Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
No. DNV-RP-H101
Offshore Service Specifications. Provide principles and procedures of DNV classification, certification, verification
and consultancy services.
Offshore Standards. Provide technical provisions and acceptance criteria for general use by the offshore industry as
well as the technical basis for DNV offshore services.
Recommended Practices. Provide proven technology and sound engineering practice as well as guidance for the
higher level Offshore Service Specifications and Offshore Standards.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This Recommended Practice is the result of a Joint Industry Project (JIP) with the objectives to develop guidelines for Risk
Management within marine operations. The following companies sponsored and contributed to the work:
As part of publishing this RP, a draft copy was sent for hearing to several additional companies. Constructive feedback and
comments were obtained through this process. DNV appreciate time and effort given to the hearing by these companies.
© Det Norske Veritas. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying
and recording, without the prior written consent of Det Norske Veritas.
Printed in Norway
If any person suffers loss or damage which is proved to have been caused by any negligent act or omission of Det Norske Veritas, then Det Norske Veritas shall pay compensation to such
person for his proved direct loss or damage. However, the compensation shall not exceed an amount equal to ten times the fee charged for the service in question, provided that the maximum
compensation shall never exceed USD 2 million.
In this provision "Det Norske Veritas" shall mean the Foundation Det Norske Veritas as well as all its subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees, agents and any other acting on behalf of Det
Norske Veritas.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction ........................................................... 4 B.5 System HAZOP .....................................................21
1.1 General .................................................................... 4 B.6 FMEA/FMECA .....................................................22
1.2 Principles of Risk Management .............................. 4 B.7 Procedure HAZOP.................................................23
1.3 Terminology and Definitions .................................. 6 B.8 Semi-Quantitative Risk Assessments ....................25
2. Risk Management Planning ................................. 7 B.9 Safe Job Analysis...................................................25
2.1 General .................................................................... 7 App. C. Risk Reducing Activities .....................................29
2.2 Risk Management Plan............................................ 8 C.1 General ..................................................................29
3. References ............................................................ 14 C.2 Operational Feasibility Assessments .....................29
App. A. General Quality Assurance Activities................ 15 C.3 Document Verification ..........................................29
A.1 Objectives.............................................................. 15 C.4 Familiarisation .......................................................29
A.2 HSE&Q Activities................................................. 15 C.5 Personnel Safety Plans...........................................30
A.3 Pre-Qualification of Marine Operations C.6 Emergency Preparedness .......................................30
Contractors ............................................................ 15 C.7 Marine Readiness Verification ..............................31
A.4 Planning and Scheduling ....................................... 15 C.8 Inspection and Testing...........................................31
A.5 Personnel Qualifications and Job Descriptions ..... 16 C.9 Survey of Vessels ..................................................32
A.6 Deviation handling ................................................ 16 C.10 Toolbox Talk .........................................................32
A.7 Non-Conformance Reporting ................................ 17 C.11 Survey of Operations .............................................33
A.8 Near-Miss Reporting ............................................. 17 App. D. Miscellaneous .......................................................34
A.9 Incident and Accident Reporting........................... 17 D.1 Document Basis - Cross References ......................34
A.10 Experience Transfer .............................................. 18 D.2 Methodology - Flow Chart ....................................35
App. B. Hazard Identification Activities ......................... 19 D.3 Risk Accept Criteria Form (Sample) .....................36
B.1 General .................................................................. 19 D.4 Risk Management Plan - Check List (Sample)......37
B.2 HAZID .................................................................. 19 D.5 Risk Category Assessment Forms (Samples) ........39
B.3 Early Procedure HAZOP....................................... 20 D.6 Appendix Risk Management Plan (Sample)..........41
B.4 Design Review ...................................................... 20
January 2003
1.1.3 Basis
Basis for this Recommended Practice are principles and
recommendations given in references /1/, /2/ and /3/.
