Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 2 of 6
restructure and refocus any responses that stray
too far from the targeted structures or who’s
answers did not properly meet the goal. I then
hope to finish with a brief exit ticket that will
give me one last opportunity to see how much
my students actually picked up from the activity.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 3 of 6
I had more student engagement in
Teacher provided opportunity for
this lesson than I usually do on any
students to use inquiry to expand Students were answering the
other particular day; however, there
Specific Feedback the engagement of all students. The questions, utilizing vocabulary in
What information can you
was some distractions with the types
teacher provided a great structure the target language, and were
provide the NT regarding of questions I used on the Pear Deck.
requested special (Pear Deck Slides presentation) from almost all engaged and participating
feedback? I think this may be inevitable for
which students became engaged in the activity.
some students but I may want to
the lesson.
structure it more next time to get
less off-task behavior.
Teacher utilized pictures of different
areas of Puerto Rico to build
Students were engaged in the
engagement with the topic asking Although I was monitoring what the
presentation and the interactive
CSTP 1: Engaging All students to explain what they students were doing on the Pear
Students activity(Pear deck) assignment.
recognized in the pictures, where Deck, I was not frequently leaning
In what ways were students Students were asking questions,
engaged? How were they thought the place were, and over students’ shoulders to make
students not engaged? making guess during the
How did students contribute
anything they could share about sure they were participating on the
presentation, and seeking
to their learning? them in the target language. slide. Since Pear Deck does not have
How did teacher and/or clarification. Students were almost
Teacher then showed them on a names, I should make sure that I am
students monitor learning? completely engaged with the
How were the focus map where it is and important also circulating the class more and
students engaged and exception of one student who
supported throughout the factoids for them to get drawn into monitoring what the students are
wasn’t following the presentation
lesson? the content and the incoming lesson doing on their laptops so I know they
on her device.
topic. Teacher also responded to are engaged in the lesson.
student’s questions about the map.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 4 of 6
My Pear Deck gave me insight into
CSTP 5: Assessing Student
Learning
how well students understood what I
How did students Teacher utilized checks for was asking. It also gave me insight
demonstrate achievement
Students responded to questions
understanding during the lesson to into how well they new to utilize the
of lesson objectives? about the lesson and stayed in the
In what ways did students evaluate progress of student target language to deliver their
struggle or demonstrate target language.
limited understanding? learning. message. My worksheet activity for
What teacher actions them though felt a bit too involved
contributed to student
achievement? and may need to be scaled back next
time.
Section 4: Post Observation Conference
We agreed that I achieved my lesson objectives for my lecture portion and could scale back the assignment on
To what degree did students the reading and written portion. The amount of work I was trying to pack into the lesson may have been
achieve lesson objectives? enough for almost two lessons. I came to learn (or reinforced) how important it is to limit the quantity of work
to a certain degree so I can see more quality from my students.
Focus Student 1: English Learner Focus Student 2: Student w/ILP/504 Focus Student 3: Your Choice
I ended up having students work in I did not use a protocol for this
This student was actually one of the
pairs as I thought it would be less activity but I did notice that this
students who participated that
To what degree did focus disruptive and allow for more student worked well with her
does not normally participate. I
students achieve lesson accountability to the work. I partner. I think the lead up into
objectives? think that in itself is a win and I may
noticed that this student the partner work gave students
choose to do lessons similar to this
immediately began to work with confidence to tackle the work that
more often so others may step out
his partner and was annotating the was found on the graphic
of their comfort zones.
reading as he should be. organizer.
I want to change how I launch this activity. Many of my students use the school devices that take a substantial
amount of time to launch. I think next time I will have a message projected on my board that has them
What would you do differently
next time? immediately pull out their devices and get them going. I did not do that this time around because I wanted to
do a few other things before we jumped into the lesson; however, this lesson has given me insight into how
involved it can be so I want to avoid all the beginning stuff first next time.
1. Student Engagement – Almost all (if not all) of my students were using the Pear Deck and were engaged with
the questions I embedded. Even students who do not normally participate were engaged in the process.
2. Comprehensible – I would say most of my students (if not all) were able to follow along through almost the
What were three top Lesson entire process. Even when my students struggled, they found ways to communicate their difficulties and I was
Strengths? able to help them navigate those frustrations.
3. Accessible – I provided various forms of participation that allowed for all kinds of learners to engage in the
lesson. There was technology, word banks, a graphic organizer, and more which allowed for any given portion
of the lesson to be accessible to my students.
1. Teacher Talk – There was moments where my line of questioning could have been better. I need to practice
my circling techniques to get my students to hear the target language even more, and so that they are
internalizing the different ways it can be used in context.
2. Graphic Organizer Length – All the structure of the graphic organizer was solid, the length was a bit too long.
What were three top areas for
improvement? I required students to annotate too much and then required them to conjugate too many verbs. There should
have been focus verbs I had them look so I can have them work on what I cared about most.
3. Transition into Graphic Organizer portion of lesson was not fluid. It actually required me to explain the
instructions to my students multiple times. I think I need to practice at home how I can verbalize and project
instructions on my slides so it is easier for my students to follow.
I want to do a similar lesson using a different article and country in the future. Seeing this lesson allows me to
do an improved version next time and really focus in on which language structures I would like kids to practice
What are next steps?
during that lesson. I will also be grading their graphic organizer soon so I know to what degree my students
understood the material.
Other Comments/Notes
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 5 of 6
Although preparing lessons with this much level of intentionality is not new to me, this POP Cycle really gave me insight into which kids I
was slowly beginning to forget about. As the school year as progressed, the fatigue had me going through the motions and making sure I
was focusing on the lesson more, and the students less.
All parts of this form should be transcribed (typed; not hand-written) into a single document and submitted to course instructor.
Information from this POP Cycle should be summarized on the NT ILP as appropriate.
POP Cycle, Fullerton Online Teacher Induction Program (FOTIP), 2017. Adapted from CSU Fullerton Titan EDUCATOR Project, 2017. Page 6 of 6