Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
FOOD INSECURITY
Table of Contents
PROGRAM EVALUATION: HUNGER..HURTS! FOOD INSECURITY AMONG
Executive Summary 3
Mission Statement 4
SMART Goals and Objectives 4
Program Design and Implementation 5
Program Evaluation 7
Recommendations 8
Reflection 9
References 11
Appendix A 13
Appendix B 15
Appendix C 20
PROGRAM EVALUATION: HUNGER..HURTS! FOOD INSECURITY AMONG
Executive Summary
The program evaluated pertains to raising awareness and providing resources of food
insecurity, and its mission to reduce hunger and increase food security among college students.
“Knowledge is food for the mind, without food for the body, learning is impossible” is a quote
mentioned in the PSA that perfectly introduces food insecurity among college students because it
provides a concrete example of how this issue can affect student’s ability to learn, focus, and
overall health. This PSA addresses the target audience based on the high prevalence of food
insecurity among all college students, including CSUSB students, and the rationale behind this
program. Tying in the contributing factors that correlates with food insecurity, such as the high
increase in college tuition fees, and personal living expenses brings a good understanding as to
why food insecurity among college students is a major public health concern.
A formative evaluation was used to critique this program and identify positive and
constructive feedback. The use of visually appealing graphics, current food insecurity statistics,
and Spanish subtitles to cater to the diversity of CSUSB, are all positive attributes that would
make the program successful. However, several tips were recommended to enhance the program
even further. The use of voice overs, extending the length of time to each slide, and a general
outline of typical students’ food environment, will make the PSA more effective while delivering
a stronger message to understand the severity of food insecurity among CSUSB students.
Strong communication and highlighting each other's strengths was key in producing a
successful and timely project. In-person meetings and the use of emails helped with proper
preparation and meeting personal deadlines. The use of background research and creatively
applying what was learned in class, brought the outcome of a successful program evaluation.
Mission Statement
The mission statement was well defined in the public service announcement (PSA) for
food insecurity among college students. The mission is to reduce hunger and food insecurity for
the students of CSUSB. The PSA also disclosed factors that could be contributing to hunger and
food insecurity, such as the increase in college tuition and expenses. The lack of adequate
nutrition makes learning impossible, which impacts student academics, and even their futures
after college. By increasing the overall health and well being of CSUSB students, this will
improve the opportunity for academic success. Throughout the PSA, it was clear that this is a
public health concern among college students and more awareness is needed to combat this issue
The goals of the PSA for food insecurity among college students, is to bring awareness to
the issue of food insecurity and providing the target population resources, such as the Obersaw
Delivering Emergency Nourishment (DEN), that can be found on campus. By educating students
on the issue of food insecurity, and increasing their knowledge regarding on-campus resources,
this will empower students to increase self-efficacy to reach out and seek assistance when in
need. Objectives were not included in the PSA, but after speaking with the program/PSA creators
1. By summer 2021, the overall awareness of food insecurity and resources available to
2. By summer 2021, reduce food insecurity rates among CSUSB students from the baseline
of 36.6% to 20%.
PROGRAM EVALUATION: HUNGER..HURTS! FOOD INSECURITY AMONG
well as how they will be implemented to achieve their goals. The information presented was easy
to follow and comprehend, the vocabulary used can be understood at a 5th grade reading level,
and this PSA overall would be a great tool in achieving their program goals and objectives.
Target Population
The intended target population is college students at CSUSB. When the cost of education
and cost of living continue to rise, college students are finding themselves on an extremely tight
budget and an unfortunate reality facing food insecurity. According to the Urban Institute (2017),
there is an association between college students who face food insecurity and poorer overall
wellness compared to their food secure peers. This poorer overall wellness include health,
academic performance, and mental health symptoms, such as depression and anxiety. The Urban
Institute also claims that food insecurity among college students range from 14% to 72%.