January 2003
Figure 1 – Methodology
RMP Check List Assesment RMP Check List RMP Check List
Process Forms Risk ID Activities Risk Reducing Activities
Sect. 2
Appendix D6
January 2003
January 2003
− Personnel safety
2. Risk Management Planning − Environment
− Assets
2.1 General − Reputation
2.1.1 Planning of Marine Operations
2.1.4 Risk Accept Criteria
It is considered essential that marine operations, including all
support activities are thoroughly assessed already at Risk is defined as the product of probability of occurrence
conceptual design stages. Risk management and quality and consequence, ref. Appendix D3.
assurance processes will then be a positive influence rather
than a restrictive constraint on progress. Marine operations Consequence Categories
and the handled objects should be designed with due Consequence should be divided into categories. Each
consideration to resisting characteristic loads and conditions category should have specific criteria in compliance with the
as well as be practicable and safe. The planning process HSE policy and goals.
should address redundancy and backup philosophies as stated
Probability Categories
in /1/, as well as all other activities required to reach an
The probability categories should be qualitatively described,
acceptable risk level.
with supplementary guidance if needed. Guidance is
The planning process should include assessment of personnel recommended related (subjectively) to experiences from
exposure and possibilities for reducing this through use of similar type of operations, ref. Appendix D3.
remotely operated tools and handling systems.
Risk Categories
The consequence and probability categories will define risk.
2.1.2 HSE Zero Mindset This RP recommends the following terms for categorisation
Basis for this RP is a zero accident, incident and loss of marine operation risk:
philosophy. To satisfy this philosophy a "zero mindset"
should be promoted and supported. One important element in − High
the "zero mindset" is the understanding and implementation − Medium
of the principles of ALARP. − Low
January 2003
January 2003
2.2.4 Defined Objects and Operations A proposed Assessment Form is included in Appendix D5.
The planned project should be reviewed and assessed in
2.2.6 Hazard Identification and Risk Reducing Activities
order to identify objects and operations to be considered in
the risk management process. The overall assessment and following categorisation is
performed to create a basis for definition of further risk
An overview should be updated regularly, reflecting new identification and risk reducing activities. Tables below list
objects and/or revised methods/operations. In the RMP each recommended activities as a function of potential risk
operation should have define start and end points, main categories. Listed activities are further described in appendix
responsibilities, and (when overall assessment is completed) A, B and C.
the potential risk category.
Generally QA activities are assumed based on the already
2.2.5 Categorisations of Operations established QA system. The activities listed in Table 2.2 are
meant as emphasis of activities considered of particular
According to the defined HSE policy, and as basis for importance.
specifying required QA activities, risk identification
activities and risk reducing activities for the planned Activities found required for the specific operation should be
operations should be categorised into the following potential included in checklists specifying responsibilities, deadlines,
risk categories: status, etc. for each activity. These lists will be part of the
RMP, and tools for monitoring and maintaining status for
− Low specified activities. A proposed format for the checklists is
− Medium given in Appendix D4. The checklists are recommended to
− High include the following main sections;
The categorisation should be made according to the
− General QA activities, ref. Table 2.2
principles as described in 1.2.1. Records of concerns,
− Risk identification activities (for object & operation),
highlights and/or comments identified during the assessment
ref. Table 2.3
with respect to risk, feasibility, installability or performance
of the operations should be made. − Risk reducing activities (for object & operations), ref.
Table 2.4.
Qualifications for personnel participating in the assessment
should comply with 2.1.5. A group sized to reflect the
complexity of the operations should perform the assessment.
Too large groups should be avoided.
January 2003
On site/field Deviation Deviation to be logged in Formal procedures and routines to be Formal procedures and routines
Handling e.g. vessel log. developed. to be developed.
Ref. Appendix A6 SJA normally to be performed. Acceptance by required parties
Deviation to be logged and reported. to be documented
Routines for deviation handling SJA to be performed.
established well before performance of Deviation to be logged and
operations reported.
