100%(2)100% au considerat acest document util (2 voturi)
5K vizualizări3 pagini
The key differences between traditional HRM and SHRM are:
1) Traditional HRM focuses on governing manpower in an organization reactively and with a fragmented approach, while SHRM takes a proactive and integrated approach to align human resource strategies with business goals.
2) Responsibility in traditional HRM lies with staff specialists, whereas in SHRM line managers are responsible for workforce management.
3) Traditional HRM has a short-term focus on capital/products and follows changes, while SHRM has a long-term focus on people/knowledge and initiates changes.
Descriere originală:
The difference between Traditional and Strategic Human Resource Management.
The key differences between traditional HRM and SHRM are:
1) Traditional HRM focuses on governing manpower in an organization reactively and with a fragmented approach, while SHRM takes a proactive and integrated approach to align human resource strategies with business goals.
2) Responsibility in traditional HRM lies with staff specialists, whereas in SHRM line managers are responsible for workforce management.
3) Traditional HRM has a short-term focus on capital/products and follows changes, while SHRM has a long-term focus on people/knowledge and initiates changes.
The key differences between traditional HRM and SHRM are:
1) Traditional HRM focuses on governing manpower in an organization reactively and with a fragmented approach, while SHRM takes a proactive and integrated approach to align human resource strategies with business goals.
2) Responsibility in traditional HRM lies with staff specialists, whereas in SHRM line managers are responsible for workforce management.
3) Traditional HRM has a short-term focus on capital/products and follows changes, while SHRM has a long-term focus on people/knowledge and initiates changes.
The differences between Traditional HRM and SHRM can be drawn clearly on the following grounds:
1. The governance of manpower of the organisation in a thorough and
structured manner is called Human Resource Management or HRM. A managerial function which implies framing of HR strategies in such a way to direct employee’s efforts towards the goals of an organisation is known as SHRM. 2. The process of Traditional HRM is reactive in nature. On the other hand, SHRM is a proactive management function. 3. In Traditional HRM, the responsibility of manpower lies with the staff specialists, whereas in strategic human resource management, the task of managing the workforce, is vested in the line managers. 4. Traditional HRM follows fragmented approach, which stresses on applying management principles while managing people in an organisation. As against this, SHRM follows an integrated approach, which involves lining up of business strategy with the company’s HR practices. 5. Traditional HRM emphasises on employee relations, ensuring employees motivation, and also the firm conforms to the necessary employment laws. Conversely, SHRM focuses on a partnership with internal and external constituent groups. 6. Traditional HRM supports short-term business goals and outcomes, but SHRM supports long-term goals and results of business. 7. In Traditional HRM, the human resource manager plays the role of change follower, i.e. he/she responses to change, hence pursues transactional leadership style. As opposed to SHRM, the human resource manager is a change leader, i.e. an imitator, thus seeks transformational leadership. 8. The primary element in Traditional HRM is the capital and products, but people and their knowledge are the building blocks of SHRM. 9. If we talk about accountability, a Traditional HRM is a cost centre. Unlike a strategic HRM which is an investment centre. 10.In Traditional HRM, stringent control over employees is exercised. As against this, in strategic human resource management, no such control is imposed, rather the rules for managing manpower is lenient. BASIS FOR HRM SHRM COMPARISON
Meaning Human resource SHRM is a managerial
management (HRM) function which implies implies the governance of framing of HR strategies in manpower of the such a way to direct organization in a thorough employees efforts towards and structured manner. the goals of organization.
Nature Reactive Proactive
Responsibility lies Staff specialist Line manager
with
Approach Fragmented Integrated
Scope Concerned with employee Concerned with internal and
relations external relations
Time horizon Short term Long term
Basic factor Capital and products People and knowledge
Summary: Who Moved My Cheese?: An A-Mazing Way to Deal with Change in Your Work and in Your Life by Spencer Johnson M.D. and Kenneth Blanchard: Key Takeaways, Summary & Analysis
HBR's 10 Must Reads 2023: The Definitive Management Ideas of the Year from Harvard Business Review (with bonus article "Persuading the Unpersuadable" By Adam Grant)