Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=uwisc.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of Wisconsin Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
SubStance.
http://www.jstor.org
The Itinerant Theorist:
Nature and Knowledge/Ecology
and Topology in Michel Serres
Paul A. Harris
thattheworldis comprehensible.
It is nolongerincomprehensible
82-83)
(Hermes,
#83,1997
SubStance 37
38 Paul A. Harris
the relation, constituted the route by which the first discourse passes"
(Hermes,49).
Like Odysseus, Serres pursues intricate routes in the hope of getting
back to the place where he truly belongs. But for Serres, the desired des-
tination is not the domestic domicile and the familiar dog. Serres seeks
something broader, more encompassing-what could be called the proper
ecological niche for humans. In his vision, humans belong to the world in
a simple, fundamental sense; ultimately, Serres insists, "nothing distin-
guishes me ontologically from a crystal, a plant, an animal" (Hermes,83). In
Serres's writing, this ontology joins up with a view that process, instability
and disorder constitute the primary "state" of things, resulting in a world
that at times comes to resemble Ovid's metamorphic natural order where
animals, humans, things and ideas constantly turn into one another. Where
does Serres himself figure in this world? "I am a whirlwind in turbulent
nature" (Hermes, 121); "Who am I? A tremor of nothingness, living in a
permanent earthquake" (Contract,124).
While these proclamations clearly serve a rhetorical function, they also
bring to the surface a strong undercurrent of Serres's thought: a desire to
efface the edge of difference between language and representation, to fuse
knowledge and being. This aspect of Serres's work finds its most explicit,
dramatic expression in TheNatural Contract,which culminates in a celebra-
tion of Serres's experience of the 1989 Loma Pieta quake in northern
California. "I tasted joy during the earthquake that terrified so many
people around me," Serres confesses. "All of a sudden the ground shakes
off its gear: walls tremble, ready to collapse, roofs buckle, people fall,
communications are interrupted, noise keeps you from hearing each other,
the thin technological film tears . . . " (124). Serres seems to have felt a
sublime if not erotic joy: "I saw her [the earth] formerly with my eyes and
my understanding; at last, through my belly and my feet, through my sex
I am her" (124). Transported out of his mind and engulfed by his body,
Serres found in this moment an "ecstasy" in his visceral connection with
"the background noise, the rumbling world" (124).1
The sublime shock that Serres testifies to feeling during the earthquake
figures as an irruption in the rhetoric of knowledge. The fissuring ground
where the edges of the Pacific and North American tectonic plates slip past
one another provides Serres with the appropriate setting for a new com-
SubStance#83, 1997
The Itinerant
The ItinerantTheorist
Theorist 39
39
prehension of the world. One could say that Serres attempts to evoke an
intimate, visceral knowledge of nature in order to redefine the nature of
knowledge. In her review of The Natural Contract, Malina Stefanovska
points out that "in his writing, rather than being posited as an outside
object, Nature is acknowledged as an inside force which breaks that dis-
course, and opens it up to a vigilant poetic meditation" (163-64). The
paradox involved in creating such a discourse is, of course, how to figure
nature in such a way that it appears "inside" the discourse as if it came
from outside it. And by extension, this paradox is related to a fundamental
tension that drives Serres's writing, which wavers between a desire to
forge an unmediated connection with the world and his ongoing project2to
weave together an encyclopedic discourse that restores our connection to
the world. But because it is the nature of knowledge in its institutionalized
state to become increasingly specialized and insular, the very erudition
that distinguishes Serres from his contemporaries is, ironically, precisely
what threatens to insert a certain distance between the philosopher and the
world.