Routines for deviation handling
established well before
performance of operations
Non-conformance Procedure shall be Procedure shall be established and formal routines be followed.
reporting established and formal Non-conformances, near-misses and incidents to be logged in vessel log,
Near-miss reporting and routines be followed. daily report and project register, and discussed in daily meetings.
registration Non-conformances, near- Reports and meetings shall be listed.
Incident reporting and misses and incidents to be
registration logged in e.g. vessel log.
Experience transfer ISO and NORSOK
requirements apply, see
Ref. Appendix A7,A8, A9, ref. /2/, /4/ and /5/.
A10
(*) For a series of similar, repetitive "medium risk" type operations the requirements to "low risk" operations apply after the first typical
operation is performed.
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
Other References
3. References
/4/ S-012N, NORSOK "Helse, miljø og Sikkerhet /HMS)
/1/ "DNV Rules for Planning and Execution of Marine ved Byggerelatert Virksomhet"
Operations"
/5/ Z-013 NORSOK Standard "Risk and Emergency
/2/ ISO 9001-2000, "Quality Management Systems Preparedness Analysis."
Requirements"
/6/ NPD - Forskrift om Helse Miljø og Sikkerhet i
/3/ NS-ISO 17776, "Petroleum and natural gas industries, Petroleumsvirksomhet, Rammeforskriften
Offshore Production Installations, Guidelines on Tools and 31. august 2001.
Techniques for Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment"
January 2003
A.3.3 Performance
Appendix A. - General Quality Assurance The list of pre-qualified contractors will be established based
Activities on an evaluation made by contracts personnel and technical
personnel. Essential in the evaluation is previous experience
A.1 Objectives with the contractor, including number and nature of incidents
This appendix generally assume that parties involved in and accidents and the ability to deliver their services on time,
marine operations have a quality assurance (QA) system in as well as availability of critical resources, equipment, etc.
compliance with /2/. This appendix is hence meant as
emphasising and supplementary to activities considered of The pre-qualification activity should result in a list of
particular importance. contractors defined as technically qualified and capable for
the foreseen scope or responsibility. The list is normally
basis for being invited to bid.
A.2 HSE&Q Activities
HSE&Q goals shall be developed and defined early in the A.4 Planning and Scheduling
project. The RMP is considered an important tool in order to
achieve these goals. A.4.1 Purpose
All HSE&Q activities relevant for the marine operations Plans and schedules are required in order to meet the project
shall be included on the RMP, such as applicable risk milestones and will the basis for timing of contract awards
identification activities described in Appendix B, audits, and marine operations. Schedules and plans should identify
survey of vessels, verification of preparations and operations critical decisions and document issues, and ensure that
etc. dependent activities can be performed within a realistic
timeframe.
A.3 Pre-Qualification of Marine Operations
A.4.2 Application
Contractors
Central in document planning is the Master Document
A.3.1 Purpose Register (MDR). Schedules will be developed on various
Purpose of this pre-qualification activity is to assess levels. An overall project schedule will be the basis for all
qualifications for a Contractor with respect to a foreseen project activities. Detailed schedules for the marine
scope or responsibility. Major oil companies have internal operations should be included as part of the Risk
procedures for pre-qualification of contractors in accordance Management Plan.
with applicable rules and regulations. Less formalised
approaches may be used for smaller projects/individual A.4.3 Expected Input
operations or contractors with limited responsibility. Input to plans and schedules are the project milestones. Input
to detailed schedules, including the RMP, will be the overall
A pre-qualification activity is recommended for all marine project schedule.
operations contracts in order to assess interested contractors
before being invited to bid.
A.4.4 Performance
A.3.2 Expected Input Important documents could be linked up to contract cost
plans and/or penalty milestones, in order to ensure timely
Potential contractors are frequently listed in databases, which delivery.
can be screened based on selection criteria applicable for the
contract. Additionally potential contractors are usually well Schedules shall be developed and reviewed by the project
known in the industry based on jobs performed in the past. management to comply with the project goals and
Important input to pre-qualification of contractors are milestones. Incentives for meeting goals and milestones may
typically: be considered. If used these are recommended triggered
when meeting individual tasks, typically having document
− Compliance with industry standards on quality and HSE approved IFC at planned date, etc.
