Katie Cox Clinical Practice Evaluation 2 - Single Placement

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 2S
Katie Cox 20446379

TEACHER CANDIDATE NAME______________________________ STUDENT NUMBER____________________
Bachelor of Science in Elementary Education

PROGRAM: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ELM-490 8/26/2019 12/8/2019

COURSE: _____________________________________________________ START DATE: ____________________________ END DATE: _____________________
River Elementary
COOPERATING SCHOOL NAME: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ohio
SCHOOL STATE: ___________________________________
Jennifer Isaly
COOPERATING TEACHER/MENTOR NAME: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
Richard Whitehead
GCU FACULTY SUPERVISOR NAME: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

EVALUATION 2S TOTAL
POINTS 95.04 points 95.04 %
25 2,500.00 2376 100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
100
0 0 0 0 0
Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

No Evidence Ineffective Foundational Emerging Proficient Distinguished
(The GCU Faculty (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Teacher Candidates within (Target level for Teacher (Usually reserved for master
Supervisor should create a this range require a this range require a this range may benefit from a Candidates) Teacher Candidates)
plan with the Teacher Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan) Professional Growth Plan)
Candidate to determine
how the Teacher Candidate
will meet this standard in
future evaluations)
No Evidence 1 to 49 50 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 92 93 to 100
There is no evidence that The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the The performance of the
the performance of the Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate is Teacher Candidate meets Teacher Candidate
Teacher Candidate met this insufficient in meeting this underdeveloped in meeting developing in meeting this this standard and consistently exceeds this
standard or expectations standard and expectations this standard and standard and expectations for expectations for a Teacher standard and all
for a Teacher Candidate for a Teacher Candidate expectations for a Teacher a Teacher Candidate during Candidate during student expectations for a Teacher
during student teaching. during student teaching. Candidate during student student teaching. teaching. Candidate during student
teaching. teaching.
Standard 1: Student Development Score No Evidence

1.1
Teacher candidates create developmentally appropriate instruction that takes into account individual students’ 94 1.00
strengths, interests, and needs and enables each student to advance and accelerate his or her learning.
1.2
Teacher candidates collaborate with families, communities, colleagues, and other professionals to promote 94
student growth and development. 1.00
Evidence
(The GCU Faculty Supervisor should detail the evidence or lack of evidence from the Teacher Candidate in meeting this standard. For lack of evidence, please provide suggestions
for improvement and the actionable steps for growth. )
Katie Uses multiple modalities to teach content such as visual, auditory, kinesthetic and tactile. This lesson included a song, graphic demonstrations, and hands on learning.
Katie mentioned, when applicable, she Collaborates with grade/subject level team members to share ideas, activities, and resources
Katie Cox 20446379


Candidate to determine
how the Teacher Candidate
will meet this standard in
future evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Standard 2: Learning Differences Score No Evidence

2.1
Teacher candidates design, adapt, and deliver instruction to address each student’s diverse learning strengths 93 1.00
and needs and create opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning in different ways.
2.2
Teacher candidates incorporate language development tools into planning and instruction, including strategies
for making content accessible to English language students and for evaluating and supporting their 94 1.00
development of English proficiency.
2.3
Teacher candidates access resources, supports, specialized assistance and services to meet particular learning 95 1.00
differences or needs.
Evidence
Katie Differentiates instruction as needed, as well as Provides visuals throughout lessons to help make connections. This was evident multiple times throughout the lesson.
Katie Cox 20446379


Candidate to determine how
the Teacher Candidate will
meet this standard in future
evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Standard 3: Learning Environments Score No Evidence

3.1
Teacher candidates manage the learning environment to actively and equitably engage students by organizing, 96 1.00
allocating, and coordinating the resources of time, space, and students’ attention.
3.2
Teacher candidates communicate verbally and nonverbally in ways that demonstrate respect for and
responsiveness to the cultural backgrounds and differing perspectives students bring to the learning
95
1.00
environment.
Evidence
This lesson, on handwriting, used hands-on materials such as whiteboards, manipulatives, AND technology.
Katie Cox 20446379


evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Standard 4: Content Knowledge Score No Evidence