Thus Serres's conception of knowledge as such, over and above the
sheer range of his learning, is absolutely essential to his work. For Serres,
knowledge is not aboutsomething; it is not of the order of representation or
critique. As played by Serres, the philosopher's role is to develop neither
an ontology nor an epistemology exclusively, but an ecology in which
things and ideas interact. As a writer, Serres resembles the proverbial
spider in its web: in spinning out the threads of his itineraries, Serres
engineers the "transport of concepts" whose "intersections and overlap-
pings" are a part of "the very tissue in which things themselves are im-
mersed." The web as a whole comprises what Serres calls the "diabolically
complex network of the inter-information network." Consequently,
Serres's writing displays a distinctly woven texture: his essays are hybrid
offsprings, or, in Bruno Latour's apt metaphor, they enact "a crossover,in
the genetic sense, whereby characters of one language are crossed with
attributes of another origin" (Latour, 90-91), splitting off and exchanging
entire portions and hereditary characteristics.
This method enables Serres to practice a specific kind of interdis-
ciplinarity. Rather than creating "interfaces" between given, static fields,
he imbricates them in one another, revealing their hidden morphological
analogies and negotiating local passages between them.3 Serres is thus able
to mold disciplinary knowledge into a supple field, an "encyclopedic epis-
temology," in which he performs operations of "chance and invention"
(Harari and Bell, xxix). Serres speaks almost literally when he stipulates
SubStance#83, 1997
40 Paul A. Harris
SubStance#83, 1997
The Itinerant Theorist 41
Finally we have reached such sizes that we exist physically. The thinking
individual, having become a beast collectively, is now joined to others in
multiple ways and turns to stone. [... ] At last we exist on a natural scale.
Mind has grown into a beast and the beast is growing into a [tectonic] plate.
(Contract,
19)
Serres sketches a new conception of humanity as a geo-body-politic, and
points toward a "geopolitics" inflected not through geography but geol-
ogy. The change in metaphor displaces humanity from its primacy as the
subject of history that imposes itself on the world; rather, the species is a
natural force whose eruptions change the course of global history, both
natural and cultural. In this cartography, the topographically discrete ter-
ritories of surface geography give way to topologically embedded,
stratified layers fissured by earthquakes. (Topological mapping, as we
shall see, is central to Serres's ecological model.)
This evolution of humanity to a global scale demands a new relation
between humans and the environment. The social contract on which so
much of western culture rests must be replaced by what Serres calls "the
natural contract." Serres's notion of the natural contract grows out of his
work on Lucretius and Epicurean philosophy, which opens a passage be-
tween social contract and natural context. In La naissancede la physiquedans
le texte de Lucrece, Serres explicates the premise behind the Epicurean
vision: social laws and writing derive from natural laws, because "history
is a physics and not the inverse. Language is already in bodies" (Naissance,
186; my translation). This interpenetration of the semiotic and the material
represents a literal extrapolation of the Lucretian conceit that compares
atoms and letters: "That atoms are letters, that connected bodies are
phrases, is no doubt not a metaphor, it is that without which there would
be nothing in existence" (ibid.,185; my translation).
The appeal of the Lucretian model for Serres clearly stems from its
positing an essential freedom at its base. This cosmology casts both cultural
and natural evolution as processes of perpetual transformation; unpre-
dictable mutations occur because there are no global or completely deter-
ministic "laws." "Nature does not code the universal," Serres writes, but
"the clinamen," the unpredictable sway that throws atoms off their deter-
minate courses and initiates change. The dinamen introduces a ripple in
the fabric of the world that spreads outward: it "performs the first coding,
it initiates a new temporality, writing, memory, reversibility and
negentropy" (Naissance,186; my translation).