− Personnel qualifications and resources
− Vessels and equipment Marine Operations Manuals should be developed to describe
− Computer programs the planned operation. These should be issued in minimum
− Previous experience, including safety culture in three revisions:
organisation or onboard vessel, organisation of work,
experience transfer, and finally number and nature of Revision 1
incidents and accidents. Describing methods and main principles. Revision to be
issued 1 - 4 months after contract award (IDC status). Basis
for EPH.
January 2003
When establishing a project organisation, management is A deviation request may be initiated by the vessel Captain,
responsible for establishing job descriptions where work the Operations Manager/Superintendent, Client/Company or
tasks and requirements to personnel are given. the Project Manager (deviation request originator) for
handling due to the rapid response time required. A deviation
A.5.5 Deliverables permit shall be obtained before proceeding with the
deviation.
Job descriptions and organisation charts.
The deviation request originator shall keep a copy of the
A.6 Deviation handling permit and be responsible for the immediate implementation
of the approved deviation according to the agreed plan.
A.6.1 Purpose
The purpose of formal deviation handling is to ensure All completed deviation requests/permits shall be filed and
compliance with project requirements for proposed retained as formal quality records.
deviation. This shall include familiarisation of personnel and
adequate engineering and verification of the proposed A.6.5 Deliverables
deviation.
A brief, concise description of the proposed deviation shall
be entered as part of the deviation request together with
A.6.2 Application expected impacts. Relevant documentation shall be
Formal deviation handling applies to all significant changes referenced. The deviation request/permit shall be logged in
to approved procedures. Deviation handling shall be the operations log and/or the appropriate vessel log onboard.
complete before the corresponding deviation is
implemented/performed, unless immediate action has to be
taken for obvious safety reasons.
January 2003
A.7 Non-Conformance Reporting All completed Corrective Action Requests shall be filed and
retained as formal quality records.
A.7.1 Purpose
Non-conformance reporting is performed and corresponding A.8 Near-Miss Reporting
corrective actions implemented to prevent reoccurrence of a
failure or an unintentional action or activity. A.8.1 Purpose
Adequate near-miss reporting, handling and registration is
A.7.2 Application important in order to reduce the number of incidents and
Non-conformances that have occurred shall be reported. accidents to an absolute minimum and as means for
Corrective actions shall be implemented as deemed relevant experience feedback, i.e. it is in no way in conflict with the
to avoid repetitive non-conformances (NC). A non- zero-incident target philosophy. It is a management
conformance reporting procedure and corrective action responsibility to ensure that all personnel are briefed on the
handling procedure shall be developed and implemented by importance of reporting near misses and encouraged to report
the project. these.
When the planned corrective action has been completed, A.9 Incident and Accident Reporting
reviews shall be undertaken at regular intervals to ensure that
the action has had the desired effect of ensuring against a A.9.1 Purpose
recurrence of the NC. The purpose of incident and accident reporting is primarily to
avoid reoccurrence but also to inform the involved
A.7.5 Deliverables companies and relevant authorities, as required by law and
Details of the corrective action carried out and the results of regulations.
the action shall be fully recorded and contained in a report,
which will form the basis of the closeout of the CAR. A.9.2 Application
All incidents and accidents during a marine operation shall
When the corrective action has been implemented to the
be reported.
satisfaction of all parties, the CAR recipient shall fill in and
sign the close-out section of the CAR form.
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
B.2.5 Deliverables
HAZID is normally reported in tables typically formatted as
in Table B1. In case the HAZID is combined with a SQRA,
see Appendix B8 the parameter "Risk Value" should be
included.
