Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Gino Fragoso
December 7, 2018
RICA Case Study 2
Introduction
This case study will focus on a first-grade student named Noah. His primary language is
English. The three assessments used to measure his progress were a reading ability assessment, a
concepts of print assessment, and a reading interest inventory. We began with the reading ability
assessment which identified Noah’s independent reading level at preprimer, his instructional
reading level at primer, and his frustration reading level at 1st grade. Secondly, his answers in the
reading interest survey showed he enjoyed reading once he began but felt neutral at the
beginning of reading new books. Lastly, the concepts of print assessment showed he knew book
Analysis
THREE STRENGTHS/NEEDS
1. Need: Word Identification. For this assessment, a list of ten words per grade level was
used to identify the reading levels. The assessment specified that one error in the list of
ten would identify his independent level, two errors would identify his instructional level,
and three errors would identify his frustration level. Noah, who is in first grade, tested at
preprimer as his independent reading level which is the level he is capable of reading on
his own without assistance. His instructional reading level is primer which is the level in
which he can read a text and understand it with the aid of a teacher. His frustration
reading level is grade 1, which would include words that cannot be read or understood
even with aid. To reach this frustration reading level the assessment asked that at least 3
words be read incorrectly. Noah read five of the 10 words incorrectly which is far below
asked about his home life, reading interests, and reading attitude. Based on the Interest
and attitude survey, Noah tested as enjoying reading and looking at books on his own.
Although he was neutral about reading at home, he showed happiness at receiving books
as gifts. The survey also shows that he enjoys reading during summer and going to book
stores. He did stay neutral at starting new books and reading at home but liked being able
3. Strength: Concepts about print. This survey used an early level story book from his
daycare classroom and a checklist questionnaire. Noah did well on the concepts of print
assessment. He knew most of the book concept questions as well as text directionality
and punctuation. He was working on finding similar words and upper-case letters in the
text. This may have to do with losing interest after the previous two surveys. Noah was
able to identify period, question mark, and exclamation point with fairly accurate
descriptions. For example, when asked what a period was, Noah answered “not a
Improvement Plan
1. Part-To-Whole lessons. To help Noah increase his reading level I would use Part-
To-Whole lessons. In this kind of lesson, I would be able to begin with the target sound
and model letter combinations to make words. After modeling what sound the letter
makes I would have Noah say the sound each time I pointed to it. Because Noah is in the
first grade and his independent reading level is pre-primer, I would begin with some
basics to aid in his reading of smaller words. I could use this in a small group with direct
RICA Case Study 4
instruction allowing me to target that skill with Noah and any other children who are
2. Shared Book Experience. To increase his knowledge of concepts about print and help
with independent reading I would use the Shared Book Experience. By suing an
oversized book, I can model the concepts about print that Noah and other students need to
know. The oversized book would allow me to easily identify and demonstrate the
concepts I am trying to teach or re-teach. The survey I administered shows that Noah is
lacking in certain punctuation marks. Knowing this, I can plan what kind of questions I
want to bring up in the reading and choose books accordingly taking into account he
goals of lesson and the student’s interest from the student interest survey.
Application
beginning with sound identification and then having the student blend the sounds to build
words (Zarrillo, 2017, p. 50). Honig, Diamond, and Gutlohn write that systematic and
Kindergarten and Grade 1” (2018, p. 171). Systematic phonics lessons like the part-to-
whole lesson build on previous skills like sound identification and slowly become more
complex when they begin to blend the sounds in smaller to larger words (Honig et al.,
2018, p. 171).
2. Shared Book Experience. In this type of lesson, the teacher sits and reads picture
books to students using oversized picture books and through the activity the students
potentially learn all the concepts about print (Zarrillo, 2017, p. 33). Teachers can begin
RICA Case Study 5
by pointing out book features and asking predictive questions (Zarrillo, 2017, p. 33).
Using these strategies, the teacher models what students can use to identify the different
concepts.