According to the presentation on Supporting Student Success through the Basic Needs Initiative,
36.6% of CSUSB students reported being food insure and 17.9% are facing very low food
security (2016). Additionally, food insecurity was more prevalent among Black/African
American and first generation college students (65.9%) (CSU, 2018). Wondering about the next
nutritious meal is a constant thought for food insecure students throughout their time in college,
but even more so at the end of the academic quarter or semester, or during holidays and breaks,
like spring and summer. During these times are when students, especially undocumented,
commuter and international students, are more likely to experience food insecurity (Watson, T.,
College students identify the primary determinant of their food insecurity due to the
rising cost of education, high rents, and inadequate financial aid to meet basic needs. Seventy-
two percent of college students work while attending college—with 20% of them working full-
time—but 41% rely on financial aid to cover expenses and basic needs. At CSUSB, 62% of
undergraduate students are low-income and are Pell Grant recipients (CSUSB, 2017). Despite
reliance on jobs and financial aid, this income is typically insufficient to support themselves
(Dubick, J., Matthews, B., Cady, C., 2016). Moreover, expenses tend to get prioritized by tuition
and fees, books and supplies, then housing, and often food is left as the last of priorities (Watson,
Food insecurity is an issue that is not only unique to CSUSB campus but is an issue that
students reported being food insure and 17.9% are facing very low food security (2016). These
numbers are shockingly high and a program is needed to improve food security on CSUSB’s
campus. Best practices that have been identified on other college campuses can be used as a
framework to help CSUSB combat this issue. A recent article, How Two Colleges Are Fighting
Food Insecurity on Campus, expressed the importance of a food pantry on college campuses as
one of the key means to tackle this problem (2018). Implementing the Hunger..Hurts! program
would help raise awareness of the food pantry resource on campus, the Obershaw DEN. The
Obershaw DEN is not just a place to where students receive food items but serves as a resource
center to help match and assist those facing hardships with external resources that would benefit
the student in need. Such resources include CalFresh, a nutrition assistance program for low-
PROGRAM EVALUATION: HUNGER..HURTS! FOOD INSECURITY AMONG
income individuals (State of California, n.d.). Displaying the Hunger..Hurts! video across
campus will help raise awareness of this issue and of available resources, like the Obershaw
DEN. As a result, a positive shift in the food insecurity numbers at CSUSB would be expected as
Program Evaluation
The type of evaluation used to critique Hunger.. Hurts! food insecurity among college
students PSA was a formative evaluation. The program has barely been developed and has not
yet been implemented, so it is vital to conduct a formative evaluation in order to present the
group with feedback prior to implementing the program. The evaluation was done to analyze the
possible effectiveness, and how it would be perceived among the target population. Since the
program has not yet been implemented, there is no outcome, so a summative evaluation cannot
be completed. The use of formative evaluation can enhance program components before and
during implementation. In this case, the evaluation was done so the PSA could be modified, to
better serve the campus community. Based on the feedback provided, the group should be able to
make changes to their PSA and bring better results when showcased to students on campus.
This PSA was created in order to have a greater impact. Impact evaluation measures long
term changes in behavioral impact or changes in attitudes, knowledge, and awareness. Since the
program has not yet been implemented, we cannot see the impact the PSA has within the campus
community. The development of this PSA was to bring awareness to students, but also
professors, and campus administration about the importance of increasing food security. By
raising the knowledge about the impact that food insecurity has on student’s well being,
administrators will become more involved in creating change. Thus, the development of more
programs can help students in increasing the percentage of food security on campus.
PROGRAM EVALUATION: HUNGER..HURTS! FOOD INSECURITY AMONG
The group is still in the development process of their program and hope to implement by
June 2020. They hope that by this time they are able to have a more solid video that will be
helpful and significant for the campus community and therefore should be able to see the results
by the following year. The group hopes that by June 2021 a summative and impact evaluation
Recommendations
Food insecurity among college students is at a very high percentage and this group puts
an emphasis on the importance of reducing food insecurity among CSUSB’s campus. After
evaluating the PSA, the following positive and constructive feedback will help improve the
program (see Appendix B for individual evaluation reports). One positive feedback, was the
imagery and background throughout the video was well fitted. For example, in the beginning of
the PSA, a student walking through a campus and another reading their book, visually
demonstrated that the target population was college students, and was very well interpreted. The
group also did a great job at keeping the imagery and background consistent with the topic
A second positive aspect was the viewpoints and statistics provided in regards to food
insecurity among college students. The PSA expressed the desire that college students want to
learn and are hungry for knowledge but are unable to learn effectively as a result of the side
effects of the hunger that they face. Mentioning student loan debt issues, and how college used to
be more affordable for students, brought concrete points that indicates these are huge
contributing factors to the high percentage of college students facing food insecurity. Providing
actual statistics within the PSA was a great tactic to understand the severity of food insecurity on
The last positive quality from this PSA was the Spanish subtitles provided. Due to the
racial diversity on campus, this was great way to incorporate a broader reach of audiences. The
addition of subtitles set a great example of bringing different cultures into learning and
understanding the issue CSUSB faces. The subtitles are displayed for the convenience of
individuals who feel more comfortable reading in Spanish. The PSA did an excellent job of
The PSA would be more effective if a voiceover was included. Doing so would aid in
keeping the audience more engaged, by eliminating the need of having to read the slides. This
will allow the audience to hear the information being presented, fully grasping the content and
The second constructive feedback, includes improving the length of time of each slide.