Operation: _________________________________
Activity Undesired Description of Existing risk Risk value Actions/ Responsible for Comments
event consequences reducing PxC=R measures to implementation
measures (SQRA only) reduce/ of actions
(probability eliminate risk
and/or
consequence)
January 2003
Table B2 – Guidewords
Guidewords Description
No/Not/Don’t The intended material is not present. No substitute material is present. The intended activity does not
occur. No direct substitute activity takes place.
More A higher quantity of material than intended e.g. weight or volume. Higher physical condition e.g.
higher pressure. A higher activity than intended e.g. flow rate, pressure rise, heat input, chemical
reaction or duration of activity.
Less A smaller quantity of material than intended e.g. weight or volume. Lower physical condition e.g.
lower pressure. A lower activity than intended e.g. flow rate, pressure decrease, heat input, chemical
reaction or duration of activity.
As well as An additional component present, an additional physical condition and/or an additional activity.
Unwanted side reactions.
Other than A totally different material, physical condition or activity.
Part of One or more intended components or desired activities are missing. Some desired physical condition
is absent.
January 2003
Guidewords Description
Reverse The logical opposite of the desired material, physical condition or desired activity.
Sooner/Later Sooner or later than intended.
Table B3 – Parameters
Parameter Description
Physical parameters related to Parameters selected for a structured examination of the intended medium itself and its
input medium properties properties and characteristics.
Physical parameters for Parameters selected to study possible deviations from the intended condition (mass,
possible deviations of the volume, pressure, temperature, etc.) of the medium
medium condition
Physical parameters related to Parameters selected to study the dynamics of the system.
system dynamics
Parameters related to system Parameters not necessarily used in conjunction with the guideword list, such as.
operation
− Instrumentation
− Relief
− Start-up(shut-down
− Maintenance
− Safety/contingency
− Sampling
B.6.2 Application
B.5.10 Operating Modus
FMEA is an analytical technique used to identify failure
The definition of operating modus is an important input in
modes and associated effects (hazards) that will without
formulating the design intent.
adequate precautions give rise to a hazardous event. FMEA
In cases where a system or a system element changes from work sheets may be directly used as part of the project risk
one operation modus to another, it may be applicable to register.
examine the various stages or phases the system undergoes.
In such cases on would start with an initial stage with the B.6.3 Expected Input
initial system configuration, going through a transient stage The input the a FMEA/FMECA is a detailed system
where the system condition and dynamics go into the final description (general arrangement drawings, P&IDs,
stage at a certain rate. In such cases the definition of stages specifications, etc.) and operational procedures.
will be part of the basis for formulating the design intent.
January 2003
System: _________________________________
Activity Equipment/ Function Id. no Failure Failure Failure Failure Alternative Risk Remarks
no. component mode effect - effect – detecti provisions/ value
name local end on redundancy PxC=R
effect (for
FMECA
only)
− Avoid incidents, i.e. fulfil the zero incident target B.7.3 Expected Input
philosophy The input/basis for a procedure HAZOP is an operations
− Increase safety during the operations procedure. The operations procedure shall be at an advanced
− Reduce sources for operational delays stage, i.e. be fully complete and reflect all relevant aspects of
− Identify areas of improvement. the operation in detail.
In addition a procedure HAZOP can be regarded as a natural
part of the familiarisation process and hence be regarded as a B.7.4 Planning
technical team building for key personnel. A HAZOP shall be properly planned. Such planning shall
include:
B.7.2 Application
− Detailed timing, sufficient time shall be allowed to
Procedure HAZOP analysis is applicable to all marine adequately cover the scope of the HAZOP.
operations. In procedure HAZOP analysis, an − Base documents (operations procedure, etc.) to be
interdisciplinary team uses a systematic approach to identify available
hazards and operability problems as a result of missing
− Selection of HAZOP Leader and HAZOP Secretary
information, errors or deviations from a procedure which
− Identification of participants
may result in an undesired event.