SubStance#83, 1997
42 Paul A. Harris
Eco-Pedagogy/Cultural Contract
Topology
SubStance#83, 1997
44
44 Paul A. Harris
SubStance#83, 1997
The Itinerant Theorist 45
45
Once language itself is imagined as a network, then its space can best
be understood in terms of topology. A central and immensely productive
axiom in Serres's study of Lucretius is that "thesemioticis aboveall a topol-
ogy" (Naissance,179; his emphasis). In the linguistic field, topological rela-
tions are most visibly expressed in prepositions. Topology in general and
prepositions in particular share concerns with modes of linkage, and are
therefore intrinsic to figuring the space-between. In order to describe the
most intricately configured spaces,
one must use between,in, throughwith circumspection. . . operatorsof
flexions or declinationsthat designate. .. connectionsand relationsof
vicinity,proximity,distance,adherenceor accumulation,in otherwords,
positions.(Atlas,71,italicsadded)9
Topology is intrinsic to Serres's cultural ecology because it informs his
notion of culture. Topology provides a means of conceptualizing ecologies
as networks of relations or the tissue or weave of connections between
different spaces within a given context. "In general a culture constructs in
and by its history an original intersection between such spatial varieties, a
node of very precise and particular connections" (Hermes,45). Topology
elucidates the formative boundaries and constitutive limits that define cul-
ture because a given topology acts as a system of constraints on what forms
are allowed. The incest prohibition, for example, can be figured in terms of
the distinction between open and closed spaces central to topology:
"Enclosed" meansisolated,closed,separated;it alsomeansuntainted,pure
and chaste.Now, thatwhichis not chaste,incestus,canbe incest.Theincest
prohibitionis, then,literallya localsingularityexemplaryof this operation
in general,of the globalprojectof connectingthe disconnected,or the op-
posite,of openingwhatis closed... (Hermes, 45)
Textual Operators
SubStance#83, 1997
46 Paul A. Harris
SubStance#83, 1997
The Theorist
ItinerantTheorist
The Itinerant 47
Becoming Melville/Olson
SubStance#83, 1997
48 Paul A. Harris
whaling, from its syntactical patterns to its view of social relations. One
could also say that for Melville, as for Serres, nature remains intractable to
analysis; Melville, too, seeks to figure nature as an interior force that ir-
rupts from the outside. Finally, in more abstract terms, the "space" of
Moby-Dick-both its textual space and the physical geography-displays a
distinct, continuous topology.
Melville's writing has been analyzed in terms of topology by Charles
Olson, who is one of the few kindred spirits of Serres in American litera-
ture and criticism. Like Serres, Olson pursues a vision of truly interdiscipli-
nary knowledge and draws on several fields in formulating conceptual
models, which are then translated into their wider cultural implications.
Speaking of his un-disciplined pedagogical practice at the Black Mountain
School, Olson proclaims, "if there are no walls, there are no names ... and
the work of the morning is methodology. How to use yourself and on
what" ("Present Is Prologue," 40).14And Olson's writings on Melville are
among the few possible American analogues to Serres's work.
Both Olson and Serres find in late nineteenth-century mathematics a
discourse of the continuous that expresses a new relation between the
subject, space and the world. Olson extrapolates from Lobatschewsky and
Riemann a vision of space in which
Nothing was now inert fact, all things were there for feeling, to promote it,
and be felt; and man, in the midst of it, knowing well how he was folded in,
as well as how suddenly and strikingly he could extend himself. . . was
suddenly possessed or repossessed of a characterof being, a thing among
things, which I shall call a physicality. ("Equal,"47-48)
SubStance#83, 1997
The Itinerant Theorist 49
SubStance#83, 1997
50 Paul A. Harris
The passage also underscores the scaling nature of this space. Scaling
implies self-similarity across different scales, the embedding and connec-
tion among different scales in a single context. Since it seeks passages
connecting the local and the global, scaling is a primary feature of Serres's
work. Olson sees scaling as an intrinsic part of topological thought, for
only the topological "explains Melville's unique ability to reveal the very
large ... by the small" ("Equal,"49). The power of the whale's forehead,
for example, results from a linkage across scales, an interconnection be-
tween the "impalpable" air in the lungs, the "elasticity" of the forehead
"envelop," and the whale's fluid motion.
