Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract:
Asia countries. All of EFL programs need to be carried out through government policies, but
as “earlier is better” philosophy always be rooted in parents typical mind, which causes
every student has different language level. Therefore schools will face a controversial issue,
which when students have their English classes; the school should divide them into language
groups in order to give them so called better English education or should keep them as
regular classes. As a consequence, problems and controversies have been arisen related to
inconsistencies that exist between English ability grouping and normal class grouping. The
purpose for this study is to explore these implementation issues and problems from
should be considered as an issue. This study concludes with some implications for the
possible reforms of primary EFL education teaching that aim to improve implementation in
Introduction:
Taiwan government policies supporting teaching primary school English are often
framed in terms of globalization and the need to compete with other Asian neighbors in order
to have its international competitiveness. Evidence for this can be found in the international
has increased international interactions and demonstrates to the whole nation how important
English is. English proficiency is the key to access the world and it will ensure them to access
macro-level.
help Taiwan step into the world. In order to accelerate Taiwan to achieve this aim, English
directly has fostered with different structures in English proficiency to prepare their kids for
higher social and economic status in the future. Therefore English learning has been regarded
as a “whole nation movement”. “English fever”(Krashen, 2003) has spread throughout the
entire country. Taiwan Government is forced to give students best English education school
environment in Primary school grade 3 in 2005 (Lan, C. Chern, 2010) correspond to satisfy
As mentioned earlier, parent’s highest expectation gives Taiwan government a great pressure to
make language policy (Fang, Y. Chang, 2018) to be implemented in primary school students.
Another heavy pressure comes from a concept of Taiwan must be globalizing education
standards by means of giving students best English learning as first step. English ability
grouping should be adapted in teaching or not is full of controversial issue (Yu, H. Lin, 2010)
analyzed.
Developing Taiwan into a Bilingual Nation by 2030”. In complete accord with this goal,
the Ministry of Education (MOE) has set five policies (Ministry of Education, 2018). The
first policy is to ask teachers to adopt a dynamic teaching approach with focus on daily
English use. Apparently, how to enhance students’ English competencies for both listening
and speaking will be the priority for primary school students. Mixed up language level
students in one class that emerged after the official implementation of English instruction
in the primary schools are not unfamiliar to many. Though class size has been reduced to
around 30 students per class due to lower birthrate, it is still difficult for teachers to design
lessons to cater to students with different proficiency levels and readiness to learn English.
English ability grouping or not that has arisen with the implementation of the new
curriculum is the issue come from the bottom-up pressure of the parent’s
ability grouping causes the issue of supply and demand for English teachers.Jing, Y. Jan
pointed out that Taipei and New Taipei city, total 159 English teachers; but only 41
teachers (26.4%) have English teacher license (Jing, Y. Jan, 2004). Recruiting one-third
more teachers were needed when English instruction was implemented to English ability
grouping curriculum. How to get more qualified teachers or give unqualified teachers
training and salary expenditure, all of these will cause government finance become very
difficult.
“Don’t lose at the start point” is very traditional mindset in Taiwan society. “Critical
period” in language learning most effectively is another rooted mindset (Eric, H,
5
ANOVERVIEW ON PUBLIC PRIMARY ENGLISH EDUCATION IN TAIWAN
Lenneberg,1967).In term of these two reasons, parents enroll their children in English
bilingual school or English cram school were the practical advantages of speaking English,
student’s English proficiency individually. In view of the large gap in students’ proficiency
levels among students in the same class,; they strong to stand their point that to implement
English ability grouping in primary school English teaching. Teaching English by mean of
factor; which gives lower level students so called “labeling effects” (Howard, S. Becker,
1963). English ability grouping is one of methods, but perhaps it is not only solution to
Learning language must be fun and engaging if we are going to learn a language it,
so how to keep student’s English learning interesting and motivation is a top priority. A
survey stated(Chu, H, Qin, 2012), using normal class grouping teaching English in Taipei
city for 112 primary schools. 61.2% students shown they were very happy to stay with
their original classmates and only 10.3% shown unhappy. 58% students felt English class
made their English proficiency better, but 10.9 clamed negative. 54.5% like to learn with
their classmates, 17.1% do not like it. From this survey, most students do not feel the need
to implement English ability grouping teaching. As we know, there are two types of
motivation are very important for helping students to learn a language, intrinsic and
extrinsic. Once students like this learning environment or they feel the classroom is
interesting, it will stimulate their intrinsic motivation and keep learning a language.
Take Taipei city as an instance, total 142 primary schools. 30 schools using English
ability grouping and 112 schools using normal class grouping(Chu, H, Qin, 2012). For
78.9% schools, differences in student’s English proficiency in every class has been created
teaching problems as mentioned. According to Dale the Cone of Experience concept,
6
ANOVERVIEW ON PUBLIC PRIMARY ENGLISH EDUCATION IN TAIWAN
According to one of the principles in the selection and use of teaching strategies, the more
senses that are involved in learning, the more and the better the learning will be. According
to the cone, a student will only retain, on average, 5% via lecture but will retain 90% of
what they teach others (Dale, 1946). That sounds to give an opportunity of normal class
while also acquiring different language level students for working in a team. Teachers
to guild high language level students to have active attitude to teach lowers.
Each class selects listening, speaking, reading and writing assistance teachers, who
are willing to help classmates to discuss or solve English problems during self-study or
after-school activities. Schools also can provide opportunities for students to have school
competitions such as drama, presentation, lecture …etc. All purposes of these are trying to
For using social resources effectively, invite college students whose English is
good to help students who need to be helped in learning English. Remedial teaching
Conclusion
development. It should be aimed at student’s learning ability and needs, and cultivate
their interest in learning English and good learning attitude (Selcuk Koran, 2015).
adopt multiple teaching and evaluation. Parents should cooperate with teachers to
encourage children to learn. Three of them should work together to stimulate students'
interest in learning and develop their communication skills in listening, speaking, reading
7
ANOVERVIEW ON PUBLIC PRIMARY ENGLISH EDUCATION IN TAIWAN
and writing in daily life. Help them to read English books in order to cultivate their
culture and expanding their worldview and outlook on life. How to make our students like
to learn English and learn to succeed is not only the responsibility of English teachers, but
References
[1] Krashen, S. (2003). Dealing with English fever.In J. E. Katchen (Ed.), Selected
Papers from the Twelfth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 10-108).
Taipei: Crane.
[2] Lan, C. Chern (2010).An overview of English Language Education at primary level
in Taiwan. Retrieved from National Taiwan Normal Universality, Department of
English website:
http://www.gavo.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/L2WS2010/papers/L2WS2010_S-03.pdf
[3] Fang, Y, Chang (2008).Parents’ attitude toward the English Education Policy in
Taiwan. Retrieved from National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan website:
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ835211.pdf