− Preparation and issuance of a detailed agenda to all
All issues relevant to identification of hazards shall be participants
subject to discussions to the extent necessary to conclude the − Preparation of guidewords list
identification. Emphasis shall be put on identification of The timing for a procedure HAZOP is typically 4 – 6 weeks
contingencies/back -up solutions. It is, however, not within before mobilisation. It is important that there is sufficient
the scope of a HAZOP to solve the problem, i.e. a limited time after the HAZOP has been performed to implement the
amount of time shall be spent on discussing solutions. The results from the HAZOP in the procedure and operations
HAZOP as developed and used today is a tool to identify planning without any consequential delays to the operation.
hazards and potential operational problems, and unless the
solutions to these possible problems are immediately evident,
the HAZOP shall refrain from finding solutions and carrying
out redesign.
January 2003
January 2003
− HAZOP of Activity no. 2 with corresponding steps potential hazards or deviations from procedures, which could
(Responsible: HAZOP Leader/HAZOP Team) etc. cause problems, are identified and satisfactory dealt with. A
− Summing up/Adjourn (Responsible: HAZOP Leader) typical set of guidewords for a marine operation procedure
HAZOP is presented in Table B5. Additional or other
guidewords may be applicable:
B.7.11 Guidewords
A set of guidewords shall be used during the HAZOP
sessions in order to ensure that all safety aspects and
Guideword Description
Weather Unclear weather restrictions or unexpected deterioration of weather. Weather forecasting
Impact Impact between objects
Position Object, grillage or barge not in correct position
Drop Drop of objects from a higher level
Power No power or insufficient power
Instruments Malfunction or lack of instruments
Communication Malfunction or lack of communication equipment. Communication lines
Movement Objects or vessels move in an uncontrolled way
Stability Unstable conditions
Tolerances Tolerances for positioning, grillage tolerances, barge tolerances, etc.
Stuck Movement cannot be performed
Rupture Rupture of critical equipment
Access Insufficient access
Not cut No or insufficient cutting of items to be cut before an activity can start
Barriers No or insufficient barriers
Tension High tension in e.g. running wires or wire slings
Execution A work task is executed in a wrong way
Procedures Missing or unclear procedures
Environmental Potential environmental pollution
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
Job Description
Participants
Name Signature
_______________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_______________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_______________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_______________________________________________ ____________________________________________
_______________________________________________
____________________________________________
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
Priority 1 - Fundamental: Important to be carried out before the marine operation activity to which the recommendation pertains.
Priority 2 - Significant: Recommended to be carried out before the relevant marine operation to ensure the expected quality of the activity.
Priority 3 - Less important: Desirable to be carried out.
January 2003
Temporary systems and equipment are often used during C.9.2 Application
marine operations. Experience shows that the majority of All vessels having a key role shall be surveyed before start of
mechanical failures are related to temporary equipment. This a marine operation.
is often due to lack of testing, poor maintenance, damages
during transport and mal-operation. For temporary systems
C.9.3 Expected Input
like e.g. winches the following testing apply:
The survey will be performed onboard the vessel in question.
− Individual component tests A check that all vessel certificates are valid is normally a part
− Function integration testing of the survey.
− Full capacity testing
− Testing of metering systems, etc. C.9.4 Performance
− Test of back-up systems, including switch over from Vessels normally follow a regulatory certification
main system to back-up programme determined by their Class and international
and/or national regulations. A vessel survey will hence
Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) shall also be tested normally be a check that all certificates are valid during the
both dry and in water, including deep water testing as far as duration of the operation. Additionally it is recommended
practicable in order to avoid delays during the operation. that the survey also include inspection of maintenance
Compatible components shall be selected. The ROVs shall records and towing logs for tow vessels. It is also advised
be tested with all remotely operated tools to be used during that the vessel track/performance records, including safety
the operation, in order to ensure adequate capacity and no culture, organisation of work and are checked, i.e. previous
interference between the various ROV systems and tools. performance within same projects or for same company.
