Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
General Engineering
Volume 16 Issue 4 Version 1.0 Year 2016
Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal
Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA)
Online ISSN: 2249-4596 & Print ISSN:0975-5861
EffectofImpellerBladeSlotonCentrifugalPumpPerformance
© 2016. A. Farid Ayad Hassan, H. M. Abdalla & A. S. Abo El-Azm Aly. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/),
permitting all non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Effect of Impeller Blade Slot on Centrifugal
Pump Performance
A. Farid Ayad Hassan α, H. M. Abdalla σ & A. S. Abo El-Azm Aly ρ
Abstract- The effect of impeller backward blades with slot on the splitter would help better conduct energy to the flow.
the centrifugal pump performance has been investigated However, a drop in total efficiency has been noticed in
numerically. Impeller blades have been modified with different some cases due to the increase of the hydraulic friction
geometrical parameters of slot such as: slot radial position
between the pumping fluid and the splitter blades.
(Rs), slot height (hs) and slot inclination angle (θs). 3-D
The pump geometrical parameters remain the
2016
numerical simulation has been carried out using commercial
software, ANSYS® CFX, to study the effect on the pump greatest interest of all researchers looking for improving
Year
performance at different flow rates. The numerical simulation the centrifugal pump performance. Some authors made
has been compared with previously published experimental optimization on the blade exit angle and they found that
results to verify the numerical solution. In addition, the results with increasing the blade exit angle the head increases 71
have been compared with the impeller without slots for the but the efficiency decreases [8-12]. Some other authors
C
entrifugal pumps are probably among the most progressive increments of blade outlet width. In
often used machinery in industrial facilities as well addition, the high efficiency area in the large flow rate
as in common practice. After being invented, they region gets bigger and the area in low flow rate region
passed long evolutionary way until they became changes a little with the increase of blade outlet width.
accessible for various applications. A few centuries ago, Some authors tried to improve the pump
Euler described their physical principle through a well- performance by making a slot in the impeller blade. The
known equation named after him “Euler's equation for first one who start adopting this technique was E.A.
turbomachinery”. Ahmed [18, 19]. Then, M. Saffaa and his group [20-22]
Since then, many studies have been conducted developed this work using their own 2-D numerical code
to improve the centrifugal pump performance. These to solve a laminar flow inside the pump impeller. In an
studies used a lot of methods and ideas seeking a attempt to examine the effect on the pump performance,
better centrifugal pump performance through attempts Hongxun [23] used a similar technique and made a
to increase the pump total efficiency and slip factor. comparison between the draughting technique and the
One of these methods that took a lot of interest splitter blades.
was to improve the pump performance by impeller In the present work, a parametric study is
trimming [1-4]. These studies found that as the diameter attempted, based on the blade slot technique to
is reduced, the head and power curves decrease investigate the effect of three slot geometrical
continuously. The efficiency, however, will increase at parameters, namely slot radial position (Rs), slot height
first and then drop for a certain value of diameter. The (hs) and slot inclination angle (θs) on the impeller
main reason for this might be attributed to the growth of performance. The study implements a 3-D numerical
the gap between the impeller and stator as the impeller simulation of turbulent flow inside the centrifugal
diameter is reduced. impeller.
Another attempt to improve the centrifugal
pump performance lies in adding splitter blades II. Computational Model
between the main blades [5-7]. Unfortunately, such
solution was found to render negative and positive a) Geometrical Models
effects on the pump behavior. It increases the head as The centrifugal pump impeller used by [20, 24],
compared to the original impeller. This was explained by shown in Figure (1), is chosen as a geometrical model
the fact that increasing the impeller slip factor in effect of to apply numerical computation. The main metrics of
Author α: Associate Lecturer, Aerospace Department, MTC, Cairo, pump design and performance are listed in Table (1).
Egypt. e-mail: a.farid.mtc@gmail.com
The flow patterns and the hydraulic work, only an isolated impeller has been considered.
2016
performance of the isolated impeller (without volute) This is justified by the need to simplify the present study
must differ from that of the impeller with volute [25]. This that is considered as a preliminary investigation.
Year
2016 Year
73
𝑆𝑢𝑖 = −𝜌[2 𝜔
⃗ ×𝑢 ⃗ × (𝜔
⃗ + 𝜔 ⃗ × 𝑟)] (3)
𝜕𝑢̅𝑖 𝜕𝑢̅𝑗
𝜏̅𝑖𝑗 = −𝜇 ( + ) (4)
𝜕𝑥𝑗 𝜕𝑥𝑖
c) Computational Domain
The computational domain consists of three
zones: inlet, impeller and outlet as shown in Figure (3).
74
Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( J ) Volume XVI Iss ue IV Version I
2016 Year
75
e) Boundary Conditions and Zones Interface boundary defined at the blade. The impeller zone is
The boundary conditions are set as mass flow modeled in the rotating frame, and the outlet and the
at inlet and the static pressure at outlet. A rotational inlet zones are modeled in the fixed reference frame.
periodicity is adopted at the other outer boundaries of Figure (6) illustrate the definition of the boundary
the domain. A no-slip condition is imposed at the wall conditions.
