren.senate.gov>, Nora Keefe
<Nora_Keefe@warren.senate.gov>

A LETTER TO GOVERNOR CHARLIE

BAKER (R-MA)

November 15, 2019

Governor Charlie Baker

Massachusetts State House
Office of the Governor, Rm 280
25 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02133

RE: FORMAL TREASON CLAIM BROUGHT AGAINST DISQUALIFIED JUDICIAL OFFICER -

HON. JANICE W. HOWE

Dear Governor Baker:

It is with regret that I must report to your direct attention (and as required under ARTICLE III and 18
U.S. CODE § 2381), a witnessed act of JUDICIAL TREASON by disqualified Middlesex Superior
Court Judge - Janice W. Howe, who apparently on November 1, 2019, issued a (VOID) dismissal
order without jurisdiction or just cause (since as a matter of record, the argument of res judicata was
completely disproven, Ref. HARIHAR v WELLS FARGO et al, Docket No. 1981-cv-00050, #38,
attached below). It is unclear as to why the VOID judicial order only posted to the Massachusetts
Trial Court Website nearly two (2) weeks later on November 14, 2019. This latest judicial failure
adds incrementally to the systemic abuses of judicial power - evidenced here in Massachusetts State
Courts as well as in related Federal litigation (First Circuit, Ref. HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket
No. 15-cv-11880), that includes the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as a DEFENDANT. As a
matter of record, Judge Howe's assignment to this MA State civil lawsuit came only after the sua
sponte recusal of the Hon. Kenneth J. Fishman - who evidenced the same patterns of corrupt
conduct prior to his recusal. The record will show that Judge Howe was similarly asked to recuse
herself and refused to do so.

Also serving as witnesses to this (second) criminal violation to ARTICLE III and 18 U.S. CODE
§ 2381 is: (1) the Court Clerk - Arthur Deguglielmo; (2) Defendant - WELLS FARGO; (3) Defendant -
US BANK; (4) Counsel for Bank Defendants - David E. Fialkow, Esq. (K&L Gates, LLP); (5)
Defendants - Jeffrey and Isabelle Perkins; (6) Defendant - MERS Inc.; and (7) Counsel for the
Perkins' and MERS - Jeffrey B. Loeb, Esq. (Rich May, PC). Therefore, the witness requirement (2) for
filing a formal Treason claim is satisfied. In addition to notifying your office, the White House will also
be formally be notified (via www.whitehouse.gov) as will the Middlesex Superior Court via a filed
RESPONSE to the VOID Order. A copy of this letter will be included as an attachment to the filed
response for documentation purposes.

In addition to the evidenced Treason claim(s), the record also evidences that Judge Howe stands
formally accused of the following civil/criminal violations:

1. Judicial Fraud on the Court under Fed. R. Civ. P 60(b)(3);

2. Civil (and Criminal) RICO violations under (at minimum) 18 U.S. Code § 1964;
3. Color of Law violations under 18 U.S. Code § 242;
4. Due Process violations under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments;
5. Ignoring ARTICLE III, 18 U.S.C. § 2381 and 28 U.S.C. § 1446 - as it pertains to the
referenced Federal litigation;
6. Refusing to Recuse;
7. 18 U.S. Code § 2076 - by instructing a Court Clerk not to accept or Docket filed
documents by the Plaintiff;
8. Unnecessary Judicial Delay;
9. Failure to acknowledge and uphold Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) -
Fraud on the Court, as it pertains to evidenced (and UNOPPOSED) claims against named
Defendants;
10. Ignoring ELEVEN (11) judicial recusals of record (9 Federal, 2 State, all related to this
litigation) and their impact to associated judgements;
11. Refusing to accept the Plaintiff’s arguments as FACT, refusing DISCOVERY and Refusing to
Allow the Plaintiff to Depose Witnesses;
12. Refusing to acknowledge that: (1) the Department of Justice (DOJ); (2) MA Office of the
Attorney General (MA AGO); and (3) Federal Bank Regulators – have ALL
identified the Plaintiff’s referenced Foreclosure as ILLEGAL;
13. Refusing to re-establish a balance of hardships;
14. Refusing to Acknowledge Public Perception and the MASSACHUSETTS CODE OF
JUDICIAL CONDUCT; and
15. Ignoring Continued Concerns for the Plaintiff’s Personal Safety and Security

Please be advised, for the reasons described above, these evidenced criminal violations by a
Massachusetts State Judicial Officer show cause for legal action from your office, the MA AGO and
Federal Prosecutors. There is also cause to amend the original complaint against the Commonwealth
in the above-referenced Federal Lawsuit - HARIHAR v US BANK et al, Docket No. 15-cv-11880.
ANY American or Resident of this Commonwealth should consider these evidenced judicial abuses of
power - an absolute DISGRACE to the (State and Federal) Judicial Branch(s) of Government and
should NEVER be tolerated. Respectfully - to be clear, you are NOT being asked to interfere with any
ongoing litigation. You are - as required by Federal law, being informed of an evidenced,
criminal act of TREASON committed by a Middlesex Superior Court Judge.

Finally, Governor Baker, you are respectfully reminded that on November 6, 2019, you were copied
on an email to MA Attorney General Maura Healey and Asst. AG Jesse M. Boodoo, Esq.,
(representing counsel for the Defendants - Commonwealth of Massachusetts and former AG Martha
Coakley) in the above-referenced Federal lawsuit. The email included an opportunity to reach a
mutual agreement - offered by the Plaintiff to the Commonwealth and the former AG, as a sign of his
continued GOOD FAITH. However, it is concerning that as a matter of professional courtesy there
has been no reply from the MA AGO. As I now begin to prepare a Motion to Amend the original
Federal complaint against the Commonwealth, please have Attorney General Healey provide a timely
response as to whether or not the Commonwealth wishes to enter into a mutual agreement
discussion.

Thank you - Governor Baker, for your attention to this very serious and sensitive criminal matter.
Parties copied on this email communication will include: (1) The White House (via
www.whitehouse.gov); (2) The Department of Justice (DOJ); (3) The US Attorney's Office (MA); (4)
Members of Congress; (5) The Office of the First Circuit Executive and the Administrative Office of
US Courts - due to the related crimes and systemic judicial failures evidenced in the First Circuit; (6)
Middlesex Superior Court Clerk Arthur Deguglielmo; and (7) Representing counsel for the named
Defendants referenced above. A copy will also be made available to the Public and to media sources
Nationwide for documentation purposes and out of continued concerns for my personal safety and
security. Thank you for your attention to this very serious and sensitive legal matter.

Respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
Plaintiff
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
mo.harihar@gmail.com
Exhibit 2
 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 29, 2019, I filed the foregoing REPLY/Emergency Motion
with the Clerk of the Court and to counsel for the Defendants (listed below) via US Mail and
Email Communication:

Jeffrey B. Loeb, Esq.

Rich May, PC
176 Federal Street
Boston, MA 02110
617.556.3871
JLoeb@richmaylaw.com

David E. Fialkow
K&L Gates, LLP
State Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
david.fialkow@klgates.com

Mohan a. Harihar
Plaintiff – Pro Se
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com