4.1
Teacher candidates stimulate student reflection on prior content knowledge, link new concepts to familiar 96 1.00
concepts, and make connections to students’ experiences.
4.2
Teacher candidates use supplementary resources and technologies effectively to ensure accessibility and 96 1.00
relevance for all students.
4.3
Teacher candidates create opportunities for students to learn, practice, and master academic language in their 97 1.00
content area.
Evidence
Before giving answers to the class about letter formation, Katie allowed time for individual brainstorming before teaching new content, this may be
done by posing a question related to previous learning or experiences and giving ample
think time or creating a web
Katie Cox 20446379


evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Standard 5: Application of Content Score No Evidence

5.1
Teacher candidates engage students in applying content knowledge to real-world problems through the lens of 95 1.00
interdisciplinary themes (e.g., financial literacy, environmental literacy).
5.2
Teacher candidates facilitate students’ ability to develop diverse social and cultural perspectives that expand 94 1.00
their understanding of local and global issues and create novel approaches to solving problems.
Evidence
When completing this lesson, Katie allowed for plenty of time for students to share opinions on letter formations.
Katie Cox 20446379


evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Standard 6: Assessment Score No Evidence

6.1
1.00
Teacher candidates design assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and minimize 94
sources of bias that can distort assessment results.
6.2
Teacher candidates work independently and collaboratively to examine test and other performance data to 95 1.00
understand each student’s progress and to guide planning.
6.3
Teacher candidates prepare all students for the demands of particular assessment formats and make
appropriate modifications in assessments or testing conditions especially for students with disabilities and 94 1
language learning needs.
Evidence
Upon completion of the lesson, Katie analyzes the results of the word formation to identify patterns within the whole class, groups, and individuals.
Katie Cox 20446379


evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Standard 7: Planning for Instruction Score No Evidence

7.1
Teacher candidates plan how to achieve each student’s learning goals, choosing appropriate strategies and 95 1.00
accommodations, resources, and materials to differentiate instruction for individuals and groups of students.
7.2
Teacher candidates develop appropriate sequencing of learning experiences and provide multiple ways to 98 1.00
demonstrate knowledge and skill.
7.3
Teacher candidates plan for instruction based on formative and summative assessment data, prior student 97 1.00
knowledge, and student interest.
Evidence
Katie designs lessons that build upon and practice previous learning, leading to students mastering skills and concepts. This lesson on the Magic "C" built on the prior day's
and week's lesson.
Katie Cox 20446379


evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Standard 8: Instructional Strategies Score No Evidence

8.1
Teacher candidates vary their role in the instructional process (e.g., instructor, facilitator, coach, audience) in 96 1.00
relation to the content, purpose of instruction, and student needs
8.2
Teacher candidates engage students in using a range of learning skills and technology tools to access, interpret, 97 1.00
evaluate, and apply information.
8.3
Teacher candidates ask questions to stimulate discussion that serve different purposes (e.g., probing for
student understanding, helping students articulate their ideas and thinking processes, stimulating curiosity,
95
1.00
and helping students to question).
Evidence
During the instruction in the front of the class, Katie Facilitated and guided the students to meet the lesson objections during group/independent work
Katie Cox 20446379


evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Standard 9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Score No Evidence

9.1
Independently and in collaboration with colleagues, teacher candidates use a variety of data (e.g., systematic 1.00
observation, information about students, and research) to evaluate the outcomes of teaching and learning and 94
to adapt planning and practice.
9.2
Teacher candidates actively seek professional, community, and technological resources, within and outside the 93 1.00
school, as supports for analysis, reflection, and problem solving.
Evidence
Through Lexia data at the start of each class, Katie Analyzes benchmark assessment data individually and with grade level teams to evaluate the outcomes of learning and
plan future instruction
Katie Cox 20446379


evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Standard 10: Leadership and Collaboration Score No Evidence

10.1
Teacher candidates use technological tools and a variety of communication strategies to build local and global 95 1.00
learning communities that engage students, families, and colleagues.
10.2
Teacher candidates advocate to meet the needs of students, to strengthen the learning environment, and to 94 1.00
enact system change.
Evidence
Katie definitely understands the needs of each student in the class and acts as an advocate when needed to make sure these needs are met
Katie Cox 20446379

Grand Canyon University: Impact on Student Learning

evaluations)
teaching. teaching.
Grand Canyon University: Impact on Student Learning Score No Evidence