76
Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( J ) Volume XVI Iss ue IV Version I
𝑚̇
𝜌 (𝑃𝑡𝑜𝑢𝑡 − 𝑃𝑡𝑖𝑛 ) (6)
𝜂ℎ𝑖𝑚𝑝 =
𝑇∙𝜔
Figure (8) and Figure (9) show the variation of
the impeller head and hydraulic efficiency with flow rate,
respectively, for both impellers with and without slot.
Experimental measurement show that the slot with the
parameters of reference [20] reduces the impeller head.
The slot shows a minor impact on the efficiency
however, adding the slot increases the efficiency below
the operating point and reduces the efficiency beyond
the operating point. These effects of adding slot could
be explained by the considerable reduction in the
effective blade length and augmentation of flow rate
through the slot, which in this case represents about
17% of the design flow rate.
2016 Year
77
78
Figure 10: Impeller relative velocity vector at flow rate Q=1 L/s on mid span
Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( J ) Volume XVI Iss ue IV Version I
Figure 11: Impeller relative velocity vector at flow rate Q=3.5 L/s on mid span
Figure 12: Impeller static pressure contour at flow rate Q=3.5 L/s at mid span
IV. Results and Discussions the slot parameters that affect the impeller performance,
Table (2). When making a slot in the impeller blade the
A single arc blade design is assumed, and the fluid goes through this slot from the pressure side to the
pump speed is chosen n = 1500 rpm with impeller outer suction side with certain flow rate. The convergence of
diameter D2 = 130 mm and impeller inner diameter D1 this mass flow rate is shown in Figure (13).
= 50 mm. The other dimensions are chosen according
to Table (1). Fifteen cases have been studied to cover
Table 2: Different cases of slot parameters
2016
2 40
Position 𝑅𝑠
Slot radial
Year
3 45 Zero 1
79
4 50
7 -45
angle (𝜃𝑠 )
8 45 -90 1
9 -110
10 -130
11 0.5
12 1
height ℎ𝑠
Slot
13 45 -90 1.5
14 2
15 2.5
80 Figure 13: Convergence history of flow rate through the slot (Case 3) at pump flow rate Q = 4 liter/s
Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( J ) Volume XVI Iss ue IV Version I
8 8
7.5 7.5 no slot
7 7
no slot
6.5 6.5
Head (m)
Head (m)
6 6 no slot
CFD, No Slot
5.5 CFD, Case 1 5.5
CFD, Case 2
5 CFD, Case 3 5 CFD, Q=2 liter/s
CFD, Case 4 CFD, Q=3 liter/s
4.5 4.5
CFD, Case 5 CFD, Q=4 liter/s
4 4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 25 35 45 55 65
Flow Rate (liter/s) Slot Position Rs (mm)
Figure 14: Effect of slot radial position Rs on the impeller head, hs = 1mm & θs = 0°
0.9 0.9
no slot
0.85
0.85 no slot
0.8
0.75 0.8
no slot
Efficiency
0.7
Efficiency
Figure 15: Effect of slot radial position Rs on the impeller hydraulic Efficiency hs = 1mm & θs = 0°
b) Effect of Slot Inclination Angle results show that the high negative inclination angle
The effect of the slot inclination angle on the causes higher heads as shown in Figure (16). This
impeller head is addressed in the cases (6-10). From increase in head was due to the rise in slip factor. The
the blade geometry there is a constrain on the slot effect of the slot inclination angle on the hydraulic
inclination angle and it should be chosen according to efficiency of the impeller is shown in Figure (17). Sharp
Eq.(7) reduction in efficiency is noted at slot inclination θs <
−110° this drop in efficiency is attributed to the high
−180 + 𝛽 < 𝜃𝑠 < 𝛽 (7) change in the relative velocity direction. A similar drop in
efficiency can be noted in at slot inclination angle θs >
where β = blade angle at slot radial position Rs, 0°.