Filtered through the lenses of Serres's work, the tropes of Moby-Dick
become a set of topological operations. Several tropes and images in the
novel can be read as versions of a topological operation known as the
"baker transformation" or "horseshoe." As its name indicates, the baker
transformation takes a space and stretches it out one way, then squeezes it
in another, and then folds it over. This kind of spatial kneading is enacted
in "A Squeeze of the Hand," the chapter in which Ishmael relates how the
whale's sperm, once cooled down, becomes lumpy, and the lumps must be
squeezed until the sperm returns to liquid form. Just as the baker transfor-
mation constantly changes the topology of a shape, Ishmael's stretching
and squeezing involves a phase change from solid to liquid. The human
body is also transformed, as it molds itself to the activity until Ishmael's
hand traces the intricately curved contours of the shapes for which con-
tinuous topologies are known: "After having my hands in it for only a few
minutes, my fingers felt like eels, and began, as it were, to serpentine and
spiralize" (348). The "serpentine and spiralized" shapes figured in the
image provide an example of what Olson calls "the elliptical and hyper-
bolic spaces" Melville creates ("Equal,"50).
The most enigmatic, dynamic and formidable "force" in the complex
topology of Melville's space is Moby-Dick. Several striking descriptions of
Moby-Dick simply swimming express the continuous, enfolded nature of
space in this world. The most autonomous presence in the ocean, the one
who brings its fluid force to a head or dense point, Moby-Dick nevertheless
remains immersed in his encompassing, fluid element. When the crew is
pursuing Moby-Dick, Ishmael recounts how "his entire hump was distinct-
ly visible, sliding along the sea as if an isolated thing, and continually set in
a revolving ring of finest, fleecy, greenish foam" (447). Spatial distinctions
blur here: the whale is both above and below the surface, and the boundary
of the whale's form is marked by the intricately patterned foam ring whose
delicate texture replicates the honeycombed interior of the hump. Moby-
SubStance#83, 1997
The ItinerantTheorist
The Itinerant Theorist 51
Dick's swath through the water becomes a concert of forces, hues, and
patterns: "Before it... went the glistening white shadow from his broad,
milky forehead, a musical rippling playfully accompanying the shade; and
behind, the blue waters interchangeably flowed over into the moving val-
ley of his steady wake; and on either hand bright bubbles arose and danced
by his side" (447). Following Serres, we may break the description down
into its prepositional linkages, and discover a constant folding over:
"before" and "behind" give way to "accompanying" and "interchange-
ably"; the dynamics of Melville's syntax transform a description of the
whale swimming into an evocation of the medium that envelops the whale;
the whale and ocean merge in an entangled play of forces.
The harmonious resonance of elements (air bubbles, flowing water, a
supple body) and forces in the passage persists amid a highly turbulent
motion. This combination of resonance and turbulence is another example
of scaling: one of the major insights provided by models of turbulence in
chaos theory is that fluid turbulence displays an intricately nested, self-
similar pattern of swirls within swirls.'5 Thus the churning waters stirred
by the immense whale actually comprise a complex internal order and
economy of forces. Precisely this form of turbulence is one of Serres's
favorite tropes, for it signals a disorder that harbors a different form of
order. Translating Melville's imagery back into Serres, we might liken the
description of Moby-Dick swimming to Venus rising from the waves,
"Venus turbulente,"16 an image Serres uses to express the emergence of
order (Venus as an avatar of Eros) from chaos.17
For Olson, Melville's concrete physical descriptions of this kind reveal
nothing less that "the actual character and structure of the real itself." The
structure of a real made up of a "flow . . . in and out, intensive," is
composed most essentially of a tension between motion and rest. As Olson
points out, Melville joins "the feeling or necessity of the inert... to the
most instant and powerful actions" ("Equal,"51). An exemplary passage in
this regard is Melville's expression for how Moby-Dick moves in the water:
"A gentle joyousness-a mighty mildness of repose in swiftness, invested
the gliding whale" (447). The texture of the real, Olson argues, is composed
of a "flexible inertial field" ("Equal," 52). Topology is critical to under-
standing the nature of forms in this medium because it provides a means
to perceive and describe fluid, dynamic shapes defined less by distinct
outline than scaling properties. Topology thus sharpens perception and
simultaneously conceptualizes the spatial attributes of perceived shapes
because it makes one "able to discriminate and get in between the vague
SubStance#83, 1997
52 Paul A. Harris
SubStance#83, 1997
The Itinerant Theorist 53
SubStance#83, 1997
54
54 Paul A. Harris
Home At-Las(t)
SubStance#83, 1997
The Itinerant Theorist 55
scientific knowledge and a higher ethical (if not spiritual) calling can con-
verge within a set of reality, pleasure and moral principles alike. 19 Verena
Conley, for instance, yokes together feminist discourse, Guattari's
"ecosophy," and a critical evaluation of technologies in order to show that
"the world... needs to be treated with tact, and treated with patience" (89).