With no voiceover and the length of the text per slide, the time allotted was too fast to fully read
and understand the content. The video source, Powtoon, allows up to three minutes of film use
for the free version. Adding extra time to the slides and to allow more time to read and
understand the content, will make the message of the PSA more powerful. Overall, a voice over
Lastly, understanding why college students are food insecure was lacking may be be
good to express as well. For instance, looking into what kind of food is surrounded by the
college? Is it a food desert? Additionally, the PSA can benefit by providing more information on
the Obershaw DEN resource, and what they provide for CSUSB students, would be helpful for
Reflection
PROGRAM EVALUATION: HUNGER..HURTS! FOOD INSECURITY AMONG
One of the biggest lessons learned while completing this evaluation was the importance
of strong and clear communication. We needed to be clear on dividing up the work so that
everyone had an equal contribution to the evaluation and had the ability to highlight their
qualities appropriately. We found the best way to communicate was after class when all
members were present, email and by creating a google doc that would show everyone's collective
work at a current time (see Appendix A for group meeting minutes). We made sure to set a
personal deadline for us to have these pieces done so that we had sufficient time to edit and blend
Some of the new skills that we learned were how to take a visual product that was created
from another group and creatively evaluate it as if it were a real program that was implemented
on our college campus. In order to do this we really had to have a clear understanding of
program evaluations and put in the work to research the topic for a better understanding in order
to fully evaluate the product. This evaluation was a good learning method for us, as some
members within our group may be hired as an external consultant to do a program evaluation.
From evaluating the PSA, we were able to apply our knowledge from HSCI 613 and
identify the Social Cognitive Theory embedded in the PSA. Hunger..Hurts! looks at the
individual level of knowledge and educates those who watch it about campus resources and the
campus issue of food insecurity. The PSA feeds viewers confidence in their ability to use the
available resources by educating them on the location of the Obershaw DEN and how easy it is
to access.
PROGRAM EVALUATION: HUNGER..HURTS! FOOD INSECURITY AMONG
References
California State University, San Bernardino (CSUSB). (2016). Supporting Student Success
https://www.csusb.edu/graduation-initiative-2025/events/gi-2025-conference/gi-2025-
program
California State University, San Bernardino (CSUSB). (2017). Facts and Stats. Retrieved from
https://www.csusb.edu/about-csusb/facts-and-stats
Dubick, J., Matthews, B., and Cady, C. (2016). Hunger on Campus. The Challenge of Food
content/uploads/2016/10/Hunger_On_Campus.pdf
Presence. (2017). How Two Colleges Are Fighting Food Insecurity on Campus. Retrieved from
http://www.presence.io/blog/how-two-colleges-are-fighting-food-insecurity-on-campus/
nutrition/calfresh
The California State University (CSU). (2018). Study of Student Basic Needs. Retrieved from
https://www2.calstate.edu/impact-of-the-csu/student-success/basic-needs-
initiative/Documents/phaseII-report-with-Appendix.pdf
https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/92331/assessing_food_insecurity_on
_campus_3.pdf
Watson, T., Malan, H., Glik, D. (2017). College students identify university support for basic
needs and life skills as key ingredient as addressing food insecurity on campus.
PROGRAM EVALUATION: HUNGER..HURTS! FOOD INSECURITY AMONG
from http://calag.ucanr.edu/Archive/?article=ca.2017a0023
PROGRAM EVALUATION: HUNGER..HURTS! FOOD INSECURITY AMONG
Appendix A
Location: PS 326
Date: February 28, 2019
Time: 10-10:30pm
Attendees: Allison, Andrea, Nickole, Rae Chelle; Not present: Jeanette
Agenda
● Project division – Andrea will send out an email with the project guidelines
● Nickole will start a google doc to invite everyone to choose parts based on their strengths.
● Everyone will get started on their parts in the coming week
● In 2 weeks, we will discuss progress, questions concerns, and personal deadlines
Location: PS 326
Date: March 14, 2019
Time: 8-8:30pm
Attendees: Allison, Andrea, Jeanette, Nickole, Rae Chelle
Agenda
● Check-in on progress/status of the project – everyone is doing well, very few concerns
and questions
● Meet with Food Insecurity group to ask questions about the PSA (goals, objectives,
program implementation)
● Personal deadline: by Monday, March 18th, everyone will have their parts done and into
the google doc
● By Wednesday, March 20th, edits and revisions will be done
● Submit by Thursday, March 21st
PROGRAM EVALUATION: HUNGER..HURTS! FOOD INSECURITY AMONG
Appendix B
Appendix C
http://www.powtoon.com/embed/fTve8Uw1AU1/