8 8
no slot
2016
7.5 7.5
Year
7 7
no slot
6.5 6.5
Head (m)
Head (m)
81
6 6 no slot
Figure 16: Effect of slot inclination angle θs on the impeller head, Rs = 45 mm & hs = 1 mm
1 1
0.9 with Slot 0.9 no slot
0.8 0.8
0.7 0.7
0.6
Efficiency
0.6
Efficiency
0.5 0.5
0.4 CFD, No Slot
0.4
CFD, Case 6
0.3 CFD, Case 7 0.3
CFD, Case 8 CFD, Q=2 liter/s
0.2 CFD, Q=3 liter/s
0.2
CFD, Case 9
0.1 CFD, Case 10 CFD, Q=4 liter/s 0.1
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 -140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40
Flow Rate (liter/s) Slot Inclination angle θs (deg)
Figure 17: Effect of slot inclination angle θs on the Impeller hydraulic efficiency, Rs = 45 mm & hs = 1 mm
8 8
7.5 7.5
no slot
7 7
6.5 6.5 no slot
Head (m)
Head (m)
6 6
CFD, No Slot no slot
5.5 CFD, Case 11 5.5
CFD, Case 12 CFD, Q=2 liter/s
5 CFD, Case 13
5
CFD, Q=3 liter/s
CFD, Case 14 4.5
4.5 CFD, Q=4 liter/s
CFD, Case 15
2016
4 4
Year
0.95 0.9
no slot
0.9
0.85 no slot
0.85
0.8 0.8
no slot
Efficiency
0.75
0.75
Efficiency
CFD, No Slot
0.7
CFD, Case 11
0.65 CFD, Case 12
0.7 CFD, Q=2 liter/s
CFD, Case 13 CFD, Q= 3liter/s
0.6 0.65
CFD, Case 14 CFD, Q=4 liter/s
0.55 CFD, Case 15
0.6
0.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Slot Height hs (mm)
Flow Rate (liter/s)
Figure 19: Effect of slot height hs on the impeller hydraulic efficiency, Rs = 45 mm & θs = −90°
d) Impact of Slot on Flow Field Features The velocity vector in the blade slot shows that
Figure (20) shows the relative velocity vectors the velocity has a large value at the slot upper half. In
on the mid span at flow rate Q = 4L/s (case 11) for case of high inclination angle the velocity has a reverse
impeller with and without slots. Formation of a vortex on flow in the lower slot region. The velocity in the slot has
the suction side with the same angular direction of the maximum value (about 5.8 m⁄s). The flow rate inside the
impeller rotation increases the slip factor and hence slot is proportional to the slot height, in case of hs = 1
increases the head. mm the slot flow rate is about 0.055 liter⁄s with the total
Figure (21) shows the difference in pressure flow rate equal to 4 liter⁄s as shown in Figure (13), which
along the blade pressure and suction sides. Clearly, the represents ≈ 1.4%.
pressure difference above the slot is higher than the
pressure difference in case of blade without slot.
To illustrate the effect of the blade slot on the
performance of the impeller, the pressure contours and
the velocity vector inside the slot are shown in Figure
(22) and Figure (23). The pressure contours inside the
slot show that the pressure force in the slot with
inclination angle (case 3) has positive direction with y-
axis. In addition, for (case 9) the pressure force has a
negative direction with the y-axis.
2016 Year
83
Figure 20: Relative velocity vectors on mid span at flow rate Q =4 L/s
Figure 22: (a) pressure contours, and (b) relative velocity vector a cross the slot (case 3) at flow rate Q = 4L/s
84
Global Journal of Researches in Engineering ( J ) Volume XVI Iss ue IV Version I
Figure 23: (a) pressure contours, and (b) relative velocity vector a cross the slot (case 9) at flow rate Q = 4L/s
10. M. Patel and A. Doshi, "Effect of Impeller Blade Exit Vane Impeller for Better Centrifugal Pump
Angle on the Performance of Centrifugal Pump," Performance," presented at the 11-th International
Intrnational Journal of Emerging Technology and Conference on Aerospace Science & Aviation
Advanced Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 702-709, 2013. Technology, MTC, Cairo, Egypt, 2005.
11. E. Bacharoudis, A. Filios, M. Mentzos, and D. 23. C. Hongxun, L. Weiwei, J. Wen, and W. Peiru,
Margaris, "Parametric study of a centrifugal pump "Impellers of low specific speed centrifugal pump
impeller by varying the outlet blade angle," Open based on the draughting technology," in IOP
Mechanical Engineering Journal, vol.2, pp. 75-83, Conference Series: Earth and Environmental
2008. Science, 12, 2010.
12. M. H. S. Fard and F. Boyaghchi, "Studies on the 24. W. Wahba, "Flow Pattern in a Centrifugal Pump
Influence of Various Blade Outlet Angles in a Used in Turbo-Pump Feeding System," MSc, MTC,
Centrifugal Pump when Handling Viscous Fluids," Egypt, 1997.
American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol.4, pp. 25. L. Wen-Guang, "Numerical study on behavior of a
2016
718-724, 2007. centrifugal pump when delivering viscous oils-part
13. S. Chakraborty, K. Pandey, and B. Roy, "Numerical 1: performance," International Journal of Turbo and
Year
Analysis on Effects of Blade Number Variations on Jet Engines, vol. 25, pp. 61-79, 2008.
Performance of Centrifugal Pumps with Various 26. "ANSYS® 14.5.7 CFX-Solver Theory Guide," 2012. 85
Rotational Speeds," International Journal of Current 27. M. Shojaeefard, M. Tahani, M. Ehghaghi, M.
Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, pp. 143-152, Fallahian, and M. Beglari, "Numerical study of the