A central challenge facing cultural ecology is to reimagine our home in
terms of how technologized and virtual environments intersect with the
biosphere. This project is at the heart of Serres's Atlas (1994), a narrative
framed as a journey that explores both virtual spaces and various
geographies in order to fold together the natural, textual and the tech-
nological. Here a more worldly Serres offers a kind of retropsective resum6
that weaves together several strands of his work. But the maps drawn in
Atlas also include unexpected sites: the last sojourn recounts a journey to
Tibet inflected through the lenses of Tintin, the abominable snowman, and
Chuang Tzu's butterfly dream. This trip is less like a New Age spiritual
quest into a comic-book Buddhism than a revamped journey across the
tundra searching out Frankenstein's monster; but Serres seeks out a more
beneficient relation between human and machine, flesh and digital
domains. His Atlas comprises a "cartedu Tendre-verbe et adjectif," a map
both of tender in the adjectival sense and the verb tendre, to hold out, to
pitch a tent or spread a sail. In short, Serres seeks to stretch out and across
spaces in order to move toward the next fold, a possible and more tenable
future.
In the conclusion of Italo Calvino's InvisibleCities,Marco Polo, peering
into Kublai Khan's imperial atlas, searches out "an opening in the midst of
an incongruous landscape, a glint of lights in the fog, the dialogue of two
passersby meeting in the crowd." Using these components, Polo seeks to
"'put together, piece by piece, the perfect city, made of fragments mixed
with the rest, of instants separated by intervals, of signals one sends out,
not knowing who receives them"' (164). In answer to Khan's entropic
vision that "'the last landing place can only be the infernal city,"' Polo
articulates a new creed:
There are two ways to escape [the inferno of the living]. The first is easy for
many:acceptthe infernoand become such a part of it that you can no
longer see it. The second is risky and demands constant vigilance and
apprehension: seek and learn to recognize who and what, in the midst of
the inferno, are not inferno, then make them endure, give them space. (165)
SubStance#83, 1997
56 Paul A. Harris
Serres, sharing his longtime friend Calvino's vision, has done much to
preserve value amid the constant encroachments of destructive narrow-
mindedness in institutionalized knowledge. Combining a classical training
and sensibility with an ability to absorb contemporary trends and exper-
tise, Serres offers tools necessary to find and preserve the differences that
can make a difference.
LoyolaMarymount University
WORKSCITED
SubStance#83, 1997
The Itinerant Theorist 57
NOTES
1. The ecstatic experience Serresrecounts was not shared by others, of course. For
a very different account of the Loma Pieta quake, see Brown, Cyclesof Rockand Water
(1993).
2. Apparently, Serres sketched out his entire intellectual project and map of
knowledge at a very early stage in his career, and his voluminous work has adhered
to this vision quite strictly.
3. For Serres's critique of the "interface" metaphor, see his remarks in a
workshop in Livingston, ed., pp. 251-58. For Serres's vision of interdisciplinary pas-
sages, see especially HermesV: LePassagedu Nord-Ouest(Paris:Minuit, 1980).
4. For a treatmentof the in-between as a conceptual operatorfor interdisciplinary
work (in which Serres is treated briefly), see Batt (1994).
5. For one of Serres's more explicit meditations on pedagogical issues, see
"Literatureand the Exact Sciences."
6. Compare Serres's analysis with Bateson's discussions of cultural pathologies
in "Conscious Purpose versus Nature" in StepsToAn Ecologyof Mindand "'Timeis Out
of Joint,"the Appendix in Mind andNature.