Teacher candidates demonstrate an understanding of their impact on student learning as evidenced in the
Student Teaching Evaluation of Performance (STEP) and other formative and summative assessments. 96 1.00
Evidence
Katie does a good job at analyzing student progress and relates/plans how fast the pace should be going based on that data.
Katie Cox 20446379

INSTRUCTIONS
Please review the "Total Scored Percentage" for accuracy and add any attachments before completing the "Agreement and Signature" section.
Total Scored Percentage:

95.04 %
ATTACHMENTS
Clinical Practice Time Log:
(Required)
Attachment 1:
(Optional)
Attachment 2:
(Optional)
AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE

This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback from the Cooperating / Mentor Teacher. The GCU Faculty Supervisor and
Cooperating /Mentor Teacher should collaboratively review the performance in each category prior to the evaluation meeting.
I attest this submission is accurate, true, and in compliance with GCU policy guidelines, to the best of my ability to do so.
GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Date

Dr. Richard L. Whitehead
Dr. Richard L. Whitehead (Oct 4, 2019) Oct 4, 2019
Clinical Practice Time L
STUDENT NAME ( Last, First, Middle): STUDENTID: PROGRAM OF STUDY:
Ct;'t , ke:" \-1 (. ) L"\r\n c9D~L~W-3Iq I?D~LheJO, 01=' S(iU\c'L i'n \::.
~~Lrvuh~~
l(('J.)O)
PLACEMENT INFORMATION
DISTRICT, SCHOOL, CLASSROOM(S):
Q,Ve.X- 'c. \-crY! en\or ~ ~O\
~yw\;tJ(\l ()'ni(j
KEY Present use: X= student contact or teacher contract day. Absent use: lW=inclementweather, DH=district holiday, lL = a = Other
illness,
WEEK Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Dates '? I,.lr/lq C:/;;l/ \C\ C( /9 /Je'j qllltltlq f-1/~)jl'i "I130/IQ
-
J'i 30/A
-
t/\p!n C1IIS/lq Q/20IIQ
- -
t/111 r1 ION/!'
Monday
X \)\-\ 'X 0 Y X
Tuesday
X X -: 'A j "A
Wednesday
X X 't 'i i i-.
Thursday
~
.~ x. 0 "" X
Friday
Days to be
'~
.~
I<. < 't
made-up due
to absences
D \ C) 2 D"
J"
Cooperating
Teacher's
Initials ~ ~
~il-ff'
·V ~ \ !
I hereby certify that the above mentioned GCU Teacher Candidate bas completed the required weeks of Clinical Practice (Student Teaching):
Cooperating Teacher Name: Signature: Date: _
L.,f.,D:L ~D ~
JciJ ~llq
Teacher Candidate Name: ~"'~ Signature: Date:_--.-_r-- __
GCU Faculty Supervisor Name iC~(.I.rdWt ,iIMJ Signature: llfOJ tv~ Date:
Tile data entered into tile Clinical Practice Time/Activity Log may be audited/or accuracy by a College 0/ Education Representative.
Falsifying information is aform 0/ Academic Dishonesty and is ill direct violation o/GCU's Code of Conduct Policy.
tf'),,")Ol (1 ~....", •..•rI ~""",-,._ T T•.•;"ot"~;"", "11 D;,.....ht~ DOo("'l,o·.·"o....1

Katie Cox Clinical Practice Evaluation 2 - Single Placement

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Katie Cox Clinical Practice Evaluation 2 - Single Placement

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

CLINICAL PRACTICE EVALUATION 2S

Katie Cox 20446379

Bachelor of Science in Elementary Education

ELM-490 8/26/2019 12/8/2019

FOR COURSE INSTRUCTORS ONLY:

Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 1: Student Development Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 2: Learning Differences Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 3: Learning Environments Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 4: Content Knowledge Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 5: Application of Content Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 6: Assessment Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 7: Planning for Instruction Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 8: Instructional Strategies Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Scoring Guide

Standard 10: Leadership and Collaboration Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Grand Canyon University: Impact on Student Learning

Grand Canyon University: Impact on Student Learning Score No Evidence

Katie Cox 20446379

Total Scored Percentage:

AGREEMENT AND SIGNATURE

GCU Faculty Supervisor E-Signature Date

Cooperating Teacher Name: Signature: Date: _

tf'),,")Ol (1 ~....", •..•rI ~""",-,._ T T•.•;"ot"~;"", "11 D;,.....ht~ DOo("'l,o·.·"o....1

S-ar putea să vă placă și