- The main ideas in the strategies, the scope of the scheme, the goals related to subsidize UCT - Main obj – modal shift from roads to UCT - Sec obj – a better protection of the environment, better protiection of the towns, historical monuments, redicution of the noise , reduction of emissions of co2 and other gases, a decrease in the number of accidents on public roads, decrease of the external costs - Indicate the legal basis for the programme - Copy what’s written in programme justification, maybe less developed style - Strategiile din domeniul transportului 2. Funding conditions - Indicate the aid intensity, the budget and the um which will be granted for every container 3. Eligibility criteria and selection criteria - Copy from general criteria from document related to marco polo, and adapt this rules for our programme - Could be general criteria; - We will finance only transport services and not purchasing of different equipment or vehicles - Nationality of the applicant/beneficiary – indicate that any company registered in EU which is a railway operator could be beneficiary in the programme - NU COPIEM E4 - E5 copied as in the document – marco polo - E6 is related to the period in which subsidies could be given to any legal person compliant with the eligibility criteria - Specific criteria: o Applicant must be a railway operator o Applicant must not be in an undertaking or financial difficulties o Applicant must not have debts to the state budget or to the local budget o Applicant must not have debts to the environment fund o Applicant must not be bankrupted, in insolvency or in similar situations o Applicant must not be subject to a decision to recover an illegal state aid o Applicant must prove that it has the resources to implement the project o Applicant must have all expertise in order to implement the project, knowledge, experience and expertise o Applicant must have a good financial status and financial resources to support the implementation of the project - Ro la applicants guideline in Romania: applicant must have at least 3 years of economical activity - Undertaking – communication from the commission – point 20 – definition (page 6/28) – sunt tabele – se calculaeaza acei parametri – tabel firma in dificulate economica – poc.research.gov.ro – translate the table for selection criteria - Take table from pg 14/20 – give points to the different parameters - trebuie adaptat – luati parametrii definiti in tabelul referitor la undertaking. - Regarding the technical capacity – the expertise the applicant has – copy sentences from s.2. technical capacity of applicants 4. Award criteria - Take from marco polo document - Study award criteria in award procedure in the case of ro la transport in Romania (word doc) – article 8 – pct 3, 4, 5 - Choose from the 2 systems – marco polo vs ro la Romania - Credibility of the action – we can give points - ask for fesability studies proving that the project is viable - copiat din marco polo - Avoid innovative app, dissemination plan, European added value 5. How to prepare a proposal - Indicate documents that need to be submitted to the ministry of transport - Ne inspiram din documentele de la ro la Romania – articolul 23 selectia solicitantului - Ne mai putem uita si la ce s-a cerut la marco polo – appendix 2 6. How to submit the proposal - Rules both in marco polo and in guidelines of ro la in Romania - You have to submit documents both on paper and cd/dvd in a pack and envelope submitted to a specific address and having indicated the name of the programme (not the name of the project) - Documentele se transmit in perioada indicata in documentele sesiunii de proiecte – data viitoare!! - Provide very clear rules: o Decide between 2 options: Allow appl to submitted whenever they want: indicste that appl are allowd to submit proposals at every moment during the year, it is possilbe to finish the funds while applicants are still submitting proposals Allow appl to submit only in specific periods, ehich are specified in periodical calls: work in sessions specified in calls, budget is very clear, specifiy criteria for choosing the winner Articol 7 din ghid finantare ro la The form in which the docs must be submitted: the appl must put in an envelope a lot of docs and cd/dvd. Indicate the programme and session for admission. Deadline for submission Rules for style of different forms All pages must be numbered, etc - mai multe in art7 A document submitted outside of the session period means the document is rejected Full call text 013 pdf Contents of the envelope: article 23 in ro la: what is asked from the railway operators in order to accept a proposal o Form that request the subsidies; such forms are anexes to the guidelines,we have to create such a form - model is annex 1 in ro la document. Such a form must be an annex to our guideline. o Firma in dificultste=an undertaking of financial difficulty o Putem indica toate documentele, sa ne uitam si in marco polo - business case o Evaluation/assesment of the proposals: Financial authority must establish an evaluation comission having 3-5 members, one of them being the president of the comission The members could be employees of the authority or independent evaluators This comitee must prepare a report regarding every proposal indicating: The proposal is to be rejected or admitted, and reasons if they rejected the proposal For accepted proposals they must have sections regarding the eligibility of the benficiary, regarding the credibility of the probosals, regarding how the competition is distorted by the subsidy Criteria for establishing an order - articol 8: a progamme coeficient was defined OR we can grant points for different aspects like in marco polo programme (full call text 2013 pdf) PRACTIC AWARD CRITERIA DE PUS DUPA AWARD CRITERIA After the accepted proposals are announced, the rejected applicants must be allowed to appeal. We have to describe the appeal procedure - articolul 12 din ro la . The results of the appeal must be published in order to ensure the transparency of the programme (also the reason must be mentioned clearly) 7. Financing contract ● Every contract must be signed only after the evaluation and after all the appeals are resolved ● Article 13 ro la ● Subsidies are possible only after the conclusion of a specific contract and the text of the contract is indicated in another annex. ● Procedure for negotiation and signing the contract - cannot be negociated in the ro la case ● Take the text from the romanian guidelines: from art 13: paragraph 2,3,5,6,7,8. ● Indicate the number of copies: one for authorities, one for beneficiary, both copies have the same power in front of the court ● Duration of the contract ● Also take article 14: tot 8. Drawing procedures ● Article 15 from ro la ● Start with paragraph 6 - idea that financing is given only for activites regarding the project ● Second idea is that beneficiary must submit a request for subsidies and other docs at a specific date or specific period indicated in the contract only for services already performed - paragraph 3 ● Documents needed are indicated in article 16: ○ Request for financing: form indicated in the annex of the contract ○ Invoices issued by the railway operator for every client interested in container transport (subpunctul a) ) - dovada ca transportul s a facut ○ Fara b) ○ Copies of the transport docs - consignment notes ○ Rest of the docs are financial docs - indicating that the operator payed its taxes and duties in time ■ Ask for licence of railway operator and for the safety certificate if this documents were renewed from the last drawing or from the beginning of the project; ● Requirements for these docs: articolul 17 ro la document ○ Style in which these docs are written and ordered ○ Extract only what is specific to our programme ○ It is recommended that for every drawing there is a list of all transports for which a subsidy is requested 9. Miscellaneous ● Rules about project monitoring: the representatives of the authority must be allowed every time to check the financial and fiscal docs related to the transports in order to check that the request for funds are correct. They can perform checks at HQ and other working points of the beneficiaries and if they find negative aspects they can impose corrections. ● All data, info, instructions in connection with the programme are allowed to be oublished on the website of the authority in order to ensure the transparency of the programme ● The beneficiaries must indicate in every communication in mass media / scientific paper that the achievements are due to the subsidies offered by the authority.