7. Paulson's notion of "culturalecology" no doubt has been shaped in part by his
extensive work on Serres. See his chapter on Serres in TheNoise of Culture(pp. 30-52).
8. For an explication of Serres's concept of structure, see Paulson, Noise, p. 32f.
9. For an example of how Serres studies the topological relationships expressed
in prepositions, see the treatment of Maupassant's tale "TheHorla" in Atlas,pp. 61-85.
SubStance#83, 1997
58 Paul
Paul A.
A. Harris
Harris
10. For an overview of the questions ecocriticismposes about texts, see Glotfelty.
11. See Serres'sremarksin "Languageand Space"on Oedipus("thisis a discourse
that weaves a complex ..., that connects a network, that traces a graph upon space"
(47)) and TheOdyssey.
12. Here I would disagree with the critiqueHayles (1990)makes of Serres.Hayles
observes that Serres's own essays display a spiral form, but she insists that the tur-
bulence at the heart of Lucretianphysics "cannotbe modeled as a spiral, which is far
too orderly to express its extreme complexity." Hayles claims that "Serresdoes not so
much express turbulence, then, as tame it" (202). This seems to read Serres against
rather than with the grain of his discourse; one might say that Hayles, in literalizing
the spiral metaphor into a spatial model or geometric figure, tames the noise and
turbulence of Serres. For a different treatment of the problem of how Serres attempts
to write turbulence, see Assad (1991).
13. For a fruitful reading of Melville in terms of Serres, see Alexander Gelley's
use of Serres'sparasite in reading Melville's TheConfidence-Man, in Gelley, pp. 79-100.
14. The first time I heard Serres speak I wondered, echoing Olson's phrase, how
to use Serres and on what. Serres'sthought can induce a drug-like effect-I remember
his lecture evoking a futuristic city composed of elements from ancient metropolises,
combining realistic detail and a fantastic conception in a way reminiscent of an in-
visible city of Calvino's. Initially, I tried to discern the argument Serres was present-
ing, and the flow of his language and the train of his thought seemed utterly
opaque-especially given the limitations of my French. But once I listened with a
more subconscious, holistic form of attention, his city began to take shape before me
as an abstract structure with the intricately filigreed texture of a fractal. In retrospect,
after the talk, and then later in reading the version of the talk distilled into prose, it
was hard to retrace the connection between the original words and this elusive im-
pression they formed in the mind's eye.
15. This insight is not a "discovery" of chaos theory, however. As Mandelbrot
(1983)points out, Lewis Fry Richardsonactually described the self-similarity of eddies
linked by a cascade in turbulent flow in a 1926 paper.
16. The phrase, which appears on the back cover of Genese,is cited and explored
by Assad in depth. Assad even sounds like a combination of Olson and Melville when
she characterizes the trope of genesis/chaos as "that tumultuous chaos that is the
nurturing, primal plasma of stochastic moments of invention" (279).
17. For a detailed examination of this trope in Serres, see Assad (1991).
18. Serres has voiced the impact that reading Mandelbrothas had on his work in
several places.
19. An instance of this sort of convergence between technological, scientific, and
spiritual interests from a scientist is Stuart Kauffman's At Home in the Universe:The
Searchfor the Lawsof Self-Organization and Complexity,in which Kauffman expresses
"the hope that what some are calling the new sciences of complexity may help us find
anew our place in the universe, that through this new science, we may recover our
sense of worth, our sense of the sacred." More than new scientific knowledge, these
scientific ideas ostensibly are to provide "a new way to think about origins, evolution,
and the profound naturalness of life and its myriad patterns of unfolding" (Kauffman,
4-5). The intriguing aspect of Kauffman's rhetoric is the extent to which it is inflected
through capitalism-economics and the flows of capital are constant illustrative ex-
amples of the "laws" Kauffman evokes-and technology-simulations in virtual
space are the basis from which several of Kauffman'slaws derive.
SubStance#83, 1997