Testing of communication lines shall be performed before Suitability surveys may be conducted in order to verify
start of an operation. This includes radio channels and adequacy for intended use at an early stage.
telephone lines and is a check on the equipment and
application in the surroundings of intended use. Particular
attention shall be paid to selection of communication C.9.5 Deliverables
equipment for use in noisy conditions and when working Surveys shall be documented by a survey report.
close to platforms (shadow effect). Additional external
antennas may be required. C.10 Toolbox Talk
In situations where complex reporting or logging is to be C.10.1 Purpose
performed a test on this may be found relevant, in order to Toolbox talks are performed by operations personnel to
avoid delays in the operation due to logging. ensure timely detailed knowledge of all relevant operations
Mobilisation operations are normally very hectic. In order to activities, such that the work is accomplished safely without
minimise the time for testing, a detailed test programme shall accidents.
be established in due time before the mobilisation. Systems
and components that may be tested before mobilisation shall C.10.2 Application
be checked out well in advance of the mobilisation. For Toolbox talks are applicable for all marine activities and
extensive mobilisation operations a separate task force may should be performed before commencement of such
be established following up the testing. activities.
A good system for transport, maintenance and storage of
C.10.3 Expected Input
temporary systems shall be in force. The use and
maintenance of temporary systems and equipment shall be Input may be operational procedures, drawings, verbal
traceable. descriptions of the planned activity or operation or lessons
learnt from previous activities.
C.8.5 Deliverables
C.10.4 Performance
The results of testing shall be documented in test reports.
Supervisors should perform toolbox talks together with their
workforces.
C.9 Survey of Vessels
C.9.1 Purpose Typical activities as part of a toolbox talk are:
Survey of vessels is primarily performed to document the − Define the activities step by step.
suitability for the intended use. − Identify the risk elements.
− Describe work activities in detail.
On/off-hire surveys may be conducted to assess the condition
before and after use, being a basis for claims in case of
damages and to determine consumption of fuel, lubes, water,
etc.
January 2003
C.11.5 Deliverables
Surveys shall be documented by a survey report.
January 2003
Appendix D. - Miscellaneous
D.1 Document Basis - Cross References
Document This Document ISO 9001:2000 /2/ NS - ISO 17776 /3/ NORSOK S-012N /4/
Step
Overall Risk Assessment - Sect. 2 - 7.3.1 - Sec. 3, - Sect. 5.2,
- Sec. 5.3 - (Sec. 7)
- Annex B14
Risk Management Plan - Sect. 2 - 4.1 - Sect. 5.1 - Sect 5.1,
- 6.2.2 - (Sec. 6),
-7
Area/Activity related Risk ID and - Appendix A, B, C - Sec. 3, - Sect. 5.3
Assessment - Sec. 5.3,
- Annex B (gen.)
Risk Reducing Activities - Appendix A, B, C - Sec. 3, Sec. 5.4, - Sect. 5.4
- Annex B (gen.)
January 2003
Conclusions:
High, Medium, Low potential risk
Category
OK?
No
Yes
January 2003
Medium Risk
Operation can be executed after cost efficient measures are implemented and the analyses team has found the risk
satisfactory (S).
Low Risk
Acceptable risk (A) subject to application of the principle of ALARP and those activities as specified in this RP.
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
Specifics Conclusion
Object Object 01.01 The specified operation was concluded as an operation
Operation xxxx within the potential risk category:
M M M L
Recommended Risk Category M M M L 12
Assessment Criteria
Consequence Exposure of EnvironmentAssets Reputation Marine Operation
Descriptive Personnel Potential Risk Categories
Extensive >10 Global or > 100 mill. Intenational
High (H)
national eff. imp./expos.
Severe >2 Local eff. At > 10 mill. Extensiv
Medium (M)
site (>10mill) national imp.
Moderate <2 Local eff. At < 10 mill. Limited
Low (L)
site (<10mill) national imp.
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003
January 2003